Marci,

I am not sure if you know what forum you are on but this is salt/c and
people here HAVE gotten rid of their Lyme with it and last I checked
it was an alternative treatment.

Olive


--- In lymestrategies@yahoogroups.com, Woodi16@... wrote:
>
>
> I'd say that your chiropractor is a wise man. I've had Lyme for sure
since
> 1990 and probably a lot longer, and I've never really known anyone
that
> eradicated Lyme with alternative treatments. Most people that I know
that have gone
> the alternative route eventually give in and use abx to get better.
I think
> alternative treatments have their place and are best used in
conjunction
> with abx.
>
> When I was first diagnosed and treated 9 months later, I was only
given 3
> weeks of antibiotics, which helped quite a bit, but not enough. I
pushed myself
> into a remission and relapsed 3 1/2 years later. Had I taken a
longer course
> of abx in the first place, I probably would have nipped the
infection at that
> time instead of going on to become a chronic case.
>
> Marci
>
> In a message dated 8/1/2006 7:48:36 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,
> baker_horace@... writes:
>
> I've been on the Salt/C protocol for almost 5 weeks now, am up to 8
> grams. I had a rash appear about 10 d
ays before I started the
> protocol, which immediately freaked out my wife, who has had Lyme
> several times. The rash grew, and there were other spots popping up,
> but now the rashes are all but gone. I have not had symtoms that I
> know of other than herxing, which is continuous.
>
> My question: Did I start the Salt/C early enough to "get ahead" of
> the progression of Lyme?
>
> When I showed the rash to my Chiropracter, who also fancies himself an
> alternative medicine expert, he said that I should do doxycycline
> right away. I asked about alternatives, and he said that there were
> no alternatives for Lyme that worked, "believe me I would know if
> there were". Well, I don't believe him, and it infuriates me to think
> that I might have to cave in and suckle at the teat of the
> pharmacutical companies. But I also don't want to be stubborn to the
> point of stupidity, therefore my question.
>