Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
rosacea-cure · topical DMSO+FLUCONAZOLE to cure rosacea
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Message search is now enhanced, find messages faster. Take it for a spin.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Completely Curing Me, With Higher Dosage (DMSO + Fluconazole)   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #282 of 291 |
Higher dosages/amounts of (DMSO + Fluconazole) are evidently needed, and produce
more comprehensive cures, than the very low dosages I've been using and
advocating, since April 2003 on this [rosacea-cure] board.
First, I'm pasting the following cures I've experienced, as I listed them, at:
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/278
THE FOLLOWING LIST IS COPIED FROM THERE:
So, what have I cured on myself?
(1) very extensive case of nail fungus on both big toes, and minor fungus in my
left thumbnail
(2) stealthy, extensive/deep "infestation" on the back of my left hand
(3) rosacea on both cheeks and beginning rhinophyma on my nose
(4) athlete's foot, (including occasional bleeding cracks between toes and
decades-long, reoccurring, pus-filled "fungal blisters") on both feet
(5) one obvious "liver spot", (i.e. tinea versicolor), on my left forearm
(6) three or four "nondescript spots/areas", on my left forearm
(7) stealthy "infestation" on the back of my right hand, (very different from
what was on my left hand)
(8) "chronic low-level inflammation" of a spot at the top of my "butt crack",
(sorry, I don't know the scientific name for this spot, other than "adjacent to
coxis bone at bottom of spine") --- I had to have serious surgery to "lance a
boil" at this spot in 1976
(9) probable cure of a probable "infestation" of my vocal cords, which hindered
my singing since about 1989
(10) possible cure of possible "internal infestation" inside my upper right arm
muscle, (possibly caused/introduced decades ago by past hypodermic needle
injection)
(11) "infestations" inside both outer ears, which manifested occasionally for
decades, like painful "internal boils", especially when I was under stress
(12) Most importantly, I have probably cured other "infestations" in my body,
without even knowing I had them or cured them.
On-Going Cures With End In Sight:
(A) nasal and sinus "infestations"
(B) whole scalp, ears, neck and forehead very extensive "stealthy infestation",
(possibly "ringworm"???)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Concerning the above listed "On-Going Cures", "(A)" and "(B)", higher dosages
have proven to be safe, needed, and effective, in my current experience.

So the time has come, for me to "talk frankly", about the maximum dosage that
can and should be used of this (DMSO + Fluconazole) med, BOTH AS TOPICAL
APPLICATION, AND AS INGESTED MED. I have always been very conservative about
dose amounts, because I have not wanted anyone to "overdose" because of any
recklessness on my part. But since I have entered the realm of "higher
doses/amounts" of this med, during the last few months, I have to communicate
this to you.
This does not mean that I've lost my conservative mind-set; I still do not want
to do permanent damage to my liver with too much Fluconazole/Diflucan content of
this med.
But I have experienced "whole-body, curative effects" from higher doses of this
med, (containing medically acceptable doses of Fluconazole/Diflucan), ESPECIALLY
WHEN INGESTED, (i.e. SWALLOWED), and I have to report this.
To clarify, ORAL Fluconazole is swallowed, and this (DMSO + Fluconazole) liquid
med can also be swallowed, but this should NOT be called ORAL (DMSO +
Fluconazole) administration.
A different term should/must be used, (i.e. INGESTED), because swallowing this
med is not the same as swallowing a capsule of Fluconazole/Diflucan.

There are many reasons for this distinction, but the main reason is that
swallowing this liquid med means that the Fluconazole content is going to be
"absorbed/trapped", (at least temporarily), by the tissues of the mouth,
esophagus, and perhaps the stomach and intestines; also, we simply do not know
whether the DMSO and Fluconazole molecules remain "linked", or "synergistic" in
some way, (and are therefore safer and/or more effective than ORAL Fluconazole
alone), as they make their way into and through the body. So, the overall
effects of this INGESTED (DMSO + Fluconazole) med MAY be very different, (i.e.
effective vs. ineffective), than the effects of taking ORAL Fluconazole tablets
or capsules.

We simply have no way of KNOWING this, and concerning this distinction, I don't
even like to "guess" about it. But my strong belief, is that a "higher
dosage/amount" of INGESTED (DMSO + Fluconazole) is effective in curing these
"stealthy disease entities" throughout the body, whereas ORAL Fluconazole is
not, (or is not AS effective). A major reason for this/my belief, is that the
(DMSO + Fluconazole) penetrates even inside each cell of the human body, whereas
Fluconazole alone only circulates in the bloodstream. Again, the only "proof" of
this I have, is as I mentioned, at:
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/193

So my belief is based mainly on thinking that the DMSO and Fluconazole molecules
continue to be "linked"/"synergistic", and work together throughout the body,
rather than separately. And I have absolutely no "proof" that this is true,
(other than my own experience with this med, since I have never taken ORAL
Fluconazole/Diflucan tablets or capsules). Incidentally, it MIGHT be effective
to COMBINE taking some ORAL Fluconazole/Diflucan with our use of TOPICAL and/or
INGESTED (DMSO + Fluconazole/Diflucan); I simply do not know, about this,
because I've never taken ORAL Fluconazole tablets or capsules.

Since I don't like to divulge my age and weight on the internet, I'm going to
speak in terms of "mg/kg" dosage, (of fluconazole content of the med), which is
the correct way, anyway, since it is the medically approved method of "dose
determination" for ORAL fluconazole.
one kilogram = 2.2045 pounds
one pound = 0.4536 kilograms

The DMSO content will be considered to be completely benign, (in the
doses/amounts associated with the use of this med), and determined by the med
used, (e.g. one ml of 10% med contains about one ml of DMSO, and one ml of 5%
med also contains about one ml of DMSO). In other words, even though it is not
exact, we can say that one milliliter of
[(90% DMSO/10% water) + 5% Fluconazole + 2% Ibuprofen],
and one milliliter of
[(90% DMSO/10% water) + 10% Fluconazole + 2% Ibuprofen],
and one milliliter of
[(90% DMSO/10% water) + 50% Fluconazole + 2% Ibuprofen]
each contain 0.9 ml of DMSO, which is about one milliliter of DMSO.

I recently, (April 2007), did some research and found information on the
medically accepted doses for ORAL Fluconazole/Diflucan, at the following URLs:
http://www.rxlist.com/cgi/generic/flucon_cp.htm
http://www.globalrph.com/renaldosing2.htm
************************************
http://www.mhra.gov.uk/home/idcplg?
http://www.google.com/search?q=cache:730gnLP0wIoJ:www.mhra.gov.uk/home/idcplg%3F\
\IdcService%3DGET_FILE%26dDocName%3Dcon009655%26RevisionSelectionMethod%3DLatest\
+\30mg/kg+fluconazole+in+dogs&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1&gl=us
************************************
http://aac.asm.org/cgi/content/abstract/43/12/2831
http://gateway.nlm.nih.gov/MeetingAbstracts/102205513.html
=================================================
THE FOLLOWING TWO URLs SPEAK OF 14 DAYS OF 400mg/day, (or 6mg/kg per day), and
800mg/day, (or 12mg/kg per day), dose of Fluconazole.
=================================================
http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/libra/cmro/pre-prints/3824;jsessionid=2mia\
\jo14kq9f0.alice
http://oberon.ingentaselect.co.uk/fstemp/929726a44c2059eb1a13fa30944f40ac.pdf
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

So 30mg/kg has been given ORALLY to dogs, daily, for weeks at a time, with "no
ill effects". There are two "levels" of medically acceptable dosages for ORAL
Fluconazole/Diflucan human use:
400mg per day = 6mg/kg for an "average" 67kg, (i.e. 150 lb), person.
800mg per day = 12mg/kg for an "average" 67kg, (i.e. 150 lb), person.
In giving ORAL Fluconazole/Diflucan, the first day's dose is called the "loading
dose", and is double the following daily doses. So if the intention is to give a
daily dose of 12mg/kg, for perhaps two weeks or longer, the first day's dose
would be 24mg/kg.

I did not keep a journal, so the following facts are "from memory".
On Sept. 4th, 6th, and 8th of 2006, I laid down on a bed, with my head hanging
over the edge, to keep my nasal passages upside-down, and I used a glass
"eye-dropper" to put
[(90% DMSO/10% water) + 25% Fluconazole + 1% Ibuprofen]
into my nose, which contained a Fluconazole dose of 6mg/kg, according to my
rather high body weight. I kept the med in my nasal passage, for 15 to 30
minutes, and then I "snorted in" the med and "secretions", and swallowed them.
I repeated this treatment, on Nov. 24th, 26th, and 28th, 2006.
Results were good, (given that no other cure exists), with very
slowly-manifested, beneficial lessening of "nasal blockage". But I was being
extremely conservative with this dosage of med, partially because of my
"restricted budget", but mostly because I don't want the invasive "blood tests"
necessary, to guarantee that no "side-effect, permanent liver-damage" might
occur, as it's listed in "possible side-effects" of ORAL Fluconazole/Diflucan,
as at:
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/111

During December 2006, I finally measured the total volume capacity of my nasal
passages. I put my head back and filled my nose with distilled water; I found
the volume to be exactly 20 ml, and I learned three things:

(1) There was some discomfort, (i.e. slight pain), when this distilled water
filled my nose. Since pain is the indication that this med is needed, I made a
mental note, that pain inside the sensitive nasal passage MIGHT be caused by the
(DMSO + fluconazole) med, even if this med is NOT "needed". In ALL topical
applications, any change in appearance of the skin, and/or pain or itching upon
application of this med, ALWAYS means that this med is "needed", since this med
has virtually NO effect on healthy tissue. However, because of the curative
effects in my nasal passages, (although it's been very slow, since I've just
been applying the med with Q-tips), during the last five years, I'm very sure
this med has been and is "needed", in my nasal passages and associated "sinus
cavity".

(2) My knowledge of physiology is lacking, because I did not know that the two
sides of the nasal passage become one, before entering the throat. In other
words, I found that, (with my head back), when I voluntarily closed off the
connection to my throat, (breathing through my mouth), and put water in one
nostril, the other nostril also filled with water. So unless "nasal congestion"
blocks it, even putting the med in only one nostril will treat the entire nasal
passage on both sides.

(3) With 20 ml total volume, even a total of 10 ml of med would treat/"soak" the
entire nasal passage on both sides, if you at first lie on your back with your
head back, (treating/"soaking" the "sinus cavities" area), and then hold your
nose closed with your fingers and sit upright, (treating/"soaking" the entire
inside of the lower nose).

On April 2, 2007, I put a dose of
[(90% DMSO/10% water) + 25% Fluconazole + 2% Ibuprofen]
into my nasal passages which contained
over 18mg/kg of Fluconazole.

On record, concerning an "overdose" of ORAL Fluconazole/Diflucan, there is one
case of a 42-year-old man who took 8,200 mg, at:
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/111
If he was of "average weight", of 150 lbs, (i.e. 67 kg),
this was a dose of 124mg/kg.
The effects were rather strange. It says that he "had hallucinations", and "was
paranoid". He was hospitalized, and the effects ended after two days. He
appeared to have "no permanent damage", and he was released.
I mention this case, because I think I MAY have had some "false, olfactory
sensory-input", caused by my application of this med in my nasal passages. Back
in Sept. and Nov. 2006, after even just a 6mg/kg single dose, I was smelling
something like "lighter fluid", off and on, for a couple of days.
After the April 2007,
18mg/kg single, nasal, (and INGESTED), dose,
I was smelling what seemed to be "auto-exhaust fumes", for the next ten days.
It was hard to tell, if it was a "real" smell or not. Without other people to
tell you there is no such smell, it is a "real smell", although it did not cause
me any discomfort whatsoever, waking or sleeping.
It was not the "rotten-eggs" smell of emission-control exhausts, but the heavy,
"sweetish" smell of the old auto exhausts. Since I knew this must be an
"inaccurate sensory-input", it did not bother me. But given the deadly effects
of the carbon monoxide in auto exhaust, I could have become quite "paranoid".
:-)

Whether this disease and cure has permanently damaged my ability to smell, is
still to be determined, (which will be about two months after the 100% cure and
last application of the med). My present "smelling ability" seems to be
adequate, but may be "less than normal".
I've had only one place that actual "lesions" formed, during this cure, and that
was on my scalp. This was described, at:
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/278
These "curative lesions" were about half an inch in diameter, and were deep,
which meant that "new, healthy scalp" had to grow in from the edges, which
required about a month or longer. At first, the scabs covering these raised
lesions were easy to remove, because they were "floating" on an area that was
obviously being acted on by my immune-system. After a couple of weeks, these
scabs became flat, and were "firmly attached" like any normal scab, making it
impossible to remove them, except by "soaking and washing", in the shower.

In the nasal passage, there has been a similar pattern.
The main difference, is that "scabs" in the nasal passages impede the air-flow,
and therefore must be removed daily. So at the bottom of the nose, which has
been treated for years, (with tiny amounts of med on Q-tips), there is healthy
tissue, and further up, there is some "permanent, firmly attached scabbing"
which is very thin and does not impede air-flow much.
Still further up, there is the "newly cured" area, with "floating scabs" that
are thicker, and can be physically removed easily, (using my pinky-finger). When
they are removed, there is some minor bleeding, which stops after a couple of
minutes of being absorbed by a kleenex.
On the scalp, I could easily apply the med even several times a day.
But in the nasal passages, because of the inconvenience, the pain, and my
decision to swallow all the med used, I have been very conservative, in the
number of med applications, and in the amount of med applied. Since I'm
presently experiencing good results, with almost all of the scabs in the nasal
passages being more "permanent", (i.e. in a "final cure" stage), (and thinner),
I'm satisfied with my ongoing results.

However, since I've put up with "nasal scabbing", and what amounts to a daily
"nose bleed", for the past several months, (and even years), I recommend a much
more aggressive application of this med, for anyone with this "nasal disease"
and/or "sinusitis". Perhaps the whole nasal cavity should be filled with med and
"soak" for 30 minutes, once or twice a day for at least a week, or even six
weeks; and perhaps it would be good to "snort out" the remaining med, rather
than INGEST it, to control dosage more closely.
THE FOLLOWING ARE MY TWO MOST IMPORTANT THOUGHTS, ON THIS:
(1) I'M NOT RICH, AND THIS MED IS STILL NOT REALLY CHEAP, (IN THE USA), SO I'VE
NEVER WANTED TO "SNORT OUT" AND DISCARD THE MED NOT ABSORBED IN THE NOSE WITHIN
15 TO 30 MINUTES, (AND ALSO BECAUSE I BELIEVE IT HAS "WHOLE-BODY, CURATIVE
EFFECTS); BUT "SNORTING IT OUT" WOULD ENCOURAGE MORE FREQUENT
"SOAKING/TREATMENT" OF THE NASAL PASSAGES, WITH ZERO POSSIBILITY OF "OVERDOSING"
THE FLUCONAZOLE CONTENT.

(2) ONE ALSO HAS TO STEADFASTLY IGNORE THE "NASAL/SINUS" PAIN THAT MAY OCCUR,
BECAUSE THIS PAIN DOES DECREASE A LOT, IF THE MED IS APPLIED FREQUENTLY.
************************************
************************************
Now, I'd like to tell you about my use of much larger dosages/amounts of
TOPICALLY APPLIED (DMSO + Fluconazole) med, during the last several months.
First, I have used a lot of
[(90% DMSO/10% water) + 10% Fluconazole + 2% Ibuprofen],
on my scalp, neck, ears, (and even inside my ears), AND FACE AND EYES, (about a
250 square-inch area).
I have also used a lot on my left forearm and hand, (about a 150 square-inch
area).
For economy's sake, I currently believe that
[(90% DMSO/10% water) + 5% Fluconazole + 1% Ibuprofen]
is just as effective, as the
[(90% DMSO/10% water) + 10% Fluconazole + 2% Ibuprofen],
since I can buy the 99%DMSO and add it to the Rx, to make it last twice as long,
as I clarified at:
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/278

It was MAY 2006, when I posted the info about my first "whole scalp, neck and
ears" treatments, as at:
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/278
You should read there, concerning my first really extensive, (i.e. over 200
square-inch area), TOPICAL applications of
[(90% DMSO/10% water) + 10% Fluconazole + 2% Ibuprofen].
Except for a small, 7-inch circle of about 2-inch-long hair at the top of my
head, I kept all my hair cut to a length of one-eighth inch, for this treatment,
but if you're willing to use more med, cutting the hair is not absolutely
necessary, since the med seems to have no effect on the hair.

Because I had gotten the price down some on the med, as at:
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/278
, I began to think of using it "by the liter", rather than "by the 15 ml bottle"
I had been prescribed during the preceding four years.
I must repeat here, that THE DIRECTIONS FOR USE OF THIS MED ON NAIL-FUNGUS, ARE,
"APPLY TWICE DAILY, FOR SIX WEEKS".
In fact, I now believe this med should be applied to the whole foot, rather than
just to the nails, because these "stealthy disease entities" appear to have
extensive areas of invisible infestation, which "support" the small area of
visible symptoms.
It MIGHT even be, that the mycotoxins such an infestation MAY put into your
bloodstream for decades from one part of your body, (e.g. your arm), would make
you vulnerable to get infestations in other parts of your body, (e.g. your
nose/face and/or your toenails).
As another example, way back in 2002, I cured an infestation on the back of my
left hand, and later cured a three-inch-wide area of infestation centered on a
"liver-spot", (i.e. tinea versicolor), on my left forearm. During the last few
months, I discovered that this was one huge, invisible/stealthy infestation,
which in fact extended from my hand all the way up to my elbow.
[And BTW, the extent of this "grown-back" infestation on the back of my left
hand was only about 1% or less, of what it was when I first cured it, in
2001-2002, with (DMSO + 1% Fluconazole + 2% Ibuprofen).]

Strangely, "this disease" seems to affect different types of skin in different
ways, so the "thickened, pale-white, dead, alligator-skin" made apparent by this
med on the back of my left hand is completely different than the "mottled, red,
bumpy-skin appearance" just three inches away, on my whole forearm. Of course,
the whole area looked "normal", before the application of the med.
Also, for some strange reason, the finger-skin, and the palm-skin on the front
of my hands seem to be completely "immune" to this "infestation"; the
infestation wrapped around the left hand, up to the "palm-skin", but stopped
there.

I went to a hardware store and bought a small, 1-inch-wide paintbrush. It was
cheap, (65 cents), and made of "natural bristles", in Indonesia. I washed the
brush very thoroughly with hot water and dish-washing soap, and rinsed it very
well, before using it, (because I don't want any "chemicals" from the brush
being brought into my skin by the DMSO in the med).
I used this brush, to "paint" my arm, with the med. I did not dip it in the main
med bottle, but poured about 5 or 10 ml into a small container; and each
application of the med took about 5 or 10 ml. And just as in painting, the med
would sometimes "run", and try to "drip", so I would catch the drips and keep
spreading the med around the arm for a couple of minutes, until it was partially
absorbed. Then, I would hold my arm in different positions for about 10 minutes,
to prevent the water-thin med from dripping.

I TREATED MY WHOLE ARM AND HAND, (including about 3 inches above my elbow, which
was not affected by the med), TWICE DAILY, FOR FIVE DAYS, with
[(90% DMSO/10% water) + 10% Fluconazole + 2% Ibuprofen].
I found that the "liver-spot" I had cured long ago, was surrounded by an
infestation that centered on it, but extended all the way up and around my
forearm, leaving just a thin strip of "least infested" skin, on the bottom of my
forearm.
AFTER FIVE DAYS OF TREATMENT, the whole forearm was pink and feverish, with a
few spots where the "infestation" seemed to be "rooted". And the back of my left
hand had a very thin layer of the same "alligator-skin" that was very much
thicker when I cured this back in 2001-2002. This was about two months ago, and
when I treated the whole arm again, a week ago, there was no longer any of the
stinging and itching I felt, when I applied the med every day for five days. So
I may treat this area again, in a year or two, but I believe that this "higher
dosage/amount" of the med has cured this area permanently, this time.

An interesting note, is that I've noticed a small "raised bump", on the second
joint of my middle finger, on my left hand. This "bump" has been a little sore
to touch/pressure, which normally denotes an area that is being cured by this
med. Since arthritis is one of the idiopathic diseases that I have suspected
might be caused or made worse by the mycotoxins put out by these "stealthy,
disease entities", [that are curable with (DMSO + Fluconazole)], I mention this
as a possible subject for long-term clinical studies. In my case, I intend to
continue to apply (DMSO + Fluconazole) to this finger and surrounding area,
(during the coming months and years), to see if this "bump" goes away
completely.
********************************************
********************************************
Now I'd like to describe my use of increased dosages/amounts of
TOPICAL (DMSO + Fluconazole) on my head. When I applied larger amounts of
[(90% DMSO/10% water) + 10% Fluconazole + 2% Ibuprofen],
on my scalp, neck and ears, (even INSIDE my ears), I decided to include my
entire face, to make sure of my past cure there. I found that there were a
couple of spots on my chin and below the left cheek, which showed some minor
"reaction", when the med was applied to the whole face. I also found that the
"normal looking skin" on my forehead also showed some "reaction". The parts of
the cheeks below my eyes, (which were long ago cured of rosacea), had no
"reaction", but showed some subsequent "dry skin", minor flaking, for weeks.

Most importantly, I had seen a few "white spots" on the inside of the bottom lid
of my left eye, so I treated that by pulling down the lid, and applying med
there with a q-tip. This med caused some stinging there, but since this med
made with (90% DMSO/10% water) might normally cause stinging on such sensitive
mucus membranes, I continued to watch this area, to see if a cure was brought
about.
There were definite changes that proved to me that a cure of this area, around
the bottom eyelashes, did take place.
Furthermore, I liberally applied the med to my lightly-closed, (i.e. NOT
tightly-closed) eyes, and some later soreness to touch/pressure, around the left
eye, (but not the right eye), proved to me that this liberal application of the
med to my lightly-closed eyes was indeed having curative effects, especially
around, (and in?), the left eye.

So I'm more convinced than ever, that this (DMSO + Fluconazole) med will cure
ocular rosacea. At the same time, an eye-drop med formulated with a much lower
DMSO concentration would most likely be more appropriate, such as
[(6% DMSO/94% water) + fluconazole].
A couple of years ago, there was a med formulation said to prevent and cure
cataracts, containing glutathione in 6.25% DMSO. But it seems to have been
"erased" from EVERY AND ANY EXTENSIVE Google-Search I did today, (MAY 2007), by
otc products, (et al), that require you to use their eye-drops FOUR TIMES A DAY,
FOR 6 TO 12 MONTHS, AND DON'T EVEN GUARANTEE RESULTS IN CURING CATARACTS; this
smells like a "Big Pharma" conspiracy to me....
Digging VERY deep, I found a MAY 2004 message on the Yahoo! group
(DimethylSulfoxide-DMSO) board,
as at:
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/DimethylSulfoxide-DMSO/message/722
, In MAY 2004, Garnet wrote:
(FORMULA FOR Rx TO CURE CATARACTS):
---->DMSO - 6.25 percent
---->Vitamin C - 1.25 percent
---->Glutathione - 1.25 percent
---->QS Distilled Water
This was from a post to the Silver List. It is a formula credited to Dr Robert J
Rowen.
There is a phone number in the email as well 707.575.1313
Garnet
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
===>===>===>===>===>===>===>===>===>===>===>===>===>
EDITOR'S NOTE: Incidentally, I have known about this [DimethylSulfoxide-DMSO]
Yahoo! group since shortly after it was founded, in Jan. 2004, but I have never
"mentioned/advertised" it here on the [rosacea-cure] board, because I found that
the "hidden agenda" of the owner, "Garnet", is to sell products related to CS,
(i.e. Colloidal Silver). The group appeared with, (magically), over 400 members,
over three years ago, and there has been no appreciable increase in the number
of members, since then; (hmmmmmm). CS has a "spotty record", having been
discredited by the FDA, (possibly a compliment); subsequent sales of "home
CS-Generators" have effectively by-passed the FDA ban. Frankly, I don't know
what CS does or does not do, and "Garnet" has been putting a lot of interesting
and useful info on her board, about DMSO, so I'm finally mentioning it on this
[rosacea-cure] board, since her board appears to be the ONLY place I could find
ANY current mention of these (glutathione-in-6%-DMSO) eye-drops that
prevent/cure cataracts.
<===<===<===<===<===<===<===<===<===<===<===<===<===
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I called Dr. Rowen's office, (May 2007), and they were kind enough to inform me
that they were forced to stop writing most Rxs of this (glutathione in 6%DMSO)
formulation, because laws were changed about 18 months ago, (concerning
sterility of CP products), which made it too expensive for most Compounding
Pharmacies to produce any eye-drops. (I smell the feces of "Big Pharma's"
creating such laws, to make it almost impossible to find a CP to fill this Rx.)
All indications, are that Dr. Rowen is just as sure as ever, that these
eye-drops are safe and effective in at least preventing and stopping the
progression of cataract growth, since the word "cure" is forbidden, by current
FDA hocus-pocus. In fact, a spokesperson at "Second Opinion Newsletter" told me
that Dr. Rowen uses this (DMSO + glutathione) Rx every day, IN HIS OWN EYES,
(one drop per each eye, daily), to prevent cataracts. With great DIFFICULTY, I
found a CP who fills this Rx, (a one-month supply of these eye-drops), for $59.
Dr. Rowen can currently be reached through:
http://www.doctorrowen.com/
http://www.getprolo.com/california_rowen_prolotherapy.htm
http://www.secondopinionnewsletter.com/contact.php
, and perhaps through:
http://www.bioimmune.com/about_us/investor/press.asp?id=1
But I digress.
Having totally discredited those liars who have been claiming harm from this
(DMSO + Fluconazole) med, I want to encourage everyone that much larger
dosages/amounts of this med should most likely be used, to obtain the most
convenient, expedient, effective cure(s), (with your doctor's advice and
consent, of course;-). Even though the "mechanism" of this cure means that it
will take time, and patient persistence, (i.e. our immune system must work along
with the med effects), it can definitely be much faster than I have experienced,
with this new knowledge of the safety and effectiveness of more aggressive
dosage amounts, both TOPICALLY APPLIED, AND INGESTED.

I am almost totally cured now, of these "stealthy, insidious diseases" that are
curable ONLY with (DMSO + Fluconazole). If, in Nov. 2001, I had known what I now
know about this med, I would have no doubt been 100% cured years earlier.
I hope this helps.
God Bless, ITN & IDFN,
Dave Fleming


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com



Fri May 4, 2007 3:10 pm

fulltruth40
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #282 of 291 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

Higher dosages/amounts of (DMSO + Fluconazole) are evidently needed, and produce more comprehensive cures, than the very low dosages I've been using and...
Dave Fleming
fulltruth40
Offline Send Email
May 4, 2007
5:04 pm
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help