Your encouraging opinion is much appreciated. It has been a
long process -- beginning with the Millers' verbiage about lawsuits
in December 2003, and then their filing of the lawsuit in May 2004
against so many co-defendants, and now continuing.

We have many positive things in our lives to balance this out -- for
which we are very grateful -- and are prepared and quite willing to
go to trial if that's what needs to happen.

By the way, there won't be a decision on the Motion for Summary
Judgment right away, as the attorney for the Millers et al received
a 3-week extension to reply.

Enjoy the weekend!
Judy


--- In gentlewindvictims@yahoogroups.com, "Carl Starrett" <chs@c...>
wrote:
> Even if some of the claims survive summary judgment, I doubt they
> enought evidence for a judge to let this case to a jury. Of
course
> stranger things have happened like the filing of this lawsuit to
begin
> with. I doubt a federal jury would take much to find in your
favor.
>
> --- In gentlewindvictims@yahoogroups.com, "jfbergin"
<jfbergin@y...>
> wrote:
> > We have completed the "discovery" phase in the gwp lawsuit. This
> > included depositions (questioning, under oath), in respective
> > attorneys' offices, of the gwp plaintiffs and us. John Miller,
> > Mary Miller and Pam Ranheim were each deposed on separate days
by
> > our attorney. Shelly Miller and Joan Carreiro were half days.
And
> > Carol Miller was deposed for a shorter time period. Our attorney
> > also deposed a non-plaintiff who has been a long-time
> > gwp "instrument keeper"/staff person.