For Everyone,
Here is a recent email exchange with Brady Barrow$.  For the good of those who
read this [rosacea-cure] board, I've summarized some of the most crucial aspects
of this (DMSO + fluconazole) cure, not really just for Brady, but for the sake
of all mankind.  I also recently had a lengthy discussion with a prominent,
influential MD, concerning the below aspects of this cure, (and you certainly
made my day, Dr. C!).  As my high-school Principle once opined, "The wheels of
justice sometimes grind slowly, but they grind exceedingly fine".  If you have
studied this [rosacea-cure] board, there are no surprises for you in this post. 
But I hope you enjoy it, anyway.  
God Bless, ITN & IDFN,
Dave Fleming --- email follows, in reverse chronological order
----------------------------------------------

Dave Fleming wrote:

And An Alaskan Aloha to you, my dear, rascally Brady,

Because I've been busy, I've failed to take care of some of my rosacea-cure
board email.  
Today I was trying to catch up on it, and ran across your Sept. 26, 2008 email
to me.  
As usual, Brady, you try to be so subtle in your deception about this cure.  But
to me, (with Experiential Proof of this CURE), your deception, (and Pa$cal's),
is blatant.  

As you know so well, since you stated in your "diary" that it cured all your
pustules and papules, (which is at least 80% or 99% of rosacea, Brady), DMSO is
essential to this (DMSO + fluconazole) cure, because of its ability to
facilitate the transport and penetration of the fluconazole.
The URL you referred me to, at:
http://rosaceaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa-support.org/community/viewtopic.php?t=883
(Sorry, but I've changed this URL, because I don't want to encourage anyone to
read this conspiratorial, scheming trash.  To see it, just remove the extra "a"
letters.)
IT DOES NOT EVEN MENTION DMSO, and involves a mishmash of multiple drugs,
(including fluconazole), TAKEN ORALLY, while (DMSO + fluconazole) is
spectacularly effective, even when used only in small amounts and APPLIED ONLY
TOPICALLY.  

So the URL you referred us to not only does not substantiate my "theory", (read
as PROVEN CURE), but rather it substantiates the ongoing deception of folks like
Barrow$ and Pa$cal, concerning this (DMSO + fluconazole) cure.  (Na$e seems to
have put a sock in it, and rightfully so.)

Brady, as you no doubt know by now, this (DMSO + fluconazole) cure is being
substantiated all over the world.  Are you trying to hide this fact, in the
disinformation in this URL you've recommended???  Shame on you!  There's
obviously hell in store for those who suppress the news of this cure, so that
they can continue to make money by "treating/suppressing" the symptoms of the
suffering billions of souls involved here, (i.e. billions, because so many
different hitherto incurable diseases are curable with [DMSO + fluconazole]).  

OCCAM'S RAZOR APPLIED TO PERTINENT MECHANISMS OF THIS CURE:  
No one younger than sixteen has ever been diagnosed with rosacea.  This is one
of many facts that leads us to believe that a stealthy, either parasitic, or
partially-parasitic "entity" is causing this disease, and grows stealthily for
one or two decades, before any "symptoms" appear.  I've put "symptoms" in quotes
here, because the "symptoms" of rosacea are actually secondary,
indirectly-caused symptoms.  We find that fungal "entities" grow by sprouting
branching, spike-like "hyphae", [hi-fee] spines.  My guesstimate, is that the
spines would be about sewing-needle-size, if the size of each human cell were
about that of a basketball.  So after a decade or two, this "spiny growth"
finally begins to penetrate and actually physically destroy the human cells at
the "starting-point-root areas" of this very slow-growing disease "entity".  And
when our immune system naturally begins to attack and "deconstruct" those
physically damaged human cells, the
so-called "symptoms" of rosacea are caused.  But if we "treat/suppress" this
immune-system action, we are not only failing to allow this needed, healthy,
immune-system action to take place, but we are ignoring and failing to even
affect the underlying ROOT CAUSE of rosacea, namely, the "hyphae-growing
entity".  
This scenario explains all the mysterious aspects of rosacea, including how the
"symptoms" may come and go, (actually dependent on the vagaries of our
immune-system's strength), and why suppressing the inflammation may temporarily
suppress the "symptoms", but never cure the disease.  The disease is actually,
(viewed long-term), progressive, plain and simple.  And there is a parallel in
the mold on an apple.  If you've ever seen such mold, you may have noticed that
it grows as a circular, expanding patch.  But if you cut away all the
visually-apparent infestation, and then taste what appears to be unaffected
apple, your taste buds tell you you've made a terrible mistake.  Normally, by
the time you see the "starting-point-root" damage, the entire, normal-looking
apple has been invaded by these invisible "hyphae".  So when we apply (DMSO +
fluconazole) to any "patch" of apparent rosacea infestation, we normally find
that the actual boundaries of the infestation extend
far beyond that "starting-point-root" patch, although the areas farther from
that patch are less "reactive" to the med, because the infestation has had fewer
years to grow/attack there.  

OCCAM'S RAZOR APPLIED TO IDIOPATHIC-DISEASE MECHANISMS OF MYCOTOXINS:  
To top it off, we find that these disease "entities" are site-specific, (with
the partial-exception of candida), because they grow like a mushroom grows,
rather than multiplying as bacteria do, which can then travel around the body in
the bloodstream.  One good aspect of this, is that these "entities" took a
million years to evolve their complex form, so they cannot become "resistant" to
(DMSO + fluconazole), the way bacteria can mutate overnight to become resistant
strains.  SO THIS CURE IS HERE TO STAY.  But we do find that these "entities"
constantly secrete complex "mycotoxins" which do indeed travel throughout our
body.  These mycotoxins have two Darwinian motives:  
(1) To kill bacteria, since the "entities" compete with bacteria for "food"
(2)  To pre-digest their "food", (before they "eat" it).  We first eat our food
and then we digest it, but these "entities" first pre-digest their "food", (i.e.
in this case, the food is the human body!), then they "eat"/absorb it.  
This means that these stealthy, parasitic "entities" are putting mycotoxins into
our bloodstream, every second of every day, for decades, before we even have any
DISCERNIBLE symptoms that even allow us to know we're infested with this stuff. 
BUT (DMSO + fluconazole) DOES DETECT/EXPOSE AND CURE THEM, AT ANY STAGE OF THEIR
DEVELOPMENT! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
And what does this chronic mycotoxin presence do to us?  Only God knows, but we
can be certain that it's up to no good, given the fact that it's most likely
meant to "pre-digest" our body!!!  So we are presented with the strong,
quite-credible suspicion that such chronic mycotoxins may cause diseases that
have no known cause, (i.e. idiopathic diseases).  And the white-coat deceivers
try to hide the fact, that the list of idiopathic diseases is almost endless! 
In fact, when doctors "treat" us, they most often have no clue as to what they
are actually doing, since they are just "treating" symptoms!!!  So when or if
symptoms are secondary, or even multiple-cascade effects, so-called "modern
medicine" is most often in the dark, as to actually knowing the ROOT CAUSE of
any given "set of symptoms".  

And this (DMSO + fluconazole) cure does not reverse the underlying damage that
may become evident, when this disease is cured.  Whatever damage is done by this
"entity's" stealthy, parasitic growth cannot be reversed by this cure.  And
since delaying the use of this (DMSO + fluconazole) cure guarantees that the
disease "entities" will grow larger and do more irreversible damage, those
suffering billions of people will surely one day curse the names of Barrow$,
Pa$cal, and Na$e.  So there must be a very special, intense hell in store for
anyone who would actually use this cure, enjoy at least a partial cure of their
own rosacea, and then proceed to suppress, obscure, and deny the ACCURATE news
of this cure.  Wow, words fail me, Brady.  

And the $64-Trillion-dollar question is, "Exactly what percent of all rosacea is
caused by these disease "entities" that are now curable with (DMSO +
fluconzole), Brady"???  I believe the answer is obviously 100%!!!  But for some
reason, (which is obvious to all concerned), Barrow$ wants to obscure this
reality, by claiming there are other "causes" of rosacea.  So Barrow$ is
claiming to know more than the devious white-coat doctors claim, when they,
(only when pressed), admit they have no clue as to the cause of rosacea.  He's
motivated to claim there are a gazillion causes of rosacea, (at last count, he
was claiming 57), BECAUSE THAT'S THE ONLY WAY HE'S EVER GOING TO GET GRANT MONEY
FOR HIS ROSACEA-PROFITEER, BIASED, MOST-LIKELY-DECEPTIVE "RESEARCH".  

THE ASTOUNDING REALITY, IS THAT (DMSO + fluconazole) HAS A VIRTUALLY ZERO EFFECT
ON HEALTHY TISSUE, SO NO DIAGNOSIS IS NEEDED.  JUST APPLY (DMSO + fluconazole),
TO FIND OUT IF YOU NEED THIS CURE.  IF YOU DO NEED IT, THEN THE "ENTITIES"
CAUSING YOUR ROSACEA WILL LOSE THEIR DECADES-LONG PARASITIC-PROTECTION FROM YOUR
IMMUNE SYSTEM, (since it is established that an active vector of fluconazole is
that it strips and/or inhibits the ergosterol in the cell walls of the disease
"entity").  THEN, EVIDENCE OF YOUR IMMUNE SYSTEM'S ATTACK ON SUCH "STRIPPED
ENTITIES" , (SUCH AS INFLAMMATION AND PEELING SKIN), WILL APPEAR.   Generally,
wherever there are the most sensitive, tactile nerve-endings, a few minutes of
stinging will occur, NOT BECAUSE DAMAGE IS OCCURRING, BUT BECAUSE THE DISEASE
"ENTITIES" HAVE INTEGRATED THEMSELVES WITH THE NERVE ENDINGS, SO THE MED'S
ATTACK ON THE "ENTITIES" CAUSES THE NERVE ENDINGS TO "FIRE", CAUSING THE "FAUX"
STINGING SENSATION
TO OCCUR.  (It really is "faux", but it does hurt.) It's possible that adding
1% or 2% Lidocaine to this (DMSO + fluconazole) med would lessen or even
eliminate the stinging.

BUT THERE IS NO OTHER CURE.  AND ANY "TREAT/SUPPRESS-THE-SYMPTOMS" DELAY WILL
CAUSE THE LONG-TERM, IRREVERSIBLE DAMAGE TO INCREASE EXPONENTIALLY.  SO THIS
CURE IS ABSOLUTELY BETTER SOONER, THAN LATER.  

Admittedly, this is not a convenient cure, especially when we are curing facial
skin.  We socially-attuned humans may be understandably devastated by the
temporary inflammation and peeling skin this cure entails.  There may even be
some permanent damage that was done by these disease "entities", which may, (or
may not), become apparent after this cure is accomplished.  For example, I still
have two small purple veins on the left side of my nose, where I cured my
developing rhinophyma.  Some "stable, non-diseased pinkness" may be left.  I
have even observed small, almost invisible wrinkles on the back of my left hand,
where I cured a substantial infestation.  BUT SUCH HEALTHY-SKIN IMPERFECTIONS
CAN CERTAINLY BE SUCCESSFULLY MINIMIZED BY MODERN DERMATOLOGIC MEANS, (SINCE,
[i.e. IF AND ONLY IF], THE SKIN IS NO LONGER DISEASED).  

So, dear Brady, your attacks, both subtle and strident, (long ago, in May 2003),
once forced me to do the work of assembling a "Directions List", as at
[rosacea-cure] message #210, as at:
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/210
In this email response, I've been encouraged to state the plain facts in a short
form, so as to make it possible to reach even more people with this cure.  As
the Bible puts it, "You meant it for harm, but God turned it into good".  You
might also look up Mark 14:21, if you want to know what I think of your
continued attempts at disinformation, concerning this (DMSO + fluconazole) cure.
 
God Bless, ITN & IDFN,
Dave Fleming
================================================

>>Aloha from Brady
>>Friday, September 26, 2008 1:59 AM
>>From:  "Brady Barrows" <brady@...>
>>From:  brady at bradybarrows.com
>>To: rosacea-cure-owner@yahoogroups.com

>>Brady Barrows wrote:
>>Aloha Dave,
>>Just thought you would be interested in this post:
>>
>>http://rosaceaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa-support.org/community/viewtopic.php?t=883
>>
>>This is the first post that has ever substantiated what you have
>>been saying all along.
>>
>>Anyway, Congratulations that someone has substantiated your theory.
>>
>>[BRADY'S ADVERTISING HERE HAS BEEN DELETED]
>>
>>I think that rosacea is a catch all diagnosis that physicians use
to call any skin condition that causes facial redness.
The number of skin diseases that look like rosace is
staggering and apparently one of them is a Fungus Rosacea.
>>
>>Brady

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]