For Everyone,
More rosaceans than ever before are asking me about this cure for rosacea. I
have done my best to give a current, comprehensive answer here, to cover all
these enquiries. As usual, I have removed the ID of "Joe", in order to
guarantee his protection from the kind of "cyber attacks" that are still being
launched against me....
God Bless, ITN & IDFN,
Dave Fleming ---TEXT OF PRIVATE EMAILS FOLLOWS, (in reverse chronological
order)----

Hi Joe,
Thanks for your vote of confidence, concerning the quality of [rosacea-cure]
posts. Although they do tend to be longer than I would like, I do my best to
not waste anyone's time with the kind of inane or deceptive "chatter" and
obvious, "totally deceptive disguised advertisements" I see on other rosacea
boards.

To begin, perhaps you should read the recent "Advice" r-c post at:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/265
Since this is a complex situation in so many ways, I haven't been able to ever
"condense" this [rosacea-cure] info as much as I would like to.

To answer your question very directly, Joe, I guess my whole point, has been
that EVERYONE who even SUSPECTS that this med even MIGHT help them, should
definitely, without any doubt whatsoever, TRY it. It is an extremely benign
med, that basically has NO effects, unless it is needed, (especially in the very
small amounts applied topically for this treatment/cure).

There are numerous reasons why just about EVERYONE with any suspect skin
problems, (as well as ocular rosacea and some other problems), should definitely
TRY this med, especially if they use the "General Directions" I posted for your
doctor(s) to approve, at:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/210

Here are (9) "points of interest" that may help you decide to TRY this med:

(1) The effect [DMSO + 10% fluconazole] has on "infested" skin tells us whether
we need it or not, with temporary stinging and/or profound temporary changes in
the appearance of the skin.

(Absolutely NO "blisters", and NO "spontaneous bleeding", are involved in this
cure, but those are the LIES being promoted as recently as 11MAY05, by sick,
merciless "rosacea-profiteers".

They are very willing to cause you to have more irreversible skin damage, just
as long as they can continue to maintain the $tatus-quo of their "ro$acea
profit$". They have no mercy for you; later, you should be just as mercile$$ to
them, in court$ of law.

Think about it.
These folks are willing to make these absurd "DMSO damage" claims, even though
they KNOW that anyone with even rudimentary knowledge of the full truth about
[DMSO + fluconazole] KNOWS they are lying. Why are they willing to throw away
whatever good reputation(s) they have, by making such obviously absurd claims?

It's called "BIG BUCKS".
An estimated SIX BILLION DOLLARS in sales annually, (and possibly many, many
BILLIONS OF DOLLARS MORE), will be ENDED by this treatment/cure. So these folks
obviously feel that they have "nothing to lose", because their reputation$ are
worth nothing anyway, after [DMSO + fluconazole] has cured all these previously
incurable, (and extremely profitable), diseases.

So now you know.
I rarely have felt the need to SPECIFICALLY debunk, (point by point), any of
these truly ridiculous "[DMSO + fluconazole] damage" claims, other than to point
out that they are either totally unsubstantiated, or totally irrelevant, as I
have made crystal clear at:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/244
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/245
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/246
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/248
With two additional pertinent posts at:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/249
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/258

Rosaceans, (especially those with rhinophyma), should bring future lawsuits
against these folks, for the prolongation of suffering they are causing. And
those with other diseases curable with [DMSO + fluconazole] should also bring
such lawsuits.

Healthy skin is virtually totally unaffected by this med.
Contrary to the lies that "rosacea-profiteers" have been promoting, the eyes are
also totally safe, when this med is applied topically to the face and even
inside the nose and mouth. Obviously, doctors are prescribing [DMSO + 10%
fluconazole] for rosacea, and if there were any conceivable way for the systemic
DMSO to cause any "corneal damage", it would not be prescribed.
"Rosacea-profiteers" are obviously aiming their lies about this AT THOSE
DOCTORS, (as well as at innocent rosaceans), who might be totally ignorant of
the full truth about DMSO, to try to "scare" them, into NOT writing this [DMSO +
10% fluconazole] prescription.

But doctors who know the full truth continue to write these prescriptions,
ABSOLUTELY PROVING "by default" that these "scare tactic" claims are TOTALLY
FALSE, and are in fact intended to extend the "profit time" of
"rosacea-profiteers".

After all, each year they can delay this cure from "going wide", another SIX
BILLION DOLLARS in sales goes into their pockets. That's an estimated
$16,438,356.00 per EACH DAY of delay they can cause. Of course, each
"rosacea-profiteer" sells far less than $16 million a day, but that's the trough
they dip their snouts in, EVERY SINGLE DAY. :-(

Furthermore, the same identical, stale, lame, unsubstantiated FALSE claims have
been made since SEPTEMBER 2004!!! And that was after SIXTEEN MONTHS of
SUPPRESSIVE SILENCE, on the [rosacea-support] board, (from MAY 2003 to SEPT.
2004). My guess, is that they finally started to see their "rosacea profits"
going down, down, down, by SEPT. 2004.

If there were even a shred of truth to this absurd claim of "damage by [DMSO +
fluconazole]", don't you think some NEW claim(s) would have been made, IN THE
LAST EIGHT MONTHS, since this false slur claim was first put on the
[rosacea-support] and [rosaceans] boards by PASCOE, NASE, BARROWS, ET AL??? And
of course, they have never allowed any truth from me, (or from anyone),
debunking these absurd claims, to post at [rosacea-support] or [rosaceans].

But every day that passes, more and more USA doctors are prescribing [DMSO +
fluconazole], for rosacea, and for many other diseases. :-D

And absolutely disproving these lies about "DMSO eye damage", doctors have, (for
at least the last couple of years!!!), even been prescribing EYE DROPS with
6.25% DMSO content plus other ingredients, to prevent/treat/cure cataracts of
the eyes, especially in the elderly.
I look forward to EYE DROPS being formulated with DMSO and fluconazole, and
prescribed specifically for OCULAR ROSACEA, to be used IN ADDITION to [DMSO +
10% fluconazole] applied topically on the face.

(2) Amazingly, NO "diagnosis" is needed.
You don't even have to know what "disease" you have, to be cured with [DMSO +
10% fluconazole]. From my experience, many of the diseases curable with this
med don't even have a specific name, except that they are habitually all
arbitrarily given "one name" by "white coats" who refuse to admit that they
don't actually have the foggiest notion, of what the ROOT CAUSE(S) of these
diseases, (such as rosacea), might be.

A recent post by a SEEMINGLY amiable/helpful "rosacea-profiteer" is emphasizing
that "rosacea" is actually a "range" of different diseases. Duhh! Is he just
trying to deceptively justify his continuing, long-term refusal to advocate that
all rosaceans should TRY [DMSO + 10% fluconazole]? He knows that if they try
it, he will lose his "rosacea-business" overnight. So you should ask yourself,
"Does he want to deceive rosaceans, to stop them from TRYING this med, so that
he can continue to make money from rosacea?"

To delay/stop the establishment of this treatment/cure, we would expect that
"rosacea-profiteers" would be very crafty, and attempt to mask their betrayal of
rosaceans with whatever "smoke screens", "scare tactics", and general deceptions
they can produce.

You should not make the mistake of believing any ongoing deceptive, selfish
silence and denial, concerning the revolutionary curative reality of [DMSO + 10%
fluconazole].... And contrary to the continuing "rosacea profiteer"
screaming/claim(s) you might hear, absolutely NO "general rosacea research" is
necessary for this med to cure 100% of all rosacea.

Brady Lee Barrows claims that any money you "donate" to his "ro$acea re$earch"
will not benefit him in any way.... Right.... And if you believe that, there's a
bridge in Manhattan I'd like to sell you....

(3) Since this med has been curing a wide range of different types of
"infestations" that have been previously incurable since time immemorial, it is
only wise to TRY it. It's hard to establish "absolute proof" of these cures,
but I think that Dr. Syrokomsky's work might be entirely honest, and might very
well be a good example of [DMSO + fluconazole] use.

My most "informative" post on Dr. Syrokomsky is at:
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/262
And the rest of the Dr. Syrokomsky posts, (and his website), follow:
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/258
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/260
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/261
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/264
http://www.dr.syrokomsky.com
http://www.dr.syrokomsky.com/eng-page31.html
http://www.dr.syrokomsky.com/eng-page313.html
http://www.dr.syrokomsky.com/eng-page314.html
http://www.dr.syrokomsky.com/eng-page315.html
http://www.dr.syrokomsky.com/eng-page5.html

I recently repeatedly asked Brady Lee Barrows in about five different private
emails to have the common courtesy to give me his "best opinion", of Dr.
Syrokomsky's cure(s), which are proven by the photo evidence the doctor has
posted at his website, evidently for at least the last four years.
Mr. Barrows slyly refused, and each time stated, "I don't know". Although Mr.
Barrows admitted that he's been aware of Dr. Syrokomsky's cure claims photo
evidence since 2001, (and linked it to his website, to help Mr. Barrows make
money), he pointedly refused all five times to state any opinion to me about
this doctor's cures. Mr. Barrows' dogged repetition of his "I don't know"
speaks volumes, amounting to the classic "no comment" dodge we've all heard....

Mr. Barrows also made it clear that, (for four years!!!), he's never even tried
to find out how Dr. Syrokomsky is curing rosacea --- How strange, since Mr.
Barrows always claims that he wants so much to help rosaceans. Hmmmmmm.
It is becoming more and more obvious to me, that Mr. Brady Lee Barrows doesn't
WANT to know, if a cure for rosacea does exist, except that he wants to use it
to cure himself, of course....

(4) The "infestations" causing rosacea may cause some irreversible damage to
our skin that [DMSO + 10% fluconazole] does not restore, even though the skin is
obviously healthy after this cure. So the longer we delay "killing" this
"rosacea causing entity" with [DMSO + 10% fluconazole], the more irreversible
damage will be done to our skin.

"Rosacea-profiteers" who have deceptively misled rosaceans to NOT TRY [DMSO +
fluconazole] should be brought into courts of law at some future time, in order
to ask the classic question, "What did they know, and when did they know it?".
The answer to this question should determine their prison sentence, or at the
very least, how much they should pay for the prolongation of suffering, (even
including suicides), they have caused.

(5) In much, (and it appears MOST of the world), this med, (or the easily mixed
two ingredients), is available without any prescription being required, which
pretty much proves that it is quite benign, (although it can have some temporary
unsightly "positive, long-term-healing reactions", ONLY on diseased skin).

This unsightly temporary "curative pinkness and peeling skin" is certainly MUCH
less problematic than the unsightliness caused by many of the so-called
"treatments/controls",

[including the so-called "bruising", (i.e. BURNS), of laser/IPL],

that are currently considered to be perfectly acceptable by the
"$$$ medical community $$$". But these "approved treatments/controls" always
somehow guarantee that
you will have to come back in the future, to spend
more of your money.

[DMSO + 10% fluconazole], on the other hand, appears to be getting rid of the
ROOT CAUSE of these diseases, even though it is not an "overnight"
treatment/cure.

(6) By USA standards, at least, this med is cheap. And it promises to get even
more inexpensive, as time goes on, especially in those parts of the world where
it is legal to mix this med up at home, as explained at:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/170
A few milliliters of DMSO cost practically nothing.
And Pfizer's patent on Diflucan/fluconazole ended over a year ago, so scores of
worldwide manufacturers/suppliers of high-quality generic fluconazole are now
competing to supply fluconazole much more cheaply than ever before.... :-D

(7) According to proven past studies, we know that about 10% or less of this
med passes through the skin and enters our bloodstream. I have spoken
personally with Dr. Stanley Jacob, MD, about the specific, proven reality of
this "less than 10% systemic transport" figure of (under 3,000 atomic weight
molecule) substances mixed with DMSO and applied to the skin topically.

That means that this med has a "whole body effect" potential, that may very well
cure "stealthy infestations" that we are not even aware that we have. I spoke
about this some, at:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/193

When I first applied [DMSO + 1% fluconazole] to my big toes, (for nail fungus),
I felt some very mild "sensations" in my eyes, and I later, (about 18 months
later!), came to realize that the extremely small amount of this med that
entered my bloodstream through my toes, was curing rudimentary ocular rosacea
that I didn't even know that I had. These eye "sensations" stopped occurring
very soon thereafter, (because my ocular rosacea was cured?), no matter how much
med I was applying to my face.

Another "theory" that I've been led to, is that the "intestinal polyps" that are
known to "develop" into colon cancer, MIGHT also be "stopped/disarmed" by the
[DMSO + fluconazole] that enters our bloodstream when we apply this med only to
our face.

(8) You say,
>"My rosacea really seems to come on when my body is stressed,
>like it is a total body problem not my just facial skin."

Since there are some hard to prove "biological cascade effects" involving our
immune systems that appear to be involved, the SYMPTOMS of these skin diseases,
(i.e. rosacea), can be quite impossible to "pin down". Since our immune system
appears to be involved in fairly complex ways, (both in our disease, and in this
cure), fluctuations in our body's "biological balance" can cause the VISIBLE,
EXTERNAL SYMPTOMS to fool us. But this med clearly appears to be cutting
through all that, and "attacking" the ROOT CAUSE of these skin diseases.

I tried to explain my "theory" about some of this, at:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/225
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/232

(9) Although I have only "anecdotal evidence" for my "theory" about this, that
does not mean there is anything unsound about this "theory". It is sound, and
even common sense leads us to believe this "theory" is most likely correct.

And in any case, this med is curative, even if my "theory" is incorrect, about
how it is doing the curing.

In fact, it is quite possible that we might NEVER know, (or need to know), how
this med works, even after it has cured 100% of all rosacea.

That's why it is such a LIE, to claim that "general rosacea research is needed"
NOW.
Of course, "rosacea-profiteers" would naturally be motivated to do "rosacea
research", if a cure for rosacea appeared. That's the only way they could
"muddy the water" and most effectively try to stop rosaceans from discovering
that new cure for rosacea.

So if you wonder why all the CURRENT screaming for "rosacea research" is being
put out by groups, (owned by "rosacea-profiteers"), that have existed for many,
many years WITHOUT that screaming, now you know; look around for a cure, because
that would explain why they are screaming for this "cover-up rosacea research"
NOW.

And you should try [DMSO + 10% fluconazole] first, to save time in your search
for that cure. :-D

I sure do hope this helps. :-)
God Bless, ITN & IDFN,
Dave Fleming
x==x==x==x==x==x==x==x==x==x==x==x

From: "Joe"
To: fulltruth40@...
Date: Mon, 16 May 2005
Subject: Great Posts

Hello Dave,
Thank you for the great posts. I have been suffering with rosacea for
about two years now and it seems to be getting worse.
I am on ovace, metro and antibiotics, they dont work very well.
I really want to try [DMSO + 10% fluconazole, but I'm not sure it is for me.
My rosacea really seems to come on when my body is stressed,
like it is a total body problem not my just facial skin.
When I am tired it is really bad or when I am anxious or embarrassed.
The sun makes me really red or heat.
Only recently have I been waking up with a redish color, it is really
disheartening.
I really dont have to bad of bumps yet. I guess what I
am wondering is should I give this a try.
Any info would be much appreciated
Thanks
Joe


---------------------------------
Discover Yahoo!
Find restaurants, movies, travel & more fun for the weekend. Check it out!

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]