Skip to search.

Breaking News Visit Yahoo! News for the latest.

×Close this window

rochesterNYwestonaprice · Rochester NY - Weston A Price Chapter

The Yahoo! Groups Product Blog

Check it out!

Group Information

? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Hear how Yahoo! Groups has changed the lives of others. Take me there.

Messages

Advanced
Messages Help
Messages 689 - 718 of 1693   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Show Message Summaries Sort by Date ^  
#689 From: Happy Hooves Organic Farm <farmserf@...>
Date: Mon Nov 1, 2010 5:07 pm
Subject: Turkeys, Chickens and Happy Monday
farmserf
Send Email Send Email
 
Happy Monday!

  It's gotten a bit cold out. We saw  snow here yesterday.

  The hens have been gradually making their way up to  the barn from their
outback

  adventure this summer. They are happy to find their old  winter spots  in the
  barn.

  The chickens that are  left have had their outdoor  shelters tightened up and
  bedded with straw to keep them warm  and comfy  until they meet the butcher on
  November 20th along with the  turkeys. This  also has helped to deter that
nasty

  hawk that took 2 of my hens  last week.  Migratory birds my eye!

  The cows are now being allowed  back in the barn  since it's gotten so cold. We

  were cleaning it out and fixing  up gates and  getting it ready yesterday. They

  knew what we were up to  somehow and stood  outside that back door mooing at us

  until we finished and  opened the door  for them. I love to stand in the barn
and

  listen to them all  munching on  hay. It's just as soothing as watching the
free

  range chickens  scratching at  the ground. What were calves last year are way
too

  big to be  going to the  calf side this year, but they didn't seem to know it
and

  so  reeked havoc on  the creep gate trying to get back over there. The calves
from

  this year have  never been in the barn before and so even with persuasion would

  not go in.  Sigh...

  Well, this is to remind you that fresh turkeys  will be ready  beginning
November

  20th. That is a Saturday just before  Thanksgiving. They  should be ready after

  4:00 that day. There is still room for  some  reservations if you want one, but

  don't dilly-dally. Last year a  number of  people missed out because they
waited

  until the last minute. I  do expect to  be making a run to just East of Webster
to

  deliver some so that  Rochester  folks don't all have to drive way over here to

  get theirs.  Exact time has  yet to be determined, but it will be "late" I'm
sure.

  A big  help will be the  new cooler we are building that will allow us to hold
  fresh  meats without  ice and lots of little coolers.

  Also on  November 20th we will  process the last of the chickens, all heritage
  breed chickens.  We still have  nice Cornish Cross chickens in the freezer in a

  wide variety of  sizes. If  you're up to more poultry that day, buy it then.
After

  Thanksgiving we will  raise the price of chickens to help pay for the
electricity

  to  keep them  frozen.

  Please feel free to call or email me  if you have any  questions. Now that I've

  got the house phone forwarded to my  cell phone most  of the time I can take
your

  call even if I'm outside, barring  the occasional  lapse in my memory when I go

  out without it!

Della Jastrzab
@ Happy Hooves Organic Farm
13054 Ira Station Rd
Martville, NY 13111
315-626-6770
All our animals are raised naturally on pasture.
http://www.betterbeef4u.com
Happy Cows Make Better Beef.
Our Cows Smile All The Time.
Certified Organic by NOFA-NY Certified Organic, LLC

#690 From: Elizabeth Raduns <ellie.raduns@...>
Date: Tue Nov 2, 2010 11:01 pm
Subject: RE:FW: 5--.
ellie.raduns...
Send Email Send Email
 
I have a good information to share with you.
A while ago,a trading company attractive to me,
the price is very competitive advantage, so I bought some products.
It is very exciting,very pleased when I got and saw my goods.
I think you can go to see:  nowfid.com
you'll save more money in there. 5--.

#691 From: Elizabeth Raduns <ellie.raduns@...>
Date: Wed Nov 3, 2010 12:22 am
Subject: Sorry my email got spammed...
ellie.raduns...
Send Email Send Email
 


--
Ellie Raduns
Sweet Pea, Owner
585.815.6001
17 Montclair Ave
Batavia, NY 14020
www.sweetpeaconsulting.com

Blogs subscriptions available:
http://alternativecooking.blogspot.com
http://radunsfamily.blogspot.com

#692 From: helene stotz <my_bba@...>
Date: Thu Nov 4, 2010 1:27 am
Subject: farmers thots
my_bba
Send Email Send Email
 
I loved reading the post about the farm happenings. If anyone else wants to share recent events and reflections of their farm/garden I'd love to read it too. I know u all are busy but now that the cooler weather is setting in perhaps more time is available?
Thanks,
Hélène


#693 From: "Scott" <scottfearing@...>
Date: Mon Nov 8, 2010 3:02 pm
Subject: WWXI Forum to address Obesity
scottfearing
Send Email Send Email
 
*Seems like they could use a WPF perspective on the panel ;-)
---
Please consider being in our audience - and feel free to share this
information with colleagues, family and friends.

WXXI Healthy You Forum on Child Health

Child Obesity is one of the area's biggest health concerns.
Join us to find out more about child obesity --- its prevalence and
causes in our community. And learn about community resources to help
keep you and your family healthy.

Be part of a studio audience for Healthy You: The Rochester Childhood
Obesity Epidemic. Come with questions for a panel of experts in WXXI
Studios.

What: Healthy You Childhood Health Forum:
When: Thursday, November 18, 2010 7pm-8pm
Where: WXXI Studios, 280 State Street, Rochester, NY.

You will be part of a studio audience for this important community
event.

WXXI panel of experts:
Dr. Stephen Cook, Asst. Professor, Pediatrics, University of
Rochester Medical Center
Dr. Lisa Harris, Pediatric Internist, Rochester, NY
Bonney DeVinney, Vice President and Chief Program Officer, Greater
Rochester Health Foundation.
Wade Norwood: Finger Lakes Healthy Systems Agency
Jennifer Carr: Parent


There are 100 available slots for this studio audience. Please RSVP
as soon as possible. The event is free, but requires an RSVP.

Contact:Shelley Figueroa at sfigueroa@... or call (585) 258-0278.

Hope to see you there.  THANKS.

Shelley Figueroa
Coordinator, Education & Outreach
The Educational Outreach Center
WXXI Public Broadcasting
P.O. Box 30021
280 State Street (14614)
Rochester, NY 14603-3021
(585) 258-0278

"Do something for somebody every day for which you don't get paid"
Albert Schweitzer

#694 From: Phillip Cook <pilgrimsongs@...>
Date: Mon Nov 8, 2010 11:21 pm
Subject: Full Meat and Produce CSA Keuka Lake area. Deliverys possible
pilgrimsongs
Send Email Send Email
 
     Our Shepherds Farm is preparing to go into the full time custom Meat, Produce, Honey, small fruits CSA type deal. To do this we have some high expenses to cover up front, so our costs will bring you some super returns on this investment. The deal is this.  You purchase a seven year Share for $1750.00. We pay a nice 33.6% interest on this mortgage like share. You then place your order for any of our offerings for the following year from our price list. (Term fixed prices will be given you BEFORE) you buy your share. You go through the order form, and order whatever you desire, to an amount of $575.00 each year for the next seven years. You may order extra at a the regular price, and either take it of of future principle of the share, or pay additional slightly higher costs for the extras. (still lower then super market) We will deliver the products as they are available to a location nearer to your home.
    Your total return (if you do not take from the principle early) will be $4025.00 worth of goods.  We are putting provisions into place to return any remaining principle in the event of an illness, or death preventing the term of products to be full filled. 
    What do you need to do to learn more? Email me with your snail mail address and we will send you a brochure including the price, and description of what we will raise. 
Bonus. the shares this time will include two (one week of stay at our farm cottage) for a truly different vacation.
    As I said, the farm is ready for us to push ahead as we now plan to retire to this project that we have been working towards for now, seventeen years. We need a little more cash up front to be sure that your food will be of the highest nutrient quality we can possibly produce. The soils are almost in nutrient balance, and the previous owners mismanagement is almost completely cleaned up. All meats are pasture grazing, produced. Veggies, small fruit, and those herbs we will grow, are all on healthy soil infested by the essential microbes, and earthworms.
Email us now, to get your order in in time for next years crop of food. 
 
PS we will be using a cold cellar to allow you to receive such products as will keep through the winter into the following spring.
PPS. Finally We must receive enough shares to make this move forward possible. Further we will not go over a certain number to assure you that we can meet the demand. In the event that you place an order, and send a check to us, we will not cash it, until our number needed is complete. If we do not receive enough orders we will simply return your uncashed check.

#695 From: "mikeyiscute" <Mikeyiscute@...>
Date: Mon Nov 15, 2010 3:04 pm
Subject: Anyone have milk kefir grains to spare?
mikeyiscute
Send Email Send Email
 
Hoping someone on the west side might have some milk kefir grains to spare.  I'm
going to try making coconut milk kefir!

--Erin

#696 From: "Laura Villanti" <laurav@...>
Date: Tue Nov 16, 2010 1:57 pm
Subject: URGENT ACTION ALERT ON FOOD SAFETY LEGISLATION
lauravillanti
Send Email Send Email
 

All - we need to make the phone calls NOW to help protect our local farmers and food supply.  This is the final push and the most important calls in this long legislative process.

Please call today to protect your food supply.

Thanks,

Laura Villanti
Chapter Leader, Rochester NY - Weston A Price Foundation

URGENT ACTION ALERT ON FOOD SAFETY LEGISLATION

The Senate is coming back for the lame duck session, and the Food Safety Modernization Act (S.510) is scheduled for a cloture vote this week. We have asked you to take action on this issue several times this year, and now were in the final push. It is critical that you call your Senators NOW to urge them to amend or oppose S.510!

S.510 greatly expands FDAs authority over both processed foods and fresh fruits and vegetables, and would give FDA authority to impose extensive, burdensome requirements on even the smallest processing facilities and farms that sell to local consumers.

We need the Tester-Hagan amendment to protect our vulnerable local food producers!

TAKE ACTION

Please call BOTH of your Senators. You can find their contact information at www.Senate.gov or by calling the Capitol Switchboard at 202-224-3121.

Urge your Senators to amend or oppose S.510, and specifically to:

1) SUPPORT the TESTER-HAGAN AMENDMENT to prevent the imposition of new federal regulations on small-scale, direct-marketing producers.

2) OPPOSE any amendment to add criminal penalties to S.510.

As it is currently written, S.510 would make our food supply LESS safe by harming local producers, increasing our reliance on imported foods due to the burden on domestic producers, and giving FDA new powers without holding the agency accountable for its failures.

TALKING POINTS

1. Small, local food producers have not contributed to the highly publicized foodborne illness outbreaks and should not be subjected to extensive new federal regulation. Although S. 510 includes some provisions that call for flexibility, the bills current language still imposes extensive new requirements on even the smallest farmers and food producers. State and local regulation have already proven to be enough for local food producers; we dont need new federal regulations.

2. Increased regulations and record-keeping obligations could destroy small businesses that bring both jobs and food to local communities. In this time of economic hardship, we need more local food businesses! Congress should work to reduce regulatory burdens on them, not increase them.

3. Food safety and security both come from a diversified, vibrant local food system. Local foods give consumers the choice to buy from producers they know, creating a transparent, accountable food system without federal government oversight.

4. Additional FDA regulation is counterproductive. FDA has not used its existing authority well. Instead of focusing its resources on the problems posed by imported foods and large processing facilities, FDA has chosen to target small processors. While approving unlabeled GMOs to enter our food supply, it has opposed raw milk and interfered with the free choice of informed adults who want access to this healthy food. Simply giving FDA increased authority and power will not improve the food supply unless Congress requires the agency to focus on Agribusiness and not small, local producers.

5. Increased regulation of our domestic food suppliers will lead to greater dependence on imported foods, harming both our economy and our security. The bill will create incentives for retailers to import more food from other countries, because it will burden family farms and small business and because it will be practically impossible to hold foreign food facilities to the same standards and inspections. The bill will create a considerable competitive disadvantage for ALL U.S. agriculture and food production (see analysis at http://ftcldf.org/news/news-20Oct2009-2.html).

6. S.510 does not address many of the fundamental problems with our food. The bill does not cover the factory livestock farms that are the source of dangerous E. coli 0157:H7, nor does it address issues such as BPA, pesticide and herbicide contamination, GMOs, or the many other contaminants that impact our health. It is not productive to focus on bacterial contamination and nothing else.


#697 From: "Phillip; The Bee Guy" <pilgrimsongs@...>
Date: Tue Nov 16, 2010 5:16 pm
Subject: Buy one or more seven year shares in OUR SHEPHERDS FARM to receive healthy foods
pilgrimsongs
Send Email Send Email
 

     By request we are offering our seven year shares of (healthy raised) meats, grains, veggies, small fruits, and more. in smaller share sizes.   A single share will be now just $500, and those holding one will still order the desired products from a list, for delivery the following year. Each share will return $151.92 worth of food per year for seven years. This is a return on you money invested of 25%. Your total return will then be $1062.50 over the full seven year term of the share. 

      We are making this limited offer available to attain the moneys needed to bring the farm completly on line. In the future the share interest values will be much lower and yearly in nature. So this one time you have an exceptional opportunity to feed your family or yourself  (healthy) at a reduced cost.

      All of our products are produced on soils which are being brought completly into balance, with organic type methods. None of our soils nor our animals are contaminated by antibiotics, or any of the manufactured cides. The soil has a full complimant of  the required microbes essential to producing healthy crops. All products will be delivered to a central area nearer your home for pickup. And though we may not sell you dairy anything... Call, text, or email for the additional information complete with all dollar values of the foods we custom produce for your order each year. And yes your order must be in very soon, if you desire to have food from this program next year, or maybe at all.


#698 From: Jen Reschke <jenerin78@...>
Date: Tue Nov 23, 2010 1:44 pm
Subject: turnips
jereschke
Send Email Send Email
 
Hi everyone,
I received about 50lbs of turnips from a local farmer friend. Any ideas of what to do with them? Can you lactoferment turnips and do they taste good? How long will they store? Any ideas are much appreciated!
Thanks!
jen

--
Love flowers best in openness and freedom.
~ Edward Abbey


#699 From: elizabeth benner <elizabethmerzbenner@...>
Date: Tue Nov 23, 2010 3:19 pm
Subject: lacto-ferm. turnips
elizabethmer...
Send Email Send Email
 
I enjoyed them fermented.  I followed recipe in N. Trad.    Also I like them mixed in w/mashed potatoes,  and google a recipe for colocann -- a trad. Irish dish that has variations of using turnips in it- yummy too.
 
In my colocann I sauted onions, garlic in 8 T.  butter & bacon fat.  Then add in kale, turnips, potatoes, some broth to thin - then add creme, s & p.  I add snipped dried chives atop.   Mine ends up being like a very thick soup puree of sorts.  I always serve it at Halloween time & St. Paddys.  But other times too!


#700 From: "lizzietijuanaiguana" <lizzietijuanaiguana@...>
Date: Tue Nov 23, 2010 7:37 pm
Subject: next baby step?
lizzietijuan...
Send Email Send Email
 
I have been soaking our rice 12-24 hours b4 cooking and don't believe I'll go
back.

What's a next step I can do? We TRY to get entirely organic (barring hubby's
escapades with junk food).

I put together a different apple crisp w/3 ingredients. (forgot spices bc I was
focused on no sugar).

2/3 cup coconut
2/3 cup finely grated coconut
1 egg
4 apples

Did bc I was craving macaroons.

Turned out rather tasty oh coconut was unsweetened.

Thanks for any ideas,
Michele

#701 From: Ryan Platte <ryan@...>
Date: Tue Nov 23, 2010 7:40 pm
Subject: Re: next baby step?
ryanplatte
Send Email Send Email
 
Hi Michele, good to hear from you. 

What are your biggest goals? What are your biggest frustrations or regrets?

Ryan Platte
Bootstrap Acres, Rochester NY
http://bootstrapacres.com/
(585) 789-1328



On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 2:37 PM, lizzietijuanaiguana <lizzietijuanaiguana@...> wrote:
 

I have been soaking our rice 12-24 hours b4 cooking and don't believe I'll go back.

What's a next step I can do? We TRY to get entirely organic (barring hubby's escapades with junk food).

I put together a different apple crisp w/3 ingredients. (forgot spices bc I was focused on no sugar).

2/3 cup coconut
2/3 cup finely grated coconut
1 egg
4 apples

Did bc I was craving macaroons.

Turned out rather tasty oh coconut was unsweetened.

Thanks for any ideas,
Michele



#702 From: "Phillip; The Bee Guy" <pilgrimsongs@...>
Date: Tue Nov 23, 2010 11:30 pm
Subject: Re: Our custom raised Pre paid food orders. Reduced amounts, large variety
pilgrimsongs
Send Email Send Email
 
Email your address for a completly free, no strings attached flyer on our pre- purchased foods, fresh from  our "organic style" farm. I will send you the information on the offer, (hopefully we have covgered up the loopholes which may make CSAs a crime because of advertiseed wording) while allowing you to take delivery of top quality nutrient rich food products.  There is absolutly no obligation  when you send a request. No I do not have time while marketing our farm products to come knocking at your door. And no, I will never give your address to anyone. If I ever did that we, could never make anyone this type of  offer again. No one would ever believe in  my integrity. Even if you only are curious, send your mail address.
 
 

#703 From: "Laura Villanti" <laurav@...>
Date: Wed Nov 24, 2010 12:51 am
Subject: Food Safety Bill S510
lauravillanti
Send Email Send Email
 
All - we need to keep on the phones and emails... to our senators, to ask them to vote NO on CLOTURE and OPPOSE  the overall bill, S510.
 
It only takes a  few minutes  to make these calls and we need to make them if we want to continue to be able to get foods from our valuable small farmers.
 
With great gratitude for all of the farmers who work so hard to provide the nutrient dense foods to all of us.
 
Have a blessed Thanksgiving!
 
Laura Villanti
Certified Healing Food Specialist - CHFS
Chapter Leader, Rochester NY - Weston A Price Foundation
 
 

VOTE "NO" on CLOTURE & OPPOSE S.510 

 

On Monday, November 29 the Senate will take up for consideration the "manager's package" of S.510, the

FDA Food Safety Modernization Act.


First the Senate will vote on whether to invoke cloture, which takes a three-fifths majority (i.e., 60 votes) to pass.


If the cloture motion passes, the Senate will take up a list of specified amendments (repeal of the 1099 requirements from the health care bill, a moratorium on earmarks, and a substitute bill by Senator Coburn). The Senate will then proceed to a final vote on S.510.

 

We continue to believe that S.510 is NOT in the best interests of small farmers, and especially raw milk farmers. Even though the Tester-Hagan Amendment makes important improvements in the bill, S.510 remains fundamentally flawed.

 

The core problem is that S.510 will significantly increase the power of the FDA. In response to our suit challenging the ban on raw milk in interstate commerce, the FDA stated on public record that the American people have no ''fundamental right to their own bodily and physical health" and "do not have a fundamental right to obtain any food they wish". This agency should not be given any increased power!

TAKE ACTION

 

STEP 1. Call your Senators and tell them to VOTE "NO" on CLOTURE and OPPOSE S.510

Call the Capitol Switchboard at 202-224-3121; ask to be connected to your Senator's office.

    OR

Go to www.Congress.org; enter your zip code on the right side under "Get Involved" and click "Go". Click on your Senators' names then click the "Contact" tab to get office phone number(s).


Clearly state you are calling about S.510, the Food Safety bill; ask your Senator to VOTE "NO" on CLOTURE & OPPOSE S.510 and give your zip code.

If you get voicemail, leave a brief message with your zip code.

 

STEP 2. Send a live message to your Local Newspaper through the online petition to Reject S.510 at www.ftcldf.org/stopS510. 

TALKING POINTS

 

1. FDA does not respect individuals' rights to obtain healthy, quality foods of their choice: 

     "There is no absolute right to consume or feed children any particular food."

     "Plaintiffs' assertion of a 'fundamental right to their own bodily and physical health, which includes what foods they do and do not choose to consume for themselves and their families' is similarly unavailing because plaintiffs do not have a fundamental right to obtain any food they wish."


FDA has even participated in armed raids on small-scale co-ops and membership organizations. This agency should not be given any additional power.


2. FDA has adequate powers under existing law to ensure food safety and effectively deal with foodborne illness outbreaks. FDA has power to inspect, power to detain product and can readily obtain court orders to seize adulterated or misbranded food products or enjoin them from being sold. The problem isn't that FDA needs more power; it's that FDA does not effectively use the power it currently has. The agency has power to inspect imported food yet inspects only 1% of food coming into this country from outside our borders.


3. FDA has used its existing power to benefit the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries at the expense of public health (e.g., allowing the overuse of antibiotics in confined animal feeding operations and refusing to require labeling for genetically-modified foods). This bill does not address the fundamental problems at this agency in order to truly protect public health.

4. S.510 will hurt our ability as a nation to be self-sufficient in food production because it has more lenient inspection requirements for foreign than domestic producers creating an unfair advantage for food imports. Giving an advantage to foreign producers will only increase the amount of food imported into this country that does not meet our domestic standards. S.510 does not address food security--the ability of a country to produce enough food to meet its own needs.


5. S.510 does nothing to address many significant food safety problems in this country, such as those resulting from confined animal feeding operations (CAFOs), genetically modified organisms (GMOs), and various contaminants (e.g., BPA, pesticides, herbicides, etc.). 
 

#704 From: Tim Vail <wapf@...>
Date: Wed Nov 24, 2010 1:15 am
Subject: Re: Food Safety Bill S510
jlypiotv
Send Email Send Email
 
Laura,

I'm a bit confused -- the latest email I saw from WAPF said to tell them to
hold firm on Tester-Hagan amendment.  But I didn't hear them saying to oppose
the bill entirely, even with Tester-Hagan as described in this email.  Where
did this email originate from?

I also thought they already passed cloture last week.

-Tim

On Tuesday November 23 2010, Laura Villanti wrote:
> All - we need to keep on the phones and emails... to our senators, to ask
> them to vote NO on CLOTURE and OPPOSE  the overall bill, S510.
>
> It only takes a  few minutes  to make these calls and we need to make them
> if we want to continue to be able to get foods from our valuable small
> farmers.
>
> With great gratitude for all of the farmers who work so hard to provide the
> nutrient dense foods to all of us.
>
> Have a blessed Thanksgiving!
>
> Laura Villanti
> Certified Healing Food Specialist - CHFS
> Chapter Leader, Rochester NY - Weston A Price Foundation
> http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/rochesterNYwestonaprice/
> www.westonaprice.org <http://www.westonaprice.org/>
>
>
>
>
> VOTE "NO" on CLOTURE & OPPOSE S.510
>
>
>
> On Monday, November 29 the Senate will take up for consideration the
> "manager's package" of S.510, the
>
>
> <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?llr=wm5dahcab&et=1103959920312&s=5304&e=001iadVN
> i
> Shjh2S6IGQQpcHvQ-TvpHK8bNU9UqSZDb1DMPgeVKcH2X9tPIOY88rl64wwmGX8OUv43aKTQv_
> kW
> wkgI2kJTvCAhOIhaEoN3bxHv61pUDYkiyWQHf8Oq2yOTFicn5O2QnF-XHGSw7HAa5rpP2zIjDI
> _V NV> FDA Food Safety Modernization Act.
>
>
>
>
>
> First the Senate will vote on whether to invoke cloture, which takes a
> three-fifths majority (i.e., 60 votes) to pass.
>
>
>
>
>
> If the cloture motion passes, the Senate will take up a list of specified
> amendments (repeal of the 1099 requirements from the health care bill, a
> moratorium on earmarks, and a substitute bill by Senator Coburn). The
> Senate will then proceed to a final vote on S.510.
>
>
>
> We continue to believe that S.510 is NOT in the best interests of small
> farmers, and especially raw milk farmers. Even though the Tester-Hagan
> Amendment makes important improvements in the bill, S.510 remains
> fundamentally flawed.
>
>
>
>
> The core problem is that S.510 will significantly increase the power of the
> FDA. In response to our suit challenging the ban on raw milk in interstate
> commerce, the FDA stated on public record
> <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?llr=wm5dahcab&et=1103959920312&s=5304&e=001iadVN
> i
> Shjh1Xvjxj4LiBkeDbrya_WXSxuMDAsc4flm8iWPUwKRalgXutF9hwdbvIngj-ZtsINeYCs-K-
> yw vstbK40S2Mgy-LzN__7hgxie48n21hWKArCPuIWizqypMdToM78zqpmCHEv3HKN-_tWw==>
> that the American people have no ''fundamental right to their own bodily
> and physical health" and "do not have a fundamental right to obtain any
> food they wish". This agency should not be given any increased power!
>
>
>
> TAKE ACTION
>
>
>
> STEP 1. Call your Senators and tell them to VOTE "NO" on CLOTURE and OPPOSE
> S.510
>
>
>
> Call the Capitol Switchboard at 202-224-3121; ask to be connected to your
> Senator's office.
>
>     OR
>
>
> Go to www.Congress.org; enter your zip code on the right side under "Get
> Involved" and click "Go". Click on your Senators' names then click the
> "Contact" tab to get office phone number(s).
>
>
> Clearly state you are calling about S.510, the Food Safety bill; ask your
> Senator to VOTE "NO" on CLOTURE & OPPOSE S.510 and give your zip code.
>
> If you get voicemail, leave a brief message with your zip code.
>
>
>
>
> STEP 2. Send a live message to your Local Newspaper through the online
> petition to Reject S.510
> <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?llr=wm5dahcab&et=1103959920312&s=5304&e=001iadVN
> i
> Shjh1RpBEHwzVSB1jkynB9-igierTKJZ3aScHzH2jycG-fEK6ZQBxwszvELj44YM2okd2ui4xu
> EY 7RM9sVXu1rYiNVivepdiJV3K-gbgo34V-9Zw==>  at www.ftcldf.org/stopS510.
> <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?llr=wm5dahcab&et=1103959920312&s=5304&e=001iadV
> Ni
> Shjh3M0AJtFGO3Rr_x5kD1jp5HoRBSlScAALT01wjafUQ6qnunqV3uZy0W-RH2ZA0E1R1oLxf1
> R_ vblS3S25jIw7zSgiy9OBxiAzY9YEflvJUZr4eM-QS0CBw7>
>
>
>
> TALKING POINTS
>
>
>
> 1. FDA does not respect individuals' rights to obtain healthy, quality
> foods of their choice:
>
>
>      "There is no absolute right to consume or feed children any particular
> food."
>
>      "Plaintiffs' assertion of a 'fundamental right to their own bodily and
> physical health, which includes what foods they do and do not choose to
> consume for themselves and their families' is similarly unavailing because
> plaintiffs do not have a fundamental right to obtain any food they wish."
>
>
>
>
>
> FDA has even participated in armed raids on small-scale co-ops and
> membership organizations. This agency should not be given any additional
> power.
>
>
>
>
>
> 2. FDA has adequate powers under existing law to ensure food safety and
> effectively deal with foodborne illness outbreaks. FDA has power to
> inspect, power to detain product and can readily obtain court orders to
> seize adulterated or misbranded food products or enjoin them from being
> sold. The problem isn't that FDA needs more power; it's that FDA does not
> effectively use the power it currently has. The agency has power to
> inspect imported food yet inspects only 1% of food coming into this
> country from outside our borders.
>
>
>
>
>
> 3. FDA has used its existing power to benefit the pharmaceutical and
> biotechnology industries at the expense of public health (e.g., allowing
> the overuse of antibiotics in confined animal feeding operations and
> refusing to require labeling for genetically-modified foods). This bill
> does not address the fundamental problems at this agency in order to truly
> protect public health.
>
>
>
> 4. S.510 will hurt our ability as a nation to be self-sufficient in food
> production because it has more lenient inspection requirements for foreign
> than domestic producers creating an unfair advantage for food imports.
> Giving an advantage to foreign producers will only increase the amount of
> food imported into this country that does not meet our domestic standards.
> S.510 does not address food security--the ability of a country to produce
> enough food to meet its own needs.
>
>
>
>
> 5. S.510 does nothing to address many significant food safety problems in
> this country, such as those resulting from confined animal feeding
> operations (CAFOs), genetically modified organisms (GMOs), and various
> contaminants (e.g., BPA, pesticides, herbicides, etc.).

#705 From: Ryan Platte <ryan@...>
Date: Wed Nov 24, 2010 2:17 am
Subject: Re: Food Safety Bill S510
ryanplatte
Send Email Send Email
 
My understanding is that WAPF/FTCLDF was never in support, but was trying to maneuver for the best possible deal should the bill pass. If it's going to pass, we want as many exemptions for small farmers as we can get. Now that we've got exemptions negotiated into the bill for direct-marketing farmers with less than $500K revenue, we want the whole thing defeated so FDA doesn't get even stronger, etc. And at least if it does pass the exemptions will decrease the sting.

My favorite part of all this is that big ag suddenly opposed it as soon as the exemptions for small farms went in.

Can't answer about cloture. I know they had to vote to extend the deadline for something or other, maybe they have to vote again for cloture with the new deadline? 

Ryan Platte
Bootstrap Acres, Rochester NY
http://bootstrapacres.com/
(585) 789-1328



On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 8:15 PM, Tim Vail <wapf@...> wrote:
Laura,

I'm a bit confused -- the latest email I saw from WAPF said to tell them to
hold firm on Tester-Hagan amendment.  But I didn't hear them saying to oppose
the bill entirely, even with Tester-Hagan as described in this email.  Where
did this email originate from?

I also thought they already passed cloture last week.

-Tim

On Tuesday November 23 2010, Laura Villanti wrote:
> All - we need to keep on the phones and emails... to our senators, to ask
> them to vote NO on CLOTURE and OPPOSE  the overall bill, S510.
>
> It only takes a  few minutes  to make these calls and we need to make them
> if we want to continue to be able to get foods from our valuable small
> farmers.
>
> With great gratitude for all of the farmers who work so hard to provide the
> nutrient dense foods to all of us.
>
> Have a blessed Thanksgiving!
>
> Laura Villanti
> Certified Healing Food Specialist - CHFS
> Chapter Leader, Rochester NY - Weston A Price Foundation
> http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/rochesterNYwestonaprice/
> www.westonaprice.org <http://www.westonaprice.org/>
>
>
>
>
> VOTE "NO" on CLOTURE & OPPOSE S.510
>
>
>
> On Monday, November 29 the Senate will take up for consideration the
> "manager's package" of S.510, the
>
>
> <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?llr=wm5dahcab&et=1103959920312&s=5304&e=001iadVN
> i
> Shjh2S6IGQQpcHvQ-TvpHK8bNU9UqSZDb1DMPgeVKcH2X9tPIOY88rl64wwmGX8OUv43aKTQv_
> kW
> wkgI2kJTvCAhOIhaEoN3bxHv61pUDYkiyWQHf8Oq2yOTFicn5O2QnF-XHGSw7HAa5rpP2zIjDI
> _V NV> FDA Food Safety Modernization Act.
>
>
>
>
>
> First the Senate will vote on whether to invoke cloture, which takes a
> three-fifths majority (i.e., 60 votes) to pass.
>
>
>
>
>
> If the cloture motion passes, the Senate will take up a list of specified
> amendments (repeal of the 1099 requirements from the health care bill, a
> moratorium on earmarks, and a substitute bill by Senator Coburn). The
> Senate will then proceed to a final vote on S.510.
>
>
>
> We continue to believe that S.510 is NOT in the best interests of small
> farmers, and especially raw milk farmers. Even though the Tester-Hagan
> Amendment makes important improvements in the bill, S.510 remains
> fundamentally flawed.
>
>
>
>
> The core problem is that S.510 will significantly increase the power of the
> FDA. In response to our suit challenging the ban on raw milk in interstate
> commerce, the FDA stated on public record
> <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?llr=wm5dahcab&et=1103959920312&s=5304&e=001iadVN
> i
> Shjh1Xvjxj4LiBkeDbrya_WXSxuMDAsc4flm8iWPUwKRalgXutF9hwdbvIngj-ZtsINeYCs-K-
> yw vstbK40S2Mgy-LzN__7hgxie48n21hWKArCPuIWizqypMdToM78zqpmCHEv3HKN-_tWw==>
> that the American people have no ''fundamental right to their own bodily
> and physical health" and "do not have a fundamental right to obtain any
> food they wish". This agency should not be given any increased power!
>
>
>
> TAKE ACTION
>
>
>
> STEP 1. Call your Senators and tell them to VOTE "NO" on CLOTURE and OPPOSE
> S.510
>
>
>
> Call the Capitol Switchboard at 202-224-3121; ask to be connected to your
> Senator's office.
>
>     OR
>
>
> Go to www.Congress.org; enter your zip code on the right side under "Get
> Involved" and click "Go". Click on your Senators' names then click the
> "Contact" tab to get office phone number(s).
>
>
> Clearly state you are calling about S.510, the Food Safety bill; ask your
> Senator to VOTE "NO" on CLOTURE & OPPOSE S.510 and give your zip code.
>
> If you get voicemail, leave a brief message with your zip code.
>
>
>
>
> STEP 2. Send a live message to your Local Newspaper through the online
> petition to Reject S.510
> <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?llr=wm5dahcab&et=1103959920312&s=5304&e=001iadVN
> i
> Shjh1RpBEHwzVSB1jkynB9-igierTKJZ3aScHzH2jycG-fEK6ZQBxwszvELj44YM2okd2ui4xu
> EY 7RM9sVXu1rYiNVivepdiJV3K-gbgo34V-9Zw==>  at www.ftcldf.org/stopS510.
> <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?llr=wm5dahcab&et=1103959920312&s=5304&e=001iadV
> Ni
> Shjh3M0AJtFGO3Rr_x5kD1jp5HoRBSlScAALT01wjafUQ6qnunqV3uZy0W-RH2ZA0E1R1oLxf1
> R_ vblS3S25jIw7zSgiy9OBxiAzY9YEflvJUZr4eM-QS0CBw7>
>
>
>
> TALKING POINTS
>
>
>
> 1. FDA does not respect individuals' rights to obtain healthy, quality
> foods of their choice:
>
>
>      "There is no absolute right to consume or feed children any particular
> food."
>
>      "Plaintiffs' assertion of a 'fundamental right to their own bodily and
> physical health, which includes what foods they do and do not choose to
> consume for themselves and their families' is similarly unavailing because
> plaintiffs do not have a fundamental right to obtain any food they wish."
>
>
>
>
>
> FDA has even participated in armed raids on small-scale co-ops and
> membership organizations. This agency should not be given any additional
> power.
>
>
>
>
>
> 2. FDA has adequate powers under existing law to ensure food safety and
> effectively deal with foodborne illness outbreaks. FDA has power to
> inspect, power to detain product and can readily obtain court orders to
> seize adulterated or misbranded food products or enjoin them from being
> sold. The problem isn't that FDA needs more power; it's that FDA does not
> effectively use the power it currently has. The agency has power to
> inspect imported food yet inspects only 1% of food coming into this
> country from outside our borders.
>
>
>
>
>
> 3. FDA has used its existing power to benefit the pharmaceutical and
> biotechnology industries at the expense of public health (e.g., allowing
> the overuse of antibiotics in confined animal feeding operations and
> refusing to require labeling for genetically-modified foods). This bill
> does not address the fundamental problems at this agency in order to truly
> protect public health.
>
>
>
> 4. S.510 will hurt our ability as a nation to be self-sufficient in food
> production because it has more lenient inspection requirements for foreign
> than domestic producers creating an unfair advantage for food imports.
> Giving an advantage to foreign producers will only increase the amount of
> food imported into this country that does not meet our domestic standards.
> S.510 does not address food security--the ability of a country to produce
> enough food to meet its own needs.
>
>
>
>
> 5. S.510 does nothing to address many significant food safety problems in
> this country, such as those resulting from confined animal feeding
> operations (CAFOs), genetically modified organisms (GMOs), and various
> contaminants (e.g., BPA, pesticides, herbicides, etc.).



------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
   http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rochesterNYwestonaprice/

<*> Your email settings:
   Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
   http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rochesterNYwestonaprice/join
   (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
   rochesterNYwestonaprice-digest@yahoogroups.com
   rochesterNYwestonaprice-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
   rochesterNYwestonaprice-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
   http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/



#706 From: "Laura Villanti" <laurav@...>
Date: Wed Nov 24, 2010 12:56 pm
Subject: RE: turnips
lauravillanti
Send Email Send Email
 
Jen, all - yes, I have come to understand and APPRECIATE that we can lacto-ferment any vegetables.  I just saw this post from GNOWFGLINS and this looks beautiful, and I am sure it is tasty.
 
 
At the recent Weston A Price conference, we had a little quarter size dollop of "Organic Cultured Garlic Flowers" on the side of our appetizer at the Saturday evening banquet.  The appetizer was Beef Tataki and Baby Greens...       the fermented garlic flowers were delicious, full of flavor........and what a way of preserving something that is many months past us.  I would have never thought to ferment garlic flowers, but as I said, I have now come to appreciate that we can ferment just about everything (well, perhaps not our socks that we plan to wear tomorrow... :).  
 
Fermented Turnips should easily keep for a year, refrigerated or in a root cellar.   The sooner you ferment them, the better they will be.... as we should always try to use foods in their freshest form & best shape when fermenting.
 
Bon appétit!!
 
:)
Laura Villanti
Certified Healing Food Specialist - CHFS
Chapter Leader, Rochester NY - Weston A Price Foundation
 


From: rochesterNYwestonaprice@yahoogroups.com [mailto:rochesterNYwestonaprice@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Jen Reschke
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2010 8:45 AM
To: discussingnt@yahoogroups.com; rochesterNYwestonaprice@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [rochesterNYwestonaprice] turnips

 

Hi everyone,

I received about 50lbs of turnips from a local farmer friend. Any ideas of what to do with them? Can you lactoferment turnips and do they taste good? How long will they store? Any ideas are much appreciated!
Thanks!
jen

--
Love flowers best in openness and freedom.
~ Edward Abbey


#707 From: "Laura Villanti" <laurav@...>
Date: Wed Nov 24, 2010 1:22 pm
Subject: RE: Food Safety Bill S510
lauravillanti
Send Email Send Email
 
Tim - good question.  When I forwarded this note, I see that the heading did not come through.  This note was from the Farm To Consumer Legal Defense Fund (FTCLDF), an arm of the Weston A Price Foundation, which serves to protect small farmers and very passionately works to help protect raw milk farmers.
 
http://www.farmtoconsumer.org/  - here is the FTCLDF website if you care to learn more about them or join their mailing list.
 
The S510 bill seems like a moving target....... as we have been asked to slightly change our "Requested Action" as the past 10 days have gone by. This is a result of how the bill has been progressing. 
 
Ryan nicely summarized how the Tester Hagan is helpful, and that the foundation is trying to help us get the best possible outcome. 
 
Here is a subset of an Action Alert note that I got from Citizens For Health on 11/22/10.  It explains how the cloture vote has been postponed until Nov 29th.
 

Shortly after our alert the bill's sponsors agreed to a slightly modified version of the Tester-Hagan amendment protecting small farms and distributors from S. 510's overreaching provisions better suited for big agribusiness and the large-scale operations to which recent food safety problems have been attributed. A new effort to invoke cloture on the amended bill failed due to arguments over allowing Senator Tom Coburn (R-OK) to submit an amendment on earmarks, so now consideration of cloture on the amended S. 510 has been postponed until the Senate returns on November 29.

 

Agreement on the Tester-Hagan amendment is good news, but it doesn't go far enough to alleviate all of our concerns with S. 510. Among the problems that have yet to be addressed are what constitutes "reasonable" probability that the use of or exposure to an article of food will cause serious health consequences, and language that could sacrifice the sovereignty of our internal laws and regulations. Read more about our issues with S. 510.

 
Thanks again to everyone for your phone calls on this issue.  Every phone call DOES matter.... and usually takes just 1-2 minutes to make.

With thanks,
 
Laura Villanti
Certified Healing Food Specialist - CHFS
Chapter Leader, Rochester NY - Weston A Price Foundation
 


From: rochesterNYwestonaprice@yahoogroups.com [mailto:rochesterNYwestonaprice@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Ryan Platte
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2010 9:18 PM
To: Tim Vail
Cc: rochesterNYwestonaprice@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [rochesterNYwestonaprice] Food Safety Bill S510

 

My understanding is that WAPF/FTCLDF was never in support, but was trying to maneuver for the best possible deal should the bill pass. If it's going to pass, we want as many exemptions for small farmers as we can get. Now that we've got exemptions negotiated into the bill for direct-marketing farmers with less than $500K revenue, we want the whole thing defeated so FDA doesn't get even stronger, etc. And at least if it does pass the exemptions will decrease the sting.


My favorite part of all this is that big ag suddenly opposed it as soon as the exemptions for small farms went in.

Can't answer about cloture. I know they had to vote to extend the deadline for something or other, maybe they have to vote again for cloture with the new deadline? 

Ryan Platte
Bootstrap Acres, Rochester NY
http://bootstrapacres.com/
(585) 789-1328



On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 8:15 PM, Tim Vail <wapf@...> wrote:
Laura,

I'm a bit confused -- the latest email I saw from WAPF said to tell them to
hold firm on Tester-Hagan amendment.  But I didn't hear them saying to oppose
the bill entirely, even with Tester-Hagan as described in this email.  Where
did this email originate from?

I also thought they already passed cloture last week.

-Tim

On Tuesday November 23 2010, Laura Villanti wrote:
> All - we need to keep on the phones and emails... to our senators, to ask
> them to vote NO on CLOTURE and OPPOSE  the overall bill, S510.
>
> It only takes a  few minutes  to make these calls and we need to make them
> if we want to continue to be able to get foods from our valuable small
> farmers.
>
> With great gratitude for all of the farmers who work so hard to provide the
> nutrient dense foods to all of us.
>
> Have a blessed Thanksgiving!
>
> Laura Villanti
> Certified Healing Food Specialist - CHFS
> Chapter Leader, Rochester NY - Weston A Price Foundation
> http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/rochesterNYwestonaprice/
> www.westonaprice.org <http://www.westonaprice.org/>
>
>
>
>
> VOTE "NO" on CLOTURE & OPPOSE S.510
>
>
>
> On Monday, November 29 the Senate will take up for consideration the
> "manager's package" of S.510, the
>
>
> <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?llr=wm5dahcab&et=1103959920312&s=5304&e=001iadVN
> i
> Shjh2S6IGQQpcHvQ-TvpHK8bNU9UqSZDb1DMPgeVKcH2X9tPIOY88rl64wwmGX8OUv43aKTQv_
> kW
> wkgI2kJTvCAhOIhaEoN3bxHv61pUDYkiyWQHf8Oq2yOTFicn5O2QnF-XHGSw7HAa5rpP2zIjDI
> _V NV> FDA Food Safety Modernization Act.
>
>
>
>
>
> First the Senate will vote on whether to invoke cloture, which takes a
> three-fifths majority (i.e., 60 votes) to pass.
>
>
>
>
>
> If the cloture motion passes, the Senate will take up a list of specified
> amendments (repeal of the 1099 requirements from the health care bill, a
> moratorium on earmarks, and a substitute bill by Senator Coburn). The
> Senate will then proceed to a final vote on S.510.
>
>
>
> We continue to believe that S.510 is NOT in the best interests of small
> farmers, and especially raw milk farmers. Even though the Tester-Hagan
> Amendment makes important improvements in the bill, S.510 remains
> fundamentally flawed.
>
>
>
>
> The core problem is that S.510 will significantly increase the power of the
> FDA. In response to our suit challenging the ban on raw milk in interstate
> commerce, the FDA stated on public record
> <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?llr=wm5dahcab&et=1103959920312&s=5304&e=001iadVN
> i
> Shjh1Xvjxj4LiBkeDbrya_WXSxuMDAsc4flm8iWPUwKRalgXutF9hwdbvIngj-ZtsINeYCs-K-
> yw vstbK40S2Mgy-LzN__7hgxie48n21hWKArCPuIWizqypMdToM78zqpmCHEv3HKN-_tWw==>
> that the American people have no ''fundamental right to their own bodily
> and physical health" and "do not have a fundamental right to obtain any
> food they wish". This agency should not be given any increased power!
>
>
>
> TAKE ACTION
>
>
>
> STEP 1. Call your Senators and tell them to VOTE "NO" on CLOTURE and OPPOSE
> S.510
>
>
>
> Call the Capitol Switchboard at 202-224-3121; ask to be connected to your
> Senator's office.
>
>     OR
>
>
> Go to www.Congress.org; enter your zip code on the right side under "Get
> Involved" and click "Go". Click on your Senators' names then click the
> "Contact" tab to get office phone number(s).
>
>
> Clearly state you are calling about S.510, the Food Safety bill; ask your
> Senator to VOTE "NO" on CLOTURE & OPPOSE S.510 and give your zip code.
>
> If you get voicemail, leave a brief message with your zip code.
>
>
>
>
> STEP 2. Send a live message to your Local Newspaper through the online
> petition to Reject S.510
> <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?llr=wm5dahcab&et=1103959920312&s=5304&e=001iadVN
> i
> Shjh1RpBEHwzVSB1jkynB9-igierTKJZ3aScHzH2jycG-fEK6ZQBxwszvELj44YM2okd2ui4xu
> EY 7RM9sVXu1rYiNVivepdiJV3K-gbgo34V-9Zw==>  at www.ftcldf.org/stopS510.
> <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?llr=wm5dahcab&et=1103959920312&s=5304&e=001iadV
> Ni
> Shjh3M0AJtFGO3Rr_x5kD1jp5HoRBSlScAALT01wjafUQ6qnunqV3uZy0W-RH2ZA0E1R1oLxf1
> R_ vblS3S25jIw7zSgiy9OBxiAzY9YEflvJUZr4eM-QS0CBw7>
>
>
>
> TALKING POINTS
>
>
>
> 1. FDA does not respect individuals' rights to obtain healthy, quality
> foods of their choice:
>
>
>      "There is no absolute right to consume or feed children any particular
> food."
>
>      "Plaintiffs' assertion of a 'fundamental right to their own bodily and
> physical health, which includes what foods they do and do not choose to
> consume for themselves and their families' is similarly unavailing because
> plaintiffs do not have a fundamental right to obtain any food they wish."
>
>
>
>
>
> FDA has even participated in armed raids on small-scale co-ops and
> membership organizations. This agency should not be given any additional
> power.
>
>
>
>
>
> 2. FDA has adequate powers under existing law to ensure food safety and
> effectively deal with foodborne illness outbreaks. FDA has power to
> inspect, power to detain product and can readily obtain court orders to
> seize adulterated or misbranded food products or enjoin them from being
> sold. The problem isn't that FDA needs more power; it's that FDA does not
> effectively use the power it currently has. The agency has power to
> inspect imported food yet inspects only 1% of food coming into this
> country from outside our borders.
>
>
>
>
>
> 3. FDA has used its existing power to benefit the pharmaceutical and
> biotechnology industries at the expense of public health (e.g., allowing
> the overuse of antibiotics in confined animal feeding operations and
> refusing to require labeling for genetically-modified foods). This bill
> does not address the fundamental problems at this agency in order to truly
> protect public health.
>
>
>
> 4. S.510 will hurt our ability as a nation to be self-sufficient in food
> production because it has more lenient inspection requirements for foreign
> than domestic producers creating an unfair advantage for food imports.
> Giving an advantage to foreign producers will only increase the amount of
> food imported into this country that does not meet our domestic standards.
> S.510 does not address food security--the ability of a country to produce
> enough food to meet its own needs.
>
>
>
>
> 5. S.510 does nothing to address many significant food safety problems in
> this country, such as those resulting from confined animal feeding
> operations (CAFOs), genetically modified organisms (GMOs), and various
> contaminants (e.g., BPA, pesticides, herbicides, etc.).



------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
   http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rochesterNYwestonaprice/

<*> Your email settings:
   Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
   http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rochesterNYwestonaprice/join
   (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
   rochesterNYwestonaprice-digest@yahoogroups.com
   rochesterNYwestonaprice-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
   rochesterNYwestonaprice-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
   http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/



#708 From: Phillip Cook <pilgrimsongs@...>
Date: Wed Nov 24, 2010 3:06 pm
Subject: Re: Turnips.
pilgrimsongs
Send Email Send Email
 
     These may be root cellared very well. Do a search on Root cellaring.

#709 From: Happy Hooves Organic Farm <farmserf@...>
Date: Tue Nov 30, 2010 12:42 am
Subject: Fresh Chickens, frozen Turkey whole and parts
farmserf
Send Email Send Email
 
Hi all. We harvested some fresh chickens again today since it was so nice out and they were ready. I think we have about one last harvest to come in about 2 weeks or so, and then no more until next summer. This is much later than I intended to be harvesting chickens, but they are slow growers and that is a bonus when it comes to the flavor.
The chickens we harvested today are heritage chickens, meaning they are not the chickens with the big plump breast and finer bone structure. They are the somewhat less meaty ones with longer thicker bones but BIG flavor. These are some of the ones I considered rather wild as they really ran all over, even staying out in the trees at night. They do have a nice load of golden fat on them, which I personally save for cooking with. They run about 3-1/2 to 4-1/2 pounds and are not tough or stringy but very tasty. I tried some fried and it was delish.
So let me know if anyone wants some ASAP if you want them fresh. I still have some in the freezer as well, mostly smaller ones, but a few large ones in various different breeds including Freedom Rangers and Cornish Cross as well as other heritage breeds. These fresh ones will go in the freezer on Wednesday if not sold by then.
Also available is turkey drumsticks, turkey thigh, turkey wings, boneless turkey breast, and turkey giblet packages ( gizzard, heart and neck for gravy making). Also a couple of frozen whole turkeys, good for Christmas or any day.
All is Certified Organic and Truly Free Range.


Della Jastrzab
@ Happy Hooves Organic Farm
13054 Ira Station Rd
Martville, NY 13111
315-626-6770
All our animals are raised naturally on pasture.
http://www.betterbeef4u.com
Happy Cows Make Better Beef.
Our Cows Smile All The Time.
Certified Organic by NOFA-NY Certified Organic, LLC



#710 From: "Laura Villanti" <laurav@...>
Date: Thu Dec 2, 2010 12:44 pm
Subject: Re: Food Safety Bill S510
lauravillanti
Send Email Send Email
 

All - here are a few updates on the Food Safety Bill...  one is from Citizens for Health.  Both are reporting the same thing.... the food safety bill took a major stumble through the inclusion of some revenue raising (taxes) provisions. Even though the bill passed in the Senate, this has created a major stumbling point.

We should still call our Representatives in the House to share our views.

Laura Villanti

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

House May Block Food Safety Bill Over Senate Error : Roll Call
http://bit.ly/eMdwR2

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 

December 1, 2010

Dear Citizen for Health,

We at Citizens for Health reported earlier that some authorities on the Hill believed the Senate may have shot itself in the foot by authorizing new taxes as part of S. 510 - and we know that the House is the only body empowered to authorize new taxes.

The Alliance for Natural Health (ANH) and NaturalNews are now reporting that this is indeed the case. According to ANH:

"The only possible 'quick fix' would be a unanimous consent agreement in the Senate to strike that revenue-raising provision from the bill—but Sen. Tom Coburn (R-OK) has already stated that he will oppose, so unanimity will be impossible. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid is now faced with some tough choices: spend a huge amount of time all over again to deal with this (which is unlikely in a Lame Duck Congress, especially considering how controversial the bill is); or do nothing, and allow the bill to die at the end of this Congress. This will mean a new Food Safety Bill will be introduced next year—but next year's Congress will be very different from the current one, so we expect that the bill will look very different, and could be much more favorable to the natural health community."

If S. 510 is dead for this session, it would indeed be good news. However, some sources believe there could be enough time to correct the error before the session ends. Naturally, we need to be prepared for any outcome, so it is as important as ever to let your Representatives know you want them to oppose the bill. Citizens for Health and allied organizations have been sending what has been up to 3000 emails per hour - we need to maintain the momentum!

Send an email to your Representative now and tell them to vote "NO"!

We will continue to monitor S. 510's circuitous route through Congress, and keep you updated on any developments.

Thank you for your continuing commitment to this fight,

The Citizens for Health Team


#711 From: "lizzietijuanaiguana" <lizzietijuanaiguana@...>
Date: Tue Dec 7, 2010 10:26 pm
Subject: soy & Mercola
lizzietijuan...
Send Email Send Email
 
Hey, I'm reading on Mercola's site that he's a member. Does WAPF follow his
stuff as he does this group's?

I've been reading to avoid soy right along, and have almost entirely cut it out
of our diet - except for the Ezekiel breads & pastas.

Seeing as they aren't that tasty anyway (unless you dump a load of salt and
butter on them then I think I anything will taste great!) I'm just wondering
what wapf is looking at for information?

Ryan you asked what I am planning, my hopes? I want a better, healthier diet for
me and my boys, and if my husband eventually chooses to go along, that would be
great! for now,he's pretty attached to premade anything in a box with sugar in
it. I told it was silly to eliminate sugar in his coffee. He gets it everywhere
else ;)

I'm hoping to delve into some more of the files and attachments once I get my
[puter looked at. So if there is something there that would answer my questions,
let me know!

Thanks,
Michele

#712 From: Tim Vail <wapf@...>
Date: Wed Dec 8, 2010 4:01 am
Subject: Re: soy & Mercola
jlypiotv
Send Email Send Email
 
Michele,

I've found lot of Mercola's ideas lines up with WAPF's ideas.  It wouldn't
surprise me if Mercola is a member of WAPF.

However, WAPF does *not* follow Mercola, and I don't think Mercola follows
WAPF.  I think the two are independent.  There are areas where the two
disagree.  I don't mean that in a negative way.  I think for me, differences
of opinion is a good, even welcome thing as long as one view doesn't subjugate
the others.  It is never right to force others to follow your ideas.
Especially when they don't agree with or believe in it.

-Tim

On Tuesday December 07 2010, you wrote:
> Hey, I'm reading on Mercola's site that he's a member. Does WAPF follow his
> stuff as he does this group's?

#713 From: "Laura Villanti" <laurav@...>
Date: Wed Dec 8, 2010 1:40 pm
Subject: RE: soy & Mercola
lauravillanti
Send Email Send Email
 
Michele  -
 
As Tim mentioned, Dr. Mercola's work is very much in line with WAPF's work.  In fact, Dr. Mercola has been a Board Member of WAPF for years.  He isn't a board member at the present time.
 
Yes, there are some areas where WAPF and Dr. Mercola differ, but they are few.  I respect both greatly.
 
I'm just wondering what wapf is looking at for information?

WAPF focuses on the information that Dr. Weston A Price acquired in his many year study of native and traditional diets of 14 different civilizations around the world.... 1930's-1940's.    Dr. Price assessed these diets from a nutrient perspective (in his lab back here in the states),  and from the perspective of dental health and overall health.  He also assessed people of the same genetic, native groups and how their health changed when switching away from a traditional foods diet and toward the more processed, commercial foods (flours, sugars, vegetable oils).
 
Congrats on your continued diligence with helping your family eat better.  You have made good progress and I know that you have the spirit to continue to make more positive changes.    I find that many parents are surprised with how far they come with 'improving their family diets' when they take it one little step at a time.  Over the course of a year or two, they look back with a great sense of accomplishment to see how all of those little steps added up.  I too look back and see the progress we make year over year.... it all adds up.  Your children will be the recipient of a better, more healthful life thanks to all of the 'little steps you take'.

Good job.
 
:)
 
Laura Villanti
Certified Healing Food Specialist - CHFS
Chapter Leader, Rochester NY - Weston A Price Foundation
 

From: rochesterNYwestonaprice@yahoogroups.com [mailto:rochesterNYwestonaprice@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Tim Vail
Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2010 11:02 PM
To: rochesterNYwestonaprice@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [rochesterNYwestonaprice] soy & Mercola

 

Michele,

I've found lot of Mercola's ideas lines up with WAPF's ideas. It wouldn't
surprise me if Mercola is a member of WAPF.

However, WAPF does *not* follow Mercola, and I don't think Mercola follows
WAPF. I think the two are independent. There are areas where the two
disagree. I don't mean that in a negative way. I think for me, differences
of opinion is a good, even welcome thing as long as one view doesn't subjugate
the others. It is never right to force others to follow your ideas.
Especially when they don't agree with or believe in it.

-Tim

On Tuesday December 07 2010, you wrote:
> Hey, I'm reading on Mercola's site that he's a member. Does WAPF follow his
> stuff as he does this group's?


#714 From: helene stotz <my_bba@...>
Date: Wed Dec 8, 2010 8:01 pm
Subject: phytic acid--new info?
my_bba
Send Email Send Email
 
I am looking at a website that has info on phytic acid and soaking etc. She says that the acidulated water really doesn't matter for legumes and it really rots on the cooking and the taste even. I have yet to make one batch of beans soaked in acid-water that will cook up soft the way a bean should. I thot they just didn't seem as tasty either...no matter wat kind of seasonings i was cooking them in! So, my experience seems to jive with hers. She always said there's a rumor the next edition of NT won't have soaking in acidulated water for the legumes. Anyone know about this?
She has an interesting article she wrote about how it was important to soak them very warm. Like 140 degrees. here's the link: http://rebuild-from-depression.com/articles/soaking-beans.html either on that page or anothere place, tho, she says she doesnt exactly follow this but keeps it in mind and soaks them extra long time to make up for the inevitable cool temp (ie. less than 140 degrees). Sounds like bringing your beans to a boil and then letting them soak an hour on days you've forgotten to presoak...old advice, yes...pre-phytic acid info (1975?) But maybe this would be a good way to start them out and add the hot water ocassionally as needed as this website suggests.
There is another page about how soaking oatmeal won't do you much good <egad>, because oats have little phytase, BUT if you add 10% FRESH ground wheat flour to your soak water...like 1T for evey cup oats, the soaking will have much good effect. http://www.rebuild-from-depression.com/blog/2010/02/oatmeal_phytic_acid.html#more
I'm wondering if I used half barley, like I always do when I make oatmeal, if that alone would give enough phytase to the water to reduce the oats phytic acid....sometimes I have rye and millet in there too!
Anyway, thot this was interesting stuff...and the site is all about depression and curing it naturally, if you can believe it :)
Hélène
 


#715 From: "farmserf" <farmserf@...>
Date: Thu Dec 9, 2010 1:20 pm
Subject: GMO corn polluting streams
farmserf
Send Email Send Email
 
Had to post this somewhere...wondering how in the world Monsanto missed this with all their diligent studies of the safety of GMO crops...

http://www.non-gmoreport.com/articles/november2010/gmcornpollutingmidweststreams.php

Della Jastrzab
Happy Hooves Organic Farm 

#716 From: "Laura Villanti" <laurav@...>
Date: Thu Dec 9, 2010 5:58 pm
Subject: RE: phytic acid--new info?
lauravillanti
Send Email Send Email
 
I too have made a few batches of beans that came out harder than desired.... and not re-coverable.  They were my earliest batches of homemade beans.  A few things...
 
1) if the beans ever come to a boil, I have heard that that can harden them for which no amount of cooking will ever soften them.  So, a key is to never let them get to a boil in the cooking process.
 
2)  I have been adding kombu to my soaked beans and even cooking it with them.  Also, I have been cooking them in my crock pot.  I have managed to have all of my subsequent batches of homemade beans come out just fine (after my first few that didn't).
 
The article below mentions the addition of baking soda with some bean types and acidic adder with other bean types.  I have done this as well.
 
I don't know about the rumor that NT will change the recommendations on bean soaking.... in it's next addition.  Perhaps...  for now, I just use the info from the article above.
 
Regarding oatmeal, yes...it has little phytates compared to other grains...........and yes, adding a small amount of other grain to it, can make the soaking period even more productive.  By having rye and millet in there, I think you are good to go.
 
Good luck with the beans...don't give up on them.  Once you get your first batch mastered, you will be pleased...  I will post  a recipe from a friend....
 
:)
 
Laura Villanti
Certified Healing Food Specialist - CHFS
Chapter Leader, Rochester NY - Weston A Price Foundation
 


From: rochesterNYwestonaprice@yahoogroups.com [mailto:rochesterNYwestonaprice@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of helene stotz
Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2010 3:02 PM
To: rochesterNYwestonaprice@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [rochesterNYwestonaprice] phytic acid--new info?

 

I am looking at a website that has info on phytic acid and soaking etc. She says that the acidulated water really doesn't matter for legumes and it really rots on the cooking and the taste even. I have yet to make one batch of beans soaked in acid-water that will cook up soft the way a bean should. I thot they just didn't seem as tasty either...no matter wat kind of seasonings i was cooking them in! So, my experience seems to jive with hers. She always said there's a rumor the next edition of NT won't have soaking in acidulated water for the legumes. Anyone know about this?
She has an interesting article she wrote about how it was important to soak them very warm. Like 140 degrees. here's the link: http://rebuild-from-depression.com/articles/soaking-beans.html either on that page or anothere place, tho, she says she doesnt exactly follow this but keeps it in mind and soaks them extra long time to make up for the inevitable cool temp (ie. less than 140 degrees). Sounds like bringing your beans to a boil and then letting them soak an hour on days you've forgotten to presoak...old advice, yes...pre-phytic acid info (1975?) But maybe this would be a good way to start them out and add the hot water ocassionally as needed as this website suggests.
There is another page about how soaking oatmeal won't do you much good <egad>, because oats have little phytase, BUT if you add 10% FRESH ground wheat flour to your soak water...like 1T for evey cup oats, the soaking will have much good effect. http://www.rebuild-from-depression.com/blog/2010/02/oatmeal_phytic_acid.html#more
I'm wondering if I used half barley, like I always do when I make oatmeal, if that alone would give enough phytase to the water to reduce the oats phytic acid....sometimes I have rye and millet in there too!
Anyway, thot this was interesting stuff...and the site is all about depression and curing it naturally, if you can believe it :)
Hélène
 


#717 From: "Laura Villanti" <laurav@...>
Date: Thu Dec 9, 2010 6:00 pm
Subject: baked bean recipe
lauravillanti
Send Email Send Email
 

Tina's Baked Beans - for a large crock pot

6 cups dried Navy Beans, sorted and soaked 12-24 hours, water changed at least twice and well rinsed between changes.
    ( can use whey or lemon juice added to water to aid in soaking)

NOTE from Laura - I have also used a bit of baking soda instead...during the soaking...and they come out great)

After beans have been soaked and well rinsed, put them in crock pot with water to cover by at least 1/2 inch.  

Turn on high, let come to a slight simmer, then turn to low and cook until beans are tender and soft, I usually do this over night or during the day.   Check moisture levels periodically, you may need to add a cup or two of water  every once in a while if they become too dry.  Once beans have softened, add:
One large onion, minced and sautéed with 3 - 4 cloves of minced garlic
1/4- 1/2 cup raw honey - to taste
1-3 tablespoons of apple cider vinegar
1 tsp of dried mustard ( or more, to taste)
optional but  very flavorful - 1 - 2 tsps organic ginger, dried or minced fresh

I've also  used Annie's Organic Horseradish Mustard in place of the  vinegar and dried mustard, it's also very good.

Stir all well, and let simmer on low or keep warm for an additional hour or two if you have the time.   These are good warm or cold, they solidify once they  cool.  


#718 From: "Laura Villanti" <laurav@...>
Date: Thu Dec 9, 2010 9:41 pm
Subject: Citizens for Health Urgent S. 510 Alert - House Passes Back to the Senate
lauravillanti
Send Email Send Email
 
 
 
 
All - this just came in... update on the Food Safety bill.  Sadly, this has been quickly approved and passed back to the Senate under another disguise.... the Continuing Resolution Funding bill.
 
Keep calling .... now our Senators.
Thanks,
Laura Villanti
Chapter Leader, Rochester NY - Weston A Price Foundation
 


From: Citizens for Health [mailto:info@...]
Sent: Thursday, December 09, 2010 4:31 PM
To: laurav@...
Subject: Citizens for Health Urgent S. 510 Alert - House Passes Back to the Senate

December 9, 2010

Dear Citizen for Health,

For those of you who haven't already heard, the House lame-duck leadership amended the “Continuing Resolution” Funding Bill - intended to keep the federal government running for another year - to include the language from S. 510, the FDA Food Safety Modernization Act. Unfortunately the House rushed to action Wednesday and passed it, sending it along to the Senate. Further action could happen as soon as today, Thursday, December 9th.

It is quite unusual to attach such an initiative to a bill authorizing continued government funding and operations.

Urge your Senators NOW to resist any effort to ram through S. 510!

And so, back to the Senate we go. Make no mistake - your efforts are having an impact, and we can't give up now! The House vote was very close: 212 to 205. This is a reflection of how your thousands of messages have helped a significant number of legislators stand firm in the face of pressure from big Agribusiness.

We have to keep holding their feet to the fire and stop this dangerous policy from becoming law. The Senate can still strip S. 510 from the Continuing Resolution before passing it. Congress needs to recognize that:

--Combining a controversial regulatory bill with the Continuing Resolution to fund government operations is inappropriate at best, and at worst, shameful.

--It is even more disturbing that this has been done in spite of thousands and thousands of voters who have made it clear they believe that the federal government is too big and must stop over-regulating.

--S. 510 must be stripped from the Continuing Resolution so that Congress can decide to continue funding at a certain level without muddying the process with extraneous matters.

--We will be monitoring the Senate and expect them to act from principle and not the language from S. 510.

Tell your Senators NOW to strip S. 510 from the Continuing Resolution!

Thanks to all of you who have been participating and helping to hold Congress accountable,

The Citizens for Health Team

And, don’t forget to check out a powerful new resource that can support you personally as well as in your role as an advocate for our world’s health and wellness. WisdomFilms™ is a new genre in contemplative, life-enhancing media. These short, beautiful films provide unique experiences that reduce stress and are deeply inspiring.

To learn more about Voice for HOPE and WisdomFilms™, visit our website.

 

You are receiving emails from Citizens for Health because you subscribed to updates or because you took action in response to an item on our website or in an alert forwarded by a friend. If you wish to receive no further emails from Citizens for Health, click here and enter any email address you wish to have removed - and don't forget to click "unsubscribe"!

empowered by Salsa

Messages 689 - 718 of 1693   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2010 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines NEW - Help