Thank you Drs. Tee Guidotti and Gabor Lantos. I guess the same concept
should apply to other public health professionals when dealing with
controversial topics in the public interest.

Sincerely,

Andrew Cutz
______________________________________________________
Andrew Cutz, CIH
Moderator, GlobalOccHyg List
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/globalocchyg-list/


WITH REFERENCE TO...
-----Original Message-----
From: Tee Guidotti [mailto:eohtlg@...]
Sent: Friday, February 02, 2007 2:10 PM
To: occ-env-med-l@...
Subject: Re: [occ-env-med-l] [WFDRoundtable] Help defend science from
politics

Yes, but there is a Canadian model that may apply.

Almost 15 years ago, Warren Bell, Trevor Hancock and I formed the
Canadian Association of Physicians for the Environment, which has since
become the most influential organization of its kind in the country. The
basic idea at the time and for several years was to bring the scientists
and content experts together with advocates and activities in an
advocacy organization, so that the content experts could effectively
coach the advocacy and the advocates could be better activists.

Scientists are very reluctant to express opinions and extrapolations
through their professional societies because they fear compromising a
channel of communication that is trusted to be objective.

The idea was that in a professional society they had to be 95% certain
(scientific standard of confidence) and apolitical, but in a parallel
advocacy organization they could be >50% certain (weight of evidence) or
precautionary and as political as they wanted to be.

The trick was simply not to mix the two.

I don't think that CAPE has adhered to this model rigidly in recent
years but it got us started very nicely.

TLG


>>> "Gabor Lantos" <glantos@...> 1/31/2007 11:05 PM >>>

Terrific idea. This situation applies equally to Canada.


Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 10:57:07 -0500
Subject: [WFDRoundtable] Help defend science from politics
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scientists as a group are generally politically inert -- more prone to make
observations than to engage in social action. I'm one of them. But now many
of
the country's most prestigious scientists have decided to speak out in
concert.
And I just signed the same petition they did.

In the last few years, many members of the US scientific community have been
increasingly worried by an unprecedented pattern of remarkably overt
political
interference in a very wide array of scientific/technica l programs,
studies, and
reports on issues ranging from coal mine wastes to drug abuse, from air and
water pollution to agricultural practices and wildlife preservation, from
climate change to family planning, and so on.

At a level never seen before, scientific advisory panels are being stacked
with
idealogues who have weak expertise; research agendas are being distorted;
scientific reports are being edited or deep-sixed by political appointees.
To me
this is not just a short-lived political problem -- it undermines a largely
unspoken American social agreement that public decision-making should rest
on a
rational foundation of "the facts". Instead, it leaves the whole country at
the
mercy of powerful people, however wise, misguided, or idiotic their
preferences may be.

The behavior of the White House on these issues is part of a pattern that
has
led Russell Train, the EPA administrator under Presidents Nixon and Ford, to
observe, "How radically we have moved away from regulation based on
independent
findings and professional analysis of scientific, health and economic data
by
the responsible agency to regulation controlled by the White House and
driven
primarily by political considerations. "

The Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS) has put together an "A to Z Guide to
Political Interference in Science" that describes what has been going on.
http://www.ucsusa. org/scientific_integrity/
interference/a-to-z-guide-to-political.html [ONE STRING]

The UCS also has developed two statements/petitions, one for scientists
(including physicians) to sign, the other for non- scientists, that call for
efforts to restore and protect the integrity of the scientific process, now
and
in the future. I just signed the one for scientists.

The Union of Concerned Scientists' petition is a scientist statement on
scientific integrity that speaks out against the misuse of science and calls
for
reforms to improve the way in which science informs government
decision-making.
Thus far, more than 8,000 scientists, including almost fifty Nobel
Laureates, 62
recipients of the National Medal of Science, and 150+ members of the
National
Academies have signed the statement. Statement signers also have
the opportunity to choose to keep informed about this issue through periodic
emails from UCS.

You can review the statement and sign it online at
http://www.ucsusa. org/scientific_integrity/
interference/scientists-signon-statement.html

The Scientific Integrity Program works to identify ways in which scientists,
engineers, and health professionals can act to defend science. To that end,
special services are available to scientists who sign the statement to
improve their effectiveness, such as issue briefings, media and advocacy
skills workshops, and opportunities to coordinate activities with other
scientists in their area. The program also provides thorough and accurate
educational materials on scientific integrity issues that scientists can use
with students, reporters, policymakers, and the general public.

For more information about the program, visit
http://www.ucsusa. org/scientific_integrity/

To sign the scientist statement, visit
http://www.ucsusa.org/scientific_
integrity/interference/scientists-signon-statement.html

Follow this link to sign up:
http://ucsaction.org/ucsaction3/join.html? rk=Z1e1vUEzpL%2dt [ONE STRING]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------\
---------------------------------------------
END Forwarded by Andrew Cutz, CIH (Friday, February 2, 2007)







---
Please remove this footer before replying to the forum.
Today's Sponsor: Integritas (http://www.integritas.com), makers of STIX
Software for Occupational Health & Safety, and Workers' Compensation
managed care.

You are currently subscribed to Occ-Env-Med-L, a free announcement tool
for Occupational & Environmental Medicine.
The forum originated at Duke Univ., & is now managed at Univ.
N.Carolina
Your subscription is sent to: eohtlg@...
To send a message to our entire community, please address it to
Occ-Env-Med-L@...
To unsubscribe send a blank email to
leave-14398286-6853903J@...