I feel compelled to write about my experience with doing direct IV just to calm
any fears some of you may have. I have only done it 5 times now, and have
probably made many mistakes, but the one I'm going to talk about here is this.
On my third application I accidentally forgot to turn on the regulator, I have
since put up a procedure list to check off. So I filled the syringe with 10cc's
of ambient air. I pushed it in and thought something was funny as the vein got
very large. As I was turning everything off I saw what I had done and got a bit
fearful from hearing all the talk of embolisms. I waited an hour or so and
nothing, absolutely nothing happened. So I investigated a few pathologists
sites and found out that to cause an embolism one must inject at least 200 cc's
of air. Which of course there aren't even syringes that large. I would never
do that again, but if it were to happen I wouldn't have the fear I did that day.
I hope this helps anyone having trepidations about this useful form of using
ozone in certain situations.
And even in administering large dosages of air the emboli can be overcome by
laying on a specific side. As the heart pumps eventually the air breaks up and
dissipates ....I just don't remember which side you are suppose to lay on.
Anyone? This is what they do in the hospital if it should occur... in many many
years of nursing work I have never seen it.
In oxyzone@yahoogroups.com, "edyrayfield@..." <edyrayfield@...> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I feel compelled to write about my experience with doing direct IV just to
calm any fears some of you may have. I have only done it 5 times now, and have
probably made many mistakes, but the one I'm going to talk about here is this.
On my third application I accidentally forgot to turn on the regulator, I have
since put up a procedure list to check off. So I filled the syringe with 10cc's
of ambient air. I pushed it in and thought something was funny as the vein got
very large. As I was turning everything off I saw what I had done and got a bit
fearful from hearing all the talk of embolisms. I waited an hour or so and
nothing, absolutely nothing happened. So I investigated a few pathologists
sites and found out that to cause an embolism one must inject at least 200 cc's
of air. Which of course there aren't even syringes that large. I would never
do that again, but if it were to happen I wouldn't have the fear I did that day.
I hope this helps anyone having trepidations about this useful form of using
ozone in certain situations.
>
> Edy
>
This is not true. You could have caused a stroke or a heart attack from an air embolism with as little as 5cc's or possibly less. you played, in my opinion, "Medical Russian Roulette". Direct Iv and Autohemotherapy should ONLY be done by well trained medical professionals.One death will hurt the ozone world in North America, in my opinion, in a very serious way permanently.
--- On Mon, 5/18/09, edyrayfield@... <edyrayfield@...> wrote:
From: edyrayfield@... <edyrayfield@...> Subject: [oxyzone] direct IV To: oxyzone@yahoogroups.com Date: Monday, May 18, 2009, 2:42 PM
Hello,
I feel compelled to write about my experience with doing direct IV just to calm any fears some of you may have. I have only done it 5 times now, and have probably made many mistakes, but the one I'm going to talk about here is this. On my third application I accidentally forgot to turn on the regulator, I have since put up a procedure list to check off. So I filled the syringe with 10cc's of ambient air. I pushed it in and thought something was funny as the vein got very large. As I was turning everything off I saw what I had done and got a bit fearful from hearing all the talk of embolisms. I waited an hour or so and nothing, absolutely nothing happened. So I investigated a few pathologists sites and found out that to cause an embolism one must inject at least 200 cc's of air. Which of course there aren't even syringes that large. I would never do that again, but if it were to happen I wouldn't have the fear I did that day. I hope this helps
anyone having trepidations
about this useful form of using ozone in certain situations.
Once again, IT IS EXTREMELY DANGEROUS TO GET TO GET "AIR" IN YOUR BLOOD. THE NITROGEN CAN AGGLUTINATE (FORM A BIG BUBBLE) AND KILL YOU. IT CAN KILL YOU. ONLY AN INSANE PERSON WOULD TAKE THIS RISK. I DON'T CARE HOW MANY TIMES YOU SURVIVE THIS MISTAKE, IT'S WRONG TO DO IT AND IT'S WRONG TO ADVISE ANYONE THAT "IT'S O.K.".
It's talk like this that makes me feel that maybe, just maybe, Dr Bocci is correct about Direct Iv. ONly trained medical professionals should ever do it.
PLEASE BE CAREFUL, AS SMOKEY THE BEAR ONCE SAID "THE LIFE YOU SAVE MAY BE YOUR OWN".
DR HOWARD ROBINS
--- On Tue, 5/19/09, Arrow <arrowwind09@...> wrote:
From: Arrow
<arrowwind09@...> Subject: [oxyzone] Re: direct IV To: oxyzone@yahoogroups.com Date: Tuesday, May 19, 2009, 1:45 AM
And even in administering large dosages of air the emboli can be overcome by laying on a specific side. As the heart pumps eventually the air breaks up and dissipates ....I just don't remember which side you are suppose to lay on. Anyone? This is what they do in the hospital if it should occur... in many many years of nursing work I have never seen it.
In oxyzone@yahoogroups .com, "edyrayfield@ ..." <edyrayfield@ ...> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I feel compelled to write about my experience with doing direct IV just to calm any fears some of you may have. I have only done it 5 times now, and have probably made many mistakes, but the one I'm going to talk about here is this. On my third application I accidentally forgot to turn on the regulator, I have since put up a procedure list to check off. So I filled the syringe with 10cc's of ambient air. I pushed it in and thought something was funny as the vein got very large. As I was turning everything off I saw what I had done and got a bit fearful from hearing all the talk of embolisms. I waited an hour or so and nothing, absolutely nothing happened. So I investigated a few pathologists sites and found out that to cause an embolism one must inject at least 200 cc's of air. Which of course there aren't even syringes that large. I would never do that again, but if it were to happen I wouldn't have the fear I did that day. I hope this helps
anyone having trepidations
about this useful form of using ozone in certain situations.
>
> Edy
>
It really is nice to have a real doctor in the group. So many people on these
forum play doctor, and will even imply doctor, when they are not at all.
Thanks for you input.
People will often get desperate when very ill.
Gail
-- In oxyzone@yahoogroups.com, DOCTOR HOWARD ROBINS <howardrobins@...> wrote:
>
> Once again, IT IS EXTREMELY DANGEROUS TO GET TO GET "AIR" IN YOUR BLOOD. THE
NITROGEN CAN AGGLUTINATE (FORM A BIG BUBBLE) AND KILL YOU. IT CAN KILL YOU. ONLY
AN INSANE PERSON WOULD TAKE THIS RISK. I DON'T CARE HOW MANY TIMES YOU SURVIVE
THIS MISTAKE, IT'S WRONG TO DO IT AND IT'S WRONG TO ADVISE ANYONE THAT "IT'S
O.K.".
> It's talk like this that makes me feel that maybe, just maybe, Dr Bocci is
correct about Direct Iv. ONly trained medical professionals should ever do it.
> PLEASE BE CAREFUL, AS SMOKEY THE BEAR ONCE SAID "THE LIFE YOU SAVE MAY BE YOUR
OWN".
> DR HOWARD ROBINS
>
> --- On Tue, 5/19/09, Arrow <arrowwind09@...> wrote:
>
> From: Arrow <arrowwind09@...>
> Subject: [oxyzone] Re: direct IV
> To: oxyzone@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Tuesday, May 19, 2009, 1:45 AM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> And even in administering large dosages of air the emboli can be
overcome by laying on a specific side. As the heart pumps eventually the air
breaks up and dissipates ....I just don't remember which side you are suppose to
lay on. Anyone? This is what they do in the hospital if it should occur... in
many many years of nursing work I have never seen it.
>
>
>
> In oxyzone@yahoogroups .com, "edyrayfield@ ..." <edyrayfield@ ...> wrote:
>
> >
>
> > Hello,
>
> >
>
> > I feel compelled to write about my experience with doing direct IV just to
calm any fears some of you may have. I have only done it 5 times now, and have
probably made many mistakes, but the one I'm going to talk about here is this.
On my third application I accidentally forgot to turn on the regulator, I have
since put up a procedure list to check off. So I filled the syringe with 10cc's
of ambient air. I pushed it in and thought something was funny as the vein got
very large. As I was turning everything off I saw what I had done and got a bit
fearful from hearing all the talk of embolisms. I waited an hour or so and
nothing, absolutely nothing happened. So I investigated a few pathologists
sites and found out that to cause an embolism one must inject at least 200 cc's
of air. Which of course there aren't even syringes that large. I would never
do that again, but if it were to happen I wouldn't have the fear I did that day.
I hope this helps
> anyone having trepidations
> about this useful form of using ozone in certain situations.
>
> >
>
> > Edy
>
> >
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: oxyzone@yahoogroups.com
> [mailto:oxyzone@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of wanda85929
> Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2009 12:09 PM
> To: oxyzone@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [oxyzone] Re: direct IV
>
> Dr. Howard,
>
> It really is nice to have a real doctor in the group. So
> many people on these forum play doctor, and will even imply
> doctor, when they are not at all.
>
> Thanks for you input.
>
> People will often get desperate when very ill.
>
> Gail
--- In oxyzone@yahoogroups.com, "bob Larson" <bobList@...> wrote:
>
> ...he's a podiatrist. DPM.
>
>
Well, don't they go to medical school and have to pass the boards? Gail
It is my opinion that Edy was sharing a story
and not saying that it is ok to inject air. Merely pointing out what happened
so that those of you that believe ozone IV can create an emboli are misguided
due to the lack of nitrogen. Please as always read as much as you can to be
educated. What I want to say is that there are many references, which I have
included some and it is up to all of you what you believe or interpret from
what is stated. As in all cases do not do what others tell you, research and only
do what you are comfortable with and accept responsibility for it.
For the record, in my time with many thousands
of those treated in our clinics and hospitals, I have never come across one
person that suffered from an embolism, although we have always used pure oxygen
and medical ozone units.
I'm a vet, and I can say that some of the ideas people have
suggested would only work with a very big needle or if you were very lucky.
We sometimes inject euthenasia solution into the heart to
euthenase animals (under unusual circumstances). The actual needle going in
does not cause death, only the chemical, which is an overdose of anaesthetic.
So you could cause death by injecting something through the needle into the
heart, if it was a hypodermic, but not with the needle itself, unless you had
dipped it in a toxin of some kind beforehand. Also, it can be quite hard to hit
the heart even if you have been trained to do so, so your torturer might not
manage.
An air embolus in a vein is not always fatal, it depends
where it ends up. Medics (human and veterinary) try to avoid running air
bubbles through drips, but it does sometimes happen, and usually it doesn't
cause a problem.
You could not easily kill someone by sticking a needle into
an artery. For one thing, arteries have thick rubbery walls and are not that
easy to pierce: they tend to slip off the needle. For another, blood clots
fast, and you would need a big hole for blood to flow out faster than the clot
blocked it for long enough for the person to bleed out and die. More likely,
you'd just end up with a big painful bruise. The same is true of puncturing a
vein.
I think the best method would be via the brain, as someone
else said. This is basically what they do when they pith frogs for physiology
experiments (or used to). You could try sticking the needle up through the hard
palate, in through the nose or back of the eye socket, or perhaps through an
ear, but in all cases you would need a big, strong needle and a hammer. A
skewer might work better. I don't think many of these would be instant. Also
bear in mind that the brain itself does not feel pain because it has no pain
receptors, so while the damage on the way through the skull would be
excruciating, the brain bit wouldn't hurt.
Or, if you wanted to do it very slowly, you could stick the
needle through their abdomen and into their guts a few times (not all that easy
either: guts tend to slip out of the way). Then intestinal bacteria would leak
into the abdomen and they'd get peritonitis, become very ill, and die: but it
would take days and days, and not be guaranteed.
Yuck.
Murder by air
embolism is quite rare, despite the strong chances of a murderer escaping scot
free in such cases. This is because such a technique requires great skill. Not
everyone can handle a syringe, let alone puncture a vein successfully with it.
I have a nagging fear that such type of murder might be very common among the
drug addicts of our country. They are quite suited for committing such types of
murder. They can handle syringes very deftly (almost as deftly as doctors, as
they have to inject the drugs through the syringe all the time), and they need
to do away with people fairly commonly.
In my whole life, I
have encountered just one case of murder by air embolism and that too when I
was in Edinburgh. The case was of a doctor husband who had got tired of his
nagging wife. The husband was carrying on an affair with one of his female
patients and his wife had got hint of that. She was having fits of faintness
for quite sometime. So one day the doctor filled up a large syringe with air
and injected air into her veins under the pretext that he was giving her some
drug. About 200 c.c. of air is required to kill a person by air embolism. I do
not know how he managed to inject that much amount through a syringe. Even a
commonly used large syringe takes in about 20 c.c. of air only. He might have
used a bigger syringe or may be he repeatedly pushed the air inside by removing
the piston from the syringe again and again. Well, the important thing is that
he did use the air for committing the murder. He would have gone scot free, but
when I asked one of the witnesses as to what were the symptoms of the lady when
she was dying, I was told that she was gasping for air. This immediately
alerted me. This is a symptom of air embolism as we have already seen. Coupled
with this was the fact that her husband was a doctor. He was ideally suited for
committing such a type of act. So before opening the body, I decided to take a
radiograph (X-ray) of the body. Sure enough the bubbles of air could be seen in
the deceased woman's pulmonary arteries. Then I looked at the dead woman's
forearms. They showed marks of injection. Immediately I alerted the Lothian and
Borders Police (the police force that mans the city of Edinburgh). A detailed
interrogation was done and sure enough the doctor admitted his guilt. This was
yet another victory of Forensic Medicine.
So we're left to wonder once again, can a shot of air really
kill someone?
The Real Story: Possibly, but only a real
tool would test it out.
Bubbles of air in the circulating blood can cause death or brain damage, if the
air bubble cuts off the blood supply to your brain.
However, according to Dr. Barry Wolcott MD, FACP, senior
vice president of clinical affairs for WebMD
Health, "In general, the small amount of air that can be introduced by a
typical syringe is not large enough to cause a fatal air embolism (an air
embolism is similar to a blood clot)."
Dr. Wolcott explained, "the large amounts of air that
can quickly enter through a large plastic catheter which is open to the air
— like those placed in the neck or under the collarbone during
resuscitations in hospitals and at accident scenes — can be fatal,
especially if the patient inhales forcefully while the catheter is open to the
air."
"The only way to discover the limits
of the possible is to venture a little way past them into the impossible."
Arthur C. Clarke
WITHOUT PREJUDICE
Without prejudice to the generality of the contents herein, this communication
does not attach any legal liability on the originator thereof. This
communication contains information, which is private in nature, confidential
and may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the intended
recipient(s). If you have received this communication by error, or have
received it by means of interception, please delete the email and destroy any
copies of it.The message herein the subject of this mailing is designed to provide
information in regard to the subject matter covered. It is provided with the
understanding that the sender of this information is not engaged in rendering
legal, medical, accounting or other professional services. If legal, medical
advice or other professional assistance is required, the services of a
competent professional person should be sought.
From:
oxyzone@yahoogroups.com [mailto:oxyzone@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of DOCTOR HOWARD ROBINS Sent: May-19-09 6:43 AM To: oxyzone@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [oxyzone] Re: direct
IV
Once
again, IT IS EXTREMELY DANGEROUS TO GET TO GET "AIR" IN YOUR BLOOD.
THE NITROGEN CAN AGGLUTINATE (FORM A BIG BUBBLE) AND KILL YOU. IT CAN KILL
YOU. ONLY AN INSANE PERSON WOULD TAKE THIS RISK. I DON'T CARE HOW MANY TIMES
YOU SURVIVE THIS MISTAKE, IT'S WRONG TO DO IT AND IT'S WRONG TO ADVISE ANYONE
THAT "IT'S O.K.".
It's talk
like this that makes me feel that maybe, just maybe, Dr Bocci is correct
about Direct Iv. ONly trained medical professionals should ever do it.
PLEASE BE
CAREFUL, AS SMOKEY THE BEAR ONCE SAID "THE LIFE YOU SAVE MAY BE YOUR
OWN".
DR HOWARD
ROBINS
--- On Tue, 5/19/09, Arrow <arrowwind09@...>
wrote:
From: Arrow <arrowwind09@...>
Subject: [oxyzone] Re: direct IV
To: oxyzone@yahoogroups.com
Date: Tuesday, May 19, 2009, 1:45 AM
And even in administering large dosages of air the
emboli can be overcome by laying on a specific side. As the heart pumps
eventually the air breaks up and dissipates ....I just don't remember which
side you are suppose to lay on. Anyone? This is what they do in the hospital
if it should occur... in many many years of nursing work I have never seen
it.
In oxyzone@yahoogroups
.com, "edyrayfield@ ..." <edyrayfield@ ...> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I feel compelled to write about my experience with doing direct IV just
to calm any fears some of you may have. I have only done it 5 times now, and
have probably made many mistakes, but the one I'm going to talk about here is
this. On my third application I accidentally forgot to turn on the regulator,
I have since put up a procedure list to check off. So I filled the syringe
with 10cc's of ambient air. I pushed it in and thought something was funny as
the vein got very large. As I was turning everything off I saw what I had
done and got a bit fearful from hearing all the talk of embolisms. I waited
an hour or so and nothing, absolutely nothing happened. So I investigated a
few pathologists sites and found out that to cause an embolism one must
inject at least 200 cc's of air. Which of course there aren't even syringes
that large. I would never do that again, but if it were to happen I wouldn't
have the fear I did that day. I hope this helps anyone having trepidations
about this useful form of using ozone in certain situations.
>
> Edy
>
No
virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.329 / Virus Database: 270.12.33/2120 - Release Date: 05/19/09
06:21:00
Thank You, Peter for your sane reply to this fear mongering.
Technique is everything when doing IV work. My biggest concern with injection of
ozone
would be if someone were using a pic or central line. I am wondering if you
think it is OK to use these kind of lines for direct IV ozone application. One
thought I had, since these lines are suppose to stay in place for up to 3
months, would the ozone erode the catheter that is in the vein? Sometimes these
catheters are quite long, going from the antecubital insert site, or there
abouts, almost all the way to the heart. This would worry me. Have you had
experience using ozone with these lines?
thanks,
Arrow
-- In oxyzone@yahoogroups.com, Peter Professor Ozone Jovanovic <peter@...>
wrote:
>
> Dear all:
>
> Time for me to say something about this...
>
> It is my opinion that Edy was sharing a story and not saying that it is ok
> to inject air. Merely pointing out what happened so that those of you that
> believe ozone IV can create an emboli are misguided due to the lack of
> nitrogen. Please as always read as much as you can to be educated. What I
> want to say is that there are many references, which I have included some
> and it is up to all of you what you believe or interpret from what is
> stated. As in all cases do not do what others tell you, research and only do
> what you are comfortable with and accept responsibility for it.
>
> For the record, in my time with many thousands of those treated in our
> clinics and hospitals, I have never come across one person that suffered
> from an embolism, although we have always used pure oxygen and medical ozone
> units.
>
>
> http://www.merck.com/mmhe/sec04/ch046/ch046a.html
>
> http://www.vascularweb.org/patients/NorthPoint/Pulmonary_Embolism.html
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air_embolism
>
> http://www.impactednurse.com/?p=303
>
> http://www.politedissent.com/archives/1873
>
> http://www.secondopinionnewsletter.com/pages.aspx/28/Hydrogen%20Peroxide%20D
> oesn%27t%20Kill%20Patients,%20Drugs%20Do!/
>
> http://www.nhs.uk/conditions/embolism/Pages/Introduction.aspx
> I'm a vet, and I can say that some of the ideas people have suggested would
> only work with a very big needle or if you were very lucky.
> We sometimes inject euthenasia solution into the heart to euthenase animals
> (under unusual circumstances). The actual needle going in does not cause
> death, only the chemical, which is an overdose of anaesthetic. So you could
> cause death by injecting something through the needle into the heart, if it
> was a hypodermic, but not with the needle itself, unless you had dipped it
> in a toxin of some kind beforehand. Also, it can be quite hard to hit the
> heart even if you have been trained to do so, so your torturer might not
> manage.
> An air embolus in a vein is not always fatal, it depends where it ends up.
> Medics (human and veterinary) try to avoid running air bubbles through
> drips, but it does sometimes happen, and usually it doesn't cause a problem.
> You could not easily kill someone by sticking a needle into an artery. For
> one thing, arteries have thick rubbery walls and are not that easy to
> pierce: they tend to slip off the needle. For another, blood clots fast, and
> you would need a big hole for blood to flow out faster than the clot blocked
> it for long enough for the person to bleed out and die. More likely, you'd
> just end up with a big painful bruise. The same is true of puncturing a
> vein.
> I think the best method would be via the brain, as someone else said. This
> is basically what they do when they pith frogs for physiology experiments
> (or used to). You could try sticking the needle up through the hard palate,
> in through the nose or back of the eye socket, or perhaps through an ear,
> but in all cases you would need a big, strong needle and a hammer. A skewer
> might work better. I don't think many of these would be instant. Also bear
> in mind that the brain itself does not feel pain because it has no pain
> receptors, so while the damage on the way through the skull would be
> excruciating, the brain bit wouldn't hurt.
> Or, if you wanted to do it very slowly, you could stick the needle through
> their abdomen and into their guts a few times (not all that easy either:
> guts tend to slip out of the way). Then intestinal bacteria would leak into
> the abdomen and they'd get peritonitis, become very ill, and die: but it
> would take days and days, and not be guaranteed.
> Yuck.
> Murder by air embolism is quite rare, despite the strong chances of a
> murderer escaping scot free in such cases. This is because such a technique
> requires great skill. Not everyone can handle a syringe, let alone puncture
> a vein successfully with it. I have a nagging fear that such type of murder
> might be very common among the drug addicts of our country. They are quite
> suited for committing such types of murder. They can handle syringes very
> deftly (almost as deftly as doctors, as they have to inject the drugs
> through the syringe all the time), and they need to do away with people
> fairly commonly.
> In my whole life, I have encountered just one case of murder by air embolism
> and that too when I was in Edinburgh. The case was of a doctor husband who
> had got tired of his nagging wife. The husband was carrying on an affair
> with one of his female patients and his wife had got hint of that. She was
> having fits of faintness for quite sometime. So one day the doctor filled up
> a large syringe with air and injected air into her veins under the pretext
> that he was giving her some drug. About 200 c.c. of air is required to kill
> a person by air embolism. I do not know how he managed to inject that much
> amount through a syringe. Even a commonly used large syringe takes in about
> 20 c.c. of air only. He might have used a bigger syringe or may be he
> repeatedly pushed the air inside by removing the piston from the syringe
> again and again. Well, the important thing is that he did use the air for
> committing the murder. He would have gone scot free, but when I asked one of
> the witnesses as to what were the symptoms of the lady when she was dying, I
> was told that she was gasping for air. This immediately alerted me. This is
> a symptom of air embolism as we have already seen. Coupled with this was the
> fact that her husband was a doctor. He was ideally suited for committing
> such a type of act. So before opening the body, I decided to take a
> radiograph (X-ray) of the body. Sure enough the bubbles of air could be seen
> in the deceased woman's pulmonary arteries. Then I looked at the dead
> woman's forearms. They showed marks of injection. Immediately I alerted the
> Lothian and Borders Police (the police force that mans the city of
> Edinburgh). A detailed interrogation was done and sure enough the doctor
> admitted his guilt. This was yet another victory of Forensic Medicine.
>
> So we're left to wonder once again, can a shot of air really kill someone?
> The Real Story: Possibly, but only a real tool would test it out.
> Bubbles of air in the circulating blood can cause death or brain damage, if
> the air bubble cuts off the blood supply to your brain.
> However, according to Dr. Barry Wolcott MD, FACP, senior vice president of
> clinical affairs for WebMD <http://www.webmd.com> Health, "In general, the
> small amount of air that can be introduced by a typical syringe is not large
> enough to cause a fatal air embolism (an air embolism is similar to a blood
> clot)."
> Dr. Wolcott explained, "the large amounts of air that can quickly enter
> through a large plastic catheter which is open to the air - like those
> placed in the neck or under the collarbone during resuscitations in
> hospitals and at accident scenes - can be fatal, especially if the patient
> inhales forcefully while the catheter is open to the air."
>
>
> May God Bless You And Keep You Well
>
> Peter (Professor Ozone) Jovanovic
> <http://www.ozoneuniversity.com/> www.ozoneuniversity.com
> <http://www.ozonehospital.com/> www.ozonehospital.com
> <http://www.oxygentherapyexperts.com/> www.oxygentherapyexperts.com
> <http://www.medicalozone.info/> www.medicalozone.info
> <http://www.bloodozonation.com/> www.bloodozonation.com
> <http://www.youtube.com/user/ozoneresearch>
> http://www.youtube.com/user/ozoneresearch
> Phone - +1-604-501-6051
> Fax - +1-440-550-5610
> Ozone Research Group
> Founder
> Skype ID - ozoneresearch
> Yahoo ID - humansafe2001
> Yahoo Group Owner - <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/oxyzone>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/oxyzone
> "The only way to discover the limits of the possible is to venture a little
> way past them into the impossible."
> Arthur C. Clarke
> WITHOUT PREJUDICE
>
> Without prejudice to the generality of the contents herein, this
> communication does not attach any legal liability on the originator thereof.
> This communication contains information, which is private in nature,
> confidential and may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the
> intended recipient(s). If you have received this communication by error, or
> have received it by means of interception, please delete the email and
> destroy any copies of it.The message herein the subject of this mailing is
> designed to provide information in regard to the subject matter covered. It
> is provided with the understanding that the sender of this information is
> not engaged in rendering legal, medical, accounting or other professional
> services. If legal, medical advice or other professional assistance is
> required, the services of a competent professional person should be sought.
>
>
> From: oxyzone@yahoogroups.com [mailto:oxyzone@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
> DOCTOR HOWARD ROBINS
> Sent: May-19-09 6:43 AM
> To: oxyzone@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [oxyzone] Re: direct IV
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Once again, IT IS EXTREMELY DANGEROUS TO GET TO GET "AIR" IN YOUR BLOOD. THE
> NITROGEN CAN AGGLUTINATE (FORM A BIG BUBBLE) AND KILL YOU. IT CAN KILL YOU.
> ONLY AN INSANE PERSON WOULD TAKE THIS RISK. I DON'T CARE HOW MANY TIMES YOU
> SURVIVE THIS MISTAKE, IT'S WRONG TO DO IT AND IT'S WRONG TO ADVISE ANYONE
> THAT "IT'S O.K.".
>
> It's talk like this that makes me feel that maybe, just maybe, Dr Bocci is
> correct about Direct Iv. ONly trained medical professionals should ever do
> it.
>
> PLEASE BE CAREFUL, AS SMOKEY THE BEAR ONCE SAID "THE LIFE YOU SAVE MAY BE
> YOUR OWN".
>
> DR HOWARD ROBINS
>
> --- On Tue, 5/19/09, Arrow <arrowwind09@...> wrote:
>
> From: Arrow <arrowwind09@...>
> Subject: [oxyzone] Re: direct IV
> To: oxyzone@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Tuesday, May 19, 2009, 1:45 AM
> And even in administering large dosages of air the emboli can be overcome by
> laying on a specific side. As the heart pumps eventually the air breaks up
> and dissipates ....I just don't remember which side you are suppose to lay
> on. Anyone? This is what they do in the hospital if it should occur... in
> many many years of nursing work I have never seen it.
>
> In oxyzone@yahoogroups .com, "edyrayfield@ ..." <edyrayfield@ ...> wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I feel compelled to write about my experience with doing direct IV just to
> calm any fears some of you may have. I have only done it 5 times now, and
> have probably made many mistakes, but the one I'm going to talk about here
> is this. On my third application I accidentally forgot to turn on the
> regulator, I have since put up a procedure list to check off. So I filled
> the syringe with 10cc's of ambient air. I pushed it in and thought something
> was funny as the vein got very large. As I was turning everything off I saw
> what I had done and got a bit fearful from hearing all the talk of
> embolisms. I waited an hour or so and nothing, absolutely nothing happened.
> So I investigated a few pathologists sites and found out that to cause an
> embolism one must inject at least 200 cc's of air. Which of course there
> aren't even syringes that large. I would never do that again, but if it were
> to happen I wouldn't have the fear I did that day. I hope this helps anyone
> having trepidations about this useful form of using ozone in certain
> situations.
> >
> > Edy
> >
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 8.5.329 / Virus Database: 270.12.33/2120 - Release Date: 05/19/09
> 06:21:00
>
They can be used if kept clean and made of silicone. I have had a person use one in the States and we use them in Malaysia, however we have switched to doing what we need with the use of biotherapy. I would assume plastic would disintegrate at the beginning however i do not think it would be an issue inside the body as the ozone has converted by then. Having said that, I would avoid it if not ozone resistant.
"The only way to discover the limits of the possible is to venture a little way past them into the impossible."
Arthur C. Clarke
WITHOUT PREJUDICE Without prejudice to the generality of the contents herein, this communication does not attach any legal liability on the originator thereof. This communication contains information, which is private in nature, confidential and may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the intended recipient(s). If you have received this communication by error, or have received it by means of interception, please delete the email and destroy any copies of it.The message herein the subject of this mailing is designed to provide information in regard to the subject matter covered. It is provided with the understanding that the sender of this information is not engaged in rendering legal, medical, accounting or other professional services. If legal, medical advice or other professional assistance is required, the services of a competent professional person should be sought.
From: oxyzone@yahoogroups.com [mailto:oxyzone@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Arrow Sent: July-07-09 1:01 PM To: oxyzone@yahoogroups.com Subject: [oxyzone] Re: direct IV
Thank You, Peter for your sane reply to this fear mongering.
Technique is everything when doing IV work. My biggest concern with injection of ozone would be if someone were using a pic or central line. I am wondering if you think it is OK to use these kind of lines for direct IV ozone application. One thought I had, since these lines are suppose to stay in place for up to 3 months, would the ozone erode the catheter that is in the vein? Sometimes these catheters are quite long, going from the antecubital insert site, or there abouts, almost all the way to the heart. This would worry me. Have you had experience using ozone with these lines? thanks, Arrow
-- In oxyzone@yahoogroups.com, Peter Professor Ozone Jovanovic <peter@...> wrote: > > Dear all: > > Time for me to say something about this... > > It is my opinion that Edy was sharing a story and not saying that it is ok > to inject air. Merely pointing out what happened so that those of you that > believe ozone IV can create an emboli are misguided due to the lack of > nitrogen. Please as always read as much as you can to be educated. What I > want to say is that there are many references, which I have included some > and it is up to all of you what you believe or interpret from what is > stated. As in all cases do not do what others tell you, research and only do > what you are comfortable with and accept responsibility for it. > > For the record, in my time with many thousands of those treated in our > clinics and hospitals, I have never come across one person that suffered > from an embolism, although we have always used pure oxygen and medical ozone > units. > > > http://www.merck.com/mmhe/sec04/ch046/ch046a.html > > http://www.vascularweb.org/patients/NorthPoint/Pulmonary_Embolism.html > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air_embolism > > http://www.impactednurse.com/?p=303 > > http://www.politedissent.com/archives/1873 > > http://www.secondopinionnewsletter.com/pages.aspx/28/Hydrogen%20Peroxide%20D > oesn%27t%20Kill%20Patients,%20Drugs%20Do!/ > > http://www.nhs.uk/conditions/embolism/Pages/Introduction.aspx > I'm a vet, and I can say that some of the ideas people have suggested would > only work with a very big needle or if you were very lucky. > We sometimes inject euthenasia solution into the heart to euthenase animals > (under unusual circumstances). The actual needle going in does not cause > death, only the chemical, which is an overdose of anaesthetic. So you could > cause death by injecting something through the needle into the heart, if it > was a hypodermic, but not with the needle itself, unless you had dipped it > in a toxin of some kind beforehand. Also, it can be quite hard to hit the > heart even if you have been trained to do so, so your torturer might not > manage. > An air embolus in a vein is not always fatal, it depends where it ends up. > Medics (human and veterinary) try to avoid running air bubbles through > drips, but it does sometimes happen, and usually it doesn't cause a problem. > You could not easily kill someone by sticking a needle into an artery. For > one thing, arteries have thick rubbery walls and are not that easy to > pierce: they tend to slip off the needle. For another, blood clots fast, and > you would need a big hole for blood to flow out faster than the clot blocked > it for long enough for the person to bleed out and die. More likely, you'd > just end up with a big painful bruise. The same is true of puncturing a > vein. > I think the best method would be via the brain, as someone else said. This > is basically what they do when they pith frogs for physiology experiments > (or used to). You could try sticking the needle up through the hard palate, > in through the nose or back of the eye socket, or perhaps through an ear, > but in all cases you would need a big, strong needle and a hammer. A skewer > might work better. I don't think many of these would be instant. Also bear > in mind that the brain itself does not feel pain because it has no pain > receptors, so while the damage on the way through the skull would be > excruciating, the brain bit wouldn't hurt. > Or, if you wanted to do it very slowly, you could stick the needle through > their abdomen and into their guts a few times (not all that easy either: > guts tend to slip out of the way). Then intestinal bacteria would leak into > the abdomen and they'd get peritonitis, become very ill, and die: but it > would take days and days, and not be guaranteed. > Yuck. > Murder by air embolism is quite rare, despite the strong chances of a > murderer escaping scot free in such cases. This is because such a technique > requires great skill. Not everyone can handle a syringe, let alone puncture > a vein successfully with it. I have a nagging fear that such type of murder > might be very common among the drug addicts of our country. They are quite > suited for committing such types of murder. They can handle syringes very > deftly (almost as deftly as doctors, as they have to inject the drugs > through the syringe all the time), and they need to do away with people > fairly commonly. > In my whole life, I have encountered just one case of murder by air embolism > and that too when I was in Edinburgh. The case was of a doctor husband who > had got tired of his nagging wife. The husband was carrying on an affair > with one of his female patients and his wife had got hint of that. She was > having fits of faintness for quite sometime. So one day the doctor filled up > a large syringe with air and injected air into her veins under the pretext > that he was giving her some drug. About 200 c.c. of air is required to kill > a person by air embolism. I do not know how he managed to inject that much > amount through a syringe. Even a commonly used large syringe takes in about > 20 c.c. of air only. He might have used a bigger syringe or may be he > repeatedly pushed the air inside by removing the piston from the syringe > again and again. Well, the important thing is that he did use the air for > committing the murder. He would have gone scot free, but when I asked one of > the witnesses as to what were the symptoms of the lady when she was dying, I > was told that she was gasping for air. This immediately alerted me. This is > a symptom of air embolism as we have already seen. Coupled with this was the > fact that her husband was a doctor. He was ideally suited for committing > such a type of act. So before opening the body, I decided to take a > radiograph (X-ray) of the body. Sure enough the bubbles of air could be seen > in the deceased woman's pulmonary arteries. Then I looked at the dead > woman's forearms. They showed marks of injection. Immediately I alerted the > Lothian and Borders Police (the police force that mans the city of > Edinburgh). A detailed interrogation was done and sure enough the doctor > admitted his guilt. This was yet another victory of Forensic Medicine. > > So we're left to wonder once again, can a shot of air really kill someone? > The Real Story: Possibly, but only a real tool would test it out. > Bubbles of air in the circulating blood can cause death or brain damage, if > the air bubble cuts off the blood supply to your brain. > However, according to Dr. Barry Wolcott MD, FACP, senior vice president of > clinical affairs for WebMD <http://www.webmd.com> Health, "In general, the > small amount of air that can be introduced by a typical syringe is not large > enough to cause a fatal air embolism (an air embolism is similar to a blood > clot)." > Dr. Wolcott explained, "the large amounts of air that can quickly enter > through a large plastic catheter which is open to the air - like those > placed in the neck or under the collarbone during resuscitations in > hospitals and at accident scenes - can be fatal, especially if the patient > inhales forcefully while the catheter is open to the air." > > > May God Bless You And Keep You Well > > Peter (Professor Ozone) Jovanovic > <http://www.ozoneuniversity.com/> www.ozoneuniversity.com > <http://www.ozonehospital.com/> www.ozonehospital.com > <http://www.oxygentherapyexperts.com/> www.oxygentherapyexperts.com > <http://www.medicalozone.info/> www.medicalozone.info > <http://www.bloodozonation.com/> www.bloodozonation.com > <http://www.youtube.com/user/ozoneresearch> > http://www.youtube.com/user/ozoneresearch > Phone - +1-604-501-6051 > Fax - +1-440-550-5610 > Ozone Research Group > Founder > Skype ID - ozoneresearch > Yahoo ID - humansafe2001 > Yahoo Group Owner - <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/oxyzone> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/oxyzone > "The only way to discover the limits of the possible is to venture a little > way past them into the impossible." > Arthur C. Clarke > WITHOUT PREJUDICE > > Without prejudice to the generality of the contents herein, this > communication does not attach any legal liability on the originator thereof. > This communication contains information, which is private in nature, > confidential and may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the > intended recipient(s). If you have received this communication by error, or > have received it by means of interception, please delete the email and > destroy any copies of it.The message herein the subject of this mailing is > designed to provide information in regard to the subject matter covered. It > is provided with the understanding that the sender of this information is > not engaged in rendering legal, medical, accounting or other professional > services. If legal, medical advice or other professional assistance is > required, the services of a competent professional person should be sought. > > > From: oxyzone@yahoogroups.com [mailto:oxyzone@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of > DOCTOR HOWARD ROBINS > Sent: May-19-09 6:43 AM > To: oxyzone@yahoogroups.com > Subject: Re: [oxyzone] Re: direct IV > > > > > > > Once again, IT IS EXTREMELY DANGEROUS TO GET TO GET "AIR" IN YOUR BLOOD. THE > NITROGEN CAN AGGLUTINATE (FORM A BIG BUBBLE) AND KILL YOU. IT CAN KILL YOU. > ONLY AN INSANE PERSON WOULD TAKE THIS RISK. I DON'T CARE HOW MANY TIMES YOU > SURVIVE THIS MISTAKE, IT'S WRONG TO DO IT AND IT'S WRONG TO ADVISE ANYONE > THAT "IT'S O.K.". > > It's talk like this that makes me feel that maybe, just maybe, Dr Bocci is > correct about Direct Iv. ONly trained medical professionals should ever do > it. > > PLEASE BE CAREFUL, AS SMOKEY THE BEAR ONCE SAID "THE LIFE YOU SAVE MAY BE > YOUR OWN". > > DR HOWARD ROBINS > > --- On Tue, 5/19/09, Arrow <arrowwind09@...> wrote: > > From: Arrow <arrowwind09@...> > Subject: [oxyzone] Re: direct IV > To: oxyzone@yahoogroups.com > Date: Tuesday, May 19, 2009, 1:45 AM > And even in administering large dosages of air the emboli can be overcome by > laying on a specific side. As the heart pumps eventually the air breaks up > and dissipates ....I just don't remember which side you are suppose to lay > on. Anyone? This is what they do in the hospital if it should occur... in > many many years of nursing work I have never seen it. > > In oxyzone@yahoogroups .com, "edyrayfield@ ..." <edyrayfield@ ...> wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > I feel compelled to write about my experience with doing direct IV just to > calm any fears some of you may have. I have only done it 5 times now, and > have probably made many mistakes, but the one I'm going to talk about here > is this. On my third application I accidentally forgot to turn on the > regulator, I have since put up a procedure list to check off. So I filled > the syringe with 10cc's of ambient air. I pushed it in and thought something > was funny as the vein got very large. As I was turning everything off I saw > what I had done and got a bit fearful from hearing all the talk of > embolisms. I waited an hour or so and nothing, absolutely nothing happened. > So I investigated a few pathologists sites and found out that to cause an > embolism one must inject at least 200 cc's of air. Which of course there > aren't even syringes that large. I would never do that again, but if it were > to happen I wouldn't have the fear I did that day. I hope this helps anyone > having trepidations about this useful form of using ozone in certain > situations. > > > > Edy > > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 8.5.329 / Virus Database: 270.12.33/2120 - Release Date: 05/19/09 > 06:21:00 >
In oxyzone@yahoogroups.com, "Peter (Professor Ozone) Jovanovic" <peter@...>
wrote:
>
> My pleasure....
>
>
>
> They can be used if kept clean and made of silicone. I have had a person use
> one in the States and we use them in Malaysia, however we have switched to
> doing what we need with the use of biotherapy. I would assume plastic would
> disintegrate at the beginning however i do not think it would be an issue
> inside the body as the ozone has converted by then. Having said that, I
> would avoid it if not ozone resistant.
>
>
>
> May God Bless You And Keep You Well
>
>
>
> Peter (Professor Ozone) Jovanovic
>
> www.ozoneuniversity.com <http://www.ozoneuniversity.com/>
>
> www.ozonehospital.com <http://www.ozonehospital.com/>
>
> www.oxygentherapyexperts.com <http://www.oxygentherapyexperts.com/>
>
> www.medicalozone.info <http://www.medicalozone.info/>
>
> www.bloodozonation.com <http://www.bloodozonation.com/>
>
> http://www.youtube.com/user/ozoneresearch
>
> Phone - +1-604-501-6051
>
> Fax - +1-440-550-5610
>
> Ozone Research Group
>
> Founder
>
> Skype ID - ozoneresearch
>
> Yahoo ID - humansafe2001
>
> Yahoo Group Owner - http://groups.yahoo.com/group/oxyzone
>
> "The only way to discover the limits of the possible is to venture a little
> way past them into the impossible."
>
> Arthur C. Clarke
>
> WITHOUT PREJUDICE
>
> Without prejudice to the generality of the contents herein, this
> communication does not attach any legal liability on the originator thereof.
> This communication contains information, which is private in nature,
> confidential and may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the
> intended recipient(s). If you have received this communication by error, or
> have received it by means of interception, please delete the email and
> destroy any copies of it.The message herein the subject of this mailing is
> designed to provide information in regard to the subject matter covered. It
> is provided with the understanding that the sender of this information is
> not engaged in rendering legal, medical, accounting or other professional
> services. If legal, medical advice or other professional assistance is
> required, the services of a competent professional person should be sought.
>
>
>
>
> From: oxyzone@yahoogroups.com [mailto:oxyzone@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
> Arrow
> Sent: July-07-09 1:01 PM
> To: oxyzone@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [oxyzone] Re: direct IV
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Thank You, Peter for your sane reply to this fear mongering.
>
> Technique is everything when doing IV work. My biggest concern with
> injection of ozone
> would be if someone were using a pic or central line. I am wondering if you
> think it is OK to use these kind of lines for direct IV ozone application.
> One thought I had, since these lines are suppose to stay in place for up to
> 3 months, would the ozone erode the catheter that is in the vein? Sometimes
> these catheters are quite long, going from the antecubital insert site, or
> there abouts, almost all the way to the heart. This would worry me. Have you
> had experience using ozone with these lines?
> thanks,
> Arrow
>
> -- In oxyzone@yahoogroups.com <mailto:oxyzone%40yahoogroups.com> , Peter
> Professor Ozone Jovanovic <peter@> wrote:
> >
> > Dear all:
> >
> > Time for me to say something about this...
> >
> > It is my opinion that Edy was sharing a story and not saying that it is ok
> > to inject air. Merely pointing out what happened so that those of you that
> > believe ozone IV can create an emboli are misguided due to the lack of
> > nitrogen. Please as always read as much as you can to be educated. What I
> > want to say is that there are many references, which I have included some
> > and it is up to all of you what you believe or interpret from what is
> > stated. As in all cases do not do what others tell you, research and only
> do
> > what you are comfortable with and accept responsibility for it.
> >
> > For the record, in my time with many thousands of those treated in our
> > clinics and hospitals, I have never come across one person that suffered
> > from an embolism, although we have always used pure oxygen and medical
> ozone
> > units.
> >
> >
> > http://www.merck.com/mmhe/sec04/ch046/ch046a.html
> >
> > http://www.vascularweb.org/patients/NorthPoint/Pulmonary_Embolism.html
> >
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air_embolism
> >
> > http://www.impactednurse.com/?p=303
> >
> > http://www.politedissent.com/archives/1873
> >
> >
> http://www.secondopinionnewsletter.com/pages.aspx/28/Hydrogen%20Peroxide%20D
> > oesn%27t%20Kill%20Patients,%20Drugs%20Do!/
> >
> > http://www.nhs.uk/conditions/embolism/Pages/Introduction.aspx
> > I'm a vet, and I can say that some of the ideas people have suggested
> would
> > only work with a very big needle or if you were very lucky.
> > We sometimes inject euthenasia solution into the heart to euthenase
> animals
> > (under unusual circumstances). The actual needle going in does not cause
> > death, only the chemical, which is an overdose of anaesthetic. So you
> could
> > cause death by injecting something through the needle into the heart, if
> it
> > was a hypodermic, but not with the needle itself, unless you had dipped it
> > in a toxin of some kind beforehand. Also, it can be quite hard to hit the
> > heart even if you have been trained to do so, so your torturer might not
> > manage.
> > An air embolus in a vein is not always fatal, it depends where it ends up.
> > Medics (human and veterinary) try to avoid running air bubbles through
> > drips, but it does sometimes happen, and usually it doesn't cause a
> problem.
> > You could not easily kill someone by sticking a needle into an artery. For
> > one thing, arteries have thick rubbery walls and are not that easy to
> > pierce: they tend to slip off the needle. For another, blood clots fast,
> and
> > you would need a big hole for blood to flow out faster than the clot
> blocked
> > it for long enough for the person to bleed out and die. More likely, you'd
> > just end up with a big painful bruise. The same is true of puncturing a
> > vein.
> > I think the best method would be via the brain, as someone else said. This
> > is basically what they do when they pith frogs for physiology experiments
> > (or used to). You could try sticking the needle up through the hard
> palate,
> > in through the nose or back of the eye socket, or perhaps through an ear,
> > but in all cases you would need a big, strong needle and a hammer. A
> skewer
> > might work better. I don't think many of these would be instant. Also bear
> > in mind that the brain itself does not feel pain because it has no pain
> > receptors, so while the damage on the way through the skull would be
> > excruciating, the brain bit wouldn't hurt.
> > Or, if you wanted to do it very slowly, you could stick the needle through
> > their abdomen and into their guts a few times (not all that easy either:
> > guts tend to slip out of the way). Then intestinal bacteria would leak
> into
> > the abdomen and they'd get peritonitis, become very ill, and die: but it
> > would take days and days, and not be guaranteed.
> > Yuck.
> > Murder by air embolism is quite rare, despite the strong chances of a
> > murderer escaping scot free in such cases. This is because such a
> technique
> > requires great skill. Not everyone can handle a syringe, let alone
> puncture
> > a vein successfully with it. I have a nagging fear that such type of
> murder
> > might be very common among the drug addicts of our country. They are quite
> > suited for committing such types of murder. They can handle syringes very
> > deftly (almost as deftly as doctors, as they have to inject the drugs
> > through the syringe all the time), and they need to do away with people
> > fairly commonly.
> > In my whole life, I have encountered just one case of murder by air
> embolism
> > and that too when I was in Edinburgh. The case was of a doctor husband who
> > had got tired of his nagging wife. The husband was carrying on an affair
> > with one of his female patients and his wife had got hint of that. She was
> > having fits of faintness for quite sometime. So one day the doctor filled
> up
> > a large syringe with air and injected air into her veins under the pretext
> > that he was giving her some drug. About 200 c.c. of air is required to
> kill
> > a person by air embolism. I do not know how he managed to inject that much
> > amount through a syringe. Even a commonly used large syringe takes in
> about
> > 20 c.c. of air only. He might have used a bigger syringe or may be he
> > repeatedly pushed the air inside by removing the piston from the syringe
> > again and again. Well, the important thing is that he did use the air for
> > committing the murder. He would have gone scot free, but when I asked one
> of
> > the witnesses as to what were the symptoms of the lady when she was dying,
> I
> > was told that she was gasping for air. This immediately alerted me. This
> is
> > a symptom of air embolism as we have already seen. Coupled with this was
> the
> > fact that her husband was a doctor. He was ideally suited for committing
> > such a type of act. So before opening the body, I decided to take a
> > radiograph (X-ray) of the body. Sure enough the bubbles of air could be
> seen
> > in the deceased woman's pulmonary arteries. Then I looked at the dead
> > woman's forearms. They showed marks of injection. Immediately I alerted
> the
> > Lothian and Borders Police (the police force that mans the city of
> > Edinburgh). A detailed interrogation was done and sure enough the doctor
> > admitted his guilt. This was yet another victory of Forensic Medicine.
> >
> > So we're left to wonder once again, can a shot of air really kill someone?
>
> > The Real Story: Possibly, but only a real tool would test it out.
> > Bubbles of air in the circulating blood can cause death or brain damage,
> if
> > the air bubble cuts off the blood supply to your brain.
> > However, according to Dr. Barry Wolcott MD, FACP, senior vice president of
> > clinical affairs for WebMD <http://www.webmd.com> Health, "In general, the
> > small amount of air that can be introduced by a typical syringe is not
> large
> > enough to cause a fatal air embolism (an air embolism is similar to a
> blood
> > clot)."
> > Dr. Wolcott explained, "the large amounts of air that can quickly enter
> > through a large plastic catheter which is open to the air - like those
> > placed in the neck or under the collarbone during resuscitations in
> > hospitals and at accident scenes - can be fatal, especially if the patient
> > inhales forcefully while the catheter is open to the air."
> >
> >
> > May God Bless You And Keep You Well
> >
> > Peter (Professor Ozone) Jovanovic
> > <http://www.ozoneuniversity.com/> www.ozoneuniversity.com
> > <http://www.ozonehospital.com/> www.ozonehospital.com
> > <http://www.oxygentherapyexperts.com/> www.oxygentherapyexperts.com
> > <http://www.medicalozone.info/> www.medicalozone.info
> > <http://www.bloodozonation.com/> www.bloodozonation.com
> > <http://www.youtube.com/user/ozoneresearch>
> > http://www.youtube.com/user/ozoneresearch
> > Phone - +1-604-501-6051
> > Fax - +1-440-550-5610
> > Ozone Research Group
> > Founder
> > Skype ID - ozoneresearch
> > Yahoo ID - humansafe2001
> > Yahoo Group Owner - <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/oxyzone>
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/oxyzone
> > "The only way to discover the limits of the possible is to venture a
> little
> > way past them into the impossible."
> > Arthur C. Clarke
> > WITHOUT PREJUDICE
> >
> > Without prejudice to the generality of the contents herein, this
> > communication does not attach any legal liability on the originator
> thereof.
> > This communication contains information, which is private in nature,
> > confidential and may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of
> the
> > intended recipient(s). If you have received this communication by error,
> or
> > have received it by means of interception, please delete the email and
> > destroy any copies of it.The message herein the subject of this mailing is
> > designed to provide information in regard to the subject matter covered.
> It
> > is provided with the understanding that the sender of this information is
> > not engaged in rendering legal, medical, accounting or other professional
> > services. If legal, medical advice or other professional assistance is
> > required, the services of a competent professional person should be
> sought.
> >
> >
> > From: oxyzone@yahoogroups.com <mailto:oxyzone%40yahoogroups.com>
> [mailto:oxyzone@yahoogroups.com <mailto:oxyzone%40yahoogroups.com> ] On
> Behalf Of
> > DOCTOR HOWARD ROBINS
> > Sent: May-19-09 6:43 AM
> > To: oxyzone@yahoogroups.com <mailto:oxyzone%40yahoogroups.com>
> > Subject: Re: [oxyzone] Re: direct IV
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Once again, IT IS EXTREMELY DANGEROUS TO GET TO GET "AIR" IN YOUR BLOOD.
> THE
> > NITROGEN CAN AGGLUTINATE (FORM A BIG BUBBLE) AND KILL YOU. IT CAN KILL
> YOU.
> > ONLY AN INSANE PERSON WOULD TAKE THIS RISK. I DON'T CARE HOW MANY TIMES
> YOU
> > SURVIVE THIS MISTAKE, IT'S WRONG TO DO IT AND IT'S WRONG TO ADVISE ANYONE
> > THAT "IT'S O.K.".
> >
> > It's talk like this that makes me feel that maybe, just maybe, Dr Bocci is
> > correct about Direct Iv. ONly trained medical professionals should ever do
> > it.
> >
> > PLEASE BE CAREFUL, AS SMOKEY THE BEAR ONCE SAID "THE LIFE YOU SAVE MAY BE
> > YOUR OWN".
> >
> > DR HOWARD ROBINS
> >
> > --- On Tue, 5/19/09, Arrow <arrowwind09@> wrote:
> >
> > From: Arrow <arrowwind09@>
> > Subject: [oxyzone] Re: direct IV
> > To: oxyzone@yahoogroups.com <mailto:oxyzone%40yahoogroups.com>
> > Date: Tuesday, May 19, 2009, 1:45 AM
> > And even in administering large dosages of air the emboli can be overcome
> by
> > laying on a specific side. As the heart pumps eventually the air breaks up
> > and dissipates ....I just don't remember which side you are suppose to lay
> > on. Anyone? This is what they do in the hospital if it should occur... in
> > many many years of nursing work I have never seen it.
> >
> > In oxyzone@yahoogroups .com, "edyrayfield@ ..." <edyrayfield@ ...> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I feel compelled to write about my experience with doing direct IV just
> to
> > calm any fears some of you may have. I have only done it 5 times now, and
> > have probably made many mistakes, but the one I'm going to talk about here
> > is this. On my third application I accidentally forgot to turn on the
> > regulator, I have since put up a procedure list to check off. So I filled
> > the syringe with 10cc's of ambient air. I pushed it in and thought
> something
> > was funny as the vein got very large. As I was turning everything off I
> saw
> > what I had done and got a bit fearful from hearing all the talk of
> > embolisms. I waited an hour or so and nothing, absolutely nothing
> happened.
> > So I investigated a few pathologists sites and found out that to cause an
> > embolism one must inject at least 200 cc's of air. Which of course there
> > aren't even syringes that large. I would never do that again, but if it
> were
> > to happen I wouldn't have the fear I did that day. I hope this helps
> anyone
> > having trepidations about this useful form of using ozone in certain
> > situations.
> > >
> > > Edy
> > >
> >
> > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> > Version: 8.5.329 / Virus Database: 270.12.33/2120 - Release Date: 05/19/09
> > 06:21:00
> >
>
"The only way to discover the limits of the possible is to venture a little way past them into the impossible."
Arthur C. Clarke
WITHOUT PREJUDICE Without prejudice to the generality of the contents herein, this communication does not attach any legal liability on the originator thereof. This communication contains information, which is private in nature, confidential and may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the intended recipient(s). If you have received this communication by error, or have received it by means of interception, please delete the email and destroy any copies of it.The message herein the subject of this mailing is designed to provide information in regard to the subject matter covered. It is provided with the understanding that the sender of this information is not engaged in rendering legal, medical, accounting or other professional services. If legal, medical advice or other professional assistance is required, the services of a competent professional person should be sought.
From: oxyzone@yahoogroups.com [mailto:oxyzone@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Arrow Sent: July-09-09 4:58 PM To: oxyzone@yahoogroups.com Subject: [oxyzone] Re: direct IV
And what is biotherapy? Arrow
In oxyzone@yahoogroups.com, "Peter (Professor Ozone) Jovanovic" <peter@...> wrote: > > My pleasure.... > > > > They can be used if kept clean and made of silicone. I have had a person use > one in the States and we use them in Malaysia, however we have switched to > doing what we need with the use of biotherapy. I would assume plastic would > disintegrate at the beginning however i do not think it would be an issue > inside the body as the ozone has converted by then. Having said that, I > would avoid it if not ozone resistant. > > > > May God Bless You And Keep You Well > > > > Peter (Professor Ozone) Jovanovic > > www.ozoneuniversity.com <http://www.ozoneuniversity.com/> > > www.ozonehospital.com <http://www.ozonehospital.com/> > > www.oxygentherapyexperts.com <http://www.oxygentherapyexperts.com/> > > www.medicalozone.info <http://www.medicalozone.info/> > > www.bloodozonation.com <http://www.bloodozonation.com/> > > http://www.youtube.com/user/ozoneresearch > > Phone - +1-604-501-6051 > > Fax - +1-440-550-5610 > > Ozone Research Group > > Founder > > Skype ID - ozoneresearch > > Yahoo ID - humansafe2001 > > Yahoo Group Owner - http://groups.yahoo.com/group/oxyzone > > "The only way to discover the limits of the possible is to venture a little > way past them into the impossible." > > Arthur C. Clarke > > WITHOUT PREJUDICE > > Without prejudice to the generality of the contents herein, this > communication does not attach any legal liability on the originator thereof. > This communication contains information, which is private in nature, > confidential and may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the > intended recipient(s). If you have received this communication by error, or > have received it by means of interception, please delete the email and > destroy any copies of it.The message herein the subject of this mailing is > designed to provide information in regard to the subject matter covered. It > is provided with the understanding that the sender of this information is > not engaged in rendering legal, medical, accounting or other professional > services. If legal, medical advice or other professional assistance is > required, the services of a competent professional person should be sought. > > > > > From: oxyzone@yahoogroups.com [mailto:oxyzone@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of > Arrow > Sent: July-07-09 1:01 PM > To: oxyzone@yahoogroups.com > Subject: [oxyzone] Re: direct IV > > > > > > > > > Thank You, Peter for your sane reply to this fear mongering. > > Technique is everything when doing IV work. My biggest concern with > injection of ozone > would be if someone were using a pic or central line. I am wondering if you > think it is OK to use these kind of lines for direct IV ozone application. > One thought I had, since these lines are suppose to stay in place for up to > 3 months, would the ozone erode the catheter that is in the vein? Sometimes > these catheters are quite long, going from the antecubital insert site, or > there abouts, almost all the way to the heart. This would worry me. Have you > had experience using ozone with these lines? > thanks, > Arrow > > -- In oxyzone@yahoogroups.com <mailto:oxyzone%40yahoogroups.com> , Peter > Professor Ozone Jovanovic <peter@> wrote: > > > > Dear all: > > > > Time for me to say something about this... > > > > It is my opinion that Edy was sharing a story and not saying that it is ok > > to inject air. Merely pointing out what happened so that those of you that > > believe ozone IV can create an emboli are misguided due to the lack of > > nitrogen. Please as always read as much as you can to be educated. What I > > want to say is that there are many references, which I have included some > > and it is up to all of you what you believe or interpret from what is > > stated. As in all cases do not do what others tell you, research and only > do > > what you are comfortable with and accept responsibility for it. > > > > For the record, in my time with many thousands of those treated in our > > clinics and hospitals, I have never come across one person that suffered > > from an embolism, although we have always used pure oxygen and medical > ozone > > units. > > > > > > http://www.merck.com/mmhe/sec04/ch046/ch046a.html > > > > http://www.vascularweb.org/patients/NorthPoint/Pulmonary_Embolism.html > > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air_embolism > > > > http://www.impactednurse.com/?p=303 > > > > http://www.politedissent.com/archives/1873 > > > > > http://www.secondopinionnewsletter.com/pages.aspx/28/Hydrogen%20Peroxide%20D > > oesn%27t%20Kill%20Patients,%20Drugs%20Do!/ > > > > http://www.nhs.uk/conditions/embolism/Pages/Introduction.aspx > > I'm a vet, and I can say that some of the ideas people have suggested > would > > only work with a very big needle or if you were very lucky. > > We sometimes inject euthenasia solution into the heart to euthenase > animals > > (under unusual circumstances). The actual needle going in does not cause > > death, only the chemical, which is an overdose of anaesthetic. So you > could > > cause death by injecting something through the needle into the heart, if > it > > was a hypodermic, but not with the needle itself, unless you had dipped it > > in a toxin of some kind beforehand. Also, it can be quite hard to hit the > > heart even if you have been trained to do so, so your torturer might not > > manage. > > An air embolus in a vein is not always fatal, it depends where it ends up. > > Medics (human and veterinary) try to avoid running air bubbles through > > drips, but it does sometimes happen, and usually it doesn't cause a > problem. > > You could not easily kill someone by sticking a needle into an artery. For > > one thing, arteries have thick rubbery walls and are not that easy to > > pierce: they tend to slip off the needle. For another, blood clots fast, > and > > you would need a big hole for blood to flow out faster than the clot > blocked > > it for long enough for the person to bleed out and die. More likely, you'd > > just end up with a big painful bruise. The same is true of puncturing a > > vein. > > I think the best method would be via the brain, as someone else said. This > > is basically what they do when they pith frogs for physiology experiments > > (or used to). You could try sticking the needle up through the hard > palate, > > in through the nose or back of the eye socket, or perhaps through an ear, > > but in all cases you would need a big, strong needle and a hammer. A > skewer > > might work better. I don't think many of these would be instant. Also bear > > in mind that the brain itself does not feel pain because it has no pain > > receptors, so while the damage on the way through the skull would be > > excruciating, the brain bit wouldn't hurt. > > Or, if you wanted to do it very slowly, you could stick the needle through > > their abdomen and into their guts a few times (not all that easy either: > > guts tend to slip out of the way). Then intestinal bacteria would leak > into > > the abdomen and they'd get peritonitis, become very ill, and die: but it > > would take days and days, and not be guaranteed. > > Yuck. > > Murder by air embolism is quite rare, despite the strong chances of a > > murderer escaping scot free in such cases. This is because such a > technique > > requires great skill. Not everyone can handle a syringe, let alone > puncture > > a vein successfully with it. I have a nagging fear that such type of > murder > > might be very common among the drug addicts of our country. They are quite > > suited for committing such types of murder. They can handle syringes very > > deftly (almost as deftly as doctors, as they have to inject the drugs > > through the syringe all the time), and they need to do away with people > > fairly commonly. > > In my whole life, I have encountered just one case of murder by air > embolism > > and that too when I was in Edinburgh. The case was of a doctor husband who > > had got tired of his nagging wife. The husband was carrying on an affair > > with one of his female patients and his wife had got hint of that. She was > > having fits of faintness for quite sometime. So one day the doctor filled > up > > a large syringe with air and injected air into her veins under the pretext > > that he was giving her some drug. About 200 c.c. of air is required to > kill > > a person by air embolism. I do not know how he managed to inject that much > > amount through a syringe. Even a commonly used large syringe takes in > about > > 20 c.c. of air only. He might have used a bigger syringe or may be he > > repeatedly pushed the air inside by removing the piston from the syringe > > again and again. Well, the important thing is that he did use the air for > > committing the murder. He would have gone scot free, but when I asked one > of > > the witnesses as to what were the symptoms of the lady when she was dying, > I > > was told that she was gasping for air. This immediately alerted me. This > is > > a symptom of air embolism as we have already seen. Coupled with this was > the > > fact that her husband was a doctor. He was ideally suited for committing > > such a type of act. So before opening the body, I decided to take a > > radiograph (X-ray) of the body. Sure enough the bubbles of air could be > seen > > in the deceased woman's pulmonary arteries. Then I looked at the dead > > woman's forearms. They showed marks of injection. Immediately I alerted > the > > Lothian and Borders Police (the police force that mans the city of > > Edinburgh). A detailed interrogation was done and sure enough the doctor > > admitted his guilt. This was yet another victory of Forensic Medicine. > > > > So we're left to wonder once again, can a shot of air really kill someone? > > > The Real Story: Possibly, but only a real tool would test it out. > > Bubbles of air in the circulating blood can cause death or brain damage, > if > > the air bubble cuts off the blood supply to your brain. > > However, according to Dr. Barry Wolcott MD, FACP, senior vice president of > > clinical affairs for WebMD <http://www.webmd.com> Health, "In general, the > > small amount of air that can be introduced by a typical syringe is not > large > > enough to cause a fatal air embolism (an air embolism is similar to a > blood > > clot)." > > Dr. Wolcott explained, "the large amounts of air that can quickly enter > > through a large plastic catheter which is open to the air - like those > > placed in the neck or under the collarbone during resuscitations in > > hospitals and at accident scenes - can be fatal, especially if the patient > > inhales forcefully while the catheter is open to the air." > > > > > > May God Bless You And Keep You Well > > > > Peter (Professor Ozone) Jovanovic > > <http://www.ozoneuniversity.com/> www.ozoneuniversity.com > > <http://www.ozonehospital.com/> www.ozonehospital.com > > <http://www.oxygentherapyexperts.com/> www.oxygentherapyexperts.com > > <http://www.medicalozone.info/> www.medicalozone.info > > <http://www.bloodozonation.com/> www.bloodozonation.com > > <http://www.youtube.com/user/ozoneresearch> > > http://www.youtube.com/user/ozoneresearch > > Phone - +1-604-501-6051 > > Fax - +1-440-550-5610 > > Ozone Research Group > > Founder > > Skype ID - ozoneresearch > > Yahoo ID - humansafe2001 > > Yahoo Group Owner - <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/oxyzone> > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/oxyzone > > "The only way to discover the limits of the possible is to venture a > little > > way past them into the impossible." > > Arthur C. Clarke > > WITHOUT PREJUDICE > > > > Without prejudice to the generality of the contents herein, this > > communication does not attach any legal liability on the originator > thereof. > > This communication contains information, which is private in nature, > > confidential and may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of > the > > intended recipient(s). If you have received this communication by error, > or > > have received it by means of interception, please delete the email and > > destroy any copies of it.The message herein the subject of this mailing is > > designed to provide information in regard to the subject matter covered. > It > > is provided with the understanding that the sender of this information is > > not engaged in rendering legal, medical, accounting or other professional > > services. If legal, medical advice or other professional assistance is > > required, the services of a competent professional person should be > sought. > > > > > > From: oxyzone@yahoogroups.com <mailto:oxyzone%40yahoogroups.com> > [mailto:oxyzone@yahoogroups.com <mailto:oxyzone%40yahoogroups.com> ] On > Behalf Of > > DOCTOR HOWARD ROBINS > > Sent: May-19-09 6:43 AM > > To: oxyzone@yahoogroups.com <mailto:oxyzone%40yahoogroups.com> > > Subject: Re: [oxyzone] Re: direct IV > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Once again, IT IS EXTREMELY DANGEROUS TO GET TO GET "AIR" IN YOUR BLOOD. > THE > > NITROGEN CAN AGGLUTINATE (FORM A BIG BUBBLE) AND KILL YOU. IT CAN KILL > YOU. > > ONLY AN INSANE PERSON WOULD TAKE THIS RISK. I DON'T CARE HOW MANY TIMES > YOU > > SURVIVE THIS MISTAKE, IT'S WRONG TO DO IT AND IT'S WRONG TO ADVISE ANYONE > > THAT "IT'S O.K.". > > > > It's talk like this that makes me feel that maybe, just maybe, Dr Bocci is > > correct about Direct Iv. ONly trained medical professionals should ever do > > it. > > > > PLEASE BE CAREFUL, AS SMOKEY THE BEAR ONCE SAID "THE LIFE YOU SAVE MAY BE > > YOUR OWN". > > > > DR HOWARD ROBINS > > > > --- On Tue, 5/19/09, Arrow <arrowwind09@> wrote: > > > > From: Arrow <arrowwind09@> > > Subject: [oxyzone] Re: direct IV > > To: oxyzone@yahoogroups.com <mailto:oxyzone%40yahoogroups.com> > > Date: Tuesday, May 19, 2009, 1:45 AM > > And even in administering large dosages of air the emboli can be overcome > by > > laying on a specific side. As the heart pumps eventually the air breaks up > > and dissipates ....I just don't remember which side you are suppose to lay > > on. Anyone? This is what they do in the hospital if it should occur... in > > many many years of nursing work I have never seen it. > > > > In oxyzone@yahoogroups .com, "edyrayfield@ ..." <edyrayfield@ ...> wrote: > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > I feel compelled to write about my experience with doing direct IV just > to > > calm any fears some of you may have. I have only done it 5 times now, and > > have probably made many mistakes, but the one I'm going to talk about here > > is this. On my third application I accidentally forgot to turn on the > > regulator, I have since put up a procedure list to check off. So I filled > > the syringe with 10cc's of ambient air. I pushed it in and thought > something > > was funny as the vein got very large. As I was turning everything off I > saw > > what I had done and got a bit fearful from hearing all the talk of > > embolisms. I waited an hour or so and nothing, absolutely nothing > happened. > > So I investigated a few pathologists sites and found out that to cause an > > embolism one must inject at least 200 cc's of air. Which of course there > > aren't even syringes that large. I would never do that again, but if it > were > > to happen I wouldn't have the fear I did that day. I hope this helps > anyone > > having trepidations about this useful form of using ozone in certain > > situations. > > > > > > Edy > > > > > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > > Version: 8.5.329 / Virus Database: 270.12.33/2120 - Release Date: 05/19/09 > > 06:21:00 > > >
Hello Edy, After 5 direct IV's I would like to know if you feel better. Since
direct IV are supposed to be so powerful I am very curious to know what you
may have noticed. Have you had any type of blood work done to measure any values
that might have changes. If Dr. ROBINS reads this I would like to ask him or
Professor PETER what LAB values one might look at measure the effect Ozone is
having on the body. White blood cell count? Red blood cell? Should the CBC
(complete blood count) platlet, neutrophils, lymphocytes, or monocytes change?
Just wondering because I just go some blood work done after 7 Major
AutoHemotherapy sessions and will compare it to my labs work before. The one I
am interested in is my viral load? Thats all for now.
--- In oxyzone@yahoogroups.com, "edyrayfield@..." <edyrayfield@...> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I feel compelled to write about my experience with doing direct IV just to
calm any fears some of you may have. I have only done it 5 times now, and have
probably made many mistakes, but the one I'm going to talk about here is this.
On my third application I accidentally forgot to turn on the regulator, I have
since put up a procedure list to check off. So I filled the syringe with 10cc's
of ambient air. I pushed it in and thought something was funny as the vein got
very large. As I was turning everything off I saw what I had done and got a bit
fearful from hearing all the talk of embolisms. I waited an hour or so and
nothing, absolutely nothing happened. So I investigated a few pathologists
sites and found out that to cause an embolism one must inject at least 200 cc's
of air. Which of course there aren't even syringes that large. I would never
do that again, but if it were to happen I wouldn't have the fear I did that day.
I hope this helps anyone having trepidations about this useful form of using
ozone in certain situations.
>
> Edy
>
The only thing that I can say has happened to me is that I get light headed for a bit and then the next day have a fairly big herx reaction. I don't know if I mentioned it, but I'm dealing with lyme, babesia, candida, heavy metals, toxins, mold, neurotoxins, and many more critters than I'll name here. When I go after them they either make their toxins as they die or the die off is more than I can detox. I've had gene tests done and am unfortunetly missing two very important genes that send the message to enzymes to remove the toxic overload. That said I have to do it by some other means. I do the ozone protocols very slowly and do infrared saunas to try to accomplish this. I think it's quite different for everyone and no I can't afford the tests, but hope to get them done ASAP. I hope this helps.
--- On Tue, 5/19/09, yunnokoslo <yunnokoslo@...> wrote:
From: yunnokoslo <yunnokoslo@...> Subject: [oxyzone] Re: direct IV To: oxyzone@yahoogroups.com Date: Tuesday, May 19, 2009, 4:39 PM
Hello Edy, After 5 direct IV's I would like to know if you feel better. Since direct IV are supposed to be so powerful I am very curious to know what you may have noticed. Have you had any type of blood work done to measure any values that might have changes. If Dr. ROBINS reads this I would like to ask him or Professor PETER what LAB values one might look at measure the effect Ozone is having on the body. White blood cell count? Red blood cell? Should the CBC (complete blood count) platlet, neutrophils, lymphocytes, or monocytes change? Just wondering because I just go some blood work done after 7 Major AutoHemotherapy sessions and will compare it to my labs work before. The one I am interested in is my viral load? Thats all for now.
--- In oxyzone@yahoogroups .com, "edyrayfield@ ..." <edyrayfield@ ...> wrote: > > Hello, > > I feel
compelled to write about my experience with doing direct IV just to calm any fears some of you may have. I have only done it 5 times now, and have probably made many mistakes, but the one I'm going to talk about here is this. On my third application I accidentally forgot to turn on the regulator, I have since put up a procedure list to check off. So I filled the syringe with 10cc's of ambient air. I pushed it in and thought something was funny as the vein got very large. As I was turning everything off I saw what I had done and got a bit fearful from hearing all the talk of embolisms. I waited an hour or so and nothing, absolutely nothing happened. So I investigated a few pathologists sites and found out that to cause an embolism one must inject at least 200 cc's of air. Which of course there aren't even syringes that large. I would never do that again, but if it were to happen I wouldn't have the fear I did that day. I hope this helps anyone having
trepidations about this useful form of using ozone in certain situations. > > Edy >
--- On Tue, 5/19/09, wanda85929 <wanda85929@...> wrote:
From: wanda85929 <wanda85929@...> Subject: [oxyzone] Re: direct IV To: oxyzone@yahoogroups.com Date: Tuesday, May 19, 2009, 12:08 PM
Dr. Howard,
It really is nice to have a real doctor in the group. So many people on these forum play doctor, and will even imply doctor, when they are not at all.
Thanks for you input.
People will often get desperate when very ill.
Gail
-- In oxyzone@yahoogroups .com, DOCTOR HOWARD ROBINS <howardrobins@ ...> wrote:
>
> Once again, IT IS EXTREMELY DANGEROUS TO GET TO GET "AIR" IN YOUR BLOOD. THE NITROGEN CAN AGGLUTINATE (FORM A BIG BUBBLE) AND KILL YOU. IT CAN KILL YOU. ONLY AN INSANE PERSON WOULD TAKE THIS RISK. I DON'T CARE HOW MANY TIMES YOU SURVIVE THIS MISTAKE, IT'S WRONG TO DO IT AND IT'S WRONG TO ADVISE ANYONE THAT "IT'S O.K.".
> It's talk like this that makes me feel that maybe, just maybe, Dr Bocci is correct about Direct Iv. ONly trained medical professionals should ever do it.
> PLEASE BE CAREFUL, AS SMOKEY THE BEAR ONCE SAID "THE LIFE YOU SAVE MAY BE YOUR OWN".
> DR HOWARD ROBINS
>
> --- On Tue, 5/19/09, Arrow <arrowwind09@ ...> wrote:
>
> From: Arrow <arrowwind09@ ...>
> Subject: [oxyzone] Re: direct IV
> To: oxyzone@yahoogroups .com
> Date: Tuesday, May 19, 2009, 1:45 AM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> And even in administering large dosages of air the emboli can be overcome by laying on a specific side. As the heart pumps eventually the air breaks up and dissipates ....I just don't remember which side you are suppose to lay on. Anyone? This is what they do in the hospital if it should occur... in many many years of nursing work I have never seen it.
>
>
>
> In oxyzone@yahoogroups .com, "edyrayfield@ ..." <edyrayfield@ ...> wrote:
>
> >
>
> > Hello,
>
> >
>
> > I feel compelled to write about my experience with doing direct IV just to calm any fears some of you may have. I have only done it 5 times now, and have probably made many mistakes, but the one I'm going to talk about here is this. On my third application I accidentally forgot to turn on the regulator, I have since put up a procedure list to check off. So I filled the syringe with 10cc's of ambient air. I pushed it in and thought something was funny as the vein got very large. As I was turning everything off I saw what I had done and got a bit fearful from hearing all the talk of embolisms. I waited an hour or so and nothing, absolutely nothing happened. So I investigated a few pathologists sites and found out that to cause an embolism one must inject at least 200 cc's of air. Which of course there aren't even syringes that large. I would never do that again, but if it were to happen I wouldn't have the fear I did that day. I hope this
helps
> anyone having trepidations
> about this useful form of using ozone in certain situations.
>
> >
>
> > Edy
>
> >
>
What viral load are you concerned about measuring? Most blood values will not change unless they are abnormal (ie. high WBC's). It usually takes many more than 5 tx's to do it, however. Major auto may diminish the RBC's due to hemolysis. It is also possible to sero-convert from positive to negative for most any virus.
--- On Tue, 5/19/09, yunnokoslo <yunnokoslo@...> wrote:
From: yunnokoslo <yunnokoslo@...> Subject: [oxyzone] Re: direct IV To: oxyzone@yahoogroups.com Date: Tuesday, May 19, 2009, 7:39 PM
Hello Edy, After 5 direct IV's I would like to know if you feel better. Since direct IV are supposed to be so powerful I am very curious to know what you may have noticed. Have you had any type of blood work done to measure any values that might have changes. If Dr. ROBINS reads this I would like to ask him or Professor PETER what LAB values one might look at measure the effect Ozone is having on the body. White blood cell count? Red blood cell? Should the CBC (complete blood count) platlet, neutrophils, lymphocytes, or monocytes change? Just wondering because I just go some blood work done after 7 Major AutoHemotherapy sessions and will compare it to my labs work before. The one I am interested in is my viral load? Thats all for now.
--- In oxyzone@yahoogroups .com, "edyrayfield@ ..." <edyrayfield@ ...> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I feel compelled to write about my experience with doing direct IV just to calm any fears some of you may have. I have only done it 5 times now, and have probably made many mistakes, but the one I'm going to talk about here is this. On my third application I accidentally forgot to turn on the regulator, I have since put up a procedure list to check off. So I filled the syringe with 10cc's of ambient air. I pushed it in and thought something was funny as the vein got very large. As I was turning everything off I saw what I had done and got a bit fearful from hearing all the talk of embolisms. I waited an hour or so and nothing, absolutely nothing happened. So I investigated a few pathologists sites and found out that to cause an embolism one must inject at least 200 cc's of air. Which of course there aren't even syringes that large. I would never do that again, but if it were to happen I wouldn't have the fear I did that day. I hope this helps
anyone having trepidations
about this useful form of using ozone in certain situations.
>
> Edy
>
Yes we do. I have been doing alternative medicine for over 30 years due to my close friend and associate Dr Gary Null. We have performed over 45,000 MAH's and over 105,000 DIV ozone therapies since Jan 1990. We have seen most of the diseases and conditions ozone is used to treat worldwide for the last 18+ years and have been successful in "fixing" all of them in patients who stayed with it long enough. Once again I will have a weekly call-in radio show, this time on the internet so all can listen live or go to the archives and download it. It will begin on Tuesday June 2, at 10am(EST) till 11am on the Progressive Radio Network. I welcome all questions about alternative health and especially bio-oxidative therapies. I will expect Peter to be an honored guest frequently.I will send the call in number out shortly to all.
--- On Wed, 5/20/09, wanda85929
<wanda85929@...> wrote:
From: wanda85929 <wanda85929@...> Subject: [oxyzone] Re: direct IV To: oxyzone@yahoogroups.com Date: Wednesday, May 20, 2009, 12:32 PM
--- In oxyzone@yahoogroups .com, "bob Larson" <bobList@... > wrote:
>
> ...he's a podiatrist. DPM.
>
>
Well, don't they go to medical school and have to pass the boards? Gail
Excellent! Now if my ill and addled brain can remember the times! Maybe you could give us a reminder when the days come? Oh I don't know just an "It's today!" kind of thing. My son in law has a radio show from HI and I still can't remember it. Dang this brain fog is pesky.
--- On Thu, 5/21/09, DOCTOR HOWARD ROBINS <howardrobins@...> wrote:
From: DOCTOR HOWARD ROBINS <howardrobins@...> Subject: Re: [oxyzone] Re: direct IV To: oxyzone@yahoogroups.com Date: Thursday, May 21, 2009, 2:32 PM
Yes we do. I have been doing alternative medicine for over 30 years due to my close friend and associate Dr Gary Null. We have performed over 45,000 MAH's and over 105,000 DIV ozone therapies since Jan 1990. We have seen most of the diseases and conditions ozone is used to treat worldwide for the last 18+ years and have been successful in "fixing" all of them in patients who stayed with it long enough. Once again I will have a weekly call-in radio show, this time on the internet so all can listen live or go to the archives and download it. It will begin on Tuesday June 2, at 10am(EST) till 11am on the Progressive Radio Network. I welcome all questions about alternative health and especially bio-oxidative therapies. I will expect Peter to be an honored guest frequently.I will send the call in number out shortly to all.
--- On Wed, 5/20/09, wanda85929 <wanda85929@yahoo. com> wrote:
From: wanda85929 <wanda85929@yahoo. com> Subject: [oxyzone] Re: direct IV To: oxyzone@yahoogroups .com Date: Wednesday, May 20, 2009, 12:32 PM
--- In oxyzone@yahoogroups .com, "bob Larson" <bobList@... > wrote: > > ...he's a podiatrist. DPM. > > Well, don't they go to medical school and have to pass the boards? Gail
Since the 1960"s podiatrist have ben licensed doctors in the USA doing hospital surgery( I taught surgery for 6 years) as well as having prescribing license including narcotics. I have been an alternative, holistic, complimentary physician since 1979.
--- On Wed, 5/20/09, bob Larson <bobList@...> wrote:
From: bob Larson <bobList@...> Subject: RE: [oxyzone] Re: direct IV To: oxyzone@yahoogroups.com Date: Wednesday, May 20, 2009, 12:42 PM
...more or less. depends on where and when.
it appears that these days that's true in the US. earlier times were
different.
> -----Original Message-----
> >
> Well, don't they go to medical school and have to pass the
> boards? Gail
>