Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
rosacea-support · Rosacea, more than just a red face !
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Hear how Yahoo! Groups has changed the lives of others. Take me there.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Dr Nase or others - Pre Rosacea   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #66664 of 104842 |
Re: Dr Nase or others - Pre Rosacea



Hello,

There is no perfect answer. There is one logical answer. I have
known pre-rosacea flushers who have stayed in pre-rosacea for
40years. The answer you are looking for is if your flushing
intensity or duration to a known trigger gets worse over time, then
you are progressing.

Dr. Geoffrey Nase
http://www.drnase.com



> I'm not sure if I can adequately word this question that I have in
a
> manner which will actually make sense but I'll give it a crack.
>
> In your post to myself, madamzara and Jay, you mention 'that you
> believe in treating rosacea in the pre rosacea stage but you first
> must meet the criteria.'
>
> Now I don't know about anyone else but when I was in the pre-
rosacea
> stage, not only did I not know what on earth rosacea was, but I
> thought that flushing and blushing were pretty normal reactions
that
> we all have in certain situations.
>
> I would hazard a guess that if I mentioned to any of my friends
and
> family who blush and flush often, that they may be pre disposed to
> developing rosacea at some stage, I think they'd look at me as if
I
> was talking in tongues.
>
> You say that 'for a person to develop rosacea, he or she must have
> both phenomenon occur; frequent facial flushing and the inability
of
> facial blood vessels to handle the increase in blood flow. A
person
> who just experiences one of these abnormalities will not develop
> rosacea'.
>
> You mention that 'Subjects who flush often but don't experience
> vascular damage and dysfunction, will not advance into true
rosacea'.
>
> You also mention that 'Subjects who have structural damage to
their
> facial blood vessels but don't flush often, will not develop true
> rosacea'.
>
> So how does one evaluate that they have pre-rosacea and may
progress
> to the next stage, when many if not all of pre-rosaceans never
really
> realise that they have a problem until they've progressed into the
> next stage?
>
> Does that mean that even if I was knowledgable enough to know that
I
> had pre-rosacea and was pre disposed to developing it, there
really
> isn't any escaping it because at some stage, despite my vigilance,
I
> would still develop it through the many triggers we are subjected
to.
>
> How many people actually know that they have pre-rosacea? I look
> around and as B mentioned in one of her posts, I see dozens of
people
> in various stages of rosacea.
>
> I don't want to harp on this but you mentioned that it would be
wise
> to follow Jay's advice and not get laser treatment if you have the
> type of pre-rosacea that passes quickly. But what sort of person
with
> pre-rosacea who flushes once or twice a day for less than half an
> hour, be looking to laser as a treatment option for in the first
> place? And would they even know to look at this forum for advice.
A
> few may but I believe many only take action when it leaps into the
> mild stage. Unless they are having facial laser treatment for
> something other than rosacea, then I get it.
>
> I guess this convoluted message is trying to say that even if we
are
> perceptive enough to pick up pre-rosacea symptoms, how do we make
> sure that we are not pre-disposed to it and what can we do to
retard
> it's onset and finally develop it at some stage, to some degree?
>
> Is it a given, that if you meet the previous 2 criteria for
> developing rosacea that Dr Nase mentions, then eventually one day
or
> another it will eventually get you, no matter how diligent we are?
>
> My derms and docs couldn't diagnose me when I had severe rosacea
so
> what hope do we have of being diagnosed in the pre-rosacea stage?
>
> I didn't even know what rosacea was when I was a pre-rosacean. I
have
> 3 friends and many family members whom I have asked and none of
them
> know about what rosacea is. I can see that they all display
classic
> rosacea signs but when I tell them that they may be pre-disposed
to
> it when they blush or flush, it's totally ignored.
>
> So how do you know that you have pre-rosacea unless you progress
to
> the next stage? Who warns you about pre-rosacea and what it may
lead
> to.
>
> I would love to hear from Dr Nase and others on this subject as I
> feel that I literally went from pre to severe rosacea almost
> overnight.
>
> So if there are any pre-rosaceans out there, I'd love to hear your
> stories.
>
> Mermaid









Mon Jan 17, 2005 12:20 pm

drnase2000
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #66664 of 104842 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

I'm not sure if I can adequately word this question that I have in a manner which will actually make sense but I'll give it a crack. In your post to myself,...
mermaidcardone
Offline Send Email
Jan 17, 2005
11:48 am

Hello, There is no perfect answer. There is one logical answer. I have known pre-rosacea flushers who have stayed in pre-rosacea for 40years. The answer you...
Dr. Geoffrey Nase, PhD
drnase2000
Offline Send Email
Jan 17, 2005
1:26 pm

Mermaid i understand and share your want and need for clarification on this, i know that certain phrases that are banded around about rosacea are actually...
madamzara
Offline Send Email
Jan 17, 2005
5:07 pm
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help