GOOD VS EVIL
Let's Consider that goodness, growth, and being kind to one another,
is a superior force over the force of destruction, death, and being
mean to each other. (To do this, we consider all possibilities)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Let's consider a universe with only the force of destruction. As
death /destruction progress, they take whatever is alive, and kill
it, so that where life once was, now exists (is produced) nothing
and nothingness. Ashes to ashes, and dust to dust. Pretty soon, life
becomes scarce, while a whole lot of empty space and inanimate
material is left behind. After awhile, all the life is killed, and
then what? With no life left to kill, the force of destruction comes
to a stop (no more destroying can be done), because from nothing,
this force can go no further from there. Here is a definite bottom
to the universe.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Now
consider the force of good-and-growth as being the only force
around. As this force acts, it takes nothingness/lifeless matter
(dust), and creates life in its place. Soon everything starts to
come alive. Pretty soon we begin to run out of improvements to make.
Emptiness and undeveloped raw material (dust) starts to come into
short supply. If everything is alive, then no more growth can be
done, and thus the force of good is stopped, right? Well, there's
not so much an absolute ceiling, as there is an absolute bottom. You
see, life forms can advance/be advanced and become ever more capable
and alive; and this thus continues the force of growth/goodness.
And, a universe that is alive (full of life), is very capable -able
to do lots of things, (unlike a barren universe consisting of
nothingness). And with that life/capability, it can bridge barriers
and reach raw material (dust) that had previously been separated
from it by a barrier. Hence, the force of goodness and growth can
survive by itself much better than the force of destruction/death
can. xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
ALSO, it takes life-and-capability to do or be either the force of
good-and-growth, or the force of destruction. The lack of life can't
do/be either force. Since what the force of good produces is life,
such life can continue to do forces. But since what the force of
destruction produces is death, nothingness, voids in life; since
this cannot do or support either force, then the force of
destruction alone is destined to a quick end while the force of good
and growth alone is destined to continue.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ALSO,
since only life can do-be either force: When destruction experiences
what it produces, or is applied to itself, it doesn't grow, but
instead shrinks to nothing. xxxxxxxxxx But when goodness experiences
what it produces, (when goodness is good to itself) it does not die,
but instead, grows. So that the force of destruction needs something
other than just itself to exist (is a parasitic force), while the
force of good does not and is self sufficient with just itself. So
that when alone, good survives while destruction self eliminates and
vanishes. From this we can see that good and growth, is a superior
force to the force of death and destruction.

REPRODUCTION
Consider the concept of supply and demand; as applied to human
beings. If there is a shortage of humans, then they will have a
higher value and will be treated better. But if there is a surplus
of humans, then their value will be low, and they will be treated
poorly, according to their low value according to supply and
demand. So that when women are considering how many humans to
produce in terms of how large a family to have; collectively, they
have quite an impact on how we all are treated by those economic
forces that rule over us all.
And then there is the conservative, religious rules over our
sexuality. But first let us consider sexual reproduction in
itself. Sexual reproduction produces offspring that are not exact
copies of their parents, but who are different from their parents to
some degree. So, sexual reproduction generates differences between
each of us. Now, if we were all to have sex with each other in
unrestricted sexual reproduction, then those differences would be
spread all back among our population and we would not build on or
accentuate those differences. But that's not the way sexual
reproduction works in our world. Sexual reproduction is restricted
to one man one woman and to form a family grouping to raise the
offspring produced. So that the differences generated by sexual
reproduction are preserved and compounded over each successive
generation; so that different groups of people are developed each
being good in one particular area, while not so good in the other
areas. So that as individuals they cannot function well, but only
as a group can they work together to combine their good areas to
make a complete and competent societal whole. Thus the rulers of a
society have at their beck and call, all the humans of the society
to do their bidding, because as individuals they are all unbalanced
in their skills, incapable of being self sufficient as individuals,
who can only survive and excel by joining as a group each to
contribute their best skill. So that what the conservative rules
over our sexual reproduction do is to breed individuals who are
slaves who are easily molded by the rulers of a society, who are
incapable of much independence as individuals, so that we are more
so a commodity to be used by those who rule over us. Sometimes one
may resent being part of this conservative religious breeding
program that has made us to be not free, but slaves to those who
rule over us.
TO CONTINUE THIS DISCUSSION, SEE
httpcolondoublebackslashwwwdotgeocitiesdotcom/feelosofree/ok.html