Re: the FDA is at it again.... 1-legged cat?? lol
Oh that's a good one <<smile>>
And.... YOU?? Short-tempered?? Naaaaaaaah!! Considering what you're
doing, you're a pussycat here on the Forum.....
Keep fighting the good fight Capt!! GGRrrrrrrrrr!!!!!!!!!!!
~Shells~
--- In
fqtoxicity@yahoogroups.com, Fqresearch@... wrote:
So I end up like a one legged cat in a room full of rocking chairs.
Most of the time when I am short tempered here on the forum it is
usually
when I am battling the medical community over at wikipedia.
>
> Most, if not all, of those documents are on my server. I have copies
of
> the originals. So they are not lost to us even if the FDA were to
delete
> them completely. The problem is that the head honchos over at
wikipedia
> frown upon me linking back to my site. They seem to think that it is a
form
> of self promotion. So what I have to do now is check each and every
> reference in those articles that link to the FDA site and then update
them to
> these new addresses. Which is going to be a royal pain in .... but it
can be
> done. It will take weeks to do as I am doing so many things at once.
So I
> have to fit that in when I can.
>
> It is a constant hassle at wikipedia as I have to monitor all of those
> articles on a daily basis and undo any changes that are vandalism,
etc. Those
> edits that are legit, but I disagree with, I have to discuss with the
> editor making such changes and see if I can convince them to see
things from my
> point of view. As such the articles are in a constant state of flux
and I
> have to work my butt off to stop people from undoing all that work.
But if
> I can support my position with citations then I win these arguments.
When
> the links to my references disappear then you know what hits the fan.
So
> I end up like a one legged cat in a room full of rocking chairs.
>
> Most of the time when I am short tempered here on the forum it is
usually
> when I am battling the medical community over at wikipedia. But it is
> worth the effort as the articles have the greatest impact possible as
they are
> linked to hundreds of thousands of medical sites. So the word is
getting
> out to those that matter, and of course those who are now threatened
by this
> are fighting back tooth and nail. But there is nobody that I am not
> willing to go toe to toe with to keep these articles exactly as I have
written
> them. But at times I do get a bit punch drunk from all the hits I have
to
> endure to make this happen. If that is what it takes then that is
exactly
> what I will do.
>
> Somebody, somewhere has to go to bat for you guys and gals, and for
the
> moment it is I in the batter's box.
>
> capt' dave
>
>
> In a message dated 7/2/2009 4:38:49 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
> newslists@... writes:
>
> Hi Dave - Thanks for your time and efforts in keeping these important
> links "alive". I have no idea how long it will take you to update
hundreds of
> references - all I can say is thank you. (and I'd love to add some
swear
> words about the FDA, but won't write them here, I'll just continue
muttering
> them to myself as I type.)
>
> Sue
>
> --- In
fqtoxicity@yahoogroups.com, "davidtfull" Fqresearch@ wrote:
> >
> > The FDA has changed the locations for every document used as a
reference
> within the wikipedia articles that was linked by to the FDA site.
Thereby
> invalidating hundreds of references. I now have to go back and change
> each and every one of these references to reflect these new locations
> manually. I rather doubt that this was routine housekeeping on their
part as only
> the articles that related to the quinolone class were moved recently.
> >
> > Looks like they are engaging in damage control once again. They
cannot
> delete these articles as that would be destruction of evidence due to
the
> ongoing litigation. But nothing would prevent them from moving them
and
> invalidating all of the links found on the Internet that makes
reference to
> them.
> >
> > I've never been one for conspiracy theories regarding these drugs
but I
> am seriously reconsidering that view now. Far too much is going on
> recently for all of this to be coincidence. Too much information has
disappeared
> from the Internet, too many sites have shut down, and now this recent
> action by the FDA who for the most part has failed to update thier
site with
> anything relevant for years. Now all of a sudden they are archiving
anything
> that has to do with the quinolones?
> >
> > capt' dave
> >
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
> **************It's raining cats and dogs -- Come to PawNation, a place
> where pets rule! (
http://www.pawnation.com/?ncid=emlcntnew00000008)
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]