I understand that Magnotherapy it does work.  It has help me a lot
with ache and pains.  I even think it helps me with sleeping.

"Rare Eye Disease of Infant Resolved in 3 weeks with Biomagnet Therapy"

Holicong, PA. February 5, 2008: The following is a Foundation for Magnetic
Science, BiomagScience study about a static magnetic field therapy that
helped overcome the serious disease of Strabismus and Nystagmus in an
infant. The conditions of Strabismus and/or Nystagmus are sometimes referred
to as a fault in the neural system including the cerebellovestibular,
optokinetic and pursuit mechanisms that normally hold the eyes or fixation
(focus) steady. Strabismus is a crossing of the eye and Nystagmus means the
eyes make involuntary repetitive, rhythmic jerking and/or rolling
oscillations and are not steady or focused. Manifest Nystagmus is the type
of motion that never stops and is considered clinical blindness because
focus is never achieved; there is no known therapy that stops or heals the
condition.

BiomagScience Therapy Study: When initially viewing the 3 month old male
infant, the child's eyes could not focus, but were in a constant state of
rolling and rhythmically, rapidly jerking from side to side with no focus on
anything - appearing to be manifest - never resting. After 3 weeks of
therapy, the condition stopped and the child was able to focus. It has been
suggested and is being followed that the supportive negative electromotive
energy be continued in lighter therapy application on the lower
cerebellovestibular system (back of the upper neck) until full adult
formation in teens.

  A BiomagScience Power Wafer was initially applied as therapy to the upper
center of the Frontal Bone to support an increased Negative Zeta potential
in the neurotransmitter fluid to create a shortening (downspin - bringing
together electromotively] between growing synaptic connections to support
formative correctional growth of the optic mechanisms. Once the basic
response had been achieved (3 weeks in this case), the BioMagnet was
relocated to the lower CVS to continue the therapy due to the possibility of
the child pulling it off. The following statement is by the mother of the
male infant.

"Evan was about two months old when I noticed that there was something wrong
with his eyes. He was having trouble looking at objects and staying focus
and looking straight into my face. His eyes would move uncontrollably in
circular motion and rapidly up and down and side to side. It was scary to
see the whites of his eyes rolled in circular motion as if he was in some
kind of a trance or possessive state. We consulted with three different
specialists in the field of Pediatric Ophthalmology and Neuro-Ophthalmology.
Evan was diagnosed of having strabismus and nystagmus. He was only three
months old at the time of the exam and the doctors advised us to wait until
Evan was at least six months old to proceed with further testing and
treatments. Three months was too long of a wait and I want the problem
corrected as soon as possible. I needed an alternative answer and found
BiomagScience.

Peter Kulish, Senior Science Advisor, BiomagScience, directed a BioMagnet
Power Wafer be taped on Evan's forehead green, negative side down
continuously for at least 3 weeks. After 3 weeks, we noticed a huge
difference in Evan's eyes and vision. He no longer has any physical signs of
involuntary and uncoordinated eye movements. The BioMagnet did an amazing
job and it really worked for Evan. He has focus and can follow objects from
a distance and can look straight into my eyes when I converse with him. His
eyes are stable and no longer wander or bounce up and down or move from side
to side and roll in circular motion. I am very happy and relieved to see
that his eyes are functioning normally.







Evan is now 5 months old and as far as we can see there are NO visible signs
of strabismus or nystagmus. Evan still wears the BioMagnet but since he is
able to pull the BioMagnet off his forehead, it was moved and taped to the
back of his neck (green, negative side down). We will continue to follow-up
for Evan's 6 months visit with the Pediatric Neuro-Ophthalmology next month.




Thanks you for your help! We are grateful for your recommendations, concerns
and support for Evan. Thank you for your invention of BiomagScience!"

S. K., North Wales, PA 01/29/08

Contact:

Tiffany Kuoch, Public Relations

BiomagScience

215-862-6777

www.BioMagScience.com

office@...





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Also study the magnesium potassium pump and the influence of the negative
energy on stuck cells. The only monopole  has been some speculation on is
the reverb on Zero point energy - otherwise, the technique is to use the
single pole therapy to induce an elevation of the proper charges. see
http://www.biomagscience.com/bia_cellular_voltage_testing_by_fms  for
voltage health of cells - Negative voltage that it. No doubt "For every
positive".  If you are a plant, throw the Positive on. If you are an animal,
use the negative.



Peter



From: magnotherapy@yahoogroups.com [mailto:magnotherapy@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of phunkc@...
Sent: Sunday, December 16, 2007 8:51 AM
To: magnotherapy@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [magnotherapy] Torn Cartilage in Knee





Hello John,

First of all I am a researcher and a scientist. My field is applied
biophysics. The is NO such thing as a unipole magnet. Trust me on that one.
A unipole
anything does NOT exist in this universe. Even the atom itself is matter by
the virtue of both positive and negative charges. All molecules align and
attract to become visible objects by virtue of their dipolar charges.

In the human body the negative pole of any magnet changes the spin of the
positive sodium and potassium ions...pain is stopped by magnetics because
of:
1. Coulombs law
2. Lorentz force effect
3.Faraday's law

Do also study the sodium/potassium pump and Wall and Melzack's gate control
theory.

Magnetics are a VERY powerful healing modality. I cannot sit by and allow
vendors of magnetic products continue to make magnetics into 'snake oil'
because they don't understand the physics behind them. Please all...learn
your
science and you will be able to sell your products.

Knowledge is power...bull shit is bull shit.

To answer your question on the Weintraub study. The insoles were Nikken. If
this group allows attachments I will send the entire study as a pdf
attachment.

Peace, love and a kinder answer,
Liz

NOTICE TO RECIPIENT: THIS E-MAIL IS MEANT FOR ONLY THE INTENDED RECIPIENT OF

THE TRANSMISSION, AND MAY BE A COMMUNICATION PRIVILEGED BY LAW. ANY REVIEW,
USE, DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION, OR COPYING OF THIS E-MAIL IS STRICTLY
PROHIBITED. IF YOU RECEIVED THIS E-MAIL IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY ME
IMMEDIATELY OF
THE ERROR BY RETURN E-MAIL AND PLEASE DELETE THIS MESSAGE FROM YOUR SYSTEM.
THANK YOU IN ADVANCE FOR YOUR COOPERATION.

**************************************See AOL's top rated recipes
(http://food.aol.com/top-rated-recipes?NCID=aoltop00030000000004)

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

I have just recieved a rather alarming mail from Dr. Slesin, the
editor of the Microwave news, which refers to a supression of the
results from the EU-funded INTERPHONE project, which was allotted
several million Euros under framework program 6, a public research
program.

I have posted several times about the results of previous INTERPHONE
projects in this forum, from Denmark, Sweden, and other countries, but
there apparently are completet projects, which are not published!

If this is true, this is a scandal indeed and I will take it up in the
Danish press, with the Danish government officials, and with
colleagues in other EU countries. In the meantime, while I am
researching the matter, I would appreciate your comments and
suggestions.

Scott Hill
frontier sciences group
Copenhagen

Wed, 30 Jan 2008 15:14:52 -0500
Emne: Cell Phones and Tumors: Set Interphone Free
Fra: "Louis Slesin, Microwave News" <info@...
<http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/bioelectromagnetics/post?postID=7sOZ\
C-mogI_EHmYOrccJGecXD0hwf6e_FATT2nec8fc1u6nyDM9putsCgyfzT35CkxIoVALFjg1B\
U-OK> >
Til: "Scott Hill" <frontiersciences@...
<http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/bioelectromagnetics/post?postID=Kuus\
UzS7ASrHhatcZwbeKA8giugwkL53bgDWkoKVQZgC3jMfJiXBARrAO2k9g8dSlVJKIodhRxXj\
iGSl5YrVwAeNbCI> >

Dear Colleagues:

It¹s time to end the deadlock. It¹s time to release the results of
the
Interphone project, the largest and most expensive cell phone
epidemiological study ever attempted.

Microwave News has learned that a completed draft of the results was
completed TWO YEARS AGO. Yet, the paper has not yet been published and
the
participants refuse to discuss what they found.

Many observers believe that the Interphone study points to a long-term
risk
of developing tumors. But we will not know for sure until the results
are
made public.

Any further delay would be close to scandalous.

Read the complete story on our Web site:
http://www.microwavenews.com <http://www.microwavenews.com/>

Best,
Louis Slesin


__________________________________________________________
Louis Slesin, PhD
Editor, Microwave News
A Report on Non-Ionizing Radiation
Phone: +1 (212) 517-2800; Fax: +1 (212) 734-0316
E-mail: <mwn@...
<http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/bioelectromagnetics/post?postID=OSp3\
pwCeNsLA6gVJLtOKU7vP_gq50Aw1qOXPHjUfsU8-kiCgMJ8x0Qt3PAHS8tCroKZk> >
Internet: <http://www.microwavenews.com <http://www.microwavenews.com/>
>
Mail: 155 East 77th Street, Suite 3D
New York, NY 10075, U.S.A.






[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

It seems to be on the uprise lately.  In media everywhere how magnets
can releive the urge to smoke.

I used it quite successfully.

http://stopsmokingnow.tripod.com

Not a bad deal for less than $15!

Wishing you the best!

I set up a Facebook profile with my pictures, videos and events and I want to
add you as a friend so you can see it. First, you need to join Facebook! Once
you join, you can also create your own profile.

Thanks,
Su

Here's the link:
http://www.facebook.com/p.php?i=605640854&k=3YC36Z52P2TF6DM1PCY2Q&r&v=2

___________________
This e-mail may contain promotional materials. If you do not wish to receive
future commercial mailings from Facebook, please click on the link below.
Facebook's offices are located at 156 University Ave., Palo Alto, CA 94301.
http://www.facebook.com/o.php?u=1069011670&k=e75c0f



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Yes John I am E Colorio [nee Bauer]

Thanks for your list! BTW...I know Agatha, although we have  not been in
touch for a number of years now. We both have been very busy!  I will contact
her
after the holidays to catch up.

Peace, love and a kinder  answer,
Liz









NOTICE TO RECIPIENT: THIS E-MAIL IS MEANT FOR ONLY  THE INTENDED RECIPIENT OF
THE TRANSMISSION, AND MAY BE A COMMUNICATION  PRIVILEGED BY LAW. ANY REVIEW,
USE, DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION, OR  COPYING OF THIS E-MAIL IS STRICTLY
PROHIBITED. IF YOU RECEIVED THIS E-MAIL  IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY ME IMMEDIATELY
OF
THE ERROR BY RETURN E-MAIL AND  PLEASE DELETE THIS MESSAGE FROM YOUR SYSTEM.
THANK YOU IN ADVANCE FOR YOUR  COOPERATION.



**************************************See AOL's top rated recipes
(http://food.aol.com/top-rated-recipes?NCID=aoltop00030000000004)


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

In a message dated 17/12/2007 10:33:13 GMT Standard Time, phunkc@...
writes:

John  here is a short list of published 'JOURNAL" articles on  the benefits
of
magnetic fields.



Thanks for that, I take it you are the Colorio EB who did all the
presentations to the orthopaedic department.

Here is Agatha Colbert's list from the review.

     1.  Markov MS, Pilla AA. Weak static magnetic field  modulation of myosin
phosphorylation in a cell-free preparation: calcium  dependence.
Bioelectrochem Bioenerg ( 1997;) 43:: 233–8._[CrossRef]_
(http://ecam.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/external_ref?access_num=10.1016/S0302-4598(9\
6)02226-X&link_type=DOI)
_[ISI]_
(http://ecam.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/external_ref?access_num=A1997YD72300007&link\
_type=ISI)
     1.  McKay JC, Prato FS, Thomas AW. A literature review: the  effects of
magnetic field exposure on blood flow and blood vessels in the
microvasculature. Bioelectromagnetics ( 2007;) 28:: 81–98._[CrossRef]_
(http://ecam.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/external_ref?access_num=10.1002/bem.20284&li\
nk_type=DOI) _[ISI]_
(http://ecam.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/external_ref?access_num=000243579400001&li
nk_type=ISI) _[Medline]_
(http://ecam.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/external_ref?access_num=17004242&link_type=M\
ED)
     1.  Taniguchi N, Kanai S, Kawamoto M, Endo H,  Higashino H. Study on
application of static magnetic field for adjuvant  arthritis rats. Evid Based
Complement Alternat Med ( 2004;) 1::  187–91._[Abstract/Free Full Text]_
(http://ecam.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/ijlink?linkType=ABST&journalCode=ecam&resid=\
1/2/187)

     1.  Xu S, Tomita N, Ikeuchi K, Ikada Y. Recovery of  small-sized blood
vessels in ischemic bone under static magnetic field.  Evid Based Complement
Alternat Med ( 2007;) 4:: 59–63._[Abstract/Free Full Text]_
(http://ecam.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/ijlink?linkType=ABST&journalCode=ecam&resid=\
4/1/59)
     1.  Morris CE, Skalak TC. Chronic static magnetic  field exposure alters
microvessel enlargement resulting from surgical  intervention. J Appl Physiol
( 2007;) 103:: 629–36._[Abstract/Free Full Text]_
(http://ecam.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/ijlink?linkType=ABST&journalCode=jap&resid=1\
03/2/629)
     1.  Alfano AP, Taylor AG, Foresman PA, Dunkl PR,  McConnell GG, Conaway
MR, et al. Static magnetic fields for treatment of  fibromyalgia: a randomized
controlled trial. J Alternat Complement Med  ( 2001;) 7:: 53–64._[ISI]_
(http://ecam.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/external_ref?access_num=000167132800009&link\
_
type=ISI) _[Medline]_
(http://ecam.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/external_ref?access_num=11246937&link_type=M\
ED)
     1.  Colbert A. Carpal Tunnel Syndrome and Static  Magnetic Field Therapy:
CRISP database, 2006–2009.
_http://crisp.cit.nih.gov/crisp/crisp_query.generate_screen_
(http://crisp.cit.nih.gov/crisp/crisp_query.generate_screen) .
     1.  Ratterman R, Secrest J, Norwood B, Ch’ien AP.  Magnet therapy: what's
the attraction? J Am Acad Nurse Pract ( 2002;)  14:: 347–53._[CrossRef]_
(http://ecam.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/external_ref?access_num=10.1111/j.1745-7599.\
200
2.tb00135.x&link_type=DOI) _[Medline]_
(http://ecam.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/external_ref?access_num=12242851&link_type=M\
ED)
     1.  Eccles NK. A critical review of randomized  controlled trials of
static magnets for pain relief. J Alternat Complement  Med ( 2005;) 11:: 495–
509._[CrossRef]_
(http://ecam.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/external_ref?access_num=10.1089/acm.2005.11.\
495&link_type=DOI) _[ISI]_
(http://ecam.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/external_ref?access_num=000230284100021&link\
_type=ISI) _[Medline]_
(http://ecam.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/external_ref?access_num=15992236&link_type=M\
ED)
     1.  Wasiak J, Anderson JN. Do magnets alleviate  chronic low-back pain?
Med J Aust ( 2001;) 174:: 659._[ISI]_
(http://ecam.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/external_ref?access_num=000169421300015&link\
_type=ISI) _[Medline]_
(http://ecam.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/external_ref?access_num=11480691&link_type=M\
ED)
     1.  Rosch PJ, Markov MS. Bioelectromagnetic  Medicine ( 2004;) New  York:
Marcel Dekker.
     1.  Markov M, Hazlewood C, Ericsson A. Systemic  effect: a new approach
to magnetic field therapy. Environmentalist (  2005;) 25:: 121–30._[CrossRef]_
(http://ecam.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/external_ref?access_num=10.1007/s10669-005-
4274-x&link_type=DOI)
     1.  Ashford RL, Bates AL. A pilot study into the  effectiveness of
magnetic insoles in stimulating the microcirculation in  subjects with poor
peripheral vascular supply of the lower limb. Br J  Podiatr ( 2003;) 6:: 80–4.
     1.  Barker AT, Cain MW. The claimed vasodilatory  effect of a commercial
permanent magnet foil: results of a double-blind trial.  Clin Phys Physiol
Meas ( 1985;) 6:: 261–3._[CrossRef]_
(http://ecam.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/external_ref?access_num=10.1088/0143-0815/6/\
3/008&link_type=DOI) _[ISI]_
(http://ecam.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/external_ref?access_num=A1985APT4600008&link\
_type=ISI)
_[Medline]_
(http://ecam.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/external_ref?access_num=4042555&link_type=ME\
D)
     1.  Bergman J, Robertson JR, Elia G. Effects of a  magnetic field on
pelvic floor muscle function in women with stress urinary  incontinence.
Alternat
Ther Health Med ( 2004;) 10:: 70–2.
     1.  Bondemark L, Kurol J, Larsson A. Long-term  effects of orthodontic
magnets on human buccal mucosa–a clinical, histological  and
immunohistochemical
study. Eur J Orthod ( 1998;) 20-::  211–8._[Abstract/Free Full Text]_
(http://ecam.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/ijlink?linkType=ABST&journalCode=eortho&resi\
d=20/3
/211)
     1.  Borsa PA, Ligget CL. Flexible magnets are not  effective in
decreasing pain perception and recovery time after muscle  microinjury. J Athl
Train (
1998;) 150–5.
     1.  Brown CS, Ling FW, Wan J, Pilla A. Efficacy of  static magnetic field
therapy in chronic pelvic pain: a double-blind pilot  study. Am J Obstet
Gynecol ( 2002;) 187:: 1581–7._[CrossRef]_
(http://ecam.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/external_ref?access_num=10.1067/mob.2002.128\
026&link_type=DOI) _[ISI]_
(http://ecam.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/external_ref?access_num=000180131200056&link\
_type=ISI
) _[Medline]_ (http://
ecam.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/external_ref?access_num=12501067&link_type=MED)
     1.  Carter R, Aspy CB, Mold J. The effectiveness of  magnet therapy for
treatment of wrist pain attributed to carpal tunnel  syndrome. J Fam Pract (
2002;) 51:: 38–40._[ISI]_
(http://ecam.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/external_ref?access_num=000173359400008&link\
_type=ISI) _[Medline]_
(http://ecam.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/external_ref?access_num=11927062&link_type=M\
ED)
     1.  Caselli MA, Clark N, Lazarus S, Velez Z, Venegas  L. Evaluation of
magnetic foil and PPT insoles in the treatment of heel pain.  J Am Podiatr Med
Assoc ( 1997;) 87:: 11–6._[Abstract]_
(http://ecam.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/ijlink?linkType=ABST&journalCode=jpodma&resi\
d=87/1/11)
     1.  Chaloupka EC, Kang J, Mastrangelo MA. The effect  of flexible magnets
on hand muscle strength: a randomized, double-blind study.  J Strength Cond
Res ( 2002;) 16:: 33–7._[CrossRef]_
(http://ecam.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/external_ref?access_num=10.1519/1533-4287(20\
02)016<0033:TEOFMO>2.0.CO;2&link_type=DOI)
  _[ISI]_
(http://ecam.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/external_ref?access_num=000173981600006&link\
_type=ISI) _[Medline]_
(http://ecam.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/external_ref?access_num=11834104&link_type=M\
ED)
     1.  Cody DK, Moran JD. Use of biomagnetic therapy to  encourage growth in
preterm neonates. Neonatal Netw ( 1999;) 18::  63–4._[Medline]_
(http://ecam.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/external_ref?access_num=10690099&link_type=M\
ED)
     1.  Colbert AP, Markov MS, Banerji M, Pilla AA.  Magnetic mattress pad
use in patients with fibromyalgia: a randomized  double-blind pilot study. J
Back Musculoskeletal Rehabil ( 1999;) 13::  19–31._[ISI]_
(http://ecam.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/external_ref?access_num=000085636800003&link\
_type=ISI)
     1.  Coles R, Bradley P, Donaldson I, Dingle A. A  trial of tinnitus
therapy with ear-canal magnets. Clin Otolaryngol Allied  Sci ( 1991;) 16::
371–
2._[CrossRef]_
(http://ecam.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/external_ref?access_num=10.1111/j.1365-2273.\
1991.tb00951.x&link_type=DOI) _[Medline]_
(http://ecam.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/external_ref?access_num=1934552&link_type=ME\
D)
     1.  Collacott EA, Zimmerman JT, White DW, Rindone  JP. Bipolar permanent
magnets for the treatment of chronic low back pain: a  pilot study. JAMA (
2000;) 283:: 1322–5._[Abstract/Free Full Text]_
(http://ecam.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/ijlink?linkType=ABST&journalCode=jama&resid=\
283/10/1322)
     1.  Dagan Y, Borodkin K. The ineffectiveness of  magnotherapy in a
patient with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome and  cardiovascular comorbidity.
Sleep
Breath ( 2004;) 8:: 209–12._[CrossRef]_
(http://ecam.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/external_ref?access_num=10.1055/s-2004-86089\
8&link_type=DOI) _[Medline]_
(http://ecam.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/external_ref?access_num=15611896&link_type=M\
ED)
     1.  Dexter D, Jr. Magnetic therapy is ineffective  for the treatment of
snoring and obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Wis Med J  ( 1997;) 96:: 35–
7._[Medline]_
(http://ecam.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/external_ref?access_num=9086856&link_type=ME\
D)
     1.  Eccles N. Static magnets prevent leg ulcer  recurrence: savings for
the NHS? Br J Community Nurs ( 2006;) 11::  S26,S28–30.
     1.  Eccles NK. A randomized, double-blinded,  placebo-controlled pilot
study to investigate the effectiveness of a static  magnet to relieve
dysmenorrhea. J Alternat Complement Med ( 2005;) 11::  681–7._[CrossRef]_
(http://ecam.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/external_ref?access_num=10.1089/acm.2005.11.\
681&link_type
=DOI) _[ISI]_
(http://ecam.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/external_ref?access_num=000231681300016&link\
_type=ISI) _[Medline]_ (http://ecam.oxfor
djournals.org/cgi/external_ref?access_num=16131292&link_type=MED)
     1.  Eccles NK, Hollinworth HA. pilot study to  determine whether a static
magnetic device can promote chronic leg ulcer  healing. J Wound Care ( 2005;)
14:: 64–7._[Medline]_
(http://ecam.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/external_ref?access_num=15739653&link_type=M\
ED)
     1.  Garrison DW. Effects of natural magnets on the  ability to perceive
fine touch and two-point discrimination from fingertips.  Am J Pain Manage (
2004;) 14:: 107–16.
     1.  Harlow T, Greaves C, White A, Brown L, Hart A,  Ernst E. Randomised
controlled trial of magnetic bracelets for relieving pain  in osteoarthritis of
the hip and knee. Br Med J ( 2004;) 329::  1450–4._[Abstract/Free Full Text]_
(http://ecam.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/ijlink?linkType=ABST&journalCode=bmj&resid
=329/7480/1450)
     1.  Hinman MR. Comparative effect of positive and  negative static
magnetic fields on heart rate and blood pressure in healthy  adults. Clin
Rehabil (
2002;) 16:: 669–74._[Abstract/Free Full Text]_
(http://ecam.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/ijlink?linkType=ABST&journalCode=spcre&resid\
=16/6/669)
     1.  Hinman MR, Ford J, Heyl H. Effects of static  magnets on chronic knee
pain and physical function: a double-blind study.  Alternat Ther Health Med (
2002;) 8:: 50–5.
     1.  Holcomb RR, Parker RA, Harrison MS. Biomagnetics  in the treatment of
human pain - past, present, future. Environ Med (  1991;) 8:: 24–60.
     1.  Holcomb RR, Worthington WB, McCullough BA, McLean MJ.  Static
magnetic field therapy for pain in the abdomen and genitals. Pediatr  Neurol (
2000;)
23:: 261–4._[CrossRef]_
(http://ecam.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/external_ref?access_num=10.1016/S0887-8994(0\
0)00180-6&link_type=DOI) _[ISI]_
(http://ecam.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/external_ref?access_num=000089960900011&link\
_type=ISI)
_[Medline]_
(http://ecam.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/external_ref?access_num=11033291&link_type=M\
ED)
     1.  Hong CZ, Lin JC, Bender LF, Schaeffer JN,  Meltzer RJ, Causin P.
Magnetic necklace: its therapeutic effectiveness on neck  and shoulder pain.
Arch
Phys Med Rehabil ( 1982;) 63:: 462–6._[ISI]_
(http://ecam.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/external_ref?access_num=A1982PL97000003&link\
_type=ISI) _[Medline]_
(http://ecam.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/external_ref?access_num=7138256&link_type=ME\
D)
     1.  Kanai S, Taniguchi N. Effect of polarity  exchangeable permanent
magnet on frozen shoulder pain. Pain Clin (  2006;) 18:: 37–45._[CrossRef]_
(http://ecam.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/external_ref?access_num=10.1163/156856906775\
24981
1&link_type=DOI)
     1.  Kanai S, Taniguchi N, Kawamoto M, Endo H,  Higashino H. Effect of
static magnetic field on pain associated with frozen  shoulder. Pain Clin (
2004;) 16:: 173–9._[CrossRef]_
(http://ecam.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/external_ref?access_num=10.1163/156856904774\
134389&link_type=DOI)
     1.  Kim TS. Relation of magnetic field therapy to  pain and power over
time in persons with chronic primary headache: a pilot  study. Visions ( 2001;)
9:: 27–42.
     1.  Langford J, McCarthy PW. Randomised controlled  clinical trial of
magnet use in chronic low back pain; a pilot study. Clin  Chiroprac ( 2005;) 8::
13–9._[CrossRef]_
(http://ecam.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/external_ref?access_num=10.1016/j.clch.2004.\
09.006&link_type=DOI)
     1.  Man D, Man B, Plosker H. The influence of  permanent magnetic field
therapy on wound healing in suction lipectomy  patients: a double-blind study.
Plast Reconstr Surg ( 1999;) 104::  2261–6.; discussion 2267–8._[ISI]_
(http://ecam
.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/external_ref?access_num=000083854900052&link_type=ISI)
_[Medline]_
(http://ecam.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/external_ref?access_num=11149796&link_type=M\
ED)
     1.  Martel GF, Andrews SC, Roseboom CG. Comparison  of static and placebo
magnets on resting forearm blood flow in young, healthy  men. J Orthop Sports
Phys Ther ( 2002;) 32:: 518–24._[ISI]_
(http://ecam.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/external_ref?access_num=000178395100005&link\
_type=ISI) _[Medline]_
(http://ecam.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/external_ref?access_num=12403203&link_type=M\
ED)
     1.  Mayrovitz HN, Groseclose EE. Effects of a static  magnetic field of
either polarity on skin microcirculation. Microvasc  Res ( 2005;) 69:: 24–
7._[CrossRef]_
(http://ecam.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/external_ref?access_num=10.1016/j.mvr.2004.1\
1.002&link_type=DOI) _[ISI]_
(http://ecam.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/external_ref?access_num=000228229500004&link\
_type=ISI) _[Medline]_
(http://ecam.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/external_ref?access_num=15797257&link_type=M\
ED)
     1.  Mayrovitz HN, Groseclose EE, Markov M, Pilla AA.  Effects of
permanent magnets on resting skin blood perfusion in healthy  persons assessed
by
laser Doppler flowmetry and imaging.  Bioelectromagnetics ( 2001;) 22:: 494–
502._[CrossRef]_
(http://ecam.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/external_ref?access_num=10.1002/bem.78&link_\
type=DOI) _[ISI]_
(http://ecam.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/external_ref?access_num=000171246600006&link\
_type=ISI) _[Medline]_
(http://ecam.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/external_ref?access_num=11568935&link_type=M\
ED)
     1.  Mikesky AE, Hayden MW. Effect of static magnetic  therapy on recovery
from delayed onset muscle soreness. Phys Ther Sport  ( 2005;) 6:: 188–
94._[CrossRef]_
(http://ecam.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/external_ref?access_num=10.1016/j.ptsp.2005.\
08.004&link_type=DOI)
     1.  Panagos A, Jensen M, Cardenas DD. Treatment of  myofascial shoulder
pain in the spinal cord injured population using static  magnetic fields: a
case series. J Spinal Cord Med ( 2004;) 27::  138–42._[ISI]_
(http://ecam.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/external_ref?access_num=000221602600011&link\
_type=ISI)
_[Medline]_
(http://ecam.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/external_ref?access_num=15162885&link_type=M\
ED)
     1.  Pope KW, McNally RJ. Nonspecific placebo effects  explain the
therapeutic benefit of magnets. Sci Rev Alternat Med (  2002;) 6:: 13–6.
     1.  Reeser JC, Smith DT, Fischer V, Berg R, Liu K,  Untiedt C, et al.
Static magnetic fields neither prevent nor diminish symptoms  and signs of
delayed onset muscle soreness. Arch Phys Med Rehabil (  2005;) 86:: 565–
70._[CrossRef]_
(http://ecam.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/external_ref?access_num=10.1016/j.apmr.2004.\
04.025&link_type=DOI) _[ISI]_
(http://ecam.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/external_ref?access_num=000227475200033&link\
_type=ISI) _[Medline]_
(http://ecam.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/external_ref?access_num=15759245&link_type=M\
ED)
     1.  Salvatore JR, Harrington J, Kummet T. Phase I  clinical study of a
static magnetic field combined with anti-neoplastic  chemotherapy in the
treatment of human malignancy: initial safety and toxicity  data.
Bioelectromagnetics
( 2003;) 24:: 524–7._[CrossRef]_
(http://ecam.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/external_ref?access_num=10.1002/bem.10149&li\
nk_type=DOI) _[ISI]_
(http://ecam.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/external_ref?access_num=000185455200010&link\
_type=ISI)
_[Medline]_
(http://ecam.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/external_ref?access_num=12955758&link_type=M\
ED)
     1.  Schall DM, Ishee JH, Titlow LW. Effect of  magnetic therapy on
selected physical performances. J Strength Cond Res  ( 2003;) 17:: 299–
302._[CrossRef]_
(http://ecam.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/external_ref?access_num=10.1519/1533-4287(20\
03)017<0299:EOMTOS>2.0.CO;2&link_type=DOI) _[ISI]_
(http://ecam.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/external_ref?access_num=000183280400012&link\
_type=ISI)
_[Medline]_
(http://ecam.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/external_ref?access_num=12741866&link_type=M\
ED)
     1.  Segal N, Huston J, Fuchs H, Holcomb RR, McLean  MJ. Efficacy of a
static magnetic device against knee pain associated with  inflammatory
arthritis.
J Clin Rheumatol ( 1999;) 5:: 302–5._[ISI]_
(http://ecam.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/external_ref?access_num=000083015000017&link\
_type=ISI)
     1.  Segal NA, Toda Y, Huston J, Saeki Y, Shimizu M, Fuchs H, et  al. Two
configurations of static magnetic fields for treating rheumatoid  arthritis of
the knee: a double-blind clinical trial. Arch Phys Med  Rehabil ( 2001;) 82::
1453–60._[CrossRef]_
(http://ecam.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/external_ref?access_num=10.1053/apmr.2001.24\
309&link_type=DOI) _[ISI]_
(http://ecam.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/external_ref?access_num=000171410800018&link\
_type=ISI) _[Medline]_
(http://ecam.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/external_ref?access_num=11588753&link_type=M\
E
D)
     1.  Simoncini L, Giuriati L, Giannini S. Clinical  evaluation of the
effective use of magnetic fields in podology. Chir Organi  Mov ( 2001;) 86::
243–
7._[Medline]_
(http://ecam.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/external_ref?access_num=12025189&link_type=M\
ED)
     1.  Suomi R, Koceja DM. Effect of magnetic insoles  on postural sway
measures in men and women during a static balance test.  Percept Mot Skills (
2001;) 92:: 469–76._[CrossRef]_
(http://ecam.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/external_ref?access_num=10.2466/PMS.92.2.469\
-476&link_type=DOI) _[ISI]_
(http://ecam.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/external_ref?access_num=000168558800020&link\
_type=ISI)
_[Medline]_
(http://ecam.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/external_ref?access_num=11361310&link_type=M\
ED)
     1.  Sweeney KB, Merrick MA, Ingersoll CD, Swez JA.  Therapeutic magnets
do not affect tissue temperatures. J Athl Train (  2001;) 36:: 27–31._[ISI]_
(http://ecam.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/external_ref?access_num=000175745000006&link\
_
type=ISI) _[Medline]_
(http://ecam.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/external_ref?access_num=12937511&link_type=M\
ED)
     1.  Szor JK, Holewinski P. Lessons learned in  research: an attempt to
study the effects of magnetic therapy. Ostomy Wound  Manage ( 2002;) 48:: 24–
9._[Medline]_
(http://ecam.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/external_ref?access_num=15382410&link_type=M\
ED)
     1.  Tis LL, Trinkaus MD, Higbie EJ, Johnson BF,  McCarty FA. Effects of
magnets on concentric and eccentric isokinetic force  production of the
quadriceps group. Isokinet Exerc Sci ( 2000;) 8::  217–21._[ISI]_
(http://ecam.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/external_ref?access_num=000168246100006&link\
_type=ISI)
     1.  Vallbona C, Hazlewood CF, Jurida G. Response of  pain to static
magnetic fields in postpolio patients: a double-blind pilot  study. Arch Phys
Med
Rehabil ( 1997;) 78:: 1200–3._[CrossRef]_
(http://ecam.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/external_ref?access_num=10.1016/S0003-9993(9\
7)90332-4&link_type=DOI) _[ISI]_
(http://ecam.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/external_ref?access_num=A1997YE94500007&link\
_
type=ISI) _[Medline]_
(http://ecam.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/external_ref?access_num=9365349&link_type=ME\
D)
     1.  Weintraub MI. Magnetic bio-stimulation in  painful diabetic
peripheral neuropathy: a novel intervention-a randomized,  double-placebo
crossover
study. Am J Pain Manage ( 1999;) 9::  8–17.
     1.  Weintraub MI. Chronic submaximal magnetic  stimulation in peripheral
neuropathy: is there a beneficial therapeutic  relationship? Am J Pain Manage
( 1998;) 8:: 12–8._[Medline]_
(http://ecam.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/external_ref?access_num=10181230&link_type=M\
ED)
     1.  Weintraub MI, Cole SP. Neuromagnetic treatment  of pain in refractory
carpal tunnel syndrome: an electrophysiological and  placebo analysis. J Back
Musculoskel Rehabil ( 2000;) 15::  77–81.
     1.  Weintraub MI, Steinberg RB, Cole SP. The role of  cutaneous magnetic
stimulation in Failed Back Syndrome. Sem Integrat  Med ( 2005;) 3:: 101–
3._[CrossRef]_
(http://ecam.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/external_ref?access_num=10.1016/j.sigm.2005.\
08.003&link_type=DOI)
     1.  Weintraub MI, Wolfe GI, Barohn RA, Cole SP,  Parry GJ, Hayat G, et
al. Static magnetic field therapy for symptomatic  diabetic neuropathy: a
randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.  Arch Phys Med Rehabil (
2003;)
84:: 736–46._[CrossRef]_
(http://ecam.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/external_ref?access_num=10.1016/S0003-9993(0\
3)00106-0&link_type=DOI) _[ISI]_
(http://ecam.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/external_ref?access_num=000182700900020&link\
_type=ISI)
_[Medline]_
(http://ecam.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/external_ref?access_num=12736891&link_type=M\
ED)
     1.  Winemiller MH, Billow RG, Laskowski ER, Harmsen  WS. Effect of
magnetic vs sham-magnetic insoles on plantar heel pain: a  randomized controlled
trial. JAMA ( 2003;) 290:: 1474–8._[Abstract/Free Full Text]_
(http://ecam.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/ijlink?linkType=ABST&journalCode=jama&resid=\
290/11/1474)
     1.  Winemiller MH, Billow RG, Laskowski ER, Harmsen  WS. Effect of
magnetic vs sham-magnetic insoles on nonspecific foot pain in  the workplace: a
randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Mayo  Clin Proc ( 2005;)
80::
1138–45._[ISI]_
(http://ecam.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/external_ref?access_num=000231552700005&link\
_type=ISI) _[Medline]_
(http://ecam.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/external_ref?access_num=16178493&link_type=M\
ED)
     1.  Wolsko PM, Eisenberg DM, Simon LS, Davis RB,  Walleczek J, Mayo-Smith
M, et al. Double-blind placebo-controlled trial of  static magnets for the
treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee: results of a  pilot study. Alternat
Ther Health Med ( 2004;) 10:: 36–43.
     1.  Brown CS, Ling FW, Wan JY, Pilla AA. Efficacy of  static magnetic
field therapy in chronic pelvic pain: a double-blind pilot  study. Am J Obstet
Gynecol ( 2002;) 187:: 1581–7._[CrossRef]_
(http://ecam.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/external_ref?access_num=10.1067/mob.2002.128\
026&link_type=DOI) _[ISI]_
(http://ecam.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/external_ref?access_num=000180131200056&link\
_type=I
SI) _[Medline]_
(http://ecam.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/external_ref?access_num=12501067&link_type=M\
ED)

Some of these  are negative studies of course.
I have over  700 references to studies on all aspects of magnotherapy, but
I'm always  grateful for new ones.

Best  wishes
John
Marvellousmagnets.com






[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

John here is a short list of published 'JOURNAL" articles on  the benefits of
magnetic fields.

1.       Weintraub MI. Chronic  submaximal magnetic stimulation in peripheral
neuropathy: Is there a beneficial therapeutic  relationship? Am J Pain Manage
1998;  8(1)12-15.
2.       Pauling L, Coryell CD. The magnetic properties and structure  of
hemoglobin, oxyhemoglobin and carbonmonoxyhemoglobin. Proceedings of  National
Academy of  Sciences. 1936;  22(4):210-216.
3.       Kawakubo T, Yamauchi K, Kobayashi T. Effects  of Magnetic field on
metabolic action in the peripheral  tissue. Jpn J Appl Phys 1999;
38:1201-1203.
4.      Machetanz J, Bischoff C, Pichlmeier R. et al. Magnetically induced
muscle  contraction by motor nerve  stimulation and not by direct needle
activation. Muscle & Nerve  1994; 17(10):1170-1175.
5.       Zhu Y, Starr A, Haldeman S, Fu H, Lio J, Wu P. Magnetic stimulation
of muscle evoked cerebral potentials by direct  activation of nerve afferents:
a study during muscle paralysis. Muscle &  Nerve 1996; 19:1570-1575.
6.       Zarola F, Rossini PM. Nerve, spinal cord and brain  somatosensory
evoked responses: a comparative study during electrical  and magnetic peripheral
nerve stimulation. Electroenceph. Clin  Neurophysiol 1991; 80:372-377.
7.       Lednev LL. Possible  mechanisms for the influence of weak magnetic
fields on biological systems.  Bioelectromagnetics 1991; 12:71-75.
8.       Olney RK, So YT, Goodin DS, Aminoff MJ. A comparison of magnetic and
  electrical stimulation of  peripheral nerves. Muscle & Nerve 1990;
13:957-963.
9.       McLean MJ, Holcomb RR,  Wamil AW, et al. Blockage of  sensory neuron
action potentials by a static magnetic field  in the 10 mT range.
Bioelectromagnetics 1995; 16:20-32.
10.   Cavopol AV, Wamil AE, Holcomb RR, McLean MJ. Measurement and analysis
of static  magnetic fields which block action potentials in cultured neurons.
Bioelectromagnetics 1995;  16:197-206.
11.   Torebjork HE, Hallin RG. Perceptual changes accompanying  controlled
preferential blocking of A and C-fiber responses in  intact human skin nerves.
Exp Brain Res 1973;  16:321-332.
12.   Yeomans  DC, Proudfit HK. Nociceptive responses to high and  low rates
of noxious cutaneous  heating are mediated by different nociceptors in the
rat:  electrophysiological evidence. Pain 1996;  68:141-150.
13.   Price DD. Selective  activation of A-delta and C-nociceptive heat
stimulation: a tool for  analysis of central mechanisms of pain. Pain 1996;
68:1-3.
14.   Vallbona C, Hazlewood CF, Jurida G. Response of pain to static magnetic
  fields in postpolio patients: a double-blind pilot study. Arch Phys  Med
Rehabil 1997; 78:1200-1203.
15.   Becker RO. Cross currents.  New  York: The Putnam  Publishing Group;
1990.
16.   Becker RO, Selden G.  The body electric: electromagnetism  and the
foundation of life. New  York: The William Morrow  and Company; 1985.
17.   Miner WK, Markoll R. A double blind trial of the clinical  effects of
pulsed electromagnetic fields on  osteoarthritis. J Rheumatol 1993;
20:456-460.
18.

14
Hansen KM. Some observations with a view to  possible influence of magnetism
upon the human organism. Acta Med Scand  1938; 97:339-364.
19.       Bassett A. Therapeutic uses of electric and  magnetic fields in
orthopedics. In: Carpenter DO, Ayrapetyan S.  editors. Biological effects of
electric and magnetic fields, vol 2:  beneficial and harmful effects. San 
Diego:
Academic Press;  1994:13-34.
20.       Trock DH, Bollet AJ,  Markoll R. The effects of pulsed
electromagnetic fields in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee and 
cervical
spine. Report of  randomized, double blind, placebo controlled trials. J
Rheumatol
1994;  21:1903-1911.
21.       Carpenter DO,  Ayrapetyan S, editors. Biological  effects of
electric and magnetic fields.  San  Diego: Academic Press;  1994.
22.       Tenforde TS, editor.  Magnetic field effect on biological  systems.
Based on the Proceedings of the Biomagnetic Effects Workshop  held at
Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory,  University of  California. April 6-7,  1978.  New
York: Plenum Publishing  Corporation; 1979.
23.       Adey WR, Chopart A. Cell surface ionic phenomena in  transmembrane
signaling to intracellular enzyme systems. In: Blank M,  Findl E, editors.
Mechanistic  approaches to interactions of  electromagnetic fields with living
systems.  New  York: Plenum Press; 1987;  365-387.
24.       Adey WR. Tissue interactions with non-ionizing  electromagnetic
fields. Physiol Rev 1981;  61:435-514.
25.       Hong CZ, Lin JC,  Bender LF, Schaeffer JN, Meltzer RJ, Causin P.
Magnetic necklace: its therapeutic effectiveness on neck and  shoulder pain.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1982;  63:462-466.
26.       Hong CZ, Harmon D, Yu  J. Static magnetic field influence  on rat
tail nerve function. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1986;  67:746-749.
27.       Hong CZ. Static magnetic field influence on  human nerve function.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1987;  68:162-164.
28.  Itegin M, Gunay I,  Logoglu G, Isbir T. Effects of  static magnetic
field on specific adenosine-5’-triphosphatase activities  and bioelectrical
and
biomechanical properties in the rat diaphragm muscle.  Bioelectromagnetics 1995;
16:147-151.
29.  World Health  Organization. Magnetic fields.  United Nations Environment
Programme. The International Labour  Organization. Geneva: WHO;  1987.
30.  Ardizzone V. Possible mechanisms for the  therapeutic effectiveness of
the triangularboard static magnetic field  design. June 15,  1999.
31.  Weintraub MI. Magnetic bio-stimulation in painful  diabetic peripheral
neuropathy: A novel intervention- a randomized,  double-placebo crossover
study. Am J Pain Manage 1999;  9(1):12-17.
32.  Greene DA, Latimer SA,  Sima AA. Are disturbances of  sorbitol,
phosphoinositide, and  Na+ K+ ATPase regulation involved in the pathogenesis of
diabetic  neuropathy? Diabetes 1988; 37:688-693.
33.  Holcomb RR, Parker RA,  Harrison MS. Biomagnetics in the  treatment of
human pain-Past, Present, Future. Environmental Medicine  1991; 8:24-30.
34.  Colbert A. Magnetic mattress pad use in patients  with fibromyalgia: a
randomized double-blind study. J. Back  Musculoskel Rehabil 1999, 13:19-31.
35.

15
Segal N,  Houston J, Fuchs H, Holcomb  RR, McLean MJ. Efficacy of a  static
magnetic device against  knee pain associated with inflammatory arthritis. J
Clin Rheumatol  1999; 5:5.
36.       Owens C. Magnetic fields influence the  structure of tissues in
knee OA. Ortho Today Feb 2000;  76.
37.       Vallbona C, Richards  T. Evolution of magnetic therapy  from
alternative to traditional  medicine. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am Aug 1999;
10(3):729-54.
38.       Jerabeck J, Pawluk W.  Magnetic therapy in  Eastern  Europe a
review of 30 years  of research. William Pawluk, MD,  MSc, Publisher, 1998.
39.       Eisenberg DM, Davis  RB, Ettner SL, Appel S, Wilkey S, Rompay M,
Kessler RC. Trends in alternative medicine use in  the United States, 1990-1997:
results of a follow-up national survey.  JAMA 1998 Nov 11; 280(18):1569-1575.
40.    Colorio EB [nee Bauer], Desio SM. Static  magnetic field therapy as an
adjunct in the treatment of patellofemoral  pain syndrome. 2000; Presented to
Dr. John S. Urse (Past President and Vice-President,  American Osteopathic
Academy of Orthopedics [AOAO]) and the department of  orthopedic surgery, at the
monthly department meeting/residents’ training;  Grandview Medical Center,
Dayton, Ohio, July  2003.
41.     Colorio EB [nee Bauer], Desio SM.Case  study: the efficacy of static
magnetic fields on patellofemoral pain  syndrome: a double-blind placebo
controlled crossover study.  1999; Presented to Dr. John S.  Urse (Past
President
and Vice-President, American Osteopathic Academy of  Orthopedics [AOAO]) and
the department of orthopedic surgery, at the  monthly department
meeting/residents’ training; Grandview Medical  Center, Dayton, Ohio, July 
2003.
42.    Colorio EB [nee Bauer], Desio SM. Extracorporeal magnetic stimulation
static and dynamic magnetic field therapy of the quadriceps femoris: a
clinical trial. 2000; Presented to Dr. John S. Urse (Past President  and
Vice-President, American Osteopathic Academy of Orthopedics [AOAO])  and the
department
of orthopedic surgery, at the monthly department  meeting/residents’ training;
Grandview Medical Center, Dayton, Ohio, July  2003.
43.    Colorio EB [nee Bauer], Desio SM.The effects of static and dynamic
magnetic fields on the modification of quadriceps atrophy and inhibition:  a
multicenter study. Plan of Investigation; 2000.Presented to Dr. John  S. Urse
(Past President and Vice-President, American Osteopathic Academy  of Orthopedics
[AOAO]) and the department of orthopedic surgery, at the  monthly department
meeting/residents’ training; Grandview Medical  Center, Dayton, Ohio, July
2003.
44.  Colorio EB [nee Bauer], 2003. Discussion: static magnetic fields in
medicine—pioneering their integration into medical healthcare.  Presented to
Dr.
John S. Urse (Past President and Vice-President, American  Osteopathic Academy
of Orthopedics [AOAO]) and the department of  orthopedic surgery, at the
monthly department meeting/residents’ training;  Grandview Medical Center,
Dayton,
  Ohio, July  2003.
44.   Weintraub MI et al. Static magnetic field therapy for  symptomatic
diabetic neuropathy: a randomized, double-blind  placebo-controlled trial. Arch
Phys Med Rehabil 2003; 84:736-746.
45.  Hinman MR, Ford J, Heyl H. Effects of static magnets on chronic  knee
pain and physical function: a double-blind study. Alt There 2000;  10(4): 50-55.
46.  Colorio, EB. Energy fields in motion: bioresonant  synchronicity.
Biophotonics Research Institute; 2003.
_http://www.biophotonicsresearchinstitute.com/ShortArticles.htm_
(http://www.biophotonicsresearchinstitute.com/ShortArticles.htm)
47.  Popp FA, Ruth  B, Bahr W, Böhm , Grass P, Grolig  G, Rattemeyer M,
Schmidt HG, and Wulle P. Emission  of visible and ultraviolet radiation by
active
biological  systems. Collective Phenomena  1981; 3:187-214.
48.  Popp FA. Photon emissions from biological  systems. World Scientific
Publishers,  Singapore; 1987; 137-152.
49.  Popp FA.  About  the coherence of biophoton, microscopic quantum
coherence, proceedings of  an international conference. World Scientific, New
Jersey, NJ;  1999.
50.  Popp FA. The implications of The Gaia Thesis:  Symbiosis, Cooperativity
and Coherence. 3rd Cameford  Conference; Nov 1989.
51.  Fleming AHJ. Applications of computational  bioelectromagnetics. PhD
thesis, Department of Applied Mathematics,  Faculty of Science, Monash
University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia; 1996.
52.  Fleming AHJ. Towards computational methods for  studying cellular
effects due to EM field. Applied Computational  Electromagnetics Conference,
Naval
Postgraduate College, Monterey, California; March  15-19, 1999.
53.

16
Fleming  AHJ. EM self-field theory: the  electron in hydrogen atom.
Biophotonics Research  Institute; 2003a.
_http://www.biophotonicsresearchinstitute.com_
(http://www.biophotonicsresearchinstitute.com/)
54.  Fleming AHJ, Colorio EB. The  Photon and its energy. Biophotonics
Research Institute; 2003.  _http://www.biophotonicsresearchinstitute.com_
(http://www.biophotonicsresearchinstitute.com)

55.Fleming AHJ, Colorio EB [nee Bauer]. A predicted  photon chemistry. 26th
Annual Meeting of the  Bioelectromagnetic Society (BEMS);  Washington  DC, June
20-24, 2004a. _http://www.unifiedphysics.com_ (http://www.unifiedphysics.com)

56.  Fleming AHJ, Colorio EB  [nee Bauer]. The spectroscopy of the EM field.
3rd  International Workshop on Biological Effects of EMFs;  Kos,  Greece, 4-8
October  2004b.
57.  Bauer EB, Cooper K, Fleming AHJ.  The effects of acoustic frequencies on
core tendon lesions  of the thoroughbred racehorse. 27th Annual Meeting of
the  Bioelectromagnetic Society (BEMS); Dublin,  Ireland, June 19-25,  2005.
58.  Fleming, AHJ. EM self-field theory:  the electron and an infinite mass
proton in the hydrogen atom. Physics  Essays. September 2005;18:3. [significant
theoretical contributions to  this paper, listed in the acknowledgments]
_http://www.unifiedphysics.com_ (http://www.unifiedphysics.com)
59.  Fleming AHJ, Bauer EB.  Self-field theory: a mathematics for
bioelectromagnetics.  28th Annual Meeting of the Bioelectromagnetic Society 
(BEMS);
Cancun,  Mexico, June 11-15, 2006.
60.  Bauer EB, Cooper K. Case study: the  efficacy of equine cymatherapy®
bioresonance on a superficial  digital flexor tendon core lesion of a
thoroughbred racehorse colt.  2005. _http://www.cymatherapy.com_
(http://www.cymatherapy.com)
61.  Bauer EB, Cooper K. Case study: the  efficacy of equine cymatherapy®
bioresonance on severe  disruption of the superficial digital flexor tendon (95%
involvement by  multiple core lesions) in a thoroughbred racehorse. 2006.
_http://www.cymatherapy.com_ (http://www.cymatherapy.com)
62.  Bauer EB. Cymatherapy®  orthopedic solutions: sound advice in sports
medicine.  ASHA  School of Massage;  Norcross,  Georgia, August 19,  2006.
63.  Bauer EB, Fleming AHJ.  Inside the photon: a journey to health in a
bioresonant universe.  Cymatics Conference; Atlanta,  Georgia, October 21-22,
2006. _http://www.cymatherapy.com_ (http://www.cymatherapy.com)
64.  Bauer EB (principle author), Cooper K (co-author, study presenter). The
efficacy of  cymatherapy® bioresonance on core lesions of the superficial
digital flexor tendon in thoroughbred racehorses: case studies.  Cymatics
Conference; Atlanta,  Georgia, October 21-22, 2006. _http://www.cymatherapy.com_
(http://www.cymatherapy.com) .
66.  Bauer EB. Cymatique®  facial rejuvenation: preliminary study. Cymatics
Conference;  Atlanta,  Georgia, October 21-22, 2006.
_http://www.cymatherapy.com_ (http://www.cymatherapy.com)
67.  Bauer EB (principle author), Bergeron R (study presenter). Cymatherapy®
perfusion  thermography: preliminary investigations. Cymatics Conference;
Atlanta,  Georgia, October 21-22, 2006. _http://www.cymatherapy.com_
(http://www.cymatherapy.com)
68.  Bauer EB, Fleming AHJ et al.  Acoustic/magnetic field perfusion study.
2nd  International Conference on Electromagnetic Fields, Health and Environment
  (EHE); Wroclaw,  Poland, September 10-12, 2007. In press.
69.  Bauer EB. The photon  and phonon: symphony of the cells. Cymatics
Conference;  Atlanta,  Georgia, September 14-16, 2007.
_http://www.cymatherapy.com._
(http://www.cymatherapy.com.)
70.  Bauer EB. The photon and phonon: the healing  journey with light and
sound. Globe Sound Healing  Conference; Los Angeles,  California, January 26-28,
2008. Confirmed  presenter.
71.  Globe Sound Healing Conference; San  Francisco, California,  May 2-5,
2008. Invited  presenter, to be confirmed.
72.Weintraub MI. Magnet therapy the real truth. January 10,  2006.Michael  I.
Weintraub, M.D., F.A.C.P., F.A.A.N. Clinical Professor of Neurology .
Clinical Professor of Internal Medicine
New  York  Medical  College.
73.  Weintraub  MI: Magnetotherapy: Historical background with a stimulating
future.  Critical Reviews in Physical and Rehab Medicine 2004; 16: 95-108.
74. Blechman  AM, Oz MC, Nair V, Ting W. Discrepancy between claimed field
flux density  of some commercially available magnets and actual gaussmeter
measurements.  Alt Ther 2001; 7: 92-95.
75. Carter R,  Hall T, Aspy CB, Mold J. The effectiveness of magnetic therapy
for  treatment of wrist pain attributed to carpal tunnel syndrome. J Family
Practice 2002; 51: 38-40.
76. Weintraub,  MI. Neuromagnetic treatment of pain in refractory carpal
tunnel syndrome:  an electrophysiological and placebo analysis. J Back
Musculoskel
Rehab  2002; 15: 77-81.
77.  Weintraub, MI, Magnetic bio-stimulation in  painful diabetic peripheral
neuropathy: a novel intervention. A  randomized, double-placebo crossover
study. Amer J Pain Mgt 1999; 9: 8-17.
78. Weintraub  MI, Wolfe GI, Barohn RA, et al. Static magnetic field therapy
for  symptomatic diabetic neuropathy: a randomized, double-blind,
placebo-controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehab 2003; 84: 736-746.
79.  Bioelectromagnetic Medicine: Rosch PJ, Markov MS (eds). Marcel Dekker,
Inc. New York 2004.
80. Chakeres  DW, Dee Vocht F. Static magnetic field effects on human
subjects related  to Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) systems. Progress in
Biophysics
and  Molecular Biology 2005; 87: 255-265.
81. Weintraub, MI, Khoury A, Cole  SP. Biologic effects of induced current by
3 Tesla (T) MRI imaging.  Comparison with traditional 1.5 Tesla and 0.7 Tesla
in 494 consecutive  cases. (Abstract submitted to 58 Annual Meeting of
American Academy of  Neurology, April 1-8,  2006.  Decision for acceptance will
be
made in February.)
82. Handbook of transcranial  magnetic stimulation. Pascual-Leone A,
Wasserman EM,  Davey NJ (eds)    Oxford University Press,  London, UK 2002.
83. Weintraub,  MI. Magnetic insoles. Mayo Clin Proc 2006; 81: 2.
84,.  NCCAM. Annual report to our  stockholders.1999; NCCAM website.
_http://nccam.nih.gov_ (http://nccam.nih.gov)

Peace, love and a kinder answer,
Liz  Bauer







NOTICE TO RECIPIENT: THIS E-MAIL IS MEANT FOR ONLY  THE INTENDED RECIPIENT OF
THE TRANSMISSION, AND MAY BE A COMMUNICATION  PRIVILEGED BY LAW. ANY REVIEW,
USE, DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION, OR  COPYING OF THIS E-MAIL IS STRICTLY
PROHIBITED. IF YOU RECEIVED THIS E-MAIL  IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY ME IMMEDIATELY
OF
THE ERROR BY RETURN E-MAIL AND  PLEASE DELETE THIS MESSAGE FROM YOUR SYSTEM.
THANK YOU IN ADVANCE FOR YOUR  COOPERATION.



**************************************See AOL's top rated recipes
(http://food.aol.com/top-rated-recipes?NCID=aoltop00030000000004)


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

In a message dated 17/12/2007 07:11:21 GMT Standard Time,
com1@... writes:

Are you  familiar with the Post MRI Syndrome?



Yes, but it is anecdotal evidence, not 'valid' peer-reviewed studies. and  as
such dismissed by professors Finegold & Flamm.

We all know that magnotherapy works, but there is no acceptable concensus
about the mechanism and not enough replicated peer-reviewed studies to convince
main-stream science and medicine.
Yet.

I have added Agatha Colbert's "Static Magnetic Field Therapy: A Critical
Review of Treatment Parameters" to the Files section of this  group.
_http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/magnotherapy/files/_
(http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/magnotherapy/files/)

Best wishes
John
Marvellousmagnets.com






[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

In a message dated 17/12/2007 06:58:52 GMT Standard Time,
com1@... writes:

>>>>>>I am sorry if I have offended anyone who  uses the multipolar type
pads. >>>>>





No problem, this is a discussion  group.



>>>>>>It
is just there is such strong  testing and microscopic findings in support of
the basic Negative healing  pole - especially the neutralization of oxidative
stress which requires  the Negative pole. The immediate resolution of
oxidative stress relates  exactly to the immediate reduction of inflammation
which does not resolve  very quickly with bi or multipolar fields. It is
negative energy that  create cellular transfer efficiency - that which health
stems  from.>>>>>





Accept that, but Agatha Colbert in  the 2007 review of magnet therapy states
"Also  excluded were studies reporting on the use of magnets on acupuncture
points. We believe the stimulation of acupuncture points by means  of a
magnetic field may work via a systemic mechanism (_12_
(http://ecam.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/full/nem131v1#B12#B12) )  different
from that occurring as a
result of a magnetic field  applied directly to an anatomical/pathological
target
tissue.  "

We may be talking about different  things and both be right.


>>>>>FYI, we have been reversing diabetes, black feet,  neuropathy with an
oral
vascular plaque chelation super charged by using  the Negative over the heart
or lower CVS if the heart is problematical.  WE also have been regenerating
nerves, tendons, all hard and soft tissue  and waking a few out of terminal
comas. We use the fields singularly -  never in multipolar designs. We have
never been able to get those results  with multipolar fields and adhere to
Becker, Davis and other single pole  therapy studies.>>>>>



I can offer a similar list of problems  solved using multipolar wristbands.
   _http://sound-ideas.info/17.html_ (http://sound-ideas.info/17.html)

Like you I have no wish to offend, but  I think there is a lot more to be
learnt about magnotherapy.

Best wishes
John
Marvellousmagnets.com














[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Are you familiar with the Post MRI Syndrome?

Peter



From: magnotherapy@yahoogroups.com [mailto:magnotherapy@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of phunkc@...
Sent: Sunday, December 16, 2007 9:54 PM
To: magnotherapy@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [magnotherapy] Torn Cartilage in Knee





First I will address the MRI.

The MRI simply aligns the hydrogen atom to a perpendicular alignment with
the MF for the optimal angle of permeation of the RF (radio frequency)
emitted.
RF waves used in MRI imaging cause the hydrogen atom nucleus to flip in its
spin and change alignment. The nuclei then relax and re-emit the RF waves at

different frequencies depending on the chemical environment of the molecule.

When the radio waves are turned off, the nuclei return to the state of low
energy, returning to their natural position and give off photons. The
photons
produce energy signals that are analyzed by a receiver in the MRI machine.

Peace, love and a kinder answer,
Liz

NOTICE TO RECIPIENT: THIS E-MAIL IS MEANT FOR ONLY THE INTENDED RECIPIENT OF

THE TRANSMISSION, AND MAY BE A COMMUNICATION PRIVILEGED BY LAW. ANY REVIEW,
USE, DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION, OR COPYING OF THIS E-MAIL IS STRICTLY
PROHIBITED. IF YOU RECEIVED THIS E-MAIL IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY ME
IMMEDIATELY OF
THE ERROR BY RETURN E-MAIL AND PLEASE DELETE THIS MESSAGE FROM YOUR SYSTEM.
THANK YOU IN ADVANCE FOR YOUR COOPERATION.

**************************************See AOL's top rated recipes
(http://food.aol.com/top-rated-recipes?NCID=aoltop00030000000004)

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

In a message dated 17/12/2007 02:55:03 GMT Standard Time, phunkc@...
writes:

>>>>>The MRI simply aligns the hydrogen atom to a   perpendicular alignment
with
the MF for the optimal angle of permeation  of  the RF (radio frequency)
emitted.
RF waves used in MRI imaging  cause the  hydrogen atom nucleus to flip in its
spin and change  alignment. The nuclei  then relax and re-emit the RF waves
at
different frequencies  depending on the chemical environment of the
molecule.
When the radio  waves are turned off, the nuclei return to  the state of low
energy,  returning to their natural position and  give off photons. The
photons
produce energy signals that are  analyzed by a receiver in the MRI machine.>>>


Yup, but a prominent physics professor uses the strong fields in an  MRI as
part of his argument that
"Patients should  be advised that magnet therapy has no proved benefits. If
they insist on using a magnetic device they could be advised to buy the cheapest
—this will at least alleviate the pain in their  wallet.
Leonard  Finegold, professor Department of Physics, Drexel  University,
Philadelphia, PA 19014,  USA, January  2006.
The point I was making was that there is no concensus in the physics
community about the mechanism behind magnetic treatments otherwise he would not 
be
able to have these comments printed in a peer reviewed  periodical.
Or am I being naive about peer-reviewed periodicals  <g>
Best wishes
John
Marvellousmagnets.com






[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

I am sorry if I have offended anyone who uses the multipolar type pads. It
is just there is such strong testing and microscopic findings in support of
the basic Negative healing pole - especially the neutralization of oxidative
stress which requires the Negative pole. The immediate resolution of
oxidative stress relates exactly to the immediate reduction of inflammation
which does not resolve very quickly with bi or multipolar fields. It is
negative energy that create cellular transfer efficiency - that which health
stems from.



FYI, we have been reversing diabetes, black feet, neuropathy with an oral
vascular plaque chelation super charged by using the Negative over the heart
or lower CVS if the heart is problematical. WE also have been regenerating
nerves, tendons, all hard and soft tissue and waking a few out of terminal
comas. We use the fields singularly - never in multipolar designs. We have
never been able to get those results with multipolar fields and adhere to
Becker, Davis and other single pole therapy studies.

Peter Kulish



From: magnotherapy@yahoogroups.com [mailto:magnotherapy@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of JBainSI@...
Sent: Sunday, December 16, 2007 6:27 AM
To: magnotherapy@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [magnotherapy] Torn Cartilage in Knee




In a message dated 16/12/2007 10:48:18 GMT Standard Time, phunkc@...
<mailto:phunkc%40aol.com>
writes:

>>>>>>Weintraub MI et al. Static Magnetic Field Therapy for Symptomatic
Diabetic
Neuropathy: a Randonized, Double-blind Placebo-controlled Trial. Archives o
f
Physical medicine and Rehabilitation. May 2oo3:84;736-746.
Peace, love and a kinder answer,

Hi Liz,
This is a multipole study.
Do you know what brand of insoles were used?

Best wishes
John
Marvellousmagnets.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

First I will address the MRI.

The MRI simply aligns the hydrogen atom to a  perpendicular alignment with
the MF for the optimal angle of permeation of  the RF (radio frequency) emitted.
RF waves used in MRI imaging cause the  hydrogen atom nucleus to flip in its
spin and change alignment. The nuclei  then relax and re-emit the RF waves at
different frequencies  depending on the chemical environment of the molecule.
When the radio  waves are turned off, the nuclei return to the state of low
energy,  returning to their natural position and give off photons. The photons
produce energy signals that are analyzed by a receiver in the MRI machine.



Peace, love and a kinder  answer,
Liz









NOTICE TO RECIPIENT: THIS E-MAIL IS MEANT FOR ONLY  THE INTENDED RECIPIENT OF
THE TRANSMISSION, AND MAY BE A COMMUNICATION  PRIVILEGED BY LAW. ANY REVIEW,
USE, DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION, OR  COPYING OF THIS E-MAIL IS STRICTLY
PROHIBITED. IF YOU RECEIVED THIS E-MAIL  IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY ME IMMEDIATELY
OF
THE ERROR BY RETURN E-MAIL AND  PLEASE DELETE THIS MESSAGE FROM YOUR SYSTEM.
THANK YOU IN ADVANCE FOR YOUR  COOPERATION.



**************************************See AOL's top rated recipes
(http://food.aol.com/top-rated-recipes?NCID=aoltop00030000000004)


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

In a message dated 16/12/2007 13:50:59 GMT Standard Time, phunkc@...
writes:

>>>>>>First of all I am a researcher and a scientist.  My field is  applied
biophysics. The is NO such thing as a unipole  magnet. Trust me on  that one.
A unipole
anything does NOT exist in  this universe. Even the  atom itself is matter by
the virtue of both  positive and negative charges.  All molecules align and
attract to  become visible objects by virtue of  their dipolar  charges.>>>>>


Absolutely agree.   As I pointed out in another post what is  called a
unipolar approach is merely one with the other pole 'hidden' behind  the 'active
pole'


>>>>>>Magnetics are a VERY powerful healing  modality. I cannot sit  by and
allow
vendors of magnetic products  continue to make magnetics into  'snake oil'
because they don't  understand the physics behind them. Please  all...learn
your
science  and you will be able to sell your   products.>>>>>>

There is still no consensus  over the physics behind magnetic products.   If
there was,
Leonard Finegold, of the Department of Physics, Drexel University with Bruce
Flamm would not be able to have an editorial  printed in the BMJ stating
"However—even theoretically—magnet therapy seems  unrealistic.  If human
tissue were affected by magnets,  one would expect the massive fields generated
by magnetic resonance  imaging (MRI) to have profound effects. Yet the much
higher  magnetic fields of MRI show neither ill nor healing effects.
Extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence. If there  is any healing
effect of magnets, it is apparently small since  published research, both
theoretical and experimental, is weighted  heavily against any therapeutic
benefit. "
This was in the January 2006 issue of the British Medical  Journal.

>>>>>To  answer your question on the Weintraub study. The  insoles were
Nikken. If
this group allows attachments I will send the  entire study as a pdf
attachment.>>>>>>>
Attachments are not allowed,  but we have a files section.   If you cannot
post it there, send me  a copy and I will post it for you..




Best wishes
John
Marvellousmagnets.com






[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Hello John,

First of all I am a researcher and a scientist. My field is  applied
biophysics. The is NO such thing as a unipole magnet. Trust me on  that one. A
unipole
anything does NOT exist in this universe. Even the  atom itself is matter by
the virtue of both positive and negative charges.  All molecules align and
attract to become visible objects by virtue of  their dipolar charges.

In the human body the negative pole of any magnet changes the  spin of the
positive sodium and potassium ions...pain is stopped by  magnetics because of:
1. Coulombs law
2. Lorentz force effect
3.Faraday's law

Do also study the sodium/potassium pump and Wall and  Melzack's gate control
theory.

Magnetics are a VERY powerful healing modality. I cannot sit  by and allow
vendors of magnetic products continue to make magnetics into  'snake oil'
because they don't understand the physics behind them. Please  all...learn your
science and you will be able to sell your  products.

Knowledge is power...bull shit is bull shit.

To answer your question on the Weintraub study. The  insoles were Nikken. If
this group allows attachments I will send the  entire study as a pdf
attachment.

Peace, love and a kinder  answer,
Liz









NOTICE TO RECIPIENT: THIS E-MAIL IS MEANT FOR ONLY  THE INTENDED RECIPIENT OF
THE TRANSMISSION, AND MAY BE A COMMUNICATION  PRIVILEGED BY LAW. ANY REVIEW,
USE, DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION, OR  COPYING OF THIS E-MAIL IS STRICTLY
PROHIBITED. IF YOU RECEIVED THIS E-MAIL  IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY ME IMMEDIATELY
OF
THE ERROR BY RETURN E-MAIL AND  PLEASE DELETE THIS MESSAGE FROM YOUR SYSTEM.
THANK YOU IN ADVANCE FOR YOUR  COOPERATION.



**************************************See AOL's top rated recipes
(http://food.aol.com/top-rated-recipes?NCID=aoltop00030000000004)


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

In a message dated 16/12/2007 10:48:18 GMT Standard Time, phunkc@...
writes:

>>>>>>Weintraub MI et al. Static Magnetic Field   Therapy for Symptomatic
Diabetic
Neuropathy: a Randonized,  Double-blind  Placebo-controlled Trial. Archives o
f
Physical  medicine and  Rehabilitation. May 2oo3:84;736-746.
Peace, love   and a kinder answer,


Hi Liz,
This is a multipole study.
Do you know what brand of insoles were used?

Best wishes
John
Marvellousmagnets.com











[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

In a message dated 16/12/2007 09:48:05 GMT Standard Time,
com1@... writes:

>>>>>I am sorry, but I have to insist: The human body  absolutely needs the
Negative charge in the blood to maintain its singular  high nutritional/waste
transfer efficiency function. With any Positive  charge, the cells lose their
Negative potential and go into the inefficient  and  ill rouleau pattern.



I am not disputing that, merely stating that some multipolar designs seem  to
be able to do that as shown by the anecdotal evidence.
And there are no published scientific studies that I know of showing a
significant difference between the effects of positive and negative poles.
So, the mechanism must be more complex than we realise.
Time, and more studies, will reveal all.
In the meantime, I feel perfectly safe recommending a multipolar design to
people with problems.
Including MS.

Best wishes
John
Marvellousmagnets.com






[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Weintraub MI et al. Static Magnetic Field  Therapy for Symptomatic Diabetic
Neuropathy: a Randonized, Double-blind  Placebo-controlled Trial. Archives of
Physical medicine and  Rehabilitation. May 2oo3:84;736-746.

Peace, love  and a kinder answer,
Liz









NOTICE TO RECIPIENT: THIS E-MAIL IS MEANT FOR ONLY  THE INTENDED RECIPIENT OF
THE TRANSMISSION, AND MAY BE A COMMUNICATION  PRIVILEGED BY LAW. ANY REVIEW,
USE, DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION, OR  COPYING OF THIS E-MAIL IS STRICTLY
PROHIBITED. IF YOU RECEIVED THIS E-MAIL  IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY ME IMMEDIATELY
OF
THE ERROR BY RETURN E-MAIL AND  PLEASE DELETE THIS MESSAGE FROM YOUR SYSTEM.
THANK YOU IN ADVANCE FOR YOUR  COOPERATION.



**************************************See AOL's top rated recipes
(http://food.aol.com/top-rated-recipes?NCID=aoltop00030000000004)


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

In a message dated 16/12/2007 09:46:47 GMT Standard Time,
com1@... writes:


>>>>>Listen. I am not here to burst bubbles - only to  lend some science.
When you
mention other fluids such as water, you are  also talking about using the
proper magnetic field to burst the cages  from nucleating before forming
crystalline structures such as scale and  creating enough millivoltage to
attract and re-absorb (hydrate) the  existing scale - literally potentiating
the fluid in  a positive  manner over that of the original negative
millivoltage present in  hardwater. When you reduce the functioning
electromotive field by a bi or  multipolar treatment, the functional acting
voltage is reduced  considerably. >>>>>>



Holcomb's work at  Vanderbilt University indicates the the end result is
increased, that multipole  treatments are more effective.   This doesn't mean
you
are wrong,  merely that mechanism is not fully understood yet.
Effects of Steady Magnetic Fields on Action  Potentials of Sensory Neurons in
Vitro
Michael J. McLean,  M.D., Ph.D., Robert R. Holcomb, M.D., Ph.D., Artur W.
Wamil, M.D., Ph.D., Joel  D. Pickett, M.D.
Environmental  Medicine, Volume 8, No.2. 36-45, 1991.

>>>>>It is fine to  use either pole on fuel, but the engineers who do para to
ortho  stoichiometry take it a lot further than that to get the proper
results.  This also includes doing harmonic balancing of the potentials.
>>>>>





Yup,  but a multipolar approach seems to work consistently enough for anyone
to fit  and use.




>>>>>In  relationship to using an aggregate Positive field on tissue, it is
good
for  increasing inter and intra fluids - especially important when  separating
vertebrae. All positive fields should be supported by Negative  surrounding
energies to prevent any precursors from activating.  >>>>



Perhaps  that is the secret, some multipole designs do just that.


best  wishes
John
Marvellousmagnets.com






[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

In a message dated 16/12/2007 09:27:29 GMT Standard Time,
com1@... writes:

>>>>>>>There are no tests that show an increase in  cellular voltages or
increasing
nutrient transfer/toxic dumping or bumping  up the immune system or
neutralizing oxidative stress with multipolar  fields. >>>>>



Agreed, there are very few published tests.   And in  vitro tests do not mean
the conclusions are valid in vivo.



>>>>>There is an initiating mechanism and a depth  function to pulsed fields
which
always have the opposite collapsing field  during phase. But static
multipolar fields do not immediately increase  voltage and cancel free
radicals and work by signaling stress to the brain  which in turn sends more
Negative energy to overcome the increased stress.  Pardon, but I have always
thought this was kinda like re-burning your  finger to make it heal
faster.>>>>



Are you suggesting pulsed fields do not exhibit the problems observed by
static multipolar fields?
If so, flow past a static field has a similar rise and fall for the
components of the fluid flowing.

You see problems with multi-pole applications for health, I see solutions  to
problems.
But then I use multipole techniques every day.

Best wishes
John
Marvellousmagnets.com













[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

I am sorry, but I have to insist: The human body absolutely needs the
Negative charge in the blood to maintain its singular high nutritional/waste
transfer efficiency function. With any Positive charge, the cells lose their
Negative potential and go into the inefficient and  ill rouleau pattern.

Peter Kulish



From: magnotherapy@yahoogroups.com [mailto:magnotherapy@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of JBainSI@...
Sent: Saturday, December 15, 2007 12:29 PM
To: magnotherapy@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [magnotherapy] Torn Cartilage in Knee




In a message dated 15/12/2007 17:21:29 GMT Standard Time,
com1@... <mailto:com1%40magnetfoundation.org>  writes:

>>>>>The
voltage and cellular microscopic including all of the science of the cell's
parallel capacitance, capillary beds & cytoplasm, metabolic function,
immune functions, oxidoreductase ATP only supports the supplemental support
of the human Negative Zeta potential - not Positive multipolar fields.
Sorry. Or please send me to the new science that overrides this known
physiology - I am totally open.

No new science, just the simple physics and chemistry of magnetic fields on
fluid flow.
Compare it with the effects on fuel and water.
Blood is just another fluid and the effects can help the body work more
effectively as shown by the anecdotal results.
It's no good saying it can't possibly work, it does.

Best wishes

John
Marvellousmagnets.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Listen. I am not here to burst bubbles - only to lend some science. When you
mention other fluids such as water, you are also talking about using the
proper magnetic field to burst the cages from nucleating before forming
crystalline structures such as scale and creating enough millivoltage to
attract and re-absorb (hydrate) the existing scale - literally potentiating
the fluid in  a positive manner over that of the original negative
millivoltage present in hardwater. When you reduce the functioning
electromotive field by a bi or multipolar treatment, the functional acting
voltage is reduced considerably.



It is fine to use either pole on fuel, but the engineers who do para to
ortho stoichiometry take it a lot further than that to get the proper
results. This also includes doing harmonic balancing of the potentials.



In relationship to using an aggregate Positive field on tissue, it is good
for increasing inter and intra fluids - especially important when separating
vertebrae. All positive fields should be supported by Negative surrounding
energies to prevent any precursors from activating.



Peter Kulish



From: magnotherapy@yahoogroups.com [mailto:magnotherapy@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of JBainSI@...
Sent: Saturday, December 15, 2007 12:29 PM
To: magnotherapy@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [magnotherapy] Torn Cartilage in Knee




In a message dated 15/12/2007 17:21:29 GMT Standard Time,
com1@... <mailto:com1%40magnetfoundation.org>  writes:

>>>>>The
voltage and cellular microscopic including all of the science of the cell's
parallel capacitance, capillary beds & cytoplasm, metabolic function,
immune functions, oxidoreductase ATP only supports the supplemental support
of the human Negative Zeta potential - not Positive multipolar fields.
Sorry. Or please send me to the new science that overrides this known
physiology - I am totally open.

No new science, just the simple physics and chemistry of magnetic fields on
fluid flow.
Compare it with the effects on fuel and water.
Blood is just another fluid and the effects can help the body work more
effectively as shown by the anecdotal results.
It's no good saying it can't possibly work, it does.

Best wishes

John
Marvellousmagnets.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

There are no tests that show an increase in cellular voltages or increasing
nutrient transfer/toxic dumping or bumping up the immune system or
neutralizing oxidative stress with multipolar fields.



There is an initiating mechanism and a depth function to pulsed fields which
always have the opposite collapsing field during phase. But static
multipolar fields do not immediately increase voltage and cancel free
radicals and work by signaling stress to the brain which in turn sends more
Negative energy to overcome the increased stress. Pardon, but I have always
thought this was kinda like re-burning your finger to make it heal faster.

Peter Kulish



From: magnotherapy@yahoogroups.com [mailto:magnotherapy@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of JBainSI@...
Sent: Saturday, December 15, 2007 12:29 PM
To: magnotherapy@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [magnotherapy] Torn Cartilage in Knee




In a message dated 15/12/2007 17:21:29 GMT Standard Time,
com1@... <mailto:com1%40magnetfoundation.org>  writes:

>>>>>The
voltage and cellular microscopic including all of the science of the cell's
parallel capacitance, capillary beds & cytoplasm, metabolic function,
immune functions, oxidoreductase ATP only supports the supplemental support
of the human Negative Zeta potential - not Positive multipolar fields.
Sorry. Or please send me to the new science that overrides this known
physiology - I am totally open.

No new science, just the simple physics and chemistry of magnetic fields on
fluid flow.
Compare it with the effects on fuel and water.
Blood is just another fluid and the effects can help the body work more
effectively as shown by the anecdotal results.
It's no good saying it can't possibly work, it does.

Best wishes

John
Marvellousmagnets.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

In a message dated 15/12/2007 17:29:32 GMT Standard Time,
com1@... writes:

>>>>>>>What has been found in the Southern  Hemisphere is that the etheric
body’s
chakras rotate in a different  gear-like direction for a 1st generation born
there and vica versa Nothern  hemishpere. Everything else is the exactly the
same physically.
However, it is interesting to note that there is no MS in the  equatorial
zone – unless its symptoms have been brought on by amalgam  galvanic
reactions. So basically the liver which is responsible for making  6 enzymes
that support the myelin and arachnoid sheathing never seems to go  into
stress in that magnet zone – the bloch wall area of the Mother  planet.>>>>>>>




Again, I think we are talking about a different property of  magnets.
I use magnets for fuel economy, water treatment and health.    They do not
require any knowledge of meridians, chakras or subtle energy fields  to apply
and use.  I believe that multipolar applications work better  than unipolar
applications and anecdotal evidence seems to support  that.   I can recommend
these as a self-help therapy as I have  not heard of anyone being harmed by
these
applications.   Looking  at the scientific studies, not one suggests any
harmful effects, they either  help people or have no effect.

I accept that you are working in a different aspect of magnet therapy,  using
subtle fields, chakras and energy flow through meridians.   You  are using a
perception, training and skill that I do not have and am unlikely to  aquire.

But I still get people thanking me for putting a magnotherapy wristband on
their wrists.   They tell me it has changed their lives.   I  am quite certain,
from experience and from working with other fluids, that the  multipole
approach is more effective for the way I use magnets and will continue  to use
it.

I accept that you are seeing effects that could be harmful, but that may be
part of the reason why our applications of magnotherapy are so  effective.

Here is an analogy that might show what I mean.
Think of an immune system problem, we can either solve the problem, or
stimulate the system to solve it itself, perhaps by giving the person a small 
dose
of what is causing the problem.
Like vaccination or homeopathy.
I do not know if this is what is happening, but I do know that you see
potential problems in multipolar techniques and I see positive advantages.
Perhaps the potential problems are needed as part of the positive  advantages.

Best wishes
John
Marvellousmagnets.com






[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

What has been found in the Southern Hemisphere is that the etheric body’s
chakras rotate in a different gear-like direction for a 1st generation born
there and vica versa Nothern hemishpere. Everything else is the exactly the
same physically.



However, it is interesting to note that there is no MS in the equatorial
zone – unless its symptoms have been brought on by amalgam galvanic
reactions. So basically the liver which is responsible for making 6 enzymes
that support the myelin and arachnoid sheathing never seems to go into
stress in that magnet zone – the bloch wall area of the Mother planet.



Peter



From: magnotherapy@yahoogroups.com [mailto:magnotherapy@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of JBainSI@...
Sent: Saturday, December 15, 2007 12:15 PM
To: magnotherapy@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [magnotherapy] Torn Cartilage in Knee




In a message dated 15/12/2007 07:07:48 GMT Standard Time,
com1@... <mailto:com1%40magnetfoundation.org>  writes:

>>>>The application is the use of
single pole fields, bipolar fields (both Negative and Positive) and
Multi-polar (multiple fields of Negative and Positive within the same
therapy pad). There are no monopole fields in 3 dimensional reality - just
single pole therapies.

But the only difference between a single pole field and a bipolar field is
alignment. In the single pole field the other pole is sitting behind the
single pole instead of beside it as in the bipolar field.

I am starting to think that the energy field approach uses a function of
magnets other than the normal magnetic field. Perhaps a subtle energy field
that is masked by the magnetic field and where poles make a difference, yet
living in a southern continent is not harmful.

Best wishes
John
Marvellousmagnets.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

In a message dated 15/12/2007 17:21:29 GMT Standard Time,
com1@... writes:

>>>>>The
voltage and cellular microscopic   including all of the science of the cell's
parallel capacitance, capillary  beds & cytoplasm,  metabolic function,
immune functions,  oxidoreductase ATP only supports the supplemental support
of the human  Negative Zeta potential - not Positive multipolar fields.
Sorry. Or please  send me to the new science that overrides this known
physiology - I am  totally open.



No new science, just the simple physics and chemistry of magnetic fields on
fluid flow.
Compare it with the effects on fuel and water.
Blood is just another fluid and the effects can help the body work more
effectively as shown by the anecdotal results.
It's no good saying it can't possibly work, it does.

Best wishes

John
Marvellousmagnets.com






[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

You would indicate that using the multipolar fields are a different approach
- yes they are. Whenever you actually test multipolar fields, you get an
aggregate of Positive because Positive is an expanding field; Negative is a
contracting field and when tested, the multipolar designs test  7 to 14%
positive over the flux gradient of the magnetic material. That means that
you are using an aggregate of Positive to support healing when the body
distinctly uses Negative to heal - whereas the Positive is its Stress Signal
Messenger to send Negative energy to the traumatized, stressed site. Go
figure - why would the body want electromotive stress instead of calming
naturally amplified healing energy - the human Zeta potential energy. The
voltage and cellular microscopic  including all of the science of the cell's
parallel capacitance, capillary beds & cytoplasm,  metabolic function,
immune functions, oxidoreductase ATP only supports the supplemental support
of the human Negative Zeta potential - not Positive multipolar fields.
Sorry. Or please send me to the new science that overrides this known
physiology - I am totally open.



Peter Kulish

From: magnotherapy@yahoogroups.com [mailto:magnotherapy@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of JBainSI@...
Sent: Saturday, December 15, 2007 11:53 AM
To: magnotherapy@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [magnotherapy] Torn Cartilage in Knee



In a message dated 15/12/2007 07:07:25 GMT Standard Time,
com1@... <mailto:com1%40magnetfoundation.org>  writes:

>>>>>There is no secret to the way magnetic fields work in biology. >>>>>

Not talking about secrets, just multiple mechanisms. The energy field
approach you favour is just one approach to healing. The effects of a
magnetic
field on fluid flow is a totally different subject, but it also has health
implications when that fluid is blood. The effect of magnetic fields on cell

dynamics is another subject and nothing to do with subtle energy fields


>>>>>It must be realized and it should be NOW - Oxidative stress occurs with

the
Positive field of magnet unless it is contained in a specific regeneration
circuit. As indicated by microscopy, oxidative stress sites are neutralized
and heal quickly with the Negative field. Free radicals are Positive and are
neutralized by Negative Zeta potential. Positive supports Free Radicals and
also is the supporting energy for acidity and positive cells known as
cancer. See Pub Med Research for the quick understanding of Positive and
Negative energies on cancer cells..
So unless the field is contained and or is specifically being subjected to
Negative energy potential to overcome its stress factor, the Positive field
should not be introduced into the physiology in the form of Bi or Multipolar
fields. It goes against the bioscience of how the electromotive energies
exist in the body and cells. Put Positive in the body and watch the rouleau
pattern occur in the blood. Take the rouleau and put negative energy into
the body and the rouleau disappears - the cells separate and start to
transfer efficiently. So where, except during circuit healing, does the
Positive have a place in practice.>>>>>

In the fact that three of the main magnotherapy device manufacturers all use

multipole techniques effectively. If it was harmful or less effective,
that would show up in the results. It doesn't.

And as yet I have seen no valid scientific studies showing that unipolar
techniques are more effective than multipolar techniques in treating
patients.
And Vice versa of course. If you know of any, I would love to read them

John
Marvellousmagnets.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

In a message dated 15/12/2007 07:07:48 GMT Standard Time,
com1@... writes:

>>>>The application is the use of
single pole fields,  bipolar fields (both Negative and Positive) and
Multi-polar (multiple  fields of Negative and Positive within the same
therapy pad). There are no  monopole fields in 3 dimensional reality - just
single pole  therapies.



But the only difference between a single pole field and a bipolar field is
alignment.   In the single pole field the other pole is sitting behind  the
single pole  instead of beside it as in the bipolar field.

I am starting to think that the energy field approach uses a function of
magnets other than the normal magnetic field.   Perhaps a subtle  energy field
that is masked by the magnetic field and where poles make a  difference, yet
living in a southern continent is not harmful.

Best wishes
John
Marvellousmagnets.com






[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]