Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
medicalerrors-solutions · medical errors & solutions, support
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Show off your group to the world. Share a photo of your group with us.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Doctor sues girl, 11, over inline-skating collision   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #1095 of 1119 |
Isn't it interesting how the medical profession has come up with this novel idea of disclosure and apology.   Sadly, when one of the those in the profession suffers some sort of avoidable adverse outcome, "Sorry does not work" and here comes the lawsuit.   REALLY, doctor sues girl who was 11 at the time of HER NEGLIGENT ACT>>>>>    What if we were all like this doctor, think about it.   So, folks, where oh where is the outrage?????????????????????????
 
 
 
Doctor sues girl, 11, over inline-skating collision
Says her negligence caused injuries in Chester Twp.

Thursday, March 1, 2007
45 Comments
A bicycling doctor has sued his then-11-year-old inline-skating neighbor for pain and suffering after they collided on their Chester Township street in 2003.
Their trial is under way in Morristown this week.
Lauren Ellis was inline-skating down her street on a fall afternoon when she collided with an adult neighbor, a prominent fertility doctor, who was bicycling.
Dr. Alexander Dlugi, now 54, sued the child, claiming she was negligent and caused the collision by reacting unreasonably when he approached her from behind on Sugar Maple Row, shouted "watch out" and rang his bicycle bell.
This week, the seven-member jury in the civil trial pitting the endocrinologist against Ellis, now a 15-year-old freshman at West Morris-Mendham High School, heard testimony from the teenager and Dlugi, and opinions from an accident-reconstruction specialist.
The accident expert said on Wednesday Dlugi could have avoided the collision by simply riding around the skater.
Doctor's case
Dlugi was an owner of the Bedminster-based Center for Reproductive Endocrinology at the time of the accident, and remains a fertility specialist and part-owner of the center. He broke his collarbone when he tumbled from his bike. His attorney, Thomas Jardim, said the doctor's injury did not heal properly or quickly, so he underwent surgery in February 2004, and missed a significant amount of work and income.
The doctor has difficulty sleeping well, has lost mobility in his right shoulder and enjoyment of sports he used to excel at, including biking, swimming and tennis, Jardim said.
Ellis was bruised when the collision knocked her to the ground, but her parents, Jon and Janet Ellis, did not file a counter-suit.
"It may seem like an odd thing," Jardim said, of the lawsuit against the child. "But people are responsible for their actions." He said the law recognizes that minors over the age of 7 are presumed responsible for their actions, as adults are.
A defense witness
For Wednesday's testimony from John Desch, the president of an accident-reconstruction firm based in Riverdale, diagrams, photographs, an easel and ruler were used for an analysis of the encounter between the exercising neighbors on Oct. 19, 2003. Desch, who was called as a witness by Ellis' attorney, Joe Accardi, concluded that the girl did not do anything wrong, under the circumstances.
The girl was skating, generally on the right side of Sugar Maple Row, and Dlugi had passed her once on his first bicycle loop around the neighborhood. Ellis stopped skating and stepped to the curb when she noticed two approaching vehicles. She stepped back into the road -- with Dlugi a distance behind her on his bicycle -- and resumed skating. Then Dlugi decided to overtake and pass the girl on the road, Desch said.
Wrong move to left
Dlugi, who was traveling at no more than 8 mph, rang his bell and called out as he neared her. Hearing the noises, the girl turned around to see Dlugi waving at her and drawing near, and she tried to get out of his way but actually moved into his path and they collided, Desch explained.
"She's startled by the presence of the bicyclist. She takes evasive action to avoid an impending collision and moved further to the left," Desch said. "I don't find any fault with her actions at all."
He opined further that Dlugi should have fully braked, or maintained better control of his bicycle, and could have avoided the entanglement with the skater by riding around her in silence.
Jardim, the doctor's lawyer, sought to discredit Desch's opinions by noting he never investigated a collision between a bicyclist and a skater, and misidentified on his diagram the actual point of their crash. But Desch stuck fast to his opinion that the girl, ahead of the doctor on the same side of the road, had more rights than Dlugi did to her position on the street.
The trial before Superior Court Judge W. Hunt Dumont resumes today with testimony from medical doctors. Closing arguments are set for Monday.

Peggy Wright can be reached at (973) 267-1142 or pwright@....

A$$#()13 DOC. Mon Mar 05, 2007 7:40 pm
Somebody give me his name and his picture so I can write his name in my death note. I'd be glad to have his guts ripped apart 24 min. before his death. Any suggestions as to how he is to die will be accepted and carried out whenever appropriate. Neutral
This is sad... Mon Mar 05, 2007 4:05 pm
This guy should be shot, to be honest with ya...its to bad the fall didn't cause any permanent damage. This poor little girl probably thinks the whole world is a terrible place afetr all this, and rightly so...I mean is this what those men and women overseas are fighting for? For some arrogant, most likely LOADED doctor to sue a 15 year old child over a bicyling ACCIDENT??? oh the poor doctor is worried about the money he lost while recuperating..WAH WAH! the guy is a friggin fertitlity expert, which translated to the lay person means the guy has more money than most of us...on the other hand, after this news, if i were to be driving my car along the road and a 3 year old runs into the street and I swerve to avoid hitting him and I drive right into a tree, can i sue the 3 year old and make him "responsible for his actions"???? maybe i should call this bottom feeding lawyer...if you may be wondering why the rest of the world hates our guts, look no further than the picture of this smug little man who calls himself a doctor...i know i wouldn't want this slime ball anywhere near me
Doctor Sues Girl, 11, over inline-skating collision Mon Mar 05, 2007 1:50 pm
Since the so-called "doctor" was operating a street vehicle and approaching the young girl, 11 years old at the time, from behind, it was he that was under the total and full obligation to take the appropriate steps of defensive, not offensive operation of his vehicle in avoiding the collision. The circumstances of the accident point to a premediated act on the "doctor's" part causing injury, pain, and suffering to the child. I hope the jury finds the "doctor" guilty and the judge awards the girl and her family double what the "doctor" requested in his original suit, with a comparable and equal amount to be paid by his lawyer, as well, to the girl and her family for taking up and bringing such a frivolous suit to the court.
Reader Comment Sun Mar 04, 2007 9:40 am
Ahhhh this warms my heart - The good 'ol US of A the land of promise , democracy and litigation.Get a life people & start sorting out the things that REALLY matter.... Like the fine men & women in Iraq fighting a war that's not theirs and one that you are not going to win.Vietnam Mk II anyone?
All this pr1ck is concerned about is bleeding dry an 11 year old kid.
Well done big man..... Here's hoping you choke on your foi gras. Evil or Very Mad
Reader Comment Sun Mar 04, 2007 8:48 am
Your feelings are guided by the personal images. If the skater had been a 15 year old male skinhead wearing a black leather jacket and the bicyclist had been an 11 year old girl, you would criticize the skater for moving to the left suddenly and crashing into the bicyclist who obviously did nothing wrong. This is not about "failing to operate a bicycle properly". It is about riding on rollerblades in the street and failing to be careful when moving suddenly to the left which is even further out into traffic. The kid's parents are responsible for letting her rollerblade in the street where it is not safe.
This is Sad Sat Mar 03, 2007 1:16 am
This is a sad world we live in. Someone riding a bike who takes the inherent risk of falling crashes into a little girl then tries to sue her. You are responsible for people in front of you. If anything, she should sue him. But can you believe this? A rich doctor suing a little girl! It is his own stupidity that got him knocked off his bike. No one wants to take responsibility anymore. We as a society are doomed because of pieces of garbage like this!

It is weird how accidents are now cause for litigious matters. The only ones who are going to benefit from this .... the lawyers.

Sad Sad Sad man


We won't tell. Get more on shows you hate to love
(and love to hate): Yahoo! TV's Guilty Pleasures list.

Wed Mar 7, 2007 8:21 am

pulsecolo
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #1095 of 1119 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

Isn't it interesting how the medical profession has come up with this novel idea of disclosure and apology. Sadly, when one of the those in the profession...
pulsecolo
Offline Send Email
Mar 7, 2007
8:21 am
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help