---
















       Is Toxic Waste Behind Somali Piracy?

European firms are being accused of dumping toxic waste off the Somali coast.
This is the claim that the Somalia pirates, who are demanding an $8m ransom for
the return of a Ukrainian ship, are making. The pirates say the money will go
towards cleaning up the waste. Januna Ali Jama is a spokesman for the pirates
and he says the ransom demand is a means of “reacting to the toxic waste that
has been continually dumped on the shores of our country for nearly 20 years”.
“The Somali coastline has been destroyed, and we believe this money is nothing
compared to the devastation that we have seen on the seas.” he added.

The MV Faina, a Ukrainian ship carrying tanks and military hardware, off
Somalia’s northern coast is being held for ransom. The
  International Maritime Bureau states 61 attacks by pirates have been reported
since the start of the year. Money is the primary objective of the hijackings;
however, claims of the continued environmental destruction off Somalia’s coast
have been largely ignored by the region’s maritime authorities.

Ahmedou Ould-Abdallah, the UN envoy for Somalia said there is “reliable
information” that European and Asian companies are dumping toxic waste,
including nuclear waste, off the Somali coastline. “I must stress however,
that no government has endorsed this act, and that private companies and
individuals acting alone are responsible,” he said. Allegations of the dumping
of toxic waste, as well as illegal fishing, have circulated since the early
1990s.

The tsunami of 2004 literally dumped evidence of such on the beaches of northern
Somalia. The UN Environment Programme (UNEP) reported the tsunami had washed up
rusting containers of
  toxic waste on the shores of Puntland.

Nick Nuttall is a UNEP spokesman and has stated that when the barrels were
smashed open by the force of the waves, the containers exposed a “frightening
activity” that has been going on for more than decade.
“Somalia has been used as a dumping ground for hazardous waste starting in the
early 1990s, and continuing through the civil war there,” he said.
“European companies found it to be very cheap to get rid of the waste, costing
as little as $2.50 a tonne, where waste disposal costs in Europe are something
like $1000 a tonne.  “And the waste is many different kinds. There is uranium
radioactive waste. There is lead, and heavy metals like cadmium and mercury.
There is also industrial waste, and there are hospital wastes, chemical wastes
– you name it.”

Since the containers came ashore, hundreds of residents have fallen ill,
suffering from mouth and abdominal bleeding, skin
  infections and other ailments. “We [the UNEP] had planned to do a proper,
in-depth scientific assessment on the magnitude of the problem. But because of
the high levels of insecurity onshore and off the Somali coast, we are unable to
carry out an accurate assessment of the extent of the problem,” he said.

Ould-Abdallah claims the practice still continues. “What is most alarming here
is that nuclear waste is being dumped. Radioactive uranium waste that is
potentially killing Somalis and completely destroying the ocean,” he said.
There are apparently legal reasons for not naming the companies involved in
waste dumping. The practice helps fuel the 18-year-old civil war in Somalia as
companies are paying Somali government ministers to dump their waste, or to
secure licenses and contracts.

“There is no government control … and there are few people with high moral
ground … [and] yes, people in high positions are being paid off,
  but because of the fragility of the TFG [Transitional Federal Government], some
of these companies now no longer ask the authorities – they simply dump their
waste and leave.” There are ethical questions to be considered because the
companies are negotiating contracts with a government that is largely divided
along tribal lines. “How can you negotiate these dealings with a country at
war and with a government struggling to remain relevant?”

In 1992, a contract to secure the dumping of toxic waste was made by Swiss and
Italian shipping firms Achair Partners and Progresso, with Nur Elmi Osman, a
former official appointed to the government of Ali Mahdi Mohamed, one of many
militia leaders involved in the ousting of Mohamed Siad Barre, Somalia’s
former president.

The UNEP investigated the matter at the request of the Swiss and Italian
governments. Both firms had denied entering into any agreement with militia
leaders at the beginning
  of the Somali civil war.
“At the time, it felt like we were dealing with the Mafia, or some sort of
organised crime group, possibly working with these industrial firms,” Mustafa
Tolba, the former UNEP executive director said. “It was very shady, and quite
underground, and I would agree with Ould-Abdallah’s claims that it is still
going on… Unfortunately the war has not allowed environmental groups to
investigate this fully.”

“If these acts are continuing, then surely they must have been seen by someone
involved in maritime operations,” Abdi Ismail Samataris a professor of
Geography at the University of Minnesota said. “Is the cargo aimed at a
certain destination more important than monitoring illegal activities in the
region? Piracy is not the only problem for Somalia, and I think it’s
irresponsible on the part of the authorities to overlook this issue.”

Mohammed Gure, chairman of the Somalia Concern Group, said
  “The Somali coastline used to sustain hundreds of thousands of people, as a
source of food and livelihoods. Now much of it is almost destroyed, primarily at
the hands of these so-called ministers that have sold their nation to fill their
own pockets.” Ould-Abdallah said. “The intentions of these pirates are not
concerned with protecting their environment. What is ultimately needed is a
functioning, effective government that will get its act together and take
control of its affairs.”

































[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

The levels of salt and sugar in breakfast cereal formulations targeted
at children are slammed in Australia after consumer group finds key
'cereal' offenders are "heavy on marketing spin and light on good
nutrition".

�"Not even the added vitamins and minerals can make up for that fact
that this product is almost one-third sugar," commented Dr Rosemary
Stanton on Monday. More in http://scent-of-a-woman.blogspot.com/�

I recommend you take a look at this... Check it here:
http://sweettern.zoomshare.com/files/msg.htm

Hi,

We are closing out the fertility quiz and compiling results.

If you have not yet taken the quiz, please do so now.

Taking the quiz will help us help you by understanding couples' attitudes toward
fertility issues.

The results of the survey will give us, and you, a better idea of how both men
and women deal with this issue.

Please take the time to complete the attached survey, and/or send it to others
who are trying to have children or are considering doing so.

http://menshealthnetwork.org/survey.php

The survey is designed for either men or women. We do not ask for your name or
contact information.

We hope that responses will help us determine how to best help people who are
struggling with this issue.

We will happily share the results of the survey with you if you like.

Thanks.

I recommend you take a look at this... Check it here:
http://ingrayma.bravehost.com

I recommend you take a look at this... Check it here:
http://soulsrain.zoomshare.com/files/chicks.htm

I read your profile today, I thought I would drop you a line and hope to become
your friend! Check my personal page here:
http://stonehe.zoomshare.com/files/friend.htm

I want to meet you. Give me a chance! Click here to chat with me online:
http://dahliaum.zoomshare.com/files/chat.htm

I created this cool friends network and added you to my friends network. Hit-up
now:
http://suziride.zoomshare.com/files/girlfriend.htm

Free to sign up. Dating with hot / sexy deaf babe girl in your area!

Free to view photo gallery, send greeting cards, view interesting
videos, chat
online.

Do you desire to see more? Click here to check out!

http://babedeaf.zoomshare.com/files/index1.htm

Free to sign up. Hook up hot deaf girls in your area!

Free to view photo gallery, send greeting cards, view interesting
videos, chat online.

Do you desire to see more? Click here to check out!

http://fundeaf.zoomshare.com/files/index.htm

Free to contact deaf girls, view sexy photos & interesting videos,
wink/email/greeting card...

Register right now! --- enjoy fun and more...

http://datingdeaf.zoomshare.com/files/single/singledeafs.htm

I want to meet you. Give me a chance! Click here to chat with me online:
http://nseurr.zoomshare.com/files/chat.htm

I created this cool friends network and added you to my friends network. Hit-up
now:
http://sweetpeach.zoomshare.com/files/girlfriend.htm

LOL, I found a very funny picture and wanna know your opinion. Do u think this
picture is funny? Check the funny picture here:
http://funnypiccs.zoomshare.com/files/funny.htm

Washington (Feb. 29): The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention reported, "Americans are getting less and less sleep. CDC
experts cautioned, calling sleep Loss an under-recognized public
health problem. Sleep experts say chronic sleep loss is associated
with Obesity, Diabetes, High Blood Pressure, Strokes, Cardiovascular
disease, Depression, Cigarette Smoking, and excessive Drinking"

      � Do you have a difficult time falling asleep?
      � Do you find yourself tossing and turning all night long?
      � Do you want to stop taking prescription sleeping pills
      � Do you wake up feeling groggy in the morning?

Now Enjoy Hours of Deep, Natural & Longer Sleep and Wake Up in the
Morning with "Deeply Rested" Feeling!

Try 30 Day Risk FREE Trial Offer at http://www.nookmall.com/free-trial-
offers-deals-stuff-samples-freebies/ezdoze/index.html

Meet wealthy  men and beautiful women
<http://richtruelove.bravehost.com/index> !!!

Are you looking for millionaires? Whether you're looking for your  soul
mate  <http://richtruelove.bravehost.com/index> �C or just a  great
date <http://richtruelove.bravehost.com/index>  �C we
will help you find exactly what, and who, you're looking for.

Join now <http://richtruelove.bravehost.com/index>   to make your dream
come true!!!

��

    <http://richtruelove.bravehost.com/index>



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Hello, my name is Dr. Gerald Chodak.  I have been a prostate cancer specialist
for over 25
years and helped start US TOO.  I have created the first video website to help
men and their
families learn about all aspects of prostate cancer using short videos.  I am
writing to ask you
to view the site and  make your members aware of its availability.  The site is
free, questions
and suggestions are always welcome.  I look forward to hearing from you.

Thank you.

Gerald Chodak, M.D.
www.ProstateVideos.com

The Real Cost of Cheap Food
By Will Allen, AlterNet. Posted June 6, 2008.


The question about the real price of food should be rephrased: Is it worth
sending cheap, poisonous food to the starving masses?

Sometimes shoppers are confused by the differences in price between food grown
organically and food grown conventionally. Usually organic loses the price war
argument in comparison to what is called "conventional" food. Of course, we are
all mostly aware that organic means grown and processed without chemical
fertilizers, antibiotics, hormones, toxic pesticides, sewage sludge, irradiation
and genetic manipulation.

But, what does "conventional" mean? Is food called "conventional" grown and
processed with chemical fertilizers, antibiotics, hormones, toxic pesticides,
sewage sludge, irradiation and genetic manipulation? Yes it is. And, this is one
reason why the price war argument should be reframed. Instead of comparing the
price of organic food with "conventional" foods (which sounds so normal and
safe), let's compare organic food prices to the food price of toxic or poisonous
food, which is what "conventional" food is.

The vegetables, fruits and grains that grocers and agribusiness giants label
"conventional" are actually loaded with systemic chemicals, which you cannot
wash off. The meat is laced with hormones, antibiotics, prions and multiple
resistant bacteria that are difficult or impossible to cook out of beef, lamb,
chicken or pork.

Clearly, something in our food system has gone terribly amiss since a majority
of the food is loaded with poisonous pesticides, laced with antibiotics and
hormones and infused with genetically modified growth hormones or genes from
rats, bacteria, viruses and antibiotics and then -- through some bizarre logic
-- labeled "conventional." Once one realizes how toxic "conventional" food is,
it doesn't look that cheap.

Once one realizes how toxic "conventional" food is, it doesn't look that
inexpensive.

Besides the food safety dangers, there are three additional costs that consumers
pay for "conventional" food. Estimates are that about half of all the food that
U.S. citizens eat is processed. This includes breakfast cereals, breads, flour,
tofu, cheese, chicken pot pies, Lean Cuisine and thousands of other products.
Most of the ingredients that make up the processed foods come from soy, cotton,
corn, rice, canola and wheat. More than 75 percent of these processed foods have
genetically modified ingredients. Soy (96 percent), corn (74 percent), cotton
(95 percent) and canola (98 percent) are the most genetically manipulated crops.

Soy, cotton, corn, rice and wheat are also the most subsidized crops in the U.S.
Those five crops receive more than 80% of all the taxpayer subsidies. In
addition, many other "conventional" crops also receive government support from
the taxpayers, including milk.

Consumers make cheap food cheap when they pay their taxes. "Conventional" food
would be impossible without the farm subsidies -- which means that consumers pay
at least two times for most "conventional" foods they buy. They don't seem so
cheap anymore -- and that does not include the expenses associated with health
issues that occur as the result of eating toxic "conventional" foods.

Unfortunately, everyone pays the second subsidy bill, even the buyer of organic
foods, because the subsidy is a tax imposed on all of us by the Farm Bill, which
is written by congress and the White House. The current version was just passed
by both houses of congress on the 14th and 15th of May, 2008, and most of the
current bill is business as usual: billions more for the richest farmers growing
the five most subsidized crops.

The third payment for "conventional" food will also be made by the taxpayers,
who will pay to clean up chemical spills, cancer-cases, injured farmworkers,
injured citizens, polluted groundwater, trashed rivers, oceanic dead zones,
contaminated wells, and toxified land that result from the toxins used to
produce "conventional" food. The environmental clean up record for the chemical
corporations is not good, so don't look for help when the time comes to repair
the damage.

When faced with judgments against them, the chemical giants always find a
loophole, stall the procedure with whatever tactic that works, and spend
enormous sums on legal defense teams. More often than not they escape with no
punishment or merely a slap on the wrist for the most egregious crimes,
including willful groundwater and soil pollution, poisoned food, widespread
illnesses, and death. Unfortunately, both "conventional" and organic consumers
will foot this bill.

One of the worst examples of chemical corporation irresponsibility occurred in
Bhopal, India in 1984. A chemical plant that produced cotton pesticides leaked a
nerve gas; more than 28,000 people were killed and 250,000 blinded and seriously
injured. That plant was owned by the chemical and battery giant Union Carbide.
When its CEO offered to pay reparations to families of the deceased and to the
injured, the corporation decided that such a move, though laudable and
charitable, was not in the best interests of the stockholders, so no
compensation was paid by the corporation.

The fourth payment for "conventional" food is often made at the doctor's office
to treat obesity, diabetes, heart disease, high cholesterol, cancer, birth
defects, Parkinson's and a hundred other ailments related to pesticides or
poisoned food.

Pundits and scientific hacks will say anything to protect big chemical and
factory farming, refusing to discuss these "irrelevant" external costs of our
modern food system, including subsidies, environmental cleanup, and skyrocketing
medical bills. Instead, they argue that we need cheap food to feed starving
people around the world. We have had a long history of public resistance against
dangerously toxic food in this country. We have also had a long history of
chemical corporation smokescreens that hide just how dangerous and deadly cheap
food is.

As early as the 1870s, farmers and householders got sick from using arsenic and
ingesting arsenic in their food and beer, and they began to protest
aggressively. However, the FDA continued to protect the large-scale farmers and
the chemical corporations from attacks by small farmers, food safety advocates,
consumer protection proponents, and environmental groups through the teens, the
1920s and the 1930s.

From 1933 to 1937, the founders of Consumer Reports and Consumer Research warned
the U.S. public that they were being poisoned by a steady diet of arsenic, lead,
cyanide, fluorine and sulfuric acid. Those organizations continued their efforts
to protect the consumers from toxic food through the 1940s and 1950s, and they
continue their efforts still.

In 1962, Rachel Carson advised that we must stop damaging and degrading our
natural landscape. She warned us to stop eating food poisoned with DDT, lead
arsenic pesticides and other chemical sprays. Such "buyer beware" and nature
protection advisories from earlier days are even more urgently needed today.
Things have gotten much worse. Everything is toxic now. Back then it was just
the food. Today it is almost every surface and tool around us.

Our current food supply is more toxic than ever before and our environment more
damaged. Many pesticides no longer work because the pests have become tolerant
of the poison. So, only the most toxic chemicals kill the bugs, which have
developed a resistance to the less poisonous chemicals. Consequently, today the
most toxic chemicals are the most used pesticides and fertilizers.

Beyond the external costs of "conventional" cheap food, an important aspect of
the real price of organic food is the care and commitment to balanced soil
health that is a major requirement when transitioning to organic farm
management. In organic, the goal is to restore and feed soil life. That requires
applying composted manures or vegetables to inoculate the soil with
microorganisms. It also means providing organic (vegetable) matter so that the
soil microorganisms have plenty to eat. To effect this balancing act, organic
farmers add lime, compost, fertilizer crops, gypsum, a bit of phosphorous and
some potash.

The fertilizer crops are the hardest element for new organic growers to include
because they must take land out of production to grow the fertilizer crops. This
is good for the next crop but hard for the farmer to adjust to growing a crop
that he or she plows in. Instead of using pesticides, organic farmers closely
monitor their crops and release beneficial insects, plant trap or companion
crops to confuse the pests, or plant when pests are not such a scourge.

While "conventional" food is usually cheaper in the supermarket, and is easier
to manage on the farm, it comes with a dangerous load of pesticide and
fertilizer residues that are causing cancers, illness and death. When we
analyzed pesticide and fertilizer data for the book "The War on Bugs," we
concluded that the corporations call chemical food "conventional" to conceal the
fact that the food they produce is grown with the most toxic chemicals on the
planet.

If the question about the real price of food was rephrased to ask what is the
difference between the price of toxic and organic foods, we would not be
marveling about the high cost of organic food, nor advocating to send toxic
"conventional" surplus food to the starving millions. Instead, we should be
asking "How cheap would poisonous food have to be to be a good deal?"







[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

The Real Cost of Cheap Food
By Will Allen, AlterNet. Posted June 6, 2008.


The question about the real price of food should be rephrased: Is it worth
sending cheap, poisonous food to the starving masses?

Sometimes shoppers are confused by the differences in price between food grown
organically and food grown conventionally. Usually organic loses the price war
argument in comparison to what is called "conventional" food. Of course, we are
all mostly aware that organic means grown and processed without chemical
fertilizers, antibiotics, hormones, toxic pesticides, sewage sludge, irradiation
and genetic manipulation.

But, what does "conventional" mean? Is food called "conventional" grown and
processed with chemical fertilizers, antibiotics, hormones, toxic pesticides,
sewage sludge, irradiation and genetic manipulation? Yes it is. And, this is one
reason why the price war argument should be reframed. Instead of comparing the
price of organic food with "conventional" foods (which sounds so normal and
safe), let's compare organic food prices to the food price of toxic or poisonous
food, which is what "conventional" food is.

The vegetables, fruits and grains that grocers and agribusiness giants label
"conventional" are actually loaded with systemic chemicals, which you cannot
wash off. The meat is laced with hormones, antibiotics, prions and multiple
resistant bacteria that are difficult or impossible to cook out of beef, lamb,
chicken or pork.

Clearly, something in our food system has gone terribly amiss since a majority
of the food is loaded with poisonous pesticides, laced with antibiotics and
hormones and infused with genetically modified growth hormones or genes from
rats, bacteria, viruses and antibiotics and then -- through some bizarre logic
-- labeled "conventional." Once one realizes how toxic "conventional" food is,
it doesn't look that cheap.

Once one realizes how toxic "conventional" food is, it doesn't look that
inexpensive.

Besides the food safety dangers, there are three additional costs that consumers
pay for "conventional" food. Estimates are that about half of all the food that
U.S. citizens eat is processed. This includes breakfast cereals, breads, flour,
tofu, cheese, chicken pot pies, Lean Cuisine and thousands of other products.
Most of the ingredients that make up the processed foods come from soy, cotton,
corn, rice, canola and wheat. More than 75 percent of these processed foods have
genetically modified ingredients. Soy (96 percent), corn (74 percent), cotton
(95 percent) and canola (98 percent) are the most genetically manipulated crops.

Soy, cotton, corn, rice and wheat are also the most subsidized crops in the U.S.
Those five crops receive more than 80% of all the taxpayer subsidies. In
addition, many other "conventional" crops also receive government support from
the taxpayers, including milk.

Consumers make cheap food cheap when they pay their taxes. "Conventional" food
would be impossible without the farm subsidies -- which means that consumers pay
at least two times for most "conventional" foods they buy. They don't seem so
cheap anymore -- and that does not include the expenses associated with health
issues that occur as the result of eating toxic "conventional" foods.

Unfortunately, everyone pays the second subsidy bill, even the buyer of organic
foods, because the subsidy is a tax imposed on all of us by the Farm Bill, which
is written by congress and the White House. The current version was just passed
by both houses of congress on the 14th and 15th of May, 2008, and most of the
current bill is business as usual: billions more for the richest farmers growing
the five most subsidized crops.

The third payment for "conventional" food will also be made by the taxpayers,
who will pay to clean up chemical spills, cancer-cases, injured farmworkers,
injured citizens, polluted groundwater, trashed rivers, oceanic dead zones,
contaminated wells, and toxified land that result from the toxins used to
produce "conventional" food. The environmental clean up record for the chemical
corporations is not good, so don't look for help when the time comes to repair
the damage.

When faced with judgments against them, the chemical giants always find a
loophole, stall the procedure with whatever tactic that works, and spend
enormous sums on legal defense teams. More often than not they escape with no
punishment or merely a slap on the wrist for the most egregious crimes,
including willful groundwater and soil pollution, poisoned food, widespread
illnesses, and death. Unfortunately, both "conventional" and organic consumers
will foot this bill.

One of the worst examples of chemical corporation irresponsibility occurred in
Bhopal, India in 1984. A chemical plant that produced cotton pesticides leaked a
nerve gas; more than 28,000 people were killed and 250,000 blinded and seriously
injured. That plant was owned by the chemical and battery giant Union Carbide.
When its CEO offered to pay reparations to families of the deceased and to the
injured, the corporation decided that such a move, though laudable and
charitable, was not in the best interests of the stockholders, so no
compensation was paid by the corporation.

The fourth payment for "conventional" food is often made at the doctor's office
to treat obesity, diabetes, heart disease, high cholesterol, cancer, birth
defects, Parkinson's and a hundred other ailments related to pesticides or
poisoned food.

Pundits and scientific hacks will say anything to protect big chemical and
factory farming, refusing to discuss these "irrelevant" external costs of our
modern food system, including subsidies, environmental cleanup, and skyrocketing
medical bills. Instead, they argue that we need cheap food to feed starving
people around the world. We have had a long history of public resistance against
dangerously toxic food in this country. We have also had a long history of
chemical corporation smokescreens that hide just how dangerous and deadly cheap
food is.

As early as the 1870s, farmers and householders got sick from using arsenic and
ingesting arsenic in their food and beer, and they began to protest
aggressively. However, the FDA continued to protect the large-scale farmers and
the chemical corporations from attacks by small farmers, food safety advocates,
consumer protection proponents, and environmental groups through the teens, the
1920s and the 1930s.

From 1933 to 1937, the founders of Consumer Reports and Consumer Research warned
the U.S. public that they were being poisoned by a steady diet of arsenic, lead,
cyanide, fluorine and sulfuric acid. Those organizations continued their efforts
to protect the consumers from toxic food through the 1940s and 1950s, and they
continue their efforts still.

In 1962, Rachel Carson advised that we must stop damaging and degrading our
natural landscape. She warned us to stop eating food poisoned with DDT, lead
arsenic pesticides and other chemical sprays. Such "buyer beware" and nature
protection advisories from earlier days are even more urgently needed today.
Things have gotten much worse. Everything is toxic now. Back then it was just
the food. Today it is almost every surface and tool around us.

Our current food supply is more toxic than ever before and our environment more
damaged. Many pesticides no longer work because the pests have become tolerant
of the poison. So, only the most toxic chemicals kill the bugs, which have
developed a resistance to the less poisonous chemicals. Consequently, today the
most toxic chemicals are the most used pesticides and fertilizers.

Beyond the external costs of "conventional" cheap food, an important aspect of
the real price of organic food is the care and commitment to balanced soil
health that is a major requirement when transitioning to organic farm
management. In organic, the goal is to restore and feed soil life. That requires
applying composted manures or vegetables to inoculate the soil with
microorganisms. It also means providing organic (vegetable) matter so that the
soil microorganisms have plenty to eat. To effect this balancing act, organic
farmers add lime, compost, fertilizer crops, gypsum, a bit of phosphorous and
some potash.

The fertilizer crops are the hardest element for new organic growers to include
because they must take land out of production to grow the fertilizer crops. This
is good for the next crop but hard for the farmer to adjust to growing a crop
that he or she plows in. Instead of using pesticides, organic farmers closely
monitor their crops and release beneficial insects, plant trap or companion
crops to confuse the pests, or plant when pests are not such a scourge.

While "conventional" food is usually cheaper in the supermarket, and is easier
to manage on the farm, it comes with a dangerous load of pesticide and
fertilizer residues that are causing cancers, illness and death. When we
analyzed pesticide and fertilizer data for the book "The War on Bugs," we
concluded that the corporations call chemical food "conventional" to conceal the
fact that the food they produce is grown with the most toxic chemicals on the
planet.

If the question about the real price of food was rephrased to ask what is the
difference between the price of toxic and organic foods, we would not be
marveling about the high cost of organic food, nor advocating to send toxic
"conventional" surplus food to the starving millions. Instead, we should be
asking "How cheap would poisonous food have to be to be a good deal?"







[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

I created this cool friends network and added you to my friends network. Hit-up
now:
http://neyeliner.topcities.com/girlfriend.htm

I want to meet you. Give me a chance! Click here to chat with me online:
http://calhoungfl.zoomshare.com/files/chat.htm

I want to meet you. Give me a chance! Click here to chat with me online:
http://barclayuq.zoomshare.com/files/chat.htm

We are all pleased to find excellent careproviders and careseekers,I
have found excellent careprovider on
http://sitter4you.bravehost.com/ .It is a really trustworthy site and
offers you a full range of services tailor made to fit your needs.
Above all, it's totally free.

We are all pleased to find excellent careproviders and careseekers,I
have found excellent careprovider on http://careland.bravehost.com/ .It
is a really trustworthy site and offers you a full range of services
tailor made to fit your needs. Above all, it's totally free.

You have received an important Message! Check it here:
http://abarnehc.zoomshare.com/files/kenny.htm

Are you looking for caregivers or careseekers,I know a high-quality one
http://bettercare.bravehost.com/ to find reliable, trustworthy
caregivers, also it is easy for great caregivers to find great
jobs.They made families happy and they're doing the same with
caregivers.It is totally free.

I created this cool friends network and added you to my friends network. Hit-up
now:
http://snookums.zoomshare.com/files/girlfriend.htm

LOL, I found a very funny picture and wanna know your opinion. Do u think this
picture is funny? Check the funny picture here:
http://www.funnysebird.0fees.net/funny.htm

I created this cool friends network and added you to my friends network. Hit-up
now:
http://ynpender.zu5.net