Having problems with message search?
Like Molly, I tend to stay away from entrainment to particular frequencies.
I figure something like this...
I'm using a nonlinear feedback approach (ZIN) to give my brain a mirror on its own functioning/processing. By doing this, it lets my brain adjust itself for best resiliency, flexibility, stability.
If I then "push it around" to some specific place using entrainment, am I not interfering with either the training process or the resulsts of the training?
Nor am I confident that we are consciously the best judges of what our brain "needs" (and hence why I use nonlinear, nondirective approaches) -- so it makes a bit iffy as to what to choose for entrainment. (e.g., If a real "type A" thinks they need to be more focused and productive, they might choose something totally different from what they need; someone wanting a "better connection with themselves" might try theta training, and then uncover all sorts of things they can't deal with by themselves, etc.) Nonlinear approaches allow you to go where you need to go, whether you know it or not ;-)
That's my Canadian 2 cents ;-) I think some folks on the list may have combined the two, however, and maybe they can comment more --
Karen
Susan Leahy wrote:
Hello Sally,I have a lot of personal experience with Holosync if you would like to backOn Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 5:07 PM, flintox <salf@exemail.com.au > wrote:
Hi All
I am a newbie here. I have been using Zengar NF for about 10 months
now for therapeutic reasons and have made tremendous progress with
it. I am continuing to use it with a view to bringing about
continuing positive change in my life.
I have recently come across entrainment technology that purports to
help bring about positive change through its use in conjunction with
meditation - such products as Holosync from Centrepointe, the Monroe
Institute and Lifeflow.
I was wondering if anyone had any experience of these types of
products and/or any advice about their use.
Thanks for any feedback.
Sally
.
Offline 
Send Email