Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
vpta · Virginia Physical Therapy Association
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Want to share photos of your group with the world? Add a group photo to Flickr.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Re: [vpta-listserv] post re: Direct Access Legislation   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #137 of 206 |
RE: [vpta-listserv] post re: Direct Access Legislation

With great respect for all views in this discussion:
 
I think the attempt to portray United4achange as an uninvolved group of whiners is unfortunate. The group is comprised of involved members who have served the VPTA and APTA in many capacities for many years, We have been VPTA president, 2 state treasurers, several district chairs and directors, many state level chair positions, 2 VPTA PAC chairs, 2 VPTA PAC treasurers, an editor of the state newsletter, members of many state and district level committees, a past president of the VA PT Board, you get the picture. We have earned the right to express our concerns.
 
A major legislation action took place in VA which greatly affects practice. This was done with minimal communication or full disclosure to membership. As word trickled out to those not privy to communcations to leadership, e-mails and phone calls went unanswered  by both VPTA and APTA. District legislative chairs were not kept in the loop.
 
Even if this issue doesn't "burn" you, you should be very concerned that important decisions which affect your livlihood are decided in this manner. If this is swept under the rug and the process is not questioned and evaluated, what's to keep this from happening again with an issue that is dear to your heart?
 
I'm a great believer in learning from mistakes. I will fly Jet Blue again in spite of being a traveler during the week of the ice storm. The simple reason is that, unlike typical corporate America, they stepped up and admitted that mistakes were made and evaluated ways to make sure it didn't happen again. They didn't tell travelers to get over it and not whine because they couldn't control Mother Nature. A sincere thank you to all current volunteer VPTA leadership. That said - volunteer representation does not imply absolution of accountability.
 
The statement that this won't increase cost to licensees is absolutely untrue.  All of us enjoyed a tremendous reduction in licensure fees in 2006 ($60 for a 2 year renewal). This was solely attributed to the low cost of operating the VA PT Board. This bill has added duties to staff at the Department of Health Professsions PT executive office, as well as added expenses for additional meetings in Richmond for 8-12 people at each meeting.  Your license fees pay for DHP staff and PT Board/ Committee member travel/accommodations/per diem for these meetings.  Your license fees pay for the additional phone calls, printing (reams of printing), FedEx, etc. Every one of us licensed to practice in VA pays for that. Those seeking direct access certification will pay an addditional fee.
 
United4achange are members who are very proud of our profession. This is not personal. We have good friends on the VPTA BOD and I can say that some of the best and smartest people I know sit on the Board. You ask what we want - the bottom line for me is accountability. Enough accountability that we can feel confident that we have acknowledged mistakes, learned from mistakes and can move forward. We respect a democracy and certainly don't expect things to "always go the way everyone (insert United4achange) wants it to".  We were not given the opportunity to participate. At least 3 members of our concerned group have taken active steps to be part of the process to move forward.
 
Enough said.
 
Disclaimer - I am speaking for myself and other members of our group may not agree with comments I've made.
 
Thank you.
 
Gayle Garnett, PT, MBA
 

From: vpta@yahoogroups.com on behalf of Wolff-Burke, Melissa
Sent: Wed 3/28/2007 3:55 PM
To: vpta@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [vpta-listserv] post re: Direct Access Legislation

Dear Bill and colleagues,

I speak for myself in this response to the email from "United4achange."

 

I applaud your efforts to engage more of the membership in active dialogue, but feel the time for complaining/discussion on the bill is over and now we need to be active participants in determining what the "minimum education, training, and experience requirements" are for the certification criteria. It's just a continuing education course for heaven's sake! I just am not seeing the trauma here. Please consider that there are many PTs who need this push to practice in a manner that represents the doctoring physical therapist of current and future practice. How do I know? Because it is my job (as an academic you know), to see what is going on out there, and what I see is not the level of practice across the state, that you and your colleagues may practice, and what many of us desire.

 

What do you expect to gain by this email? Do you want the VPTA president to resign? Do you want the entire VPTA Board to resign? Do you want the Governor to repeal it (if that is even possible)?

 

Let me address your points:

It is NOT more expense. It means that you use your continuing education money for the course, and next year, you use your money for something else. (And in fact, we do not even know what the group will recommend to the PT Board.)

 

We have had seven years of an independent board and it still is independent (unless I did not read the bill correctly and the Medical Society of Virginia folks are now ON the PT Board). 

 

Yes - we still have restrictions. When we tried to do away with them last year, we got NO WHERE. And now we got somewhere; not where we want to be, but a step ahead from where we were. A patient will be able to see me off the street now, and he/she could NOT do that before.

 

The five year moratorium makes sense because we do not have the money, organization or political clout to take on the Medical Society and Orthopaedic Society of Virginia. With less than 45% membership (and even less who actively engage) it will be a long time coming until we can hope to succeed in that area. The APTA is NOT going forward with a national mandate to stop Referral for Profit (RFP). As I understand it, they are in a go-slow, collect-data phase. Hence, Virginia is not in opposition to the efforts in the House of Delegates, and we will be working in concert with the APTA, and the RFP task force to collect CURRENT data and devise an action plan.

 

The VPTA is a representative democracy. It doesn't always go the way everyone wants it to. If folks want to be represented, then they need to be involved. Period. 

 

In conclusion, I AGREE that the new law is not perfect; it is a step forward and was done with the best interests of the physical therapy profession and physical therapists in Virginia in mind.

 
Melissa Wolff-Burke, PT, EdD, ATC
Shenandoah University
Division of Physical Therapy
333 West Cork Street, Suite 40
Winchester, VA 22601
(w) 540-545-7238
(fax) 540-665-5530
 



From: vpta@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vpta@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Bill Whiteford
Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 4:16 PM
To: vpta@yahoogroups.com
Cc: Bill Whiteford
Subject: [vpta-listserv] post

Please post the following information.

Thank you.

Bill

Recent Changes to the Laws Governing Physical Therapy in Virginia

Information for Licensed Physical Therapists and Physical Therapist Assistants

A Message From:

Rachel Amidon, PT,  Christina Curran, PT,  Brian D’Orazio, PT,  Kash Eagleton, PT,  Melissa Eagleton, PT, Barbara Ehman, PT, Gayle Garnett, PT,  Brian Hoke, PT,  Ginger Houck, PT,  Pat Huston, PT,  Scott Hyldahl, PT,  Samuel Jamison, PT,  Bill Melchione, PT, Judy Jenkins, PT,  Marshall Rennie, PT,  Beth Rennie, PT, Bill Whiteford, PT,  Colleen Whiteford, PT,  Mary Wooten, PT,  Heidi Zander, PT

What are some of the privileges and limitations recently passed by the  Virginia legislature regarding treatment by a Physical Therapist without physician referral?

PT’s must obtain a certificate of authority to evaluate and treat patients without referral. This certification will separate how different therapists are allowed to practice, and require additional expense to Virginia Physical Therapists in the form of fees and continuing education. 

The criteria for this certification will be decided by three members of the VPTA and three physicians from the Medical Society of Virginia.  After 7 years of an independent PT Board, we are again putting our profession under further "referral and direction" constraints of physicians.

Once a PT has gone through all of  the required certification, limitations still apply for treatment without referral:

  • You may NOT treat a patient if they are already under the care of a physician/referring practitioner for the problem. The patient must attest to this in writing.
  • At the time of evaluation, the patient must identify a physician/referring    practitioner that they will see if care is desired beyond the 14 day limit and they must release their information to be sent to that provider.  
  • You must send your evaluation to the designated provider within 3 days.
  • Physical therapy treatment without referral cannot exceed a period of 14 business days.
  • A PT may not evaluate and treat a patient without referral if they were evaluated within the previous 3 months

What is wrong with this picture?

    To get support of the Virginia Orthopaedic   Society and the Medical Society of Virginia, the VPTA Board of Directors made binding promises to these physician organizations that for five years the VPTA WILL NOT:

  Introduce any legislation that prohibits physician ownership of physical therapy

   Introduce any legislation expanding the scope of practice of physical therapy

     The political climate as it relates to referral for profit is shifting, and public opinion on conflict of interest is generally negative.  The physicians’ groups wanted assurances we would not bring this into the legislature for debate and discussion (and hence, the newspapers).  Our ability to bring forth any legislation to address this problem was negotiated away for “new freedoms” for PT that appear to be crafted with protection of the physicians’ interest first and foremost.  While we gained treatment subject to the conditions noted, the physicians gained further advantage and     control of Physical Therapy in Virginia.

      The recent action of the VPTA Board has profoundly affected the practice of EVERY PT and PTA in the Commonwealth of Virginia.  Prior to doing so, they failed to survey the membership, enlist the full membership in discussion on the negotiations with the physicians, or communicate the details of the bill to Virginia PT’s and PTA’s before support was solicited.  When specifics of the bill became available many concerned VPTA members contacted the Board, but the Board elected to “stay the course” in the face of these weighty concerns.  A request to present an opposing viewpoint to the membership on this legislation, prior to its passing, was denied.

     The actions of the Virginia Chapter are in direct opposition to the directive of the APTA House of Delegates Resolution to seek legislative prohibition of physician ownership of physical   therapy services (RC  06-02-24-48).

Now what?

Every PT and PTA should take the time to read the specifics of the new physical therapy practice act. It is our opinion that VPTA/ APTA communications have only highlighted those aspects which cast the changes in a positive light,  neglecting to mention new restrictions on practice.  The regulations can be accessed at the following link: http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?071+ful+SB1305ER

If you read the full legislation and AGREE the new law is a worthwhile and less confusing improvement and you agree with the way this was handled by the VPTA, let us know.

If you DO NOT AGREE with the way this was handled, and would have preferred alternative actions, make your feelings known to the VPTA Board of Directors.  You may do so individually, AND you may join us in conveying the following message at the next meeting of the Board:

  • The VPTA failed to properly represent the membership in crafting the recent             legislation and negotiating with physician’s groups
  • It is in the best interest of the membership to require the VPTA to survey its members and engage in meaningful discussion to assure that the majority support any legislation that alters the laws governing Physical Therapy practice in Virginia.

We encourage all PTs and PTAs in Virginia to be active members of the VPTAAll who practice Physical Therapy are affected by these regulatory changes.

Let your voice be heard!

  • Send us your opinion via fax, e-mail, or mail and/or
  • Attend the Issues Forum on 4/13 or the Board of Directors meeting on 4/15 at the VPTA Annual Retreat (details at www.vpta.org).

IT IS IMPERATIVE THAT THE VPTA BOARD OF DIRECTORS IS PROVIDED FEEDBACK ON THEIR ROLE IN THE  RECENT LEGISLATIVE CHANGES

Physical Therapists and Physical Therapist Assistants, who would like to express their opinion about the manner in which the VPTA advanced recent PT legislation, may do so by sending an e-mail to:   united4achange@comcast.net     

PTs and PTAs may also send their opinions on this topic by completing the following:

========================================================================

I am a   _ X __ Physical Therapist      

and it is my opinion that the VPTA acted     __ X _  appropriately 

in the recent introduction and advancement of laws changing the practice of physical therapy in Virginia.  

 In addition, I   _ X __ agree      

that the VPTA should establish specific guidelines for member notification and majority approval when advocating  changes.

Additional comments:  ___________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

Name: ___ Melissa Wolff-Burke __________________________

City: ______ Winchester, VA _________________________

You can fax this by 4/4 to:  (540) 901-8773 (Attn: Colleen Whiteford)

You may also mail this to:    

    Blue Ridge Physical Therapy

    728 N. Lee Highway

    Lexington VA   24450



____

This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information and should not be used by anyone who is not the original intended recipient(s) or authorized to receive this message for the original intended recipient(s). if you have received this e-mail in error please: 1) inform the sender only, do not "Reply to All." 2) Delete this e-mail from your mailbox and any other storage system you may have saved or copied it to. 3) Do not print, forward, copy or save this e-mail or share its contents with anyone.

The contents of this e-mail do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Shenandoah University.
____


This electronic message may contain information that is confidential or legally privileged. It is intended only for the use of the individual(s) and entity named as recipients in the message. If you are not an intended recipient of this message, please notify the sender immediately and delete the material from any computer. Do not deliver, distribute, or copy this message, and do not disclose its contents or take any action in reliance on the information it contains.



Fri Mar 30, 2007 12:53 am

ggarnett@...
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #137 of 206 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

Dear Bill and colleagues, I speak for myself in this response to the email from "United4achange." I applaud your efforts to engage more of the membership in...
Wolff-Burke, Melissa
mwolff@...
Send Email
Mar 28, 2007
10:11 pm

I think Melissa makes a good point about VPTA participation. My observation after being involved on the leadership level for eight years is that there is a...
Julie DoBias
dobiasguy@...
Send Email
Mar 29, 2007
2:01 pm

With great respect for all views in this discussion: I think the attempt to portray United4achange as an uninvolved group of whiners is unfortunate. The group...
GAYLE GARNETT
ggarnett@...
Send Email
Mar 30, 2007
2:49 am
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help