Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
paediatrics · Children Health disease -GSMC KEMPEDS
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Want your group to be featured on the Yahoo! Groups website? Add a group photo to Flickr.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
http://icmr.nic.in/000134/stat.htm   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #396 of 1276 |

http://icmr.nic.in/000134/stat.htm




www.drkondekar.s5.com

I am sorry, I dont receive emails on this address.

This account is used by many people for various purposes.



Marriage? Join BharatMatrimony.com.

Wed Feb 25, 2004 9:31 am

dialdrpeds
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email

HEALTH STATISTICS AT A GLANCE


CLICK THESE SITES TO SEE INDIAN DEMOGRAPHIC HEALTH STATISTICS


  1. POPULATION FOUNDATION OF INDIA
  2. INDIA AT A GLANCE

Goals for Health and family Welfare Programmes


-----------------------------------------------------------------------
sl. Goals
No. Indicator Current level 1985 1990 2000
_______________________________________________________________________
1 2 3 4 5 6 -----------------------------------------------------------------------

1. Infant mortality rate Rural 136 (1978) 122
Urban 70 (1978) 60
Total 125 (1978) 106 87 below 60
Perinatal mortality 67 (1976) 30-35
2. Crude death rate Around 14 12 10.4 9.0
3. Pre-school child
(1-5yrs.) mortality 24(1976-77) 20-24 15-20 10
4. Maternal mortality rate 4-5(1976) 3-4 2-3 below 2
5. Life expectancy
of birth (yrs.) male 52.6 (1976-81) 55.1 57.6 64
6. Babies with birth weight
below 2500 gms.(percentage) 30 25 18 10
7. Crude birth rate Around 35 31 27 21
8. Effective couple protection
(percentage) 23.6(March,82) 37.0 42 60
9. Net Reproduction Rate(NRR) 1.48(1981) 1.13 1.17 1.0
10. Growth rate (annual) 2.24(1971-81) 1.90 1.66 1.2
11. Family size 4.4(1975) 3.8 2.3
12. pregnant mothers receiving
ante-natal care(%) 40-50 50-60 60-75 100
13. Deliveries by trained birth
attendants(%) 30-35 50 80 100
14. Immunisations status (% coverage)
TT (for Pregnant women) 20 60 100 100
TT (for school children)
10years 40 100 100
16years 20 40 100 100
DPT(children below 3 years) 25 70 85 85
Polio (infants) 5 50 70 85
BCG (infants) 65 70 80 85
DT(new school entrants(5-6yr)20 80 85 85
Typhoid (new school entrants
5-6years) 2 70 85 85
15. Leprosy---percentage of disease arrested cases out
of those detected 20 40 60 80
16. TB---percentage of disease
arrested cases out of those
detected 50 60 75 90
17. Blindness-Incidence (%) 1.4 1 0.7 0.3

PROGRESS ACHIEVED

During the last three decades and more, since the attainment of Independence, considerable progress has been achieved in the promotion of the health status of our people. Smallpox has been eliminated; plague is no longer a problem; mortality from cholera and related diseases has decreased and malaria brought under control to a considerable extent. The mortality rate per thousand of population has been reduced from 27.4 to 14.8 and the life expectancy at birth has increased from 32.7 to over 52. A fairly extensive network of dispensaries, hospitals and institutions providing specialised curative care has developed and a large stock of medical and health personnel, of various levels, has become available. Significant indigenous capacity has been established for the production of drugs and pharmaceuticals, vaccines, sera, hospital equipments, etc.

The existing picture

In spite of such impressive progress, the demographic and health picture of the country still constitutes a cause for serious and urgent concern. The high rate of population growth continues to have an adverse effect on the health of our people and the quality of their lives. The mortality rates for women and children are still dis- tressingly high; almost one third of the total deaths occur among children below the age of 5 years; infant mortality is around 129 per thousand live births. Efforts at raising the nutritional levels of our people have still to bear fruit and the extent and severity of malnutrition continues to be exceptionally high. Communicable and non- communicable diseases have still to be brought under effective control and eradicated. Blindness, Leprosy and T.B. continue to have a high incidence. Only 31% of the rural population has access to potable water supply and 0.5% enjoys basic sanitation.

High incidence of diarrhoeal diseases and other preventive and infectious diseases, specially amongst infants and children, lack of safe drinking water and poor environmental sanitation, poverty and ignorance are among the major contributory causes of the high incidence of disease and mortality.

The existing situation has been largely engendered by the almost wholesale adoption of health manpower development policies and the establishment of curative centres based on the Western models, which are inappropriate and irrelevant to the real needs of our people and the socio-economic conditions obtaining in the country. The hospital-based disease, and cure-oriented approach towards the establishment of medical services has provided benefits to the upper crusts, of society, specially those residing in the urban areas. The proliferation of this approach has been at the cost of providing comprehensive primary health care services to the entire population, whether residing in the urban or the rural areas. Furthermore, the continued high emphasis on the curative approach has led to the neglect of the preventive, promotive, public health and rehabilitative aspects of health care. The existing approach, instead of improving awareness and building up self-reliance, has tended to enhance dependency and weaken the community's capacity to cope with its problems. The prevailing policies in regard to the education and training of medical and health personnel, at various levels, has resulted in the development of a cultural gap between the people and the personnel providing care. The various health programmes have, by and large, failed to involve individuals and families in establishing a self-reliant community. Also, over the years, the planning process has become largely oblivious of the fact that the ultimate goal of achieving a satisfactory health status for all our people cannot be secured without involving the community in the identification of their health needs and priorities as well as in the implementation and management of the various health and related programmes.

Need for evolving a health policy--- the revised 20-Point Programme

India is committed to attaining the goal of "Health for All by the Year 2000 A.D." through the universal provision of comprehensive primary health care services. The attainment of this goal requires a thorough overhaul of the existing approaches to the education and training of medical and health personnel and the reorganisation of the health services infrastructure. Furthermore, considering the large variety of inputs into health, it is necessary to secure the complete integration of all plans for health and human development with the overall national socio-economic development process, specially in the more closely health related sectors, e.g. drugs and pharmaceu- ticals, agriculture and food production, rural development, education and social welfare, housing, water supply and sanitation, prevention of food adulteration, main- tenance of prescribed standards in the manufacture and sale of drugs and the conservation of the environment. In sum, the contours of the National Health Policy have to be evolved within a fully integrated planning framework which seeks to provide universal, comprehensive primary health care services, relevant to the actual needs and priorities of the community at a cost which the people can afford, ensuring that the planning and implementation of the various health programmes is through the organised involvement and participation of the community, adequately utilising the services being rendered by private voluntary organisations active in the Health sector.

It is also necessary to ensure that the pattern of development of the health services infrastructure in the future fully takes into account the revised 20-Point Programme. The said Programme attributes very high priority to the promotion of family planning as a people's programme, on a voluntary basis; substantial augmenta- tion and provision of primary health care facilities on a universal basis; control of Leprosy, T.B. and Blindness; acceleration of welfare programmes for women and children; nutrition programmes for pregnant women, nursing mothers and children, especially in the tribal, hill and backward areas. The Programme also places high emphasis on the supply of drinking water to all problem villages, improvements in the housing and environments of the weaker sections of society; increased production of essential food items; integrated rural developments; spread of universal elementary education; expansion of the public distribution system, etc.

Population stabilisation

Irrespective of the changes, no matter how fundamental, that may be brought about in the over-all approach to health care and the restructuring of the health services, not much headway is likely to be achieved in improving the health status of the people unless success is achieved in securing the small family norm, through voluntary efforts, and moving towards the goal of population stabilisation. In view of the vital importance of securing the balanced growth of the population, it is neces- sary to enunciate, separately, a National Population Policy.

Source: MOH&FW WEB Site

clock

Estimated Population of India at this Time(Oct. 2000) is 1,012,000,000


Rate of Increase During July 2000 to June 2001

  • Per Year = 15,402,000
  • Per Month = 1,283,500
  • Per Day = 42,197
  • Per Hour = 1,758
  • Per Minute = 29




HOME TOP BACK NEXT




0x01 graphic
e-CENSUSIndia

Issue No.13: 2002
31 AUGUST 2002
PAGE 1

Vital Rates By Natural Divisions


List of Data Products-India





NEWSLETTER
in PDF






































Published by:
Office of the Registrar General, India
2A, Mansingh Road,
New Delhi 110011
India
Email
rgoffice@...
Go to page 2
       Contents:
 
Features article on Vital rates by Natural Divisions in India
 
Updated article on Vital rates by Natural Divisions in India
 

Understanding the Vital Rates
- Births, Deaths and Infant Mortality Rate -
at Natural Division Level

            As a result of the concerted efforts undertaken by the government and some other agencies it has been possible to substantially lower the vital rates in India. Various health programmes including Maternal Health Care (MCH) programme, universal immunization, safe motherhood and the family planning programme have directly contributed toward this visible decline in the last two decades. Table 1 summarizes the decline of the vital rates in India over 1971 to 2000.
 

Table 1
Vital rates for India - 1971 - 2000

Year Crude Birth Rate Crude Death Rate Infant Mortality Rate
     
1971 36.9 14.9 129
1976 34.4 15.0 129
1981 33.9 12.5 110
1986 32.6 11.1 96
1991* 29.5 98 80
1996 27.5 9.0 72
2000 25.8 8.5 68

Source : Sample Registration System, Office of the Registrar General, India
*-Excludes Jammu & Kashmir

 
          
            At the state level, however, the trend in decline of vital rates shows a mixed pattern. Whereas some states have shown remarkable improvements in the pursuit of lowering the birth rate, death rate and infant mortality rate mainly due to the seriousness with which the programmes mentioned above were implemented over the years, some other states could achieve only limited progress. The Hindi speaking heartland of the country, comprising of Rajasthan, Himachal Pradesh, Haryana, Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh and Bihar, where about 44% of the population of the country live, significant decline in the vital rates is still far away with the sole exception of Himachal Pradesh. Table 2 would illustrate this further:
 

Table 2
Crude birth rate, Crude death rate and Infant mortality rate by states, 1997-99

BIRTH
RATE

INDIA (26.4), Kerala (18.0), Tamil Nadu (19.1), West Bengal (21.5), Andhra Pradesh (22.2), Maharashtra (22.2), Karnataka (22.3), Punjab (22.4), Himachal Pradesh (23.0), Orissa (25.4), Gujarat (25.5), Haryana (27.6), Assam (27.7), Madhya Pradesh (31.2), Bihar (31.5), Rajasthan (31.6), Uttar Pradesh (32.9)

DEATH RATE

INDIA (8.8), Kerala (6.4), West Bengal (7.4), Punjab (7.5), Maharashtra (7.5), Himachal Pradesh (7.7), Karnataka (7.7), Gujarat (7.8), Haryana (8.0), Tamil Nadu (8.2), Andhra Pradesh (8.5), Rajasthan (8.7), Bihar (9.4), Assam (9.9), Uttar Pradesh (10.4), Orissa (10.9), Madhya Pradesh (10.9)

INFANT MORTALITY RATE

INDIA (70.5), Kerala (14.1), Maharashtra (48.0), Tamil Nadu (52.6), Punjab (52.8), West Bengal (53.6), Karnataka (61.4), Himachal Pradesh (61.4), Gujarat (63.2), Andhra Pradesh (65.2), Bihar (67.0), Haryana (68.6), Assam (76.0), Rajasthan (83.1), Uttar Pradesh (85.1), Madhya Pradesh (94.0), Orissa (96.9)


            As the Hindi Belt also includes one of the most densely populated area of the country, the Gangetic Plains, the slow decline in vital rates is adversely affecting the overall efforts in improving the living condition of the population in this area. It is important to consider the disaggregated vital rates at the sub-state level in districts or regions. One of the reasons for not publishing vital rates at district level is the insufficient sample size on which the rates are estimated based on Sample Registration System (SRS) survey. Lower the sample size, higher the error, which is likely to creep in while estimating the vital rates. Though census releases indirect estimation of vital rates at district level on the basis of the decennial census data, the decade long gap in the availability of data at district level restricts its effective use in formulating intervention strategy and evaluation at regular short intervals, which otherwise is available every year through SRS.

            In this article an attempt has been made to analyse the data at the natural division level, which comprises of a number of administrative districts. The estimation of vital rates at natural division level has less sampling errors than at district level. Furthermore many scholars are now holding the view that due mainly to greater homogeneity and uniformity in the cultural ethos and socio-economic and demographic conditions of the people living in the natural divisions than in the form of administrative districts, it is possible to delineate the areas of disparity by natural divisions. The picture emerging seems to represent a more realistic pattern of the differences or similarities existing for a particular characteristic. The natural division used here for the analysis conforms to the natural divisions used by the NSSO.
Continued in page 2


Forward
Message #396 of 1276 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

http://icmr.nic.in/000134/stat.htm www.drkondekar.s5.com I am sorry, I dont receive emails on this address. This account is used by many people for various...
drdoctor doc
dialdrpeds
Offline Send Email
Feb 25, 2004
9:49 am
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help