Robert:

Thanks for the offer but I really don't think it will make any difference. The
people who
are continuing to complain will continue to complain regardless of what is done.

Each of the points raised about what's supposedly been "wrong" with NeuroCARE
have
been directly countered by the video that was produced and posted back in
August. And
it hasn't made any real difference except, perhaps, to intensify the complaints
and
criticisms.

So doing something to "shut people up who complain" is actually an impossible
task. I
know from direct experience in dealing with just these kinds of issues over the
last 15
years in this field. Those who want to complain will continue to do so, esp
when it's clear
that there isn't any basis for their stated concerns.

val

--- In neurofeedcommunity@yahoogroups.com, "lawson415" <qeeg@...> wrote:
>
> Hi All
>
> John Thompson invited me join a while ago because he said someone on
> this group might be interested in working with me to make a real EEG
> data file one could use to do cross validation between NCP data
> processing and between other software's processing. The goal would be
> to shut people up who complain about alleged inability of ncp to
> process EEG accurately.
>
> I do not own ncp nor have I even seen it work. However, I am tired of
> the content on other lists where some obsess w/ this software and
> waste my time w/ innumerable posts about it.
>
> Here is my offer/request: I have hundreds of EEG recordings. If NCP,
> can read pre-recorded data, I am willing to convert some of my EEG
> data at c3-c4 to ncp data format if someone will define that format
> for me. Once converted, I would share versions of this file or files,
> depending on how ncp works, in different formats w/ people who have
> software that can analyze it. Since people report getting good results
> using ncp software, I would hypothesize a significant correlation
> between ncp results w/ the data I supply and the results of this same
> data analyzed in other software.
>
> My contribution would be the formatted data. I would also be willing
> to provide mean, sd and coefficient of variation info for data in up
> to 10 bands when analyzed in other software.
>
> Any takers?
>
> Robert
>