Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
reflexologycommunity · Reflexology Community - A World Reflexology Community
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Want your group to be featured on the Yahoo! Groups website? Add a group photo to Flickr.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Open University's Response to Dr. Sykes programme on reflexology   Topic List   < Prev Topic  |  Next Topic >
Summarize Messages Sort by Date  
#7464 From: footc1
Date: Thu May 15, 2008 3:45 pm
Subject: Open University's Response to Dr. Sykes programme on reflexology
footc1
Offline Offline
 
Dear Mr Kunz,

I'm sorry you are unhappy with our programme.

The series set out to give a very personal view of Kathy Sykes' experiences with
these three
forms of therapy rather than a definitive study of the subjects.

However our experts went to great pains to present a much wider range of links
on the
series website and in our booklet to enable viewers to broaden their knowledge
of and find
diverse viewpoints on each topic - even including some "sceptic sites" in an
attempt to
give balance.

http://www.open2.net/alternativetherapies/isreflexologyvalid.html

http://www.open2.net/alternativetherapies/alternative_weblinks.html

https://css2.open.ac.uk/outis/1alight/(opl24m45qfmjlc55nny2zx45)/o1ayourrqst.asp\
x?
CATCODE=OZJALT


Best wishes,

Polly Frazer
Viewer and Listener Information Officer
The Open University - Open Broadcasting Unit.
OU.viewerandlistenerinfo@...
(: 01908 652777




#7465 From: "kay sainsbury" <kay.sainsbury@...>
Date: Thu May 15, 2008 4:04 pm
Subject: Re: [Reflexology Community ] Open University's Response to Dr. Sykes programme on reflexology
bellygal59
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
Interesting Kevin...

As far as the first link it was no more than a re-hash - if we have found a
positive, it can be explained by a negative. (And again placebo which doesn't
address the effects on children and babies). The second link was to the
reflexology forum, which was so out of date (2006) that it would have put anyone
searching off taking it seriously. The third link was invalid.

Is this really the best their "experts" can do? One question remains, why did
they not approach, or have a comment from, any of the Reflexology organisations
listed. It would be the only fair and balanced way to offset it - though they
are happy to include "the sceptic websites..."

The debate continues
Kay

----- Original Message -----
From: footc1
To: reflexologycommunity@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 4:45 PM
Subject: [Reflexology Community ] Open University's Response to Dr. Sykes
programme on reflexology


Dear Mr Kunz,

I'm sorry you are unhappy with our programme.

The series set out to give a very personal view of Kathy Sykes' experiences
with these three
forms of therapy rather than a definitive study of the subjects.

However our experts went to great pains to present a much wider range of links
on the
series website and in our booklet to enable viewers to broaden their knowledge
of and find
diverse viewpoints on each topic - even including some "sceptic sites" in an
attempt to
give balance.

http://www.open2.net/alternativetherapies/isreflexologyvalid.html

http://www.open2.net/alternativetherapies/alternative_weblinks.html


https://css2.open.ac.uk/outis/1alight/(opl24m45qfmjlc55nny2zx45)/o1ayourrqst.asp\
x?
CATCODE=OZJALT

Best wishes,

Polly Frazer
Viewer and Listener Information Officer
The Open University - Open Broadcasting Unit.
OU.viewerandlistenerinfo@...
(: 01908 652777





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




#7467 From: footc1
Date: Thu May 15, 2008 4:42 pm
Subject: Open University's Response to Dr. Sykes programme on reflexology
footc1
Offline Offline
 
Thought this might be of interest.  Answer back on the question of personal
journey
versus scientific look.

Kevin Kunz

Forum Moderator

*****************************************************************************
The phrase we used of the series is that:

"Professor Kathy Sykes sets off on a personal and scientific journey to
explore three popular, and fast-growing, alternative therapies:
meditation, hypnotherapy, and reflexology." So the answer is both. It
combines her personal opinions and experiences on all sorts of issues
with an examination of relevant scientific research, looked at in a
fair, accurate and objective way.

As for being "definitive", I don't think any of us would ever claim
that and few scientists would ever use that word when looking at
subjects like these for which there has often not been a tremendous
amount of high quality scientific research. On the other hand, do we
think the series presented the current state of scientific knowledge on
the subjects covered fairly and accurately? Of course


Matthew Barrett
Executive Producer
BBC Vision Productions
Tel: (44)-208-008-1388






 
Advanced
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help