Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
med-content · Content for the Medical Professional
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Real people. Real stories. See how Yahoo! Groups impacts members worldwide.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
The “Greatest” Leaders Are Often The Worst Leaders   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #24 of 545 |
Free-Reprint Article Written by: Brent Filson
See Terms of Reprint Below.


*****************************************************************
*
* This email is being delivered directly to members of the group:
*
* med-content@yahoogroups.com
*
*****************************************************************



Article Title: The “Greatest” Leaders Are Often The Worst Leaders
Article Author: Brent Filson
Article Copyright: 2004

Article URL:

http://thePhantomWriters.com/free_content/d/f/the-greatest-and-worst-leaders.sht\
ml


Article Autoresponder:
mailto:the-greatest-and-worst-leaders@...

Author Contact Email:
mailto:brent@...

Formatted to 65 Characters per Line
Word Count: 860 words



-----------------------------------------------------------------

This article was written by Brent Filson.

The only role of http://thePhantomWriters.com and
http://Article-Distribution.com is in the actual
distribution of this article to you.

At TPW, we are providing an additional free tool for
webmasters who reprint the articles we distribute. If your
software does not automatically hyperlink the URL's in your
site copy, please use our Text-to-Hyperlink Conversion Tool
to convert all URL's and Mailto addresses to the required
hyperlinked format:

http://thephantomwriters.com/link-builder.pl

-----------------------------------------------------------------

TERMS OF REPRINT - Publication Rules

This is a Free-Reprint article. The only requirements for
publishing this article are:

* You must leave the article and resource box unedited. You are
not allowed to change our recommendations, nor are you allowed
to change the context of the article.

* You may not use this article in UCE (Unsolicited Commercial Email).
Email distribution of this article MUST be opt-in email only.

* We ask that you forward a copy of the ezine or newsletter
that contains the article inside to the author at:
mailto:brent@...

* If you post this article on a website, you MUST set any URL's
or Mailto addresses in the body of the article and most
especially in the Author's Resource Box as hyperlinks. We
request that you also send us a copy of the URL where you
have posted this article.

We are providing free Text-to-Hyperlink Conversion Tool for
webmasters who need an easy way to convert the plain text in
this article to hyperlinks where required, for the purpose of
meeting our hyperlink requirements:

http://thephantomwriters.com/link-builder.pl


If you find any of the rules to be unsavory or unacceptable, please
do not publish this article. While we are happy to make the content
available to you for your own use, we must insist on having our rules
and *Terms of Reprint* honored in full.


-----------------------------------------------------------------

The “Greatest” Leaders Are Often The Worst Leaders
Copyright © 2004 Brent Filson
The Filson Leadership Group, Inc.
http://www.actionleadership.com/



It's a common occurrence, a CEO leads a company to record
earnings, retires and in months, those once high-flying earnings
are dropping like shot ducks.

Observers blame the new leadership team. But most likely
the observers are wrong. It's not just the new leaders who are
screwing up. Instead, it was most likely the former CEO. Yes,
the former, supposedly great CEO. Look to him for what went
wrong — and what went wrong provides lessons for leaders at all
levels.

The reasons are clear but seldom recognized. They get
back to the raison d' etre of leadership — which is not the
performance of the individual leader but the improved results of
those being led. The problems lie in the definition of results.
For when results are defined narrowly, i.e. in strict terms of
share, margin, shareholder value, profits, organizations lose
their elasticity.

And the quality of organizational elasticity is linked to
its culture of leadership, leadership with a broader vision of
results, encompassing the necessity to hire and develop people
who lead others to get results.

So when decline follows the departure of great leaders,
the safe bet is that those "great" leaders haven't hired and
developed leaders — and so really weren't great at all, no
matter what results they got. In fact, they were quite poor.

To paraphrase Vince Lombardi on winning, getting good
leaders for your team isn't everything, it's the only thing.
The moment that you decide to hire, that very moment, is the
living, breathing future of your organization.

A curious chemistry takes place in the hiring process.
We don't just reach outward, we also reach inward. In hiring
leaders, we invariably hire ourselves — our strengths and
weaknesses. So the hand we reach out to shake is not just the
other person's hand, it's our hand. Hire to our strengths, we
hire strong leaders. Hire to our weaknesses, we hire weak
leaders.

I know a brilliant, young executive in a multimillion
dollar manufacturing company whose ambition to become CEO of
that company may founder on his maddening propensity to hire
leaders who may be good but who are none-the-less not the
very best.

That's because the leaders he hires must have what is an
unstated but at the same time real skill: the ability to curry
his favor. Those leaders are ostensibly qualified. But they
are often not the very best of the pool because they come
equipped with that extraneous skill.

Since results on his teams are also defined as the care and
feeding of his ego, that executive is hiring to his weaknesses,
so he continually makes what may ultimately turn out to be
garbage-in-garbage-out hiring decisions that can ultimately
wreck his ambitions.

On the other hand, I know another young executive, not
nearly as brilliant, but whose hiring dictum may very well get
him farther along in life.

The dictum is: Hire leaders who can not only do well in
this position but in the next position and maybe even the
position beyond that.

In other words, he hires to his strengths, his inner sense
of self-confidence, which allows him to surround himself with
people who are smarter and in some ways more capable than he —
and so is creating a rising tide of action and results that
will further his career in powerful ways.

As Steven Jobs said, "I don't hire people to tell them
what to do but to tell me what to do."

Yet hiring people who are capable of supplanting you isn't
enough. Do more. Actively develop the knowledge, skills and
careers of those leaders to give them the best possible chance
of supplanting you.

An epitaph on a 1680 New England gravestone speaks to this:

What I gave, I have.
What I spent, I had.
What I left, I lost.
By not giving it.

That can be an epitaph for failed leaders. By not giving
to your leaders, not developing their skills and careers, you
lose them, lose the opportunity to have their riches enrich
you.

Nobody is a success unless others want them to be. And
when you have a passionate desire for their success, for helping
them improve and achieve their goals, when they know that
working on your team will be a defining experience of their
career — then you will have people who want like hell for you
to be a success.

The decline following the departure of "great" leaders
indicates that those leaders were most likely control-monsters,
commanders not convincers, great at getting jobs done
themselves but not challenging others to do them.

And when those others are ignored, they become inept.

So let's take an additional yardstick to our leaders and
measure their total value, both when they're there and after
they have left. Link that value to deferred compensation,
bonuses, stock options for executives and to partially-delayed
evaluations for middle managers and supervisors — or whatever.

When leaders define their performance beyond their tenure,
they will most likely pay more attention to those two factors
that are absolutely necessary for any organization's continued
well-being: getting and developing exceptional leaders.

=============================
2004 © The Filson Leadership Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
=============================



-----------------------------------------------------------------
The author of 23 books, Brent Filson’s recent books are, THE
LEADERSHIP TALK: THE GREATEST LEADERSHIP TOOL and 101 WAYS TO
GIVE GREAT LEADERSHIP TALKS. He is founder and president of The
Filson Leadership Group, Inc. – and has worked with thousands of
leaders worldwide during the past 20 years helping them achieve
sizable increases in hard, measured results. Sign up for his
free leadership ezine and get a free guide, “49 Ways To Turn
Action Into Results,” at http://www.actionleadership.com




--- END ARTICLE ---


Distribution Date and Time: Fri Dec 10 04:10:51 EST 2004


For more articles by this author, please visit:

http://thePhantomWriters.com/free_content/d/index.shtml#Brent_Filson







Fri Dec 10, 2004 9:10 am

article_dist...
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #24 of 545 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

Free-Reprint Article Written by: Brent Filson See Terms of Reprint Below. ***************************************************************** * * This email...
Brent Filson
article_dist...
Offline Send Email
Dec 10, 2004
9:11 am
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help