-------------- Forwarded Message: --------------
From: mcstroke@...
To: janetgslp@...
Subject: FW: Court Decision: "Mental retardation" is not a disability under ADA
Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 21:03:04 +0000
-------------- Forwarded Message: --------------
From: "Luecking, Betsy" <Betsy.Luecking@...>
To: <tgilchrist@...>, <AOHARE@...>, <arlene.mccrehan@...>, <bmellenharrison@...>, <cbuddington@...>, <ccaldwell9@...>, <CraigBrieske@...>, <dcsharp1@...>, <DThomas@...>, <hlsnider@...>, <harry.eisenberg@...>, <jackiesimon@...>, <BARRETTJMBarrett@...>, <jswein@...>, <rileyj@...>, <johngmiers@...>, <kuker-kihl@...>, <Kathy_Kolan@...>, <LKH554@...>, <Fran.Marcus@...>, <mhetchkop@...>, <aldouses@...>, <nelsonjackson@...>, <Rcarlin55@...>, <russ@disa bilityguide.org>, <ShaneFeldman@...>, <slsweezy@...>, <steve.strategies@...>, <smithS@...>, "Washington, Angela" <Angela.washington@...>, "Bruen, Michael" <Michael.Bruen@...>, "Christina M. Byrne" <christina.byrne@...>, "Clem, Carly" <Carly.Clem@...>, "Gilman, Francie" <Francie.Gilman@...>, "Green, Calvin" <Calvin.Green@...>, "Greene, Nancy (HHS)" <Nancy.Greene@...>, "Kenney, John" <John.Kenney@...>, "Luecking, Betsy" <Betsy.Luecking@...>, "Reyazuddin, Yasmin" <Yasmin.Reyazuddin@...>, "Smakula, Phil" <Phil.Smakula@...>, "Taper, Darlene" <Darlene.Taper@...>, <Portia.Willis@...>, <ALL4ALANN@...>, <alovell@chicent e rs.org>, <anitalcohen@...>, <ABreihan@...>, <Ann_Kamenstein@...>, <arden@...>, <bonnie5851@...>, <brandon.becker@...>, <bsaypol@...>, <chschmitt@...>, <carlah914@...>, <chaig@...>, <donaldweiss@...>, <Ccrawford@...>, <charlotte.wade@...>, <dmulvany@...>, <adgraham@...>, <donnie1949@...>, <jedillon1@...>, <emeyer5951@...>, <ebunnag@...>, <etrusilo@...>, <matt.shore@...>, <
Subject: FW: Court Decision: "Mental retardation" is not a disability under ADA
Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 18:03:03 +0000
FYI -
Betsy Tolbert Luecking
Montgomery County Dept. of Health & Human ServicesAging and Disability Services, Program Manager II
Commission on People with Disabilities
Acting ADA Compliance Officer
401 Hungerford Drive, 4th floor
Rockville, MD 20850
240-777-1256 Voice/TTY
Visit our Website!!! www.montgomerycountymd.gov
Click on the orange RESIDENTS box
Scroll down to Resident Services
Click o n Disability Information & Services
-----Original Message-----
From: McCrehan, Arlene [mailto:arlene.mccrehan@...]
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2007 3:46 PM
To: Luecking, Betsy
Subject: FW: Court Decision: "Mental retardation" is not a disability under ADA
Importance: High
Hi Betsy,
This is pretty astonishing news.
Arlene
From: Young, Tony/National [mailto:TYoung@...]
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2007 3:36 PM
To: Diversity Steering Council; Diversity Team; GovernmentalAffairs/Workforce Development; RegionalDirectors; Board Members; Board POC
Subject: Court Decision: "Mental retardation" is not a disability under ADA
Importance: High
I will check with The Arc of the US to determine what they will do. This could mean that an individual with certain intellectual impairments might not qualify for the AbilityOne Program in this Circuit.
Court Decision: "Mental retardation" is not a disability under ADA
In the case of Littleton v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., the Court of Appeals
for the Eleventh Circuit, in an unpublished opinion from May 11, held
that an individual with mental retardation did not have a disability
under the Americans with Disabilities Act.
With guidance from the Alabama Independent Living Center, Mr. Littleton
interviewed for a job as a cart-push associate at Wal-Mart. However he
was not allowed to have his job coach accompany him into the interview,
and he was ultimately not hired.
While acknowledging his intellectual disability, in the Court's
analysis, Littleton, who receives Social Security benefits because of
his disability, was found not to be substantially limited in major life
activities.
The following are excerpts from the court decision:
"We do not doubt that Littleton has certain limitations because of his
mental retardation. In order to qualify as 'disabled' under the ADA,
however, Littleton has the burden of proving that he actually is, is
perceived to be, or has a record of being substantially limited as to
'major life activities' under the ADA.
"It is unclear whether thinking, communicating, and social interaction
are 'major life activities' under the ADA."
The entire court opinion is available as a pdf at:
http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/unpub/ops/200512770.pdf
SOURCE: AAPD
Senior Public Policy Strategist
NISH
8401 Old Courthouse Road
First Floor
Vienna, VA 22182
Phone (571) 226-4567
___________________________________________________________________
Need help with lists? Send an e-mail to GIIDirectory@...