Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
icanofbuffalo · ICAN of Buffalo
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Real people. Real stories. See how Yahoo! Groups impacts members worldwide.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Oops, here's the article...   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #23 of 524 |
The Wall Street Journal
7/12/2006 – P. D1

THE INFORMED PATIENT

By LAURA LANDRO

New Practices Reduce Childbirth Risks

Amid Soaring Liability Costs, Hospitals Curb Use of Drugs And Other
Procedures to Speed Labor

Hospitals are conceiving new programs to make childbirth safer, amid
mounting evidence that overuse of labor-inducing drugs for preterm
deliveries and other common practices in the delivery room are endangering
both mothers and infants.

Driven by soaring liability-insurance premiums for their obstetrics units,
hospital groups are adopting policies to discourage or prohibit births
induced before the minimum 39 weeks recommended by maternal and child health
experts, unless medically necessary. They are curtailing the use of drugs
such as the hormone oxytocin to start or speed up contractions, which in
too-high doses can lead to ruptures of the uterus, fetal distress and even
death of the infant. And they are limiting the use of forceps and vacuums
that can help coax babies from the birth canal but also lead to injuries
such as bone fractures and nerve damage.

With communication breakdowns at the root of 85% of all adverse events
reported in obstetrics units, hospitals are also taking steps to ensure
better teamwork, such as making sure electronic fetal monitors that trace
baby's heartbeats are interpreted the same way by both doctors and nurses.

Despite the sharp rise in elective inductions in recent years, which may
account for a third or more of all induced births in some hospitals,
research shows that delivering babies even a few days early is associated
with higher rates of emergency Caesarean deliveries, admissions to the
neonatal intensive-care unit with respiratory distress and other problems,
and longer-term health issues for children.

The new programs are already changing the experience of childbirth in a
growing number of hospitals around the country -- making it harder to
schedule deliveries on a convenient day for the doctor or patient, or to
give the maximum dose of oxytocin to advance a long and difficult labor. But
they are also helping to reduce risks that can lead to devastating harm.
Salt Lake City-based Intermountain Healthcare began requiring doctors to
obtain special permission to induce delivery earlier than 39 weeks.
Intermountain, which operates hospitals in Utah and Idaho, reduced elective
inductions at less than 39 weeks to 5% of all births today, from 27% before
the program started in 2001.

"The OB is its own little world in a hospital setting, and 99% of the time
it's a happy and nice place," says Kathy Connolly, assistant vice president
of risk management at the insurance-management unit of Premier Inc., an
alliance of 1,500 nonprofit hospitals. But obstetricians don't always adhere
to guidelines for elective induction set by groups like the American College
of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. They often schedule deliveries around
their own office hours or travel plans, and don't always take the time to
document care in patient records, increasing hospital liability, she says.

While harm during labor and delivery is rare, relative to the number of
births, obstetrics-related cases accounted for 8.1% of all
physician-malpractice payment reports to the National Practitioner Data
Bank, a federally maintained clearinghouse that maintains data on physician
conduct. The median award for a childbirth-related claim involving hospitals
and obstetricians was $2.5 million between 1997 and 2003, the highest of any
specialty.

The nonprofit Institute for Healthcare Improvement is now expanding a
program it launched last year with hospitals affiliated with Premier and
Ascension Health, the largest Catholic health system, called "Idealized
Design of Perinatal Care." It offers two "bundles" of practices -- one to be
used during a decision to electively induce, and one for managing labor that
isn't progressing -- which include determining fetal age, monitoring the
fetal heart rate, and assessing the readiness of the mother's cervix. While
hospitals have long followed such practices to improve outcomes in
childbirth, IHI says the key is using all the practices in concert more
consistently than many hospitals do.

Managed-care giant Kaiser Permanente, with 32 hospitals, is rolling out its
own perinatal patient safety program in its eight national regions,
including drills of simulated maternal and fetal emergencies. Doctors and
nurses who undergo the new training program interact with specially designed
mannequins implanted with a mechanical baby. "Emergencies are rare events in
labor and delivery, so it's hard to keep your skills up," says Annie Herlik,
Kaiser Permanente director of national risk management.

One of the biggest challenges is reconciling two different sets of terms
that nurses and doctors have long used to read fetal heart monitors,
developed by their respective professional organizations. Nurses for
example, used the term "decreased/minimal" to mean zero to five beats per
minute, while to doctors, the same term means three to five beats per
minute. The differences have lead to miscommunication about when a baby
might be in distress -- and created big liability risks for hospitals.

A new, single set of guidelines was published eight years ago by the
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, but doctors and
nurses often fall back on habits they were trained in. Many hospitals are
now requiring nurses and doctors to learn the newer guidelines together;
Kaiser, for example, is using 20-minute videos that introduce the common
language.

Hospitals also are educating mothers-to-be about the risks of early
induction, which both mothers and doctors sometimes push for. At
Premier-affiliated Baystate Medical Center in Springfield, Mass, for
example, staffers conduct informed-consent discussions about oxytocin at the
hospital instead of leaving it to a doctor's office visit.

Oxytocin is a hormone released during labor that causes contractions of the
uterus. The most common brand name is Pitocin, which is a synthetic version.
It's often used to speed or jump-start labor, but if the contractions become
too strong and frequent, the uterus becomes "hyperstimulated," which may
cause tearing and slow the supply of blood and oxygen to the fetus. Though
there are no precise statistics on its use, IHI says reviews of
medical-malpractice claims show oxytocin is involved in more than 50% of
situations leading to birth trauma.

"Pitocin is used like candy in the OB world, and that's one of the reasons
for medical and legal risk," says Carla Provost, assistant vice president at
Baystate, who notes that in many hospitals it is common practice to "pit to
distress" -- or use the maximum dose of Pitocin to stimulate contractions.

Some hospitals in the IHI program are already meeting or exceeding the
target of reducing rates of harm to infants below 3.3 incidents per 1,000
births, compared with a national average of 6.34. At the eight-hospital
Seton Health Network, part of the Ascension system, birth-trauma rates have
fallen to nearly zero from about three per thousand, and doctors are using
vacuums and forceps just 4% of the time, compared with 7.5% before the
program's launch in January of 2004, says Frank Mazza, vice president of
medical affairs for Seton, based in Austin, Texas.

Intermountain Healthcare says its program has led to a sharp drop in birth
complications and decreased the lengths of stay in labor and delivery,
cutting costs by $500,000 annually. However, the new efforts are meeting
some resistance from obstetricians, who aren't used to having their wings
clipped. "It has been hard to get doctors to go along because they don't
necessarily believe the risks," says Ware Branch, who heads Intermountain's
39-weeks-gestation program.

Gary Hankins, professor at the University of Texas Medical Branch at
Galveston and chairman of the practice committee of ACOG, says doctors can
cite hospital policies in declining to do preterm elective deliveries, which
are sometimes requested by mothers tired of being pregnant. Elective
inductions are "a real life dilemma" for doctors, he says.

LABOR ISSUES

The top six contributors to obstetrics litigation:

• Failure to recognize fetal distress

• Failure to perform timely Caesarean birth

• Failure to properly resuscitate depressed baby

• Inappropriate use of labor-inducing drugs

• Inappropriate use of vacuum/forceps

• Failure to communicate

Source: Premier Inc. (from industry data)

• Email me at informedpatient@wsj.com1 <informedpatient%40wsj.com1>

URL for this article:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB115266494103204113.html


Fri Jul 14, 2006 10:55 pm

icanofbuffal...
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #23 of 524 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

The Wall Street Journal 7/12/2006 – P. D1 THE INFORMED PATIENT By LAURA LANDRO New Practices Reduce Childbirth Risks Amid Soaring Liability Costs,...
rzeller143@...
icanofbuffal...
Offline Send Email
Jul 14, 2006
11:09 pm
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help