Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
rosacea-cure · topical DMSO+FLUCONAZOLE to cure rosacea
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Want to share photos of your group with the world? Add a group photo to Flickr.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
[10 water/90% DMSO + 62.5% fluconazole] is "Maximum Strength Med"   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #274 of 291 |
For Everyone,
Here is a recent email between me and "Janey", the first person ever to be
prescribed this med for rosacea in the USA, back in Oct. 2003. Past posts on
the [rosacea-cure] board by "Janey", (her fictitious name), are at:
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/204
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/262

So I am not backing down on my claim that this med is the only known cure for
rosacea/rhinophyma, even though it is decidedly not an "overnight" cure.

In addition, the fact that the use of [DMSO + fluconazole] may lead to the cure
or prevention of all manner of diseases that presently have no known cause, is
amazing to contemplate. The "theory" is that many of these mysterious diseases
may be caused by the effects and cascade effects of "chronic systemic
mycotoxins" secreted into our bloodstream by "stealthy fungal infestations" and
even by "fungal infestations" that are not so stealthy, such as
rosacea/rhinophyma.

This "theory of mechanism" then, would be that [DMSO + fluconazole] destroys the
"fungal infestations", thereby ending the constant, long-term presence of
"chronic mycotoxins" in our bloodstream, which would end any disease condition
caused by the effects of these "chronic mycotoxins". The high probability that
this "theory" is correct, is mind-boggling, to say the least. Wow!!! :-D
God Bless, ITN & IDFN,
Dave Fleming ----TEXT OF EMAILS FOLLOWS----

Dave Fleming wrote:
Hi, Janey,
I just want to say to you, that I really appreciate your continuing updates and
questions, because you are the only person who spoke of God, in our
communication, of all those who have contacted me. Sometimes, I almost feel
guilty, if I gave you the impression that this cure was going to be "quick" or
"easy".
I know that I did not knowingly do that, but I still remember your excitement in
the beginning, and I wanted you to have the best experience with this cure,
rather than having it "drag on" like this. I know that you have admitted that
you stopped using the med many times, (and I understand how that happens,
because I've done the same thing).

Even so, I have always believed, (whether correctly or not), that those with
"mild cases" of rosacea would be cured faster and more easily than I was, with
my horrible beginning stages of rhinophyma.

First, to answer your question, I do not know of anyone being prescribed a
higher percentage than [DMSO + 10% fluconazole]. But I have become convinced
that adding 10% distilled water to the Rx makes it more effective, by
penetrating better, and by putting the maximum amount possible of the med into
the bloodstream.
So I now would recommend [10% water/90% DMSO + 10% fluconazole] to you. Using
the right "measuring tool" from your pharmacy, (I found a cheap syringe
graduated by ml), it isn't that hard to add the 10% steam distilled water
yourself, rather than having to have your doctor change the Rx.

Although Michael Roberge, RPh, promised me the info two months ago, (about June
28), he only got it to me Aug. 26, after he finally did the rather simple
"experiment", to find out the MAXIMUM AMOUNT of fluconazole that will dissolve
in one milliliter of DMSO at room temperature. He has promised to also test, to
find out the maximum amount of fluconazole that will dissolve in one milliliter
of [10% water/90% DMSO], at room temperature. He and I are both guessing that
it will be very similar or identical to the 62.5% figure he's determined for the
100% DMSO, although DMSO is so strange, and so mysterious, that you really
cannot be sure until you actually dissolve the fluconazole in the [10% water/90%
DMSO].
Here is the statement that I finally received from Michael Roberge, RPh:
" I was able to fully dissolve 8.75 gm of Fluconazole in 10 ml of DMSO. This
mixture resulted in a final volume of 14 ml thereby creating a 62.5% solution."

So according to his experimental results, [DMSO + 62.5% fluconazole] is the
highest percentage possible, using the 100% DMSO.
Of course, because of the mystery of how DMSO "transports" the fluconazole
through the skin, we don't actually know that the highest percentage will be the
most effective cure. But it's likely, since I think that you and I are both
convinced that the 10% med is much more effective than the 1% med.

And I believe that you are "right on the beam", when you ask these questions,
about higher percentages of fluconazole, and about ORAL [DMSO + fluconazole].
(That figures, since you started with the 1% med in Oct. 2003, used the 10% med
in 2004, and continue to improve now, in August 2005.) You've been "at this"
longer than anyone except me!
I have suspected that I am indeed "obsessed" with this cure, because the only
answer that comes to my mind, when it does not cure us as quickly as we wish, is
that "we need more of it". So my mind has indeed been going in that direction,
not only of using the highest percentage of fluconazole possible, (e.g. such as
[DMSO + 50% fluconazole), but of "flooding the whole body" with [DMSO +
fluconazole], which would be facilitated by "administering" a rather large
amount.

So, THEORETICALLY, to cure, (or at least start to cure), "ALL POSSIBLE fungal
infestations" in the whole body, one might drink 15 ml of the 10% med, (or 3 ml
of [DMSO + 50% fluconazole]???). The 15 ml of 10% med would contain 1,500 mg of
fluconazole, (as would the 3 ml of [DMSO + 50% fluconazole]), and perhaps as
much as 150 mg of that DMSO-fluconazole, (still bound to the DMSO, so that it
would be 100% effective, as opposed to ineffective ORAL fluconazole alone),
would circulate throughout the body.

Of course, any amount of DMSO we ingest over about 5 ml will most likely give us
the annoyance of the temporary "garlic breath" from the metabolism of the DMSO,
but that's not important, except as information for those taking this.

Then, to push this "theory" further, this dose might even be repeated on a
regular basis, (perhaps once a month, or even more often???). ORAL fluconazole
is known to be very effective partially because it has a very long "half-life"
in the bloodstream. In other words, it takes at least a few days, before it is
metabolized/erased by the body, so even a one-time dose of 150 mg is known to
cure a woman's vaginal candida/yeast infection completely. I assume that
DMSO-fluconazole also has this long half-life in the bloodstream, so I don't
know how much ORALLY ADMINISTERED [DMSO + 10% fluconazole] we might want to
take, over a period of time.

In any case, I assume you've read my r-c post #272, as at:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/272
Because I'm so excited about this "Final Theory of Mechanism", I feel that post
#272 is the most important post of any I have ever placed on the r-c board!!!

And of course, I can't prove this recent expansive "Theory of Mechanism", and it
could be 100% incorrect, which would mean that only the diseases discovered to
be curable so far, such as rosacea/rhinophyma, tinea versicolor, (i.e. "liver
spots"), "ringworm" of the scalp, athelete's foot, and various other
"non-specific" diseases are cured by [DMSO + fluconazole].

But the possible havoc caused by these "chronic systemic mycotoxins" just makes
so much sense to me, and it involves possibly curing, (or at the very least
preventing), all sorts of "idiopathic" diseases, which are diseases that
presently have no known cause. It's truly mind-boggling to me, to contemplate.

This would be an even bigger discovery than penicillin/antibiotics were, to all
mankind, since it MIGHT cure or prevent such diseases as "chronic fatigue
syndrome", or even certain types of cancer, or just a whole long list of
diseases that presently have unknown causes.
Here's a partial list of "idiopathic" diseases I found, (that might actually be
cured or prevented by getting rid of any chronic mycotoxins in our bloodstream):
* Autoimmune disorders:
rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis, Type 1 diabetes, scleroderma,
myasthenia gravis
* Endocrine diseases
* Syndromes and diseases of unknown etiology, or of mixed causes:
Alzheimer's disease, cancer, hypoglycemia, chronic fatigue syndrome, acquired
neuromyotonia (Isaac's syndrome), Guillain-Barre syndrome, Stevens-Johnson
syndrome, Meniere's disease
* Neurological disorders and mental illnesses:
schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, depression, obsessive-compulsive disorder,
eating disorders, dementia
* Psychogenic illness
multiple chemical sensitivity --- "MCS", mass sociogenic illness, ...

And this med is so safe, that anyone, (especially those over age 30 or 40, who
would more likely benefit from it), could ORALLY take a whopping dose of this
med, just to see if they could detect any "changes" in their body or on their
skin, that would tell them that they had any of these "stealthy fungal
infestations". Then, direct topical applications of this med on any skin
infestations might be called for, to cure them completely.

For example, I recently applied more of the 10% med than I ever had before, on a
daily basis, by pouring small amounts of it on my scalp and rubbing it around
with my finger tips, to cure what I assume was a case of "ringworm". It sounds
strange, even to me, but INSIDE my right arm, just below the shoulder, I began
experiencing some pain, only when I moved my arm in a certain way, using a
certain muscle.

Well, any normal person would assume that they "pulled a muscle", but after a
couple of days, it occurred to me that many times in my early life, I was
probably given shots with a hypodermic needle, in the very location that I was
experiencing this "sort of strange" pain. I say "sort of strange", because I do
not remember "pulling the muscle", and it "just so happened" to appear after I
used a lot of the 10% med, for several days in a row, on my scalp.

Incidentally, for at least four or five days, there was a striking "fever", in
the two parts of my scalp with the "ringworm". I never saw it, but I felt it,
and there were two areas with an open wound about a centimeter across. By
reaching my arm up, I could place the inside of my forearm on the area, and only
the "infested" areas were really "hot" with fever, while the rest of my scalp
where I applied the med were normal, which I could actually feel with my arm.
Well, the "ringworm" is gone, and the "strange arm pain" is mostly gone, after a
week or two. And I will perhaps never know, whether there was some parasitical
fungal infestation in my arm that I cured, that had been growing there since it
was placed there by a hypodermic needle jab, perhaps even when I was three years
old, when I went overseas with my parents.
Of course, the "fungal spores" would not have been on the sterile needle, but on
my skin, and "pushed into my arm", when the needle pierced my skin. Even the
classic pre-rub of the skin with a swab dipped in rubbing alcohol, (which is
certainly not always done, before injections), might not have removed such
"fungal spores", since the rubbing alcohol is meant only to kill bacteria that
might be "pushed into" the arm.

One might also ask, "Why no pain in the left arm, since we've all undoubtedly
gotten shots in both arms, at one time or another". But this sort of
"introduction" of "fungal spores" into the body would certainly be a "hit or
miss" situation, whereby not every injection would cause this.

So my belief, is that I reached higher levels of [DMSO + fluconazole] in my
bloodstream than ever before, and it had enough of a "curative effect" to cause
me to notice the "twinge" in my arm muscle, where presumably some sort of
parasitical fungal infestation was growing. Of course, I believe that this same
sort of curative phenomenon, (involving "stealthy fungal infestations" that have
been "introduced" into any part of the body by any breaking of the skin,
surgery, or dental work), will occur for almost everyone over the age of 30 or
40, if they get their bloodstream levels of [DMSO + fluconazole] to a high
enough level.

And that level does not have to be very high.
I used perhaps 7 or 10 ml of the 10% med on my scalp, over a period of perhaps
three or four days. If we say 10 ml, that contained 1,000 mg of fluconazole,
and we know from Dr. Jacob, MD, that most likely less then 10% of the TOPICALLY
APPLIED med goes into the bloodstream. So the total amount of [DMSO +
fluconazole] that entered my bloodstream contained perhaps 100 mg of
fluconazole-DMSO.

So there you have it --- the latest ravings of a cure advocate....
:-D
I pray that you are 100% cured of your rosacea as soon as possible, Janey. And
who knows, you said you also like it for curing athlete's foot too, and higher
strengths of this med may cure you of lots of "other stuff" you don't even know
you have, just as it has in my case, because I've applied so much more of this
med than you ever have. :-D
God Bless, ITN & IDFN,
Dave Fleming
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 04:46:33 +0000
From: "Janey"
To: fulltruth40@... <fulltruth40@...>
Subject: rosacea cure/dmso

Hello Dave,
I know I haven't written in a long time, but not much new to
report. I am still using the 10% fluconazole with slooow improvements. I
read a one of your email about oral Fluconazole/diflucan. What do you think
and have you heard if anybody has been prescribed a higher dose than 10%?
Thank you.
Janey

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]






Sat Sep 3, 2005 3:23 pm

fulltruth40
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #274 of 291 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

For Everyone, Here is a recent email between me and "Janey", the first person ever to be prescribed this med for rosacea in the USA, back in Oct. 2003. Past...
Dave Fleming
fulltruth40
Offline Send Email
Sep 3, 2005
4:01 pm
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help