JBainSI@aolcom



It is not my responsibility to cite studies. Simply the science is Positive
energy acid, negative energy alkaline. I ask where are the multipolar tests
and case studies that show increasing Negative (not positive) Zeta potential
has immediately started resolution of 15-25 year term CFS fibro or
regeneration of missing nerves or awoken out of comas or photomicrographs of
free radical sites neutralized and gone within 10 hours or the blood rouleau
associations breaking up into healthy transfer statis or cellular membrane
or cytoplasm voltage increases. Why aren't these same types of tests
available with the multipolar Positive aggregate fields? Why so many people
complain after the first week or so that the multipolar systems don't work?




Another question is why are there warnings to not use the multipolar magnets
on glands or organs or cancer.



Why does an area that has been just traumatized suddenly flood with natural
negative energy??



Please, could you answer these questions about the multipole systems.



Peter





From: magnotherapy@yahoogroups.com [mailto:magnotherapy@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of JBainSI@...
Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2008 4:53 PM
To: magnotherapy@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [magnotherapy] Re: From where to buy Magnets




In a message dated 27/07/2008 21:24:12 GMT Daylight Time,
com1@... <mailto:com1%40magnetfoundation.org> writes:

>>>>>Medline and a number of other sources has published that negative has
shown
a reduction of cancer cells and positive increases cancer cells. This has
been found by many researchers and that positive is the energy of stress.

>>>>>

CItes please, I haven't seen these studies and I have over 700 on file.
I have seen references to unpublished studies, but of course, they do not
count.

>>>>>>Take your gauss meter and measure your multipolar system and see what
the
aggregate energy is.
>>>>>>

Aggregate energy is not as important as field gradient.
It's not the speed that kills you, it's the rate of change of speed when you

hit the immoveable object.
In my opinion, of course.

Best Wishes

John
MarvellousMagnets.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]