Hi charlena,
 
I hope you get your computer fixed.  Thanks for welcoming me. 
 
Bea


Ostomates_R_US
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Ostomates_R_Us/?v=1&t=search&ch=web&pub=groups&sec\
=group&slk=1
AFWSB
Gift_Box
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Gift_Box/?v=1&t=search&ch=web&pub=groups&sec=group\
&slk=8
 
 
 

--- On Sat, 11/1/08, lilcharlene <no_reply@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

From: lilcharlene <no_reply@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: [peoples with ostomy2] Re: new here
To: peopleswithostomy2@yahoogroups.com
Date: Saturday, November 1, 2008, 3:59 PM






Hi Bea:

Welcome. Look forward to talking to you more. I have join this
group
since 2001. Before my ostomy I was battleing with crohns disease.
Now
I am doing good. Excuse me, there is a little glitch with my
computer,
it is not typing correctly, don't know what is wrong with it yet.
Hopefully, I can fix. I need to get back to you shortly. Please
don't
be offended by the short note.

Charlene

How can Barack Obama claim he will cut taxes for 95 percent of
Americans?

More than one-third of all Americans don't pay any income taxes.
Thus,
the real truth is Obama's plan is a lot of subsidies and government
payments to people, which he redefines as "tax cuts."

This is a scheme to take money from people who have worked hard for
it
and give it to people who have not. What is morally right about
confiscating personal income from hard working people and redirecting
it to others? And who are these elitists who decide what to do with
the hard earned income of every American who holds a job that pays
tax?

One more thought: Exactly how do you fix the economy by making the
poor rich and the rich poor? His balance sheet does not add up.


************ ********* *****


What is the the difference between Barrack Obama's plan to spread the
wealth around and Karl Marx's plan to spread the wealth around? Marx
called his plan communism, Obama hasn't named his yet, but it is also
communist.


************ ********* ***

A freshman senator obviously does not have the experience of a
senator
who won re-elections time after time.

A vote against Sarah Palin is plain prejudice against woman. She is
very smart and will surly be groomed by Senator John MCain to become
a
competent vice president. They both support bipartisanship and
that's
what our country need. Candidates who sound like the pot calling the
kettle black do not prove anything. Our best judgments demands good
government. McCain has the respect of friends in both parties. We
need the bipartisanship. Prejudice wll not benefit our nation. Vote
for McCain - Palin


It is wrong to claim that Sarah Palin is inexperience for the job of
vice president. If your compare resumes then Barack Obama is far
more
inexperience compared to Palin. When Obama launch his political
career
in the living room of Professor Bill Ayers, Palin has already been an
elected official. She served on the Wasilla City Council from 1992
to
1996, and became mayor of the same city from 1996 to 2002. From 2002
to 2004, Palin was head of the Alaska Oil and Gas Commission. She
became the Governor of Alaska the same year Barack Obama became a
U.S.
Senator. As senator, Obama has not been able to get one bill that he
wrote passed into law, but after 143 days of his arrival in the
Senate,
he anounced his bid for President of the United States of America.
As
governor, Palin oversea 15,000 state government employees and a
budget
of $2.9 billion. The only thing Obama has overseen is his senate
office of 63 staff. Now who is the "inexperience" one?

--- In peopleswithostomy2@ yahoogroups. com, "Bea Chamberlain"
<bea.chamberlain@ ...> wrote:
>
> Hi everyone!
>
> I am new here and would like to say hi and introduce myself. My
name
> is Bea. I am 47 and have had my urostomy since I was 11. I also
have
> spina bifida. I have been having some problems eith getting the
> appliance to stay on since I moved from Delaware to Texas. I hope
to
> get to know all of you and make new friends.
>
> Bea
>


















[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]