Free-Reprint Article Written by: Will Brink
See Terms of Reprint Below.


*****************************************************************
*
* This email is being delivered directly to members of the group:
*
* med-content@yahoogroups.com
*
*****************************************************************


We have moved our TERMS OF REPRINT to the end of the article.
Be certain to read our TERMS OF REPRINT and honor our TERMS
OF REPRINT when you use this article. Thank you.

This article has been distributed by:
http://Article-Distribution.com

Helpful Link:
The Digital Millennium Copyright Act - Overview
http://www.gseis.ucla.edu/iclp/dmca1.htm

---------------------------------------------------------------------

Article Title:
==============
The "Proprietary Blend" Nutritional Supplement

Article Description:
====================
In a nut shell, I went onto cover each of these common marketing
terms that are used to sell supplements to unwitting consumers
and explained each in detail as to what I view as their common
misuse within the market place.


Additional Article Information:
===============================
1088 Words; formatted to 65 Characters per Line
Distribution Date and Time: Fri Feb 10 04:37:43 EST 2006

Written By: Will Brink
Copyright: 2006
Contact Email: mailto:articles@...

Article URL:
http://thePhantomWriters.com/free_content/d/b/proprietary-blend-shell-game.shtml

For more free-reprint articles by this Author, please visit:
http://thePhantomWriters.com/free_content/d/index.shtml#Will_Brink



---------------------------------------------------------------------

The "Proprietary Blend" Nutritional Supplement
Copyright © 2006 Will Brink
Diet Supplements Revealed
http://aboutsupplements.com



- The Shell Game that is the "Proprietary Blend" Nutritional
Supplement

Recently I wrote an article entitled "Terms, Terms, Terms, An
Inside look to buying supplements" which can be found on the
Gurus and Guests section of my private forum. The article covered
many of the misleading marketing terms buyers have to deal with
in an attempt to make informed decisions on the supplements they
spend their hard earned money on. Some of the more potentially
misleading commonly used marketing terms I covered were:

"Clinically proven"
"Patented"
"Doctor recommended"
"All natural"
"Scientifically formulated"
"Research proven"
"Used for thousands of years"

Readers interested in understanding why the above terms can be so
misleading, can read my write-up on each of those terms.

In a nut shell, I went onto cover each of these common marketing
terms that are used to sell supplements to unwitting consumers
and explained each in detail as to what I view as their common
misuse within the market place.

However, one term I didn't cover, was "proprietary blend" which
in many cases is the most potentially misleading term of them
all, though not a term always seen in ads per se, but the side of
the bottle.

Thus, why I felt it was a separate topic to be covered at a later
date as it does not fit under the classic definition of a
commonly used marketing term found in ads. I also decided to
cover this term in a separate article as it requires much more
space dedicated to it then the other terms needed for reasons
that will be apparent shortly.

Proprietary blends are not inherently a negative for the
consumer, though they are inherently confusing for the buyer in
most cases.

A supplement that lists a "proprietary blend" on the bottle can
be there for one of two reasons:

(a) to prevent the competition from knowing exactly what ratios
and amounts of each ingredient present in the formula to prevent
the competition from copying their formula exactly (commonly
referred to as a "knock off") or

(b) to hide the fact the formula contains very little of the
active ingredients listed on the bottle in an attempt to fool
consumers.

Sadly, the latter use is far more common then the former. They
see a long list of seemingly impressive ingredients listed in the
"proprietary blend" none of which are there is amounts that will
have any effects. This is commonly referred to as "label
decoration" by industry insiders. The former use of the term is a
legitimate way for a company of a quality formula from having the
competition copy or "knock off" their formula and the latter use
of the term is to scam people.

So how does the consumer tell the difference?

They can't, or at least they can't without some research and
knowledge, which the scam artists know few people have the time
and energy to dedicate to finding the answers. Although there are
a few tips the consumer can use to decide if a product with a
"proprietary blend" is worth trying, no one, not even me, can
figure out exactly how much of each ingredient is in the blend or
in what ratio of each is contained within the formula, hence why
the honest and not-so-honest companies employ "proprietary
blends" so often.

Thus, we have something of a conundrum here and conflict between
a company making a quality formula attempting to protect that
formula from other companies vs. the company simply looking to
baffle buyers with BS.

There are at least some basic tips or food for thought here
regarding this problem. A formula that contains say 10
ingredients in a "proprietary blend" is by no means defacto
superior then one with three ingredients in it. It's the dose
that matters. Clearly, it's better to have higher amounts of
ingredients that will have some effects vs. a long list of
ingredients in doses too low to have any effects.

Some times it helps to look at both what's in the blend and how
much of the blend actually exists. As an example, if say the
blend is 300mg total and contains ten ingredients, that's only
30mg per ingredient, assuming (and you know what they say about
assuming!) that each is found in equal amounts. Clearly, for most
compounds out there, 30mg wont do jack sh*&.

On the other hand, if say the blend is 3000mg (3 grams) and
contains three or four ingredients, there is at least a better
chance that the formula contains enough of each (and remember, we
can't tell how much of each is in there as that information is
"proprietary") to have some effects you are looking for such as
an increase in strength, or a decrease in bodyfat, etc.

Unfortunately, the above examples are so vague as to be close to
worthless as it's easy enough to formulate a 3000mg blend where
all the ingredients are worthless to begin with or a 300mg blend
that contains compounds that only require small doses to have an
effect and or can be toxic at higher doses.

For example, the mineral zinc tends to be no more then 30mg in
most formulas and no more is needed or recommended. Much of this
comes down to the consumer knowing what the various ingredients
are and how they work (to decide if they are even worth using in
the first place) then deciding if said blend appears to at least
contain a dose that would have the desired effects, which just
brings us back to my prior comment: most people have neither the
time or inclination to research all that info just to decide if
they want to use a product and thus the many "proprietary blends"
on the market that are no more then a long list of under-dosed
ingredients.

Wish I could be of more help giving specific advice to readers of
this here article as to what makes a good blend and what
constitutes a poorly made blend, but the above advice is the best
I can do under the circumstances. Although a "proprietary blend"
is not by default a negative to the consumer, it is by all means
the poster child for the well-known Latin term Caveat emptor
which translates into English as "let the buyer beware".


See Will's ebooks online here:

Muscle Building Nutrition
http://musclebuildingnutrition.com
A complete guide bodybuilding supplements and eating to gain
lean muscle

Diet Supplements Revealed
http://aboutsupplements.com
A review of diet supplements and guide to eating for maximum
fat loss



---------------------------------------------------------------------
Will Brink writes for numerous health, fitness, medical, and
bodybuilding publications. His articles can be found in Life
Extension Magazine, Muscle n Fitness, Inside Karate, Exercise
For Men Only, Oxygen, Women's World, The Townsend Letter For
Doctors and many more. His website is http://www.brinkzone.com


--- END ARTICLE ---



.....................................

TERMS OF REPRINT - Publication Rules
(Last Updated: April 7, 2005)

Our TERMS OF REPRINT are fully enforcable under the terms of:

The Digital Millennium Copyright Act
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c105:H.R.2281.ENR:

.....................................

*** Digital Reprint Rights ***

* If you publish this article in a website/forum/blog,
You Must Set All URL's or Mailto Addresses in the body
of the article AND in the Author's Resource Box as
Hyperlinks (clickable links).

* Links must remain in the form that we published them.
Clean links should point to the Author's links without
redirects having been inserted into the copy.

* You are not allowed to Change or Delete any Words or
Links in the Article or Resource Box. Paragraph breaks
must be retained with articles. You can change where
the paragraph breaks fall, but you cannot eliminate all
paragraph breaks as some have chosen to do.

* Email Distribution of this article Must be done through
Opt-in Email Only. No Unsolicited Commercial Email.


* You Are Allowed to format the layout of the article for
proper display of the article in your website or in your
ezine, so long as you can maintain the author's interests
within the article.


*** Author Notification ***

We ask that you notify the author of publication of his
or her work. Will Brink can be reached at:
articles@...


*** Print Publication Reprint Rights ***

If you desire to publish this article in a PRINT
publication, you must contact the author directly
for Print Permission at:
mailto:articles@...

.....................................

If you need help converting this text article for proper
hyperlinked placement in your webpage, please use this
free tool: http://thephantomwriters.com/link-builder.pl



=====================================================================

ABOUT THIS ARTICLE SUBMISSION

http://thePhantomWriters.com is a paid article distribution
service. thePhantomWriters.com and Article-Distribution.com
are owned and operated by Bill Platt of Enid, Oklahoma USA.

The content of this article is solely the property
and opinion of its author, Will Brink
http://aboutsupplements.com



---------------------------------------------------------------------
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
---------------------------------------------------------------------