For Everyone, 
There's a whole lot of new and consolidated info in the following letter, even
though, as usual on the [rosacea-cure] board, it's a bit more lengthy than I'd
like.  But I pray you'll take this reading-time to strengthen your knowledge of
this cure, so you can promote it in every way possible.  PLEASE COPY THE
FOLLOWING LETTER, AND SEND A COPY TO ANYONE WHO WILL LISTEN.  
Although it's not absolutely necessary, credible research would obviously speed
up the worldwide establishment of the realities of this cure's massive
potential.  So why is this cure being suppressed?  I had an epiphany recently,
listening to an interview with Michael Moore, who's currently promoting his
newest movie.  When he stated, (unequivocally), that one percent of the USA
population controls 95% of all wealth, property, power, etc, in the USA, all of
my "conspiracy theories" suddenly "clicked" into unequivocal reality.  I fancy
myself overly idealistic, (and even naive), so it has always been a mystery to
me, as to how it is, that so much unmitigated, unadulterated evil can prosper,
to create  the many, incredibly-evil "conspiracies" i believe exist.  But
suddenly, it all made ultimate, irrefutable sense.  Those one-percent, (i.e. ~3
million), people don't really set out to hurt anyone, (although "They" don't
care if "They" do); "They're" just following "Their" greed. 

And greed-based, self-centered actions can balloon into the most un-Godly,
cursed situations imaginable, even though each person taking part in those
actions can justify their own part in them.  So let's call these ~3 million
people "Greeders".  Now, instead of inadequate terms like "Big Pharma" and
"Status-Quo Enforcers", I can refer to the accurate source of these conspiracies
as "Greeders".  This intrinsically explains why "They" don't have to conspire,
to take part in any conspiracy, because "Their" greedy, self-centered motives
naturally align all "Their" actions and efforts, even if "They've" never even
met!!!  Oh, it's so deliciously complete and all-inclusively explanatory, to a
dedicated conspiracy-theorist such as myself.  I pray you can also appreciate
and enjoy it, dear Reader.  This clarification of the dark, stinking,
blood-soaked underbelly of mankind is good to have.  Let us not forget, that
these Greeders are so slimy, so odious, so cursedly evil, that they are no doubt
curing themselves with this cure, even as they intentionally condemn the rest of
mankind to rot with these incurable diseases, so that "They" can actually make
money by "treating" us in "Their" God-forsaken, so-called "healthcare $ystem".  

But what can be done, about the Greeders?  Poor, (actually rich), Marie
Antoinette was a Greeder.  Her blasé statement, "Let them eat cake", helped put
her on a guillotine.  In thinking about the reason for the use of the rather
gruesome guillotine in 1789 France, something odd occurred to me.  It's easy to
fake an execution, by hanging, by electrocution, by lethal injection, and even
by firing squad.  And even burning at the stake and public drowning could be
faked, with some smoke-and-mirror, magic tricks.  In all those cases, a
condemned person with unlimited resources could bribe his executioners, to fake
the execution and secretly free him to resume his life elsewhere, perhaps under
a new identity.  Being drawn and quartered would have made credible executions,
but that was just too messy and time-consuming.  So the guillotine became the
credible, even impersonal executioner, (unlike the theatrical, sword-loving
Muslims).  Oh yes, the
  French revolutionaries didn't really want to be gruesome about it, but because
they were dealing with great numbers of people who had great influence and
riches, (and "royal blood"), the irrefutably-credible guillotine became the
necessary choice, to rid themselves of this self-centered, criminally-avaricious
power-structure.  

Currently, in the USA, either the guillotines will be dusted off, or we'll have
to accept something new, (e.g. the Second Advent), to save these Greeders and to
save us all from such chaos and upheaval.  And lest the Greeders scoff, that
guillotines could never get "Them", let us not forget that hellish, wide-ranging
WMDs would do the job just as well, put in play by avid revolutionaries, from
Tim to Osama, and all those in between.  
But I digress, and I beg your pardon that it's such a gruesome digression.  :-)

I created the following letter for a friend of mine, who has been associated
with clinical research in the past.  I have little hope that they'll be
interested enough to actually do any studies on (DMSO + fluconazole), but I
found myself trying to create a universal letter that could be used now or in
the future, to try to inform and attract credible, OBJECTIVE researchers to work
on establishing this cure.  Of course, we definitely do not want research by
"rosacea-profiteers", or by anyone else trying to suppress this cure, (aka
Greeders).  
CERTAIN PERSONAL AND/OR SECRET INFORMATION HAS BEEN DELETED FROM THE FOLLOWING
LETTER, AND IT HAS BEEN EDITED, TO POST IT HERE ON THE [rosacea-cure] BOARD.  
God Bless, ITN & IDFN, 
Dave Fleming  ====> LETTER TO INSPIRE RESEARCH FOLLOWS ====>
=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+


[Dave Fleming wrote:]
Hi, Dr. X, 
I pray that you are able to take time to read the rather lengthy letter below,
because I believe this (DMSO + fluconazole) cure is so incredibly important, and
can be promoted best with at least some credible research.  This cure has
existed for years, but this inexpensive, topical, benign, self-diagnosing,
revolutionary cure has still not received the promotion it deserves.  I can only
emphasize, that this cure is the biggest medical breakthrough since penicillin,
bar none.  
But it's a hard sell, not only because of the difficulties in applying it, but
because of monstrous forces whose aim it is to maintain the $tatu$ quo of
$ickness.  

One justification that applies, for a "strong presentation" of this cure, is
that it will prevent and/or alleviate so much suffering.  But so-called
"Status-Quo Forces" seem to be suppressing this cure, and might attack anyone
who promotes it.  Such a "$tatus-quo-attack" seems possible, only because the
stakes are so high, because so much disease would be cured or prevented by the
widespread use of (DMSO + fluconazole), that a great number of doctor$ and other
businesses would go out of business, so to speak.  This would apply especially
to the entire dental and dermatological fields, and long-term, probably even to
many or all oncological and autoimmune diseases.  

The eight years of "Experiential Proof" on the [rosacea-cure] board leads to
Occam's-Razor claims which are quite substantial, as at:  
rosacea-cure : topical DMSO+FLUCONAZOLE to cure rosacea
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/

Following, is a consolidation of the most crucial facts about this cure:  

(1)  Fluconazole is the safest and most benign, (i.e. with zero or minimal
side-effects), of all of the ten drugs that fight fungus, as defined at:
Patient's overview of prescription drugs used to treat fungus and Candida yeast
infection
http://fungusfocus.com/html/prescription_drug_overview.htm
Reportedly, the UK and Australia, many years ago, made fluconazole legal without
any prescription.  It would be good to verify official proof of this
benign-status of fluconazole, ( in all other countries).  In addition, DMSO is
known to display amazingly-curative, in-vivo, synergistic, potentiating effects,
(e.g. effects that have been experienced with [DMSO + fluconazole + ibuprofen]),
which were established in a clinical study with anti-viral drugs in cats, as at:
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/193
http://www.dmso.org/articles/information/jacob.htm

(2)  The Suspicious History Of Fluconazole In The USA:
We find that fluconazole's patent expired circa 2005, and, Lo and Behold,
tweaking fluconazole created, (New and Improved!?!), voriconazole with a
brand-new patent expiring in 2019.  But fluconazole's price has somehow been
kept sky-high in the USA, and of course, voriconazole's price is also no-doubt
high.  Upon close inspection, we find that Big Pharma loves selling massive
amounts of these anti-fungals to chemotherapy-and-AIDS patients, simply to
suppress, (not cure), fungals, in immune-compromised patients.  The company,
"Spectrum", actually states on its website that its whole target has changed to
supplying the lucrative chemotherapy "industry".  So even though these
anti-fungals are available, Big Pharma is effectively, somehow, preventing
doctors from prescribing this benign, (DMSO + fluconazole + ibuprofen) cure for
patients who would be cured of incurable diseases by this
"topical-med-application and immune-system-action"-cycle cure.  When
  we realize, [as in (12), below], that we will VERY LIKELY prevent, arrest, or
cure many presently-idiopathic diseases, (with candidates such as arthritis,
lupus, colon cancer, premature-aging, and any disease that could be caused by
cascade-effects of the systemic, chronic-mycotoxins that would be eliminated),
we begin to perceive that Big Pharma actually KNOWS this med is curative, and
has THEREFORE been intentionally, methodically suppressing these curative
effects since fluconazole came on the market in the USA, in 1990.  It was
suspicious even then, that FDA approval seemed artificially delayed, as at:
(ATN) FLUCONAZOLE: Important Antifungal Approved
http://www.aegis.com/pubs/atn/1990/ATN09601.html
, because France and the UK had approved it in 1988.  
After this strange delay, the FDA included a contraindication-"Warning" of
"exfoliative skin disorders", "rashes", and "lesions", as at:
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/111
But knowing that such so-called "disorders" were site-specific and not
body-wide, means that whoever saw such so-labeled "disorders" knew very well,
(even in 1985 - 1990), that there was SOMETHING BEING CURED.  But Big Pharma
CHOSE to deceptively list this site-specific, obviously-curative effect of oral
fluconazole as a misleading "WARNING".  
To my knowledge, a USA doctor first prescribed (DMSO + 1% fluconazole + 2%
ibuprofen) for nail-fungus in 1998.  I actually found that doctor's contact info
circa 2004, but when I phoned him and praised him for "inventing" such an
amazingly-curative med, he acted very strange and paranoid about it, and he
didn't want to even talk about it....  I now believe that Big Pharma must have
put a real hurt on that doctor, to shut him up....  
Absolutely safe dosage-parameters have been established by the FDA, for (DMSO,
1970 FDA-approval), (ibuprofen, 1974 FDA-approval), and (fluconazole, 1990
FDA-approval).  Furthermore, (according to the rather perverse "prescription
system" in the USA), that means that any doctor can legally write any
prescription they choose to, containing these drugs, even if it is not a use
specifically approved by the FDA.  But for some "mysteriou$" reason we find that
USA doctor$ are refusing to write this curative prescription that patients need;
and when it rarely is written, they're cunningly limiting this med to
high-priced, 15-ml amounts, when "they" know very well that the "soak method"
needed for the most effective cures involves 50-ml or 100-ml amounts per
application, which can involve many, many liters of this med, as it is
topically-applied in occasional courses of treatment, (with the unabsorbed med
being discarded), over a period of months or years. 
  The "soak method" is described briefly, at:
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/287

(3)  DMSO not only transports about 10% of the topically-applied fluconazole
into the bloodstream, but also has the auspicious, inherent feature of
depositing a high-concentration reservoir of any drug, (i.e. in this case,
fluconazole), in the skin at the site of application.  Since these "disease
entities" are site-specific, they are exposed to a high-dose
reservoir-concentration of fluconazole, which, if it were body-wide in an
oral-fluconazole dose, would likely cause deleterious side-effects.  This means
that all the contraindications and/or side-effect cautions for conventional,
orally-administered fluconazole likely do not apply, (when [DMSO + fluconazole]
is used).  It also means that the "dead layer" of outer skin is "reached" by
(DMSO + fluconazole), but it cannot be "reached" by any oral drug in the
bloodstream.  This prevents the scenario of any oral drug leaving a
"remnant-infestation", which of course grows back as soon as the oral drug
  is discontinued, (from that dead-skin layer or nails, and from such
low-blood-flow locations as sinuses, nasal-cartilage, or the bone surrounding
the sinuses or in our toes or fingers, where these infestations typically grow).
 

(4)  SAFE DOSAGES:
IBUPROFEN:
The recommended safe dose of ibuprofen for adults is normally from 200 mg to 400
mg, every four to six hours, and one should not take more than 1,200 mg in a
24-hour period.  Since the ibuprofen-content of (DMSO + fluconazole + ibuprofen)
is kept so low, (i.e. 1%, which is 10 mg/ml, or less), it's easy to keep the
ibuprofen-content within safe parameters.  Its persistence in-vivo is assumed to
be minimal.  

DIMETHYLSULFOXIDE, (DMSO):
A clinical study done in 1967-68 gives us a comprehensive view of the absolute
safety of topically-applied DMSO.  One milliliter of liquid-DMSO equals 1.1
grams, (i.e. 1 ml = 1.1 gm).  They applied DMSO, in a massive dose of (1 gram
per kilogram of subject's body-weight), (i.e. 1 gm/kg), daily, for two weeks,
with no significant ill effects.  When this same massive (1 gm/kg) daily-dose
was continued every day for 90 days, only about half of the subjects had adverse
effects, and those effects were minor and temporary, as covered at:
http://www.dmso.org/articles/information/brobyn.html
Oral DMSO is also recommended as absolutely safe, from one-tablespoon to
one-ounce per day in a glass of juice, (i.e. from 15 ml to 30 ml, daily), in a
"Webmaster's Note" at the end of the article at:
http://www.dmso.org/articles/information/herschler.htm
After either topical or oral/INGESTED administration, DMSO freely passes
throughout the body, and reportedly, its persistence in-vivo is about four days,
with its metabolite, (DMSO2), persisting in the bloodstream for 16 days. 

FLUCONAZOLE, (GENERIC OF DIFLUCAN):
No safe-dosage information is available for topically-applied (DMSO +
fluconazole), so it is prudent to keep the fluconazole-content of the absorbed
topical-application less than the safe-dosages established for oral
fluconazole-capsules.  It is prudent to do the same when taking INGESTED/oral
(DMSO + fluconazole).  
A course of two weeks of daily oral-doses of fluconazole-capsules is "commonly
acceptable", although fluconazole is so persistent that high, one-dose
applications are also being used.  Also "commonly acceptable" is long-term,
(i.e. longer than two-weeks), daily oral-doses, when the patient is monitored
for any possible liver damage, which would signal using a lower dose or stoppage
of use.  For either two-weeks or long-term, two dosage-levels are "commonly
acceptable": 4oo mg/day or 800 mg/day.  The 400 mg/day dose translates to 6 mg
per kilogram of body-weight for an "average-weight patient", (i.e. 68 kg or 150
Lbs).  The 800 mg/day dose translates to 12 mg per kilogram of body-weight for
an "average-weight patient", (i.e. 68 kg or 150 Lbs).  On the first day of oral
dosing, a "loading dose" of twice the daily dose is taken: (i.e. one 12 mg/kg
dose followed by 6-mg/kg daily-doses, OR, one 24 mg/kg dose followed by 12-mg/kg
daily-doses).  In addition, much higher doses of fluconazole have been used with
selected patients, with no ill effects.  
PERSISTENCE OF FLUCONAZOLE IN-VIVO:
Fluconazole is exceptionally long-lived in the body, (reportedly ~16 days), and
most is excreted unchanged, (i.e. not metabolized), in the urine.  Fluconazole's
~16-day, in-vivo persistence fits in well with the site-specific
reservoir-effect and the
["treat-with-med-and-WAIT-to-complete-immune-system-action"] optimum-mode that
experiential proof has established for cures with ([10%-water/90%-DMSO] + 10%
fluconazole + 1% ibuprofen), (i.e. 100 mg fluconazole per ml, and 10 mg
ibuprofen per ml).  
PRESCRIBED (FLUCONAZOLE 1% SOLUTION), (i.e. in DMSO, and called "Nail Paint"):
This prescription, (i.e. [DMSO + 1% fluconazole + 2% ibuprofen]), has been
prescribed only for nail fungus, (since 1998), and typically does not even
mention DMSO, (obviously because of the history of malevolent disinformation,
about DMSO).  So by design, the doctor and Compounding Pharmacist know that
"Nail Paint" is made with DMSO, but the patient is kept ignorant of this fact,
unless they inquire quite specifically about it.  It comes in a 15-ml, glass
bottle with a small applicator-brush, attached to the inside of the screw-off
cap.   The directions for usage, (i.e. "DOSAGE"), are: "Apply twice a day, for
six weeks".  This is 2 times 42 days, (i.e. 84 applications), so if we divide
15-ml by 84, we find that the "DOSAGE" is expected to be no more than 0.178 ml
per application, applying no more than 0.357 ml per day.  I found that this
"DOSAGE" only cured the apparent nail-fungus, but did not cure the ROOT CAUSE of
the nail-fungus, which was
  deeper, in the toe.  So the nail fungus I "cured" grew back, within a couple of
years.  However, when I used the "soak method", I used ~40 ml of
([10%-water/90%-DMSO] + 10% fluconazole + 1% ibuprofen), only on my left foot. 
I put my left foot in a plastic bag in the evening at home with the ~40 ml of
med, and I soaked it about 7 hours, since it was easy to walk around in
flip-flop sandals, as I describe at:
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/287
I observed a quarter-moon-shaped, FIRST-TIER inflammation, [as described in
(11), below], above the toenail, and other infestations in the foot.  There was
no sensation or discomfort, other than an insignificant, "vague soreness" in an
8-square-inch area in the arch of the foot, which did not hamper my walking, and
went away within a couple of days.  For two months, there was significant
peeling/sloughing of skin on the foot, with some minor peeling even extending
through six months, since I occasionally followed up with brush-applied med, on
the toenail and on other parts of the foot that had shown FIRST-TIER
inflammation.  Most importantly, a year later, the left-foot nail has finally
been 100% cured, showing no sign of infestation, while the big toenail on my
right foot is still clearly infested and remains to be cured.  My belief is that
this "foot-soak method" should be used BY EVERY ADULT HUMAN ON EARTH, (and many
children, as well), perhaps
  once a week, for two months, or perhaps once a month, for six months, [or
perhaps more often, within the safe dosages established for topical-DMSO in (4),
above], as an absolutely effective cure for these types of infestation, which no
doubt infest every adult human on earth.  These previously-incurable,
typically-stealthy "foot-infestations" are KNOWN to secret chronic, (i.e.
decades-long), mycotoxins systemically, which LIKELY CAUSE cascade-effect,
presently-idiopathic diseases such as arthritis, lupus, colon cancer,
premature-aging, and many other candidate-diseases.  


>>>Editor's Note: A compounding pharmacist ran an experiment, and he found that
the "saturation point", (i.e. the most that could be dissolved), of fluconazole
in 100%-DMSO is 63%, or 630 mg fluconazole per ml of DMSO.  So it is possible
that higher than 10% concentrations, (i.e. greater than 100 mg per ml of DMSO),
of fluconazole might be more curative.  Since both the presence of 10%-water and
of 1%-ibuprofen would change that 63% saturation point of fluconazole, only
experimentation would tell us the actual saturation point in the completed med. 
But when ([10%-water/90%-DMSO] + 50% fluconazole + 1% ibuprofen) is applied
topically, a great amount of white powder, (i.e. fluconazole), was left
unabsorbed, on the skin.  So even though the "10%-fluconazole" concentration is
indeed almost completely arbitrary, and determined to some degree by the high
cost of fluconazole, it has had a very effective, curative result that is much
greater than the 1%-fluconazole concentration had.  
When using this med as a "mouth-soak", I kept it in my mouth as long as
possible, and the amount of saliva grew within ~15 minutes, to fill my mouth
completely.  Because of this extreme dilution by the saliva, it is probably good
to use the med with 100%DMSO and a high percentage of fluconazole, such as,
([100%-DMSO] + 25% fluconazole + 1% ibuprofen), or even possibly ([100%-DMSO] +
50% fluconazole + 1% ibuprofen), and spit out the med, rather than swallowing
it.  
It was logical to try out a ([10%-water/90%-DMSO] + 25% fluconazole + 1%
ibuprofen) med in a "nasal-soak" usage, because less volume of med was needed,
and the nasal mucus-production otherwise tended to dilute and flush out the
med.  For the "nasal soak", the patient has to learn how to voluntarily keep the
nasal passageway closed to the throat while lying down, breathing only through
the mouth.  Also, once the med is in, foam-rubber stoppers in both nostrils can
be used, so the patient can sit up and keep the med "soaking" longer, (e.g. 30
to 60 minutes).  To prevent the foam from absorbing the med, cover it with the
plastic-wrap used in microwave cooking, and secure that with two-inch-wide,
clear tape, on the part outside the nose, which also allows a path for air to
leave the foam, so it can be compressed to fit the nostril.  When disease is
present, this "nasal soak" is normally very painful, which means that the
patient tended to delay treatments, (for many months at a time, since ~2006),
and thereby delay the 100%-cure, because of the curative improvements created in
the nasal condition by the med applications accomplished, (i.e. it ended
sleep-apnea, if the patient lies on his back and uses no pillow).  Also, delay
made some sense, since the new nasal-cartilage grows so slowly, to replace that
which has been harmed by the disease.  (Plastic surgeons tend to deceive you
about this, but "swelling" is "normal", even a year or longer after you have
rhinoplasty-surgery involving your nasal cartilage.)  See "Rhinoplasty
Surgeon's-Disclaimer", as at:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/290
Since one can choose to INGEST whatever med is not absorbed nasally, (rather
than snorting it out, as can be done), we can also calculate what percentage of
fluconazole to use in the med, based on the patient's weight, and the
mg-of-fluconazole-per-kilogram-of-body-weight total-dose they will be INGESTING,
after holding it in the nose for a reasonable time, (i.e. 15 to 30 minutes).   

(5) EXCIPIENTS, AND PRICES:
FYI, the excipients found in fluconazole capsules are:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/170
FLUCONAZOLE TABLETS, (pink in color):  
MICROCRYSTALLINE CELLULOSE, DIBASIC CALCIUM PHOSPHATE ANHYDROUS, POVIDONE,
CROSCARMELLOSE SODIUM, FD&C RED NUMBER 40 ALUMINUM LAKE DYE, AND MAGNESIUM
STEARATE. [2]
============================================
http://home.intekom.com/pharm/pfizer/diflu150.html
Diflucan Capsules 150 mg contain the following inactive ingredients: 
lactose, maize starch, colloidal silicone dioxide, magnesium stearate and sodium
lauryl sulphate, ---->, (discarded ingredients, not put in DMSO), ---> in a hard
gelatin capsule with titanium dioxide and patent blue as colourants. 

It's obvious that we don't want the "RED DYE" in the tablets being
DMSO-transported into our skin, (especially facially), even though it's in
miniscule amounts, and is NOT proven to stay, (i.e. like a tattoo).  The capsule
excipient-ingredients are also not ideal, but are allowable.  My first couple of
prescriptions were pink, (i.e. made from tablets), and it had no ill-effects. 
And a couple of my later Rxs had "sediment" in the bottom of the bottle, that
was transparent and stuck to the bottom, (perhaps silicon dioxide???).  Those
Rxs seemed to work fine, with no adverse effects.  However, it is obviously
ideal and highly desirable to eliminate such "excipients" from our DMSO-meds,
because we know that at least a few molecules of them are being "transported"
into our skin, with a little even entering our bloodstream. 
That said, capsule prices vary astronomically, 
from $2.15-per-gram at (Costco.com, 90 x 200mg capsules for $38.66), 
to $44.16-per-gram at the highest-priced source, (7 x 200mg capsules for
$62.13).
I know of only two companies, (although there may be more), that supply the
bulk, white-powder fluconazole, (which presumably contains zero other
ingredients):  Spectrum, and PCCA.  Although they do everything possible to keep
their prices to pharmacists secret, I discovered those prices, back in 2005.  In
June 2005, they were as follows, as at:
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/269

Upon examination, the suppliers are charging 5.5 to more than 9 TIMES AS MUCH,
for small quantities of bulk fluconazole powder, than for large quantities. 
Here's the breakdown:
one kilogram = 1,000 grams, (gm) = 1,000,000 milligrams, (mg)
[DMSO + 10% fluconazole] contains 100 mg per ml of DMSO, so a 15 ml Rx contains
1,500 mg, (i.e. 1.5 gm),  fluconazole, and the
[DMSO + 50% fluconazole] contains 500 mg per ml of DMSO, so a 15 ml Rx contains
7,500 mg, (i.e. 7.5 gm), fluconazole.  

PCCA's prices for  bulk powder-fluconazole:
25 grams to CPs was $125.00, (price per gram = $5)
one kilogram to CPs was $900.00, (price per gram = 90 cents)

Spectrum's prices for bulk powder-fluconazole:
25 grams to CPs was $159.00, (price per gram = $6.36)
100 grams to CPs was $459.00, (price per gram = $4.59)
1 Kilogram costs CPs $695.00, (price per gram =  69 cents)

If we do the math, PCCA's price/mg of 25 grams was 5.6 times the price/mg of one
kilogram, (with even the price for one kilogram being substantially higher), and
Spectrum's price/mg of 25 grams is 9.2 times the price/mg of one kilogram.
I haven't checked PCCA, but as of June 2009, Spectrum's price for one kilogram
of fluconazole, ($695), is exactly what it was in 2005, even though the patent
on fluconazole expired in 2005.  So the price has been kept untra-inflated.  
Following this "price-gouging" path leads us to simply try to get a
prescription, (fat chance, in the USA), for one kilogram of bulk
powder-fluconazole, (which normally should have no excipients).  Perversely, USA
drug-supply companies are selling one kg of fluconazole at one-fifth to
one-ninth the price, per gram, as when 25 grams or 100 grams are bought by the
pharmacists!!!  Unless they are creating meds for cattle or horses, compounding
pharmacists usually do not buy fluconazole by the kilogram, because
vaguely-defined, (and yet strictly-enforced), completely arbitrary
expiration-dates by the FDA force the pharmacist to throw away whatever
fluconazole they don't use immediately, into the garbage!!!  But a group of
patients could band together, with one doctor prescribing a kilogram of
fluconazole to be shared by them all, through one pharmacist.  I had to get my
Rx filled by faxing it over a thousand miles, to Texas, where the compounder
there was charging only one-tenth what a local compounder was asking.  We find
that a comprehensive list of all USA compounding-pharmacists is kept absolutely,
criminally secret, because your local compounder wants to keep you captive to
his high prices, without competition from any other compounders.  You can judge
whether that's why the IACP therefore MAKES IT IMPOSSIBLE for you to obtain any
list of all USA compounding pharmacists, when you go to (www.iacprx.org) and
click on "FIND A COMPOUNDING PHARMACIST", as at:
International Academy of Compounding Pharmacists:
http://www.iacprx.org/site/PageServer?pagename=lookup_survey
???  Welcome to one exposé of the crooked, thieving, fleecing, USA-healthcare
"system".<<<[End Of Editor's Note]  

(6)  Unfortunately, (or perhaps fortunately), the possible extrapolations and
permutations of the (DMSO + drug) cure are vast in number, including not only
topically-applied dosage-determinations, but the INGESTION/oral route as well. 
Also, we do not know, whether a FUNGICIDAL drug, (which fluconazole is not),
would work better.  But it's very important to note that fluconazole is very
unusual, in that it freely penetrates the "blood-brain barrier", (which means it
no doubt freely passes into all parts of the body), and it is also very
long-lived in the body.  It's likely that no other drug has such positive,
curative attributes, and is so safe.  In any case, my positive, 8-year
experience with (DMSO + fluconazole + ibuprofen), (both topical and
INGESTED/oral), is ironclad-proof, (to me), of the 100%-SAFE cure of
previously-incurable, common diseases that infest every human being.  

(7)  Amazingly, this (DMSO + fluconazole) med is self-diagnosing.  Since it is
so benign, and has virtually zero effects on healthy tissue, we can treat
preemptively/prophylactically, thus "discovering", (through the changes caused
in the diseased tissue),  previously stealthy  or ill-defined disease-sites.  So
we can cure ourselves, even without the "help/diagnosis" of any doctor.  Because
of the unique, transdermally-transportive properties of DMSO, (but actually
because of the greater profits they make), some doctors may opt to apply (DMSO +
fluconazole) only in-clinic, as they hide there greed with the plausible
deniability of claiming that a patient might possibly use this ultra-benign med
incorrectly at home.  

(8)  After being applied topically, and especially after being INGESTED, (DMSO +
fluconazole + ibuprofen) might maintain some sort of synergistic, curative
relationship throughout the body.  And it's even possible that oral fluconazole,
oral ibuprofen, (and even oral DMSO), taken separately, (even at the same time),
might not have that curative relationship.  Of course, no understanding of such
a synergistic relationship need exist, for cures to be effected with (DMSO +
fluconazole), (possibly plus ibuprofen).  As stated in (1), above, this kind of
synergism was proven, as at:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/193
http://www.dmso.org/articles/information/jacob.htm
In 2003, I asked my Compounding Pharmacist why he included ibuprofen, and he
said, "to enhance/increase absorption".  This reason never made much sense to
me, since ibuprofen is an analgesic and anti-inflammatory drug, but that was the
reason he gave me.  I recently went looking, (to better clarify this letter),
and found that fluconazole and ibuprofen do indeed appear to have some sort of
unique, complex, biomedical relationship which is way over my head.  In hopes
that they might interest any researcher, there are two pertinent documents at:
http://www.ncbi.nim.nih.gov/pubmed/16723553
and at:
http://dmd.aspetjournals.org/cgi/reprint/dmd.108.022970v1.pdf

(9)  There is a very minor, inconsequential amount of heat produced, when water
and DMSO combine.  Combining 10% water with 100% DMSO, in a 15 ml glass bottle,
creates heat that is barely discernible to your palm, tightly holding the
bottle; thereafter, adding more water does not produce any more heat.  Part of
my first experience with using the [(100%-DMSO) + (1% fluconazole)] prescription
on my face, was that some (pleasant) heat occurred on my face when there was
sweat/water there, (such as when I applied the med just after taking a warm
shower).  A couple of years later, after starting the [rosacea-cure]
Yahoo-group, I learned from some literature at (www.dmso.org) that
topically-applied [(10%water / 90%DMSO) + (drug)] actually causes a higher
blood-serum concentration of (drug), than does topically-applied [(100%DMSO) +
(drug)].  The literature states that this is anti-intuitive, but found it to be
true in clinical studies.  Therefore, I began
  recommending using [(10%water / 90%DMSO) + fluconazole], rather than using
[(100%DMSO) + fluconazole].  But since the reservoir-effect, high-concentration
of drug at the site of application is most important, (not necessarily
blood-serum concentration), [100%DMSO + fluconazole] might be slightly better. 
I have found that, when filling up my nasal passageways with a maximum of 20 ml
of med, there is a whole lot of mucus produced which dilutes and interferes
with, (i.e. flushes out), the med.  Therefore, I've contemplated that using the
[100%DMSO + fluconazole] might be better nasally, since it would combine with
the water-content of the mucus, and possibly create a greater reservoir-effect
concentration of fluconazole in the nasal passageways and sinus cavities, (even
though some minor heat would be produced there).  Undoubtedly, either usage
creates the cure, although one may be more effective.  In fact, even after over
11,000 clinical studies on DMSO, over a period of 40 years, such mysteries,
concerning the "mechanisms" of DMSO, still exist. Being commonly available, DMSO
could not be patented, so the drug companies have attacked/smeared it and tried
to create some drug with the same properties, (for patented profit), but they've
failed, even to this day.  DMSO remains absolutely unique, with a history of
disinformation deceptively misrepresenting DMSO.  

(10)  BREATH ODOR, WITH DMSO USE:  
Experiential research, (malevolently, incorrectly labeled as
unreliable/"anecdotal" by Big Pharma), can be valid, convincing, and most
importantly, repeatable.  And it's important to note that pompous, so-called
"double-blind" clinical-research with DMSO has been hampered by an otherwise
unimportant side-effect of DMSO use, as stated at:  
http://www.dmso.org/articles/information/muir.htm
There, Maya Muir wrote:  "Others cite DMSO's principal side effect: an odd odor,
akin to that of garlic, that emanates from the mouth shortly after use, even if
use is through the skin. Certainly, this odor has made double-blinded studies
difficult. Such studies are based on the premise that no one, neither doctor nor
patient, knows which patient receives the drug and which the placebo, but this
drug announces its presence within minutes."
The miniscule amounts needed, (of topically-applied [DMSO + fluconazole +
ibuprofen]), to effect most of these cures, have produced zero or undetectable
"garlic-breath odor".  But in many cases, more of this med is needed, and is
administered both topically and as INGESTED/oral med.  Of course, this so-called
"garlic breath" is very brief and inconsequential, except as an annoyance to
those living/sleeping with the patient.  

(11)  When we discuss this cure, we must clarify two "different kinds/stages" of
inflammation: (let's call them FIRST-TIER and SECOND-TIER).  Since the
ROOT-CAUSE "entities", (which appear to be fungal), apparently are parasitic,
they are never "stopped" by any means other than this (DMSO + fluconazole)
cure.  Such "stealthy" infestations do finally "cause" inflammation, (after one
or two decades of slow growth), by doing so much physical damage to the human
cells at their "root/start sites", that our immune system begins to attack these
human cells, in order to deconstruct and remove them.  The so-called
"treatments/controls" for this SECOND-TIER inflammation do nothing to the ROOT
CAUSE of the problem, but rather simply suppress inflammation, while the
ROOT-CAUSE "entities" continue to grow and flourish.  Once this (DMSO +
fluconazole) med is used, it apparently "strips/disrupts" the cell-wall
ergosterol of the ROOT-CAUSE "entities", laying them open for the first time to
an attack from our immune system, which creates a FIRST-TIER inflammation.  This
FIRST-TIER inflammation must be allowed, and, depending on how extensively the
ROOT-CAUSE "entities" are established, this will entail few or many applications
of the med, with waiting periods for our immune system to remove the ROOT-CAUSE
"entities", along with any human cells they've damaged.  Since new tissue must
grow, to replace that which is damaged, many weeks or months may be necessary,
for these repetitive med-application-and-waiting cycles to be complete.  Soft
tissue takes the least time to grow back, but if the ROOT-CAUSE entities have
infested bone or cartilage, (such as around the sinuses, or in the toes or
fingers), this takes much longer to grow back, even approaching one or two years
of occasional med-applications, (ideally using the "soak-method").  
At some point, all of the ROOT-CAUSE "entities" will have been removed by the
combination of med applications and our immune-system action, and any further
application of the med will no longer cause any "reaction", thus defining the
end-point of this (DMSO + fluconazole) cure.  

(12)  It is impressive to experience the direct cures of chronic, (sometimes
stealthy and sometimes obviously-debilitating), fungal diseases as proven fact,
with (DMSO + fluconazole).  But we should be truly awestruck, when we realize
the huge potential these primary, fungal diseases have, to have caused
cascade-effect, idiopathic diseases with the chronic mycotoxins they secrete
into the bloodstream for decades, even before any discernible/identifiable
fungal-symptoms occur.  The vast realm of idiopathic diseases which might be
indirectly prevented, arrested, and/or cured, as a direct result of directly
curing seemingly-unrelated diseases such as nail fungus, sinusitis, rhinophyma,
and countless skin-diseases, is simply astounding to contemplate.  

(13)  VECTORS/SOURCES AND MECHANISMS OF CONTRACTING THESE (PROBABLY)-FUNGAL
INFESTATIONS:
As an aside, we can guess at the "causes/vectors" of these apparently-fungal
infestations.  If we compare this to mold/fungus on an apple, we get some
clues.  Normally, it is a physical "break/bruise" in the skin of a fruit which
immediately allows fungus to grow.  So the dry skin of the apple obviously has
some natural resistance to the fungus, although "one bad apple" can spoil an
entire barrel of apples, given enough time for the foothold-fungus to spread
from the "bruised and infested" apple, with all the moisture that is released
from the first infested fruit.  
In any case, we can extrapolate that "breaks in our skin" would be one means for
"fungal infestations" to occur.  And where do such "breaks" occur?  Perhaps the
least realized, but most obvious place, is our scalp and face, from the work of
"public barbers".  When they shave us, it is likely that we are contaminated by
whatever diseases all their other customers have, since barbers do not use
autoclaves, which is the only means of killing fungal spores.  This may explain
the mystery that many more men suffer with rhinophyma than do women.  Also, even
when we shave our own faces daily, we constantly create microscopic "breaks" in
our skin, which make us vulnerable to these "fungal infestations".  Another
obvious place, is our feet, complicated by the fact that mankind began to wear
socks and shoes, providing the dark, moist environment where fungus thrives.  A
third, less obvious place, is in our mouth, given the rough, sharp edges of some
of our
  food.  Our hands and arms are also normally "scratched", by our everyday
activities.  If we have common, endocrine-related, teenage "acne-vulgaris", that
causes breaks in our skin which, if fungally infested, would finally show
symptoms 15 years (or more) later.  Apparel such as wired-bras or pants with
rough-sewn crotches can cause chafing,  (i.e. breaks in the skin).
Animals, (especially in-house pets), are an obvious source of infestation, which
would be transmitted to our nasal mucus-membranes and/or eyes very easily by
manual contact.  It is especially intriguing, that the life-span of these
animals is the same time-period that such fungal infestations typically grow
stealthily, before showing the "Second-Tier" symptoms defined in (11), above. 
This means that these animals could easily be a permanent, cyclical-repository
of such transmittable "fungal disease", even getting it from their progenitors
at birth, with each animal dying before they ever show symptoms.  In fact, even
we humans may be passing such infestations from mother to child, at birth or
thereafter.  Although it's a cliche, public toilet-seats, and even toilet paper,
(especially if it's made in China, as were recently-exposed eye-drops
contaminated with fungal disease), are obviously possible sources of this type
of infestation.  It's
  significant that asians use floor-slot toilets, (not seats), and they are
taught to stretch their leg muscles as children to sit-squat, flat-footed, so
they never touch the toilet, and therefore avoid this sort of contact-disease. 
Our entire groin area is obviously vulnerable, since it is kept out of the
sunlight and is always moist. When I applied this med to my entire left arm,
from shoulder to fingers, I "discovered" that nine small, (i.e. ~4 mm diameter),
scabs appeared, at the top of my arm, where hypodermic-needle shots would have
been given.  Although I do not remember getting that many shots, (but I was
hospitalized with a serious disease when I was three years old), I'm convinced
that even sterile hypodermic-needles can cause this type of fungal infestation,
because they normally "push" whatever is on your skin, (even after an
alcohol-cotton-swab rub, which does not kill fungus), into your skin, where it
can begin to grow parasitically. 
  Again obviously, any dental procedure that "breaks the mucus-membrane" in your
mouth, (even just "cleaning your teeth"), likely causes this sort of "fungal
infestation".  Since noticeable symptoms will not occur until over a decade
later though, (i.e. you can't prove they caused it), dentists don't worry about
this, and they can make more money when they "surgically treat" your fungal
"gingivitis", which they caused.  Any other type of surgery, (done by any
doctor), also opens you to this type of "fungal infestation", since the measures
they take to keep things sterile do not eliminate these omnipresent
"fungal-entities".  The entire GI tract, (gastrointestinal tract), is also
suspect to foster these "fungal entities", because its mucus membranes are
always moist and dark, and food undoubtedly can contain such "entities".  For
example, no one knows the cause of so-called "pre-cancerous polyps" in the
colon, and medical-white-coat claims not
  withstanding, no one knows that "snipping them off", (i.e. simplistically
cutting off only what is visually apparent, leaving the "polyps'-roots" behind),
treats or prevents colon cancer.  
<=>+<=>+<=>+<=>END OF LIST OF (13)<=>+<=>+<=>+<=>+<=>

This med's potential for cure is massive.  I believe that every adult needs this
med, at the very least, for (often stealthy) foot infestations.  And my strong
suspicion, is that the great majority of ALL dental problems are
preventable/curable with this med, since the most serious dental problems
originate in "gingivitis", which I know are now curable with this med.  BTW, the
lesions that are RARELY revealed/caused by both this SECOND-TIER and FIRST-TIER
inflammation may cause minor vulnerability to bacterial infestations, which can
then become involved in dental or sinus problems, and confuse the perceived
mechanisms of the disease and of the cure.  
In addition, so much money is being made by those who "treat" facial problems,
which are so astronomically important to us as "social creatures".  Again, my
strong suspicion is that most facial problems will be cured with this med,
although the FIRST-TIER inflammation that is a necessary part of this cure does
discourage people from using it.  

As further "food for thought", see the "sinusitis-inflammation" references at:
http://www.princeton.edu/~gpmenos/mold_facts/MayoClinicStudyImplicatesFungusasCa\
useofChronicSinusi.pdf
----------------------------------------------
http://www3.jsonline.com/story/index.aspx?id=108386
----------------------------------------------
For an important third document, see the file, "Assembled Info On DMSO",
in the "FILES" section of the [rosacea-cure] board.
----------------------------------------------

It might seem curiously off-topic, that I've maintained a reference to an
article about "sinusitis inflammation" on the [rosacea-cure] home-page, from
2003 until the present, but I believe it is definitely on-topic, since rosacea
is part of this "mysterious sinusitis-inflammation".  The statement by the
Mayo-Clinic, Rochester, in Sept. 1999, was, "(We) estimate that it will be at
least two years before a treatment will be widely available". 
If we inject this (DMSO + fluconazole) cure-scenario into the "sinusitis
question", we can see why the Mayo Clinic still has not produced the "treatment"
they predicted within two years, (i.e. by 2002).  Simply stated, infested
sinuses, bone, and cartilage simply do not lend themselves to being cured within
the short-term "clinical studies" they habitually use, or the
orally-administered-drug regimen to which they no-doubt limit themselves.  By
failing to understand the ROOT-CAUSE and cascade-effect natures of this
"sinusitis mystery", they will no doubt continue to bark up the wrong trees,
(either unintentionally, or, bowing to the $tatus-quo force$, intentionally).  

Objective research is needed, to publicly substantiate this cure beyond all
doubt.  Who knows, maybe the NIH would fund it, and shatter my substantial
pessimism about our USA so-called "healthcare" system, which in fact
clandestinely promotes $ickness.  

God Bless, ITN & IDFN, 
Dave Fleming


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Editor's Note: This surgeon's-disclaimer for rhinoplasty is clearly deceptive,
concerning the time it can take to heal, after the surgery.  See below, the term
"LONG TIME", which should read "over a year"; but the choice has obviously been
made to deceive the patient.]


INFORMED CONSENT - RHINOPLASTY SURGERY


INSTRUCTIONS:
This is an informed-consent document that has been prepared to assist your
plastic surgeon inform you, concerning rhinoplasty surgery, its risks, and
alternative treatment.

It is important that you read this information carefully and completely. Please
initial each page, indicating that you have read the page, and sign the consent
for surgery, as proposed.

INTRODUCTION:
Surgery of the nose, (rhinoplasty), is an operation frequently performed by
plastic surgeons. This surgical procedure can produce changes in the appearance,
structure, and function, of the nose. Rhinoplasty can reduce or increase the
size of the nose, change the shape of the tip, narrow the width of the nostrils,
or change the angle between the nose and the upper lip. This operation can help
correct birth defects, nasal injuries, and help relieve some breathing
problems. 

There is not a universal type of rhinoplasty surgery that will meet the needs of
every patient. Rhinoplasty surgery is customized for each patient, depending on
his or her needs. Incisions may be made within the nose or concealed in
inconspicuous locations of the nose, in the open-rhinoplasty procedure. Internal
nasal surgery, to improve nasal breathing, can be performed at the time of the
rhinoplasty. 

The best candidates for this type of surgery are individuals who are looking for
improvement, not perfection, in the appearance of their nose. In addition to
realistic expectations, good health and psychological stability are important
qualities for a patient considering rhinoplasty surgery. Rhinoplasty can be
performed in conjunction with other surgeries. 

ALTERNATIVE TREATMENT:
Alternative forms of management consist of not undergoing the rhinoplasty
surgery. Certain internal nasal-airway disorders may not require surgery on the
exterior of the nose. Risks and potential complications are also associated with
alternative forms of treatment that involve surgery, such as septoplasty, to
correct nasal-airway disorders. 

RISKS OF RHINOPLASTY SURGERY:
With any type of activity there is inherent risk. An individual's choice to
undergo a surgical procedure is based on the comparison, of the risk to
potential benefit. Although the majority of patients do not experience these
complications, you should discuss each of them with your plastic surgeon to make
sure you understand the risks, potential complications and consequences, of
rhinoplasty. 

BLEEDING - It is possible, though unusual, that you may have problems with
bleeding, during or after surgery. Should post-operative bleeding occur, it may
require emergency treatment to stop the bleeding, or a blood transfusion. Do not
take any aspirin or anti-inflammatory medications for ten days before surgery,
as this contributes to a greater risk of bleeding. Hypertension, (high
blood-pressure), that is not under good medical control may cause bleeding
during or after surgery. Accumulations of blood under the skin may delay healing
and cause scarring. 

INFECTION - Infection is quite unusual after surgery. Should an infection occur,
additional treatment, including antibiotics, may be necessary. 

SCARRING - Although good wound-healing after a surgical procedure is expected,
abnormal scars may occur, both within the skin and the deeper tissues. Scars may
be unattractive and of different color than the surrounding skin. There is the
possibility of visible marks from sutures. Additional treatments, including
surgery, may be needed to treat scarring.

DAMAGE TO DEEPER STRUCTURES - Deeper structures, such as nerves, tear ducts,
blood vessels, and muscles, may be damaged during the course of surgery. The
potential for this to occur varies with the type of rhinoplasty procedure
performed. Injury to deeper structures may be temporary or permanent. 

UNSATISFACTORY RESULT - There is the possibility of an unsatisfactory result
from the rhinoplasty surgery. The surgery may result in unacceptable visible or
tactile deformities, loss of function, or structural malposition after
rhinoplasty surgery. You may be disappointed that the results of rhinoplasty
surgery do not meet your expectations. Additional surgery may be necessary,
should the result of rhinoplasty be unsatisfactory. 

NUMBNESS - There is the potential for permanent numbness within the nasal skin,
after rhinoplasty. The occurrence of this is not predictable. Diminished, or
complete loss, of skin sensation in the nasal area may not totally resolve after
rhinoplasty. 

ASYMMETRY - The human face is normally asymmetrical. There can be a variation
from one side to the other, in the results obtained from a rhinoplasty
procedure. 

CHRONIC PAIN - Chronic pain may occur, very infrequently, after rhinoplasty. 

SKIN DISORDERS & SKIN CANCER - Rhinoplasty is a surgical procedure to reshape
the internal and/or the external structure of the nose. Skin disorders and skin
cancer may occur independently of a rhinoplasty. 

ALLERGIC REACTIONS - In rare cases, local allergies to tape, suture materials,
or topical preparations, have been reported. Systemic, (bloodstream), reactions
which are more serious may occur to drugs used during surgery and to
prescription medicines. Allergic reactions may require additional treatment. 

+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+
X0X0X0X0X0X0X0X0X0X0X0X0X0X0X0X0X0X0X0X0X0X0X0X0X0X0X0X0X0X0X0X0X
!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!
DELAYED HEALING - Wound disruption or delayed wound-healing is possible. 
Some areas of the face may not heal normally, 
and MAY TAKE A LONG TIME TO HEAL. 
[Editor's Note: This "LONG TIME" is a DECEPTIVE, GROSS UNDERSTATEMENT.]
Areas of skin may die. This may require frequent dressing changes or further
surgery, 
to remove the non-healed tissue. 
!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!
X0X0X0X0X0X0X0X0X0X0X0X0X0X0X0X0X0X0X0X0X0X0X0X0X0X0X0X0X0X0X0X0X
+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+!+

LONG-TERM EFFECTS - Subsequent alterations in nasal appearance may occur as the
result of aging, sun exposure, or other circumstances not related to rhinoplasty
surgery. Future surgery or other treatments may be necessary, to maintain the
results of a rhinoplasty operation. 

NASAL-SEPTAL PERFORATION - There is a possibility that surgery will cause a hole
in the nasal septum to develop. The occurrence of this is rare. However, if it
occurs, additional surgical treatment may be necessary, to repair the hole in
the nasal septum. In some cases, it may be impossible to correct this
complication. 

NASAL-AIRWAY ALTERATIONS - Changes may occur, after a rhinoplasty or septoplasty
operation, that may interfere with normal passage of air through the nose. 

SURGICAL ANESTHESIA - Both local and general anesthesia involve risk. There is
the possibility of complications, injury, and even death, from all forms of
anesthesia or sedation used for surgical procedures. 

HEALTH INSURANCE:
Most health-insurance companies exclude coverage for cosmetic
surgical-operations or any complications that might occur from cosmetic surgery.
If the procedure corrects a breathing problem or marked deformity, after a nasal
fracture, a portion may be covered. Please carefully review your
health-insurance, subscriber-information pamphlet. 

ADDITIONAL SURGERY NECESSARY:
There are many variable conditions, in addition to risk and potential, surgical
complications, that may influence the long-term result from rhinoplasty surgery,
even though risks and complications occur infrequently. The risks cited are
particularly associated with rhinoplasty surgery. Other complications and risks
can occur, but are even more uncommon. Should complications occur, additional
surgery or other treatments may be necessary. The practice of medicine and
surgery is not an exact science. Although good results are expected, there is no
guarantee or warranty, expressed or implied, as to the results that may be
obtained. Infrequently, it is necessary to perform additional surgery, to
improve your results. 

FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITIES:
The cost of surgery involves several charges for the services provided. The
total includes fees charged by the doctor, the cost of surgical supplies,
anesthesia, laboratory tests, and possible outpatient hospital-charges,
depending on where the surgery is performed. Depending on whether the cost of
surgery is covered by an insurance plan, you will be responsible for necessary
co-payments, deductibles, and charges not covered. Additional costs may occur,
should complications develop from the surgery. Secondary surgery, or hospital
day-surgery charges involved with revisionary surgery, would also be your
responsibility. 

DISCLAIMER:
Informed-consent documents are used to communicate information about the
proposed surgical treatment of a disease or condition, along with disclosure of
risks and alternative forms of treatment. The informed-consent process attempts
to define principles of risk disclosure that should generally meet the needs of
most patients, in most circumstances. 

However, informed-consent documents should not be considered all-inclusive, in
defining other methods of care and risks encountered. Your plastic surgeon may
provide you with additional or different information, which is based on all the
facts in your particular case, and on the state of medical knowledge. 

Informed-consent documents are not intended to define or serve as the standard
of medical care. Standards of medical care are determined on the basis of all of
the facts involved, in an individual case, and are subject to change, as
scientific knowledge and technology advance, and as practice patterns evolve.  


Note: It is important that you read the above information carefully and have all
of your questions answered, before signing the following consent statement. 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


CONSENT FOR SURGERY, PROCEDURE, OR TREATMENT

1) I hereby authorize Dr. xxxxxxx, and such assistants as may be selected, to
perform the following procedure or treatment: RHINOPLASTY SURGERY
		 I have received the following information sheet: INFORMED CONSENT FOR
RHINOPLASTY SURGERY

2) I recognize that during the course of the operation and medical treatment or
anesthesia, unforeseen conditions may necessitate different procedures than
those above. I therefore authorize the above named physician and assistants or
designees to perform such other procedures that are in the exercise of his or
her professional judgment necessary and desirable. The authority granted under
this paragraph shall include all conditions that require treatment and are not
known to my physician at the time the procedure is begun. 

3) I consent to the administration of such anesthetics considered necessary or
advisable. I understand that all forms of anesthesia involve risk and the
possibility of complications, injury, and sometimes death. 

4) I acknowledge that no guarantee has been given by anyone, as to the results
that may be obtained. 

5) I consent to the photographing or televising of the operation(s) or
procedure(s) to be performed, including appropriate portions of my body, for
medical, marketing, scientific, or educational purposes. 

6) For purposes of advancing medical education, I consent to the admittance of
observers to the the operating room. 

7) I consent to the disposal of any tissue, medical devices, or body parts,
which may be removed. 

8) I authorize the release of my Social-Security number, to appropriate
agencies, for legal reporting and medical-device registration, if applicable. 

9) IT HAS BEEN EXPLAINED TO ME IN A WAY THAT I UNDERSTAND:
a) THE ABOVE TREATMENT OR PROCEDURE TO BE UNDERTAKEN
b) THERE MAY BE ALTERNATIVE PROCEDURES OR METHODS OF TREATMENT
c) THERE ARE RISKS TO THE PROCEDURE OR TREATMENT PROPOSED


I CONSENT TO THE TREATMENT OR PROCEDURE AND THE ABOVE LISTED ITEMS, (1 THRU 9).
I AM SATISFIED WITH THE EXPLANATION. 


Signature of Patient or Person Authorized to Sign for Patient__________

Date_______________

Signature of Witness________________





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

For Everyone,
In the past, I have many times asked that EVERYONE copy the posts on this
[rosacea-cure] board, so that you will all have a copy of this material, in case
anything untoward happens to this group-board.  
I've always been concerned that this group-board might be successfully attacked,
or deleted, since this is such a block-buster cure, which is substantially
changing much of the medical field, worldwide.  
Because of possible sabotage or other problems, I've never opened up many
possible areas of this group, (e.g. polls, photos, etc.).  

Today I opened up the "Files" section, so that everyone can download two
documents.  One contains ALL [rosacea-cure] posts, (2,092 KB).
If you only want the most important posts, as they are listed on the Home Page,
that's also there, as "the Most Important" posts, (just 468 KB)
PLEASE, EVERYONE, PLEASE, CLICK ON "Files", AND DOWNLOAD THESE DOCUMENTS FOR
YOUR PERMANENT ARCHIVES.  
Thanks for your help in any promotion of this (DMSO + fluconazole) cure we may
effect as we proceed.  
God Bless, ITN & IDFN,
Dave Fleming


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

For Everyone,
Here is a recent email exchange with Brady Barrow$.  For the good of those who
read this [rosacea-cure] board, I've summarized some of the most crucial aspects
of this (DMSO + fluconazole) cure, not really just for Brady, but for the sake
of all mankind.  I also recently had a lengthy discussion with a prominent,
influential MD, concerning the below aspects of this cure, (and you certainly
made my day, Dr. C!).  As my high-school Principle once opined, "The wheels of
justice sometimes grind slowly, but they grind exceedingly fine".  If you have
studied this [rosacea-cure] board, there are no surprises for you in this post. 
But I hope you enjoy it, anyway.  
God Bless, ITN & IDFN,
Dave Fleming --- email follows, in reverse chronological order
----------------------------------------------

Dave Fleming wrote:

And An Alaskan Aloha to you, my dear, rascally Brady,

Because I've been busy, I've failed to take care of some of my rosacea-cure
board email.  
Today I was trying to catch up on it, and ran across your Sept. 26, 2008 email
to me.  
As usual, Brady, you try to be so subtle in your deception about this cure.  But
to me, (with Experiential Proof of this CURE), your deception, (and Pa$cal's),
is blatant.  

As you know so well, since you stated in your "diary" that it cured all your
pustules and papules, (which is at least 80% or 99% of rosacea, Brady), DMSO is
essential to this (DMSO + fluconazole) cure, because of its ability to
facilitate the transport and penetration of the fluconazole.
The URL you referred me to, at:
http://rosaceaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa-support.org/community/viewtopic.php?t=883
(Sorry, but I've changed this URL, because I don't want to encourage anyone to
read this conspiratorial, scheming trash.  To see it, just remove the extra "a"
letters.)
IT DOES NOT EVEN MENTION DMSO, and involves a mishmash of multiple drugs,
(including fluconazole), TAKEN ORALLY, while (DMSO + fluconazole) is
spectacularly effective, even when used only in small amounts and APPLIED ONLY
TOPICALLY.  

So the URL you referred us to not only does not substantiate my "theory", (read
as PROVEN CURE), but rather it substantiates the ongoing deception of folks like
Barrow$ and Pa$cal, concerning this (DMSO + fluconazole) cure.  (Na$e seems to
have put a sock in it, and rightfully so.)

Brady, as you no doubt know by now, this (DMSO + fluconazole) cure is being
substantiated all over the world.  Are you trying to hide this fact, in the
disinformation in this URL you've recommended???  Shame on you!  There's
obviously hell in store for those who suppress the news of this cure, so that
they can continue to make money by "treating/suppressing" the symptoms of the
suffering billions of souls involved here, (i.e. billions, because so many
different hitherto incurable diseases are curable with [DMSO + fluconazole]).  

OCCAM'S RAZOR APPLIED TO PERTINENT MECHANISMS OF THIS CURE:  
No one younger than sixteen has ever been diagnosed with rosacea.  This is one
of many facts that leads us to believe that a stealthy, either parasitic, or
partially-parasitic "entity" is causing this disease, and grows stealthily for
one or two decades, before any "symptoms" appear.  I've put "symptoms" in quotes
here, because the "symptoms" of rosacea are actually secondary,
indirectly-caused symptoms.  We find that fungal "entities" grow by sprouting
branching, spike-like "hyphae", [hi-fee] spines.  My guesstimate, is that the
spines would be about sewing-needle-size, if the size of each human cell were
about that of a basketball.  So after a decade or two, this "spiny growth"
finally begins to penetrate and actually physically destroy the human cells at
the "starting-point-root areas" of this very slow-growing disease "entity".  And
when our immune system naturally begins to attack and "deconstruct" those
physically damaged human cells, the
  so-called "symptoms" of rosacea are caused.  But if we "treat/suppress" this
immune-system action, we are not only failing to allow this needed, healthy,
immune-system action to take place, but we are ignoring and failing to even
affect the underlying ROOT CAUSE of rosacea, namely, the "hyphae-growing
entity".  
This scenario explains all the mysterious aspects of rosacea, including how the
"symptoms" may come and go, (actually dependent on the vagaries of our
immune-system's strength), and why suppressing the inflammation may temporarily
suppress the "symptoms", but never cure the disease.  The disease is actually,
(viewed long-term), progressive, plain and simple.  And there is a parallel in
the mold on an apple.  If you've ever seen such mold, you may have noticed that
it grows as a circular, expanding patch.  But if you cut away all the
visually-apparent infestation, and then taste what appears to be unaffected
apple, your taste buds tell you you've made a terrible mistake.  Normally, by
the time you see the "starting-point-root" damage, the entire, normal-looking
apple has been invaded by these invisible "hyphae".  So when we apply (DMSO +
fluconazole) to any "patch" of apparent rosacea infestation, we normally find
that the actual boundaries of the infestation extend
  far beyond that "starting-point-root" patch, although the areas farther from
that patch are less "reactive" to the med, because the infestation has had fewer
years to grow/attack there.  

OCCAM'S RAZOR APPLIED TO IDIOPATHIC-DISEASE MECHANISMS OF MYCOTOXINS:  
To top it off, we find that these disease "entities" are site-specific, (with
the partial-exception of candida), because they grow like a mushroom grows,
rather than multiplying as bacteria do, which can then travel around the body in
the bloodstream.  One good aspect of this, is that these "entities" took a
million years to evolve their complex form, so they cannot become "resistant" to
(DMSO + fluconazole), the way bacteria can mutate overnight to become resistant
strains.  SO THIS CURE IS HERE TO STAY.  But we do find that these "entities"
constantly secrete complex "mycotoxins" which do indeed travel throughout our
body.  These mycotoxins have two Darwinian motives:  
(1) To kill bacteria, since the "entities" compete with bacteria for "food"
(2)  To pre-digest their "food", (before they "eat" it).  We first eat our food
and then we digest it, but these "entities" first pre-digest their "food", (i.e.
in this case, the food is the human body!), then they "eat"/absorb it.  
This means that these stealthy, parasitic "entities" are putting mycotoxins into
our bloodstream, every second of every day, for decades, before we even have any
DISCERNIBLE symptoms that even allow us to know we're infested with this stuff. 
BUT (DMSO + fluconazole) DOES DETECT/EXPOSE AND CURE THEM, AT ANY STAGE OF THEIR
DEVELOPMENT! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
And what does this chronic mycotoxin presence do to us?  Only God knows, but we
can be certain that it's up to no good, given the fact that it's most likely
meant to "pre-digest" our body!!!  So we are presented with the strong,
quite-credible suspicion that such chronic mycotoxins may cause diseases that
have no known cause, (i.e. idiopathic diseases).  And the white-coat deceivers
try to hide the fact, that the list of idiopathic diseases is almost endless! 
In fact, when doctors "treat" us, they most often have no clue as to what they
are actually doing, since they are just "treating" symptoms!!!  So when or if
symptoms are secondary, or even multiple-cascade effects, so-called "modern
medicine" is most often in the dark, as to actually knowing the ROOT CAUSE of
any given "set of symptoms".  

And this (DMSO + fluconazole) cure does not reverse the underlying damage that
may become evident, when this disease is cured.  Whatever damage is done by this
"entity's" stealthy, parasitic growth cannot be reversed by this cure.  And
since delaying the use of this (DMSO + fluconazole) cure guarantees that the
disease "entities" will grow larger and do more irreversible damage, those
suffering billions of people will surely one day curse the names of Barrow$,
Pa$cal, and Na$e.  So there must be a very special, intense hell in store for
anyone who would actually use this cure, enjoy at least a partial cure of their
own rosacea, and then proceed to suppress, obscure, and deny the ACCURATE news
of this cure.  Wow, words fail me, Brady.  

And the $64-Trillion-dollar question is, "Exactly what percent of all rosacea is
caused by these disease "entities" that are now curable with (DMSO +
fluconzole), Brady"???  I believe the answer is obviously 100%!!!  But for some
reason, (which is obvious to all concerned), Barrow$ wants to obscure this
reality, by claiming there are other "causes" of rosacea.  So Barrow$ is
claiming to know more than the devious white-coat doctors claim, when they,
(only when pressed), admit they have no clue as to the cause of rosacea.  He's
motivated to claim there are a gazillion causes of rosacea, (at last count, he
was claiming 57), BECAUSE THAT'S THE ONLY WAY HE'S EVER GOING TO GET GRANT MONEY
FOR HIS ROSACEA-PROFITEER, BIASED, MOST-LIKELY-DECEPTIVE "RESEARCH".  

THE ASTOUNDING REALITY, IS THAT (DMSO + fluconazole) HAS A VIRTUALLY ZERO EFFECT
ON HEALTHY TISSUE, SO NO DIAGNOSIS IS NEEDED.  JUST APPLY (DMSO + fluconazole),
TO FIND OUT IF YOU NEED THIS CURE.  IF YOU DO NEED IT, THEN THE "ENTITIES"
CAUSING YOUR ROSACEA WILL LOSE THEIR DECADES-LONG PARASITIC-PROTECTION FROM YOUR
IMMUNE SYSTEM, (since it is established that an active vector of fluconazole is
that it strips and/or inhibits the ergosterol in the cell walls of the disease
"entity").  THEN, EVIDENCE OF YOUR IMMUNE SYSTEM'S ATTACK ON SUCH "STRIPPED
ENTITIES" , (SUCH AS INFLAMMATION AND PEELING SKIN), WILL APPEAR.   Generally,
wherever there are the most sensitive, tactile nerve-endings, a few minutes of
stinging will occur, NOT BECAUSE DAMAGE IS OCCURRING, BUT BECAUSE THE DISEASE
"ENTITIES" HAVE INTEGRATED THEMSELVES WITH THE NERVE ENDINGS, SO THE MED'S
ATTACK ON THE "ENTITIES" CAUSES THE NERVE ENDINGS TO "FIRE", CAUSING THE "FAUX"
STINGING SENSATION
  TO OCCUR.  (It really is "faux", but it does hurt.) It's possible that adding
1% or 2% Lidocaine to this (DMSO + fluconazole) med would lessen or even
eliminate the stinging.

BUT THERE IS NO OTHER CURE.  AND ANY "TREAT/SUPPRESS-THE-SYMPTOMS" DELAY WILL
CAUSE THE LONG-TERM, IRREVERSIBLE DAMAGE TO INCREASE EXPONENTIALLY.  SO THIS
CURE IS ABSOLUTELY BETTER SOONER, THAN LATER.  

Admittedly, this is not a convenient cure, especially when we are curing facial
skin.  We socially-attuned humans may be understandably devastated by the
temporary inflammation and peeling skin this cure entails.  There may even be
some permanent damage that was done by these disease "entities", which may, (or
may not), become apparent after this cure is accomplished.  For example, I still
have two small purple veins on the left side of my nose, where I cured my
developing rhinophyma.  Some "stable, non-diseased pinkness" may be left.  I
have even observed small, almost invisible wrinkles on the back of my left hand,
where I cured a substantial infestation.  BUT SUCH HEALTHY-SKIN IMPERFECTIONS
CAN CERTAINLY BE SUCCESSFULLY MINIMIZED BY MODERN DERMATOLOGIC MEANS, (SINCE,
[i.e. IF AND ONLY IF], THE SKIN IS NO LONGER DISEASED).  

So, dear Brady, your attacks, both subtle and strident, (long ago, in May 2003),
once forced me to do the work of assembling a "Directions List", as at
[rosacea-cure] message #210, as at:
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/210
In this email response, I've been encouraged to state the plain facts in a short
form, so as to make it possible to reach even more people with this cure.  As
the Bible puts it, "You meant it for harm, but God turned it into good".  You
might also look up Mark 14:21, if you want to know what I think of your
continued attempts at disinformation, concerning this (DMSO + fluconazole) cure.
 
God Bless, ITN & IDFN,
Dave Fleming
================================================

>>Aloha from Brady
>>Friday, September 26, 2008 1:59 AM
>>From:  "Brady Barrows" <brady@...>
>>From:  brady at bradybarrows.com
>>To: rosacea-cure-owner@yahoogroups.com

>>Brady Barrows wrote:
>>Aloha Dave,
>>Just thought you would be interested in this post:
>>
>>http://rosaceaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa-support.org/community/viewtopic.php?t=883
>>
>>This is the first post that has ever substantiated what you have
>>been saying all along.
>>
>>Anyway, Congratulations that someone has substantiated your theory.
>>
>>[BRADY'S ADVERTISING HERE HAS BEEN DELETED]
>>
>>I think that rosacea is a catch all diagnosis that physicians use
to call any skin condition that causes facial redness.
The number of skin diseases that look like rosace is
staggering and apparently one of them is a Fungus Rosacea.
>>
>>Brady

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

For Everyone,
So do you think this post is "off-topic"?  Well, it might be, but as you may
understand, (because of the possibility of foot-fungus "mycotoxins" in your
blood affecting your rosacea), curing your stealthy, non-symptomatic
foot-fungus, (including nail-fungus), is "on-topic" here, in my considered
opinion.
On 15FEB08, I "invented" an interesting method of curing foot-fungus with (DMSO
+ fluconazole).  As you may be aware, I have always lamented the fact that this
med is water-thin, and therefore runs off and requires multiple
topical-applications, to maximize its absorption.

So, I "bagged" my left foot in a plastic bag, and I added ~40 ml of
[(90% DMSO/10% water) + 2% Fluconazole + 2% Ibuprofen], and I kept the bag on
for an entire evening, (about seven hours), wearing flip-flops.  It was very
easy to do, and it created profound curative effects which have lasted even six
months.
I was surprised to find that about 5 to 7 ml of "liquid" were never absorbed by
my foot.  This has led me to believe that a large percentage of the 10% water in
this med actually evaporates, when it's applied topically in the open air.

The bag was of very thin, translucent plastic.  It was the type of bag used by
hotels, to line their small trash containers.  Off the roll, it measured 6
inches by 33 inches.  Since there were creases there, I tied a knot in the
closed end of the bag, so I could position the knot in such a way as to easily
wear flip-flops with the bag over my leg.  I used a large rubber band, to hold
up the bag at my knee.  Also, I used a 1-inch paint brush, to paint my entire
calf, from foot to knee, with the same med.  I "painted" it two or three times,
during that seven hours, and it was very convenient, since any unabsorbed med
would "run down" into the bag, allowing me to do whatever activities around the
house I needed to do.

Of course, the med caused no tactile sensation at all, and the only obvious
effect was a change in the appearance of the foot-skin, and peeling of the
foot-skin that was prominent for about two months.  Some peeling continued
longer, from one spot, (below my left ankle, along the edge of the foot), that
was obviously infested more deeply, and I kept peeling off the dead skin every
week or so, and applying miniscule amounts of the same med to that spot, during
the next four months.

ONE CAUTION:
Do NOT actively "pick at" and "aggressively peel" the dead skin.  Doing this,
the "grain" of the skin sometimes caused my skin to peel down to a spot where it
would actually bleed.  I was stupid to do this.  I don't understand why I'm so
aggressive in this "peeling of the dead skin".  So please, "Do as I say, not as
I did".

ONE TIP:
I am motivated to save money, in my very conservative use of this med, and I'm
also taking my time, to gain "experimental knowledge" of this cure.
You can use much more med "in the bag", if you wish, and treat your feet for
just a couple of hours every day, even for several weeks.  And the concentration
of med you use can be much higher, and not exactly what I used at all.  For
example, you could use:
[(90% DMSO/10% water) + 10% Fluconazole + 2% Ibuprofen]
or
[(90% DMSO/10% water) + 5% Fluconazole]
or
[(90% DMSO/10% water) + 7% Fluconazole + 1% Ibuprofen]
or whatever!!!

The curative effects during the first month or so were especially satisfying.  I
long ago cured a very bad case of nail fungus, in my big toes.  Now, I noticed a
pink quarter-moon inflammation about a quarter-inch from the root of the big
toenail, implying a more complete cure of the "root" of this nail-fungus.
Some barely perceptible soreness and pinkness developed, in an area about four
inches by two inches, centered on the middle arch of the foot.  BTW, as an
experiment, I treated only my left foot, to observe any differences between the
feet, in the future.  I did notice that there has actually been some minor
peeling from the heel area on my right foot! This was evidently caused by some
of the med which was absorbed into my bloodstream and caused some curative
effects in my right foot.
[Editor's Note:  But this curative action in my right foot is a little confused,
because I also treated my nasal passageway at about the same time, INGESTING
that med.  I plan to post here about this ongoing curing of the nasal passageway
and sinuses, in the future.]

I hope this doesn't sound ridiculous to anyone, but I've been visualizing using
this "bagging-soak" method on other parts of my body.  Using this "soak method"
on the hands and arms is an obvious idea.  but I actually tried out putting one
of these bags on my head!  I tried out a #84 rubber band, (measuring 3.5 inches
by 0.5 inches), putting it over the bag, running it across my eyebrows, under
the ears, and around the back of the neck.  It was very tight, (which it has to
be, to hold in the med), so it would definitely leave a depression-mark in the
skin, if left on for even one hour.  But that seems like a very good time-period
for this med-application to be accomplished, on the entire scalp, ears, and
forehead.

Of course, the other area of interest is the perineum-vicinity, (i.e. the groin
area).  The only way I've imagined accomplishing that "soak", is to look in some
medical-supply store, to see if they have any "plastic pants", which could be
sealed by rubber bands on both legs.  Believe it or not, I'm serious about this,
folks.  :-)

I hope this helps.
God Bless, ITN & IDFN,
Dave Fleming





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

For Everyone,
My apologies to everyone, that I've not had the time to keep this [rosacea-cure]
board as active as it should be.  But it seems to me that the basic,
crystal-clear facts are all posted here, so... WAITING IS.  

The below email sent to me a while ago hits the nail on the head.  
Whatever "conspiracies" or "reasons" are suppressing this (DMSO + fluconazole)
cure, are indeed like a $limy, di$gusting, evil-$pirited-busine$$ "fungus among
us".  
It's obviously not possible, for one little guy like me to effectively defeat
the folk$ placing ads for "tuf actin' Tenakten", or "Lotremen-Ultra --- the
killer-cure", which definitely do NOT cure foot-fungus, whereas (DMSO +
fluconazole) does cure it and scads of other hitherto "incurable" diseases.  And
one person can't even begin to defeat the complex suppression and B$ that are
extending profit$ by "treating/controlling" only the symptoms of rosacea,
allowing the ROOT-CAUSE of this disease to progress nonstop, doing
ever-expanding irreparable-damage.  
And so-called "doctors", supposedly dedicated to curing people, continue to
refuse to prescribe this relatively-inexpensive, benign, effective, (DMSO +
fluconazole) cure.  They should be made to pay for their criminal behavior in
this matter, and sooner or later, they surely will.  But evidently, not any time
soon.  I hope every person suffering with rosacea and all the other diseases
curable with (DMSO + fluconazole) will bring a CLASS-ACTION LAWSUIT in the
future, and take away every penny of profit these God-forsaken bast#*@$ are
making.  
Take names, record and document these doctors' crime, and
kick...their...collective...a$$!!!
What a sad commentary this is, on "Truth, Justice, and The American Way".  Where
is "Superman", when we really need him?
God Bless, ITN & IDFN,
Dave Fleming --- emails follow, in reverse chronological order ---


Dave Fleming wrote:

Hi, Delilah,
Thank you for your discerning, incisive email.  
DON'T FORGET THE ABSOLUTE NECESSITY OF THE DMSO, IN THIS CURE.  

Yes, some sort of "fungal-entities" appear to be the ROOT-CAUSE culprits, but it
appears that the (DMSO + fluconazole) may only "strip" these "entities" of their
cell-walls, leaving a lot of "work" to be done by our immune system, to "finish
off" these "entities".  This "cure-process" normally requires repeat
applications of this med, and takes many days, or even weeks and months, to
complete.  And anything we can do to maximize our immune system is good, to
shorten the time this cure takes, to be completed.  

Of course, I cannot prove the above statement, concerning "vectors &
mechanisms", but "Occam's-razor" logic leads me to believe this is the way these
cures are being effected, given all the curative processes I've witnessed in and
on my own body during the last seven years, using only (DMSO + fluconazole).  

So the final result of this (DMSO + fluconazole) cure is certain, but any
hypotheses we offer about the mechanism(s) of this cure are, of course, not
required to be correct, for this cure to be valid and effective.  
Other examples have occurred before, of this sort of situation.  For example,
when penicillin was first used, no one knew exactly how those cures were being
caused, and even a common thing like aspirin, even to this day, is used
effectively without absolute knowledge of ALL the mechanisms of its actions.   

Also, although some of these "fungal-entities" may be "on" our face, (especially
when we continually shave every day, causing microscopic cuts that give them an
initial "foothold"), I believe that the nasal sinuses are the "hiding places"
for the cause of rosacea.  And lo and behold, we find that the so-called
"butterfly-pattern", (i.e. the forehead, nose, and small areas of cheek directly
below the eyes), on the face that's common with rosacea, is the exact same
pattern formed by the sinuses in and adjacent to the nasal passageway!!!  

Fluconazole is evidently substantially more benign and effective, (with less
side-effects possible), than any of the other "azoles".  From what I can find
out, ketoconazole can have some unwanted hormonally-caused side-effects, (such
as enlarging breasts on men), but this side-effect may not exist at all, if
ketoconazole is used only topically with DMSO.  
In any case, I've chosen to stick with what I've experienced myself, rather than
trying to develop all the possible extrapolations and permutations of this (DMSO
+ fluconazole) cure.  

YOU ASK:
>>I am also wondering how much involvment this fungus has in our health,
>>I mean if it can grow on our faces in plain sight...then it can grow
>>anywhere in the body.
>>Do you think that the fungus in a person with rosacea resides
>>thoughout their whole body like in the "leaky gut/candida overgrowth
>>theory" or do you think it is just targeting the face?


Again, my disclaimer here, is that my "guesses" in these questions do not have
to be correct, for this cure be valid.  But my answers to your questions here
involve the fact that "fungal-entities" are known to produce "mycotoxins", which
are known to be incredibly diversified and potent.  (Penicillin is one of these
"mycotoxins", as well as at least one whose name I forget, which is one of the
deadliest poisons known to exist.)  Speaking in terms of the
hundreds-of-millions of years they've had to evolve, one main purpose of
mycotoxins is to fight off bacteria, in competition for "food"; and another
purpose of mycotoxins is to "digest" food.  That is, we first "eat" our food,
and then we "digest" it, but "fungal-entities" first digest their food with
mycotoxins, and THEN they "eat/absorb" it.  
There is perhaps only ONE fungus, (i.e. a certain kind of yeast called
"candida"), which at times can propagate by single cells dividing, thus
multiplying like bacteria do.  So, of the countless "fungal entities" that
exist, only candida is known to cause the so-called "leaky-gut" syndrome,
because it can "travel" in the body as bacteria do, in the bloodstream.  
But in my experience, ALL the other "fungal-entities" propagate by growing
little "spines", or "hyphy", [hi-fee].  Therefore, they grow only as a
site-specific "mass". Since they are at least partially, (and possibly
completely), parasitic, such a "mass" can grow for decades, especially in areas
of our bodies which have little or no blood supply, and therefore are acted on
minimally by our immune system.  Also, any ORAL drug we take will have NO EFFECT
on any "fungal-entity" which is "hiding" in places with minimal or zero blood
supply.  As soon as we stop taking the ORAL drug, such "hiding masses" can grow
right back into the flesh with blood supply.  
[Editor's Note: Where is our blood supply minimal?  Well, we have a lot of dead
cells, "in/on" our body, and thats in all of our skin, fingernails, toenails,
and especially in thick skin such as that on our feet.  Another place is inside
sinus cavities.  Also, our bones, cartilage, ligaments, etc, have very little
blood supply, compared to our flesh.]  

SO THE CRUCIAL IMPORTANCE AND ABSOLUTE NECESSITY OF THE DMSO AS A
"PENETRATION-TRANSPORT VEHICLE" BECOMES CLEAR, IN MAKING THIS CURE "WORK".  

When such "fungal entities" have grown even into our BONES, (such as in our
toes, and in our forehead-skull bone, where eight or more nasal cavities exist,
across our brows), then we may need to INGEST this (DMSO + fluconazole) med,
with a fluconazole-content equal to accepted and normal dosages prescribed
ORALLY, (from 6 to 12 mg/Kg of body weight), IN COMBINATION WITH
topically-applied (DMSO + fluconazole).  

We can surmise that these "masses" probably grow stealthily for even two
decades, (symptom-free), since no one under the age of 16 has ever been
diagnosed with rosacea.  As such a "mass" grows, it finally "invades" and
"lacerates" our own human cells so badly, that our own immune system begins to
"attack" our own damaged cells, to get rid of them.  This "secondary" action of
our immune system is what causes the "symptoms of rosacea", and if we suppress
this "inflammation" so as to "treat/control" the rosacea SYMPTOMS, we allow the
ROOT-CAUSE "mass" to continue to expand.  

BUT GETTING BACK TO YOUR QUESTION, YOU STATE:
>>Do you think that the fungus in a person with rosacea resides
>>thoughout their whole body like in the "leaky gut/candida overgrowth
>>theory" or do you think it is just targeting the face?


No, I believe it grows as "masses" that are "site-specific", (except for
"candida"). HOWEVER, the "mycotoxins" we can assume these "masses" produce will
indeed go throughout our body.  And what will such "mycotoxins" do to us,
especially over a time-period of DECADES??? Who knows?  But we can be very sure
that such "mycotoxins" will do harm, because their purpose is likely to be TO
DIGEST OUR WHOLE BODY, so that the "fungal-entity-mass" CAN EAT US.  Given the
chronic presence of such "mycotoxins", (such as might be produced by uncured,
but symptom-suppressed foot-fungus), not even God may know what it is doing to
us, (even including our FACE, where some other "fungal entities" are growing in
our nasal passageways and sinuses, and putting out their own most likely
DIFFERENT KINDS of "mycotoxins").  

This leads us to STRONGLY suspect that a MYRIAD of idiopathic diseases, (i.e.
diseases with unknown causes), are CAUSED by these chronic "mycotoxins".  And
that is an incredibly profound suspicion, since anything from certain types of
cancer to chronic-fatigue-syndrome to alzheimer's disease, and even obesity and
premature aging may be caused by these "mycotoxins", caused by stealthy,
parasitic, "fungal-entity" diseases that have been incurable, until the advent
of (DMSO + fluconazole).  
Wow!  Wow!  Wow!  Wow!  Wow!  Wow!  Wow!  Wow!  Wow!  Wow!  Wow!  Wow!  Wow! 
Wow!  Wow!  Wow!  Wow!  Wow!  Wow!  Wow!  Wow!  Wow!  Wow!  Wow!  Wow!  Wow! 
Wow!  Wow!  Wow!  Wow!  Wow!  Wow!  Wow!  Wow!  Wow!  Wow!  Wow!  Wow!  Wow! 
Wow!  Wow!  Wow!  Wow!  Wow!  Wow!  Wow!  Wow!  Wow!  Wow!  Wow!  Wow!  Wow! 
Wow!  Wow!  Wow!  Wow!  Wow!  Wow!  Wow!  Wow!  Wow!  Wow!  Wow!  Wow!  Wow! 
Wow!  Wow!  Wow!  Wow!  Wow!  Wow!  Wow!  Wow!  Wow!  Wow!  Wow!  Wow!  Wow!  

Thank you Delilah, for your kind blessing, and may God richly bless you.  
I hope this helps,
God Bless, ITN & IDFN,
Dave Fleming

========================================================
========================================================

Date: 2008
From: [ID deleted]
To: "Dave Fleming" <fulltruth40@...>
Subject: The Fungus Amoung Us

Delilah wrote:

Hi Dave,
I hope you are still answering emails, I have been sorting through
this website, and trying to understand the nature of Rosacea.

So, Rosacea is probably a fungus, right because Difulcan which is an
antifungal kills it...and if it walks like a duck...and quacks...

I have tried asking doctors for it and they wont give me the Diflucan,
I went to 2 derms and a regualr doctor. They were more than happy to
prescribe metrogel or azelic acid or reccommend lazers, but they are
not gonna give me the flucozanole...why is this??? One derm said it
would damage my liver...but its only topical how is that possible???

I told one doctor that I thot it was fungus on my face and he laughed
and said that it was unknown, uncurable but could be controlled.

why is everything so complicated? This is not an adictive substance
that must be controlled its an antifungal!!!

anyway, I was researching and found out that some people have used
Nizoral shampoo which is Ketaconazole on the rosacea, so I thought I
would try it.

Well, I am pretty much convinced of 2 things now...

1. Rosacea is a fungus, not a bacterial disease or vascular condition
cause the ketaconazole is helping more than any antibiotic ever did.

2. There is some deep medical/pharmaceutical conspiracy here designed
to keep us in the dark and keep us shelling out.

My whole way of thinking is being realigned. I used to trust doctors
and the government and I used to think that all was being done for
people with diseases.

Now I am seeing that everything is a business. A cold hearted
business. I am thinking now that Rosacea is not the only "uncurable"
condition that has a cure which is suppressed by WHO???

What if they are suppressing the cure for Cancer and Aids.

I am also wondering how much involvment this fungus has in our health,
I mean if it can grow on our faces in plain sight...then it can grow
anywhere in the body.

Do you think that the fungus in a person with rosacea resides
thoughout their whole body like in the "leaky gut/candida overgrowth
theory" or do you think it is just targeting the face?

I have started eating garlic and cinnamon because they are natural
fungicides which wont affect my liver. I am also eating more lemons,
limes and other things that fungus dont like.

I am going to try a few more doctors and try to get some Diflucan, but
in the mean time I am keeping the Nizoral shampoo on my face for at
least 5 minutes a day. It would be better im sure if it was a cream. I
wish doctors were more open minded.

Dave, I hope you never give up trying to get this VERY IMPORTANT
information out to the public. Have you put up anything on Youtube
yet, you know alot of people with rosacea will search on youtube for
information and all there is on there is Brady Barrows and Laser
Surgery Centers.

Dave, I know that God is going to bless you in a very big way.


Take Care,

Delilah





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Subject: A 6-year REVIEW: [DMSO + fluconazole] CURE

For Everyone,

I believe that the survival of this [rosacea-cure] board, during the last five
years, is truly a MIRACLE, so I again strongly recommend that EVERYONE, (yes,
this means YOU, dear Reader), copy all messages from this [rosacea-cure] board,
(or at least copy the messages listed as crucial, in the Home-Page Description),
in case this [rosacea-cure] board disappears, at any future time.  And promote
this (DMSO + fluconazole) cure, in every way you can.

And before saying anything else, I want to express my heartfelt thanks and
gratitude, to those at Yahoo!, who have somehow resisted whatever sinister,
malevolent pressure MUST have been placed on them, since April 2003, to delete
this [rosacea-cure] board.  Historically speaking, this [DMSO + fluconazole]
cure is easily the biggest medical breakthrough since penicillin.  Therefore,
Yahoo!'s fulfillment, (in maintaining this [rosacea-cure] board), will benefit
mankind more than most people can possibly understand now, since this cure has
still not been widely acclaimed as the "blockbuster cure" that it is.

And it's important to put this situation in historical perspective, by applying
the words from an old pop song,
"Time is on my side, yes it is!,
Ti-i-i-im, is on MY si-de, YES IT IS!!!",
concerning the ultimate victory of bringing this [DMSO + fluconazole] cure to
all mankind.

And let's get one thing very straight, concerning motivation.  I claim that my
motivation in promoting this cure is absolutely pure and "God-centered", because
I'm not doing it to make money, or for any other benefit, other than the bliss I
gain by trying to help billions of fellow-suffering humans, to CURE their
hitherto-incurable diseases, (as well as PREVENTING and/or ARRESTING IDIOPATHIC
DISEASES that may be INDIRECTLY CAUSED by the chronic mycotoxins from these
hitherto-incurable diseases).  In fact, I had taken a "pledge to God", long
before I "discovered" this cure, that I would "spread all possible blessings to
my community".

But I was stubborn and closed-hearted at first, because I honestly wondered,
whether God would want this cure to be allowed to people who are doing very evil
things.  My thinking, was that only the "good" people should receive this cure,
but this meant that there would be an added delay of many, many years, (or even
many decades), before this would happen.  Also, as I examined my mind-set in
prayer, some scripture came back to me from my past experiences, that "no one is
worthy, no, not one", and, "God causes the (life-giving) rain to fall on the
good and on the evil, alike".  At that point, I became highly motivated to share
the knowledge of this cure, and I desperately went searching, for any and all
ways to promote this good news.
Then, I found the amazing Yahoo! free-groups service.  But the folks running the
"rosacea" groups there have found ways to reject this momentous cure, (sometimes
quite cunningly), for five years now.

Obviously, people like Na$e, Pa$coe, and Barrow$ are making money from their
"involvement" in helping folks to "control/treat" the symptoms of their
incurable, reoccurring, progressive rosacea.

And, (as Barrow$ loves to trumpet from the rooftops), there's absolutely nothing
wrong with making money in that way.  BUT THAT'S ONLY TRUE AS LONG AS NO CURE
EXISTS.
THE "WRONG/EVIL" ONLY REARS ITS HIDEOUS, REPTILIAN HEAD WHEN A CURE APPEARS FOR
ROSACEA, AND THEY IGNORE, MALIGN, AND/OR SUPPRESS THE NEWS OF THAT CURE.
THIS IS VERY SIMPLE TO UNDERSTAND, BUT THAT DOESN'T MEAN IT'S SIMPLE TO
OVERCOME.

So, to continue to appear to be "nice guys", Na$e, Pa$coe, and Barrow$ have to
convince you that they believe this cure doesn't work.  But that can't be done,
without deceiving you.  At most, they could claim ONLY that they simply don't
know, whether it's effective or not.

Na$e was so absurd and ham-handed, that he met his God-given comeuppance in
2006, as at:
http://www.debunkingnase.org/
nasewatch@...

Are Pa$coe and Barrow$ next?
It's my opinion, that Pa$coe and Barrow& are losing the blessings that God had
planned for them, (IF they had unselfishly promoted this [DMSO + fluconazole]
cure); and they will ultimately lose even the blessings that God had allowed
them, before this cure's advent.

Pa$coe made his intentions very clear to me in 2003, by banning me off his r-s
board, when I knew that he knew, that I had done nothing to deserve that.
But Barrow$ is far more subtle, because he has not (yet) banned me off his
[rosaceans] board.  Why?  Well, the poor guy may be a bit "conflicted".   Was it
his "scheme", to "try this cure" himself, getting all the attention he could for
his web$ite$, and then receive payment for ads on those hundreds of web$ite
pages, from companies that desperately want to suppress ANY cure that would put
them out of business?  It seemed so predictable to me, that he then solemnly
pronounced judgement, (after his "kangaroo-court trial" of this cure), that, "It
didn't cure my rosacea".  Hmmmmmmm....

He kept a public, daily diary of his topical facial-applications of [DMSO +
fluconazole], for 141 days, (and he asked for donation$, to read it), and he
said some very good things, about this cure.  Then, he made the
deceptively-simplified statement: "It didn't cure my rosacea".  But he had
already admitted in his "Diflucan Diary", that [DMSO + fluconazole/Diflucan] got
rid of all his pustules and papules!  And he did indeed show some amazement and
happiness, at that result!  I don't know what YOU might say, dear Reader, but
most people would admit that getting rid of all pustules and papules means that
his rosacea was at least PARTIALLY CURED, and I would say that meant 80% or 90%
cured.  But he refused to admit, what he had already stated in his "Diary". 
Following his fore$eeable "scheme"/motivation, he just said, "It didn't cure my
rosacea".  Uh-huh.....
And in the preceding months, I myself had stated quite plainly, that MY rosacea
and developing rhinophyma had not been 100%-cured after just 141 days of using
this cure, either.

BUT THAT'S HOW BARROW$ ENDED IT, and he sometime thereafter, quietly, silently
removed links to his "Diflucan Diary", off of his website.  Why did he do that? 
Well, his own words in his "Diary" proved that he was half-truth lying, when he
said, "It didn't cure my rosacea", because he had admitted that this med had
cured all his pustules and papules.  Perhaps because he feels guilty, (and also
because he may want to straddle this fence, so he can falsely claim later that
he promoted this cure), he STILL admits at least THIS curative effect of [DMSO +
fluconazole], in his current, watered-down, obscurely-placed statement, "It is
excellent on pustules, papules and pimples" at:
http://www.rosacea-control.com/html/diflucandirections.html
Before, he said it cured his pustules and papules, as at:
http://www.rosacea-control.com/html/diary2.html
But HE'S OBSCURED THAT "Diflucan DIARY", and he now uses the non-commital, sly,
ambiguous phrase, "it's excellent on".  Hmmmmm.

Since that time, the ante has gone up.  Only 200-million people are estimated to
have rosacea, worldwide, so Barrow$ was only hurting THEM, right?  But since
Barrow$ ended his "Diflucan Diary", I've come to the opinion that almost all of
humanity needs this (DMSO + fluconazole) cure, because there are so many
different "kinds" of "infestations" that it cures.  That means that my present
opinion, is that probably 5-BILLION people need this curative med.
The "infestations" are often invisible, with no discernible symptoms, or are
easily ignored, like "liver spots".  But these "parasitic, (most likely fungal),
infestations" are most likely secreting "mycotoxins" into our bodies for many
decades, which very likely are causing MANY DISEASES WHOSE CAUSES ARE PRESENTLY
UNKNOWN.

It's mind-boggling, to consider that such idiopathic diseases as
"chronic-fatigue syndrome", or arthritis, or lupus, or MS, or certain types of
cancer, or premature aging, or alzheimer's disease,
or (YOU GUESS ONE!!!), might actually be prevented or arrested, by getting rid
of the insidious, (usually-stealthy), sources of these "chronic mycotoxins" in
our bodies.

From my viewpoint, Barrow$, as a professed Chri$tian, desperately needs to
justify his willingness to allow billions of people to continue to suffer, while
he refu$e$ to promote the full truth about this cure.  This poor guy just
doesn't appreciate the fact that God has given him an opportunity to help
BILLIONS of his fellow human beings, by helping to spread the positive news of
this cure.  And very few people in all history have had such an amazing
opportunity.
Meanwhile, he continues to make money from disease, and he has always loved to
boast, about his right to make money from this suffering.  He goes on, and on,
and on, and on, about this, at:
http://www.rosacea-control.com/html/diflucandirections.html
http://www.rosacea-control.com/html/profit.html
http://www.rosacea-control.com/html/profit2.html
http://www.rosacea-control.com/html/profit3.html

BUT WHEN A CURE APPEARS, then all this blustering bravado, about the
righteousness of making a profit from helping folks to "control/treat" the
symptoms of their rosacea, STARTS TO SOUND VERY EVIL INDEED, ESPECIALLY FIVE
YEARS AFTER THE NEWS OF THAT CURE APPEARED ON THE INTERNET, (and on his
[rosaceans] board), IN APRIL 2003.  In addition, Barrow$ knows that I have
repeatedly stated that this cure does NOT remove whatever damage has been done
by these "infestations", so the progressive nature of these "infestations" means
that DELAYING this (DMSO + fluconazole) cure ALLOWS PROGRESSIVELY MORE AND MORE
PERMANENT DAMAGE TO OCCUR, if the symptoms are just
"controlled/treated/suppressed".
Currently, I saw a TV ad that promoted a new "drug remedy" for "skin problems",
and the drug company was so audacious, that they stated clearly that this drug
"works" by SUPPRESSING YOUR IMMUNE SYSTEM!  Ugh!  Does common sense lead anyone
to conclude that it would EVER be "a good thing" to SUPPRESS YOUR IMMUNE
SYSTEM???  This SUPPRESSION is no doubt the temporary effect that most, if not
all, of the "controls/treatments" being promoted offer you, including all
"DIETS".

Barrow$ also claims I "attacked" him, as at:
http://www.rosacea-control.com/html/diflucandirections.html
I NEVER attacked Barrow$, in any way, shape, or form, AND HE KNOWS IT.
At that same URL, Barrow$ claims I was "rude".
But I was never rude, although I did once state clearly that Na$e was lying,
when Barrow$ promoted Na$e's attempt to discredit this (DMSO + fluconazole) cure
with cunning, half-truth lies about DMSO, on Barrow$' [rosaceans] board.  Even
more than a year after Na$e was totally discredited, as at,
http://www.debunkingnase.org/
, Barrow$ steadfastly continues to provide links to Na$e's half-truth lies, to
discredit this (DMSO + fluconazole) cure.

The reason Barrow$ does not give specific examples of my "attacks" and
"rudeness", is that they never occurred.
Along with my fictitious "attacks" and "rudeness", Barrow$ claims that I was
"quickly banned at r-s and r-k".
But that's also a very deceptive statement.  In fact, it took months, for those
who ran the [rosacea-support] and [rosacea-knowledge] groups, to begin to
realize that this (DMSO + fluconazole) combo really IS a cure, for the very
diseases that are making them so much money.  As I continued to successfully
answer all questions thrown my way, they finally had to stop laughing at this
cure; and THAT'S when they BANNED me.  I never did even one, solitary thing to
bring on that banning, except that I continued to speak the truth, with a clear
voice.
Not long after that, r-k went permanently silent, as at:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-knowledge
, and r-s went seriously askew, and lost all the medical "experts", (such as
Na$e), off their board.  It's quite an inside joke, that the very person that
was quoted on the r-s board recently, (in Oct. 2007), to try to discredit this
cure, is dear Dr. Marjorie Lazoff, MD, as at:
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-support/message/97701
Dr. Lazoff was the only real MD they had on the r-s board, and Pa$coe later
BANNED HER off the r-s board!!!
Wow, the bull-manure is so deep on this subject, that you need wings, to stay
above it!
When Marjorie later began to realize that this (DMSO + fluconazole) cure might
actually work, the r-k owner allowed posts that attacked her, and she dropped
out of Internet-sight, which effectively terminated the r-k board, since they no
longer had any credible source of "knowledge" there.  I believe that, as an MD,
she could prescribe (DMSO + fluconazole) for herself, and Dr. Lazoff has
probably cured whatever rosacea she had, by now.

Na$e was long ago totally discredited, but Barrow$ continues to post links to
Na$e's despicable, half-truth lies, of "DMSO Warnings", at:
http://www.rosacea-control.com/html/diflucandirections.html
And more than a year after Na$e was discredited, Barrow$ has failed to place the
link to (www.debunkingnase.org), with his links to Na$e's despicable "DMSO
Warnings".
So, dear Reader, why do YOU think Barrow$ would use any and all means to try to
discredit this (DMSO + fluconazole) cure?  Duh!
Some of my choice, private-email response to Na$e's claptrap, is at:
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/249

If the delay of this cure's coming to all mankind were not so tragic, these
actions, (and inactions), by Na$e, Pa$coe, and Barrow$ might even be amusing,
since they might as well try to stop the tide from rising.
My present estimate, is that almost all of mankind either needs to use this cure
now, or will need to, as they grow older, (because so many different kinds of
previously-incurable disease-conditions are now curable with [DMSO +
fluconazole]).  It is so dismal and painful, that even though these fellow$,
(Na$e, Pa$coe and Barrow$), have been in a position to promote the news of this
cure since I first brought it to them, in April 2003, they choose instead to
continue to spurn this opportunity that God has given them, to help literally
BILLIONS of people.

Pa$coe recently posted the same old $ee-through, $moke-$creen attack-tripe, at:
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-support/message/97682
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-support/message/97693
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-support/message/97701
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-support/message/97711
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-support/message/97725
Pa$coe himself posted in message #97711, saying, "I think DMSO just sounds truly
awful and am happy not to experience
what it smells like when it breaks down in my lungs !".

Ri-i-i-ight, Mr. Pa$coe, and you sound so well-educated!  So, is "playing dumb"
one way of desperately trying to avoid this [DMSO + fluconazole] cure???  It
sure is.

Contrary to what Pa$coe would have you believe, he's a whole lot smarter, (and
more informed), than he sounds here.  Given all the communication about this
cure, since April 2003, I'm sure that he knows, that the rather miniscule,
TOPICALLY-APPLIED amounts of [DMSO + fluconazole] used typically with this cure,
DO NOT CAUSE that very minor, (one hour or two) of "garlic-breath" that's
sometimes associated with larger amounts of DMSO alone.

Besides, if CURING a debilitating disease requires that you have some benign,
innocuous, (though annoying), "garlic-breath" for a few hours, why would Pa$coe
think you would rather keep your disease, and keep paying money that ends up in
Pa$coe's pocket, for the rest of your life?  And DMSO never "breaks down in the
lungs"; the body simply metabolizes DMSO, and one of those metabolites can
evidence itself as that rather unimportant, very short-term, minor
"garlic-breath".
This rather rudimentary info about DMSO has been available for many decades, at:
http://www.dmso.org/
http://www.jacoblab.com/
So my considered opinion, is that the most "truly awful" thing about DMSO, is
that it is used as part of a cure that's stopping money from going into Pa$coe's
pocket!! How truly awful it is!!!

And Barrow$ has posted an ultra-lame statement by an "Eric F. Bern$tein, MD, who
hasn't even bothered to inform himself about this cure, (I'M BEING ULTRA-POLITE
HERE, SO I'M NOT USING TERMS SUCH AS BOZO, BLOCKHEAD, OR DIMWIT!!!), since he
doesn't even "get it", that the DMSO and Fluconazole must be COMBINED, whereas
he considers them SEPARATELY, (AND I AGREE, [with "Deluder" Bern$tein], THAT
NEITHER DMSO ALONE, NOR FLUCONAZOLE ALONE, ARE APPROPRIATE), as at:
http://www.rosacea-control.com/html/diflucan.html
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/193

So, (sigh...), (ROFL), (sigh...), those who make money from disease are still at
it, with misinformation, disinformation, innuendoes, aspersions and slurs, but
their lies and half-truth lies have still not rid them of this (DMSO +
fluconazole) cure.
I would like to once again thank Yahoo! for the free-group-board public-service
they supply, but I especially thank Yahoo!, for somehow not allowing this
[rosacea-cure] board to be deleted, (thus far), because I believe that those who
make money from disease, (and "they" are without any doubt, numerou$ and
decidedly pui$$ant), would do ANYTHING to suppress the news of this
revolutionary, momentous, (DMSO + fluconazole) cure.


Recently, (in Sept. 2007), I accessed the [rosaceans] board for about the third
time in all of 2007, and I happened across a poll there, asking what rosaceans
had used, on their rosacea.  I placed the (DMSO + fluconazole) cure there.  Mind
you, I did not post this to the [rosaceans] board, but only in an obscure poll
there.
A little later, I got the following email from Barrow$:
>>To:    "Dave Fleming" <fulltruth40@...>
>>From:    "Brady Barrows" <brady@...>
(brady at bradybarrows.com)
>>Subject:    your post
>>Date:    Mon, 10 Sep 2007 06:09:28 -1000
>>
>>Dave Fleming,
>>Your post has not been approved.  When you can bring forth some clear
>>evidence that it works, I may allow you to post. It has been years
>>and there is still no proof.  I have given you plenty of
>>advertisement for your 'cure.'  You only provide anecdotal reports.
>>Nothing to substantiate your claim.
>>Brady

I never even bothered to answer Barrow$, but I will answer him here, for the
sake of all mankind.  First of all, WHO coined the term, "anecdotal evidence",
or "anecdotal proof", which is defined as automatically unreliable?  It was the
weasel-white-coats, who make money from "grant$", normally based only on
pompous, pretentious, "double-blind clinical-studies".  So THEY want you to
think that "double-blind, clinical studies" are fool-proof, and all "anecdotal
proof" is unreliable; BUT THAT IS A LIE.

"Double-blind" simply means that placebos are used, compared to whatever is
being tested, and neither the "testers" nor the "testees" know which is which
--- hence, both those who run the tests, and those who are taking the placebos
and drugs, are "blinded", not knowing who's taking the placebos or other drugs. 
Theoretically, this "double-blindness" is supposed to keep anyone from "skewing"
the results of the tests, either intentionally or unintentionally.

So, since the term "anecdotal proof" was coined by conde$cending, di$honest,
white-coat liar$, let's change this inaccurate name, "anecdotal", to an HONEST
name, "EXPERIENTIAL evidence", or "Experiential Proof".
After all, it was the EXTENSIVE, double-blind, clinical-studies required by the
FDA, that gave us Thalidomide and, more recently, Vioxx, and those drugs
horribly crippled or KILLED untold numbers of people.

And it was only Anecdotal/Experiential Proof, that forced those deadly drugs to
be withdrawn.
In fact, both "Double-Blind, Clinical Proof" and "Anecdotal/Experiential Proof"
can be either accurate or inaccurate, depending on the motivation, character,
honesty, competence, and accuracy of the persons creating and reporting the
"proof".
That's why I cautioned everyone, against "biased research" by
"rosacea-profiteers", in my post entitled, [Can We Trust "research" Run By
"rosacea profiteers"???].
Knowing Barrow$' five-year track-record, concerning this (DMSO + fluconazole)
cure, would YOU trust any "proof" HE might help to concoct, even in
holier-than-thou, double-blind, clinical-$tudie$?  I wouldn't.  And if you have
any problem answering this question, you can refer to my 08FEB05 post, at:
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/258

So I have good news, and bad news.  The good news, is that lots of excellent,
accurate, Experiential Proof exists for this (DMSO + fluconazole) cure.  The
[rosacea-cure] board abounds with high-quality, Experiential Evidence, and even
Barrow$' "Diflucan Diary" had it, (so Barrow$ has made it very
difficult/impossible to find, at [rosaceans], as of Jan. 2008, because he shut
down the links to it that he provided before).  Only because I have the old URL
listed in [rosacea-cure] message #264, I know it's at:
http://www.rosacea-control.com/html/diary2.html
The bad news, is that Barrow$ doesn't seem to care about "Experiential Proof",
(even his own!).  Is he just grasping at straws, to find any means to justify
his actions, (and inactions), concerning this cure, which he religiously refers
to, as "cure", (never, ever forgetting his imposed "quotation marks")?  You be
the judge, dear Reader.

But let's admit, that since there are a lot of things that are "INCONVENIENT"
about this cure, (when FACIAL "infestations" are cured), the
"rosacea-profiteers" are actually not responsible to promote it, (unless they
ask for God's compassionate viewpoint, as to what they should do).

So what is the problem??? Why hasn't this cure taken off, like a thunderous
rocket to the moon???

I saw one tantalizing, tentative example a while back, on the TV show,
"Dr.90210", on the "E" channel.  It aired once before, and then repeated, on
11DEC07.  This time, I watched more closely.  A patient, (I think her name was
"Halley"), received what was referred to as a "Chemical Peel" on her entire
face.
Frankly, I don't know everything about the comprehensive definition of all
"Chemical Peels", so I could be completely wrong about this, but IT SEEMED TO ME
THAT THEY WERE USING (DMSO + fluconazole)!!!
They used a "paint brush", just as I had learned to do, to apply a clear,
water-thin liquid that looked just like the med I've been using.
But of course, the "visual" appearance didn't really "prove" anything.
The clincher, to me, was that this fairly refined woman in Beverly Hills said,
"It hurts like a mother!".  Well, she obviously had shortened this from
"mother-effer", which meant she was really "emphasizing" this. :-)
Then, obviously still searching, for how she might describe this prolonged
stinging, she said, "It stings like a swarm of bees!".
Concerning such noteworthy stinging, you will find my statement at the very
beginning, in r-c message #2, at:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/2
I said, "Although there had been a very powerful itching on my hand, (from
healing), there had been hardly any sensation at all, in my toes, or on my hand,
but the stinging on my face, making my eyes water and my nose run, was perhaps
the most intense stinging I have ever felt in my life, and it lasted a very long
time, (I timed it once at a solid ten minutes)".  Of course, most significantly,
this med has virtually no effect whatsoever, on healthy skin, (facial or
elsewhere).

I have since come to the belief, that there are certain types of
highly-sensitive nerve-endings on the face and scalp, that exist nowhere else. 
And these "infestations" bind themselves so integrally to the cells of the nerve
endings, that this initial stinging occurs in cures of the face and scalp.  But
such stinging is much less, in cures of "infestations" on the arms, and even
nonexistent, when this med is used on the feet.  Recognizing this
"sensitivity-difference" of nerve endings is just common sense.  In all cases,
(even when no stinging occurs), the "infestation" is revealed by obvious changes
in the APPEARANCE of the skin, when this med is applied to "diseased" skin, but
this (DMSO + fluconazole) med has a virtually ZERO effect, on healthy skin.

The "Dr.90210" derm waited a full three weeks, before they asked "Halley" how
she felt, and she said she was very happy with the results, of her "Chemical
Peel".
After seeing that show, I was convinced that this Dermatologist was MOST LIKELY
using the same (DMSO + fluconazole)-med I have been using.  But it occurred to
me, that "Halley" never asked, nor was told, what that "Chemical-Peel" med
contained.  So that weasel-white-coat derm was PROBABLY using (DMSO +
fluconazole), getting the curative results, but KEEPING IT A SECRET, SO AS TO
AVOID ANY ATTACK FROM "ANTI-CURE FORCE$".
Wow, is it possible that I'm right about this???  We'll probably never know for
sure, because the dermatologist can't be forced to divulge the ingredients of
that "Chemical Peel", or they might even lie, and state false or partial
ingredients.

Another case of this general nature occurred years ago, when I accidently
discovered "Dr. Syrokomsky", way down on "page 9", in some random Googling.
I consider it a miracle, that Dr. Syrokomsky's statements and photo-evidence can
be found at all, (and even this archive may "disappear"), because this archive
shows that, by June 4, 2006, the "rosacea-profiteers" had completely erased his
website from the Internet, and commandeered it, replacing it with
"ro$acea-profiteer" website$!!!
It took some sleuthing, to find out that the present-day, (Jan. 2008), website
of Dr. Syrokomsky has added a "y" to his name.  What used to be:
http://www.dr.syrokomsky.com
is now,
http://www.dr.syrokomskyy.com
The tell-tale evidence of what appears to be a "battle to survive" by Dr.
Syrokomsky, is in an archive, on two pages, at:
http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.dr.syrokomsky.com
and, (with the extra "y"),
http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.dr.syrokomskyy.com

This proves that Syrokomsky's website name was somehow "co-opted" by
"rosacea-profiteers", by June 4, 2006, and his website did not reappear, until
Nov. 2, 2006, with the new "www.dr.syrokomskYY.com" name.

So there has been an apparent effort by "rosacea-profiteers", to get rid of Dr.
Syrokomsky, BUT WHY???
It's fairly easy, to fake "cure photos" such as those he's posted.  And his
statements make his cures of FACIAL problems seem a bit "inconvenient", EXACTLY
LIKE A (DMSO + fluconazole) CURE DOES.
FRANKLY, I STILL CANNOT BE SURE THAT HE'S USING (DMSO + fluconazole), BUT IT HAS
ALWAYS SEEMED CERTAIN TO ME THAT HE HAS BEEN, FOR THREE REASONS:

(1)  One of Dr. Syrokomsky's statements about his cures has never changed. 
Namely, he has said, "I cure rosacea... ...We trigger inflammatory
response/reaction in the affected areas. It's done on purpose and characterized
by redness and peeling of the skin. First few weeks 1 - 1.5 months for men and
up to 2 months for women procedures are painful; you will experience burning
sensation in the affected areas".
This description of his cures was so identical to what I had been describing on
the [rosacea-cure] board, that it grabbed my attention.

(2)  If you look closely at his (rosacea) photo evidence, as at:
HOME PAGE:
http://www.dr.syrokomskyy.com/eng-page1.html
ROSACEA:
http://www.dr.syrokomskyy.com/eng-page31.html
http://www.dr.syrokomskyy.com/eng-page313.html
http://www.dr.syrokomskyy.com/eng-page3131.html
http://www.dr.syrokomskyy.com/eng-page314.html
http://www.dr.syrokomskyy.com/eng-page315.html
, you find that the time-periods required for his cures are also identical to
the (DMSO + fluconazole) cure,
with initial, clearly-effective curative-results within 1 to 4 months, and a
100% cure shown after one to two YEARS.
Of course, curing me 100% took longer, because I was so conservative at first,
about how much med I used, and I only applied it TOPICALLY.  Only recently,
(since April 2006), I determined that combining TOPICAL APPLICATIONS with the
INGESTION of the CORRECT DOSAGE of (DMSO + fluconazole) is quite effective, even
giving striking, "whole-body" curative results.

(3)  "Rosacea-Profiteers" seem to be extraordinarily interested in getting rid
of and/or discrediting Dr. Syrokomsky.  WHY is this so, if he's a fake??? 
Especially on Pa$coe's [ro$acea-$upport] group board, a SEARCH for "Syrokomsky"
brought up 45 messages posted there, (as of Jan. 2008), showing a long-term
strategy to promote fear and rejection of what has been found on Syrokomsky's
website.  The most recent ploy, is to encourage posts by "someone" claiming to
be a patient of Dr. Syrokomsky.  His group is at:
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/Syrokomsky-Protocol/messages/1
These posts seem particularly unclear and unscientific, (to say the least),
concerning the specific INGREDIENTS of whatever meds he uses.  And he definitely
emphasizes and expounds on his "suffering".  It looks completely contrived to
me, and calculated to discredit Dr. Syrokomsky's cure-claims.  And this kind of
"covert attack" on Dr. Syrokomsky seems familiar to me, since this (DMSO +
fluconazole) cure has also been under "attack", by deceivers.
~~~~~~~END OF THREE REASONS~~~~~~~
So my final belief, is that the odds are "1 in a gazillion", that "some other
cure" exists, that causes these EXACTLY IDENTICAL, (and inconvenient, ONLY on
FACIAL skin), characteristics, of unusually-strong initial-stinging, and
subsequent "inflammatory response/reaction", (i.e. positive, curative,
immune-system activity), leading to an ultimate 100% cure, of rosacea.

To top all this off, Dr. Syrokomsky is not divulging all the INGREDIENTS of the
meds he uses, (just like the "dr.90210" derm).
SO, NO ONE CAN POSSIBLY KNOW, OR EVER FIND OUT, WHETHER (DMSO + fluconazole) IS
BEING USED IN THESE CASES!!!

And another "inside joke", is that, even since May 2002, a link has existed,
(i.e. http://rosacea-control.com), at the bottom of Dr. Syrokomsky's first
rosacea-photo page, TO (of all places), Barrow$' website!!!  So, for the last
six years, this link has been allowed by Dr. Syrokomsky's Webmaster, (possibly
without Dr. S's knowledge or consent), where some of Barrow$ first text reads,
"You want the Good News or the Bad? The Bad News is there is no cure for
rosacea. The Good News is that there are ways to control it".
Absolutely "Roll On the Floor Laughing", and that's what that good ol' Webmaster
Barrow$ must be doing, for this ongoing coup, in somehow keeping his "link" on
Dr. Syrokomsky's website; and even today, (Jan. 2008), it is STILL to be found,
at the bottom of the page, at:
http://www.dr.syrokomskyy.com/eng-page31.html
, with Barrow$, (at http://rosacea-control.com), continuing to absolutely deny
every cure that Dr. Syrokomsky claims!!!  Oh, the humanity...

To make things even more absurd, it has occurred to me, that Dr. Syrokomsky is
using so many ingredients, that he may have just happened to "throw in" some
DMSO and fluconazole, along the way, and even HE might not realize, that it's
the (DMSO + fluconazole) that's giving him his curative results.  But my FIRM
BELIEF, is that he and the "dr.90210" derm both know very well what they're
doing.  But they're secretive about it, to minimize attacks against them by
"anti-cure force$", and even more importantly, TO MAXIMIZE THEIR OWN PROFIT$, BY
INTENTIONALLY OBSTRUCTING THIS (DMSO + fluconazole) CURE FROM IMMEDIATELY COMING
TO ALL MANKIND.

So one problem, in promoting this (DMSO + fluconazole) cure, (and in knowing the
worldwide progress of its use), is that even those doctors that prescribe or
administer it, may not want the formidable "anti-cure force$" to know.  Doctors,
after all, can be fairly vulnerable to "attacks", especially from within the
medical community itself.  And since the wide-spread, immediate use of this cure
would probably put so many doctors out of business, (especially doctors in
Laser/IPL), that community does have the corrupt motivation to "attack and
suppress".

Even early on, by June 2003, I had created a group called
[new-rosacea-treatment], with the board not open to public viewing.  In that
group, I naively thought that doctors and patients would be able to privately
discuss and share their experiences with [DMSO + fluconazole].  But no one ever
joined that group, probably because doctors can be quite wary, if there are any
possible "anti-cure force$" around.  If anyone wants to see it, it's at:
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/new-rosacea-treatment/
That [new-rosacea-treatment] group is a monument to my positive attitude about
this cure, which in this case might also be called my naiveté.  :-)

I hope and pray that this 6-year REVIEW helps.
God Bless, ITN & IDFN,
Dave Fleming



---------------------------------
Never miss a thing.   Make Yahoo your homepage.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

For Everyone,
It is now my opinion, that even "mild" cases of rosacea should receive higher
doses of this (DMSO + fluconazole) med, (as approved by your doctor;), as stated
below in this email I sent recently, to "Dan".  I hope this helps.
God Bless, ITN & IDFN,
Dave Fleming - EMAIL TEXTS FOLLOW, (in reverse chronological order)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dave Fleming wrote:
Hi, Dan,
  Yes, I'm "still cured", but this cure does not remove the damage already done
to the skin, so I still have two small purple veins that show a little on the
left side of my nose, where this med cured the beginnings of Rhinophyma that I
had there.  Also, I have some "Celtic" ancestors, so I have red hair, with a
normally "ruddy/pink complexion".  Therefore, the parts of my cheeks close to my
nose, where I had the rosacea, are still "pink".  But all of this skin, on my
nose and on my cheeks, is obviously healthy now, with no rosacea
disease/problems.

  Also, I am still in the process of curing a "nasal/sinus" infestation that has
required higher doses of this med, including INGESTING some of this med, (in
order to permeate the "sinus cavities" in the face completely). This is stated
in my most recent posts, at:
  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/

  MOST IMPORTANTLY, I HAVE COME TO THE OPINION THAT EVEN "MILD" CASES OF ROSACEA
SHOULD BE TREATED/CURED WITH AGGRESSIVE, HIGHER DOSES OF THIS MED,
ADMINISTERED/ABSORBED INSIDE THE NASAL PASSAGE, AND THEN INGESTED, (as approved
by your doctor;).  I say this not only because I believe that all rosacea is
most likely progressive and ends up as horrendous Rhinophyma, (after perhaps
decades of "growth"), but because such larger doses, (i.e. 6 to 24 mg of
fluconazole content per kilogram of body weight), will cure other
infestations/diseases throughout the body, although I believe it, (i.e. [DMSO +
fluconazole]), also has to be applied topically in addition, wherever it is
needed.

  To explain more, I will just state that this is not "my cure", but is a Rx
that's been prescribed by USA doctors since 1998, for "nail fungus".  However, I
discovered "by accident" in 2001, that it also cures many other diseases.
  Also, in most of the rest of the world, (outside the USA), this (DMSO +
fluconazole) med is legal and doesn't even require a prescription, because it is
so safe/benign.
  I hope this helps.
  God Bless, ITN & IDFN,
  Dave Fleming

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Date:     Tue, 31 Jul 2007
From:    Dan - [ID deleted]
To:    fulltruth40@...
Subject:    Cure

Can you explain more about the cure you have.  Also, are you still
cured?  Thanks.

Dan


---------------------------------
Looking for a deal? Find great prices on flights and hotels with Yahoo!
FareChase.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

For Everyone,
Here is some of my ongoing ranting and gaffing, in answering a recent inquiry
about the availability, (or lack of same), of this curative med/Rx in the USA. 
And I am pleased to see that G. Nase is continuing to get his heaven-sent
comeuppance, as all nemesitical nematodes do, in the end.  Take a look:
http://www.debunkingnase.org/index.php?title=Main_Page
God Bless, ITN & IDFN,
Dave Fleming

Dave Fleming wrote:
Hi, Nicole,
I believe that some positive changes are taking place, concerning the
availability of this med/Rx in the USA.  Of course, MY advice, is that you
should "cut off your funding" to any doctor that refuses to write this benign,
[(90% DMSO/10% water) + 10% Fluconazole + 2% Ibuprofen] Rx for you, and find a
doctor who WILL help you, even if he has to ask you to sign a "liability
release" form, for his (corrupt) insurance company.
And just let me "RAVE" a little bit here, Nicole.
Even though this Rx has not "caught fire" in popularity as it should have, (at
least not here in the aberrant-FDA-controlled USA), I would like to state
plainly, that this (DMSO + Fluconazole) med
IS THE BIGGEST MEDICAL BREAKTHROUGH SINCE PENICILLIN.

I say this, not only because it cures horrible, debilitating diseases that have
thus far been incurable, but because it appears obvious that these diseases are
caused by "entities" that are NOT single-celled, which means that they CANNOT
"become resistant", as has happened with the single-celled germs affected by
penicillin/antibiotics.

Of course, this (DMSO + Fluconazole) cure is a "hard sell", for rosacea, (i.e.
on the face), because there is a period of time in which we must "look worse,
before we look better".  Also, a 100% cure can take weeks, months, or even
years, depending on how aggressively the med is used.
There is also the "arrogant-frightened-white-coat factor".  "White-coats" is a
term I use derisively, for those doctors, compounding-pharmacists, researchers,
butchers, etc. who wear the "white coat", to convince us to trust them.

Medical doctor$ make their living by convincing us that they're competent to
tell us what's best for us.  (And brain-washing TV-shows like "House" attempt to
make us excuse even doctors' "crimes/failures/mistakes".)
There are many aspects of DMSO that remain a complete mystery, in spite of over
11,000 clinical studies on it, (proving its safety and UNIQUE usefulness),
during the last 40+ years, as at:
http://www.jacoblab.com
http://www.dmso.org
After 15 years of hemming and hawing, (and convoluted, brilliant lies by "Big
Pharma", that DMSO caused "eye-lens light-diffraction changes"), it was finally
approved by the FDA for human use, in 1978.  This has meant, (under the rather
perverse rules of the USA medical system), that any doctor could legally and
ethically include DMSO in any Rx they've deemed fit, since 1978.
But have they been writing Rx's containing DMSO?
The answer appears to be "few and far between" if at all.
So any doctor, (or Compounding Pharmacist), who refuses to deal with DMSO, is
simply proving that they put their own arrogance and/or ignorance, above your
health and/or cure.
So bear in mind that white-coats hate, (and refuse) to say, "I don't know",
(e.g. concerning how DMSO works) , and they hate your questioning their
"qualifications".  Case in point: Geoffrey Nase.  Nase has made outlandish, even
absurd claims that DMSO, as used in this (DMSO + Fluconazole) med, will harm
you.
But he'$ lying, plain and $imple!!!
Na$e has repeatedly claimed that he knows what causes rosacea, even though the
entire medical field says they don't know.  Na$e has made the classic "mistake"
of trying to claim his schooling in diabetic, blood-vessel disorders makes him
an expert on rosacea.  But to apply this/his claim, he has to convince you, (and
himself), that ro$acea "is caused by a blood-ve$$el di$order".  Of course,
laughably, he doesn't know what causes the "blood-vessel disorder", but he
skirts that issue.
Nase constantly calls himself "Dr. Nase" but he's not a doctor, just a PhD.  And
the two schools he attended do not encourage the title of "Dr." by PhD grads,
even by their own PhD professors.
But Geoffrey Nase continues to refer to himself as "Dr.".
Of course, I'm sure that there might even be Medical Doctors, (especially in
la$er/IPL work for ro$acea), who might be willing to tell the same lies, in
order to keep "their busine$$", rather than allowing rosaceans to be cured with
(DMSO + Fluconazole).
So should we believe Nase, and his ilk?
In fact, should we trust him at all?  Take a look:
http://www.debunkingnase.org/index.php?title=Main_Page
http://www.debunkingnase.org/index.php?title=Our_comments_about_the_Indiana_Tria\
l
http://www.rosacea.co.uk/blog/2005/10/dr-nase-court-case-indiana-star-report.htm\
l

So the most public detractor of this (DMSO + Fluconazole) cure has met a fate
worse than death, (to him), (i.e. he'$ been ab$olutely di$credited).  Not to be
pompous, I say that God's Will certainly seems to be proceeding in this matter,
as I touched on it at:
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/249
, where I warned Nase, concerning the Biblical Scripture that "all liars shall
have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone."  Thank God,
(and the creators of www.debunkingnase.org); and may God richly bless them, for
their courage and sacrificial work on the side of truth and justice.
Another thing you have to face, Nicole, (in my humble opinion), is that your
"mild case" of rosacea will progress and get worse and worse, until you use
(DMSO + Fluconazole).  I cannot "prove" this to you, but it appears obvious,
that TEMPORARILY "treating/controlling rosacea symptoms" is not advisable,
because it appears to allow the "ROOT CAUSE" of the disease to continue to grow
and do more IRREVERSIBLE damage to your skin.

So I cannot force USA doctors to "do the right thing", concerning the
prescribing of this (DMSO + Fluconazole) med, but you can, Nicole.  It is only
YOU, the patient, who can DEMAND this Rx.  Once you come to understand the
"whole truth" about this situation, it will infuriate you as much as it does me,
that ANY doctor would refuse to prescribe this absolutely benign, curative med,
that does indeed cure hitherto incurable diseases.
I hope this helps.
God Bless, ITN & IDFN,
Dave Fleming
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Nicole {ID deleted}
Date: Fri May 4, 2007
Subject: Re: [rosacea-cure] Completely Curing Me, With High Dosage (DMSO +
Fluconazole)

Hi Dave:

    Thanks for your very informative email.  I have a mild case of rosacea.  Are
doctors prescribing this DMSO + Fluconazole or is it hard to find doctors that
will prescribe it?
I used to use {product-claim deleted} and then it just stopped working.  I just
started seeing a new dermatologist who of course has me using {product-claim
deleted}.  He said it takes about two months to work.  But, we shall see.  I
appreciate your response back.

    Sincerely,

    Nicole Hansen

Dave Fleming <fulltruth40@...> wrote:
Higher dosages/amounts of (DMSO + Fluconazole) are evidently needed,
and produce more comprehensive cures, than the very low dosages I've
been using and advocating, since April 2003 on this [rosacea-cure] board.
First, I'm pasting the following cures I've experienced,
as I listed them, at:
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/278
THE FOLLOWING LIST IS COPIED FROM THERE:
So, what have I cured on myself?
(1) very extensive case of nail fungus on both big toes, and minor fungus in my
left thumbnail
(2) stealthy, extensive/deep "infestation" on the back of my left hand
(3) rosacea on both cheeks and beginning rhinophyma on my nose
(4) athlete's foot, (including occasional bleeding cracks between toes and
decades-long reoccurring pus-filled "fungal blisters") on both feet
(5) one obvious "liver spot", (i.e. tinea versicolor), on my left forearm
(6) three or four "nondescript spots/areas", on my left forearm
(7) stealthy "infestation" on the back of my right hand, (very different from
what was on my left hand)
(8) "chronic low-level inflammation" of a spot at the top of my "butt crack",
(sorry, I don't know the scientific name for this spot, other than "adjacent to
coxis bone at bottom of spine") --- I had to have serious surgery to "lance a
boil" at this spot in 1976
(9) probable cure of a probable "infestation" of my vocal cords, which hindered
my singing since about 1989
(10) possible cure of possible "internal infestation" inside my upper right arm
muscle, (possibly caused/introduced decades ago by past hypodermic needle
injection)
(11) "infestations" inside both outer ears, which manifested occasionally for
decades, like painful "internal boils", especially when I was under stress
(12) Most importantly, I have probably cured other "infestations" in my body,
without even knowing I had them or cured them.
On Going Cures With End In Sight:
(A) nasal and sinus "infestations"
(B) whole scalp, ears, neck and forehead very extensive "stealthy infestation",
(possibly "ringworm"???)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Concerning the above listed "On-Going Cures", "(A)" and "(B)", higher dosages
have proven to be safe, needed, and effective, in my current experience.
----MESSAGE TRUNCATED----




________________________________________________________________________________\
____
Finding fabulous fares is fun.
Let Yahoo! FareChase search your favorite travel sites to find flight and hotel
bargains.
http://farechase.yahoo.com/promo-generic-14795097

Higher dosages/amounts of (DMSO + Fluconazole) are evidently needed, and produce
more comprehensive cures, than the very low dosages I've been using and
advocating, since April 2003 on this [rosacea-cure] board.
First, I'm pasting the following cures I've experienced, as I listed them, at:
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/278
THE FOLLOWING LIST IS COPIED FROM THERE:
So, what have I cured on myself?
(1) very extensive case of nail fungus on both big toes, and minor fungus in my
left thumbnail
(2) stealthy, extensive/deep "infestation" on the back of my left hand
(3) rosacea on both cheeks and beginning rhinophyma on my nose
(4) athlete's foot, (including occasional bleeding cracks between toes and
decades-long, reoccurring, pus-filled "fungal blisters") on both feet
(5) one obvious "liver spot", (i.e. tinea versicolor), on my left forearm
(6) three or four "nondescript spots/areas", on my left forearm
(7) stealthy "infestation" on the back of my right hand, (very different from
what was on my left hand)
(8) "chronic low-level inflammation" of a spot at the top of my "butt crack",
(sorry, I don't know the scientific name for this spot, other than "adjacent to
coxis bone at bottom of spine") --- I had to have serious surgery to "lance a
boil" at this spot in 1976
(9) probable cure of a probable "infestation" of my vocal cords, which hindered
my singing since about 1989
(10) possible cure of possible "internal infestation" inside my upper right arm
muscle, (possibly caused/introduced decades ago by past hypodermic needle
injection)
(11) "infestations" inside both outer ears, which manifested occasionally for
decades, like painful "internal boils", especially when I was under stress
(12) Most importantly, I have probably cured other "infestations" in my body,
without even knowing I had them or cured them.
On-Going Cures With End In Sight:
(A) nasal and sinus "infestations"
(B) whole scalp, ears, neck and forehead very extensive "stealthy infestation",
(possibly "ringworm"???)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Concerning the above listed "On-Going Cures", "(A)" and "(B)", higher dosages
have proven to be safe, needed, and effective, in my current experience.

So the time has come, for me to "talk frankly", about the maximum dosage that
can and should be used of this (DMSO + Fluconazole) med, BOTH AS TOPICAL
APPLICATION, AND AS INGESTED MED. I have always been very conservative about
dose amounts, because I have not wanted anyone to "overdose" because of any
recklessness on my part. But since I have entered the realm of "higher
doses/amounts" of this med, during the last few months, I have to communicate
this to you.
This does not mean that I've lost my conservative mind-set; I still do not want
to do permanent damage to my liver with too much Fluconazole/Diflucan content of
this med.
But I have experienced "whole-body, curative effects" from higher doses of this
med, (containing medically acceptable doses of Fluconazole/Diflucan), ESPECIALLY
WHEN INGESTED, (i.e. SWALLOWED), and I have to report this.
To clarify, ORAL Fluconazole is swallowed, and this (DMSO + Fluconazole) liquid
med can also be swallowed, but this should NOT be called ORAL (DMSO +
Fluconazole) administration.
A different term should/must be used, (i.e. INGESTED), because swallowing this
med is not the same as swallowing a capsule of Fluconazole/Diflucan.

There are many reasons for this distinction, but the main reason is that
swallowing this liquid med means that the Fluconazole content is going to be
"absorbed/trapped", (at least temporarily), by the tissues of the mouth,
esophagus, and perhaps the stomach and intestines; also, we simply do not know
whether the DMSO and Fluconazole molecules remain "linked", or "synergistic" in
some way, (and are therefore safer and/or more effective than ORAL Fluconazole
alone), as they make their way into and through the body. So, the overall
effects of this INGESTED (DMSO + Fluconazole) med MAY be very different, (i.e.
effective vs. ineffective), than the effects of taking ORAL Fluconazole tablets
or capsules.

We simply have no way of KNOWING this, and concerning this distinction, I don't
even like to "guess" about it. But my strong belief, is that a "higher
dosage/amount" of INGESTED (DMSO + Fluconazole) is effective in curing these
"stealthy disease entities" throughout the body, whereas ORAL Fluconazole is
not, (or is not AS effective). A major reason for this/my belief, is that the
(DMSO + Fluconazole) penetrates even inside each cell of the human body, whereas
Fluconazole alone only circulates in the bloodstream. Again, the only "proof" of
this I have, is as I mentioned, at:
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/193

So my belief is based mainly on thinking that the DMSO and Fluconazole molecules
continue to be "linked"/"synergistic", and work together throughout the body,
rather than separately. And I have absolutely no "proof" that this is true,
(other than my own experience with this med, since I have never taken ORAL
Fluconazole/Diflucan tablets or capsules). Incidentally, it MIGHT be effective
to COMBINE taking some ORAL Fluconazole/Diflucan with our use of TOPICAL and/or
INGESTED (DMSO + Fluconazole/Diflucan); I simply do not know, about this,
because I've never taken ORAL Fluconazole tablets or capsules.

Since I don't like to divulge my age and weight on the internet, I'm going to
speak in terms of "mg/kg" dosage, (of fluconazole content of the med), which is
the correct way, anyway, since it is the medically approved method of "dose
determination" for ORAL fluconazole.
one kilogram = 2.2045 pounds
one pound = 0.4536 kilograms

The DMSO content will be considered to be completely benign, (in the
doses/amounts associated with the use of this med), and determined by the med
used, (e.g. one ml of 10% med contains about one ml of DMSO, and one ml of 5%
med also contains about one ml of DMSO). In other words, even though it is not
exact, we can say that one milliliter of
[(90% DMSO/10% water) + 5% Fluconazole + 2% Ibuprofen],
and one milliliter of
[(90% DMSO/10% water) + 10% Fluconazole + 2% Ibuprofen],
and one milliliter of
[(90% DMSO/10% water) + 50% Fluconazole + 2% Ibuprofen]
each contain 0.9 ml of DMSO, which is about one milliliter of DMSO.

I recently, (April 2007), did some research and found information on the
medically accepted doses for ORAL Fluconazole/Diflucan, at the following URLs:
http://www.rxlist.com/cgi/generic/flucon_cp.htm
http://www.globalrph.com/renaldosing2.htm
************************************
http://www.mhra.gov.uk/home/idcplg?
http://www.google.com/search?q=cache:730gnLP0wIoJ:www.mhra.gov.uk/home/idcplg%3F\
\IdcService%3DGET_FILE%26dDocName%3Dcon009655%26RevisionSelectionMethod%3DLatest\
+\30mg/kg+fluconazole+in+dogs&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1&gl=us
************************************
http://aac.asm.org/cgi/content/abstract/43/12/2831
http://gateway.nlm.nih.gov/MeetingAbstracts/102205513.html
=================================================
THE FOLLOWING TWO URLs SPEAK OF 14 DAYS OF 400mg/day, (or 6mg/kg per day), and
800mg/day, (or 12mg/kg per day), dose of Fluconazole.
=================================================
http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/libra/cmro/pre-prints/3824;jsessionid=2mia\
\jo14kq9f0.alice
http://oberon.ingentaselect.co.uk/fstemp/929726a44c2059eb1a13fa30944f40ac.pdf
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

So 30mg/kg has been given ORALLY to dogs, daily, for weeks at a time, with "no
ill effects". There are two "levels" of medically acceptable dosages for ORAL
Fluconazole/Diflucan human use:
400mg per day = 6mg/kg for an "average" 67kg, (i.e. 150 lb), person.
800mg per day = 12mg/kg for an "average" 67kg, (i.e. 150 lb), person.
In giving ORAL Fluconazole/Diflucan, the first day's dose is called the "loading
dose", and is double the following daily doses. So if the intention is to give a
daily dose of 12mg/kg, for perhaps two weeks or longer, the first day's dose
would be 24mg/kg.

I did not keep a journal, so the following facts are "from memory".
On Sept. 4th, 6th, and 8th of 2006, I laid down on a bed, with my head hanging
over the edge, to keep my nasal passages upside-down, and I used a glass
"eye-dropper" to put
[(90% DMSO/10% water) + 25% Fluconazole + 1% Ibuprofen]
into my nose, which contained a Fluconazole dose of 6mg/kg, according to my
rather high body weight. I kept the med in my nasal passage, for 15 to 30
minutes, and then I "snorted in" the med and "secretions", and swallowed them.
I repeated this treatment, on Nov. 24th, 26th, and 28th, 2006.
Results were good, (given that no other cure exists), with very
slowly-manifested, beneficial lessening of "nasal blockage". But I was being
extremely conservative with this dosage of med, partially because of my
"restricted budget", but mostly because I don't want the invasive "blood tests"
necessary, to guarantee that no "side-effect, permanent liver-damage" might
occur, as it's listed in "possible side-effects" of ORAL Fluconazole/Diflucan,
as at:
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/111

During December 2006, I finally measured the total volume capacity of my nasal
passages. I put my head back and filled my nose with distilled water; I found
the volume to be exactly 20 ml, and I learned three things:

(1) There was some discomfort, (i.e. slight pain), when this distilled water
filled my nose. Since pain is the indication that this med is needed, I made a
mental note, that pain inside the sensitive nasal passage MIGHT be caused by the
(DMSO + fluconazole) med, even if this med is NOT "needed". In ALL topical
applications, any change in appearance of the skin, and/or pain or itching upon
application of this med, ALWAYS means that this med is "needed", since this med
has virtually NO effect on healthy tissue. However, because of the curative
effects in my nasal passages, (although it's been very slow, since I've just
been applying the med with Q-tips), during the last five years, I'm very sure
this med has been and is "needed", in my nasal passages and associated "sinus
cavity".

(2) My knowledge of physiology is lacking, because I did not know that the two
sides of the nasal passage become one, before entering the throat. In other
words, I found that, (with my head back), when I voluntarily closed off the
connection to my throat, (breathing through my mouth), and put water in one
nostril, the other nostril also filled with water. So unless "nasal congestion"
blocks it, even putting the med in only one nostril will treat the entire nasal
passage on both sides.

(3) With 20 ml total volume, even a total of 10 ml of med would treat/"soak" the
entire nasal passage on both sides, if you at first lie on your back with your
head back, (treating/"soaking" the "sinus cavities" area), and then hold your
nose closed with your fingers and sit upright, (treating/"soaking" the entire
inside of the lower nose).

On April 2, 2007, I put a dose of
[(90% DMSO/10% water) + 25% Fluconazole + 2% Ibuprofen]
into my nasal passages which contained
over 18mg/kg of Fluconazole.

On record, concerning an "overdose" of ORAL Fluconazole/Diflucan, there is one
case of a 42-year-old man who took 8,200 mg, at:
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/111
If he was of "average weight", of 150 lbs, (i.e. 67 kg),
this was a dose of 124mg/kg.
The effects were rather strange. It says that he "had hallucinations", and "was
paranoid". He was hospitalized, and the effects ended after two days. He
appeared to have "no permanent damage", and he was released.
I mention this case, because I think I MAY have had some "false, olfactory
sensory-input", caused by my application of this med in my nasal passages. Back
in Sept. and Nov. 2006, after even just a 6mg/kg single dose, I was smelling
something like "lighter fluid", off and on, for a couple of days.
After the April 2007,
18mg/kg single, nasal, (and INGESTED), dose,
I was smelling what seemed to be "auto-exhaust fumes", for the next ten days. 
It was hard to tell, if it was a "real" smell or not. Without other people to
tell you there is no such smell, it is a "real smell", although it did not cause
me any discomfort whatsoever, waking or sleeping.
It was not the "rotten-eggs" smell of emission-control exhausts, but the heavy,
"sweetish" smell of the old auto exhausts. Since I knew this must be an
"inaccurate sensory-input", it did not bother me. But given the deadly effects
of the carbon monoxide in auto exhaust, I could have become quite "paranoid".
:-)

Whether this disease and cure has permanently damaged my ability to smell, is
still to be determined, (which will be about two months after the 100% cure and
last application of the med).  My present "smelling ability" seems to be
adequate, but may be "less than normal".
I've had only one place that actual "lesions" formed, during this cure, and that
was on my scalp. This was described, at:
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/278
These "curative lesions" were about half an inch in diameter, and were deep,
which meant that "new, healthy scalp" had to grow in from the edges, which
required about a month or longer. At first, the scabs covering these raised
lesions were easy to remove, because they were "floating" on an area that was
obviously being acted on by my immune-system. After a couple of weeks, these
scabs became flat, and were "firmly attached" like any normal scab, making it
impossible to remove them, except by "soaking and washing", in the shower.

In the nasal passage, there has been a similar pattern.
The main difference, is that "scabs" in the nasal passages impede the air-flow,
and therefore must be removed daily. So at the bottom of the nose, which has
been treated for years, (with tiny amounts of med on Q-tips), there is healthy
tissue, and further up, there is some "permanent, firmly attached scabbing"
which is very thin and does not impede air-flow much.
Still further up, there is the "newly cured" area, with "floating scabs" that
are thicker, and can be physically removed easily, (using my pinky-finger). When
they are removed, there is some minor bleeding, which stops after a couple of
minutes of being absorbed by a kleenex.
On the scalp, I could easily apply the med even several times a day.
But in the nasal passages, because of the inconvenience, the pain, and my
decision to swallow all the med used, I have been very conservative, in the
number of med applications, and in the amount of med applied. Since I'm
presently experiencing good results, with almost all of the scabs in the nasal
passages being more "permanent", (i.e. in a "final cure" stage), (and thinner),
I'm satisfied with my ongoing results.

However, since I've put up with "nasal scabbing", and what amounts to a daily
"nose bleed", for the past several months, (and even years), I recommend a much
more aggressive application of this med, for anyone with this "nasal disease"
and/or "sinusitis". Perhaps the whole nasal cavity should be filled with med and
"soak" for 30 minutes, once or twice a day for at least a week, or even six
weeks; and perhaps it would be good to "snort out" the remaining med, rather
than INGEST it, to control dosage more closely.
THE FOLLOWING ARE MY TWO MOST IMPORTANT THOUGHTS, ON THIS:
(1) I'M NOT RICH, AND THIS MED IS STILL NOT REALLY CHEAP, (IN THE USA), SO I'VE
NEVER WANTED TO "SNORT OUT" AND DISCARD THE MED NOT ABSORBED IN THE NOSE WITHIN
15 TO 30 MINUTES, (AND ALSO BECAUSE I BELIEVE IT HAS "WHOLE-BODY, CURATIVE
EFFECTS); BUT "SNORTING IT OUT" WOULD ENCOURAGE MORE FREQUENT
"SOAKING/TREATMENT" OF THE NASAL PASSAGES, WITH ZERO POSSIBILITY OF "OVERDOSING"
THE FLUCONAZOLE CONTENT.

(2) ONE ALSO HAS TO STEADFASTLY IGNORE THE "NASAL/SINUS" PAIN THAT MAY OCCUR,
BECAUSE THIS PAIN DOES DECREASE A LOT, IF THE MED IS APPLIED FREQUENTLY.
************************************
************************************
Now, I'd like to tell you about my use of much larger dosages/amounts of
TOPICALLY APPLIED (DMSO + Fluconazole) med, during the last several months.
First, I have used a lot of
[(90% DMSO/10% water) + 10% Fluconazole + 2% Ibuprofen],
on my scalp, neck, ears, (and even inside my ears), AND FACE AND EYES, (about a
250 square-inch area).
I have also used a lot on my left forearm and hand, (about a 150 square-inch
area).
For economy's sake, I currently believe that
[(90% DMSO/10% water) + 5% Fluconazole + 1% Ibuprofen]
is just as effective, as the
[(90% DMSO/10% water) + 10% Fluconazole + 2% Ibuprofen],
since I can buy the 99%DMSO and add it to the Rx, to make it last twice as long,
as I clarified at:
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/278

It was MAY 2006, when I posted the info about my first "whole scalp, neck and
ears" treatments, as at:
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/278
You should read there, concerning my first really extensive, (i.e. over 200
square-inch area), TOPICAL applications of
[(90% DMSO/10% water) + 10% Fluconazole + 2% Ibuprofen].
Except for a small, 7-inch circle of about 2-inch-long hair at the top of my
head, I kept all my hair cut to a length of one-eighth inch, for this treatment,
but if you're willing to use more med, cutting the hair is not absolutely
necessary, since the med seems to have no effect on the hair.

Because I had gotten the price down some on the med, as at:
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/278
, I began to think of using it "by the liter", rather than "by the 15 ml bottle"
I had been prescribed during the preceding four years.
I must repeat here, that THE DIRECTIONS FOR USE OF THIS MED ON NAIL-FUNGUS, ARE,
"APPLY TWICE DAILY, FOR SIX WEEKS".
In fact, I now believe this med should be applied to the whole foot, rather than
just to the nails, because these "stealthy disease entities" appear to have
extensive areas of invisible infestation, which "support" the small area of
visible symptoms.
It MIGHT even be, that the mycotoxins such an infestation MAY put into your
bloodstream for decades from one part of your body, (e.g. your arm), would make
you vulnerable to get infestations in other parts of your body, (e.g. your
nose/face and/or your toenails).
As another example, way back in 2002, I cured an infestation on the back of my
left hand, and later cured a three-inch-wide area of infestation centered on a
"liver-spot", (i.e. tinea versicolor), on my left forearm. During the last few
months, I discovered that this was one huge, invisible/stealthy infestation,
which in fact extended from my hand all the way up to my elbow.
[And BTW, the extent of this "grown-back" infestation on the back of my left
hand was only about 1% or less, of what it was when I first cured it, in
2001-2002, with (DMSO + 1% Fluconazole + 2% Ibuprofen).]

Strangely, "this disease" seems to affect different types of skin in different
ways, so the "thickened, pale-white, dead, alligator-skin" made apparent by this
med on the back of my left hand is completely different than the "mottled, red,
bumpy-skin appearance" just three inches away, on my whole forearm. Of course,
the whole area looked "normal", before the application of the med.
Also, for some strange reason, the finger-skin, and the palm-skin on the front
of my hands seem to be completely "immune" to this "infestation"; the
infestation wrapped around the left hand, up to the "palm-skin", but stopped
there.

I went to a hardware store and bought a small, 1-inch-wide paintbrush. It was
cheap, (65 cents), and made of "natural bristles", in Indonesia. I washed the
brush very thoroughly with hot water and dish-washing soap, and rinsed it very
well, before using it, (because I don't want any "chemicals" from the brush
being brought into my skin by the DMSO in the med).
I used this brush, to "paint" my arm, with the med. I did not dip it in the main
med bottle, but poured about 5 or 10 ml into a small container; and each
application of the med took about 5 or 10 ml. And just as in painting, the med
would sometimes "run", and try to "drip", so I would catch the drips and keep
spreading the med around the arm for a couple of minutes, until it was partially
absorbed. Then, I would hold my arm in different positions for about 10 minutes,
to prevent the water-thin med from dripping.

I TREATED MY WHOLE ARM AND HAND, (including about 3 inches above my elbow, which
was not affected by the med), TWICE DAILY, FOR FIVE DAYS, with
[(90% DMSO/10% water) + 10% Fluconazole + 2% Ibuprofen].
I found that the "liver-spot" I had cured long ago, was surrounded by an
infestation that centered on it, but extended all the way up and around my
forearm, leaving just a thin strip of "least infested" skin, on the bottom of my
forearm.
AFTER FIVE DAYS OF TREATMENT, the whole forearm was pink and feverish, with a
few spots where the "infestation" seemed to be "rooted". And the back of my left
hand had a very thin layer of the same "alligator-skin" that was very much
thicker when I cured this back in 2001-2002. This was about two months ago, and
when I treated the whole arm again, a week ago, there was no longer any of the
stinging and itching I felt, when I applied the med every day for five days. So
I may treat this area again, in a year or two, but I believe that this "higher
dosage/amount" of the med has cured this area permanently, this time.

An interesting note, is that I've noticed a small "raised bump", on the second
joint of my middle finger, on my left hand. This "bump" has been a little sore
to touch/pressure, which normally denotes an area that is being cured by this
med. Since arthritis is one of the idiopathic diseases that I have suspected
might be caused or made worse by the mycotoxins put out by these "stealthy,
disease entities", [that are curable with (DMSO + Fluconazole)], I mention this
as a possible subject for long-term clinical studies. In my case, I intend to
continue to apply (DMSO + Fluconazole) to this finger and surrounding area,
(during the coming months and years), to see if this "bump" goes away
completely.
********************************************
********************************************
Now I'd like to describe my use of increased dosages/amounts of
TOPICAL (DMSO + Fluconazole) on my head. When I applied larger amounts of
[(90% DMSO/10% water) + 10% Fluconazole + 2% Ibuprofen],
on my scalp, neck and ears, (even INSIDE my ears), I decided to include my
entire face, to make sure of my past cure there. I found that there were a
couple of spots on my chin and below the left cheek, which showed some minor
"reaction", when the med was applied to the whole face. I also found that the
"normal looking skin" on my forehead also showed some "reaction". The parts of
the cheeks below my eyes, (which were long ago cured of rosacea), had no
"reaction", but showed some subsequent "dry skin", minor flaking, for weeks.

Most importantly, I had seen a few "white spots" on the inside of the bottom lid
of my left eye, so I treated that by pulling down the lid, and applying med
there with a q-tip.  This med caused some stinging there, but since this med
made with (90% DMSO/10% water) might normally cause stinging on such sensitive
mucus membranes, I continued to watch this area, to see if a cure was brought
about.
There were definite changes that proved to me that a cure of this area, around
the bottom eyelashes, did take place.
Furthermore, I liberally applied the med to my lightly-closed, (i.e. NOT
tightly-closed) eyes, and some later soreness to touch/pressure, around the left
eye, (but not the right eye), proved to me that this liberal application of the
med to my lightly-closed eyes was indeed having curative effects, especially
around, (and in?), the left eye.

So I'm more convinced than ever, that this (DMSO + Fluconazole) med will cure
ocular rosacea. At the same time, an eye-drop med formulated with a much lower
DMSO concentration would most likely be more appropriate, such as
[(6% DMSO/94% water) + fluconazole].
A couple of years ago, there was a med formulation said to prevent and cure
cataracts, containing glutathione in 6.25% DMSO. But it seems to have been
"erased" from EVERY AND ANY EXTENSIVE Google-Search I did today, (MAY 2007), by
otc products, (et al), that require you to use their eye-drops FOUR TIMES A DAY,
FOR 6 TO 12 MONTHS, AND DON'T EVEN GUARANTEE RESULTS IN CURING CATARACTS; this
smells like a "Big Pharma" conspiracy to me....
Digging VERY deep, I found a MAY 2004 message on the Yahoo! group
(DimethylSulfoxide-DMSO) board,
as at:
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/DimethylSulfoxide-DMSO/message/722
, In MAY 2004, Garnet wrote:
(FORMULA FOR Rx TO CURE CATARACTS):
---->DMSO - 6.25 percent
---->Vitamin C - 1.25 percent
---->Glutathione - 1.25 percent
---->QS Distilled Water
This was from a post to the Silver List. It is a formula credited to Dr Robert J
Rowen.
There is a phone number in the email as well 707.575.1313
Garnet
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
===>===>===>===>===>===>===>===>===>===>===>===>===>
EDITOR'S NOTE: Incidentally, I have known about this [DimethylSulfoxide-DMSO]
Yahoo! group since shortly after it was founded, in Jan. 2004, but I have never
"mentioned/advertised" it here on the [rosacea-cure] board, because I found that
the "hidden agenda" of the owner, "Garnet", is to sell products related to CS,
(i.e. Colloidal Silver). The group appeared with, (magically), over 400 members,
over three years ago, and there has been no appreciable increase in the number
of members, since then; (hmmmmmm). CS has a "spotty record", having been
discredited by the FDA, (possibly a compliment); subsequent sales of "home
CS-Generators" have effectively by-passed the FDA ban. Frankly, I don't know
what CS does or does not do, and "Garnet" has been putting a lot of interesting
and useful info on her board, about DMSO, so I'm finally mentioning it on this
[rosacea-cure] board, since her board appears to be the ONLY place I could find
ANY current mention of these (glutathione-in-6%-DMSO) eye-drops that
prevent/cure cataracts.
<===<===<===<===<===<===<===<===<===<===<===<===<===
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I called Dr. Rowen's office, (May 2007), and they were kind enough to inform me
that they were forced to stop writing most Rxs of this (glutathione in 6%DMSO)
formulation, because laws were changed about 18 months ago, (concerning
sterility of CP products), which made it too expensive for most Compounding
Pharmacies to produce any eye-drops. (I smell the feces of "Big Pharma's"
creating such laws, to make it almost impossible to find a CP to fill this Rx.)
All indications, are that Dr. Rowen is just as sure as ever, that these
eye-drops are safe and effective in at least preventing and stopping the
progression of cataract growth, since the word "cure" is forbidden, by current
FDA hocus-pocus. In fact, a spokesperson at "Second Opinion Newsletter" told me
that Dr. Rowen uses this (DMSO + glutathione) Rx every day, IN HIS OWN EYES,
(one drop per each eye, daily), to prevent cataracts. With great DIFFICULTY, I
found a CP who fills this Rx, (a one-month supply of these eye-drops), for $59.
Dr. Rowen can currently be reached through:
http://www.doctorrowen.com/
http://www.getprolo.com/california_rowen_prolotherapy.htm
http://www.secondopinionnewsletter.com/contact.php
, and perhaps through:
http://www.bioimmune.com/about_us/investor/press.asp?id=1
But I digress.
Having totally discredited those liars who have been claiming harm from this
(DMSO + Fluconazole) med, I want to encourage everyone that much larger
dosages/amounts of this med should most likely be used, to obtain the most
convenient, expedient, effective cure(s), (with your doctor's advice and
consent, of course;-). Even though the "mechanism" of this cure means that it
will take time, and patient persistence, (i.e. our immune system must work along
with the med effects), it can definitely be much faster than I have experienced,
with this new knowledge of the safety and effectiveness of more aggressive
dosage amounts, both TOPICALLY APPLIED, AND INGESTED.

I am almost totally cured now, of these "stealthy, insidious diseases" that are
curable ONLY with (DMSO + Fluconazole). If, in Nov. 2001, I had known what I now
know about this med, I would have no doubt been 100% cured years earlier.
I hope this helps.
God Bless, ITN & IDFN,
Dave Fleming


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

For Everyone,
This [rosacea-cure] group is just as "ACTIVE" as it ever was, even though this
board may appear less active now.  WE PLEAD WITH EACH PERSON READING THIS, TO
HELP SPREAD THE WORD OF THIS TRULY EFFECTIVE CURE TO EVERYONE POSSIBLE, AS
QUICKLY AS POSSIBLE.  And thank you for your help in this matter, for the sake
of all those who are suffering with these diseases.
   The sad fact is that the "hurry up" nature of "Clinical Studies" is not suited
to "proving" a cure such as this, which can take weeks or months, (or even
longer), to be 100% completed.
But the truth of this amazing cure will win out, in the end.
We continue to receive email from "Newbies" such as the one below, and we answer
them to the best of our ability.  The following was our answer to one such
inquiry, and contains some repeat info, for "Newbies" here.
God Bless, ITN & IDFN,
Dave Fleming --- EMAIL TEXTS FOLLOW, in chronological order ---

Dave Fleming wrote:
Hi, Susan,
Thank you for your interest in this treatment/cure, and my apologies for the
delay in answering you.  The present situation is
that we have to fight like hell to find a doctor to prescribe this simple,
benign med, or fight to get the ingredients and "mix it at home".
I certainly wish this cure were more widely recognized by now, especially in the
USA, where the "medical system" seems unable to easily assimilate this cure.
First, you should at least glance over message #278, at:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/278
Then, read:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/277
Then, you should read all of the 29 messages listed on the [rosacea-cure] Home
Page.
Posted on the Home Page, are:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/2
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/18
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/64
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/210
etc, etc, etc ------->
Most important, are messages #2, #18, #64, #170, #210, #261, #264, and #272,
#277
Also important, are messages #163, #187 thru #193, #197 thru #207, and #263.

   After reading all of that, you might look over all of the [rosacea-cure]
messages, (or "Search" there), for anything else that interests you.
   It's very difficult for me to advise you as to how you can get this med, (i.e.
DMSO and fluconazole), because I don't know the situation in Malta.  But DMSO
and fluconazole/Diflucan are fairly common, worldwide.  Someone told me they got
DMSO from the UK Ebay in the UK, and bought fluconazole on the Internet; then
they mixed their own med, as I posted at:
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/170
This is only necessary if you can find no doctor or Compounding Pharmacist to
help you to obtain this very simple and generally inexpensive
[(10% water/90% DMSO) + 10% fluconazole + 2% Ibuprofen] med.

If you are forced to "make it at home", buy the so-called "bulk" fluconazole if
possible, (rather than the capsules), since the capsules have other "excipient"
ingredients in them that are not needed.  However, in a pinch these "excipient
ingredients" will probably have no bad effects, even though they do sometimes
dissolve in the DMSO, which means that the DMSO "transports" some very small
amounts into our skin.  One very bad example of this though, is the Red Dye #40,
which is used to make fluconazole/Diflucan TABLETS.  These TABLETS should NEVER
be used, because it's really ridiculous to allow DMSO to carry this RED DYE into
our skin.
The Ibuprofen is not absolutely necessary, to make this med, in my opinion.

So as I understand it, it's completely legal to "mix your own med" in the UK,
(and in Australia), because fluconazole is so safe that it is legal to buy it
there without a prescription, and of course Pharmaceutical Grade DMSO is also
legal to buy.
   As for the nature of this treatment/cure, it's simple enough.  This med only
"reacts" on skin that is diseased, and has virtually zero effects on healthy
skin.  Therefore, it's easy enough to know whether this cure is "needed", no
matter what the doctors might "name" our "disease problem".  We know when we
apply the med, because it can cause stinging, or just a profound change, (for a
few hours), in the appearance of the diseased skin.
   But this cure is neither easy nor fast, and it can cause some unsightliness,
as it cures us.  But it is the only cure in existence, although so-called
"controls/treatments" may temporarily decrease ONLY the SYMPTOMS.  But to remove
this/these PROGRESSIVE disease(s), this cure is required.
If we just decrease the SYMPTOMS, (such as with laser or IPL), we only allow the
disease to PROGRESS and get worse later, so I see no alternative to this
treatment/cure.

In fact, I believe these diseases are constantly releasing damaging/poisonous
"mycotoxins" into our bloodstreams, (which affect our whole bodies), so we have
to use this (DMSO + fluconazole) cure to get rid of these "stealthy" parasitic
infestations, even if they are giving us no obvious symptoms.

   My guess, as to how this cure "works", is that it is exposing a parasitic
"entity" which has been growing in our skin for years, and even decades,
unnoticed.  This "entity" at first causes no symptoms, but finally does so much
damage to our own human cells, that our immune system begins to attack them, to
remove the "damaged cells".

We might call this attack by our immune system a "bad, ineffective attack",
since it has no effect at all on the progress of the underlying ROOT CAUSE of
the disease.

Then, when we apply this med and the "body mass" of this "disease entity" is
exposed, (i.e. either "killed" or stripped of its outer coating of protection
from our immune system), our immune system can finally attack it.  This "good,
effective attack" can cause us unsightly TEMPORARY symptoms of peeling or dry,
flaky skin and pinkness, (sometimes for weeks), and even a localized "fever",
(for a few days), in the affected skin.

   If only one application of the med were required, that would be great, but it
appears that many applications of this med are needed, (to gradually remove the
"body mass" of this "disease entity", layer by layer).  And "waiting periods"
are needed, (between med applications), of from one to four weeks to allow our
immune system to do its work.  With the right cream(s) and concealer make-up, we
can normally get through this unsightly problem without too much trouble.
   Also, it MIGHT be that this cure MIGHT be quicker, if we could live as a
hermit for six months, (so no one would see us), and apply this med at least
twice a day, which would most likely make us look "like Hell", until a couple of
months after we end the med applications.

   A "twice a day, for six weeks" application of the med is what is recommended
to cure nail fungus, and there must be completely different types of nerves in
the toes than in the face, because there is no stinging or sensation of any sort
whatsoever when this med is used on the toes and toe nails, although it can be
unsightly, because the diseased skin of the toe does usually peel, or "slough
off".  But nobody cares, if their toes look "like Hell".  It's the appearance of
our face that causes us "social humans", (and especially our females), concern,
and even psychological "damage".  Therefore, I recommend the "waiting periods
between med applications" method of this treatment/cure.

   In addition, our disease may have caused some "damage" to our skin, which may
or may not "show", after this cure is completed.  This kind of "damage" may be
pinkness, and even some tiny, (almost invisible) wrinkles, because the (probably
fungal) "disease entity" likes to live in and "eat" fat, so destroying this
"entity" may leave us with some fat missing, which may cause tiny wrinkles.

Of course, once the disease is cured, medical science has many methods of
treating or getting rid of this "damage", to improve our appearance.  However,
using such methods is disastrous, if we try to remove SYMPTOMS before curing the
ROOT CAUSE of the disease with this (DMSO + fluconazole) med, because we would
simply be allowing the ROOT CAUSE of the disease to continue to grow and do more
and more irreversible damage to our skin.

In short, we must use this cure, even though it is "inconvenient", because there
is no viable alternative.
I hope this helps.
God Bless, ITN & IDFN,
Dave Fleming
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Date: Oct 2006
From:  Susan, [Address Deleted]
To: fulltruth40@...
Subject: rosasea help

   hi
i  just  read  your  thoughts on the internet
as a  laywoman i wont pretend to understand
what  the components are
but  i suffer badly from this conplaint
more so now as i live in malta
an extremly hot country it is very hard to live here and keep cool
i have had lazer treatment 4 years ago at the local hospital
but it has come back worse
they are preparing to do lazer again but after reading
your words whilst i was looking for a natural way to cure it
it has made me think twice
please can you contact me and share yur knowledge with me
you seem to care enough to put pen to paper so to speak
and i would welcome your thoughts on the matter
i have it on my face and partially on my neck and chest
at the moment it is just severe reddness mistaken for severe sunburn
sometimes dry and icing
and once my whole area of the nect actually peeled off
doctors just call it dry skin and get me to test lots of moisterizers
but i feel like my skin cant breathe with all that greasy cream
and i have to work and it is so unsightly
i cant wear clothes that come into contact with my neck
as it will flare up
and even my hair if it touches my neck
i am fair and with golden blonde hair and my family are irish
so they often say its because of that
as if its normal to continue to suffer as its part of my heritage
thats why i found your views compelling reading
is there anyway you can send me an email
back with the solution and i will show it to my doctor and try to
get it here so i wont resort to laser
people used to say how pretty
yu are with those rosy cheeks now they think i have a disease
just yesterday whilst at the dentist he stopped working on me
and asked me what it was as i had arrived with a clear neck
and as i got hotter so did my neck and face red as a berry
it putting it mildly
i had to explain the movements of his hands were causing heat and
then i flare up again

PLEASE PLEASE HELP if you can

i have only redness and some small broken veins
and what the dr calls blood spots that if pressed turn back to white
obviously something wrong with the blood flow somewhere
but no one tells you enough
they just give you another cream
hope you are not eye weary my friend
i leave it in your hands and hope you will find the time to answer
this manuscript ha ha
sorry its so long but thank you for you views
its food for thought and i will check on it with your help
   Susan


---------------------------------
Get your own web address for just $1.99/1st yr. We'll help. Yahoo! Small
Business.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

For Everyone,
Here's some recent private email, covering more
"Theories of Mechanisms" of
[(10% water/90% DMSO) + 10% fluconazole + 2% Ibuprofen].

Most of the below is repeat info.  As is usual, my disclaimer is that this med
is definitely curing many previously "incurable" diseases, and whatever
"Theories of Mechanisms" I offer may or may not be correct, in trying to explain
these cures.  Most importantly, we never have to know how or why these cures are
occurring, to be cured by [DMSO + fluconzole].  :-)
God Bless, ITN & IDFN,
Dave Fleming --- Email texts follow, in reverse chronological order ----

   Dave Fleming wrote:
Hi, [name deleted],
   Other than the extensive info already posted on the [rosacea-cure] board,
there's very little else left to say, which is why I'm not taking so much time
to post a lot of unnecessary "messages" there.

   Geoffrey N. is NOT a doctor, (only a PhD), and he is obviously a liar,
concerning DMSO, and in my opinion he's the worst kind of liar, who's motivated
to cause human suffering, (and even deaths by suicide), for his own financial
gain.

   I have never heard of the disease, C-Difficile, nor of the drug Flagyl.  One
fellow who had some good results with Dr. Syrokomsky, told me that he thought
that Accutane is no better than "rat poison".  I tend to agree with him, even
though I've never taken it.

   So, I'm not a doctor, but my extensively considered opinion is that this med,
when used correctly, is extremely benign/safe.  And most amazingly, it is
self-diagnosing, because stinging, or itching, or a major change in appearance
of the skin occurs ONLY when [DMSO + fluconazole] is applied where it is
"needed", but this med has VIRTUALLY NO EFFECT ON HEALTHY SKIN.

   The "reality" of this cure, and the reason it has not "taken off like a house
on fire", (at least in the USA), is probably that this treatment/cure normally
makes you look worse, before you look better.  Since the human condition
includes ego, embarrassment, etc, concerning the appearance of our faces, this
cure is a "hard sell".  But it's the only cure that exists for this "stuff", so
thank God for it.
   Also, doctors in the USA are normally "owned" by "Big Pharma", so it may still
be a struggle to find a doctor to properly prescribe this safe, topical [(10%
water/90% DMSO) + 10% fluconazole + 2% Ibuprofen] treatment/CURE.  Add to that a
"conspiracy" to "fleece" patients by some Compounding Pharmacists overcharging
for this Rx, and you have a "Big Pharma blockade" that is difficult to overcome,
in the USA.

<Do you think I
<may have a fungal infection that is growing out of control?

   My take on this "stuff", is that it is very slow growing, and it is a "mass",
which spreads by growing microscopic, pointed "branches" called hyphae,
[hi'-fee].  Therefore, because it is not a single-celled "creature" that grows
by "splitting in two", it has no means of becoming "resistant" to this med, as
single-celled bacteria can become resistant to antibiotics through random
mutations that then multiply to become the predominant "germ".

   So this cure for these "fungal infestations" will most likely be effective
"forever", without any chance that these parasitic "masses" will ever be able to
"adapt" to escape being "killed".  Of course, this [DMSO + fluconazole] med may
just be destroying its "cell walls", rather than "killing" it outright.

   The plasma membrane cell walls of fungal cells contain ergosterol, but animal
cell wall membranes have cholesterol and plant cell walls have sitosterol and
other "phytosterols".  Fluconazole is known to block ergosterol synthesis, so it
can attack the fungal cell walls/membranes, while it has no effect on the
cholesterol in our "animal/human" cell membranes.

This means that it may simply be partially destroying the walls/membranes of the
cells of the "parasitic fungal mass", which destroys its "parasitic mask" to our
immune system.  Then, our "immune system" can finally attack and kill it, after
it may have been growing in us for decades, untouched.  During those decades,
this "mass" has been parasitic, which means that it "masks" itself from our
immune system, and therefore will completely "eat us up", (given a number of
decades), without our body ever being able to stop it.

   So even though this "stuff" may be weakened or even killed by the [DMSO +
fluconazole], our immune system can take weeks or even months to do its
subsequent job.  And since our immune system can cause redness, local "fever",
and even "peeling/flaking", as it "breaks down" and "carries away" this "stuff",
we may look "like Hell", as this cure slowly takes place.

   And another possible aspect of this, is that one application of the med may
only "affect" the "outer layers" of the "mass", so the med may have to be
applied repeatedly, until the "mass" is entirely gone.  Again, this can take
weeks and many months, of patiently waiting between med applications, for our
immune system to do its job, and then applying the med again, and again.

   And it's important to note, that the most microscopic bit of this "stuff" has
the ability to grow into another "mass", given enough time.  Therefore, meds
that we take ORALLY, that might inhibit or even "kill" this "stuff", would not
be able to reach all of the "bits of stuff" that have penetrated/grown into and
inside our cells.  So DMSO appears to be absolutely necessary, as the
"transport/delivery vehicle", to get the fluconazole where it can do its job
100%.

   DMSO has also been proven to "deposit a reservoir" in the skin where it is
applied, of whatever it "transports" into the skin, so the level of
fluconazole/Diflucan at the site of the topical application of this med is
probably very high and persistant.  Also, the DMSO is no doubt "transporting"
the fluconazole through each or our cell walls, so that even parts of this
"stuff" that have penetrated inside our cells is also "killed".

   This may explain why the strong stinging sometimes occurs, where these most
sensitive nerve receptors exist, (in the face), while there is no sensation on
the toes, and little or no sensation on the back of the hand, with nail fungus
or infestations on the back of the hand, when this med is applied there.

   In any case, it is because the cells of the nerve receptors and nerves have
been "compromised" by this infestation, that this med's "attacking/penetrating"
the infestation may cause the nerve receptors to "fire".  In other words, the
"mechanism" of this stinging or itching, that may occur during the ten minutes
after the application of this med, is not one of "harm being done", but is in
fact simply caused by an "unnatural firing" of the nerve receptors, because they
have been so penetrated and damaged by the growth of this parasitic fungal
"entity", probably for decades of growth.

   And it's important to note that during the first years, (or even decades), of
this growth, we had no symptoms at all.  According to this "Theory of
Mechanism", the symptoms of rosacea, or rhinophyma, or any or these diseases
with a parasitic fungal ROOT CAUSE, are caused by our immune system's
"attacking" our own human cells, which have finally been so "compromised" and
penetrated by this "parasitic mass", that these "damaged cells" cause an "immune
reaction".

   But the underlying ROOT CAUSE of the disease is untouched by any of the
methods used to SUPPRESS/"control" our symptoms.  And even if we "succeed" in
suppressing our symptoms, the ROOT CAUSE continues to get bigger, and bigger,
doing more and more irreversible damage to our skin.
I hope this helps.
God Bless, ITN & IDFN,
Dave Fleming
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Date: June 2006
From:  [email address deleted]
To: "Dave Fleming" <fulltruth40@...>
Subject: the cure
   Dave
Does this really work and what about the cautions that Nase warrants.
Brady seemed to have good results and is toting his diet and other
products after the fact he used the DMSO and fluconozole solution.
Has anyone else been cured of this wretched disease?  I have been
attacked by a fungus and have been batteling it for the last 2 years.
I am going to my doc next week and thought about bringing up this tx.
He will probably want to put me on a dose of flagyl for 10 days to
start but I am very interested in this, any more info would help.  I
have read over the entire context of your site and still have a few
questions, just wondering if your still there?
[name deleted]
   xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
   Date: June 2006
From:  [email address deleted]
To: fulltruth40@...
Subject: DMSO cure
   Dave
I wrote you yesterday and have yet to get a reply.  I have another
question for you.   I was diagnosed 2 years ago with C-Difficile and
shortly after got rosacea, are these two connected?  Do you think I
may have a fungal infection that is growing out of control?  I have
svere rosacea and cant go in the sun without a huge reaction, how can
I go from good skin to shit in a matter of months?  I am going to talk
to my doc about getting this rx filled thursday this week, I was also
going to see if I could go on a short course(10 days) of Flagyl to
knock down the intestinal aspect of this crap.  Am I making the right
choice?  Thank you
[name deleted]
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
   Date: June 2006
To: rosacea-cure@yahoogroups.com
From: [email address deleted]
Subject: accutane DMSO
   I have been taking accutane can I still do the treatment or will my
skin be too much at risk?
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
  Next-gen email? Have it all with the  all-new Yahoo! Mail Beta.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Getting the price down, of this Rx, is no doubt important to a lot of people.  I
recently was led to a method of "price reduction" which radically reduces the
USA price of this Rx, for those folks who need larger quantities of
[(10% water/90% DMSO) + 10% fluconazole + 2% Ibuprofen].
You would simply dilute the 50% med, by adding DMSO and a little Ibuprofen.
   To do this in the USA, one would have to add legally obtained ingredients "at
home", to a legal 50% med Rx that was prepared by a Compounding Pharmacist. 
Since this "Rx modification" might be "technically illegal" to do, perhaps in
some USA states and not in others, I am presenting the following information for
use only where it is legal.  I certainly do not recommend breaking "the law",
even if it means that you can defeat the "vicious lawless profit mongers" who
love to bleed us dry, who are supported by the "legal", soiled FDA, (whose
"Commissioner" no doubt gets his cut of the "Big Pharma" profits, one way or
another).

For extensive, accurate info on DMSO, see:
http://www.dmso.org/
Anyone who does not want to order through a local CP, can obtain the best DMSO
from:
http://www.jacoblab.com
Since [jacoblab.com] does not list 100% DMSO on their website, (only 50% and 30%
DMSO), I think you can obtain the 100% DMSO from them by phoning them your
order.
THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION IS FOR USE ONLY WHERE THESE STEPS ARE LEGAL:
I recently stated that I found three CPs who are charging $277, $115, and $54,
for EXACTLY THE SAME Rx, namely, 15 ml of [(10% water/90% DMSO) + 50%
fluconazole + 2% Ibuprofen].
The CP charging $54 for the 50% med, quoted me a price of $43 for the 10% med,
{i.e. 15 ml of [(10% water/90% DMSO) + 10% fluconazole + 2% Ibuprofen]}.
The CP charging $54 is a thousand miles from me, and quoted me a price of well
over $100 for 500 ml of "Pharmacy Grade" DMSO, (no Rx required), but I looked
around locally, and found a CP near me who said that 16 oz, (i.e. 480 ml) of
"Pharmacy Grade", (i.e. "USP"), DMSO would cost me $88.
   Ibuprofen also requires no Rx, so I asked my local CP to weigh out 5-gram
amounts of dry powder, pure 100% Ibuprofen in little plastic "zip bags", and he
sold me five of these, (i.e. 25 grams), for $25.
   I also just happened to have a 60 ml glass bottle with a glass "eye-dropper",
which was formerly filled with "Stevia Extract" from:
Wisdom Natural Brands
Mesa, AZ 85202
(800) 899-9908
http://www.sweetleaf.com
BTW, I highly recommend this brand of stevia, as the only substitute sweetener
(and health herb) anyone should use, since horrors like aspartame, "sucralose",
"Splenda", etc, have been proven to be pure poison.
   I consider it necessary to use glass containers when dealing with DMSO,
because it is such a good "solvent", that I don't trust anything but glass to
not be "affected" by DMSO.  However, certain plastics must be impervious to
DMSO, because the screw-tops and brushes are plastic, in the glass 15 ml bottles
of DMSO-containing Rx I've received for the last four years.

So, ask your doctor to prescribe perhaps 45 ml or 90 ml of [DMSO + 50%
fluconazole + 2% Ibuprofen].  Also ask your doctor to specify the maximum of
five refills, (and any Rx in the USA is good for one year after it's written). 
This means you won't have to visit your doctor again for a long time.  And you
don't have to get the full 45 or 90 ml on this script; if you wish, you can
specify to the CP to just fill part, such as 15 ml.
   In any case, I now had my Rx, and the 60 ml glass bottle with a glass
"eye-dropper", a 5-gram "zip bag" of Ibuprofen, and DMSO.

(1)  I made a paper funnel by taping a piece of paper as a funnel, and I added
roughly one-half of the dry powder Ibuprofen in one "5-gram zip bag", (i.e. 2.5
grams, or 2,500 mg), into the 60 ml bottle.  Together with the 300 mg, (i.e. 15
ml x 20 mg), of 2% Ibuprofen already in the 15 ml Rx, this gave me 2,800 mg, or
46 mg per ml, or 4.6% Ibuprofen in the final 60 ml of med.
By splitting the 5-grams into four equal parts, you could add only 1,250 mg
Ibuprofen, totaling 1,550 mg in 60 ml, or 26 mg per ml, or 2.6% Ibuprofen.  I
just wanted to try the higher 4.6% of Ibuprofen, which seemed to work OK,
although probably not any better than the 2% Ibuprofen, as far as I could tell.

(2)  Then I poured one 15 ml bottle of [DMSO + 50% fluconazole + 2% Ibuprofen]
Rx into the 60 ml bottle.

(3)  Then I added 6 milliliters, (i.e. 10% of 60 ml), of "steam distilled water"
from a gallon I bought at a local store.  To measure this, I had to buy a cheap
plastic syringe from a pharmacy, which is graduated up to 10 ml and up to two
"teaspoons", and is normally used to measure liquid medications.

(4)  Then I filled the 60 ml bottle to the top by adding about 45 ml of DMSO.

   This gave me 60 ml of [(10% water/90% DMSO) + 12.5% fluconazole + 4.6%
Ibuprofen], at a cost of about $65.  If I had bought this at the best price from
a CP, it would have cost much more, on the order of at least $200 to $400+.

   I'm currently trying to find out where I can buy a larger glass container,
(graduated in ml), so that I can "modify" a total of 75 ml at a time, (from each
15 ml of 50% med), which would give me more med, with 10% fluconazole instead of
12.5% fluconazole.

   So, four of the 15 ml bottles of 50% med can be "converted" into 300 ml of 10%
med.  This will mean that 300 ml of the "home modified" 10% fluconazole med will
cost me about $268, instead of the $860 to $2,040 I would pay CPs for 300 ml of
10% med.

   During about 40 days, I used over 240 ml of the 12.5% med, (at a cost of about
$256), on my entire scalp, neck, and ears, and have had very good results in
getting rid of an amazing amount of "infestation", (probable diagnosis is
"ringworm", which is a fungal disease having nothing to do with "worms").  I was
not even aware that I had so much of this infestation, until I could afford to
apply this med in this larger quantity.

Initially, I was surprised that the back of my neck was stinging a little when I
applied the med, where I have "acne scars", and I still occasionally have what I
thought was "minor cystic acne".  But this so-called "cystic acne", (which just
"happened" to be where barbers had shaved me, for decades) has obviously been
caused by some sort of "fungal infestation", finally curable with this med.

   The first time I applied this med all over my scalp, (probably about 5 ml or
more), it stung some, but not too much.  A day later, I used my fingernails, to
"stir up" all the extensive "dead skin" that was all over my scalp.  Then, when
I applied the med the second time, this "rough scalp" held the liquid med
better, and the stinging was so intense, that I literally could not "sit still".
I had to keep walking around, just to try to "deal with the stinging".  I
applied the med multiple times.  During later med applications, when there
wasn't much stinging, I found that the stinging was more intense, if I applied
pressure to the scalp with my whole (plastic-glove covered) hand.  And I applied
the med on most days, during the next three weeks to 40 days.

   In "spreading the med around" on my scalp, I got the med on my ears.  A couple
of days later, I found that even my ears "reacted" a little, becoming a little
"plump", pink, and peeling a little skin after a couple of days.  After that, I
put the med all over my ears, as well, which proved to me that they were indeed
also "involved" with this "infestation".  When some of the med ran down onto the
top of my back, I found that there was a slight "reaction" even there, with some
minor skin peeling later.

After about two weeks of med applications, I got a very short haircut, so that
I'd use less med, which was being partially kept away from the scalp by the
hair.
It will probably take another two or three months, to cure this scalp problem
completely, since I think I need to wait for a couple of weeks, between multiple
med applications, to give the scalp time to "grow new healthy skin".  Upon
liberal application of the med, about ten "lesions" became apparent on my scalp,
(which were soft/spongy, scab-covered bumps, from one-fourth to one-half inch in
diameter, and sore to the touch).   They were almost all at the back of the
crown of the scalp, and there were two on each side of the head, on the scalp
behind the ears.

   I believe these "lesions" are the "root areas", where this infestation "got
its start".  These "lesions" take time, (perhaps a couple of weeks or even two
months), to "grow back some healthy skin", after multiple med applications.  So
this cure does demand patience and persistence.  When I scratched the scabs off
these "bumps", they would bleed some, and I used tissues to stop the bleeding,
before applying and rubbing in more med.  I don't recommend this "picking at the
scabs", but I'm rather overly aggressive, about killing this stuff.

   After about 50 days, these "bumps" finally became flat, and they were no
longer "sore" to the touch, and I could occasionally feel a "healing itch" from
the whole area I'd treated.  It felt good to massage and even lightly scratch
this whole area, at that time.

   BTW, I was dripping the med onto my scalp from an "eye-dropper", and spreading
it around with my left-hand fingertips.  But my fingertips began to look like
bleached-white prunes, so I had to use a "plastic glove" I made myself.  Using
any plastic bag such as the grocery stores put your groceries in, I used a
rubber band at my wrist, to keep the bag in place.  Make sure that you do not
put any ink, (i.e. printing), from the bag onto your skin, because the DMSO will
no doubt carry the ink into your scalp with even perhaps 10% going into your
bloodstream.  Although this might not cause permanent harm, we no doubt do not
need ink molecules in our skin and bloodstream.

   Also make sure that the bag you use has no small holes in it, (ideally), and
even one bag can be used for this purpose many times, before you might throw it
away and use another one.  It's interesting to note that latex and even vinyl
gloves might not work for this purpose, because DMSO might dissolve them.  But
the thin plastic used to make those grocery bags, (polypropylene???), seems to
be perfect for the job.
I also was able to use one of these bags on my head at night, to keep the med
off my bed sheets.  I just cut it down the middle of one side, and I tied the
handles at the back of my head.

   With the abundance of this cheaper med, I also treated the inside of my nose,
in a new way.  I was surprised to find that I was able to voluntarily keep the
"nasal passage(s)" to my throat closed, when I dripped the liquid med into my
nose from an eye-dropper, while lying on a bed and hanging my head backwards
over the side of the bed, to keep the nasal passage(s), completely upside down.

At the first application of about one ml, into my right nostril, it was so
painful that I almost gagged, and I could not keep myself from coughing a little
bit.  But the med stayed in my nose, even though "secretions" finally made the
nose "overflow", after a few minutes.  My mistake, was that I performed this
treatment late at night, and I found that the inside of my nasal passages became
swollen, which blocked my breathing about 90%.  This, combined with my "post
nasal drip", made sleeping almost impossible, that night.

   A few days later, I treated the right nostril with about one-and-a-half ml of
the med, with about one-half ml in the left nostril.  The pain was surprisingly
much less, there was no swelling this time, and I felt that I could feel the med
actually causing some "bubbling release", from the sinus area somewhere in the
middle of my face.  I was obviously reaching areas with the med that I'd not
reached before.

   A couple of weeks later, the "post nasal drip" that was so persistent is much
reduced, and the inside of my nose is obviously being healed, far up into the
nasal passages where I could never effectively apply the med before.  For a
couple of days, it felt, (and sounded), almost like I had the kind of "light
sinus congestion" you get with a cold, but I know that it was actually a stage
of healing of this nasal treatment/cure.

I am very happy with these results!  Not only can I see the light at the end of
this "nasal-cure tunnel", but it also looks like the sun is at high noon, at the
end of this tunnel!

So, what have I cured on myself?
(1)  very extensive case of nail fungus on both big toes, and minor fungus in my
left thumbnail
(2)  stealthy, extensive/deep "infestation" on the back of my left hand
(3)  rosacea on both cheeks and beginning rhinophyma on my nose
(4)  athlete's foot, (including occasional bleeding cracks between toes and
decades-long reoccurring pus-filled "fungal blisters") on both feet
(5)  one obvious "liver spot", (i.e. tinea versicolor), on my left forearm
(6)  three or four "non-descript spots/areas", on my left forearm
(7)  stealthy "infestation" on the back of my right hand, (very different from
what was on my left hand)
(8)  "chronic low-level inflammation" of a spot at the top of my "butt crack",
(sorry, I don't know the scientific name for this spot, other than "adjacent to
coxis bone at bottom of spine") --- I had to have serious surgery to "lance a
boil" at this spot in 1976
(9)  probable cure of a probable "infestation" of my vocal cords, which hindered
my singing since about 1989
(10)  possible cure of possible "internal infestation" inside my upper right arm
muscle, (possibly caused/introduced decades ago by past hypodermic needle
injection)
(11)  "infestations" inside both outer ears, which manifested occasionally for
decades, like painful "internal boils", especially when I was under stress
(12)  Most importantly, I have probably cured other "infestations" in my body,
without even knowing I had them or cured them.
On Going Cures With End In Sight:
(A)  nasal and sinus "infestations"
(B)  whole scalp, ears, neck and forehead very extensive "stealthy infestation",
(possibly "ringworm"???)

   It's fantastic, to see the completion of my multiple-cures with this
revolutionary med, looming in the next few months!  Wow!

   It appears likely to me, that the type of scalp infestation I've had may have
come from one or more of the dozens, (perhaps hundreds???), of public barbers I
went to, over many decades.  I might add that I've now bought a Remington "home
haircut" kit, (with a little built-in vacuum), and have used it one time very
effectively.  I think I'll continue to use it, (and avoid public barbers), since
anything short of a medical autoclave, (i.e. intense steam heat disinfection),
of steel combs and clipper blades, would never kill this fungus.  Even the
pretty "blue alcohol" dips that some barbers put their plastic combs into, would
in my opinion never prevent the spreading of this type of fungal infestation,
especially since they do not "treat/soak" their clipper blades after each use.

   Because of HIV-AIDS, laws have been passed to forbid any shaving by barbers,
with anything other than a fresh razor blade, to be used only once.  Now, it
seems we also need to pass laws requiring steel combs, scissors, and clipper
blades that are autoclaved after each use, to prevent this type of insidious
fungal disease from being spread by barbers.

   But since this type of "fungal infestation" is so stealthy and impossible to
detect, even for years after you "get it", (and constant autoclaving is not
cheap, to do), such laws may be almost impossible to get passed.

   Oh well....  As some kids used to say, when I was in 7th grade, "There's a
fungus among us".
   I hope this helps.
God Bless, ITN & IDFN,
Dave Fleming


---------------------------------
New Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Call regular phones from your PC and save big.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

For Everyone,
Here is just a "newsy" compilation of info and advice I recently sent to a
[rosacea-cure] newcomer.
I wish the news of this cure had already reached the estimated 200,000,000
rosaceans, worldwide, (and the probable BILLIONS of those with other "incurable"
diseases that are now curable with this med), but no such luck.
But the truth will out.
I ask everyone to please use all possible means to "spread the word" of this
treatment/cure.
As usual, my DISCLAIMER here, is that any of the "Theories Of Mechanism" I
"surmise/guess" MIGHT be incorrect, but the fact that this med is curing a long
list of previously incurable diseases is unmistakably valid, even if it is based
mostly on "anecdotal evidence" at this time.
There is some "ongoing news" in this post, for those of you with the time to
read it, but nothing Earth-shaking.
And BTW, all meds mentioned in the following email also contain the 2%
Ibuprofen, (i.e. 20 mg/ml), although I am very sure that this med works with or
without that ingredient.  It MAY work a bit better with the 2% Ibuprofen.
I hope this helps.
God Bless, ITN & IDFN,
Dave Fleming --- PRIVATE EMAIL FOLLOWS, in reverse chronological order ------

   Dave Fleming wrote:
Hi, [name deleted],
It's obviously impossible for me to answer your questions with any real
authority, since I do not know your "medical condition", and in any case, I am
not an MD.  Working with your doctor/MD on this is best, since this is not an
"overnight" treatment/cure.
But I will make this 4-part claim to you:

(1)  From all evidence I can find, this disease is "progressive", which means
that it is doing more and more "stealthy damage", the longer we wait before
"doing anything to cure it".  And although it is very slow growing, (and the
SYMPTOMS may seem to "come and go"), it is doing constant irreversible damage
that is not immediately evident.  This already inflicted "skin damage" is shown
up, (i.e. made evident), by the application(s) of this treatment/cure, finally
resulting in disease-free, (but not always undamaged), skin.  On the positive
side, there are all kinds of "cosmetic medical treatments" that will reduce or
remove whatever rosacea damage has occurred, (including any "residual,
NON-DISEASED pinkness"), AFTER the skin is no longer diseased.
But it's disastrous to apply such "cosmetic" laser/IPL, electric cautery needle,
and other so-called "rosacea treatments", (i.e. SUPPRESSION/CONTROL of symptoms
ONLY), BEFORE the disease is cured by [DMSO + 10% fluconazole] or by [(10%
water/90% DMSO) + 10% fluconazole], because the ROOT CAUSE of the disease simply
continues to grow larger and do more irreversible damage.

(2)  Since this med has virtually no effect on healthy skin, there is no harm in
using this med to "attack" this disease.
In fact, "rosacea" is not really one disease, but basically a "catch-all" term
used by "white-coats", to name "something" for which they simply do not know the
"ROOT CAUSE".  And this med cures many "forms" of this "stuff", (and I believe
it cures ALL forms, with some taking longer than others), so it will either cure
you, or have no effect on your "problem".  In one case, that of seborrheic
dermatitis, (SD), reports I've received state that this med alleviates the SD
symptoms very well, temporarily, with optimum effectiveness over any other SD
"treatment" method.

   (3)  The revolutionary, astoundingly likely "Theory", that these stealthy,
parasitic, fungal "entities" are secreting undetected mycotoxins into our
bodies, (for decades), which MIGHT be causing any number of the diseases that
are called "idiopathic", (i.e. diseases with unknown causes), such as Multiple
Sclerosis, Rheumatoid Arthritis, chronic fatigue syndrome, and even certain
types of cancer, (etc, etc, etc), should convince us to use this cure, to get
rid of these "chronic infestations/mycotoxins".  We first eat our food, and then
we digest it.  But fungi, [fun-ji], first digest their food, (with mycotoxins),
and then they eat/absorb it.  So although the site(s) of the actual
"infestation(s)" may be limited, the mycotoxins naturally go throughout our
body, as these "infestations" are actually "pre-digesting" our whole body.  It
is quite logical that especially our immune system might be radically
affected/damaged by decades of the presence of these (probably undetectable)
  mycotoxins, which MIGHT be causing some of these idiopathic diseases.
Here is a list of little-understood autoimmune, (or autoimmune-related)
disorders:
Addison's disease,
dermatomyositis,
dermatomyositis,
diabetes,
Graves disease,
Hashimoto's thyroiditis,
lupus erythematosus,
multiple sclerosis,
myasthenia gravis,
pernicious anemia,
Reiter's syndrome,
rheumatoid arthritis,
Sjogren's syndrome,
systemic lupus erythematosus.
I spoke of this general concept, of idiopathic diseases that may be caused by
the cascade effects of "chronic mycotoxins", at:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/272

   (4)  Putting (1), (2), and (3) together, my claim to you is that you really
have no choice but to try this [DMSO + fluconazole] med, because it is the only
cure for this "stuff" in existence, and waiting only guarantees you more
irreversible damage to your skin.   The fact that this med only "heals/attacks"
diseased skin is a self-fulfilling, retroactive clarification, concerning
whether you "needed" this cure or not.  No doctor's pre-diagnosis can make this
any clearer.  As an aside, I have read that far more men than women cases of
Rhinophyma, (a "final form" of rosacea), are "recorded".  And I believe,
(without much proof), that this is because more women commit suicide early in
the disease, and therefore never become "recorded" cases.  If you find photos of
"terminal" Rhinophyma on the Internet, you might agree with me, or at least
wonder why in the world such a horrendous, disfiguring disease would be "gender
specific".

   This should now be a very cheap Rx, (even in the USA), because there is no
longer any patent on Diflucan/fluconazole, and DiMethylSulfOxide, (DMSO), is
also relatively cheap.  Currently in the USA, there is much overcharging for
this Rx, so you have to search nationwide for the Compounding Pharmacists,
(CPs), that keep a large supply, (i.e. over a kilogram), of fluconazole in
stock, which RADICALLY reduces the price of this Rx, since the CPs pay TEN TIMES
as much, (per mg), unless they buy a full kilogram of fluconazole for about
$700.00.  Unless they use it, they are then forced to later throw it away, by
imposed, unproven, legally required "expiration dates", which appear to vary
from state to state, although the FDA has its own "vague expiration date
standards", which can be (and are) enforced at gunpoint.

   Since CPs also fill a lot of veterinary Rx's, (that contain fluconazole), CPs
in the Southern USA may more likely stock fluconazole by the kilogram, since
they may serve ranchers.
Three CPs I checked recently are charging $277.00, $115.00, and $54.00, FOR
EXACTLY THE SAME Rx, {i.e. 15 ml of [(10% water/90% DMSO) + 50%
fluconazole]}!!!!!!!!!!  Of course, the 10% med should be cheaper, since the
fluconazole is the most expensive ingredient in the USA; the CP charging $54 for
the 50% med, quoted a $43 price for the 10% med, which seems appropriate, since
they are charging for their service, rather than socking it to you for the
fluconazole content.

   Since you can get your Rx from anywhere in the USA by faxing them your Rx, it
pays to search around for the "right" CP, by using different zip codes, at:
http://www.iacprx.org/referral_service/header.htm
[This URL now sends you to an "error message Page", BUT THERE'S NO "error". 
Just click there for "find a pharmacist", and you'll probably have to "log in",
giving a name, email address, and zip code --- I recently found it difficult to
copy and paste there, with a very long delay for each "Web Page" of five
pharmacists.   SO I TYPED THE PHONE NUMBERS OF HUNDREDS OF PHARMACIES ON MY OWN
DOCUMENT.  YOU CAN DO THE SAME.  Such are the woes of those who battle "Big
Pharma".]
My theory on this, is that "Big Pharma" has found ways to deviously "attack"
this "IACP CP-referral service for patients", (possibly because of [DMSO +
fluconazole], believe it or not), so the IACP has been forced to tighten up
their "security measures".  Such a theory may seem "paranoid", but if this
cheap, topically applied med proves to cure the BILLIONS of people I believe it
may, then the whole medical field would undergo radical changes, (putting at the
very least, most IPL/laser "treatment" folks out of business), and at least
parts of "Big Pharma" would indeed attempt to prevent such changes/cures.
   Locating a "reasonably-priced-Rx CP" can be a huge headache, requiring perhaps
hours of long-distance phone calls, (talking to CPs), but that's the name of the
game in the corrupt "Big Pharma System" we contend with in the USA.  To make
your phone calls short, you might just ask them whether they stock fluconazole
by the kilogram, rather than trying to explain your Rx.  My rather p'd-off
opinion, is that there are now USA CPs who are actually "passively cooperating"
in a "conspiracy" to "bury" this cure, by radically overcharging for this Rx,
(and being somehow rewarded by "Big Pharma", for doing so).

   I wish there were a better cure, but there isn't.  After over four years, I'm
still faithfully "treating"/curing the INSIDE of my nose, (which MAY be related
to the rhinophyma I already cured in the skin of my nose), because I can see
that my long, drawn-out, difficult process is indeed very slooooowly curing this
"nasty stuff".
I can think of four possible reasons for this cure delay:

(1)  When I treated the "resistant" infestation on the back of my left hand,
(starting in Nov. 2001), I many times applied the 1% med several times a day,
(and certainly twice a day), for many weeks, to the 3 x 5 inch, 15 sq. inch
area.  (The "healing itch" from this infestation was so intense, that I at one
point had to apply an OTC "Max anti-itch cream" at night, in order to get any
sleep.)  This "type" of infestation had no stinging, but the med changed the
infested skin into a very thick, translucent, whitish area, with a strange,
roughly "target shaped" area of "alligator skin". Three years later, I found
that I had to apply the 10% med, (which I did not have earlier), to this area,
to "clean up" some extremely minor "infestation" that was still on my hand
there.  The area inside my nose has been simply too much of a hassle to
"treat/cure", because applying the med causes it to sting, (sometimes with a
sharp aching feeling extending up into the area around my left eye), and
  causes my eyes to water, and even sometimes causes me to sneeze six or seven
times.  So I only applied the med perhaps a few times in one month, (which
radically decreased the "stuffed up, sleep apnea nasal symptoms"), followed by
many months when I applied no med.  I am sure that if I'd been more regular,
aggressive, and effective in the nasal med applications, this "infestation"
would have long ago been gone/cured.

(2)  My take on this is that the cartilage inside my nose has almost no "blood
supply", and since the "process" of this cure seems to require "action" by our
(blood supply's) immune system to "clean up" the "dead parasitic entity" left by
the med, that may be one cause for the delay of TOTAL cure, inside my nose.

(3)  Also, applying the water-thin med inside my nose has not been as effective,
because the "secretions" inside the nose appear to "wash the med away", before
it can be absorbed completely.

(4)  And there is one other possibility, which would be that this "internal
nasal infestation" originated far below, from a dental "root canal" of one of my
teeth, (or even from my left ear, which has a perforated eardrum from childhood
"ear-aches"), so I might have to increase the systemic [DMSO + fluconazole] in
my bloodstream repeatedly, to "reach it all", and completely knock it out.

That's why I've been "experimenting" with the maximum concentration and amount
of the [(10% water/90% DMSO) + 50% fluconazole], inside my nose.  Although it
presumably causes a higher systemic [DMSO + fluconazole] level, (especially
since I swallow whatever med is not absorbed inside my nose), this highest
concentration is most likely not appropriate for the "normal infestations" on
our skin, since it leaves a heavy white residue, (which is obviously wasted,
unabsorbed fluconazole), on the skin, and it seems to be less "effective" than
the [(10% water/90% DMSO) + 10% fluconazole], judging by the lesser amount of
stinging or itching or change in appearance caused by the application of the 50%
med.

   There is some obvious proof, even in my case alone, that this so-called
rosacea "disease" is most likely caused by some sort of "stealthy" parasitic,
fungal "entities"; and there appear to be more than one "type" of these
"entities", with some being more easily and quickly cured by this med than
others.  One "Internet rosacea-Judas BB profiteer" loves to "muddy the water" by
listing all the names of diseases that "look like" rosacea.  But just one
application of this med proves whether this med will cure you, (i.e. by
"appearance changes" or stinging or itching), no matter what the white-coats
"name" your disease.
And so, the "white coats" can only "treat/SUPPRESS/control" the rosacea
SYMPTOMS, which is really disastrous, even if they "succeed", because that
allows the underlying ROOT CAUSE of the disease to continue to progress, doing
more and more "stealthy damage", which cannot be reversed, later.

   My present belief, is that using the [(10% water/90% DMSO) + 10% fluconazole]
is more effective than using the [DMSO + 10% fluconazole].  Both of these have
also contained 2% Ibuprofen, (i.e. 20 mg/ml), for my use, although I'm still not
sure whether this ingredient matters much for this cure.
I believe that SOME of these "entities" are curable with the more deeply
penetrating 10% water med, that may not be completely, 100% curable with the
[DMSO + 10% fluconazole].  I recommend that you ask your doctor to prescribe
both for you, and see which one you "prefer", (which will probably take months
to determine).  I also recommend the 2% Ibuprofen content, since that's what
I've used.
   I guess we could write these as:
[DMSO + 10% fluconazole + 2% Ibuprofen],
and
[(10% water/90% DMSO) + 10% fluconazole + 2% Ibuprofen]
(And that means 100 mg fluconazole per ml, and 20 mg Ibuprofen per ml of med.)

YOUR DOCTOR/MD/GP SHOULD INCLUDE THE INFO OF THESE THREE INGREDIENTS ON YOUR Rx
SCRIPT, TO AVOID ANY POSSIBLE CONFUSION.  AND THE "BULK, PURE" POWDER
FLUCONAZOLE IS WHAT THE CP SHOULD USE, IDEALLY, SINCE TABLETS OR CAPSULES
CONTAIN "EXCIPIENT" INGREDIENTS, (SUCH AS RED DYE #40 IN THE TABLETS), THAT MAY
DISSOLVE IN THE DMSO AND BE "TRANSPORTED" INTO YOUR SKIN, ALTHOUGH THIS WOULD
MOST LIKELY HAVE NO HARMFUL EFFECTS, ESPECIALLY IN SUCH SMALL QUANTITIES.

(And BTW, "DMSO" is "100% DMSO", but is normally labeled "99% DMSO", because
DMSO normally absorbs a bit of water from the humidity in the air.)
The more effective/penetrating (10% water/90% DMSO) med MAY cause more or longer
lasting "temporary appearance problems".

Makeup is indeed needed, but since the skin can be "raw", most types of makeup
are probably not appropriate.  As a male, I have found that the "Reviva"
soothing creme and a "hypo-allergenic concealer", (which comes in a glass tube
"bottle" with a brush inside), are most likely best, even though they may not
cover every problem totally.
Here is a quote from r-c message #187:

   XOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOX
I used a "concealer". The best concealer I know of now, is:
[ALMAY (hypo-allergenic) Skin Smoothing Concealer, with Kinetin],
which I think I saw at a Walgreen's Store.
   In order to "blend in" the peeling skin, which can be unsightly, I
highly recommend an "anti-inflammatory", "anti-wrinkle" cream, the
ingredients of which are recommended by Dr. Perricone. It is called:
   Reviva Labs: Alpha-Lipoic-Acid-Vitamin-C-Ester-&-DMAE Cream
This is under $20.00, available only from the Vitamin Shoppe chain
of stores, to my knowledge. These stores are in only 18 states,
but they sell through the web, at:
vitaminshoppe.com
and also through a toll-free phone number, at:
1-800-223-1216
This "anti-inflammatory", "anti-wrinkle" cream says on the label to
use it at "night time", but I believe a small amount should also
be used in the morning, to help "blend in" whatever peeling skin
may occur, so that it does not show, during the day. "Concealer"
makeup goes on well, over this face cream.
   XOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOX

   I mention this at:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/210
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/204
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/187

AND REMEMBER THAT ANY MAKEUP ON YOUR SKIN SHOULD MOST LIKELY BE WASHED OFF,
BEFORE ANY APPLICATION OF THE MED, BECAUSE THE DMSO HAS THE ABILITY TO
"TRANSPORT" MOST ANYTHING ON YOUR SKIN, DEEPLY INTO THE SKIN, WITH 10% OF IT
EVEN BEING "TRANSPORTED" INTO YOUR BLOODSTREAM.

Although I don't believe that this "transdermal transport/absorption" of
cosmetic ingredients, (which are incredibly numerous), would cause any permanent
harm, it certainly seems that it MIGHT cause some "unwanted", or "unpredictable"
effects.
   In any case, if the skin is "raw", such washing, (before applying the med),
can be irritating to the skin.  Therefore, although we "need" makeup, we would
no doubt be happier if we could "go on vacation" and become a hermit for several
months, while we accomplish this cure.   The "Directions" to cure nail fungus
with this med, are to "apply twice daily", for about six weeks.  As a hermit, we
might follow those "Directions" on our face, (and temporarily look like Hell),
but normally, we can apply it once a week, or once a month, and accomplish this
cure over a longer time period.

   In fact, your face may NEVER "peel", depending on the "degree" of your
disease.  I had more of a "sort of peeling" on the severe beginning rhinophyma
on my nose.  You might experience more like a "dry flaking", [DON'T PICK AT
IT!!!], which is easily concealed/blended by the Reviva creme alone, although
the pinkness also requires the "concealer makeup".

BTW, I have never investigated to find out who makes the Reviva brand; I just
discovered it and used it myself, so I have no interest in "promoting" it,
although it appeared to me that sales of this "creme" increased quite a bit
after I first recommended it.  I was led to value its ingredients partially by
the recommendations of Dr. Perricone, MD, but I found his products to be a bit
expensive for me.

   Of course, the second application of the med normally causes "less" appearance
problems than the first, and so on, and so on.  But it is anyone's guess, as to
how many monthly applications you might need, before there is "no effect/change"
when you apply the med.  But that is the realistic goal, to reach that time when
the application of the med causes little or no stinging or itching, and no "dry
flaking or peeling or pinkness".  In other words, you reach the time when the
previously rosaceous skin is unaffected by the med, just like any other healthy
skin on your body.

   And so, [name deleted], my claim to you is that your prayers for a cure have
been answered.  Now, without appearing to be "greedy" to God, perhaps we can
pray for a "perfect cure", that is quick, easy, and reverses all the damage done
by this/these disease(s).  Perhaps God's answer will be that this [DMSO + 10%
fluconazole] cure will be fine, if it is applied very early on, before this
disease causes a lot of "stealthy damage".  Perhaps even ten year olds or
younger would benefit from applying this med one time, (with their doctor's
advice and consent), to see if there is any "change in appearance" or stinging
or itching caused in the skin, which would show the presence, (and very early
curing "process"), of this "type" of disease.

   My present belief, is that this "stuff" may be growing in our skin for twenty
years, before "symptoms" appear, because no one younger than 16 years old has
ever been diagnosed with rosacea.  My "Theory of Mechanism", is that this
"parasitic entity" masks itself from our immune system, during that first 15, or
20, or 30+? years, so "inflammatory (rosacea) symptoms" do not appear until
enough damage has been done to our own human cells, which then causes our immune
system to "attack" our own damaged cells, which manifests as the "rosacea
symptoms".
There is clear proof that these "fungal entities" grow by simply
growing/sprouting new "pointed branches", (called hyphae, [hi-fee]), and these
"pointed branches" have the force to grow right through human cells.  I haven't
been able to "pin it down", but the size difference may be something like
needle-sized "hyphae" piercing our basketball-sized "human skin cells".
   So even this physical damage alone would obviously cause our immune system to
seek to "clean up" and remove such "pierced human cells"; but this could never
cure the disease.  To do that, the [DMSO + fluconazole] can invade not only our
bloodstream, but actually pass inside each of our cells which is infested by
this/these disease(s) as explained at:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/193

   There is a "parallel observation", in the fungus that we see on a fruit, such
as an apple or an orange.  If one cuts away the "visible fungus damage", leaving
what appears to be the "completely normal looking part" of the fruit, one can
get a very unpleasant surprise when that "normal looking" part is eaten, because
our taste buds can taste the "invisible damage" done by the fungus, before
enough "damage" has been done to cause "visible fungal symptoms" to appear.
Recently, a thought occurred to me that animals such as horses, and "pets" such
as dogs and cats may give us these diseases without our realizing it, because
their life spans are short enough that these slow-growing "parasitic fungal
entities" never have the time to fully "mature", so that the "animal's symptoms"
never have a chance to appear, or they may appear on a very old, (i.e. 16 year
old), animal, but go unnoticed under the fur, or be "written off" as a "disease
of old age".

   Well, I intended this letter to you to be short, but it "got away from me".
On top of all this, I want to say that it is well worth your time, (even though
I admit it's a long read), to read all 28 of the messages on the [rosacea-cure]
board that I've posted on the Home Page.  THE REASON I CLAIM THAT THIS READING
IS WORTH YOUR TIME, IS THAT THIS IS THE ONLY CURE FOR THIS/THESE DISEASE(S) IN
EXISTENCE, IN MY HUMBLE OPINION.
Posted on the Home Page, are:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/2
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/18
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/64
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/210
etc, etc, etc ------->
Most important, are messages #2, #18, #64, #170, #210, #261, #264, and #272.
Also important, are messages #163, #187 thru #193, #197 thru #207, and #263.
   So, I hope this helps.
God Bless, ITN & IDFN,
Dave Fleming
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 03:29:22 -0000
From:  [name deleted]
To: "Dave Fleming" <fulltruth40@...>
Subject: Re: need help with my rosacea

   i read that it takes about 2 weeks for the peeling to finish.  I work in the
public everyday.  Can you wear make-up over you face while you are using the
treatment?  Does your face peel everytime you apply the treatment once a month?
YOU can also email me at [email address deleted].
I have suffered for many years. I have prayed for a cure.
Sincerely,
[name deleted]


---------------------------------
Relax. Yahoo! Mail virus scanning helps detect nasty viruses!

---------------------------------
Yahoo! Mail
Bring photos to life! New PhotoMail  makes sharing a breeze.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

For Everyone,
As my mom used to say, "Children and bears should never see half-done work".  So
if you are immature, or if you are grumpy and/or predatory, please do not read
this post, because it is an attempt to clarify even less than half-done
"conclusions".  :-)
Of course, this post talks about curing ocular rosacea and rhinophyma, (although
I'm still not certain this "infestation" inside my nose is connected to the
rhinophyma I had), so it would seem that many rosaceans might not be interested
in this.  However, there is the fact that no one to my knowledge has used this
40% to 50% med yet, [with a more penetrating base of (10% water/90% DMSO)], to
cure facial rosacea, and it MIGHT be much more effective/faster for that than
the [DMSO + 10% fluconazole] med has been.
We won't know for sure until rosaceans use it in great numbers, and publicly
post their results, along with their doctors' positive statements.

My only cautionary note, is that curing rosacea faster may make us look worse
temporarily.  Also, I have come to the opinion that "healing effects", (i.e.
dryness, and almost microscopic bumps of dead skin - "DON'T PICK AT THEM!"), can
manifest IN A VERY MINOR WAY, for even longer than three or four months after
the last facial application of [(10% water/90% DMSO) + 10% fluconazole].  This
is perhaps three times longer than my experienced effects with [DMSO + 10%
fluconazole].

So, my GUESS is that a 10% water base and higher concentrations of fluconazole,
such as [(10% water/90% DMSO) + 45% fluconazole], might cure facial rosacea more
quickly, but MIGHT make us look worse temporarily than the weaker
concentrations, without the 10% water.  Presumably, this would be because this
10% water med penetrates much deeper into the skin, and "kills" more
effectively, with that "dead skin" being shed for a longer time period by
healthy skin growing from underneath.

   So, as I've said before, sooth the skin with "something good", between med
applications, and use "concealer makeup" when necessary, as at:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/210
As I've also said, it would be nice if we could take a two to six month vacation
for this cure, (if we could afford it, ha, ha), and perhaps apply this med on
our facial rosacea twice a day for six weeks, as is appropriate on nail fungus. 
None of our friends would see us "healing", and we therefore wouldn't need any
makeup at all.  :-)

   BTW, it has become clear to me recently that different USA states have
completely different "rules" for CPs to follow, so some clarification will be
good here.  All the Rx(s) that I've used have always contained 2% Ibuprofen,
(i.e. 20 mg Ibuprofen per ml), as listed at:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/170
(There is confusion there, too, because my CP only recently clarified that he
used 2% Ibuprofen, (and NOT the 0.2% that he clearly and repeatedly told me,
back in Sept. 2003.)

I considered this the "commonly accepted" formula for this Rx, but I recently
found out that some USA states require the doctor to list this, (i.e. all),
ingredient(s) on the Rx script.  According to my CP, this minor Ibuprofen
content is added to ENHANCE THE ABSORPTION of the med into the skin, as I stated
at:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/64
I have never asked him for the clinical proof for this use of Ibuprofen,
dissolved in DMSO.  In any case, I've always suspected that this Ibuprofen
content was NOT NEEDED, but I never wanted to change the "formula" of this Rx,
because the bottom line is that no one knows exactly how/why it is working, to
cure rosacea and many other incurable diseases.

At this time, I would like to say that I WILL BE TRYING THIS MED IN THE FUTURE
WITHOUT THE IBUPROFEN CONTENT.  Since I don't think this Ibuprofen content
matters, one way or the other, this is most likely an unimportant, moot point. 
But I just wanted to clarify this, and apologize for any confusion I've allowed
on this point. If I notice any differences in effects, I'll be sure to post that
here on the [rosacea-cure] board.
God Bless, ITN & IDFN,
Dave Fleming --- PERSONAL EMAILS FOLLOW, (in reverse chronological order) ----

Date: Jan. 22, 2006
Dave Fleming wrote:
Hi, [name deleted],
Am very sorry for my delay in answering you, [name deleted], but I am "snowed
under" at times by my schedule.
I want to assure you that all the "healing effects" you have described are
pretty much exactly what I experienced, (except I sometimes used a swear-word,
describing the intensity of the "15 -17 minutes" of stinging), so I encourage
you to continue med applications, being patient and persistent.  And tell your
doctor to examine and approve the "Directions" for you, at:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/210

   Please believe me, I am simply being truthful and I'm not profiting from this
situation in any way.  I am gaining only the satisfaction of knowing that I am
helping to promote the only cure in existence for this "diabolical stuff", (most
likely parasitical fungal infestations).
I am making no profit from this, but helping mankind with this truth is in fact
a great spiritual benefit for me, (and I do want to thank Yahoo! for not having
deleted this free [rosacea-cure] board, to date).  But the "healing effects" of
this treatment/cure can be a hassle, and do take time, so this cure is indeed a
"hard sell".

   As you state below, you are perceptive enough to recognize some of the "horse
shxt" concerning this matter, even when it comes from a Compounding Pharmacist,
(CP).  And I have other "horse shxt" issues with our USA situation:
   (1)  In my opinion, not just USA doctors, but even some USA CPs sometimes
resist filling a DMSO Rx because DMSO is still a bit "mysterious", and they fear
being "at lawsuit risk", (e.g. if you somehow mixed your DMSO Rx with a
pesticide, and it therefore went into your bloodstream --- FAT CHANCE!!!).   And
"Big Pharma" also promotes disinformation to those ignorant USA doctors and CPs
who may then believe that "DMSO causes eye damage", or that DMSO is "too strong"
to use on the face.

   (2)  Some USA CPs are prone to commit the same outrageous over-charging
"policies" that USA Big Pharma gets away with.  Even though fluconazole is now,
"out of patent" and "dirt-cheap", worldwide, its price is being blatantly
manipulated, in the USA.  Furthermore, companies like Spectrum and Hawkins, who
supply USA CPs with the bulk, pure white powder fluconazole, (without the
"excipients" of capsules or tablets), are now hiding their prices from public
view, by requiring a "log in" on their websites.  Even a few months ago, this
was not the case, but "Big Pharma" has found a way to "bury" this [DMSO +
fluconazole] cure, by inflating its price hopelessly, and many, (but not all),
USA CPs are greedily "cooperating" with this God-forsaken ploy.  Furthermore,
these companies "structure" their prices deceptively, so that they sell 25 grams
of "bulk" fluconazole for about TEN TIMES the price, (per gram), that they
charge for a kilogram of fluconazole.  And the FDA and state governments
  further conspire, and impose an "expiration date", (of perhaps six months), on
whatever the CP buys.  This "expiration date" is arbitrary, and completely
unrelated to the actual time-period of potency of the fluconazole, which is most
likely several years or longer, especially if it's kept refrigerated.

   (3)  As best I can determine, USA CPs have stopped recommending the [DMSO + 1%
fluconazole] for nail fungus, that was available and recommended to me in 2001. 
Instead, they've switched to recommending a witch's brew with ingredients that
are still under patent, (with a high profit-margin), containing Myconazole,
Ketoconazole, Lamasil, (sp.), and Ibuprofen.  I smell the feces of "Big Pharma"
all over this situation.  Since this "new treatment" for nail fungus contains no
DMSO, I cannot believe that it penetrates and cures nail fungus, as [DMSO +
fluconazole] does.

   And FYI, I'd like to emphasize one big pile of "horse shxt", --- the legendary
"danger" to the eyes from DMSO.
Of course, I have never advocated putting this med, (with 100% or 90% DMSO),
directly into the eyes, even though I don't believe it would cause any permanent
damage at all.  I have gotten small amounts of this med in my eyes at times, but
it stung, and I closed my eyes tight, and it stopped stinging.  Certainly no
harm was ever done.

I believe that a savvy doctor should create a Rx of perhaps [6% DMSO + ?%
fluconazole], at some point in the future, to apply directly into the eyes to
cure ocular rosacea, while also applying the 10% to 45% med on the facial skin
rosacea.  But I'm not a doctor, so I'm not pushing the eye drops, although I
have mentioned it before on the [rosacea-cure] board.
   For over two years now, Rx eye drops containing over 6% DMSO, (and other
ingredients), have been prescribed, to prevent, treat, and cure cataracts,
mostly in the elderly.  It seems obvious, that the DMSO is added for its amazing
"transport/penetration" properties, rather than having any curative effect on
the cataracts.  I believe this amazing DMSO "transdermal transport capability"
is also the obvious reason why [DMSO + fluconazole] works to cure rosacea,
rather than any direct curative effect by the DMSO alone.

   And the lies about DMSO harming the eyes originated over 40 years ago, when
drug companies created this lie because they could not patent DMSO, so they
wanted to find "something similar" to patent, so they could make money.  The lie
persists, but they never found ANYTHING even REMOTELY SIMILAR to DMSO.  Finally,
15 years later in 1978, DMSO was approved by the FDA for a specific human use.

If DMSO could cause any eye damage, (temporary or permanent), THE FDA WOULD HAVE
CERTAINLY NEVER APPROVED IT, 27 YEARS AGO!!!  However, since I have seen that
[DMSO + fluconazole] can cause TEMPORARY "healing lesions" in diseased SKIN, I
do NOT recommend putting it directly into the eyes.  Creating a high enough
level of the med in the bloodstream, (e.g. by applying it inside the nose),
seems to me to be the proper way of curing ocular rosacea, with no possible risk
at all to the eyeballs, and I have recently proven this with my own use of [10%
water/90% DMSO + 50% fluconazole], (see explanation below).

   Concerning curing ocular rosacea in this way, (without any still non-existent
[6% DMSO + ?% fluconazole] eye drops), I'm going to tell you something I've not
put on the [rosacea-cure] board yet, simply because I'm "in the middle" of
assessing the effects of the [(10% water/90% DMSO) + 50% fluconazole], used in
about a two to four ml amount on the inside of my nose.

First, I want to say that this high-percentage, 50% med, (used inside the nose),
is obviously curing "ocular rosacea" that I did not know that I had, as well as
curing the "infestation" on both sides of the septum, (i.e. the middle dividing
cartilage), inside my nose.  But the directions for using this med, for nail
fungus on the toes, (and as I used it on the back of my hands), is to apply it
twice a day, for six weeks!
   That's just not a schedule I have been able to adhere to, with all the hassle
of applying this EFFECTIVELY inside my nose, so this cure is taking decidedly
longer than six weeks, but it's the only cure in existence, so I'm thankful to
God for it.

Also, even the 1% med, back in Nov. 2001, immediately dried up and began to cure
this problem inside my nose, (using only the little bit of med I applied with
q-tips), ending most of the deadly sleep apnea this problem was causing because
of the blockage of my nose breathing while sleeping.

   Second, I want to caution you, THAT I DON'T THINK ANYONE CAN KEEP A "NORMAL
SCHEDULE", WHILE USING THIS 50% MED AS I HAVE, INSIDE MY NOSE.  You'll normally
need to "vacation" for at least a few days.  Anyone who has to go to a "job"
every day, or have any kind of normal social interactions, simply could not have
done it very well, (if at all), given the difficulty of my results.

On Nov. 11, 2005, I put 2.25 ml of [(10% water/90% DMSO) + 10% fluconazole] into
ONLY my LEFT NOSTRIL, after I packed it with an 18-inch by quarter-inch piece of
gauze.  I laid on my back on the bed with my head hanging over the edge, (to
position my nasal passage upside-down), to make sure the med went where I wanted
it to, far up into my nasal passage, for almost two hours.  RESULTS WERE GOOD,
AND I CONTINUED A NORMAL "SCHEDULE", with a "scab" forming on the affected nasal
area, even until the present.

Portions of this "infestation" that were located lower on the septum were cured
long ago, by my application of the 1% and 10% med with q-tips, inside my nose,
since Nov. 2001.  But this recent more aggressive application, with the gauze,
(to prevent "nasal secretions" from washing away the med), was causing a new
"healing scab" much further up on the nasal septum.

   There has been some bleeding every day, when I remove this "scabbing" inside
my nose, using soap and my pinky finger, in the shower.  And that minor bleeding
is normal, as happened on the back of my hand, and on my scalp, when I cured
"ringworm" there.
   Such bleeding has NEVER occurred for those curing facial rosacea or rhinophyma
with this 10% med, although the skin can get raw, and "picking at it" can cause
very minor bleeding.
But the mucus membranes inside the nose easily bleed a little bit, when the
"scabbing" is removed on a daily basis, to open up the breathing passages(s).

   Then, on about Nov. 29, 2005, I finally got the 50% med, (containing 10%
water, because DMSO "transports" and penetrates better at a 90% concentration,
for some unknown reason).  I put 2.25 ml of this 50% med into ONLY my RIGHT
NOSTRIL, using gauze as before.  After about an hour, I took out the gauze and
chewed on it thoroughly, to swallow all the med.

I guess I limited it to one nostril at a time because it was more convenient to
be able to continue breathing some through my nose.
Also, the 50% med "crystallized" some, in the gauze, so about a 40% or 45% med
is probably going to be more appropriate to use, than the 50% med.  Later, I
mixed in a little of some 10% med I had with the 50% med, and this
"precipitation of crystals" did not occur again.

   Wow!  After a couple of days, a bit of hell broke loose.  At the same time, I
seemed to come down with some very bad flu, and I still have a very minor cough
from that flu, as I type this, on Jan. 22, 2006, (that's over 50 darned days
later!).  (Of course, it's conceivable that I had a "fungal infestation" in my
lungs, and this 50% med in my nose began to cure that, (through the
bloodstream), but that's most likely not the case.)
So, I believe I can separate the "symptoms" of that "coughing flu", (because I
had an identical flu back in 2000), from the dramatic "symptoms" caused by using
that amount of the 50% med in my right nostril.

Most dramatically, after one or two days, small "healing lesions" occurred in
about 3 or 4 spots on the edges of each of my four eyelids.  This meant that I
woke up in the mornings with my eyes sealed shut by these "scabs", and a fair
amount of thick pus, (perhaps two to five cubic millimeters), in each eye.  The
eyes were also bloodshot, and the inside of my eyelids were a bright red.

   This went on for about 3 or 4 days.  My eyes continued to "water" at times,
(and feel "dried out"), for the next three weeks.  My eyes are still a bit
bloodshot, and I believe that's good, because that shows that the normal process
of this cure is proceeding, with my immune system continuing to attack whatever
this med has "killed", in and around my eyes.  For this reason, I would not have
wanted to suppress this "bloodshot" appearance, because I want my immune system
to work freely, (so, no "Visine" for me).

   It is an entirely different situation, (but deserves some explanation), that
one moronic "rosacea remedy" recommended by that peanut-gallery PhD, "Dr. N",
has been topically applied "Cyclosporin", which suppresses the immune system,
and thereby suppresses inflammation.  It has been established that certain ORAL
antibiotics also are used for their anti-inflammation effects, on rosacea.  I
call this "moronic", because it is truely a "stab in the dark", to suppress
inflammatory symptoms, while admitting that you don't have a clue as to WHAT IS
CAUSING THE ROSACEA INFLAMMATION!!!  But these "morons" are no doubt perpetually
selling a lot of Cyclosporin and Tetracycline for "Big Pharma", (as well as
selling various wildly expensive, non-curative laser/IPL so-called
"treatments"), so perhaps they are more evil than moronic.

   For many decades, I have occasionally had painful "sties" on the edges my
eyelids, and it seemed odd to me that they were always in exactly the same
location(s).  I figured it must have been from "inflamed eyelash follicles", or
some such thing.  I am now convinced that I will never have such a "sty" again,
because I believe they were being caused by some sort of underlying "fungal
infestation", which is now finally being "removed" by this application of [(10%
water/90% DMSO) + 50% fluconazole] inside my nose, which is curing this
"problem" in my eyelids, (and in my eyeballs), THROUGH THE BLOODSTREAM.

   I never noticed any "plumpness" before, but my eyelids seem somehow "less
plump", and perhaps once or twice a day, I'm still experiencing a gratifying
"healing itch", which is hard to "scratch", without touching the eyeball.  But
I'm able to scratch it using a cloth/tissue, or just rubbing my whole eye-socket
area with the heel of my palm or the side of my index finger.  Sometimes I have
scratched with my fingernail, taking great care not to scratch the eyeball.

   I found some plain otc "petrolatum ophthalmic ointment - sterile ocular
lubricant", called "Puralube Ointment", at Wal-Mart's Pharmacy Dept., and used
that to sooth my eyes, especially WHILE SLEEPING.  Since it's basically grease,
it causes some distortion in your vision, if you use it during the day.  Given
the lies told about DMSO "eye damage", I suppose this could cause some people to
have a heart attack, if they think the "grease distortion" is caused by DMSO. 
Ha, ha.

Although my eyes are in good shape now, I think I'm still a little better off if
I use a little of the "lubricant/ointment" in my eyes at night, even seven weeks
after this "treatment"/ cure.
   Other than a very sore "voice box" and coughing, there was never really that
much discomfort, except from the torrent of very liquid "post-nasal drip", which
is confused with the flu symptoms.  This was a special problem at night,
(causing sleep apnea), and for three nights I had to take a "nasal
decongestant", to allow me to sleep some.  I also had a "sinus headache" so I
took Excedrin for Sinus Headache, containing (650 mg acetaminophen - a pain
killer), and (10 mg Phenyliphrine HCl - the nasal decongestant), and no
caffeine.  I used this only at night.  How much of this serious problem was
caused by the [(10% water/90% DMSO) + 50% fluconazole], and how much by the flu,
I don't know, but the earlier [(10% water/90% DMSO + 10% fluconazole] did not
cause this "large" post-nasal drip, nor any sinus headache pain.

The "post nasal drip" temporarily caused by this med, (without the flu), appears
to be very thick and "gummy", and is normally just off-white yellow, or
whitish-clear to translucent in color.

   So, every day, for about forty days, I was loudly sniffling/snuffling, loudly
hocking up "lugies" at all hours of the day, and also snorting chunks of bloody
nasal phlegm and "scabs" into my bathroom sink, especially to try to prevent
sleep apnea from this "stuff", before I go to sleep every night.  Although it's
radically decreased in amount, I'm still doing this "nasal cleaning" at least
once a day, (using soap and my pinky finger), even 53 days later.

   Wow! This does sound like a "horse shxt" cure, but I blame the flu, too.  And
by God it is a cure, and I'm very sure that people regularly commit suicide
because of the effects of these damnable "parasitic fungal infestations", so I'm
very happy with my "bloody nasal phlegm and scabs nasal cure".  Bear in mind
that I long ago completely cured the rosacea on my cheeks, and the rhinophyma of
my nose, using only the 1% and 10% meds.

Of course, some "scabbing" is still forming every day on the septum inside my
nose, with some bleeding as well, when I remove it.  But the "scabbing" and
bleeding are much less now; so it's time for another "med application".  Ugh, it
stings, but I love it...., BECAUSE IT'S THE ONLY CURE FOR THIS IN EXISTENCE.... 
I believe that the only other "remedy" for this nasal condition would be the
brutal, ugly, ineffective nasal surgery, (which doctors have actually apologized
for doing), described in the article at the URL listed on our [rosacea-cure]
Home Page, at:
http://www.jsonline.com/alive/news/jan03/108386.asp

A "theory" I've recently formed, for an even more effective and aggressive cure,
is to "engineer" some sort of small "nasal plug", (similar to an earplug), with
a "string" attached, so that it can be easily removed.  These "plugs" would then
be pushed far up into both nasal passages, (perhaps with a q-tip), and the
patient would lie down with their head hanging over the edge of the bed, (to
position the nose upside-down).  [(10% water/90% DMSO) + 45% fluconazole],
(which is water-thin), would then be measured into both sides of the nose,
(perhaps with an eyedropper), and this position would be maintained for as long
as possible, (at least an hour or two), allowing the straight liquid med to be
absorbed by the upper nasal cavity, while the patient breaths through their
mouth.  If the liquid med does not fill the nose completely, a q-tip could be
inserted into the nose during this "treatment", to continuously bathe the entire
inside of the nose with the med.

I simply do not have the "engineering expertise" to accomplish this at this
time, since this "plug and string" would have to be really reliable, to prevent
my having to go to an Emergency Room to have "plugs" removed from my nose. :-)  
But I'm sure this will be the next step I take, if this "gauze stuffing"
approach does not accomplish this cure completely for me.  It is working well on
my nasal septum, but I'm thinking that a more aggressive application of the med
might be required, to most effectively and completely cure either ocular rosacea
and/or the "sinusitis" that is described at:
http://www.jsonline.com/alive/news/jan03/108386.asp

   There is one thing that bothers me, [name deleted], about your positive and
informative email to me.  If you've been using this med for a full year, (even
though I understand that you stopped using it for probably much of that time, as
you state, "on and off"), you should KNOW that this med is curative, and you
should have no doubtful thoughts left by now, when you say,
>"but if your profitting from this in anyway with false
>claims ...shame on you..."
I just don't understand how you could have any doubt about this curing you, if
you've used this 10% med for over a year.  First, you should have seen at least
some tangible results by now.  Secondly, you should be very aware by now, that
this med has a basically zero effect on healthy skin.  Those two facts alone
should keep you from doubting me, about this, so I hope you're not some "agent
of Big Pharma", making this up and pumping me for info.... :-)

   BTW, I've never had anything against making money from this, (or benefiting in
any way), but it has turned out to be such a "hard sell", that I haven't figured
out how to profit from this.  I faced that reality, before I ever put this on
the Internet, back in April 2003.  If I had tried to take out some patent, or
had found some other way to profit, (e.g. Dr. Syrokomski's secretive, selfish
approach, [which is my opinion of "Dr. S.", formed with only "circumstantial"
proof]), it seemed to me that this cure would never be revealed, (or be delayed
for many decades or forever), given the power and deviousness of "Big Pharma",
and other factors.

So I gave up on profiting from this, in the name of God's mercy and true love. 
But when you're completely cured in the future, and if you want to donate to a
charity of my choice, I'll take it, because I am doing important "religious
work", which is in fact even much more important than my trying to get this
treatment/cure to all those
  suffering people out there, as God has led me to do.  :-)

   Also BTW, you're right to NOT trust Brady Barrows, concerning this cure.  In
my opinion, BB is betraying all of the hundred of millions of persons with
diseases curable with [DMSO + fluconazole], since Sept. 2004, when he
prematurely ended his "diary", working with that infamous PhD, Geoffrey Nase. 
And it's obviously for money.  Just look at the ads at BB's website, (or better
yet, DON'T look at them). :-)

BB is still telling the blackest of half-truth lies, saying this med, "did not
cure my rosacea", even though he admitted in his so-called "diary", that it got
rid of all his pustules and papules, (which this former oil-field worker used to
call "postules", until I educated him in private email).  In my opinion, that's
about 90% of the worst rosacea symptoms, so by his own words, he is lying about
this.  If he were honest, he'd say, "so far, this med cured my rosacea 90%, and
it hasn't come back, either".

Recently, I discovered that BB is marketing an "electrical zapper" to get rid of
pimples, pustules, and papules, (honest to God, folks), while he no doubt
continues to secretly use [DMSO + 10% fluconazole], as he repeated stated, until
Sept. 2004.  Back then, BB even publicly stated that he'd had a complete "exam"
by an ophthalmologist, to prove that his eyes are in top shape, after applying
[DMSO + fluconazole] to his face almost daily, for five months.

So in my opinion, BB is trying to play both ends against the middle, by "hiding"
positive statements about this cure on his website, so that he can someday claim
that he was "helping" rosaceans all along, when rosaceans finally overcome the
lying silence from him since Sept. 2004, about this cure.

   So it is now clear to me that BB set out from the beginning to tell half-truth
lies about this, because his "rosacea business" would end, if he admitted this
is a cure.

THAT'S WHY I CONTINUE TO STRONGLY RECOMMEND THAT NO ONE POST ANYTHING AT ALL ON
ANY WEBSITE CONNECTED TO BB OR TO ANY OF THESE LIARS, because they make money by
laboriously "muddying the water", and attracting attention to their "Web
Circus".  Also, there is good reason to believe that "they" have the financial
backing to send "hackers" and "cyber-attacks" against you, once "they" know you
support this amazing cure, and they learn your email address.

   So there is a $pecial Hell reserved for Brady Barrow$, et al, concerning this
matter, and every day they fail to tell the full truth about this [DMSO +
fluconazole] cure, the Hell they face gets wor$e.  Every day that passes, (and
with every dollar they make), these "infestations", (including rosacea), cause
more damage to people, and this damage cannot be reversed or restored by this
[DMSO + fluconazole] cure.  So the delay caused by these liars is causing a
great prolongation and increase in suffering, worldwide.

Universal Spiritual Laws will require punishment for these liars, according to
the amount of delay/damage that they cause to suffering humanity, concerning
this [DMSO + fluconazole] treatment/cure.

   So, [name deleted], I have run on here, and I hope this info helps you. 
Please continue to update me on your progress, although I know it can take
months to properly assess this cure.
God Bless, ITN & IDFN,
Dave Fleming
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 20:06:36 -0800 (PST)
From:  [name deleted]
Subject: Re: [rosacea-cure] [(10%water/90% DMSO) + 50% fluconazole] Is Now Being
Prescribed in USA
To: "Dave Fleming" <fulltruth40@...>
   Dear Dave: I have been using DMSO 10% diflucan for a
year on and off............When I contacted a
Compounding pharmacy they  initially tried to talk me
out of using Dmso as a base .....They went onto to say
that it penetrates into the blood stream
..........................and yet never offered a
suggestion to a base that penetrates deep enough  to
reach the sebaceous glands--- They further stated that
Rosacea is a surface disease........to which I
responded........... Horse Shxt!............If that
were the case this disease would have been eradicated
with topical meds years ago..............Either
way..........I am writing to let you know how I am
responding as of yet.............My cheeks have
responded very minimally...........nose is still
red......when I apply the med to my nose it turns
white and dried out looking and stings for 15-17
minutes........then it returns to a pinkish
hue..........................I am using it once every
2 weeks(no repeated applications) because of the
reports of eye damage using dmso..............A second
thing that occurs  when I apply the med is  my eyes
get a little warm.....I dont know if the med is
damaging my eyes or the disease is also in my eyes as
well .......God only knows..........I have had this
disease for 20 years and it has ruined my
life..........It causes embarassment,flushing and
edema of the nose...........I do concur with you that
Rosacea will eventuall turn into
Rhynophyma....................Could you let me know
what other users are
experiencing?.......................................I
just pray to God for some signal that I am on the
right direction,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,.P.S Brady Barrow
claims dmso might have helped but is not fully
endorcing it........He has sold out and I could never
trust him anyway,,,,,,.................Dave,  if your
right .......God Bless you for getting the word out,
but if your profitting from this in anyway with false
claims .....................shame on you..............
God bless in return....[name deleted] .......................
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

   Dave Fleming <fulltruth40@...> wrote:
> Hi,
> Flushing, or "blushing" is a normal function,
> experienced by everyone at times.  Normal blushing
> is simply made worse in some people, (the majority
> of rosaceans do not "flush"), by rosacea, and they
> call this abnormally exaggerated blushing,
> "flushing".
> I was "officially diagnosed" with rosacea for many
> years, but I've never "flushed".
>   By the time I was beginning to have the horrendous
> beginnings of rhinophyma, (which I believe all
> rosaceans will develop if they wait long enough), I
> was not seeing a doctor regularly, and therefore was
> never "officially diagnosed" with rhinophyma, and
> did not even know the word.   But I've educated
> myself, since I first put this cure on the Internet
> in April 2003, and I'm very sure that I had
> rhinophyma.
> If you search on the [rosacea-cure] board, you will
> find references to the questions and explanations
> concerning flushing, explained very well by
> Dr. Marjorie Lazoff, MD.  The bottom line is: cure the
> rosacea with [DMSO + fluconazole], and "flushing"
> will return to "normal blushing".
> I hope this helps.
> God Bless, ITN & IDFN,
> Dave Fleming
> xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2005 19:57:23 -0800 (PST)
> To: rosacea-cure@yahoogroups.com
> From: [name deleted]
> Subject: Re: [rosacea-cure] [(10%water/90% DMSO) +
> 50% fluconazole] Is Now Being Prescribed in USA
>
>   Dear Dave :  I was interested if you had the
> flushing
> associated with rosacea and other signs of this
> disfiguring disease?............Thanks [name deleted]---



---------------------------------
  Yahoo! Autos. Looking for a sweet ride? Get pricing, reviews, & more on new and
used cars.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

For Everyone,
   I have confirmed that [(10% water/90%DMSO) + 50% fluconazole] is now being
prescribed in the USA, although its price is still way too high, because of
price manipulation in the USA.
Significantly, this Rx is now being prescribed with the notation,
"Apply To Affected Area",
rather than just the previous limited notation,
"Apply To Affected Nails".

   I do not want to attract unfair attention to those savvy, compassionate USA
doctors who are prescribing [DMSO + fluconazole] for rosacea, so I am sorry that
I do not feel free to list them here.  "Seek and ye shall find" has to remain
the best advice I can offer, in obtaining this Rx for rosacea....

   Certainly at least some USA doctors must be waking up to the reality that this
topically applied med is curing many previously incurable diseases of the skin,
(such as rosacea).  Other diseases that I personally know are cured by this med,
are nail fungus, athlete's foot, tinea versicolor, ringworm, and other
"undefined" diseases I have cured on my hands and on my left arm.

   Although it is more difficult for me to "know and prove", a "weakness" in my
vocal cords, (which radically had reduced my ability to sing for more than a few
minutes, since about 1990), has also been cured, probably by the med that I
applied inside my nose during the past four years, although it might have also
been "reached" by whatever systemic levels this med reached in my bloodstream,
from my occasional med applications on my toes, face, hands, and arms, during
the last four years.

   The "problem" inside my nose has still not been completely cured, although it
has been radically improved, even from the very beginning, in Oct./Nov. 2001,
when the deadly sleep apnea this problem had been causing me was radically
reduced.
I am presently planning to become much more aggressive, by using the [(10%
water/90%DMSO) + 50% fluconazole].  I plan to use (18 inch by quarter-inch)
pieces of gauze, packed far up into each nostril, and then apply a minimum of
two ml of this 50% med in each nostril, which will contain 500 mg per ml, or a
total of 2,000 mg, (i.e. 2 grams), of fluconazole, in four ml.  Also, I will be
lying on my back on a bed, with my head hanging over the edge, so that this med
will be mostly staying in my upper nostrils.  I plan to keep this position for
at least an hour or two, (probably watching TV upside down!), so that the med
will be in full contact with the entire upper nasal area for that extended time.
I also plan to chew on this gauze throughly, to completely ingest any remaining
med content, before throwing the gauze away.

   I WOULD LIKE TO EMPHASIZE THAT I BELIEVE THAT THIS AGGRESSIVE METHOD OF
APPLICATION, USING THE [(10% water/90% DMSO) + 50% fluconazole], (INCLUDING
TOPICAL APPLICATION TO THE EXTERIOR NOSE SKIN), WOULD MOST LIKELY BE THE BEST
METHOD OF CURING RHINOPHYMA.

   Because of the unsightly, rather slow, (i.e. weeks, and even months long),
healing changes the skin can go through, (involving the slow working of our
immune system, to "remove" the "dead body" of this parasitical organism), during
this treatment/cure, (and because this Rx is still probably difficult to obtain
for rosacea in the USA), this cure is not being proclaimed as it should be, in
my opinion.
In fact, since this med shows clearly that it is "working", on diseased
skin/tissue, (and has virtually zero effect on healthy skin/tissue), the usual
smoke-screens and lies simply cannot successfully deny the effectiveness of this
treatment/cure.

   Patient and persistent application of this med is the key to this cure, and we
will also be patient and persistent on this [rosacea-cure] board, in stating the
full truth with a clear voice, that this med cures rosacea/rhinophyma, and a
great number of other skin diseases, some of which I believe have not even been
given specific names.
   Amen, and amen.
God Bless, ITN & IDFN,
Dave Fleming


---------------------------------
Yahoo! Shopping
  Find Great Deals on Gifts at Yahoo! Shopping

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

For Everyone,
Here is a recent email between me and "Janey", the first person ever to be
prescribed this med for rosacea in the USA, back in Oct. 2003.  Past posts on
the [rosacea-cure] board by "Janey", (her fictitious name), are at:
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/204
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/262

So I am not backing down on my claim that this med is the only known cure for
rosacea/rhinophyma, even though it is decidedly not an "overnight" cure.

In addition, the fact that the use of [DMSO + fluconazole] may lead to the cure
or prevention of all manner of diseases that presently have no known cause, is
amazing to contemplate.  The "theory" is that many of these mysterious diseases
may be caused by the effects and cascade effects of "chronic systemic
mycotoxins" secreted into our bloodstream by "stealthy fungal infestations" and
even by "fungal infestations" that are not so stealthy, such as
rosacea/rhinophyma.

This "theory of mechanism" then, would be that [DMSO + fluconazole] destroys the
"fungal infestations", thereby ending the constant, long-term presence of
"chronic mycotoxins" in our bloodstream, which would end any disease condition
caused by the effects of these "chronic mycotoxins".  The high probability that
this "theory" is correct, is mind-boggling, to say the least.  Wow!!!  :-D
God Bless, ITN & IDFN,
Dave Fleming ----TEXT OF EMAILS FOLLOWS----

Dave Fleming wrote:
Hi, Janey,
I just want to say to you, that I really appreciate your continuing updates and
questions, because you are the only person who spoke of God, in our
communication, of all those who have contacted me.  Sometimes, I almost feel
guilty, if I gave you the impression that this cure was going to be "quick" or
"easy".
I know that I did not knowingly do that, but I still remember your excitement in
the beginning, and I wanted you to have the best experience with this cure,
rather than having it "drag on" like this.  I know that you have admitted that
you stopped using the med many times, (and I understand how that happens,
because I've done the same thing).

Even so, I have always believed, (whether correctly or not), that those with
"mild cases" of rosacea would be cured faster and more easily than I was, with
my horrible beginning stages of rhinophyma.

First, to answer your question, I do not know of anyone being prescribed a
higher percentage than [DMSO + 10% fluconazole].  But I have become convinced
that adding 10% distilled water to the Rx makes it more effective, by
penetrating better, and by putting the maximum amount possible of the med into
the bloodstream.
So I now would recommend [10% water/90% DMSO + 10% fluconazole] to you. Using
the right "measuring tool" from your pharmacy, (I found a cheap syringe
graduated by ml), it isn't that hard to add the 10% steam distilled water
yourself, rather than having to have your doctor change the Rx.

Although Michael Roberge, RPh, promised me the info two months ago, (about June
28), he only got it to me Aug. 26, after he finally did the rather simple
"experiment", to find out the MAXIMUM AMOUNT of fluconazole that will dissolve
in one milliliter of DMSO at room temperature.  He has promised to also test, to
find out the maximum amount of fluconazole that will dissolve in one milliliter
of [10% water/90% DMSO], at room temperature.  He and I are both guessing that
it will be very similar or identical to the 62.5% figure he's determined for the
100% DMSO, although DMSO is so strange, and so mysterious, that you really
cannot be sure until you actually dissolve the fluconazole in the [10% water/90%
DMSO].
Here is the statement that I finally received from Michael Roberge, RPh:
" I was able to fully dissolve 8.75 gm of Fluconazole in 10 ml of DMSO.  This
mixture resulted in a final volume of 14 ml  thereby creating a 62.5% solution."

So according to his experimental results, [DMSO + 62.5% fluconazole] is the
highest percentage possible, using the 100% DMSO.
Of course, because of the mystery of how DMSO "transports" the fluconazole
through the skin, we don't actually know that the highest percentage will be the
most effective cure.  But it's likely, since I think that you and I are both
convinced that the 10% med is much more effective than the 1% med.

And I believe that you are "right on the beam", when you ask these questions,
about higher percentages of fluconazole, and about ORAL [DMSO + fluconazole]. 
(That figures, since you started with the 1% med in Oct. 2003, used the 10% med
in 2004, and continue to improve now, in August 2005.)  You've been "at this"
longer than anyone except me!
I have suspected that I am indeed "obsessed" with this cure, because the only
answer that comes to my mind, when it does not cure us as quickly as we wish, is
that "we need more of it".  So my mind has indeed been going in that direction,
not only of using the highest percentage of fluconazole possible, (e.g. such as
[DMSO + 50% fluconazole), but of "flooding the whole body" with [DMSO +
fluconazole], which would be facilitated by "administering" a rather large
amount.

So, THEORETICALLY, to cure, (or at least start to cure), "ALL POSSIBLE fungal
infestations" in the whole body, one might drink 15 ml of the 10% med, (or 3 ml
of [DMSO + 50% fluconazole]???).  The 15 ml of 10% med would contain 1,500 mg of
fluconazole, (as would the 3 ml of [DMSO + 50% fluconazole]), and perhaps as
much as 150 mg of that DMSO-fluconazole, (still bound to the DMSO, so that it
would be 100% effective, as opposed to ineffective ORAL fluconazole alone),
would circulate throughout the body.

Of course, any amount of DMSO we ingest over about 5 ml will most likely give us
the annoyance of the temporary "garlic breath" from the metabolism of the DMSO,
but that's not important, except as information for those taking this.

Then, to push this "theory" further, this dose might even be repeated on a
regular basis, (perhaps once a month, or even more often???).  ORAL fluconazole
is known to be very effective partially because it has a very long "half-life"
in the bloodstream.  In other words, it takes at least a few days, before it is
metabolized/erased by the body, so even a one-time dose of 150 mg is known to
cure a woman's vaginal candida/yeast infection completely.  I assume that
DMSO-fluconazole also has this long half-life in the bloodstream, so I don't
know how much ORALLY ADMINISTERED [DMSO + 10% fluconazole] we might want to
take, over a period of time.

In any case, I assume you've read my r-c post #272, as at:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/272
Because I'm so excited about this "Final Theory of Mechanism", I feel that post
#272 is the most important post of any I have ever placed on the r-c board!!!

And of course, I can't prove this recent expansive "Theory of Mechanism", and it
could be 100% incorrect, which would mean that only the diseases discovered to
be curable so far, such as rosacea/rhinophyma, tinea versicolor, (i.e. "liver
spots"), "ringworm" of the scalp, athelete's foot, and various other
"non-specific" diseases are cured by [DMSO + fluconazole].

But the possible havoc caused by these "chronic systemic mycotoxins" just makes
so much sense to me, and it involves possibly curing, (or at the very least
preventing), all sorts of "idiopathic" diseases, which are diseases that
presently have no known cause.  It's truly mind-boggling to me, to contemplate.

This would be an even bigger discovery than penicillin/antibiotics were, to all
mankind, since it MIGHT cure or prevent such diseases as "chronic fatigue
syndrome", or even certain types of cancer, or just a whole long list of
diseases that presently have unknown causes.
Here's a partial list of "idiopathic" diseases I found, (that might actually be
cured or prevented by getting rid of any chronic mycotoxins in our bloodstream):
* Autoimmune disorders:
rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis, Type 1 diabetes, scleroderma,
myasthenia gravis
* Endocrine diseases
* Syndromes and diseases of unknown etiology, or of mixed causes:
Alzheimer's disease, cancer, hypoglycemia, chronic fatigue syndrome, acquired
neuromyotonia (Isaac's syndrome), Guillain-Barre syndrome, Stevens-Johnson
syndrome, Meniere's disease
* Neurological disorders and mental illnesses:
schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, depression, obsessive-compulsive disorder,
eating disorders, dementia
* Psychogenic illness
multiple chemical sensitivity --- "MCS", mass sociogenic illness, ...

And this med is so safe, that anyone, (especially those over age 30 or 40, who
would more likely benefit from it), could ORALLY take a whopping dose of this
med, just to see if they could detect any "changes" in their body or on their
skin, that would tell them that they had any of these "stealthy fungal
infestations".  Then, direct topical applications of this med on any skin
infestations might be called for, to cure them completely.

For example, I recently applied more of the 10% med than I ever had before, on a
daily basis, by pouring small amounts of it on my scalp and rubbing it around
with my finger tips, to cure what I assume was a case of "ringworm".  It sounds
strange, even to me, but INSIDE my right arm, just below the shoulder, I began
experiencing some pain, only when I moved my arm in a certain way, using a
certain muscle.

Well, any normal person would assume that they "pulled a muscle", but after a
couple of days, it occurred to me that many times in my early life, I was
probably given shots with a hypodermic needle, in the very location that I was
experiencing this "sort of strange" pain.  I say "sort of strange", because I do
not remember "pulling the muscle", and it "just so happened" to appear after I
used a lot of the 10% med, for several days in a row, on my scalp.

Incidentally, for at least four or five days, there was a striking "fever", in
the two parts of my scalp with the "ringworm".  I never saw it, but I felt it,
and there were two areas with an open wound about a centimeter across.  By
reaching my arm up, I could place the inside of my forearm on the area, and only
the "infested" areas were really "hot" with fever, while the rest of my scalp
where I applied the med were normal, which I could actually feel with my arm.
Well, the "ringworm" is gone, and the "strange arm pain" is mostly gone, after a
week or two.  And I will perhaps never know, whether there was some parasitical
fungal infestation in my arm that I cured, that had been growing there since it
was placed there by a hypodermic needle jab, perhaps even when I was three years
old, when I went overseas with my parents.
Of course, the "fungal spores" would not have been on the sterile needle, but on
my skin, and "pushed into my arm", when the needle pierced my skin.  Even the
classic pre-rub of the skin with a swab dipped in rubbing alcohol, (which is
certainly not always done, before injections), might not have removed such
"fungal spores", since the rubbing alcohol is meant only to kill bacteria that
might be "pushed into" the arm.

One might also ask, "Why no pain in the left arm, since we've all undoubtedly
gotten shots in both arms, at one time or another".  But this sort of
"introduction" of "fungal spores" into the body would certainly be a "hit or
miss" situation, whereby not every injection would cause this.

So my belief, is that I reached higher levels of [DMSO + fluconazole] in my
bloodstream than ever before, and it had enough of a "curative effect" to cause
me to notice the "twinge" in my arm muscle, where presumably some sort of
parasitical fungal infestation was growing.  Of course, I believe that this same
sort of curative phenomenon, (involving "stealthy fungal infestations" that have
been "introduced" into any part of the body by any breaking of the skin,
surgery, or dental work), will occur for almost everyone over the age of 30 or
40, if they get their bloodstream levels of [DMSO + fluconazole] to a high
enough level.

And that level does not have to be very high.
I used perhaps 7 or 10 ml of the 10% med on my scalp, over a period of perhaps
three or four days.  If we say 10 ml, that contained 1,000 mg of fluconazole,
and we know from Dr. Jacob, MD, that most likely less then 10% of the TOPICALLY
APPLIED med goes into the bloodstream. So the total amount of [DMSO +
fluconazole] that entered my bloodstream contained perhaps 100 mg of
fluconazole-DMSO.

So there you have it --- the latest ravings of a cure advocate....
:-D
I pray that you are 100% cured of your rosacea as soon as possible, Janey.  And
who knows, you said you also like it for curing athlete's foot too, and higher
strengths of this med may cure you of lots of "other stuff" you don't even know
you have, just as it has in my case, because I've applied so much more of this
med than you ever have.  :-D
God Bless, ITN & IDFN,
Dave Fleming
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Date:   Tue, 23 Aug 2005 04:46:33 +0000
From:   "Janey"
To:   fulltruth40@... <fulltruth40@...>
Subject:   rosacea cure/dmso

Hello Dave,
I know I haven't written in a long time, but not much new to
report. I am still using the 10% fluconazole with slooow improvements. I
read a one of your email about oral Fluconazole/diflucan. What do you think
and have you heard if anybody has been prescribed a higher dose than 10%?
Thank you.
Janey

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

For Everyone,
Here is an email from someone who cannot find a USA doctor to prescribe [DMSO +
10% fluconazole] for rosacea.
If you can't find a USA doctor who will prescribe this med, I believe you should
begin to contemplate fighting back.  You may lose the battle, but win the war,
since USA MDs are "protected", but they certainly do not like being forced to go
to court to explain themselves.
If anyone out there has the means to begin to sue doctors who refuse to
prescribe [DMSO + 10% fluconazole] for rosacea, please, please do so.  The more
public exposure of this situation in the USA, the better.

In spite of the outrageous lies about DMSO by a certain inconsequential
peanut-gallery PhD, no USA MD has any viable excuse for refusing to prescribe
this inexpensive, benign med, especially for a simple trial usage.
God Bless, ITN & IDFN,
Dave Fleming---TEXT OF EMAILS FOLLOWS, (in reverse chronological order)----

Dave Fleming wrote:
Hi, (name deleted),
The USA doctors that are prescribing this have not yet gotten together to "go
public" on this, so it's hard for me to help you.
Have you found the directions I've posted on this?
On the Home Page, towards the bottom, I list the "referral link" for Compounding
Pharmacists, at:
http://www.iacprx.org/referral_service/index.html
Contacting CPs by phone is much easier than trying to get any doctor on the
phone.  Then, you ask the CPs for a list of doctors that have written any
compounded Rx at all for that CP.

Then you try to reach the doctors to see if they're willing to prescribe [DMSO +
10% fluconazole] for rosacea.  (This is the hard part, since MDs normally won't
give any info by phone, but insist that you pay for an appointment, to find out
they won't help you....)  :-(

Of course, if you're lucky, at least one of the CPs will say that they know a
doctor who has already prescribed this med for rosacea.  You should also bear in
mind that it is possible to send your medical history to an MD, and he can
legally write this Rx with just that medical history, without meeting with you;
so even a doctor thousands of miles from you might be able and willing to write
this Rx for you.

I realize that my above directions can easily lead to a "dead end", but it's the
best I know of, in the USA.  I'm very sorry I cannot be of more help, but that's
the nature of battling the "Big Pharma" 800 pound gorrilla in the USA.

My adamant parting thought, is that I hope that you never allow the doctors who
have refused you the right to even TRY this benign topical [DMSO + 10%
fluconazole], to make any money from you in the future.  I know that's not
always practical, if you live in an area where your local doctor doesn't have
any "competition", but it certainly angers me, to think that these doctors have
refused you with no consequences for their criminal refusal.

In fact, I believe that these "refusing doctors" should be sued in open court,
for causing irreversable damage and a prolongation of suffering that are
entirely unethical and even criminal.  I may sound ridiculous, to say this,
since we all know how "protected" MDs are, (by "Big Pharma", and even by the
AMA), but at least it would be a start.

Perhaps if an MD knew he'd be questioned publicly in court about his refusal, he
might think twice before refusing to allow any rosacean patient to at least TRY
this benign topical [DMSO + 10% fluconazole] Rx treatment/CURE for rosacea.

As you may know, I covered the subject of those who mix this med at home, which
is legal to do in many parts of the world, at:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/170

The only info I would add, is that I would now recommend that 10% distilled
water be added to the DMSO, since I believe that the
[10% water/90% DMSO + 10% fluconazole] penetrates deeper and is more effective
than the
(DMSO + 10% fluconazole].
God Bless, ITN & IDFN,
Dave Fleming
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005
From:  (name deleted)
To: "Dave Fleming" <fulltruth40@...>
Subject: docs and thier inability to write scripts........

Hi Dave,
Thanks for all of your research in the rosacea arena. I am having an
extremely hard time getting any doctor to prescribe this med for me
(dmso and fluconazole) Would you happen to know of anyone in S.C. or
Ga. that has written this script before?
I am about at the point of manufacturing my own, but want to give a
compounding pharmacist a shot if I can ever find a doctor to write the
script.
Thanks,
(name deleted)


---------------------------------
  Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

For Everyone,
When I cured the "stealthy" infestation on the back of my left hand, (with [DMSO
+ 1% fluconazole]), and later cured the back of my right hand, (with [DMSO + 10%
fluconazole]), one important question occurred to me that I've never been able
to answer well.  The question:
"Why should we even bother to cure a 'stealthy' infestation, that is basically
invisible, and never seems to give us much 'trouble'?"

Recently, I found a possible answer.  The nature of "fungal infestations" is
that they commonly produce "mycotoxins", which serve to "digest" the nutrients
surrounding the fungi.
So we are led to ask:
"What will the effects be, if such "fungal infestation" mycotoxins end up in our
bloodstream, and throughout our body, for years or even for decades?"
I touch on the answer to this question, in the following recent private email
exchange, and it may surprise everyone.  If this "Theory of Mechanism" proves to
be valid, the curative power of [DMSO + fluconazole] will certainly range far
beyond our original expectations.
God Bless, ITN & IDFN,
Dave Fleming ---TEXT OF EMAILS FOLLOW, (in reverse chronological order)-------

Dave Fleming wrote:
Hi, [name deleted],
Thank you for the compliment of your interest in my input.
I deeply appreciate your apparent trust of my opinions, but I have to report to
you that I am a "layman", with very little "absolute knowledge" about this. 
Experience is my strong point in this matter of curing rosacea with [DMSO +
fluconazole].

I like to point out facetiously, that, because of some experience in my
background in pharmaceutical laboratory research with animals, (in which I
became a fairly proficient heart surgeon), I know just enough to make me
dangerous.  I am therefore certainly not in the usual "awe" of the "white
coats", with their self-serving, pretentious, and usually obfuscating jargon. 
:-)

But I would like to cut to the chase, and wonder with you and your colleagues,
exactly what is the "ROOT CAUSE" of rosacea?  Knowing this "ROOT CAUSE" would,
of course, make any "opinions", about IPL/laser, Accutane, (or even [drug name
deleted], whatever that is), much more trustworthy.  As long as we're in the
dark, concerning the "ROOT CAUSE" of rosacea, it seems to me that our "opinions"
about how to best get rid of it are almost moot, especially given the fact that
no one has been able to guarantee getting rid of anyone's rosacea, much less all
rosacea.

That's why I consider my "accidental" experience with [DMSO + fluconazole] to be
so revolutionary, revealing and valuable.  I tried to describe it, at:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/2
When I started posting this claim, in April 2003, I couldn't even spell
"rosacea" correctly.
Knowing what little I do, I've always resisted the urge to insist that rosacea
is "fungal based", because the bottom line is that we cannot know that 100%,
just because an antifungal with a mysteriously penetrating "DMSO vehicle" cured
my rosacea/rhinophyma.  And besides, we never HAVE to know how it "works", to
cure all rosacea.

But it's a pretty easy and reliable sounding assumption to reach.
That leaves us wondering why no one, (apparently), has ever been able to
"detect" the "rosacea causing fungal entity".  But fungi, [fun-ji], are so
diverse and powerful, that it should not surprise us if their hyphae, [hi-fee],
are so "fragile" as to escape detection by gross microscopy.

So, we have a cure for rosacea, (i.e. topical, {and probably also oral}, [DMSO +
fluconazole]), but we don't really know for sure why or how it is "working",
although even any fool should conclude that some sort of "fungal, parasitical
entity" is the "ROOT CAUSE".
Voila, a fait accompli (!!!)

So, I would hope that we can all agree that any "discussions" of "rosacea
remedies" such as IPL/laser, or Accutane, or [drug name deleted], have become
academic, in the light of this [DMSO + fluconazole] cure for rosacea.

The fact that this [DMSO + fluconazole] cure is excruciatingly slow, cumbersome,
and psychologically problematic, (since our face will look worse, before it
looks better), is admittedly slowing its acceptance, but I feel that the truth
will out.  And if necessary, we will use [DMSO + fluconazole] just as we used
Aspirin for so many decades, without ever understanding its "pharmacological
mechanism(s)" in the least.
(1)  "Oh, Aspirin gets rid of fever and relieves pain?  Great! Take it, even
though we don't know how it works!"

(2)  "Oh, [DMSO + fluconazole] gets rid of rosacea/rhinophyma, and tinea
versicolor, and ringworm, and athlete's foot, and nail fungus, and God knows how
many "non-specific" stealthy skin and other diseases that have been incurable
since time immemorial?  Great! Pour it on, even though we don't know how it
works!"

And, as Aspirin did, which was a coal tar derivative "accidentally" found to
"work",  [DMSO + fluconazole] has, (since Jan. 2004), escaped Pfizer's (17
year?) patent, and is as we type becoming more and more dirt-cheap, worldwide. 
And DMSO has always been relatively cheap.  :-D

The best opinion I've gathered, about Accutane, is that it has horrific side
effects, that caused one fellow cured by Dr. Syrokomsky to call it "rat poison".

IPL/laser is simply no more nor less than a burning of the skin, so I fail to
see any integrity in its use, (to "treat" rosacea), and my opinion is that it is
making a whole lot of bamboozling folks a whole lot of money, with the guarantee
that rosaceans will have to keep coming back for more, until the day they die,
still having rosacea.

I look forward to seeing that article you found, stating that the "oral azoles"
had a positive effect on SD and rosacea.  However, remember that the "oral
azoles" have some horrific potential side effects.  Not the least of these, is
an "endocrine effect", (especially attributed to ketoconazole, but none to
fluconazole), which makes men grow breasts and causes women to have
gynecological problems.

Permanent liver damage and death are also expected side effects, with high doses
of the "oral azoles".

Fluconazole appears to be best known as the "azole" with the least side effects,
and doctors have continued to increase the acceptable dosage, even
astronomically, to 30mg/kg of body weight, per day, if my memory serves me.
(That's 3,000 mg per day, for a 100 kg guy!!!)  The absolute maximum acceptable
dose of fluconazole at first was 400 mg per day.

Topical [DMSO + fluconazole] is looking better and better, eh, [name deleted]? 
In fact, even oral [DMSO + fluconazole] is fine, since most of the med will be
"trapped", (by the "reservoir effect" of DMSO), in the tissue it contacts, with
only less than 10% entering the bloodstream, to have beneficial, healing "whole
body effects", wherever it "discovers" these insidious, parasitical fungi, which
incidentally are very likely to be pouring mycotoxins into our whole bodies,
even though they many times appear "stealthy".

Such chronic, whole-body, low-level, (and therefore impossible to detect),
mycotoxins could very well be responsible for some of the mysterious "chronic
fatigue syndrome(s)" we've been hearing about, as well as for other
unexplainable "diseases".  So we can at least strongly suspect that diseases
with no known cause could be caused by the effects and cascade effects of the
mycotoxins any "fungal infestation" in our body would likely produce.

And remember, we do not have to "diagnose" these "stealthy, parasitical, fungal
infestations", to destroy/cure them.  [DMSO + fluconazole] is so safe, that it
can be used prophylactically, (i.e. preemptively), to "seek-and-destroy" such
POSSIBLE "infestations".  [DMSO + fluconazole] would be administered with the
intention of possibly detecting such "fungal infestations", (as they are cured),
by the "reaction" that occurs in "infested skin", when this med is used.

When I used [DMSO + 10% fluconazole] on my hand, some of the med circulated in
my bloodstream, and I found myself "itching" at more than one place on my left
arm.  When I applied the 10% med directly on these "itching spots", I discovered
that I was curing these "infestations" completely.  I "self-diagnosed" one of
those spots as tinea versicolor, and it was quite a dramatic cure, with many
"changes" that occurred in the skin, that proved it was cured.

Following is a rudimentary list of "idiopathic" diseases, (i.e. diseases with
unknown causes), that may very well turn out to be curable, by destroying the
ROOT CAUSE "fungal infestations" with [DMSO + fluconazole]:
* Autoimmune disorders:
rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis, Type 1 diabetes, scleroderma,
myasthenia gravis

* Endocrine diseases

* Syndromes and diseases of unknown etiology, or of mixed causes:
Alzheimer's disease, cancer, hypoglycemia, chronic fatigue syndrome, acquired
neuromyotonia (Isaac's syndrome), Guillain-Barre syndrome, Stevens-Johnson
syndrome, Meniere's disease

* Neurological disorders and mental illnesses:
schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, depression, obsessive-compulsive disorder,
eating disorders, dementia

* Psychogenic illness
multiple chemical sensitivity --- "MCS", mass sociogenic illness, ...

Admittedly, it might be a "stretch", to assert that "fungal infestation" chronic
mycotoxins are the ROOT CAUSE of "mental illnesses", (although it is possible),
but it is quite believable that our immune system could be radically altered by
such chronic low-level mycotoxins, (put out for decades by parasitical fungi
that have already defeated our immune system).
Such undetected, (and probably undetectable), mycotoxins could lead to
autoimmune disorders, and even to other complex damage to our immune system,
which could very well CAUSE "MCS" and other allergy manifestations.  This
complex "interplay" of the mycotoxins and our immune systems might also explain
the allergic "triggers" that plague rosaceans.

Incidentally, every surgery or dental procedure that has ever occurred has most
likely introduced these extremely slow-growing fungi into our bodies, with all
the long-term implications of those "infestations".  Because they grow slowly,
no one has ever proven that they are "caused" by surgery/dentistry.

Now, if we can overcome the "status-quo juggernaut", that seeks to suppress this
news about [DMSO + fluconazole], we need not live with the damage from that sort
of "infestation" any more.  Surgeons may end up routinely using [DMSO +
fluconazole] to prevent such fungal infestations, just as antibiotics are used
now to "pre-empt" potential bacterial infections.  Or maybe not, because no
proof exists that [DMSO + fluconazole] would destroy or inhibit "fungal spores".
But "whole body" systemic [DMSO + fluconazole] would presumably work later, to
destroy the growing "fungal entity" in the body.

Thank you for your interest, [name deleted].  I hope you and your colleagues
will be able to promote [DMSO + fluconazole] more effectively than I have.
God Bless, ITN & IDFN,
Dave Fleming
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Date:   Sun, 10 Jul 2005 16:56:46 -0700
From:   [name deleted]
To:   <fulltruth40@...>
Subject:   accutane/lasers

Dave,
I believe I read in a dermatology journal that mentioned oral fluconazole,
itraconazole, and oral ketoconazole all had a positive effect on Seborrheic derm
and had potent anti-inflammatory effects helpful for rosacea induced skin. 
There are a few links that touch on this but I will try to find you the article
that I read.

Also, in case you were interested, I am involved in a study from [company name
deleted] testing [drug name deleted] for SD and for rosacea.  I work with a team
of derms weekly and discuss with them options for rosacea/SD.  The [drug name
deleted] is mildly effective in controlling the flaking of the SD, but I think
the topical actually contributes to progressing the rosacea.  I would not
recommend it for any rosacean.

Interestingly enough, some of the derms are pro low dose accutane and some are
totally against its use.  There is one doc who believes in relatively high
(120mg/d) dose accutane for rosacea.  All however, agree that IPL and the use of
lasers for rosacea is counter-intuitive, but I've read of many first hand
accounts that attest to its efficacy.

Your thoughts on accutane and IPL would be greatly appreciated.

Thank you once again for your response and effort in this cause.
[name deleted]
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
BEGINNING OF NEXT EMAIL
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Date:   Sun, 10 Jul 2005 18:09:39 -0400
From:   fulltruth40 <fulltruth40@...>
To:   [name deleted]
Subject:   RE: rosacea-cure, and SD

Dave Fleming wrote:
Hi, [name deleted],
Thank you for your positive input.
I am quite surprised, at your statement that, "fluconazole has been proven
effective against rosacea in clinical trials".
Do you mean ORALLY ADMINISTERED fluconazole???
I know of no such proof, that ORAL fluconazole CURES rosacea. Do you?
Could you possibly tell me where I can see the evidence of those clinical
trials?
My mind has been very closed to that possibility, because I believe that the
dosage and chronic, long-term use of ORAL fluconazole would have serious side
effects in 100% of all cases.

Furthermore, I am convinced that this "parasitical rosacea entity" is at least
partially "hiding" INSIDE damaged human cells, which would require the DMSO as
the "vehicle" to get the fluconazole where it can CURE ALL the rosacea, since
ORAL fluconazole in the bloodstream cannot get inside the human cells. I spoke
of this at:
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/192
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/193

The possible side effects and normal dosages of fluconazole are at:
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/111
There, they state:
"(3) Dermatologic: Patients have rarely developed exfoliative skin disorders
during treatment with DIFLUCAN/fluconazole. In patients with serious underlying
diseases, (predominantly AIDS and malignancy), these have rarely resulted in a
fatal outcome. Patients who develop rashes during treatment with DIFLUCAN should
be monitored closely and the drug discontinued if lesions progress."

These "exfoliative skin disorders" are listed as possible SIDE EFFECTS of ORAL
fluconazole, which confuses this issue even more.
I am convinced that these "exfoliative skin disorders", LABELED AS SIDE EFFECTS,
may very well be the ORAL fluconazole PARTIALLY FIGHTING many types of "stealthy
parasitical skin diseases", (including rosacea).
But my opinion is that the ORAL fluconazole could NEVER CURE these skin
diseases, because they require repetitious, long-term use of the fluconazole,
which would be toxic to the liver, kidneys, and possibly the whole body, even
causing death. Also, only [DMSO + fluconazole] can penetrate inside the human
cells, to kill ALL the disease, while keeping the systemic levels of fluconazole
extremely low.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Please let me know if your statement that "fluconazole has been proven effective
against rosacea in clinical trials" is a mistake. If it's true, it is a
tremendous shock to me.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

As for your question about "seborrhea", I assume you mean "Seborrheic
Dermatitis".
My opinion, is that [DMSO + fluconazole], (I'm not sure what percentage of the
fluconazole would be best), is most likely the best "treatment", (to get rid of
the symptoms), for SD, which apparently has a strong genetic vector. Because of
this genetic vector, we may have to assume that SD cannot be cured at this time,
until we invent some genetic cure.

I don't know.
I do know of one case of a man who told me that the [DMSO + 1% fluconazole] and
the [DMSO + 10% fluconazole] got rid of his SD symptoms, but they returned
within a week or two, as I remember. I spoke of that, at:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/232
Of course, we never know whether what we receive on the Internet is true or not.

If you have very little time, I think my best post on SD was at:
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/sebderm/message/2964
http://www.dermadoctor.com/pages/newsletter66.asp?AID=6024

Here are all the posts I've made, on that SD group board:
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/sebderm/message/3133
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/sebderm/message/2964
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/sebderm/message/2391
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/sebderm/message/2267
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/sebderm/message/2265
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/sebderm/message/2223
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/sebderm/message/2192
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/sebderm/message/2177
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/sebderm/message/2175
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/sebderm/message/2167

So, I hope this helps. I would appreciate your updating me, in the future, of
your results, and especially what your doctor(s) might say, and especially if
your doctor(s) would "go public" with any positive opinions.
Thank you much, for your positive interest and info.
God Bless, ITN & IDFN,
Dave Fleming
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

--- On Sat 07/09, [name deleted]> wrote:
From: [name deleted]
To: fulltruth40@...
Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2005 17:37:44 -0700
Subject: thank you

Dave,
Thank you very much for your response. I've spoken with several MD's who agree
that this treatment makes sense and are willing to prescribe it. I'm uncertain
as to why some have given this such a bad report when fluconazole has been
proven effective against rosacea in clinical trials.
Out of curiosity, do you know how this med acts on seborrhea?
I'm willing to try it and will keep you posted on the results.
Thanks again,
[name deleted]



---------------------------------
  Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

For Everyone,
This post may be a bit off-topic, but I believe it's of interest to rosaceans,
especially if they also have nail fungus, that [DMSO + 10% fluconazole] is the
best cure for nail fungus, hands down, as well as being the only cure for
rosacea.
God Bless, ITN & IDFN,
Dave Fleming ---TEXT OF POST AT [nailfungus] GROUP FOLLOWS---

Dave Fleming wrote:
For the [nailfungus] group, as at:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/nailfungus/

Remember that topically applied [DMSO + fluconazole] concentrates itself in the
nail and surrounding tissue of the toe, and has virtually no chance of any side
effects.  This is because it keeps the systemic level of fluconazole extremely
low, and it is likely that the fluconazole remains "bound together" with the
DMSO, which likely means that it does not have the systemic toxicity of plain
ORAL fluconazole, as explained at:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/193
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/111

Here is a source for finding out the history of "Lamisil/terbinafine".  It's not
pretty, as at:
http://www.adrugrecall.com/lamisil/effects.html
There, they say:
"Lamisil side effects are very dangerous and deadly. The FDA found the Lamisil
side effects to be so dangerous that a public health advisory warning was
issued, in addition to Lamisil labeling changes. The FDA had received reports of
liver failure in Lamisil patients, often leading to death.
There were 16 Lamisil side effects liver failure reports as of April 2001. When
the Lamisil side effects warning was issued, healthcare professionals were sent
letters alerting them of the reports of Lamisil liver failure, transplantation,
and death. Physicians were recommended to take nail specimens for lab testing in
potential Lamisil patients to reduce unnecessary risk of Lamisil side effects."

Also, the cure of nail fungus with [DMSO + 10% fluconazole] takes only six weeks
of daily applications, at most, whereas ORAL Lamisil/terbinafine takes many
months to over a year of taking daily Lamisil/terbinafine ORALLY, the last time
I saw their ad on TV.

I personally believe that it is actually criminal that some doctors continue to
prescribe ORAL anti-fungal nail fungus drugs, with their potential side effects
including permanent liver damage and even DEATH, when the extremely effective
nail fungus cure of TOPICALLY APPLIED, NON-INVASIVE [DMSO + 10% fluconazole]
exists.

There ought'a be a law against prescribing drugs such as Lamisil/terbinafine for
nail fungus, with such potential side effects.
As I remember, the Lamisil TV ad claimed that side effects are "generally mild".
Right....
So, "generally mild", apparently translates as "some people DIE when they take
Lamisil for nail fungus".
Right.... Of course, those Lamisil folks who wrote, "generally mild side
effects" had no rea$on to deceive you, right?
God Bless, ITN & IDFN,
Dave Fleming


---------------------------------
  Sell on Yahoo! Auctions  - No fees. Bid on great items.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

For Everyone,
Here's another question about exact numbers, concerning how many have "tried"
[DMSO + fluconazole], for rosacea.  My estimate is that perhaps 250,000 have
tried this med, worldwide, but my estimate may not be accurate. I have explained
my decisions about reporting all "testimonies" on the [rosacea-cure] board, as
at:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/251
God Bless, ITN & IDFN,
Dave Fleming ----TEXT OF EMAILS FOLLOWS, (in reverse chronological order)----

Dave Fleming wrote:
Hi, [name deleted],
Please carefully read the post about testimonials, at:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/251

I wish I could simply talk freely, about all the testimonies I've received, but
I do not believe that would be wise.
If you apply [DMSO + 10% fluconazole] even one time, you will notice if it
causes a "change" in your rosaceous skin, while not affecting any other healthy
skin on your body you might apply it to.  This should reassure you that you are
on the right track, in curing your rosacea.
I'm sorry that I'm not able to give you the statistics you're asking for at this
time, but that's the nature of a situation where the "status-quo enemy" has the
profits of over SIX BILLION DOLLARS ANNUALLY, to pay for disinformation, or to
fight to suppress the news of this [DMSO + 10% fluconazole] cure.

I will say this much.  As I caution in my "General Directions", at:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/210
, many people stop this treatment/cure, before it is completed, for one reason
or another.  They will just have to continue the [DMSO + 10% fluconzole]
applications later, when they realize that they're only partially cured.
Although it does normally require a lot of patience and PERSISTENCE, it is the
only cure in existence for rosacea, so I believe we should be thankful to God
for it.
Please do keep me updated, concerning your results, and whatever your doctor is
willing to say, publicly, in the future.
God Bless, ITN & IDFN,
Dave Fleming
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

From :  [address deleted]
Sent :  Thursday, June 30, 2005
To :  <fulltruth40@...>
Subject :  rosacea

Dave,
I am willing to give your treatement a chance and have had a doctor prescribe
your recommended treatment for rosacea.  Could you please tell me how many have
tried your treatment and the success rate?
Thanks,
[name deleted]

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

For Everyone,
Well, the USA citizen continues to be victimized increasingly, by our
"government-corporate conglomerate".
Pfizer's Diflucan/fluconazole patent ran out in Jan. 2004, so the price, (to USA
Compounding Pharmacists), of the bulk pure white powder fluconazole has gone
down radically, since it is now being manufactured all over the world.
But there is some higgly-piggly going on, concerning, (as usual), the FDA.   The
FDA has what are called "Compliance Policy Guides", (CPGs), that are used to
"control" Compounding Pharmacists in the USA.
A "CPG" is the sort of "rule" that can be selectively enforced by the FDA, by
going in, (guns drawn), to any Compounding Pharmacy and violating them
arbitrarily.  To do its "job", the CPG has to be vague, and expansive, and this
one is a doozy.

Here is a partial quote, from a current lawsuit against the FDA, at the URL:
http://www.iacprx.org/Litigation.html
"(1)  FDA's compliance policy guide (CPG)...  ...is incorrect in that it states
that compounding from bulk active pharmaceutical ingredients is illegal.
Further, the CPG is unenforceable."

Now, let's get this straight.  The FDA seems to be saying that USA Compounding
Pharmacies cannot have more of any "pharmaceutical ingredients" stored on their
premises, than they are currently actually using to fill prescriptions.
How's that???
In other words, it seems to be saying that a CP has to order from a supplier,
every time they fill a prescription.

Can anyone figure out how such an "FDA Policy" makes any sense, much less could
be justified?  The "shelf life" of fluconazole does not seem to be the problem,
by any means, since it appears to be permanently stable, and the FDA doesn't
even mandate any set "shelf life limit" for fluconazole.

The FDA appears to like keeping things "vague".... with "recommendations" that
function as law, and can be enforced arbitrarily at gunpoint. Please, someone
correct me if I'm incorrect about the FDA.... but this is what CPs are telling
me....

Please email me, if you can explain why the FDA is not being blatantly "crooked"
with this "CPG", and I'll be sure to post it.

Other than to "SNAFU" the CPs, I think I found out why this "CPG" exists,
especially concerning fluconazole, one of the two ingredients in the most
amazing breakthrough cure of two millennia.  Perhaps the FDA is "in cahoots"
with the "middle men" suppliers, because they are the ones who profit the most
from this.  (As "Deep-Throat" so wisely put it, "Follow the money".)

For obvious business reasons, Compounding Pharmacists closely guard the price
they pay for drugs.
But by more than one "miracle", I found out the prices that two suppliers are
currently charging USA CPs, for bulk white powder fluconazole.
The significance of this powder, is that its only ingredient is fluconazole,
whereas the fluconazole tablets or capsules have a list of "excipient"
ingredients as long as your arm, (including red dye #40, on the tablets).
There is a list of the "excipient" capsule ingredients, under "COMPOSITION", at:
http://home.intekom.com/pharm/pfizer/diflu150.html
The tablet "excipient" ingredients are listed at:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/170

Although they are in miniscule amounts, (as is the fluconazole), the effects of
dissolving all these "excipient" ingredients in DMSO for topical application are
not absolutely clear, since we can assume that about 10% of each ingredient will
be transported into the bloodstream by the DMSO.  In any case, we know that
these "excipient" ingredients are certainly not useful or needed, when making
[DMSO + 10% fluconazole].

But I digress.
Upon examination, the suppliers are charging 5.5 to more than 9 TIMES AS MUCH,
for small quantities of bulk fluconazole powder, than for large quantities. 
Here's the breakdown:

Supply Company #1 prices for powder fluconazole:
25 grams costs CPs $125.00
one kilogram costs CPs $900.00

one kilogram = 1,000 grams = 1,000,000 milligrams, (mg)
[DMSO + 10% fluconazole] contains 100 mg per ml of DMSO, so a typical 15 ml Rx
contains 1,500 mg fluconazole.

Supply Company #2 prices for powder fluconazole:
25 grams costs CPs $159.00
100 grams costs CPs $459.00
1 Kilogram costs CPs $695.00

If you do the math, Company #1's price/mg of 25 grams is 5.6 times the price/mg
of one kilogram, (with even the price for one kilogram being substantially
higher).
If you do the math, Company #2's price/mg of 25 grams is 9.2 times the price/mg
of one kilogram.

Since the amount of fluconazole used to fill one [DMSO + 10% fluconazole]
prescription is normally less than 25 grams, does it appear to you that the
owners of the "Supply Companies" must be "good friends" of the FDA, with their
apparently "crooked, illegal, unenforceable" CPGs that force the CPs to
repeatedly buy 25 grams at the suspiciously inflated, absolutely unnatural
price???

So, the good news, is that you can expect that the price of your [DMSO + 10%
fluconazole] Rx will be getting less expensive as time goes on, in the USA.  The
bad news, is that the price is still going to be artificially inflated in the
USA, because of some almost covert, (and certainly devious), manipulation by the
FDA and "middle men" Supply Companies.

Meanwhile, worldwide, [DMSO + fluconazole] is going to most likely become about
as cheap as water, allowing the highest possible percentages of fluconazole to
be used, in the DMSO.

To my knowledge, no one has ever determined how much fluconazole will dissolve
in one ml of DMSO, at room termperature.  Also, no such figure has been
determined for how much fluconaozole will dissolve in [10% water/90% DMSO]. 
Since maximum effectiveness of this med MIGHT be achieved at the highest
percentage possible, we need to determine what that is.

And it's important to note, that I have found that my strong opinion, is that
[DMSO + 10% fluconazole] is more effective than [DMSO + 1% fluconazole].  And I
now believe that [(10% water/90% DMSO) + 10% fluconazole] is more effective,
(and certainly more deeply penetrating), than [DMSO + 10% fluconazole].

The best "off-hand guess" I have obtained, is that (PERHAPS!) no more than 500
mg of fluconazole will dissolve in one milliliter of DMSO, at room temperature.
IF THIS GUESS IS TRUE, it would make [DMSO + 50% fluconazole] the highest
percentage possible.

I'm interested in judiciously trying the highest percentage of fluconazole
possible, in the most penetrating base, [(10% water/90% DMSO) + 50%
fluconazole], because the decrease in the price of fluconazole will make larger
percentages possible for my budget, and I still have a "resistant" recurring
"problem", inside my nose.

It may be that the curative results, using larger amounts of fluconazole in [10%
water/90% DMSO], may be much faster, and have much more profound "whole body
curative effects", than has been possible with the [DMSO + 10% fluconazole].  Of
course, in the case of rosacea, it could be that making this med more effective
might also make us look worse for a few days or so, but the curative speed is
also important.

I'm a bit ignorant about whether it's possible for a USA MD to prescribe some
quantity of the bulk pure white powder fluconazole, so that people could mix it
legally at home with the DSMO, to create different percentages, according to
their wishes concerning the effects.
Certainly, since it's already being done with so many safe drugs, the bulk
powder fluconazole could certainly be prescribed by Internet.

If anyone knows of such an Internet means of obtaining the Rx for the pure
powder fluconazole, PLEASE LET ME KNOW.  It's bound to show up sooner or later. 
:-)

I hope this helps.
God Bless, ITN & IDFN,
Dave Fleming


---------------------------------
Yahoo! Sports
  Rekindle the Rivalries. Sign up for Fantasy Football

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

For Everyone,
Corrected [rosacea-cure] message #267 is being reposted, (as #269), because I
many months ago misread the info in [rosacea-cure] message #170.
For a very long time, I have believed that 25 "GRAMS" of fluconazole will
dissolve in "ONE MILLILITER" of alcohol.
I read it wrong....
Only 25 "MILLIGRAMS" of fluconazole dissolves in "ONE MILLILITER" of alcohol at
room temperature.
The source quoted in r-c message #170 is authoritative: the International
Journal of Pharmaceutical Compounding, vol. 2, No. 4 July/August 1998, page 299
However, even a reliable source HAS TO BE READ CORRECTLY!!!   :-I
So, my extrapolation of this "25 mg/ml alcohol" info to how much fluconazole
will dissolve in DMSO, is MOOT, because [DMSO + 10% fluconazole] is already FOUR
TIMES HIGHER THAN 25 mg, at 100 mg per ml of DMSO.
I'm currently working to find out exactly how much fluconazole will dissolve in
one ml of DMSO, at room temperature.

I believe that this figure has become much more important, with the radical
decrease in the price of fluconazole that has occurred.  And the fact that I
found that the 10% med is more effective than the 1% med, is very important to
this question.
The curative effectiveness may or may not increase at higher than 10%
percentages of fluconazole, but we will never determine this, without trying
higher percentages, (and also trying [10% water/90% DMSO], as the base).

This info is either in some extremely obscure "chart", somewhere, or has NEVER
EVEN BEEN DETERMINED!!!
So I will be trying to determine how much fluconazole will dissolve in one ml of
DMSO at room temperature.
And to make this question even more extensive, we also need to know how much
fluconazole will dissolve in one ml of [10% water/90% DMSO], at room
temperature.

The best "off-hand guess" I have obtained, is that (PERHAPS!) no more than 500
mg of fluconazole will dissolve in one milliliter of DMSO, at room temperature.

IF THIS GUESS IS TRUE, it would make [DMSO + 50% fluconazole] the highest
percentage possible.
So, all my "facts" about this "dissolvability", in [rosacea-cure] message #267,
were not based in fact, but in my misreading of the info in the article posted
at:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/170
, from the International Journal of Pharmaceutical Compounding, vol. 2, No. 4
July/August 1998, page 299

My apology for the mistake, but from such acorn mistakes, mighty, useful oaks
may grow.  :-D

Message #267 will soon be deleted, and is replaced by the corrected message
#269.
God Bless, ITN & IDFN,
Dave Fleming


---------------------------------
Yahoo! Sports
  Rekindle the Rivalries. Sign up for Fantasy Football

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

For Everyone,
More rosaceans than ever before are asking me about this cure for rosacea.  I
have done my best to give a current, comprehensive answer here, to cover all
these enquiries.  As usual, I have removed the ID of "Joe", in order to
guarantee his protection from the kind of "cyber attacks" that are still being
launched against me....
God Bless, ITN & IDFN,
Dave Fleming ---TEXT OF PRIVATE EMAILS FOLLOWS, (in reverse chronological
order)----

Hi Joe,
Thanks for your vote of confidence, concerning the quality of [rosacea-cure]
posts.  Although they do tend to be longer than I would like, I do my best to
not waste anyone's time with the kind of inane or deceptive "chatter" and
obvious, "totally deceptive disguised advertisements" I see on other rosacea
boards.

To begin, perhaps you should read the recent "Advice" r-c post at:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/265
Since this is a complex situation in so many ways, I haven't been able to ever
"condense" this [rosacea-cure] info as much as I would like to.

To answer your question very directly, Joe, I guess my whole point, has been
that EVERYONE who even SUSPECTS that this med even MIGHT help them, should
definitely, without any doubt whatsoever, TRY it.  It is an extremely benign
med, that basically has NO effects, unless it is needed, (especially in the very
small amounts applied topically for this treatment/cure).

There are numerous reasons why just about EVERYONE with any suspect skin
problems, (as well as ocular rosacea and some other problems), should definitely
TRY this med, especially if they use the "General Directions" I posted for your
doctor(s) to approve, at:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/210

Here are (9) "points of interest" that may help you decide to TRY this med:

(1) The effect [DMSO + 10% fluconazole] has on "infested" skin tells us whether
we need it or not, with temporary stinging and/or profound temporary changes in
the appearance of the skin.

(Absolutely NO "blisters", and NO "spontaneous bleeding", are involved in this
cure, but those are the LIES being promoted as recently as 11MAY05, by sick,
merciless "rosacea-profiteers".

They are very willing to cause you to have more irreversible skin damage, just
as long as they can continue to maintain the $tatus-quo of their "ro$acea
profit$".  They have no mercy for you; later, you should be just as mercile$$ to
them, in court$ of law.

Think about it.
These folks are willing to make these absurd "DMSO damage" claims, even though
they KNOW that anyone with even rudimentary knowledge of the full truth about
[DMSO + fluconazole] KNOWS they are lying.  Why are they willing to throw away
whatever good reputation(s) they have, by making such obviously absurd claims?

It's called "BIG BUCKS".
An estimated SIX BILLION DOLLARS in sales annually, (and possibly many, many
BILLIONS OF DOLLARS MORE), will be ENDED by this treatment/cure.  So these folks
obviously feel that they have "nothing to lose", because their reputation$ are
worth nothing anyway, after [DMSO + fluconazole] has cured all these previously
incurable, (and extremely profitable), diseases.

So now you know.
I rarely have felt the need to SPECIFICALLY debunk, (point by point), any of
these truly ridiculous "[DMSO + fluconazole] damage" claims, other than to point
out that they are either totally unsubstantiated, or totally irrelevant, as I
have made crystal clear at:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/244
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/245
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/246
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/248
With two additional pertinent posts at:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/249
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/258

Rosaceans, (especially those with rhinophyma), should bring future lawsuits
against these folks, for the prolongation of suffering they are causing.  And
those with other diseases curable with [DMSO + fluconazole] should also bring
such lawsuits.

Healthy skin is virtually totally unaffected by this med.
Contrary to the lies that "rosacea-profiteers" have been promoting, the eyes are
also totally safe, when this med is applied topically to the face and even
inside the nose and mouth.  Obviously, doctors are prescribing [DMSO + 10%
fluconazole] for rosacea, and if there were any conceivable way for the systemic
DMSO to cause any "corneal damage", it would not be prescribed.
"Rosacea-profiteers" are obviously aiming their lies about this AT THOSE
DOCTORS, (as well as at innocent rosaceans), who might be totally ignorant of
the full truth about DMSO, to try to "scare" them, into NOT writing this [DMSO +
10% fluconazole] prescription.

But doctors who know the full truth continue to write these prescriptions,
ABSOLUTELY PROVING "by default" that these "scare tactic" claims are TOTALLY
FALSE, and are in fact intended to extend the "profit time" of
"rosacea-profiteers".

After all, each year they can delay this cure from "going wide", another SIX
BILLION DOLLARS in sales goes into their pockets.  That's an estimated
$16,438,356.00 per EACH DAY of delay they can cause.    Of course, each
"rosacea-profiteer" sells far less than $16 million a day, but that's the trough
they dip their snouts in, EVERY SINGLE DAY.  :-(

Furthermore, the same identical, stale, lame, unsubstantiated FALSE claims have
been made since SEPTEMBER 2004!!! And that was after SIXTEEN MONTHS of
SUPPRESSIVE SILENCE, on the [rosacea-support] board, (from MAY 2003 to SEPT.
2004). My guess, is that they finally started to see their "rosacea profits"
going down, down, down, by SEPT. 2004.

If there were even a shred of truth to this absurd claim of "damage by [DMSO +
fluconazole]", don't you think some NEW claim(s) would have been made, IN THE
LAST EIGHT MONTHS, since this false slur claim was first put on the
[rosacea-support] and [rosaceans] boards by PASCOE, NASE, BARROWS, ET AL???  And
of course, they have never allowed any truth from me, (or from anyone),
debunking these absurd claims, to post at [rosacea-support] or [rosaceans].

But every day that passes, more and more USA doctors are prescribing [DMSO +
fluconazole], for rosacea, and for many other diseases.  :-D

And absolutely disproving these lies about "DMSO eye damage", doctors have, (for
at least the last couple of years!!!), even been prescribing EYE DROPS with
6.25% DMSO content plus other ingredients, to prevent/treat/cure cataracts of
the eyes, especially in the elderly.
I look forward to EYE DROPS being formulated with DMSO and fluconazole, and
prescribed specifically for OCULAR ROSACEA, to be used IN ADDITION to [DMSO +
10% fluconazole] applied topically on the face.

(2)  Amazingly, NO "diagnosis" is needed.
You don't even have to know what "disease" you have, to be cured with [DMSO +
10% fluconazole].  From my experience, many of the diseases curable with this
med don't even have a specific name, except that they are habitually all
arbitrarily given "one name" by "white coats" who refuse to admit that they
don't actually have the foggiest notion, of what the ROOT CAUSE(S) of these
diseases, (such as rosacea), might be.

A recent post by a SEEMINGLY amiable/helpful "rosacea-profiteer" is emphasizing
that "rosacea" is actually a "range" of different diseases.  Duhh!   Is he just
trying to deceptively justify his continuing, long-term refusal to advocate that
all rosaceans should TRY [DMSO + 10% fluconazole]?  He knows that if they try
it, he will lose his "rosacea-business" overnight.  So you should ask yourself,
"Does he want to deceive rosaceans, to stop them from TRYING this med, so that
he can continue to make money from rosacea?"

To delay/stop the establishment of this treatment/cure, we would expect that
"rosacea-profiteers" would be very crafty, and attempt to mask their betrayal of
rosaceans with whatever "smoke screens", "scare tactics", and general deceptions
they can produce.

You should not make the mistake of believing any ongoing deceptive, selfish
silence and denial, concerning the revolutionary curative reality of [DMSO + 10%
fluconazole].... And contrary to the continuing "rosacea profiteer"
screaming/claim(s) you might hear, absolutely NO "general rosacea research" is
necessary for this med to cure 100% of all rosacea.

Brady Lee Barrows claims that any money you "donate" to his "ro$acea re$earch"
will not benefit him in any way.... Right.... And if you believe that, there's a
bridge in Manhattan I'd like to sell you....

(3)  Since this med has been curing a wide range of different types of
"infestations" that have been previously incurable since time immemorial, it is
only wise to TRY it.  It's hard to establish "absolute proof" of these cures,
but I think that Dr. Syrokomsky's work might be entirely honest, and might very
well be a good example of [DMSO + fluconazole] use.

My most "informative" post on Dr. Syrokomsky is at:
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/262
And the rest of the Dr. Syrokomsky posts, (and his website), follow:
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/258
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/260
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/261
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/264
http://www.dr.syrokomsky.com
http://www.dr.syrokomsky.com/eng-page31.html
http://www.dr.syrokomsky.com/eng-page313.html
http://www.dr.syrokomsky.com/eng-page314.html
http://www.dr.syrokomsky.com/eng-page315.html
http://www.dr.syrokomsky.com/eng-page5.html

I recently repeatedly asked Brady Lee Barrows in about five different private
emails to have the common courtesy to give me his "best opinion", of Dr.
Syrokomsky's cure(s), which are proven by the photo evidence the doctor has
posted at his website, evidently for at least the last four years.
Mr. Barrows slyly refused, and each time stated, "I don't know".  Although Mr.
Barrows admitted that he's been aware of Dr. Syrokomsky's cure claims photo
evidence since 2001, (and linked it to his website, to help Mr. Barrows make
money), he pointedly refused all five times to state any opinion to me about
this doctor's cures.  Mr. Barrows' dogged repetition of his "I don't know"
speaks volumes, amounting to the classic "no comment" dodge we've all heard....

Mr. Barrows also made it clear that, (for four years!!!), he's never even tried
to find out how Dr. Syrokomsky is curing rosacea --- How strange, since Mr.
Barrows always claims that he wants so much to help rosaceans.  Hmmmmmm.
It is becoming more and more obvious to me, that Mr. Brady Lee Barrows doesn't
WANT to know, if a cure for rosacea does exist, except that he wants to use it
to cure himself, of course....

(4)  The "infestations" causing rosacea may cause some irreversible damage to
our skin that [DMSO + 10% fluconazole] does not restore, even though the skin is
obviously healthy after this cure.  So the longer we delay "killing" this
"rosacea causing entity" with [DMSO + 10% fluconazole], the more irreversible
damage will be done to our skin.

"Rosacea-profiteers" who have deceptively misled rosaceans to NOT TRY [DMSO +
fluconazole] should be brought into courts of law at some future time, in order
to ask the classic question, "What did they know, and when did they know it?". 
The answer to this question should determine their prison sentence, or at the
very least, how much they should pay for the prolongation of suffering, (even
including suicides), they have caused.

(5)  In much, (and it appears MOST of the world), this med, (or the easily mixed
two ingredients), is available without any prescription being required, which
pretty much proves that it is quite benign, (although it can have some temporary
unsightly "positive, long-term-healing reactions", ONLY on diseased skin).

This unsightly temporary "curative pinkness and peeling skin" is certainly MUCH
less problematic than the unsightliness caused by many of the so-called
"treatments/controls",

[including the so-called "bruising", (i.e. BURNS), of laser/IPL],

that are currently considered to be perfectly acceptable by the
"$$$ medical community $$$".  But these "approved treatments/controls" always
somehow guarantee that
you will have to come back in the future, to spend
more of your money.

[DMSO + 10% fluconazole], on the other hand, appears to be getting rid of the
ROOT CAUSE of these diseases, even though it is not an "overnight"
treatment/cure.

(6)  By USA standards, at least, this med is cheap.  And it promises to get even
more inexpensive, as time goes on, especially in those parts of the world where
it is legal to mix this med up at home, as explained at:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/170
A few milliliters of DMSO cost practically nothing.
And Pfizer's patent on Diflucan/fluconazole ended over a year ago, so scores of
worldwide manufacturers/suppliers of high-quality generic fluconazole are now
competing to supply fluconazole much more cheaply than ever before.... :-D

(7)  According to proven past studies, we know that about 10% or less of this
med passes through the skin and enters our bloodstream.  I have spoken
personally with Dr. Stanley Jacob, MD, about the specific, proven reality of
this "less than 10% systemic transport" figure of (under 3,000 atomic weight
molecule) substances mixed with DMSO and applied to the skin topically.

That means that this med has a "whole body effect" potential, that may very well
cure "stealthy infestations" that we are not even aware that we have.  I spoke
about this some, at:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/193

When I first applied [DMSO + 1% fluconazole] to my big toes, (for nail fungus),
I felt some very mild "sensations" in my eyes, and I later, (about 18 months
later!), came to realize that the extremely small amount of this med that
entered my bloodstream through my toes, was curing rudimentary ocular rosacea
that I didn't even know that I had.  These eye "sensations" stopped occurring
very soon thereafter, (because my ocular rosacea was cured?), no matter how much
med I was applying to my face.

Another "theory" that I've been led to, is that the "intestinal polyps" that are
known to "develop" into colon cancer, MIGHT also be "stopped/disarmed" by the
[DMSO + fluconazole] that enters our bloodstream when we apply this med only to
our face.

(8)  You say,
>"My rosacea really seems to come on when my body is stressed,
>like it is a total body problem not my just facial skin."

Since there are some hard to prove "biological cascade effects" involving our
immune systems that appear to be involved, the SYMPTOMS of these skin diseases,
(i.e. rosacea), can be quite impossible to "pin down".  Since our immune system
appears to be involved in fairly complex ways, (both in our disease, and in this
cure), fluctuations in our body's "biological balance" can cause the VISIBLE,
EXTERNAL SYMPTOMS to fool us.  But this med clearly appears to be cutting
through all that, and "attacking" the ROOT CAUSE of these skin diseases.

I tried to explain my "theory" about some of this, at:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/225
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/232

(9)  Although I have only "anecdotal evidence" for my "theory" about this, that
does not mean there is anything unsound about this "theory".  It is sound, and
even common sense leads us to believe this "theory" is most likely correct.

And in any case, this med is curative, even if my "theory" is incorrect, about
how it is doing the curing.

In fact, it is quite possible that we might NEVER know, (or need to know), how
this med works, even after it has cured 100% of all rosacea.

That's why it is such a LIE, to claim that "general rosacea research is needed"
NOW.
Of course, "rosacea-profiteers" would naturally be motivated to do "rosacea
research", if a cure for rosacea appeared.  That's the only way they could
"muddy the water" and most effectively try to stop rosaceans from discovering
that new cure for rosacea.

So if you wonder why all the CURRENT screaming for "rosacea research" is being
put out by groups, (owned by "rosacea-profiteers"), that have existed for many,
many years WITHOUT that screaming, now you know; look around for a cure, because
that would explain why they are screaming for this "cover-up rosacea research"
NOW.

And you should try [DMSO + 10% fluconazole] first, to save time in your search
for that cure.  :-D

I sure do hope this helps.  :-)
God Bless, ITN & IDFN,
Dave Fleming
x==x==x==x==x==x==x==x==x==x==x==x

From: "Joe"
To: fulltruth40@...
Date: Mon, 16 May 2005
Subject: Great Posts

Hello Dave,
Thank you for the great posts.  I have been suffering with rosacea for
about two years now and it seems to be getting worse.
I am on ovace, metro and antibiotics, they dont work very well.
I really want to try [DMSO + 10% fluconazole, but I'm not sure it is for me.
My rosacea really seems to come on when my body is stressed,
like it is a total body problem not my just facial skin.
When I am tired it is really bad or when I am anxious or embarrassed.
The sun makes me really red or heat.
Only recently have I been waking up with a redish color, it is really
disheartening.
I really dont have to bad of bumps yet.  I guess what I
am wondering is should I give this a try.
Any info would be much appreciated
Thanks
Joe


---------------------------------
Discover Yahoo!
  Find restaurants, movies, travel & more fun for the weekend. Check it out!

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

For Everyone,
Below is the private email exchange between a recently diagnosed rosacean and
myself.  As usual, we can not be totally sure that this email is completely
honest, since it could be from liars who are desperate to create any means of
accusing me, so that Yahoo! might have some reason to delete this [rosacea-cure]
group.

But I have taken the time to answer, because thousands  of "new rosaceans" are
diagnosed every day, and they need this [DMSO + 10% fluconazole] more than they
may realize.
Using only the medically established stop-gap "treatments/controls" on rosacea
only means that the disease will progress and cause more and more permanent
damage to the skin, before it is cured with [DMSO + 10% fluconazole].
As usual, I have disguised her ID, to protect her from any possible
"cyber-attack", etc. by "rosacea profiteers".

For [rosacea-cure] members, there isn't much new here, but I do clarify more
completely for the first time on this board, (in my last few paragraphs, below),
why we should despise the "scare tactics" and "delay tactics" being used by
"rosacea profiteers", in their continuing merciless attempts to maintain their
"ro$acea profit$".

"Ro$acea-profiteer-re$earch" is the most recent manifestation of these sick
attempts to slow/stop the establishment of this [DMSO + 10% fluconazole]
treatment/cure for rosacea, and for many other diseases.
And may God have mercy on their souls....
God Bless, ITN & IDFN,
Dave Fleming ---TEXT OF EMAILS FOLLOWS, (in reverse chronological order) ----

Dave Fleming wrote:
Hi, Sienna,
First, I have to refer you to the [rosacea-cure] Home Page, at:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/
There is some "homework" listed there for you.  You really should read the
messages I recommend there, although it does take some time.  Here are the
message numbers:
Most important, are messages #2, #18, #64, #170, #210, #261 and #264.
Also important, are messages #163, #187 thru #193, #197 thru #207, and 263.
Just plug the number of each message into the end of this URL:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/2
Of course, there are many other messages that you might want to read, such as
#225, and #232, at:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/225
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/232

I assume you are in the USA.
Part of your "research" should include talking to the COMPOUNDING Pharmacists in
your area, (or anywhere, since they can easily ship the med to you).  The
reference URL for CPs is at:
http://www.iacprx.org/referral_service/index.html
It's also shown near the bottom of the r-c Home Page.

Get it very clear with your CP first, exactly what you want, and exactly how
well they can provide it.  They really should contact Michael Roberge, RPh, if
they have any question.  His website is at:
http://compoundedsolutions.com

Once you've clarified everything with your CP, you've done more than half the
"work".  You have to be willing to go looking for the doctor who will give you
this [DMSO + 10% fluconazole] Rx, if your own doctor refuses for any reason.
One source of doctors' names, would of course be the Compounding Pharmacists you
speak with.  They might be able to give you the names of doctors who have enough
care and knowledge to help you with this Rx.
Any reasonable doctor should allow you to at least TRY this med, by even
applying it only ONE TIME, to see for yourself what you think of its long-term
effects.  Believe it or not, in the triune relationship of the patient, the
doctor, and the CP, it is the patient who is in charge, not the doctor.  Of
course, if you as the patient do not know this, the doctor may in many cases be
willing to bully you.  But the final word is which doctor you will pay, so you
are the one in charge.

Since this is far from being a "perfect" cure, and is certainly not an
"overnight" cure, I'm concerned that you say you, "long for the clear unred
porcelain skin I used to have".

Although my confidence is extremely high that this topically applied med will
cure 100% of all rosacea, I do not believe that we will look exactly as we did
before we had the rosacea.  In many cases, I believe at least some of the
"damage" done by the rosacea may be left in the healthy, non-rosaceous skin
AFTER this cure.

I believe that dermatologists may know many ways to minimize this "damage",
AFTER the [DMSO + 10% fluconazole] cures the rosacea, but such measures
attempted on rosaceous skin can make a real mess, in my opinion, and from what
I've read.
As long as no cure for rosacea has existed, such "messes" were acceptable to the
medical community, although not to the rosaceans.

I compare the situation to the time when the only acceptable "cure" for a bad
infection in an arm or leg, was to amputate the limb.  But once penicillin was
discovered, such amputations by definition became "ignorant butchery", because
the limb could have been saved.  That's why I believe that "treating"
rhinophyma, (the final stage of this horrendous progressive rosacea), with
laser/IPL is "ignorant butchery", since [DMSO + 10% fluconazole] can now get rid
of the "rosacea causing entity".

Since this med appears to somehow be "attacking" the ROOT CAUSE of rosacea, it
certainly qualifies as the only known cure for rosacea, but as you no doubt
know, every rosacean is different, SO THE MAIN MESSAGE YOU SHOULD PRINT OUT FOR
YOUR DOCTOR TO APPROVE WOULD BE #210, which makes it clear that each rosacean
can take this cure at their own "rate", as at:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/210

One of the good points that I like about this med, is that it tells you when you
apply it, whether it is "working" for you, if there is some stinging.  If you
apply it to non-rosaceous skin, it has virtually no effect.
I may be wrong, but I do not believe that this med cures common acne, (i.e. acne
vulgaris), or SD, but I believe it may significantly improve those symptoms.

You have not given me your age, but according to my "theory", you have most
likely had the "rosacea causing entity" growing in your skin for many, many
years, before rosacea symptoms have begun to show up.  So I definitely do not
believe that you "just got it", even though you were just diagnosed.

Part of my "theory", is that some of the "damage" already done by the rosacea
does not necessarily show before our cure, because the gross symptoms of the
rosacea make this "damage" hard to identify, until our skin becomes more
obviously healthy, after we have "killed" the "rosacea causing entity".

So a very important corollary of my "theory", is that rosaceans who continue to
believe the ignorant, (and/or money-hungry), doctors/researchers, etc, who say
there is no cure, will make the mistake of accepting "treatments for symptoms"
that allow the rosacea to continue to progress and do more damage.  Finally, at
some point in the future, the rosacean will hopefully fight for and get [DMSO +
10% fluconazole], and finally stop the "rosacea causing entity" in its tracks.

But the longer the delay, the more "irreversible damage" will be done to that
rosacean's skin, until they use the [DMSO + 10% fluconazole].  I have come to
this conclusion through my extensive personal experience with this med, as well
as all I've learned in the two years since I started this free [rosacea-cure]
Yahoo! group.

This situation is one reason I get so disgusted with the "$tatu$-quo ro$acea
profiteer$", who are doing everything they can to muddy the water and discredit
this [DMSO + 10% fluconazole] treatment/cure.  Every day of delay they cause,
for hundreds of millions of rosaceans, is causing rosacea-induced skin damage
that cannot ever be completely undone, even with [DMSO + 10% fluconazole].

It is a sad reality, that two years of this type of delay have taken place,
since I first put this discovery on the Internet, and these "rosacea-profiteers"
show no sign of any mercy, but are instead gearing up to produce
"rosacea-profiteer-research" aimed at distracting from or deceptively
discrediting this [DMSO + 10% fluconazole] treatment/cure.
So, Sienna, I hope this info helps you, and any other newly diagnosed rosaceans
who might read this on the [rosacea-cure] board in the future.
God Bless, ITN & IDFN,
Dave Fleming
X=X=X=X=X=X=X=X=X=X=X=X=X=X=X=X=X=X

Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2005
From:  Sienna
To: "Dave Fleming" <fulltruth40@...>
Subject: rosacea treatment
Hi Dave !
My name is Sienna and I have just recently been diagnosed
with rosacea.
I am very interested to know the exact cure you describe
on your page.
It all sounds interesting and gives me some hope as I
long for the clear unred porcelain skin I used to have.
Every time I look in the mirror I want to cry.
I would like to know what exactly you have to do to get the
two topical agents you mention and how and when and how
often to apply it.
I am so hoping that what you say about it curing rosacea is
really true as it would improve my self confidence drastically.
Please write back to me as soon as you can as I have an
appointment with my doctor next week and would like to bring
my research to him.
Thank You

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

For Everyone,
Wow! The plot thickens!  Is Dr. Syrokomsky's website truthful?  As at:
http://www.dr.syrokomsky.com
http://www.dr.syrokomsky.com/eng-page31.html
http://www.dr.syrokomsky.com/eng-page313.html
http://www.dr.syrokomsky.com/eng-page314.html
http://www.dr.syrokomsky.com/eng-page315.html
http://www.dr.syrokomsky.com/eng-page5.html

And if it is, is he using [DMSO + fluconazole]?  The answer appears to be "Yes",
in both cases, as I believe in my posts about this, at:
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/260
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/261

If Dr. Syrokomsky's cure is a "deception", why would he use the words, "pain,
burning, redness, and skin peeling" to describe it?  And why would he state
plainly, that a MINIMUM of 4 months of treatment is necessary, (with some of his
photo-evidence showing that the complete cure required two years)?

Most importantly, what possible "other cure" would cause all these unusual,
long-term effects that are IDENTICAL to this [DMSO + fluconazole] cure I have
been describing on the [rosacea-cure] board since May 2003?

The requirements of this cure are far too inconvenient, to be a "deception". 
And remember, [DMSO + 10% fluconazole] has virtually NO EFFECT on healthy skin,
even on the face!!!
Even Brady Barrows, (who does not apologize for his ethical goal of profiting
from helping rosaceans "control" this horrendous disease), noted this, on "Day
Fifty Six June 13" 2004, of his "DMSO Fluconazole" diary, as at:
http://www.rosacea-control.com/html/diary2.html
He stated, "...but if I apply the medication to non-rosacea facial skin or any
other non-rosacea skin there is no stinging."  Brady explains that this is a
very impressive proof that this med is somehow healing rosacea, no matter what
is causing the rosacea.  As he puts it, "Now what would you conclude that if you
apply this medication to rosacea it stings and when you apply it to non-rosacea
skin it doesn't sting? Do the math."

I think it is also significant that Dr. Syrokomsky works in the Ukraine, where I
assume that the [USA Medical Malpractice Insurance + Big Pharma + Big Laser/IPL]
juggernaut may be powerless to stop him from curing rosacea and many other skin
diseases with [DMSO + fluconazole].

The only present question I have, concerns the "timing" of Dr. Syrokomsky's
presently, (i.e. April 2005), posted photo-evidence of cures.  The below listed
r-s posts seem to establish that his "cure-claims" were established by 2001. 
But the present most spectacular photo-evidence is mostly for only two years.
But this is not too hard to "understand".
It took me 18 months from my first use of [DMSO + fluconazole], to even post my
findings on the Internet, (i.e. from Oct.-Nov. 2001, to April 2003).

In the USA, the prescription [DMSO + 1% fluconazole] was first "invented", (to
cure nail fungus), in late 1998.  So it makes sense, that a really savvy
dermatologist might have been trying [DMSO + fluconazole] on skin diseases even
before 2001.

This would mean that I was not the first person to discover this [DMSO +
fluconazole] treatment/cure for rosacea.

The fact that David Pascoe discredited Dr. Syrokomsky on the [rosacea-support]
board, (without any proof), has to surprise us all, since we know that Pascoe
and Nase would never suppress any cure for rosacea, and thereby sacrifice
rosaceans for profit....

We wait in great anticipation for the "cure for rosacea" from Geoffrey Nase's
RRF, which promises us great "rosacea-research" by Geoffrey, who has made a
career out of "rosacea-research" for so many years.  We have to ask, what will
Geoffrey do, once he has discovered "the cure for rosacea", and loses all his
income from selling his "rosacea book", et cetera, et cetera, et cetera?

But I digress.
I was led to go to the [rosacea-support] Home Page, click on "escribe", and
Search the escribe r-s archives for "syrokomsky".
What a surprise!  I found 13 "hits", and they all speak of Dr. Nikolai
Syrokomsky!
It looks like David Pascoe chose to discredit Dr. Syrokomsky, (without proof),
and the last post was from someone who was going to see Dr. Syrokomsky, to be
cured, in Sept. 2004.
Surprise, surprise, surprise - D. Pascoe's r-s Moderators have never posted
another message on Dr. Syrokomsky, since Sept. 2004....

Verrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrry In-ter-res-ting!

Here's the list of those r-s posts.  You need not bother to read them though. 
As we might expect, no cure for rosacea has ever been promoted on the
[rosacea-support] board.  BTW, does David Pascoe make any profit from his
ownership of and work in the [rosacea-support] group?   I've never seen him
write about "ro$acea profit$"....
I hope this helps.
God Bless, ITN & IDFN,
Dave Fleming --- LIST OF 13 "syrokomsky" POSTS FOLLOWS ------
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://escribe.com/health/rosacea-support/m21663.html   14FEB01
"This is a treatment at home and the procedures are external. ...My practice is
situated in Zhitomir-city, Ukraine (1,5 hours by car from capital Kiev)."
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://escribe.com/health/rosacea-support/m21664.html   14FEB01
http://escribe.com/health/rosacea-support/m21665.html   14FEB01
http://escribe.com/health/rosacea-support/m21668.html   14FEB01
http://escribe.com/health/rosacea-support/m21671.html   14FEB01
http://escribe.com/health/rosacea-support/m29681.html   06NOV01
http://escribe.com/health/rosacea-support/m29687.html   06NOV01
http://escribe.com/health/rosacea-support/m29696.html   07NOV01
http://escribe.com/health/rosacea-support/m29703.html   07NOV01
http://escribe.com/health/rosacea-support/m55929.html   23JUN04
http://escribe.com/health/rosacea-support/m55940.html   23JUN04
http://escribe.com/health/rosacea-support/m56840.html   28AUG04
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
THE FOLLOWING WAS THE LAST POST ON DR. SYROKOMSKY ALLOWED BY DAVID PASCOE, as of
April 2005.  Someone states that their relative was cured by Dr. Syrokomsky, and
they're going to visit the good doctor for treatment in late 2004.  Evidently,
no further positive word on Dr. Syrokomsky has been posted on the
[rosacea-support] board, by David Pascoe's "Moderators".  Why am I not
surprised?... :-)
http://escribe.com/health/rosacea-support/m56945.html   02SEP04
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
  Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site!

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

For Everyone,
The following is some recent private email with a person who says he has been a
Registered Nurse for many years.  He's always been very positive about this
treatment/cure, and has had enough medical knowledge to see through the lame
claims and gross disinformation being put out about DMSO, and about this
treatment/cure, by peanut-gallery liars.
I hope this helps.
God Bless, ITN & IDFN,
Dave Fleming ----TEXT OF EMAILS FOLLOWS, (in reverse chronological order)----

Dave Fleming wrote:
Hi, David,
It's good to hear from you, since you've always been so positive and helpful.  I
do remember our past private email.
Thank you for your update, of your situation.
Am sorry to hear of your problem(s), and as you no doubt know, since you have
worked in the health field for so long, I have to refer you to your doctor.
Is there any chance that you could send me
any info on his opinion(s), in this matter?
This would be most helpful to all the rosaceans
who will use this med in the future, since
I'm trying to compile that sort of authoritative
"doctors' opinions", for that purpose.

To some degree, as you know, we are in "uncharted territory" here.  Although we
have all the data from the FDA approval of these two "drugs", (i.e. DMSO and
fluconazole/Diflucan), we do seem to be dealing with a complex situation,
especially since it involves the human face, and all the psychological
ramifications that that implies.
In other words, if your "problem" were on some part of your body concealed by
clothing, you would most likely never be concerned enough to send me your
present question(s).

With all that as preface, what do we know?
1) This med, (either 1% or 10%), has virtually no effect on "healthy" skin.

2) This med, (both 1% and 10%), appears to deeply "attack" rosaceous skin, with
subsequent "cascade effects" and healing to a state that is improved from the
"original disease state".

3) There seems to be some sort of cascade "immunological response" effect
involved/caused/triggered by this med, (both the 1% and the 10%), which causes
the "effects" of the med application to go on for much longer time periods than
one would expect from the direct effect(s) of the med alone; this time period
certainly lasts at least one month, and may go on for months, before the
"healing" is completed, (from that one application of the med).
It seems to me that new, healthy skin has to "grow" from underneath, replacing
and "pushing up" all the skin with the "dead rosacea causing entity" in it.  As
this slow growth occurs, "symptoms" seem to be caused, by the very gradual
"sloughing off" of the old skin containing the "dead rosacea causing entity".

(4)  To make matters much more complicated, each subsequent application of the
med appears to "kill" more of the "rosacea causing entity", layer, by layer, by
layer, until the skin is returned to a healthy, non-rosaceous condition.  I
believe that the "rosacea causing entity" may "hide" in the sinus cavities in
the face, which cannot be reached by any medication in the blood, but is
penetrated and reached by the [DMSO + 10% fluconazole].

So what am I led to offer you, as my opinion in your situation?
Well, David, I admit that I am sort of like a "bulldog" in this matter, and I'm
inclined to offer "excuses" for this "treatment/cure", (since it is a cure, in
my opinion).

In that vein, my first thought, is that you seem to be using this med as a
"treatment", and you are watching the "symptoms", rather than the "disease". 
Let's refer to my "General Directions" as at:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/210
I state that you should wait from ONE TO FOUR WEEKS, between applications of the
med.  I could have easily made that from ONE TO TWO MONTHS, to be more
conservative, but I leave it to each rosacean, to know what level of "effects"
they are willing/able to deal with.

You have chosen the lesser limit of one week between med applications, for a
long, long, long time.  This may have "built up" effects of this healing process
that need more time than you are giving them, to be "completed", before you
apply more med every week.
I also recommend that ideally, multiple applications of the med be applied at
one time, with a long "waiting" period for healing, between, with no med
applications.  In other words, it takes at least 10 or 15 minutes for an
application of the med to be absorbed, so several applications would have to
take at least an hour or two, to apply; then more than a month of "waiting"
might be needed, to assess the healing effects of this multiple application of
the med.

It appears that you have never tried that, so I guess that that is what I might
recommend for you to try, with your doctor's advice and consent.  But FIRST, you
might want to WAIT ONE OR TWO MONTHS, without any med applications, to try to
assess whether your "problems" improve, WITHOUT ANY APPLICATION OF THE MED.

Your SD may complicate the matter, but don't ask me about that, because this
"bulldog" is inclined to believe that [DMSO + fluconazole] may very likely be
the best "treatment" for SD!!!

I admit that this "waiting" can take an "infinite" amount of patience,
especially if you are fighting other symptoms as well, such as those from SD,
Acne Vulgaris, etc.

Another very important aspect of my "bulldog" attitude about this, is that I
know that certain types of "damage", (which was caused by the rosacea but did
not completely "show", before getting rid of the rosacea), may remain, AFTER
this treatment/cure is COMPLETED.  In my case, it has been a couple of minor
purple veins left on the left side of my nose, but I have received just a couple
of "complaints/statements" that there might be "pinkness" left, AFTER this CURE.

I believe that most rosaceans cured by [DMSO + 10% fluconazole] will NOT have
any significant problem with "damage" such as "veins" or "pinkness" left in
healthy skin, but I mention this here as a worst-scenario coverage.

Now how in the world can I claim that rosacea, which is known as a "pinkness" of
the skin, has been cured, if the skin is "pink", AFTER the rosacea is cured??? 
Well, it's simple to me, because I believe that it is self-evident and obvious
that any "pinkness" left AFTER [DMSO + 10% fluconazole] has "killed" the ROOT
CAUSE of the rosacea, would be in the same "category" as the minor purple veins
on my nose, (sort of as "scars/damage" left by the rosacea's years, and even
decades of "damage" done).

My conclusion, is that these "scars" can only be "treated" successfully, AFTER
the rosacea has FIRST been cured by the lengthy applications of [DMSO + 10%
fluconazole].  I'm not a dermatologist, but even the laser/IPL that I think of
as the most primitive, horrific "butchery", when it is used on
rosacea/rhinophyma, MIGHT be appropriate when dealing with strictly "cosmetic"
problems, of healthy skin.
Or dermatologists may know many other means of decreasing the appearance of
purple veins such as mine, or the "pinkness" of healthy skin.

So, to sum up, David, you should listen to me ONLY with your doctor's advice and
consent.
I believe you have simply underestimated the longer-lasting effects of the 10%
med, as compared to the 1% med.
Also, I believe that you have not recognized that some of your "symptoms" may
actually be caused by the "sloughing off" of already "dead rosaceous skin".
For one example, the "itching" you mention may be what I call a "healing itch",
which is caused by the growth of new healthy skin, and is a "positive" itch,
like that under a scab that is healing.  It may annoy you, but in my opinion it
is not the same "negative" character as is a different, non-healing "irritation
itch".

For another example, I had small "bumps" on my forehead, (and some on my
cheeks), which I now believe were not "disease symptoms" but were part of this
"sloughing off" process, which can take at least one month, (OR MORE), to be
"finished".  In most cases, the "bumps" were not inflamed in any way, so they
could not technically be called "papules".
Seeing this, we are tempted to apply more med, but in fact we may be better off
waiting for all of the effects of our last application of the med to be
"completed", before applying more med.

When all is said and done, if this "rosacea" were on some part of our body
concealed by clothing, we'd just keep piling on the med, and that would be OK. 
The cure would be accomplished, perhaps sooner, (or perhaps not, since cascade
effects which take time seem to be involved).  But to minimize "unsightliness",
we need to wait to fully allow the benefits from one (multiple) application of
the med, before we apply it again.  "Dryness", "bumps", "healing itches", and
other "effects" of this healing may be mistaken for "disease symptoms", tempting
us to apply the med more often than is best, for the optimum daily "appearance"
of our face.

There is also another aspect of this situation, involving the non-curative
anti-inflammation characteristic of the DMSO, which I posted at:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/225
You might consider studying this post carefully, to decide how it might also
apply to your situation.

We also have to really resist the temptation to "pick at" or "scratch" the kind
of "dry skin bumps" and itching, peeling skin that may occur.  ALSO, I STILL
BELIEVE THAT THE "CREME" THAT I RECOMMEND IN MY "DIRECTIONS" SHOULD BE USED, TO
"BLEND IN" THE PEELING SKIN, AND TO SOOTH THE SKIN, DURING THE RATHER LONG
HEALING PROCESS.  THIS "CREME" IS MENTIONED, IN r-c message #210.

PERHAPS/MAYBE other types of "cremes" would also accomplish this job, such as
those being marketed by Brady Barrows, in his "Diary" of his use of this med. 
He says a lot of good things about the healing effects he experienced with this
med, even though he finally states that it did not "cure" his rosacea.  Call me
a cock-eyed optimist, but I still hope that Brady will "come to his God's
full-truth senses" in the future, and state the full truth clearly, about this
[DMSO + 10% fluconazole] treatment/CURE.   His "Diary", (and his link to rather
ambiguous, positively smiling self-photos), are at:
http://www.rosacea-control.com/html/diary2.html

So, I think that your "mind-set" has been more on "symptoms", than on curing the
disease.
You are not alone in this tendency.
I cautioned Brady Barrows in private email, because I could see that he was
misinterpreting the effects of the med, and applying it too often, (as in r-c
message #225).
For another example, I stopped applying the med too soon, and found months later
that there was still some stinging upon application of the med, even though I
did not have rosacea symptoms.  And I especially point out this reality, at the
end of my "Directions" in r-c message #210.
And there appears to be a wide "spectrum" of TYPES of "infestation", with some
more resistant to this med than others.  I have found that the most serious,
such as rhinophyma, appear to be most quickly cured by this med.  Some types of
"infestations", which occur on parts of the body other than the face, seem to be
very "stealthy", being almost undetectable until this med is applied, and more
resistant to a complete cure, even though they are 95% "killed" by this med;
perhaps with months of daily treatment, they may be finally cured 100%.

There is a little more info I can offer you.
A higher concentration of this med has become available, but I don't know if it
is better or not.  From Michael Roberge, RPh, it is [DMSO + 50% fluconazole],
which costs $277.00 for 15 ml.  At some future time, I intend to try it on the
inside of my nose, if the "infestation" does not improve with my current, very
seldom treatment using the 10% med on Q-tips.

Perhaps more importantly, I have done some "research" on my own.  Since 1998
when this med was first prescribed, it was made with a 100% concentration of
DMSO, (which is normally labeled as 99% DMSO, because DMSO absorbs some water
from the humidity in the air).
I have known since about June 2003, that a 90% concentration of DMSO, (i.e. 10%
water/90% DMSO), is the most efficient "transporter" of substances into the
bloodstream, as determined by 1985, using DMSO with morphine, and measuring the
blood serum levels of the morphine.  This statement is found under the Heading,
"B. Membrane Transport", at:
http://dmso.org/articles/information/herschler.htm

Recently, since I'm still treating my hand and the inside of my nose, I decided
to add 10% distilled water to my [DMSO + 10% fluconazole], to make [10%
water/90% DMSO + 10% fluconazole].  So I measured 1.5 ml of distilled water,
(not an easy task, without the correct laboratory equipment pipette), into one
of my used 15 ml bottles, and filled it up with 13.5 ml of the [DMSO + 10%
fluconazole].  This gave me 15 ml of Rx made with 10% water/90% DMSO
concentration, + 10% fluconazole.

I've only had less than a month to "assess" this med, (made with 10% water/90%
DMSO), on my hand and inside my nose, so I am unable to say whether it is better
or not.

I believe that it may be better.
It seems to cause a little more "pinkness" for a day or two, and it seems to
create a greater "drying" effect, which in my opinion is better.
Logically speaking, it should produce a higher blood serum level of [DMSO +
fluconazole], and thereby have more effective "whole body effects", which might
even get rid of or "disarm" such things as the "polyps" that later turn into
colon cancer, (which I admit is a "stretch", but I have my reasons for believing
this may be true).

Whether this [10% water/90% DMSO + 10% fluconazole] is better for rosacea is
another question.  As you know, it can take months to come to any clear opinion
about something this hard to assess.  But you might try it.  But IF it IS more
effective, you MAY have to wait even LONGER, between med applications, to allow
the cascade healing effects to be "completed/finished".  :-)
I hope this helps.
God Bless, ITN & IDFN,
Dave Fleming
X=X=X=X=X=X=X=X=X=X=X=X=X=X=X=X=X=X=X=X=X=X=X=X

Date:   Wed, 23 Mar 2005 23:23:21 -0600
From:   "David"
To:   Dave Fleming <fulltruth40@...>
Subject:   10% Fluconazole no longer helping ????

Dave,
      I have corresponded with you before, but it has been a while.
I am quite concerned and would like your input.
I have used DMSO/Fluconazole for quite some time.  I started over a year ago
with the 1% solution that I had made locally by my compounding pharmacy.   It
contained the 200mg Ibuprofen like the original formula.  I had great results. 
I only had to use it weekly at first, then I decreased to every two weeks.  My
skin condition had been great until recently.

      I took your advise and ordered from the pharmacy you recommended Compounded
Solutions in Pharmacy and got the 10% fluconazole DMSO solution.  I agree with
what you told me before, that it does not burn quite as much as the 1% solution
but my skin is far worse.

It took me a while to figure out what was going on.
I started using the 10% solution weekly, and it took the full time to get over
the dryness caused by the solution.
I now have returned to my original condition, red, scaly, itching, with pimples
on the center of my forehead, both cheeks, and very slightly on the chin.  I can
cover it with concealer easily, but it was gone for a long time.
I do not seem to be getting the results from the 10% solution that I got from
1%.
I don't know if the 10% solution contains the ibuprofen or not, as it does not
say on the bottle.
I just know it no longer seems to help.
      I searched my bathroom closet and found Metrogel and have used it for three
days and the redness is greatly improved.  I still have this itching sensation,
that comes and goes.  I am quite disappointed as I paid $102 plus shipping for
the 10% Fluconazole DMSO solution, and it doesn't seem to help.

      What is your impression here and what should I do.
As I am sure you know, I have an element of seborrheic dermatitis on my face and
in the edge of my hairline (forehead area).  I know that Rosacea and Seborrheic
dermatitis seem to be common together, but it seems to be what starts the
redness in the firstplace.

I know you won't remember our prior conversations, as you most likely hear from
many, but my rosacea, I think, was causes by steroid creams that I was given by
my dermatologist for the seborrheic dermatitis.  I certainly would appreciate
your advise, as you have been such a great help in the past.
Sincerely,
David


---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
  Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site!

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

For Everyone,
"Janey" wrote to me recently, as in the email below.  "Janey" is the
fictitious name I gave, to the rosacean who is, to my knowledge, the
very first person to ever be prescribed [DMSO + 1% fluconazole],
(in Oct. 2003), FOR ROSACEA, (and in 2004, [DMSO + 10% fluconazole]).
I posted some of our past private email before, as at:
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/204

She used an old email to "Reply" to me recently, which contains some
of our private communication from a year ago.  Although we've communicated
some in the past 12 months, I thought I'd include the old email,
especially since it includes talk about Brady Barrows, one month
after he started using the 1% med on his rosacea.  As it turned out
four months later, I was right to suspect that Brady was not going to
admit that this med is even curative, much less the cure that it is.

$uch i$ the mind-$et of "ro$acea-profiteer$".  I have added
an "Editor's Note", as needed, in that May 2004 email, below.

The rosacea info at Dr. Syrokomsky's website, as at:
http://www.dr.syrokomsky.com/eng-page31.html
, continues to fascinate me, as a perfect example of how ANY doctor
can successfully offer this [DMSO + 10% fluconzole] treatment/cure to
rosaceans.


THIS FACT REMAINS TRUE, NO MATTER WHETHER THE GOOD
DOCTOR IS ACTUALLY USING [DMSO + fluconazole], OR NOT. :-D

See my "Talking Points", as at:
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/261

I hope this helps.
God Bless, ITN & IDFN,
Dave Fleming  ----TEXT OF EMAILS FOLLOWS, (in reverse chronological
order) ----

Dave Fleming wrote:
Hi, Janey,
Well, I don't know how to answer your questions, because
I don't even know for sure that the good Dr. Syrokomsky
is using [DMSO + fluconazole].
Of course, I believe he is.
If he is, he certainly knows the best way to present this cure, by
showing "before and after" photos, without any photos of the "cure in
progress".  He just keeps that to the verbal explanation.
So I suppose he doesn't want to "scare anyone off" with photos of
the "skin peeling", pinkness, etc, although he seems to be absolutely
honest about it, in his explanation.

I must confess to you that I haven't even tried to look up those
obscure words he uses, such as "fossa", etc.  I assume he's just
describing the medical extent of this disease, which apparently can
range from mild pinkness to horrendous deformation of the nose, etc,
and he says he uses the "extent" of the disease to determine how much
he charges.

As you may remember, I recommend that Dr. Perricone's ideas be
followed, concerning supplements, and to some degree, diet, in order
to try to keep our immune system at optimum, and to encourage the
growth of new healthy skin, to replace the rosaceous skin that seems
to be "killed/destroyed".   This seems to me to be "identical" to the
concept of the "herbs" and diet that Dr. Syrokomsky appears to
recommend.

Everything I read was so completely "identical" to what I've been
describing, (even the part about causing an "immune reaction, on
purpose"), that I have to be convinced that he's using [DMSO +
fluconazole].

It seems evident that Dr. Syrokomsky was in the "business" of helping
people with skin diseases before he ever found my "rosacea-cure"
website, two years ago.
But it appears clear to me that his most dramatic "true cures"
have been in the past two years, since I first posted this cure.
So that "fits", too.
It appears to me that he added this [DMSO + fluconazole] cure
to whatever arsenal of "remedies" he already knew, before two years ago.

Of course, under every photo that I see him write, "breaks the
regime", I think of you, Janey, and many other rosaceans who have
tried this cure, then not continued it to a complete cure.

By "breaks the regime", he certainly means "discontinues following
the complete directions of the regimen", and they no doubt
discontinue treatment because their rosacea symptoms have become so
much improved, as I mention at the end of my "Directions", as at:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/210

I also found that I returned to some level of application of the med
even many months after most of my rosacea was cured, because I
stopped applying the med too soon.

This med seems to work by "killing" layer, by layer, by layer, by
layer, etc, so it certainly does have to be repeated periodically
over a long time period, with all the inconvenience that can mean.

And some types of "infestation" do seem to be more resistent to this
med than other types of "infestation".  But the most serious
"rhinophyma" type infestations seem to be most quickly cured.

So, Janey, you are such a long-time "expert" with this med, that you
most likely know as much as I do, about what Dr. Syrokomsky is
doing/using.  I believe that you and I must certainly agree, that
whatever he's doing/using, it certainly looks exactly as it would if
he added [DMSO + fluconazole] to his "medical practice", two years
ago.
Only time will, tell, I suppose.
God Bless, ITN & IDFN,
Dave Fleming


From :  "Janey"
Sent :  Wednesday, March 9, 2005 12:55 AM
To :  fulltruth40@...
Subject :  RE: The 28 Day Theory In Curing Rosacea Dr. Syrokomsky

Dave, I know it has been a while since I've emailed you.  Nothing
really new.  I did see that you had talked about Dr. Syrokomsky
website.
I went to it and read it.  I would love to know how he says to use
the med. and if it is diflucan.
I kept reading and rereading his information on his site, and I am
just wondering if he knows exactly where to apply the most med.
(like for instance he states that the cure also depends on the amount
of fossa, superficial c?? .
I was just wondering what you thought and he also mentions taking
herb.  Thanks for your opinion.  God Bless.
x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x
x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x
----ONE YEAR OLD EMAILS FOLLOW----
x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x
From: "Dave Fleming" <fulltruth40@...>
To: "Janey"
Subject: The 28 Day Theory In Curing Rosacea
Date: Mon, 31 May 2004 15:10:53 -0500

Hi, Janey,
Thank you for your info on your use of the med.  It is very helpful
to me.
Am glad to hear you are optimistic.  That means so much, in helping
us to be patient and persistent with this cure, without giving up, or
even stopping too soon, because the "rosacea symptoms" decrease.

I recently sent some private email to Brady Barrows, that stated that
I think that this med "kills" the "rosacea causing entity" "around
the edges", in each "cycle", of med application and waiting.

I believe that during the waiting, your immune system is "cleaning
up" and "removing" the dead body of the "rosacea causing entity".
Also, new, healthy skin is replacing the old rosaceous skin.
Finally, after enough "cycles", there is nothing else left to "kill",
so there is little or no stinging, and certainly no subsequent
redness or peeling.

This would confirm the correctness, of your statement that
your "rosacea is shrinking".

Sometimes, there is what I call a "root area", (perhaps the size of a
quarter), which is more "resistant" than the rest of the "rosacea".
The new 10% med promises to "kill" such a resistant area much more
effectively.  Also, med applications inside the mouth, to the insides
of the cheeks may also more effectively "attack" such a resistant
area.

I believe such a "root area" may have been where this "rosacea
causing entity" first started growing, perhaps from a break or
scratch on the skin, even when we were a child.  Therefore, it is
more "established", and much harder for the 1% med to kill.

BTW, 28 days is not a completely "accurate" number.  It is just the
number of days I got from some obscure scientific study, which
defines the normal, average time that is required by anyone's skin,
to "replace itself".  In other words, after 28 days, every bit of the
skin we had before, is replaced by new skin.  That's just a statement
of the normal skin growth pattern, for everyone.  I put this info at:
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/14

I would guess that this time period is shorter for children, and
longer for the elderly.

So, I believe that you have to decide what the waiting period should
be, by watching and deciding when your skin has "returned to normal",
with no more peeling or redness caused by your immune system's
activity. The 28 days is really not a very accurate figure, since
each person will be in different "circumstances".

For example, if a person is "on vacation", on some South Pacific
island, they might use the med more often, because no one will be
there to see them, so they will not care about the "appearance" of
their face.

Of course, even if all rosacea symptoms are gone, the med
applications should still be continued, (as I think you know), until
little or no stinging occurs, and no subsequent redness or peeling
occurs.

That way, the "rosacea causing entity" will not be able to "grow
back".  The only way to  have rosacea after that, is if it
is "caught" from some new source, in the future, and there is good
reason to believe that that would take many years, to even be
possible.

So, I hope this clarifies that "28 days" figure.

Concerning the "ITN & IDFN", you are the first person to ask me about
this.  You may have noticed, that the "ITN" was even on the first r-c
message #2.  It actually has some "secret" meaning, concerning
honoring God's Will in this matter, and giving God the "credit" for
this cure.

I believe that my use of this "secret code" attracts the higher
spirit realm, to help to establish this cure on Earth, and to defeat
the dark, selfish "rosacea-profiteers".  My intention is to explain
this completely at some future time, so that all might come to
appreciate the working of God's Will on the Earth, at this most
special time in the history of mankind.

My apologies, Janey, for being so incomplete in my explanation to
you, about the "ITN & IDFN", but sometimes, God does require
some "secrecy", for the sake of more effective victory over dark
forces.  I do thank you for your interest, and caring question about
this.
God Bless, ITN & IDFN,
Dave Fleming


From: "Janey"
To: fulltruth40@...
Subject: RE: rosacea (new study for rosacea
Date: Sat, 29 May 2004 22:44:10 +0000

Hi Dave,  I don't know the exact number of times I applied med, but I
can give you an estimate.  I jotted them down on the calender,
unfortunately, my calender is at home.  I have gone through 3 and 1/2
bottles I believe.  The 1/2 bottle is the 10%.  The others were the
1%.  I will try to give you rough estimate, but hope this helps.  My
rosacea is looking to me like it is shrinking, but still is taking a
long time.  I am still optimistic.  I will keep you posted.
It hasn't been the 28 day mark since the last application. (Just
thinking about the email you sent me saying it take 28 days or longer
to kill of the mites or rosacea causing entity).
God Bless you.  What is ITN & IDFN??  Thanks!


From: "Dave Fleming" <fulltruth40@...>
To: "Janey"
Subject: RE: rosacea (new study for rosacea
Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 01:05:20 -0500

Hi, Janey,
Yes, it never hurts to wait a while.
I hope you have a good time.
Also, you never answered my question, (did you?), about how many
times you've actually used the med, since Oct. 2003.  If there is any
way you could give me an idea of that, it would help me understand
your situation better.
God Bless, ITN & IDFN,
Dave Fleming


     From: "Janey"
To: fulltruth40@...
Subject: RE: rosacea (new study for rosacea
Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 04:26:09 +0000

Hey Dave,   I am taking a break for the next couple of weeks
(psychological break) from applying the med. because my family and I
are going on vacation soon and don't want to be bright red and
peeling.  It's only been about 6 or 7 days so far since my last
application. I have only noticed a slight improvement in the
shrinking of the redness.  I know it needs a lot more time to work
though.  I am trying to wait patiently.  I will apply with the little
brush next time.  Plus I feel like I waste part of it when I apply it
with the Q-tip.  I want to get every drop!  I still haven't got the
anti-wrinkle, but I have been taking Vitamin C with Rose Hips and
ester c.  I will keep you posted.  Thanks again for all you advice.
GOD BLESS!


     From: "Dave Fleming" <fulltruth40@...>
To: "Janey"
Subject: RE: rosacea (new study for rosacea
Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 00:05:38 -0500

Hi, Janey,
Thank you, and I pray all is well with you.
Actually, although I've used the q-tip at times, and certainly inside
the nose, I usually use the "black brush" that comes with your bottle
of med, when I want to put the med on heavily.  You just can't use
the "tip", because it "sticks" you, and even "scratches" a little
bit.
I have found that the 10% med has a MUCH longer time of "action" than
the 1%, especially for those tiny "invisible" wrinkles.
It can be weeks and weeks, before the 10% is "finished working", so I
hope you have that anti-inflammation, anti-wrinkle cream that I
recommended to you.  It's in "rosacea-cure" message #187, if you
forgot.
I sure do wish there were some way to make this treatment/cure less
of a hassle, but no such luck.  Still, I thank God sincerely every
day, for this long-term relief, even if it does take a long time to
complete.
BTW, I do not trust Brady Barrows COMPLETELY, but he is currently
giving a good "review", to his use of this med.  There has been a
MASSIVE amount of private email between us in the last 30 days.
Because he will lose his "rosacea business" when this cure gets rid
of all rosacea, he is actually dragging his feet, and trying to claim
that this is just another "treatment", like all the "others".  So, I
do not trust him.
Still, I guess you would want to see his "coverage" of this.

<<<{Editor's Note, March 2005: The following listed five URLs were
valid in May 2004, exactly one month after Brady Barrows began his
use of the 1% med, but may be different now.  He did indeed let all
rosaceans down, when he proclaimed that this med did not cure his
rosacea, on Sept. 7, 2004.  Forgive him Father, for he know$ not what
he doe$, (or does he?), condemning hundreds of millions of rosaceans
to an unnecessary prolongation of their suffering.  The current URL
for Brady'$ "DMSO/fluconazole Diary", where he is still
marketing "cream$" to use with the [DMSO + 10% fluconazole], is:
http://www.rosacea-control.com/html/diary2.html

I do not know whether the "creams" that Brady is marketing ARE or ARE
NOT helpful to use with this [DMSO + 10% fluconazole]
treatment/cure.  I HAVE made it clear that, except for comfort and
appearance, NO "ADDITIONS" ARE NEEDED, to accomplish the curing of
rosacea with [DMSO + 10% fluconazole].  At one point, Brady Barrows
was making public posts to the effect that [DMSO + 10% fluconazole]
only "work$" with the "cream$" he is marketing.  Since that is
clearly deception, (no matter how good the "cream$" are), I was
forced to make that fact crystal clear publicly. --- END of Editor's
Note}>>>
It's at:
http://rosacea-control.com/html/tip.html#diflucan
http://www.rosacea-control.com/html/diflucandiary.html
http://rosacea-control.com/html/fluconazole.html
http://rosacea-control.com/html/davefleming.html
http://www.rosacea-control.com/html/diflucandirections.html

Hope this helps.
God Bless, ITN,
Dave


From: "Janey"
To: fulltruth40@...
Subject: rosacea (new study for rosacea
Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 05:59:57 +0000

Hi Dave,  Just thought I'd write you to let you know I applied  med
with Q-tips several days in a row and several applications so right
now I am really red and peeling.  I can't wait to see how much
improvement the 10% gives.  I will keep you posted.  Thanks and God
Bless.



--- In rosacea-cure@yahoogroups.com, Dave Fleming <fulltruth40@y...>
wrote:
> For Everyone,
> Here are some emails I exchanged with "Janey".  "Janey" is not her
real name,
----MESSAGE TRUNCATED----

For Everyone,
Here is a more detailed breakdown, of my thoughts about Dr. Syrokomsky's curing
of rosacea.  His website is indeed almost identical to what I would expect any
doctor would put on a website, if he were using [DMSO + fluconazole], as at:
http://www.dr.syrokomsky.com/eng-page31.html

(1)  Even though he is apparently in the Ukraine, in Europe, Dr. Syrokomsky
immediately mentions the "13 million" rosaceans in the USA.  This implies to me
that he knows a "secret", revolutionary new means of curing rosacea, and he is
not ruling out the fact that rich American rosaceans will pay whatever it takes
to come to see him, to get it cured.
As he states, "As you are surely seen in the Internet there are lot of sites
promising successful treatment with no results shown, but only I can demonstrate
impressive results of my treatment....  ...Finally you've found a doctor who
cures this disease. I cure everyone suffering from rosacea. After my treatment
you will be healthy if you follow strictly all my demands."
I could not have said it better myself, as I've been yelling it for about two
years now.  Exactly!  :-D

(2)  Although he does later state that diet is important to our health, he knows
that rosacea is not caused or "controlled" by diet, as he says, "ROSACEA is a
solely external disease. The disease course is unrelated to a diet."  Duh!

(3)  Again, he knows that rosaceans will pay any price to come visit him, to be
cured of rosacea, as he says, "I don't have representatives in your country.
I'm sorry, but the main proviso of your recovery, is your personal presence on
my consultation.  Your treatment can be carried out exclusively under my
observation."
He does later relent some, however, explaining that everything can be
accomplished in just one visit, (rather than five), if you pay for everything,
(i.e. all the medication), in advance.  He seems to be very sure that he has
what you need, and that no one else does.  To me, this strongly implies that
he's using [DMSO + fluconazole].  Exactly!  :-D

(4)  Dr. Syrokomsky does not state that he's using [DMSO + fluconazole], but he
doesn't deny it, either.  He craftily states, "The treatment is a topical
application of several chemical components dissolved in alcohol."
So, since DMSO and fluconazole can both be considered as "chemical components",
he could be telling the "truth" here, without revealing his "secret formula". 
To me, "alcohol" is just misdirection, since alcohol and DMSO are identical in
appearance, (although alcohol does have a distinct odor, and DMSO has none). But
I know of no "rule" written in stone that says that he could not mix some
alcohol with the DMSO and fluconazole, (without any harmful effect), which would
of course make the med smell like alcohol.  Exactly!  :-D

(5)  He states that he purposefully causes the redness and peeling skin, when he
says, "We trigger inflammatory response/reaction in the affected areas.
It's done on purpose and characterized by redness and peeling of the skin."
To me, this was the absolute "clincher", especially when he states the initial
time periods involved, when he states, "First few weeks 1 - 1.5 months for men
and up to 2 months for women procedures are painful; you will experience burning
sensation in the affected areas."
His English translation is lacking a bit here, because he obviously does not
mean that you'll be in pain for 2 months.  I know that he means that the
application of his "treatment" med causes the stinging for a few minutes, each
time, but that's only because I "know" his "secret", (so I believe).  :-)
Later, exactly according to this [DMSO + 10% fluconazole] cure, he states that
it may take many months, with no time limit, when he says, "A treatment course
is long, no less than 4 months."  Some of his photo evidence stretches out for
two years.  Exactly!  :-D

(6)  He mentions a "yellow-brownish" color that is possible if you are in the
sun, and which disappears completely later.  Although I never noticed this, I
was never in the sun.  Also, he "jogged my memory" that there might have been
some slight "brownish" color to my skin, a few days after the med was applied,
but before it peeled.

(7)  He shows that he "knows his stuff" as a doctor, when he lists the meds
commonly used for rosacea and states he does not use them, saying, "METROGEL and
RETINOIDS (RETIN - A, ISOTRETINOIN - ACCUTANE - ROACCUTAN), hormonal
preparations are not used in the treatment."

(8)  He then goes into a long explanation of all the improvements you can
expect, but he doesn't claim "miracles".  Just as I have stated, SOME of the
"damage" done by the rosacea will not disappear completely, but the skin becomes
obviously "healthy" and irreversibly free of rosacea.
Most strikingly, he states that the worst problems improve significantly within
one month.  This is exactly what I found.  The "cherry-red" part of my nose was
that pustule-ridden problem on my face, and it "reacted" the most strikingly.
The relatively minor problems on my cheeks took months longer, (with many more
med applications), to become completely clear.
He says, "Depending on a stage of disease if it's accompanied by acne, the most
terrible old abscesses disappear in 2 - 4 weeks from the beginning of my
treatment. But it's still not a cure."
Not a complete cure until later.  Exactly!  :-D

(9)  I have intentionally never approached any doctor about the possible
laser/IPL, (or other methods), that might decrease the two minor purple veins
that were left on the left side of my nose, after I was cured.  This is
partially because I am satisfied with my appearance, but certainly because I did
not want to "confuse the issue" later, allowing "rosacea-profiteers" to claim
that I was "really" cured by any means other than [DMSO + fluconazole].
Even after you are cured, he states that you may need more care for your skin,
when he says, "Taking into account you're very severe disease resulting in the
disfiguration of skin integuments you need the obligatory skin care according to
my recommendations after finishing the treatment course."  Exactly!  :-D


(10)  He emphasizes that you must reveal to him, all allergies you might have. 
This again proves his integrity and capability as a good doctor.  My opinion,
(which is easy to reach), is that Dr. Syrokomsky has been successfully helping
patients with skin diseases for many, many years, as he states on his Home Page.
I believe that he has simply added [DMSO + fluconazole] to his "treatment
arsenal", which has produced the spectacular cures that have only showed up in
his photographic proof during the last two years, (after I first announced this
[DMSO + fluconazole] cure on the Internet).
The photos of "cures" that he shows that occurred before two years ago are of
slight pinkness.  This early, minor "pink" stage of rosacea can certainly be
TEMPORARILY "controlled" by many means, since rosacea symptoms are known to
"come and go" at this stage.   So that "timing", of the most spectacular cures
shown by his photo evidence, (concerning ONLY the last two years), was quite
striking to me.  There are four pages of photos for
  rosacea, as at:
http://www.dr.syrokomsky.com/eng-page31.html
http://www.dr.syrokomsky.com/eng-page313.html
http://www.dr.syrokomsky.com/eng-page314.html
http://www.dr.syrokomsky.com/eng-page315.html
After his talk about the specifics of his cure for rosacea, he goes on with a
long ramble, about how the body must be "balanced" in many ways, to maintain
health.
To my mind, this is just his old "rap", which served him well for all the years
before I discovered this [DMSO + fluconazole] cure and put it on the Internet. 
He also uses the same identical "balanced body rap" on other parts of his
website, such as that for psoriasis, as at:
http://www.dr.syrokomsky.com/eng-page5.html
I have also stated that a healthy immune system and good growth of new skin to
replace the "dead rosaceous skin", caused by the [DMSO + fluconazole], are to be
encouraged, ideally.  In my case, I simply referred you to the recommendations
of Dr. Perricone, as being good ideas to follow, in conjuction with this cure.
Dr. Syrokomsky says the same thing, in my opinion, when he says, "At the same
time the patient takes a course of treatment with medical plants to strengthen
up your immune and other systems."  Exactly!  :-D
I hope this helps.
God Bless, ITN & IDFN,
Dave Fleming


---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
  Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site!

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

For EVERYONE,
Recently, I was arbitrarily doing a "Google search", for (rosacea cure), or was
it ("cure rosacea")?  I don't remember, but on about the third page, (i.e. about
20 or 30 down on the list), I found the following website:
www.dr.syrokomsky.com

When I read the good doctor's description of his cure for rosacea, as at:
www.dr.syrokomsky.com/eng-page31.html
, my eyes grew wide and my jaw dropped wide open.

Almost every single point he names,
(i.e. "burning, redness, skin peeling"),
and every part of his many-months-long "regimen"
(for his cure for rosacea),
are identical to what I would expect for this
[DMSO + 10% fluconazole] treatment/cure.

HIS WEBSITE IS A STELLAR EXAMPLE, OF WHAT ANY DOCTOR CAN DO,
ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD, TO MAKE THIS [DMSO + 10% fluconazole]
TREATMENT/CURE AVAILABLE TO ROSACEANS IN A WAY THAT WILL SUCCEED
AS QUICKLY AS POSSIBLE, IN REACHING ALL ROSACEANS.

BTW, YOU HAD BETTER READ DR. SYROKOMSKY'S WEBSITE QUICKLY, BECAUSE IT MAY COME
UNDER ATTACK BY "ROSACEA-PROFITEERS", AND "DISAPPEAR", BECAUSE OF MY POSTING IT
HERE ON THE "rosacea-cure" BOARD.

But I AM posting it, because I am as desperate as ever, to reach all rosaceans
with this treatment/cure as quickly as possible, and Dr. Syrokomsky's example
can be followed by all the doctors who care to get on top of this situation.

Of course, I do not know what rosaceans are paying, for this priceless service,
of curing their rosacea.  I can only hope that the good doctor at least
considers the income level of his patients, in determining his fee.

And I offer my opinion, that even God also grieves for those who suffer with
rosacea, and is working to bring final peace and health to all mankind, (as it
was in the Garden of Eden, before the Fall), as a New Age is beginning.

Christians call this the "Last Days", but most do not realize that the "Last
Days" also occurred when Jesus walked the Earth, so the Biblical references that
seem to predict physical destruction, (i.e. burning destruction of the Earth,
etc), are actually only symbolic.
The "Last Days", within this full-truth definition, means that we are in the
"Last Days" of the preceding "Age", and the beginning of a "New Age", centered
on the Second Advent of Christ.
So the "Last Days", and the "New Age" overlap, if you will.  :-)

At first, I thought I would email Dr. Syrokomsky, and ask him if he is using
[DMSO + fluconazole].  But after I prayed about it, I realized that I have a
definite, immutable "attitude", about this.
If he says "Yes", I will believe him.
But if he says "No", I will not believe him.

So I'm "stuck", with my own opinion, about this.  And this doctor has a perfect
right to maintain whatever secrecy he wants to, about his specific methods of
curing rosacea.

So, my adamant opinion/view, is that Dr. Syrokomsky is doing exactly what needs
to be done by all Medical Doctors and General Practitioners, etc, worldwide, in
order to offer this [DMSO + 10% fluconazole] treatment/cure to all rosaceans, IN
A WAY THAT IS AS CREDIBLE AND ACCEPTABLE TO ALL ROSACEANS AS IS POSSIBLE, GIVEN
THE FACTS OF THIS SITUATION.

But I must offer two deeply sincere apologies:
1) I apologize to all you who are reading this post, if I am incorrect in my
opinion/assessment, of Dr. Syrokomsky's cure.
I have absolutely no "scientific proof" for my opinion, but the
"coincidental identity" and "timing" of his work are so matched
to my presenting this [DMSO + 10% fluconazole] treatment/cure
on the Internet, that to me there is just no other conclusion
possible.
It is also completely possible that the good doctor's claims are complete
deception, but I strongly doubt this, because he states that he requires initial
and follow-up personal meetings with his rosacea patients, which does not sound
like a fraudulent situation to me.

2) I deeply and most sincerely apologize to Dr. Syrokomsky, for "outing" his
website, here on the "rosacea-cure" board, which may make his website a target
for "cyber-attacks" by "rosacea-profiteer" forces.
As my excuse, I can only say that the PATTERN of his example in this situation
is exactly what God needs, in my opinion, to guide other doctors, worldwide, in
how they might approach this situation, and thereby reach all rosaceans with
this cure as quickly as possible.
And this remains true, no matter what Dr. Syrokomsky says he's using....  :-D

Amen, amen, and amen.
I sincerely hope this helps.
God Bless, ITN & IDFN,
Dave Fleming


---------------------------------
Celebrate Yahoo!'s 10th Birthday!
  Yahoo! Netrospective: 100 Moments of the Web

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]