Effective Action Against Codex
http://curezone.com/forums/fm.asp?i=853055#i or http://curezone.com/forums/top50.asp.
IAHF is the International Advocates for Health Freedom [www.iahf.com]
.
IAHF COMMENTS ON [2 false flag health organizations] Natural Solutions Foundation [NSF] and Citizens for Health [CFH], [which] were created [by big drug companies] to attempt to DIVERT the [public's] grass roots AWAY from the message of IAHF and allied organizations [for effective action against Codex and for health freedom].
.
[Codex, a creation of the big drug companies, is trying globally to limit public access to nutritional products, because the latter compete with their profitable junk drugs.] The purpose of NSF's & CFH's spin is to deceive vitamin consumers into thinking it is possible to stop Codex AT CODEX and to divert people from pressuring Congress into holding an OVERSIGHT HEARING on the FDA's Illegal Trilateral Cooperation Charter with Canada and Mexico. This FDA move is part of an effort [by drug companies] to force the USA into a planned North American Union [that makes Codex the law].
.
[So talk to Congress, not to the FDA or Codex or other bureaucrats, who only listen to big business.]
.
The biggest vitamin companies [in the drug-company-]dominated Vitamin Trade Associations [want Codex as a means to reduce competition from smaller nutrition companies].
.
[NSF & CFH promote the WTO]. Since when has the WTO been concerned with scientific honesty? The Natural Solutions Foundation and Citizens for Health cannot supply us with any evidence that the WTO's highly biased Dispute Settlement Panels have EVER based their decision-making on sound science.
.
Lori Wallach, JD, Director of the Global Trade Watch Division of Public Citizen, however, has testified before the House Ways and Means Committee that the WTO has ruled against the [US public] in 42 out of 48 cases, including EVERY case impacting our environmental and public health laws (Testimony of Lori Wallach, JD, Director  of the Global Trade Watch division of Public Citizen before the House Ways & Means Committee May 17,05 http://www.citizen.org/documents/Wallach%205.17.2005.pdf )
.
Given the total non-transparency [secrecy] of these [Dispute Settlement Panels] and the fact that they don't follow US rules of evidence [designed to prevent bias and fraud], given that the WTO has never given a private citizen standing to appear before a Dispute panel to provide testimony, given that the WTO has even made unfair, unethical rulings against STATE laws, on what BELIEVABLE, FACTUAL BASIS do the Natural Solutions Foundation & Citizens for Health continue to maintain that a nation adopting the "International Dietary Supplement Act" model legislation [which includes Codex] would be exempt from the imposition of WTO trade sanctions?

---

Ahhh...imagining that irresistible "new car" smell?
Check out new cars at Yahoo! Autos.