Having problems with message search?
Thanks for the information. Sorry for a late reply. What you have mentioned IS the only thing which make sense i.e "someone stands up in the conference and sells their product ". I will change my course of action and will go with DMSA /ALA/ DMPS
instead of NDF. NDF is north american product and it has more marketing impact in this area.
I got rid of several severe headaches by extracting worn out teeths and by replacing amalgam fillings. I do have other symptoms
which is the indication ( I hope ) of HG in my body and in some part of my brain.
Thanks
Nadeem
Canada
----- Original Message -----
From: ElspethGuyanSent: Friday, May 21, 2004 12:28 PMSubject: Re: [frequent-dose-chelation] DAMS: NDFFrom my experience I would say that dmsa + dmps are stronger and therefore more effective at bonding with mercury. Dmps is the stronger of the two. But as I said what suits one doesn't necessarily suit another.I don't know anything about DAMS. My impression of a lot of specialists go with the latest theory. Someone stands up at a conference and "sells" their product as the one which avoids all the pitfalls of all the other products and people accept it as being the way ahead. Until you have tried it you don't know for sure.The other feeling I get is that some specialists get experience with something and then they stick to it. They seem to buy into the notion that everything else is unsafe and their treatment is the only safe one. Maybe they set up business deals for the bulk buying of a given product - that's just a theory. The truth is probably that nothing is absolutely safe when you are trying to chelate. All you can do is try them out and see what suits you.I personally tried dmsa first and maybe that's the best route. It's a lot cheaper and doesn't seem to cause allergic reactions. My impression is that NDF is the weakest bond with mercury of the three.Elspeth----- Original Message -----From: nadeemSent: Friday, May 21, 2004 1:07 PMSubject: Re: [frequent-dose-chelation] DAMS: NDFThanks for your response.Which one is the better route to go ?NDF orDMSA / DMPS and ALAAssuming their is no problem with Anti-fungal.DAMS is a non-profit organisation. Is their any biased reason for them to be supportive of NDF over DMSA / DMPS ?NDF does not deplete body from minerals (as per their company) which is not true for DMSA / DMPS.Is DMSA / DMPS more widely used / accepted over NDF because it has been in the market for longer period of time ?No doubt ( I think) both works but which is more effevtive ? assumping their is no side effects from consuming anyoneof those.Any Idea / Feedback / past experience will be helpfull for everybody in making the sound judgement.Thanks----- Original Message -----From: ElspethGuyanSent: Thursday, May 20, 2004 12:26 PMSubject: Re: [frequent-dose-chelation] DAMS: NDFNDF includes probiotics which I can't tolerate. I tried NDF, spent a fortune (about £80) on one bottle and was only able to take a few drops. It was a complete waste of money. I know it was the probiotics that was the problem as I have exactly the same symptoms with every anti-fungal over the last 20 years. It gives me a feeling I can't stand- a feeling of complete misery.If you can tolerate anti-fungals it is worth a try. It excretes mercury via the bladder. I definitely had a stronger sensation of pressure in my bladder after I used it. So no doubt some mercury was getting redeposited on the way out.Don't forget every organisation or specialist has their own theories as to what is best. They all disagree with each other. Different things seem to suit different people. Most things are probably worth trying once in cautious doses.Elspeth----- Original Message -----From: nadeemSent: Thursday, May 20, 2004 3:25 AMSubject: Re: [frequent-dose-chelation] DAMS: NDFDAMS (dental amagam mercury syndrome) organisation recommends NDF, do not
encourage DMPS and DMSA, after getting feedback from many users.
Any opinion from this group wil be highly appreciated.
Thanks
----- Original Message -----
From: "laura shaffer" <dancingandflying@...>
To: <frequent-dose-chelation@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 7:58 PM
Subject: [frequent-dose-chelation] new member and questions
> hi everyone, i'm new to this group. i've been on
> adult-metal-chelation for a while but i heard that
> there is more specific information about my protocol
> here.
>
> i've been doing chelation with ALA and DMSA for about
> two months. i started out taking 500 mg of DMSA every
> other day, but after a couple of weeks i learned about
> the frequent dose schedule and started doing that,
> with 50mg each ALA and DMSA every 3 hours three days
> per week. that was fine, and i saw some improvement,
> but after a few weeks i decided to add 50mg samE to
> each dose, and also increased my ALA to 75mg per dose.
> the first week on the new program i felt very sick
> with flu-like symptoms, and i got some itchy red rash
> patches. the second and third week i didn't feel
> sick, but the rash continued (although it cleared up
> in some areas and got worse in others). also, i have
> not noticed much improvement since switching, although
> i expected an increase. so anyway, that's what my
> questions are about. does this rash mean anything
> about how my chelation is going? does it matter (like
> can i stay on this schedule if the rash doesn't bother
> me, or is it likely to be harmful in other ways)? is
> there any way i can treat the rash?
>
> thanks for any information,
> lara
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Domains - Claim yours for only $14.70/year
> http://smallbusiness.promotions.yahoo.com/offer
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
Offline 
Send Email