--- In epilepsyalternatives@yahoogroups.com, "elizbinu" <santjohn@e...> wrote:
>
> Dudley,
>
> Oh this is too much between you and Liz. Liz is right when she says
> surgery was the best way for her since she had a structural lesion
> which was causing her seizures and the freedom she got from seizures
> since surgery proves her point. And its none of our business to tell
> her "This would have been better for you" or that "Had you done this,
> it would have spared you of surgery" and the like. Its meaningless
> and its not fair.
>
> Elishaba


You are misquoting me, which makes *your* post meaningless and unfair. What I
said was "You *might* have spared yourself the drugs and the surgery had you
tried Edgar Cayce's epilepsy treatment." We will never know whether Cayce's
treatment would have worked for her or not. Clearly she did not know what the
treatment was and had never even tried it, despite the fact that this is a
*Cayce* epilepsy group. In that sense, all her posts were off-topic. I am glad
that the surery worked for her. However, as I pointed out I a previous post,
lesions that cause epilepsy can be treated with non-surgical means, like
Cayce's, and it just might have helped her.