Hi, I have done alot of research on neurofeedback and I keep returning to the
zengar Institute. I do not currently do neurofeedback but It only makes sense to
go with zengar. my question is: Who has used other systems and is currently
using zengar and would you go with any other system at this point?
Thanks for asking! You'll find many of us have used multiple systems over the years, myself included. I have not used any system other than Zengar for many years now. My main reason being that as I piloted efficiency in symptom resolution, outcomes and data comprehension throughout the late 1990's- 2004, Zengar's software always came out on top clinically by a long shot. Additionally, I am able to consistently troubleshoot extrinsic variables, which I find do not stand out as clearly within data generated and displayed on other softwares. The reliability and thoroughness of the training via programming methods has also surpassed other systems capabilities, and my own expectations clinically. I do not have abreaction worries with zengar.
I really enjoy how user friendly the system has gotten to be - outside of my clinical practice, my son started self-training at age 8!! Very effectively. How extraordinary for a child to experience his own ability and exclaim "mom, my brain feels awesome now!"
The convenience of zAmp has really opened up my flexibilty/portability. My flights are much more enjoyable... Very easy to train en route and be refreshed when I land.
It's also been quite interesting to observe the degrees of flexibility, happiness and endurance across the clinicians and users of the various groups as I attend conferences (ISNR, Futurehealth, etc). There has been a noteworthy difference that I see reflected in those who use train on NeurOptimal. This too helped me choose Zengar.
Enjoy your up-coming venture!
Molly Raaymakers www.michiganBrain.com
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
From: "michfrosch" Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 00:36:55 -0000 To: <neurofeedcommunity@yahoogroups.com> Subject: [neurofeedcommunity] zengar
Hi, I have done alot of research on neurofeedback and I keep returning to the zengar Institute. I do not currently do neurofeedback but It only makes sense to go with zengar. my question is: Who has used other systems and is currently using zengar and would you go with any other system at this point?
Perhaps this is more of a Zengar list question, but I'm wondering if
you might share more about what you look for/see in the data as
indicators of extrinsic variables?
I am able to consistently troubleshoot extrinsic variables, which
I find do not stand out as clearly within data generated and displayed
on other softwares.
Respiratory is the and I say that strongly THE biggest extrinsic variable I see slow brain function. I have some prior postings I'll dig up and send to you later on with more detail.
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
From: Karen Shue Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 12:44:21 -0400 To: <neurofeedcommunity@yahoogroups.com> Subject: Re: [neurofeedcommunity] extrinsic variable
Hi Molly:
Perhaps this is more of a Zengar list question, but I'm wondering if you might share more about what you look for/see in the data as indicators of extrinsic variables?
I am able to consistently troubleshoot extrinsic variables, which I find do not stand out as clearly within data generated and displayed on other softwares.
While I'm sure that respiratory-related issues can serve as extrinsic
constraints I wouldn't refer to the their effect as "slow<ing> brain function".
It's not the the EEG "slows", although that may (or may not) be apparent in some
ways of looking at the data. Rather, it's more that the emergent variability in
the EEG is greatly increased and that occurs in a non-averaged, pseudo-random
fashion. What appears as "slowing" of the EEG is one of the effects of the
increased turbulence and emergent variability, not the inverse.
val
--- In neurofeedcommunity@yahoogroups.com, molly.neuro@... wrote:
>
> Respiratory is the and I say that strongly THE biggest extrinsic variable I
see slow brain function. I have some prior postings I'll dig up and send to you
later on with more detail.
> Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Karen Shue <kshue@...>
>
> Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 12:44:21
> To: <neurofeedcommunity@yahoogroups.com>
> Subject: Re: [neurofeedcommunity] extrinsic variable
>
>
> Hi Molly:
>
> Perhaps this is more of a Zengar list question, but I'm wondering if you
> might share more about what you look for/see in the data as indicators
> of extrinsic variables?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Karen
>
> molly.neuro@... wrote:
> >
> > ...
> >
> > I am able to consistently troubleshoot extrinsic variables, which I
> > find do not stand out as clearly within data generated and displayed
> > on other softwares.
> >
>
Yes, when i noted slowing brain function i was refering to how folks describe the observable clinical symptoms they feel such as lethargy, ADD, feeling mentally 'slow' as thoughts don't seem to connect as rapidly, mentally tasks take longer to complete. I did not clarify this on the post.
I wasn't refering to the data/EEG as being impacted by speed, nor have i ever considered that was even possible...that seems a mute point; though i was not clear in stating this. What i typically see is as you note an increase in CCAC measures (usually a significant increasing pattern across a period of time/sessions, which correlates to increasing symptom complaints during that time, as one would expect). Within Western Michigan i seem to have an abundance of opportunity to capture these connections, as over the years I've been training with NF (67%-80%) of my clients' data increase and decrease in emergent variability during the same correlated seasonal periods (estimated tracking of my cases annually across the last 8 years). Correlating symptoms vary within these clients, yet the data patterns have been relatively consistent in changing towards less organized CCAC data with
increased seasonal extrinsic effects; more organized CCAC data as seasonal extrinsics minimize.
--- On Thu, 6/18/09, Val Brown <valdeanebrown@...> wrote:
From: Val Brown <valdeanebrown@...> Subject: [neurofeedcommunity] Re: extrinsic variable To: neurofeedcommunity@yahoogroups.com Date: Thursday, June 18, 2009, 8:14 PM
Molly,
While I'm sure that respiratory- related issues can serve as extrinsic constraints I wouldn't refer to the their effect as "slow<ing> brain function". It's not the the EEG "slows", although that may (or may not) be apparent in some ways of looking at the data. Rather, it's more that the emergent variability in the EEG is greatly increased and that occurs in a non-averaged, pseudo-random fashion. What appears as "slowing" of the EEG is one of the effects of the increased turbulence and emergent variability, not the inverse.
val
--- In neurofeedcommunity@ yahoogroups. com, molly.neuro@ ... wrote: > > Respiratory is the and I say that strongly THE biggest extrinsic variable I see slow brain function. I have some prior postings I'll
dig up and send to you later on with more detail. > Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry > > -----Original Message----- > From: Karen Shue <kshue@...> > > Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 12:44:21 > To: <neurofeedcommunity@ yahoogroups. com> > Subject: Re: [neurofeedcommunity ] extrinsic variable > > > Hi Molly: > > Perhaps this is more of a Zengar list question, but I'm wondering if you > might share more about what you look for/see in the data as indicators > of extrinsic variables? > > Thanks! > > Karen > > molly.neuro@ ... wrote: > > > > ... > > > > I am able to consistently troubleshoot extrinsic
variables, which I > > find do not stand out as clearly within data generated and displayed > > on other softwares. > > >
By the way, one of my very young clients' gastroenterologists told his
mother that severe behavior problems are typical of children with
colitis. The child has been given the antihistamine Singulaire with
wonderful effects on not only his gut, but his behavior (at least when
combined with neurofeedback and very strict attention to his diet). And
another child, with rectification of asthma and sinusitis (Mom has made
major changes in the child's diet, including by the way acidophilus which
can, interestingly, be helpful with sinusitus) is doing wonderfully well
lately at school compared to only weeks ago. Neurofeedback, nutrition,
(and a bit of EFT or neurofeedback when possible for the parents to help
them lower their own reactivity and PTSD from dealing with terrifyingly
out-of-control children, when I only the child is covered for my services)
have been combined for amazing improvements in behavior over a period of
only a few months.
Julie
On Fri, 19 Jun 2009 08:18:48 -0400, Raaymakers Molly
<molly.neuro@...> wrote:
> Yes, when i noted slowing brain function i was refering to how folks
> describe the observable clinical symptoms they feel such as lethargy,
> ADD, feeling mentally 'slow' as thoughts don't seem to connect as
> rapidly, mentally tasks take longer to complete. I did not clarify this
> on the post.
> I wasn't refering to the data/EEG as being impacted by speed, nor have i
> ever considered that was even possible...that seems a mute point; though
> i was not clear in stating this. What i typically see is as you note an
> increase in CCAC measures (usually a significant increasing pattern
> across a period of time/sessions, which correlates to increasing symptom
> complaints during that time, as one would expect). Within Western
> Michigan i seem to have an abundance of opportunity to capture these
> connections, as over the years I've been training with NF (67%-80%) of
> my clients' data increase and decrease in emergent variability during
> the same correlated seasonal periods (estimated tracking of my
> cases annually across the last 8 years). Correlating symptoms
> vary within these clients, yet the data patterns have been relatively
> consistent in changing towards less organized CCAC data with increased
> seasonal extrinsic effects; more organized CCAC
> data as seasonal extrinsics minimize.
>
> --- On Thu, 6/18/09, Val Brown <valdeanebrown@...> wrote:
>
>
> From: Val Brown <valdeanebrown@...>
> Subject: [neurofeedcommunity] Re: extrinsic variable
> To: neurofeedcommunity@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Thursday, June 18, 2009, 8:14 PM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Molly,
>
> While I'm sure that respiratory- related issues can serve as extrinsic
> constraints I wouldn't refer to the their effect as "slow<ing> brain
> function". It's not the the EEG "slows", although that may (or may not)
> be apparent in some ways of looking at the data. Rather, it's more that
> the emergent variability in the EEG is greatly increased and that occurs
> in a non-averaged, pseudo-random fashion. What appears as "slowing" of
> the EEG is one of the effects of the increased turbulence and emergent
> variability, not the inverse.
>
> val
>
> --- In neurofeedcommunity@ yahoogroups. com, molly.neuro@ ... wrote:
>>
>> Respiratory is the and I say that strongly THE biggest extrinsic
>> variable I see slow brain function. I have some prior postings I'll dig
>> up and send to you later on with more detail.
>> Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Karen Shue <kshue@...>
>>
>> Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 12:44:21
>> To: <neurofeedcommunity@ yahoogroups. com>
>> Subject: Re: [neurofeedcommunity ] extrinsic variable
>>
>>
>> Hi Molly:
>>
>> Perhaps this is more of a Zengar list question, but I'm wondering if you
>> might share more about what you look for/see in the data as indicators
>> of extrinsic variables?
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Karen
>>
>> molly.neuro@ ... wrote:
>> >
>> > ...
>> >
>> > I am able to consistently troubleshoot extrinsic variables, which I
>> > find do not stand out as clearly within data generated and displayed
>> > on other softwares.
>> >
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.339 / Virus Database: 270.12.81/2189 - Release Date: 06/20/09
06:15:00
Hello,
I do not qualify as someone who has used other systems. I can only
testify that my clients continue to get positive
results from Zengar... I'm personally distrustful of ANY system that
introduces something into the brain. I respect
and appreciate the non-invasive nature of Zengar. That fact is also a
source of reassurance to my clients...
Michael Andes, LMSW
Ann Arbor, MI
On May 27, 2009, at 8:36 PM, michfrosch wrote:
>
>
> Hi, I have done alot of research on neurofeedback and I keep returning
> to the zengar Institute. I do not currently do neurofeedback but It
> only makes sense to go with zengar. my question is: Who has used other
> systems and is currently using zengar and would you go with any other
> system at this point?
>
>
>
---