Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
fqtoxicity · Fluoroquinolones Levaquin Avelox Cipro
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Show off your group to the world. Share a photo of your group with us.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
this explains why all the FDA links are broken   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #8103 of 10830 |
Re: this explains why all the FDA links are broken

Wouldn't it be interesting to have a site (or even a link on a site) called
"Redundant and outdated FDA content"?? After all, noting on the web is ever
really deeted, it just changes locations.

It might piss of some people but then again, maybe they need to be pissed off.


--- In fqtoxicity@yahoogroups.com, "davidtfull" <Fqresearch@...> wrote:
>
> The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has updated the format of its
website to make it more user-friendly, but the change means that some old URLs
may no longer be valid.
> The agency said it changed its website, FDA.gov, based in part on feedback
from its main readers: Consumers, health professionals and industry
representatives.
>
> The new site, said FDA, contains new features that allow users to find
information more quickly. For example, information is now categorized by topic,
with related subjects consolidated in sections on the site.
> Content has been also been reviewed for relevance, with redundant and outdated
content removed. In some cases, older documents have been updated. Some features
that have been removed "will return in the near future as we complete the
transition to our new format," said FDA.
> The new site has new URLs for all content. In many cases, old URLs have been
redirected to the new locations. However, where there is no redirection, FDA
advises users to use its search function to find the information required.
>
> ***************************************************************
>
> What a crock. But at least this explains why all the links are broken on
wikipedia. Took an entire day to fix those links. Also explains why I can no
longer find the older data. The FDA stated that:
>
> Content has been also been reviewed for relevance, with redundant and outdated
content removed.
>
> So I guess all the older data concerning the fluoroquinolones that documents
the FDA malfeasance over the years is now considered to be irrlevant and
outdated. As you can not find it anywhere on the site any more. Particularly
the 1996 notice concerning the tendon issues. At least I can't anyhow. If it
is still there then it is a needle in a haystack.
>
> capt' dave
>





Sun Jul 5, 2009 12:29 pm

troykajoe
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #8103 of 10830 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has updated the format of its website to make it more user-friendly, but the change means that some old URLs may no...
davidtfull
Offline Send Email
Jul 5, 2009
5:48 am

Wouldn't it be interesting to have a site (or even a link on a site) called "Redundant and outdated FDA content"?? After all, noting on the web is ever really...
troykajoe
Offline Send Email
Jul 5, 2009
12:30 pm

Thanks for fixing the links in Wiki. After taking Levaquin I also feel "now considered to be irrlevant and outdated."...
taylorfq
Offline Send Email
Jul 5, 2009
9:12 pm

Reminds me of the old saying: How CONVEEENIENT, I think it was a bit on Saturday Night Live too. So now they are burying quinolone information under the guise...
Leslea Bates
lableslea
Online Now Send Email
Jul 6, 2009
12:46 pm
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help