You would indicate that using the multipolar fields are a different approach
- yes they are. Whenever you actually test multipolar fields, you get an
aggregate of Positive because Positive is an expanding field; Negative is a
contracting field and when tested, the multipolar designs test 7 to 14%
positive over the flux gradient of the magnetic material. That means that
you are using an aggregate of Positive to support healing when the body
distinctly uses Negative to heal - whereas the Positive is its Stress Signal
Messenger to send Negative energy to the traumatized, stressed site. Go
figure - why would the body want electromotive stress instead of calming
naturally amplified healing energy - the human Zeta potential energy. The
voltage and cellular microscopic including all of the science of the cell's
parallel capacitance, capillary beds & cytoplasm, metabolic function,
immune functions, oxidoreductase ATP only supports the supplemental support
of the human Negative Zeta potential - not Positive multipolar fields.
Sorry. Or please send me to the new science that overrides this known
physiology - I am totally open.



Peter Kulish

From: magnotherapy@yahoogroups.com [mailto:magnotherapy@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of JBainSI@...
Sent: Saturday, December 15, 2007 11:53 AM
To: magnotherapy@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [magnotherapy] Torn Cartilage in Knee



In a message dated 15/12/2007 07:07:25 GMT Standard Time,
com1@... <mailto:com1%40magnetfoundation.org> writes:

>>>>>There is no secret to the way magnetic fields work in biology. >>>>>

Not talking about secrets, just multiple mechanisms. The energy field
approach you favour is just one approach to healing. The effects of a
magnetic
field on fluid flow is a totally different subject, but it also has health
implications when that fluid is blood. The effect of magnetic fields on cell

dynamics is another subject and nothing to do with subtle energy fields


>>>>>It must be realized and it should be NOW - Oxidative stress occurs with

the
Positive field of magnet unless it is contained in a specific regeneration
circuit. As indicated by microscopy, oxidative stress sites are neutralized
and heal quickly with the Negative field. Free radicals are Positive and are
neutralized by Negative Zeta potential. Positive supports Free Radicals and
also is the supporting energy for acidity and positive cells known as
cancer. See Pub Med Research for the quick understanding of Positive and
Negative energies on cancer cells..
So unless the field is contained and or is specifically being subjected to
Negative energy potential to overcome its stress factor, the Positive field
should not be introduced into the physiology in the form of Bi or Multipolar
fields. It goes against the bioscience of how the electromotive energies
exist in the body and cells. Put Positive in the body and watch the rouleau
pattern occur in the blood. Take the rouleau and put negative energy into
the body and the rouleau disappears - the cells separate and start to
transfer efficiently. So where, except during circuit healing, does the
Positive have a place in practice.>>>>>

In the fact that three of the main magnotherapy device manufacturers all use

multipole techniques effectively. If it was harmful or less effective,
that would show up in the results. It doesn't.

And as yet I have seen no valid scientific studies showing that unipolar
techniques are more effective than multipolar techniques in treating
patients.
And Vice versa of course. If you know of any, I would love to read them

John
Marvellousmagnets.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]