Dear Bill and colleagues,
I speak for myself in this response to the email from "United4achange."
I applaud your efforts to engage more of the membership in active dialogue, but feel the time for complaining/discussion on the bill is over and now we need to be active participants in determining what the "minimum education, training, and experience requirements" are for the certification criteria. It's just a continuing education course for heaven's sake! I just am not seeing the trauma here. Please consider that there are many PTs who need this push to practice in a manner that represents the doctoring physical therapist of current and future practice. How do I know? Because it is my job (as an academic you know), to see what is going on out there, and what I see is not the level of practice across the state, that you and your colleagues may practice, and what many of us desire.
What do you expect to gain by this email? Do you want the VPTA president to resign? Do you want the entire VPTA Board to resign? Do you want the Governor to repeal it (if that is even possible)?
Let me address your points:
It is NOT more expense. It means that you use your continuing education money for the course, and next year, you use your money for something else. (And in fact, we do not even know what the group will recommend to the PT Board.)
We have had seven years of an independent board and it still is independent (unless I did not read the bill correctly and the Medical Society of Virginia folks are now ON the PT Board).
Yes - we still have restrictions. When we tried to do away with them last year, we got NO WHERE. And now we got somewhere; not where we want to be, but a step ahead from where we were. A patient will be able to see me off the street now, and he/she could NOT do that before.
The five year moratorium makes sense because we do not have the money, organization or political clout to take on the Medical Society and Orthopaedic Society of Virginia. With less than 45% membership (and even less who actively engage) it will be a long time coming until we can hope to succeed in that area. The APTA is NOT going forward with a national mandate to stop Referral for Profit (RFP). As I understand it, they are in a go-slow, collect-data phase. Hence,
The VPTA is a representative democracy. It doesn't always go the way everyone wants it to. If folks want to be represented, then they need to be involved. Period.
In conclusion, I AGREE that the new law is not perfect; it is a step forward and was done with the best interests of the physical therapy profession and physical therapists in Virginia in mind.
From: vpta@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vpta@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Bill Whiteford
Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 4:16 PM
To: vpta@yahoogroups.com
Cc: Bill Whiteford
Subject: [vpta-listserv] post
Please post the following information.
Thank you.
Bill
Recent Changes to the Laws Governing Physical Therapy in
Information for Licensed Physical Therapists and Physical Therapist Assistants
A Message From:
Rachel Amidon, PT, Christina Curran, PT, Brian D’Orazio, PT, Kash Eagleton, PT, Melissa Eagleton, PT, Barbara Ehman, PT, Gayle Garnett, PT, Brian Hoke, PT, Ginger Houck, PT, Pat Huston, PT, Scott Hyldahl, PT, Samuel Jamison, PT, Bill Melchione, PT, Judy Jenkins, PT, Marshall Rennie, PT, Beth Rennie, PT, Bill Whiteford, PT, Colleen Whiteford, PT, Mary Wooten, PT, Heidi Zander, PT
What are some of the privileges and limitations recently passed by the
PT’s must obtain a certificate of authority to evaluate and treat patients without referral. This certification will separate how different therapists are allowed to practice, and require additional expense to Virginia Physical Therapists in the form of fees and continuing education.
The criteria for this certification will be decided by three members of the VPTA and three physicians from the Medical Society of Virginia. After 7 years of an independent PT Board, we are again putting our profession under further "referral and direction" constraints of physicians.
Once a PT has gone through all of the required certification, limitations still apply for treatment without referral:
- You may NOT treat a patient if they are already under the care of a physician/referring practitioner for the problem. The patient must attest to this in writing.
- At the time of evaluation, the patient must identify a physician/referring practitioner that they will see if care is desired beyond the 14 day limit and they must release their information to be sent to that provider.
- You must send your evaluation to the designated provider within 3 days.
- Physical therapy treatment without referral cannot exceed a period of 14 business days.
- A PT may not evaluate and treat a patient without referral if they were evaluated within the previous 3 months
What is wrong with this picture?
To get support of the Virginia Orthopaedic Society and the Medical Society of Virginia, the VPTA Board of Directors made binding promises to these physician organizations that for five years the VPTA WILL NOT:
Introduce any legislation that prohibits physician ownership of physical therapy
Introduce any legislation expanding the scope of practice of physical therapy
The political climate as it relates to referral for profit is shifting, and public opinion on conflict of interest is generally negative. The physicians’ groups wanted assurances we would not bring this into the legislature for debate and discussion (and hence, the newspapers). Our ability to bring forth any legislation to address this problem was negotiated away for “new freedoms” for PT that appear to be crafted with protection of the physicians’ interest first and foremost. While we gained treatment subject to the conditions noted, the physicians gained further advantage and control of Physical Therapy in
The recent action of the VPTA Board has profoundly affected the practice of EVERY PT and PTA in the
The actions of the Virginia Chapter are in direct opposition to the directive of the APTA House of Delegates Resolution to seek legislative prohibition of physician ownership of physical therapy services (RC 06-02-24-48)
Now what?
Every PT and PTA should take the time to read the specifics of the new physical therapy practice act. It is our opinion that VPTA/ APTA communications have only highlighted those aspects which cast the changes in a positive light, neglecting to mention new restrictions on practice. The regulations can be accessed at the following link: http://leg1.
If you read the full legislation and AGREE the new law is a worthwhile and less confusing improvement and you agree with the way this was handled by the VPTA, let us know.
If you DO NOT AGREE with the way this was handled, and would have preferred alternative actions, make your feelings known to the VPTA Board of Directors. You may do so individually, AND you may join us in conveying the following message at the next meeting of the Board:
- The VPTA failed to properly represent the membership in crafting the recent legislation and negotiating with physician’s groups
- It is in the best interest of the membership to require the VPTA to survey its members and engage in meaningful discussion to assure that the majority support any legislation that alters the laws governing Physical Therapy practice in
.Virginia
We encourage all PTs and PTAs in
Let your voice be heard!
- Send us your opinion via fax, e-mail, or mail and/or
- Attend the Issues Forum on 4/13 or the Board of Directors meeting on 4/15 at the VPTA Annual Retreat (details at www.vpta.org).
IT IS IMPERATIVE THAT THE VPTA BOARD OF DIRECTORS IS PROVIDED FEEDBACK ON THEIR ROLE IN THE RECENT LEGISLATIVE CHANGES
Physical Therapists and Physical Therapist Assistants, who would like to express their opinion about the manner in which the VPTA advanced recent PT legislation, may do so by sending an e-mail to: united4achange@
PTs and PTAs may also send their opinions on this topic by completing the following:
============
I am a _ X __ Physical Therapist
and it is my opinion that the VPTA acted __ X _ appropriately
in the recent introduction and advancement of laws changing the practice of physical therapy in
In addition, I _ X __ agree
that the VPTA should establish specific guidelines for member notification and majority approval when advocating changes.
Additional comments: ____________
____________
Name: ___ Melissa Wolff-Burke _________
City: ______ Winchester, VA ______
You can fax this by 4/4 to: (540) 901-8773 (Attn: Colleen Whiteford)
You may also mail this to:
____
This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information and should not be used by anyone who is not the original intended recipient(s) or authorized to receive this message for the original intended recipient(s). if you have received this e-mail in error please: 1) inform the sender only, do not "Reply to All." 2) Delete this e-mail from your mailbox and any other storage system you may have saved or copied it to. 3) Do not print, forward, copy or save this e-mail or share its contents with anyone.
The contents of this e-mail do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Shenandoah University.
____