Hi, FHG,
As you may know, I suffered with progressively worse rosacea for about 20 years,
so it is my extreme pleasure to try to help about two hundred million rosaceans,
with news of the first true cure for rosacea ever to be discovered.
The garlic-like odor that is produced in the lungs when large amounts of simple
DMSO are taken orally, or on huge areas of the body for arthritis, or for deep
tissue injuries, is completely absent when you are using the very small amounts
of (DMSO + fluconazole/Diflucan) needed to cure rosacea. If you look at
rosacea-cure message #189, there is a link there where it states that 5 to 15 ML
of simple DMSO is the normal dosage used, but the dosage of [FLUCONAZOLE 1%
SOLUTION], (applied with a q-tip), is far less than one ML, which does not
produce any noticeable odor. My experience, even when I have applied as much as
3 or 4 ML, (with a q-tip), over a four hour time span, to my face, is that there
was zero odor.
If you want to see an example of what I consider to be an obvious attempt at
disinformation by a well-liked MD who until recently did everything she could,
to discredit this cure for rosacea, see:
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/46>
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/96>
This doctor recently mysteriously "disengaged herself" from her considerable
activity at the "rosacea-knowledge group board", when she was accused of
possible duplicity.

Friends of this doctor are still quoting the disinformation she put out, and the
"rosacea-support Moderators" are selectively posting only untrue/slanted
negative info, on the "rosacea-support group board", recently, about me, and
about DMSO. You need only put in a search there for "DMSO", to see their most
recent lies and disinformation about this situation. For some mysterious
reason, you cannot search more than about 200 messages there, so you have to
click on "Next" about 250 times to try to search their entire archive!!!
However, just above the "Fastcounter" on the home page, find the term "escribe
archive", and click on it. Then, I think you can search the entire past at one
time. It is very revealing, since they banned me, and any mention of this cure
for rosacea, since May 2003. Be advised though, that they are able to more
easily manipulate the escribe archive, since the telltale number of any deleted
message is not evident, as it is in the Yahoo! archive.
There is an easily exposed example of disinformation, at:
<http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-support/message/56400>
They claim that I am promoting simple DMSO as the "cure for rosacea", but they
know very well, that it is DMSO-fluconazole, as is in the Subject Heading, at:
<http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-knowledge/message/1937>
(If r-k does not delete this by the time you check it.)
Of course, they know that it is impossible for me to reply to this
disinformation, as they have maintained the ban on me since May 2003, even
though I never broke any rules at the "rosacea-support group board".
There is another subtle truth here, which you have not asked about, but I am
sure you would want to know. There are references here and there, that DMSO
MAY, (and I repeat, "MAY"), cause skin irritation.
This is mentioned, at:
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/159>
Why do these sources not simply say that DMSO DOES cause skin irritation in all
cases? My well-educated theory on this, is that there are many "stealthy",
(i.e. hard to detect), diseases/infestations of the skin, that may only become
evident upon the application of DMSO. Mistakenly, this is interpreted as an
irritation caused by the DMSO, when, in fact, the DMSO has simply made the
infestation visible.
It is generally recognized, that DMSO has little or no effect on healthy skin,
so trying to explain these "irritations" is difficult, without referring to
something like "an allergic reaction", or a mysterious "irritation", or the use
of too large a dose. I believe that the truth of this matter is very simple;
DMSO has some effect on these stealthy skin infestations, which causes them to
become visible, although I do not believe that the DMSO alone can cure them. It
is the mixture of (DMSO + fluconazole/Diflucan), that I believe has the ability
to cure perhaps even a very wide range of skin infestations, and one of those is
rosacea, (although rosacea may be caused by more than one type of infestation,
all of which are curable by this [DMSO + fluconazole/Diflucan] mixture)!!!!!!!
In fact, one of the many listed possible "side effects" of ORAL
fluconazole/Diflucan, is "exfoliative skin disorders", as you find at:
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/111>
Here again, I belive that the ORAL fluconazole/Diflucan partially "attacks"
these stealthy skin infestations but the "partial killing" of the infestation is
mistakenly interpreted as some unexplainable side effect of the ORAL
fluconazole/Diflucan.
However, because these infestations of the skin are so deeply, integrally
embedded in the skin, repetitive, prolonged treatments are needed, and I believe
that ORAL fluconazole/Diflucan is far, far too toxic to the body to allow the
amount needed, for a cure of rosacea. Once again, it is only the strangely
effective mixture of (DMSO + fluconazole/Diflucan), that has the ability to
concentrate the fluconazole/Diflucan at the site of topical application, without
subjecting the entire body to any toxic dosage of the fluconazole/Diflucan.
But I digress.
Sadly, this is not a "miracle" cure, nor is it an "overnight" cure, nor is it
even an "easy" cure. That said, it is all we have, if we want to get rid of our
rosacea, rather than just temporarily "controlling/suppressing" rosacea
symptoms, usually at the cost of substantial side effects.
Since no one has ever had rosacea at less than the age of 16, there is very good
reason to believe that these stealthy skin infestations may require ten or even
twenty years of growth in the skin, before any "rosacea symptoms" appear, which
may actually be indirect cascade effects involving the immune system.
Therefore, although this treatment/cure is not "easy", we can be confident that
killing the infestation is well worth our discomfort and effort, because it will
be many years indeed, before it could present us with rosacea symptoms again.
Also, by applying this med, we have the means of "testing", every year, or every
five years, to find out if any stealthy "re-infestation" is occurring, and
kill/cure it again, even before any rosacea symptoms occur.
The question of "presentability" of our face in public, is a difficult one to
answer completely, because each person is in different stages of rosacea, and
the definition of "presentable" differs considerably, from person to person. For
example, I think your name is a man's name, so you would normally be less
"sensitive" about your appearance than a woman might be about hers.
My rosacea was in a final stage, with pustules on my nose. I honestly do not
remember exactly how long I "hid at home", but it was at least a couple of
weeks, but I applied this med many, many times, and multiple times per day.
This is probably not necessary to do, although applying it less often probably
means the overall time to a 100% cure might be longer. But who cares about
that, as long as the final 100% cure outcome is the same?
So, as a man, I believe you need to carefully prepare, and obtain some sort of
cover-up makeup, as well as the "anti-inflammatory, anti-wrinkle cream" that I
recommend, at:
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rosacea-cure/message/187>
The "concealer" that I mention in rosacea-cure message #187, would probably be
good for a man, but it would be better to have a concealer in a tube or a jar,
since the kind that I listed is in a small, pen-sized bottle, with a small
brush, which limits the amount you can easily apply.
It is acceptable for a woman to wear makeup, but unless a man is in show
business, or on TV, it is usually considered very odd for him to wear makeup.
Therefore, the "concealer", which does not cover, but does "tone down" the
pinkness of the skin, may be better for a man than any makeup.
With my advanced rosacea, about half of my nose turned a bright, cherry red, the
first time I applied this med. If this is the case with you, you might not be
"presentable" by Monday morning. But surely you could minimize the problem,
with the cream and concealer I've mentioned, and simply tell the persons that
matter, that you are undergoing a medical procedure which is completely
temporary.
If your rosacea is not as advanced as mine was, and you only apply this med one
time, I believe that the effect would be minimal, and might not be even
noticeable to anyone on Monday.
So, I hope this info is helpful, and I hope you start getting rid of your
rosacea soon. Especially if your doctor witnesses your treatment/cure, your
experience will help convince millions of rosaceans find out that a true cure
for rosacea has been discovered.
God Bless,
Dave Fleming

>FHG wrote:
>To: fulltruth40
>Subject: A couple of questions about Diflucan
>Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2003
>
>Dave,
>
> I appreciate your efforts to educate and help those
>of us suffering with rosacea. From the research I
>have done on this subject, DMSO usually caused a bad
>odor in the breath. Did this happen to you?
> Secondly, I have a career which demands that I be in
>the public eye daily, except for my 'weekends'. How
>long would I be unpresentable after an application of
>Diflucan. If I applied it after work on Friday, would
>I be back in business by Monday morning?
> Thanks for your efforts.
>
>FHG


---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the "Signing Bonus" Sweepstakes

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]