In a message dated 16/12/2007 09:46:47 GMT Standard Time,
com1@... writes:


>>>>>Listen. I am not here to burst bubbles - only to lend some science.
When you
mention other fluids such as water, you are also talking about using the
proper magnetic field to burst the cages from nucleating before forming
crystalline structures such as scale and creating enough millivoltage to
attract and re-absorb (hydrate) the existing scale - literally potentiating
the fluid in a positive manner over that of the original negative
millivoltage present in hardwater. When you reduce the functioning
electromotive field by a bi or multipolar treatment, the functional acting
voltage is reduced considerably. >>>>>>



Holcomb's work at Vanderbilt University indicates the the end result is
increased, that multipole treatments are more effective. This doesn't mean
you
are wrong, merely that mechanism is not fully understood yet.
Effects of Steady Magnetic Fields on Action Potentials of Sensory Neurons in
Vitro
Michael J. McLean, M.D., Ph.D., Robert R. Holcomb, M.D., Ph.D., Artur W.
Wamil, M.D., Ph.D., Joel D. Pickett, M.D.
Environmental Medicine, Volume 8, No.2. 36-45, 1991.

>>>>>It is fine to use either pole on fuel, but the engineers who do para to
ortho stoichiometry take it a lot further than that to get the proper
results. This also includes doing harmonic balancing of the potentials.
>>>>>





Yup, but a multipolar approach seems to work consistently enough for anyone
to fit and use.




>>>>>In relationship to using an aggregate Positive field on tissue, it is
good
for increasing inter and intra fluids - especially important when separating
vertebrae. All positive fields should be supported by Negative surrounding
energies to prevent any precursors from activating. >>>>



Perhaps that is the secret, some multipole designs do just that.


best wishes
John
Marvellousmagnets.com






[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]