To My Fellow
VPTA Members:
I am
compelled to provide some comment and clarification for the sake of the
discussion. I will start with the clarification.
“The criteria for this certification will
be decided by three members of the VPTA and three physicians from the Medical
Society of Virginia. After 7 years of
an independent PT Board, we are again putting our profession under further
"referral and direction" constraints of physicians.”
I
offer the following comments on the concerns voiced by
‘united4achange.’ I believe that the VPTA leadership acted
appropriately in the development and negotiation of the new direct access
statute. The Chapter has been in discussion with the Medical Society on
this very topic, with varying degrees of success, for many years. Having
been personally involved in the negotiations in the late 1990’s, I am
actually impressed that we were able to negotiate this position. The
unfortunate truth of the matter is that as long as we were fighting against the
Medical Society, we were making little (if any) progress in changing our direct
access legislation. It was imperative that we come to the table ready to
negotiate, and our leadership was charged to do just that. Obviously, we
would all like to see unencumbered direct access legislation in
Shawne
E. Soper, PT, MBA
From:
vpta@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vpta@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Bill Whiteford
Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 4:16
PM
To: vpta@yahoogroups.com
Cc: Bill Whiteford
Subject: [vpta-listserv] post
Please post
the following information.
Thank you.
Bill
Recent Changes to the Laws Governing Physical Therapy in
Information
for Licensed Physical Therapists and Physical Therapist Assistants
A Message From:
Rachel
Amidon, PT, Christina Curran, PT, Brian D’Orazio, PT,
Kash Eagleton, PT, Melissa Eagleton, PT, Barbara Ehman, PT, Gayle
Garnett, PT, Brian Hoke, PT, Ginger Houck, PT, Pat Huston,
PT, Scott Hyldahl, PT, Samuel Jamison, PT, Bill Melchione,
PT, Judy Jenkins, PT, Marshall Rennie, PT, Beth Rennie, PT, Bill
Whiteford, PT, Colleen Whiteford, PT, Mary Wooten, PT, Heidi
Zander, PT
What are some of the
privileges and limitations recently passed by the
PT’s
must obtain a certificate of authority to evaluate and treat patients without
referral. This certification will separate
how different therapists are allowed to practice, and require additional
expense to Virginia Physical Therapists in the form of fees and continuing
education.
The
criteria for this certification will be decided by three members of the VPTA
and three physicians from the Medical Society of Virginia. After 7 years of an independent PT Board, we are
again putting our profession under further "referral and direction"
constraints of physicians.
Once
a PT has gone through all of the required certification, limitations still apply for treatment without
referral:
- You may NOT treat a patient if
they are already under the care of a physician/referring practitioner for
the problem. The patient must attest to
this in writing.
- At the time of evaluation, the
patient must identify a
physician/referring practitioner that they will see
if care is desired beyond the 14 day limit and they must release
their information to be sent to that provider.
- You must send your evaluation to
the designated provider within 3
days.
- Physical therapy treatment
without referral cannot exceed a period
of 14 business days.
- A PT may not evaluate and
treat a patient without referral if they were evaluated within
the previous 3 months
What is wrong with this
picture?
To get support of the Virginia Orthopaedic Society and the Medical
Society of Virginia, the VPTA Board of Directors made binding promises to these
physician organizations that for five years the
VPTA WILL NOT:
Introduce any legislation that prohibits physician
ownership of physical therapy
Introduce any legislation expanding the
scope of practice of physical therapy
The political climate as it relates to referral for profit is shifting, and
public opinion on conflict of interest is generally negative. The
physicians’ groups wanted assurances we would not bring this into the
legislature for debate and discussion (and hence, the newspapers). Our
ability to bring forth any legislation to address this problem was negotiated
away for “new freedoms” for PT that appear to be crafted with
protection of the physicians’ interest first and foremost. While we
gained treatment subject to the conditions noted, the physicians gained further
advantage and control of Physical Therapy in
The recent action of the VPTA Board has profoundly affected the practice of
EVERY PT and PTA in the
The actions of the Virginia Chapter are in direct opposition to the directive
of the APTA House of Delegates Resolution to seek legislative prohibition of
physician ownership of physical therapy services (RC
06-02-24-48)
Now what?
Every PT and PTA should take
the time to read the specifics of the new physical therapy practice act. It is our opinion that VPTA/
APTA communications have only highlighted those aspects which cast the changes
in a positive light, neglecting to mention new restrictions on practice.
The regulations can be accessed at the following link: http://leg1.
If
you read the full legislation and AGREE the new law is a worthwhile and less
confusing improvement and you agree with the way this was handled by the VPTA,
let us know.
If
you DO NOT AGREE with the way this was handled, and would have preferred
alternative actions, make your feelings known to the VPTA Board of
Directors. You may do so individually, AND you may join us in conveying
the following message at the next meeting of the Board:
- The
VPTA failed to properly represent the membership in crafting the
recent
legislation and negotiating with physician’s groups
- It is
in the best interest of the membership to require the VPTA to survey its
members and engage in meaningful discussion to assure that the majority
support any legislation that alters the laws governing Physical Therapy
practice in
.Virginia
We
encourage all PTs and PTAs in
Let your voice be heard!
- Send us your opinion via fax,
e-mail, or mail and/or
- Attend the Issues Forum on 4/13
or the Board of Directors meeting on 4/15 at the VPTA Annual Retreat
(details at www.vpta.org).
IT IS IMPERATIVE THAT THE
VPTA BOARD OF DIRECTORS IS PROVIDED FEEDBACK ON THEIR ROLE IN THE RECENT
LEGISLATIVE CHANGES
Physical
Therapists and Physical Therapist Assistants, who would like to express their
opinion about the manner in which the VPTA advanced recent PT legislation, may
do so by sending an e-mail to: united4achange@
PTs
and PTAs may also send their opinions on this topic by completing the following:
============
I am
a ___ Physical Therapist ___
Physical Therapist Assistant
and
it is my opinion that the VPTA acted ___
appropriately ___ inappropriately
in
the recent introduction and advancement of laws changing the practice of
physical therapy in
that
future VPTA actions which alter the Virginia PT /PTA practice act should be
more fully disclosed to the membership (including dissenting opinions), and the
VPTA should establish specific guidelines for member notification and majority
approval when advocating such changes.
Additional
comments: ____________
____________
Name:
____________
City:
____________
You can fax this by 4/4 to: (540) 901-8773 (Attn: Colleen Whiteford)
You may also mail this to: