-------- Original Message --------






Mike wrote:
>
>
> Silvia,
>
> I'm not an ETP (despite having trained with you and having
> got and read your "Adventures in EFT" numerous times)
> and I'm curious to know what you'd have done next instead?
> I can see where Bandler demonstrates a "block" with his hands
> but what would you do next?
> Can you possibly describe it?
>
> Mike

If you play it again, wait until Bandler shows and repeats where the
blockage is, slightly below the center of the chest. (In EmoTrance, we
would go there directly, straight after the shield that is also
prescribed and painted into the room for all to see).

Bandler then says, "And where does it go next?"

The man responds, "Into my shoulders, my arms. And into my legs."

Bandler says jokingly, "Yeah well, and then it flows out of your fingers
..."

... which is EXACTLY what we do in EmoTrance, we follow the path the
energy wants to take and help it to flow faster, take out blockages
until it enters smoothly and rushes through and out. That rushing energy
produces the energised end state where people are just HOPPING with joy,
laughing, really, really up and alive and have totally changed their
minds on whatever it was you started with.

That moment where he says that in the video is where the path divides.
Instead of following with the NATURAL movement of the energy, Bandler
drops that line of enquiry altogether, then goes on to do some truly
WEIRD thing with spinning energy columns backwards and submodalities and
hypnosis thrown in for good measure, when the whole process could have
been over in minutes - if he'd just let that natural process of the
energy wanting to go out of the guys fingers and down his legs take its
natural course.

It is fascinating to note that as always, the client gives PRECISE AND
EXACT information as to the problem, its manifestation and location,
even suggests the precise channels that *should* be worked on - but it's
being dismissed as unimportant and then the practitioner goes off on
their own tangent of what they think should be done.

In EmoTrance, that is absolutely not allowed; the basic technique is
really tight and consists of a limited number of questions the
practitioner is allowed to ask. That keeps the client engaged and
working WITH the practitioner; stops the practitioner from going mad
with pet theories, starting to hallucinate or treating their own
problems accidentally instead of the client's; it stops transference,
overidentification and a whole host of problems from ever happening at
all. Plus you get all the cognitive and behavioural and state changes
you would ever want to see, all together, cohesive, ecological - and
it's FUN!

And all of it by simply paying attention to the CLIENT and trusting the
client's energy system to show us what needs to be done.

Beats learning lists of submodality markers that run into their
thousands, in my opinion.

This video is *such* a cool resource for looking at things with
EmoTrance eyes and seeing/hearing what's happening, I'm really pleased I
found it.

SFX