Go here for hyperlinked documentation:
http://www.libertytothecaptives.net/terris_wish_or_hubbards_hurrah.ht
ml


Larry King asked Michael Schiavo on the October 27, 2003 broadcast
of Larry King Live, why he doesn't just walk away from his effort to
remove his wife's feeding tube and let her parents take care of her:
KING: All right. Let's put it this way. Why do you want the feeding
tube removed? In other words, let's say the parents say they'll take
care of her, right? Is that what they say?

SCHIAVO: Mm-hmm.

KING: Walk away.

SCHIAVO: Why should I, Larry? This is Terri's wish. This is Terri's
choice.

(Quote source: Interview With Michael Schiavo)


According to Michael Schiavo, who is enjoying life with his live-in
female companion and their two children, removing Terri's feeding
tube is her wish:

"This is Terri's wish," Schiavo insisted. "It's been decided for six
years of litigation that this was Terri's wish. They keep saying I'm
the only one who came to the court with these comments that Terri
made, but there were two other people who testified also that she
did say that. This is Terri's wish."

(Quote source: Michael Schiavo on National TV: This is Terri's Wish)

Judge George Greer agreed in his September 17, 2003 court order that
states: "the Guardian, Michael Schiavo, shall cause the removal of
the nutrition and hydration tube from the Ward, Theresa Marie
Schiavo, at 2:00 p.m. on the 15th day of October, 2003. Judge Greer
states in this order that this case is about Terri's "right to make
her own decision":

But in the end, this case is not about the aspirations that loving
parents have for their children. It is about Theresa Schiavo's right
to make her own decision, independent of her parents and independent
of her husband.

(Quote source: Order of Death)

So that settles, that. Terri Schindler Schiavo is about to be
dehydrated to death because she made this decision herself--
independent of her parents and independent of her husband.

That is what the mainstream media would have you believe.


The Real Issue: Treatment Options and the Result

The real issue in the Terri Schiavo case was revealed earlier in
Judge Greer's November 22, 2002 order to remove Terri Schiavo's
feeding and hydration tube:

The real issue in this case, however, deals with treatment options
for Terry [sic] Schiavo and whether or not they will have any
positive affect so as to "significantly improve her quality of
life."

(Quote source: Nov. 22, 2002 ORDER emphasis added)

According to Judge Greer, the real issue in this case is about
whether treatment options for Terri Schindler Schiavo will
significantly improve her quality of life:

Initially, the Mandate required the court to hear testimony from
five expert medical witnesses to determine whether or not "new
treatment offers sufficient promise of increased cognitive function
in Mrs. Schiavo's cerebral cortex--significantly improving the
quality of Mrs. Schiavo's life--so that she herself would elect to
undergo that treatment and would reverse the prior decision to
withdraw life-prolonging procedures"

(Quote source: Nov. 22, 2002 ORDER emphasis added)

The above excerpt of Judge Greer's November 22, 2002 order (which
contains his summation of the October 11, 2002 trial) sends the
message that if Terri's treatment options would significantly
improve her cognitive function, she would choose to undergo that
treatment.

According to Greer's findings, treatment options presently available
do not offer "sufficient promise of increased cognitive function."
This order reflects this value system: no increased cognitive
function means no increased quality of life. Therefore, since the
court finds that Terri Schindler Schiavo's treatment options will
not cause her to significantly improve in cognitive function, the
court also finds that Terri would choose to receive no medical
treatment!

Judge Greer accepted the testimony of the doctors who did not
believe Terri would benefit from the medical treatment that is
currently available:

Dr. Hammesfahr feels his vasodilatation therapy will have a positive
affect on Terry (sic) Schiavo. Drs. Greer, Bambakidis and Cranford
do not feel it will have such an affect.

(Quote source: Nov. 22, 2002 ORDER emphasis added)

Judge Greer did not accept Dr. Hammesfahr's testimony, nor did he
permit him to treat Terri. (Dr. Hammesfahr has already offered to
treat Terri Schiavo free of charge.) Judge Greer predictably sided
with the doctors who testified that Terri could not improve with
therapy.

Since Judge Greer stated in his order that "The real issue in this
case, however, deals with treatment options for Terri," then WHY has
he refused to permit Terri to have treatment? Because according to
his findings, treatment options will not "significantly increase her
quality of life."

Judge Greer made it known that the real issue in Terri's case
is "treatment options and whether or not they will have any positive
affect so as to "significantly improve her quality of life."
According to the Sixth Circuit Court of Clearwater, Florida, the
level of a person's cognitive function determines his or her quality
of life.

According to the precedent which will be achieved if Terri Schindler
Schiavo is dehydrated to death, rehabilitative treatment will be
granted individuals the court has ruled will enjoy significant
improvement. Those the court rules will not significantly improve
will be denied any treatment and will be put to death.

The Terri Schindler Schiavo case is about "the first case of
euthanasia in Florida's reported case law."

But this case also sets another dangerous precedent: the denial of
medical treatment and rehabilitation services to people who are
ruled to be poor candidates for significant improvement. It is
currently against the law to deny treatment to any substantially
disabled person:

The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. Sections 12101
provides that necessary and appropriate rehabilitation services and
physical/motor skill therapy may not be denied a substantially
disabled patient in the United States of America.

(Florida Law Mandates That Terri Receive Rehabilitation Services)

Terri Schindler Schiavo is the first person in reported case law who
has been denied rehabilitative treatment (which violates current
laws) because Judge George Greer ruled that such treatment would
not "significantly improve her quality of life."



"Significant" Defined: L. Ron Hubbard's Tone Scale

The "church" of Scientology believes that people who cannot be
raised to a certain level of ability should not mingle with society.
Terri Schiavo's forced confinement to her hospice room reflects this
mentality. (See: Scientology Doctrine: Michael Schiavo Removed Terri
From Society.)

Furthermore, Scientologists believe that people who cannot be raised
above a 2.0 level on L. Ron Hubbard's tone scale have an urge to die:

Society, the bulk of which is bent upon survival, fails or refuses
to recognize death or the urge of organisms toward it. Society
passes laws against murder and suicide. Society provides hospitals.
Society carries such people [the disabled] on its back. And society
will not hear of euthanasia or "mercy killing." (Self Analysis by L.
Ron Hubbard; pg. 28)

According to Judge Greer's November 22, 2002 order to remove Terri
Schiavo's feeding and hydration tube, Terri must substantially
improve or be permitted no improvement at all; indeed, no life at
all. She must win (substantially improve) or lose everything (be
dehydrated to death). Judge Greer made no allowance for a small or
moderate improvement.

This is exactly the way Scientology would have it L. Ron Hubbard
wrote about organisms (people) needing to win. If they do not win,
he believed they would move in the direction of loss:

The goal is to win. When one has lost too much and too many times,
the possibility of winning seems to remote to try. And it loses. It
becomes so accustomed to loss that it begins to concentrate on loss
instead of forward advance.

(Self Analysis by L. Ron Hubbard pg. 41)

Scientology, which has an integral role in the New World Order
network, believes that able producers should not mix with the
disabled (which they consider to be nonproducers.) They believe that
contrasurvival entities (disabled and terminally ill people) should
be destroyed:

An individual, family, a group best survives, of course, when
prosurvival entities are in proximity and available and when
contrasurvival entities are absent. The struggle of life could be
said to be the procurement of prosurvival factors and the
annihilation, destruction, banishment of contrasurvival factors.

(Self Analysis by L. Ron Hubbard pgs. 176-177)

Michael Schiavo and Judge Greer have been pursuing the "banish,
destroy and annihilate the contrasurvival people" Scientology
idology for many years.

Michael has banished Terri from society by forcing her to live in
solitary confinement in a hospice room for five years.

Judge Greer has ordered Terri's destruction on at least two
occasions.

and he has agreed to allow Michael Schiavo to annihilate her remains
by immediate cremation.



Scientology Goal: Deny the Disabled Civil Rights; Mass Euthanasia
Will Follow

Scientology considers brain-damaged individuals such as Terri to be
aberrations or mentally defective. Scientology considers
such "defective" people as being unworthy of the full benefits of
citizenship:

"Perhaps at some distant date only the unaberrated person will be
granted civil rights before law. Perhaps the goal will be reached at
some future time when only the unaberrated person can attain to and
benefit from citizenship. These are desirable goals..." Dianetics;
the Modern Science of Mental Health, by L. Ron Hubbard (1987
edition, p.534)

The dehydration death of Terri Schiavo is Hubbard's Hurrah. Not only
because Judge Greer and others have marked this case so obviously
for Scientology, but also because those who live in Clearwater,
Scientology's spiritual headquarters, are too intimidated to speak
up and reveal that this case is being used to further some of
Scientology's major goals in the New World Order network: The denial
of civil rights for the disabled and its result: mass euthanasia.

Please speak up or tell us what you know and we will speak for you.
Terri is running out of time. May God intervene through you.

Gary and Lisa Ruby

02/23/05

Go here for hyperlinked documentation:
http://www.libertytothecaptives.net/terris_wish_or_hubbards_hurrah.ht
ml