Excerpt:

 

"Each of the three cases "addressed a rather new but rather widely supported cultural development and gave it constitutional legitimacy," Professor Paul Gewirtz of Yale Law School said. To some extent the court was leading the country, and to some extent it was playing catch-up, but the most significant aspect of the term, Professor Gewirtz said in an interview, was the court's role in "consolidating cultural developments," legitimizing them and translating them into "binding legal principle."

 

Good news for possible re-thinking down the line by U.S. regarding the Disability Convention?

 

:) A good  Tuesday to all, :) LindaMF.