Hi Joe,

Good point, I run at about 3 to 4 hertz alternating polarity. I
should probably slow it down to 1 hertz or less. I believe that what
I am using now has works best, but then again I am using +/- 18
volts instad of straight 9 volts DC as before.

John


--- In microelectricitygermkiller2@yahoogroups.com, "Joe"
<aubug2@...> wrote:


Absolutely yes. Try it across a bum tooth, drain
sinuses, ... .

What they ALL ignore is your equivalent circuit - a
capacitor in parallel w a resistor - that gets the same
results from your supply as when you are connected. You
act like a 'low pass filter'; anything fast causes a
transient current to charge your capacitance, for Vac it
shorts it across the pads so penetration is lowered a lot.

Joe.

--- In microelectricitygermkiller2@yahoogroups.com, "Joe"
<aubug2@...> wrote:
>
> --- In microelectricitygermkiller2@yahoogroups.com, "martin7730"
> <martin7730@> wrote:
> >
> > Hi BG,
> >
> > As you probably know Dr. Robert Beck used 36 volts applied to
two
> > small electrodes over the two arteries on the inside of the same
> > wrist. He had his blood examined and had hospitals supply him
with
> > reports on their own findings and had excellent if not
surprising
> > results. He was very insistant that you need to supply as much
as
> two
> > to three milliamps to the skin to get 50 or more microamps into
> the
> > blood which is needed to affect the pathogens in the blood
> properly
> > enough. He indicated that devices like Hulda Clark's was not
> strong
> > enough to be very effective. Most everyone knows that little
power
> is
> > needed if you target with a sine wave the pathogen at the proper
> > frequency. Using DC or fixed frequency pulses apparently
requires
> > more power. Do you know of any studies that low voltage DC or
> pulses
> > work good enough. We can all site our own positive experiences
but
> is
> > there any real scientific evidence to back it up? The studies at
> > Einstein Medical College indicate that at least 50 microamperes
in
> > the blood is required to affect pathogens. Can 6 volts DC
applied
> to
> > the skin induce that kind of current in the blood?
>
> Absolutely yes. Try it across a bum tooth, drain
> sinuses, ... .
>
> What they ALL ignore is your equivalent circuit - a
> capacitor in parallel w a resistor - that gets the same
> results from your supply as when you are connected. You
> act like a 'low pass filter'; anything fast causes a
> transient current to charge your capacitance, for Vac it
> shorts it across the pads so penetration is lowered a
lot.
>
> Joe.
>
> >
> > John
> >
> > --- In microelectricitygermkiller2@yahoogroups.com, "baby_grand"
> > <bobluhrs@> wrote:
> > >
> > > no, it takes a very high voltage for 5 milliseconds to open
the
> > pores
> > > of a host cell so as to allow viral RNA/DNA to enter the
cell.
> It
> > is
> > > a lab technique, only. You don't do this anytime at home,
> never!
> > It
> > > could stop your heart. You use 4-6 volts steady and reverse
it
> > every
> > > few minutes, like every 5-10. That voltage should not be enuf
> to
> > open
> > > up any cellular pores because it is not strong enough to do
so.
> > >
> > > This theory is used to explain why the cells probably will not
> > absorb
> > > medications easily at these voltages. In some people, there
> have
> > been
> > > such reactions, but it is rarely reported.
> > >
> > > Still, the safe thing to do is the electricity first, then
take
> the
> > > meds after you are done. That way the least exposure to it is
> > > obtained.
> > >
> > > bG
> > >
> >
>