Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
medicalerrors-solutions · medical errors & solutions, support
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Want to share photos of your group with the world? Add a group photo to Flickr.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
New FDA Craziness   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #1088 of 1119 |

New FDA Craziness

 
 
An analysis by the Institute of Medicine found that the federal system for approving and regulating drugs has serious problems, and dramatic changes are required to fix them.
The report fixed the blame on the FDA, Congress, and the pharmaceutical industry, and called on all of them to share responsibility in implementing solutions.
Several of the suggested changes are ones that have been requested for many years by drug safety advocates.
Many of the recommendations would require Congressional approval to enact, including such changes as:
  • FDA commissioners would serve a single six-year term
  • Newly approved drugs would include black triangles on their labels, warning consumers their safety was still in question
  • New drugs would only be approved for five years, at which point the FDA would review their safety
  • A ban on advertising would be in effect while drugs remain on this probationary period
The panel also recommended that a substantial majority of FDA advisory panel members not have industry ties, and suggested that manufacturers should be required to produce the outcomes of all studies, not just those published in medical journals. Studies that show positive results for a drug are more likely to be published.
ABC News September 22, 2006
Washington Post September 23, 2006
Institute of Medicine September 22, 2006

New FDA Craziness

 
An analysis by the Institute of Medicine found that the federal system for approving and regulating drugs has serious problems, and dramatic changes are required to fix them
Dr. Mercola's Comment:
In an uncanny bit of timing, this scathing Institute of Medicine report came out the same day I posted news about America's dismal health care scorecard.
With the current Congressional session nearly over, there's no hope that any of these reforms will be considered before next year, when federal legislators will reconsider the existing agreement with the multi-national drug companies, under which they pay millions to speed up reviews of new drugs.
Under current law, those fees cannot be diverted to shore up the agency's woefully underfunded safety division.
Of course, the drug cartel's minister of propaganda, Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, would have you believe any notion the FDA is seriously compromised is a big mistake.
They oppose the mandatory registration of clinical trials, arguing that this would force companies to reveal trade secrets, and they also oppose any restrictions on advertising. It's fairly easy to see where they stand on the issue of making money versus ensuring patient safety.
However, the real mistake would be trusting the FDA's opinions about drug safety, especially considering it can't even assess its own success or failure, according to Sen. Charles Grassley (R-Iowa).
We'll have to wait and see if these recommendations cause any actual changes. The drug companies significantly influence American political leaders that are responsible for FDA policies and funding. From 1998 to 2005, drug and chemical corporations spent $758 million on lobbying politicians.
In the 2004 elections alone, nearly $1 million was contributed to President Bush, $500,000 to his opponent John Kerry, and over $100,000 was contributed to approximately 18 members of Congress.
The drug and chemical industries employ over 1,200 full-time lobbyists, including 40 former members of Congress. The drug and chemical corporate lobbyists are extremely successful at what they do, which puts the FDA at the mercy of the very same chemical industry that they aim to regulate.
So, the odds are stacked against any real changes.
Don't count on the FDA. People need to take responsibility for their own health and:
  • Radically cut back on the nearly 200 pounds of sugar they eat each year
  • Stop spending 90 percent of their food money on processed foods
  • Exercise four to five times a week
  • Stop relying on drugs as Band-Aids to treat their symptoms, and demand solutions instead


Talk is cheap. Use Yahoo! Messenger to make PC-to-Phone calls. Great rates starting at 1¢/min.

Thu Oct 12, 2006 5:30 am

pulsecolo
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #1088 of 1119 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

New FDA Craziness http://www.mercola.com/2006/oct/12/new-fda-craziness.htm An analysis by the Institute of Medicine found that the federal system for approving...
pulsecolo
Offline Send Email
Oct 12, 2006
5:32 am
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help