On 10/28/2008 08:56 AM, Kitty Antonik Wakfer wrote:

> As a side comment regarding lack of response from others, I realize
> that this is the closing days of US presidential election campaigning
> and many may be glued to TV sets listening to speeches. (An article
> written by me and published 10/27 will hopefully be of interest and
> value to those who are planning to vote, and even those who are not -
> Just a Charismatic Presidential Candidate? -
> http://tinyurl.com/5fptns ) There was one reply from an individual not
> identified to us, who also did not respond to my 2 message reminders
> of this requirement and encouraging hir to do so. The lack of any
> email reply was the most disappointing.
>
> **Kitty

Hi, Kitty,
I was not aware of the essay re Obama and hypnotism till I saw the
above. THanks. I too would be interested in learning the name of the
author.
Bob

[If you, Bob, or others have comments regarding what I wrote in the article, you
can make comments at OpEdNews.com for 14 days after its publication or do so
here. In the latter case, please use quotes from the article (or my follow-up
reply to a reader's comment there) with any comments or questions.

I think the paper's author anonymity engenders as many problems as the subject
itself and conclusions the author draws.
But as I wrote, the real problem is the fact that so very many people make
decisions on what they hear and see in speeches, rather than from studying the
words of those speeches (and other sources) via text for content of what is and
is not included and the implications. And when the decision is regarding
government, especially voting on who will have control of the legalized use of
force, the matter is grave. **Kitty]