Does anyone actually think that rejeuelvac is good for them?? I try to
eat a good diet with good natural foods and to be honest the thought of
fermented water makes me feel rather ill, I cant imagine how it can
possibly be good for the system.. almost gone off water surley?
Obviously I am open on this matter and I would love to hear from anyone
that actually drinks it on a regular basis
Cheers
-----Original Message-----
From: eholl2002 [mailto:eholl2002@...]
Sent: 27 February 2007 16:24
To: wheatgrass@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [wheatgrass] Re: Rejeuvelac
I've been making Rejeuvelac for a while now. If it goes "bad" it may
be too warm for fermenting. I think it's supposed to be 70 degrees
or less. If it simply comes out as a gel your probably using the
soft spring seeds which is normal. I use the hard winter seeds, soak
12 hours, sprout a day or two, ferment for a day and then
refridgerate. Comes out looking like watery milk with a sour taste.
--- In wheatgrass@yahoogro <mailto:wheatgrass%40yahoogroups.com>
ups.com, Victoria Satta <victoria2dc@...>
wrote:
>
>
> Hi All....
>
> Hope the new year is going well for everyone.
>
> Does anyone make rejejvelac with wheat berries? The first time I
> made it I used berries that I got from a place in Utah. Since I'm
in
> CO, I decided that I would find seeds and soil locally. Did
that...
> in fact, I bought seed and soil from the company that grows the
grass
> for Wild Oats... so I know that its high quality.
>
> Anne Wigmore says to let is sit quietly for 3 days. First time I
did
> it everything was perfect. The second, third and fourth times I
used
> the new seed, same jars, etc., and it came out all yuky (like a
> slimy, moldy kind of stuff on the top).
>
> Do you have any idea why this would be happening and how I can
avoid
> it? I washed the seeds first and skimmed off the ones that rose
to
> the top. Ugh... I don't know what else to do. Would it make a
> difference if I changed the room temp or if I let it ferment for a
> shorter period of time? Or perhaps, I need to go back to the
> original seed source???
>
> I appreciate your input.
>
> Thanks,
> Vicki
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]