I believe it is found that the electromotive forces, when correctly
introduced, expedite the traumatized cells to return to normal by
accelerating the correct [negative calming/contractive] voltage to reduce
the Positive charged inflammation and re-stabilize the metabolic functions
including transfer efficiencies. This seems so apparent especially when
reviewing the research even at my site
http://www.biomagscience.net/magnet-therapy/foundation-magnetic-science-rese
arch .





Peter Kulish, Founder

Director of Science

www.BiomagScience.net







From: magnotherapy@yahoogroups.com [mailto:magnotherapy@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of JBainSI@...
Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 3:05 PM
To: magnotherapy@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [magnotherapy] MagnaBlock - Quadblock




In a message dated 09/03/2009 18:32:44 GMT Standard Time,
subluxation@... <mailto:subluxation%40tds.net> writes:

>>>>>I have seen a set of 4 magnets with alternating polarities being
researched by neurologists at Vanderbilt. This seems to go against the
simple
directions of placing the negative pole of a magnet against the site of
pain.....and yet, personal experience seems to indicate they both work. What
are your
thoughts regarding this?

Yep, they both work, and the only studies suggesting one is more effective
than the other are from Vanderbilt who found that the multipole magnets were

more effective on tissue than the single pole magnets. But that was in the
lab, not in real life.

Judging from instructions posted here, the multipole magnets are easier to
use, just put 'em on and reap the benefits.
The single pole magnets need to be carefully positioned on acupuncture
points it would seem.

Bear in mind that the mechanism behind magnotherapy is still not proven,
lots of different theories, some very odd.

best wishes

John
sound-ideas.info


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]