The sin bin -Vested interest Apathy and other unworthy systems
Dear reader this section is not pleasant reading so please be warned
if you are happy in your way and comfortable be warned this
information certainly has the capacity to unnerve you. However if you
do like to know what is going on and are not afraid of the truth read
on, it is very enlightening.
Drugs and other treatments
There are a few very important points that I would like to cover on
the subject of drugs and research and treatment At present the system
in England is this, all treatment recommended by the NHS should be
tested and approved and quite rightly so. Obviously it costs vast
sums of money to test and approve treatments because of the possible
damage to people and the subsequent litigation costing millions of
pounds. Where does this money come from to test and approve
treatments? By far the biggest source is the drug companies. So take
for example a researcher might go along to his local drug company and
tell them his findings about this treatment he has been working on
which is of outstanding value but needs testing further or approving,
you might think they would be falling over themselves to know more –
right, you could not be more wrong. By and large only treatments
which show a profit will even get examined. Because they are in
business to make a profit, not for serving the people. So many of the
thousands of therapies which they see as having no profit potential
do not get approved and thus by and large do not get recommended by
your local doctor or hospital despite the fact that some of them do
have overwhelming benefits some which have saved needless operations,
needless amputations, needless pain and trauma, needless kidney
failures and much loss of life.
So Mrs Jones by and large you will probably only get recommended
treatments where there is profit in them for someone.
Have you heard your local doctor recommend, Massage, Spiritual
healing, Knieisiology Herbs, Light therapy, Colour therapy,
Regression therapy, Osteopathy, Zappers, Magnetic devices, Electrical
Frequency devices. All of these have shown their inherent worth with
thousands if not millions of testimonials.
As you can see this system in its present state is inherently flawed
that is until the day comes when most of the research and testing is
done by an agency with no vested interests attached and a clear
agenda of being objective. There is clear evidence that some of these
drug companies will even go much further than just dismiss this
proposed treatment especially if it is going to affect their profits.

Ever heard of a brilliant doctor with the name of Raymond rife the
gifted scientist and winner of 14 government awards including
scientist of the year award twice.
Rife discovered that some major diseases could be eliminated with
frequencies based on that diseases individual electromagnetic
signature. He uses the same effect, which causes a glass to shatter
by the use of some peoples voices. These distinguished medical
doctors who originally confirmed part or this entire discovery
included:
E.C. Rosenow, Sr. (Chief of Bacteriology, 32 yrs., at Mayo Clinic),
Fredrich Koch (Detroit, Brazil), Gaston Naessens (Quebec), Sakae
Inoue (Japan), Georges Mazet (France,), Franz Gerlach (Germany),
Niello Mori and Clara Fonti (Italy), Cameron Gruner (McGill Univ.),
T.J. Glover (Canada), Florence Seibert (V.A. Research Lab,Bay Pines,
Fla.), Irene Diller (Inst. of Cancer Research, Phila, Penn), Eleanor
Alex. Jackson and Virginia Livingston (NJ & San Diego clinics).
But events started to happen; firstly, arsonists burned the Burnett
Lab in New Jersey, which was validating Rife's work.
Then, someone fatally poisoned Dr. Milbank Johnson, president of the
Southern California American Medical Association. He died just hours
before a scheduled press conference in which he was to announce that
Rife's electronic therapy cured every terminal patient in a study
supervised by the University of Southern California.
Dr. Nemes, who duplicated some of Rife's work just 40 miles from
Rife's lab, was killed in a mysterious fire, which destroyed his lab.
Rife stopped work, but died at Grossmont Hospital from a lethal dose
of Valium. Following Dr. Milbank Johnson's murder, threats, other
incidents followed; 30 doctors once photographed honoring Rife at a
banquet now denied they ever knew him! Dr. Isaac Kendall, Rife's
chief research associate and Dean of Northwestern Medical School,
received $200,000 in "grants" & disappeared. Was this a bribe?
Dr. Virginia Livingston-Wheeler in 1947 while studying tumors found
the same organism in all of them. Her findings were published in
August 1948 by the New York Microscopical Society Bullitin. Later in
Dec. 1950 Wheeler had an article published in the American Journal of
Medical Sciences on microbes cultures taken from both human and
animal tumors. On Sept. 10, 1953 The Washington Post reported the
discoveries of Dr. Wheeler and her team from Rutgers-Presbyterian
Hospital Laboratory which were disclosed at the 6 th International
Congress of Microbiology in Rome. They had found conclusive proof of
a microbial cause for cancer. When Dr. Wheeler and her group returned
from Rome to Rutgers-Presbyterian Hospital they found that the funds
for their laboratory were being cutt off. The laboratory was closed.
This was the behind- the-scenes work and doings of Dr. Corneluis P.
Rhoads, the head of Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. The fear
of the cancer industry elite is and was immense. If the truth about
the true cause of cancer becomes known a cheap cure will be found
shortly thereafter. This will kill the cancer goose which lays tens
of billions of dollars worth of eggs a year. Is there nothing these
scum will not do for their god money? No

And it does not stop there John Walsh head of the cayce center in
Durham England had a stuttering problem which he cured using the
recommendations of Edgar cayce , naturally he wanted to share this
with the stuttering society so that others may alleviate their
suffering, at a meeting he was going to deliver a talk telling
people of how he did it but just as he was about to speak , he was
stopped and the only reason John says is that the organizers realized
that if this information got out it could mean the end of their
society.

Doctors Hertal and Blanc undertook research on the effects of
microwave ovens and declared that foods cooked in this way posed a
greater risk to health than cooking by conventional means, food
cooked in this way seemed to have a cancerous effect on the blood. A
gag order was issued on both of these doctors .DR Hertal stood his
ground and fought the decision and the European court of Human rights
issued an order saying the gag order was contrary to the right of
Human expression and Switzerland was ordered to pay compensation.
Personally I have been extensively involved in sharing the Edgar
Cayce information, Spiritual healing and some information on the rife
machine over the Internet on problems like MS Parkinsons, Galucoma,
Myasthenia gravis etc. On the issue of M.S.thousands of groups who
had a site on the Internet were contacted including support groups,
hospitals etc. Major foundations and national societies were
contacted as well. These people have clear mission statements saying
for example, for the treatment, support and research on M.S.The
response -only a few even replied with some interest despite numerous
approaches and despite mentioning the clear evidence which the
meridian research institute was getting using the cayce therapies.
The next to try was the Myasthenia gravis association which is
located in Derby England, Cayce gave a couple of readings on this
problem, despite phone calls and letters and e mails including
letters to the chairman not one person came back to me .I tried a few
hundred other M.G. Associations throughout the Internet and only a
very few were interested. The others did not even reply.
Cayce on Glaucoma was also tried, again writing, and e mailing to
many National associations and support groups again with very little
interest. Also tried was posting information on the discussion forums
on the Internet, Many were removed, the "Wills eye hospital in the
USA were highly guilty of this. After this I tried Cayce on
Parkinson's again the same procedure was followed I even tried
writing and e mailing to Mary Baker chairman of the Parkinson's
society in England, she did not even reply. National organizations
were contacted and support groups, the results only about 5% showed
any interest at all.
The conclusion: Clearly there are forces out there that would do
anything to protect their interests, your unnecessary suffering is of
no consequence to them at all. There are lots of Charities,
organizations, associations, support groups who are proclaiming all
sorts of things, which have a sacred duty, to give you information,
to conduct and fund research, to push forward their cause, which are
failing miserably you the patient. They are seemingly more interested
in maintaining the status quo, keeping their jobs or are just
apathetic. As you can see they are not to be relied upon if you value
your health.
One must take responsibility for their own wellness, not hand the
problem over to others.
I advocate that most research should be done by government
organizations with the only vested interest in mind of that of the
patient, but that is a long way off.
As many NEXUS readers will know, Dr Hulda Clark has helped thousands
of people around the world cure themselves of many ailments and
diseases. Her approach is to remove exposure to solvents and to
remove parasites from the body.
On 20 September, Dr Hulda Clark was arrested in San Diego. She was
subsequently held in a prison in Santee, waiting extradition to
Indiana where she is charged with practising medicine without a
licence, a class C felony with a penalty of two to eight years in
prison.
The patients in her clinic in Mexico most of them terminally ill, but
getting better under Dr Clark's supervision had to be sent home to
try to do the protocols on their own.
Dr Clark was escorted from prison on 4 October and arrived in Indiana
on 6 October at 2.30 am. A hearing was held at 9.00 am and bail was
set at US$10,000. Dr Clark was offered a plea bargain with a fine if
she pleaded guilty, but she pleaded not guilty. The trial will be
held on 2 February 2000.


Other pioneers some of which we are in great debt too
J.C. Burnett: His "electronic medicine research lab" was burnt to the
ground while he was visiting Rife in 1939, just before the Rife
technology itself was attacked
Harry Oldfield: dismissed when he wanted to publish his research
demonstrating the damage done to the human energy field by
chemotherapy treatment
Upton, Knuth and Armstrong: inventors of the "homeotron" -forced into
bankruptcy
DR Albert Abrams: inventor of the "Oscilloclast", a forerunner of the
Rife generator. Slated by the establishment. Denounced as a quack and
a charlatan in 18 consecutive issues of "The Scientific American".
Died in shame and ignominy
George Lahovsky: Inventor of the "multi-wave oscillator". Run over by
a car and died 1943.
Bill Morre (researcher and author): fled into retreat
George De La Warre: Nearly bankrupted by legal proceedings
DR Franz Anton Mesmer: used magnets for healing - struck off
Ruth Drown: inventor of the "Radio Vision Instrument" and "Homo-vibra
ray instrument" - committed suicide
Wilhelm Reich: inventor of "Orgone Energy Accumulator" - died in
prison
C.M. Allen: driven insane
DR M.K. Jessup: reporter of the infamous "Philadelphia Experiment" -
suicide/murdered
DR Max Gerson: Used natural treatment regime to cure cancer, Multiple
Sclerosis and other disease. AMA harassment forced him to close
clinic and re-open in Mexico
Harry Hoxsey: (cured cancer using herbs). Mentally and financially
ruined by legal proceedings and AMA harassment. Arrested 157 times in
16 months. Died in suspicious circumstances, possibly murdered
Rene Caisse: (also cured cancer-using herbs). The 'Canadian Ministry
of Health and Welfare' had the whole of the records destroyed
immediately after her death in 1978. These records detailed thousands
of cured patients.
DR Lawrence Burton: Fraudulently accused of spreading AIDS
contaminated serum forcing the Bahamian government to close it down
under American pressure
DR Stanislaw Burzynski: Ordered by FDA to stop development of his
highly effective 'anti-neoplaston' treatment program. Raided and had
all his scientific, medical and personal records seized which were
never returned
Gaston Naessens: microbiologist - still alive and working with Rife
type microscope today. Developer of 714X cancer treatment -
Prosecuted for fraud and driven out of France. Prosecuted and
threatened again with life imprisonment in Canada but was acquitted
Dr. Andrew C. Ivy: world-renowned medical researcher. Researcher
of "Krebiozen" (harmless chemical compound which was claimed to have
observable, often curative benefits in 70% of cancer cases) suspended
from membership of the Chicago Medical Society, removed from the vice
presidency of the University of Illinois, and had his "resignation"
accepted by both national cancer societies. AMA declared
Krebiozen "worthless" six weeks after he published his research
(1951) even though a properly conducted trial would take 3-5 years,
dismissed all of his conclusions, discredited his research methods
and suggested that his belief in the compound was due to senility.

Edward J. McCabe: Health journalist who reported success of oxygen
therapy. Sentenced to 3 years in prison on the pre-text of tax
evasion 1999 (and served 2 years).

DR William F. Koch: Medical doctor, Professor of chemistry, histology
and physiology. Inventor of "Glyoxylide catalyst" cure for cancer.
Sued by FDA but was acquitted after 600 doctors testified in his
favor. Died of poisoning, 1967.

Dr. F.M. Eugene Blass: Developer of "Homozon™" (the original oxygen
therapy product) - murdered outside his house, same year and month as
DR Koch.

DR Basil Earle Wainright: Physicist - inventor of polyatomic
apheuresis oxygen therapy. Imprisoned for 4 years. Claims he survived
six assassination attempts whilst in prison.

DR George A. Freibott, IV. President of the American Naturopathic
Association, consultant for International Association for Oxygen
Therapy, US Government approved and internationally accepted expert
witness on oxygen/oxidation therapies. Survived numerous
assassination attempts and several anonymous phone calls threatening
him with his life.

DR James Boyce: Turned 254 people HIV+ to HIV- using ozone therapy:
Charged with using unproven methods and sentenced to 5 years in
prison. Had his medical license revoked.

Ken Thiefault sold ozone generators: Sentenced to 7 years in prison
for making medical claims for ozone generators. His wife was
sentenced to three years.


In Paul millers book on harry edwards and spiritual healing there are
a number of issues which are mentioned.
1.Harry it seems had enormous resistance to his work from certain
quarters people who claimed to be doctors but had it seems there own
hidden agendas. Harry presented a whole host of cases, which were
restored to good health from being so called incurable. Some doctors
were called to account for this. They would evade the issue and give
a variety of reasons for example the patient despite being born with
terrible deformations had a temporary remission which the healer was
not slow to point out seemed to occur just after healing had taken
place. The general medical view was that they would see the patient
in a few more years to check his progress .At the right time harry
then raised the issue again only to be told that too much time had
elapsed.
2.Another famous expletive was wrongly labelled x-rays and
spontaneous healing. Many times doctors opened up a patient to find a
growth only to find that it was gone. Mistaken diagnosis was another
favourite.
So you see that there are certain elements within the medical
profession who would gladly not see this work at all to the cost of
millions of peoples suffering. Their motives can only be guessed at.
On the other hand there are many brilliant doctors out there some of
which attended the sanctuary witnessing many healings and many
presented their own problems to harry for healing.

Oh yes the church, Harry it seems had many dealings with the church
and it seems was very disappointed to see that the church had failed
miserably its duty to go forth and heal the sick as was the master
Jesus commanded. Harry had invited numerous priests and bishops to
his healing demonstrations where they could witness right in front of
their very eyes some of the fantastic things which were going on .He
was disappointed that the archbishop of Canterbury had declined the
invitation to attend one of his healing demonstrations right under
the cathedral. But it started the seemingly very little known
commission to investigate divine healing. This commission had the
archbishop of Canterbury and York seeking the co-operation of the
British medical association who appointed a number of physicians to
examine the evidence put before them by the man they had jointly
denigrated. It was over two years before the Anglican Church got
their act together. They actually asked Harry to submit just six
cases for investigation –six can you imagine that number for a proper
investigation. Harry thought the same and submitted seventy many of
which were considered incurable by their very own doctors. After
submitting these and giving a lengthy address the response was
astonishing One of these so called doctors stood up and claimed they
could have been spontaneous healing, but Harry had pointed out it was
the doctors themselves who proclaimed these people were incurable.Un
believably no proper scientific examination of the seventy cases was
carried out. Harry was offered a position in the Church with
conditions which of course he could not accept to those who think
that the Church would not sink to these sort of tactics Harry
referred to the Archbishops commission on survival which was
suppressed and never officially published because the majority report
found that the case for survival was proven

Medical Mistakes in the USA
This article in the Journal of the American Medical Association
(JAMA) is the best article I have ever seen written in the published
literature documenting the tragedy of the traditional medical
paradigm.If you want to keep updated on issues like this to sign up
for my free
newsletter at mercola.comThis information is a follow up of the
Institute of Medicine report which hit the papers in December of 1999,
http://www.mercola.com/1999/dec/5/medical_mistakes.html
but the data was hard to reference as it was not in peer-reviewed
journal.
Now it is published in JAMA which is the most widely circulated
medical periodical in the world.The author is Dr. Barbara Starfield
of the Johns Hopkins School of Hygiene and Public Health and she
desribes how the US health care system may contribute to poor health.

ALL THESE ARE DEATHS PER YEAR:

12,000 -----unnecessary surgery 8
7,000 -----medication errors in hospitals 9
20,000 ----other errors in hospitals 10
80,000 ----infections in hospitals 10
106,000 ---non-error, negative effects of drugs 2

These total to 250,000 deaths per year from iatrogenic causes!!What
does the word iatrogenic mean? This term is defined as induced in a
patient by a physician's activity, manner, or therapy. Used
especially of a complication of treatment.
Dr. Starfield offers several warnings in interpreting these
numbers:First, most of the data are derived from studies in
hospitalized patients.Second, these estimates are for deaths only and
do not include negative effects that are associated with disability
or discomfort.Third, the estimates of death due to error are lower
than those in the IOM
>report.1 If the higher estimates are used, the deaths due to
iatrogenic causes would
>range from 230,000 to 284,000. In any case, 225,000 deaths per year
constitutes the third leading cause of death in the United States,
after deaths from heart disease and cancer. Even if these figures are
overestimated, there is a wide margin between these numbers of deaths
and the next leading cause of death (cerebrovascular disease).
Another analysis 11 concluded that between 4% and 18% of consecutive
patients experience negative effects in outpatient settings,with:
116 million extra physician visits
77 million extra prescriptions
17 million emergency department visits
8 million hospitalizations
3 million long-term admissions
199,000 additional deaths
$77 billion in extra costs

The high cost of the health care system is considered to be a
deficit, but seems to be tolerated under the assumption that better
health results from more expensive care.
However, evidence from a few studies indicates that as many as 20% to
30% of patients receive inappropriate care.An estimated 44,000 to
98,000 among them die each year as a result of medical errors.2 This
might be tolerated if it resulted in better health, but does it? Of
13 countries in a recent comparison,3,4 the United States ranks an
average of 12th (second from the bottom) for 16 available health
indicators. More
>specifically, the ranking of the US on several indicators was: 13th
(last) for low-birth-weight percentages13th for neonatal mortality
and infant mortality overall 14
11th for postneonatal mortality
13th for years of potential life lost (excluding external causes)
11th for life expectancy at 1 year for females, 12th for males
10th for life expectancy at 15 years for females, 12th for males10th
for life expectancy at 40 years for females, 9th for males
7th for life expectancy at 65 years for females, 7th for males
3rd for life expectancy at 80 years for females, 3rd for males
10th for age-adjusted mortality

The poor performance of the US was recently confirmed by a World
Health
Organization study, which used different data and ranked the United
States
as 15th among 25 industrialized countries.
There is a perception that the American public "behaves badly" by
smoking,
>drinking, and perpetrating violence." However the data does not
support this
>assertion.
>The proportion of females who smoke ranges from 14% in Japan to 41%
in
>Denmark; in the United States, it is 24% (fifth best). For males,
the range
>is from 26% in Sweden to 61% in Japan; it is 28% in the United
States (third
>best).
>The US ranks fifth best for alcoholic beverage consumption.
The US has relatively low consumption of animal fats (fifth lowest in
men
>aged 55-64 years in 20 industrialized countries) and the third
lowest mean
>cholesterol concentrations among men aged 50 to 70 years among 13
>industrialized countries.
>
>These estimates of death due to error are lower than those in a
recent
>Institutes of Medicine report, and if the higher estimates are used,
the
>deaths due to iatrogenic causes would range from 230,000 to 284,000.
>
>Even at the lower estimate of 225,000 deaths per year, this
constitutes the
>third leading cause of death in the US, following heart disease and
cancer.
>
>Lack of technology is certainly not a contributing factor to the
US's low
>ranking.
>
>Among 29 countries, the United States is second only to Japan in the
>availability of magnetic resonance imaging units and computed
tomography
>scanners per million population. 17 Japan, however, ranks highest on
health,
>whereas the US ranks among the lowest. It is possible that the high
use of
>technology in Japan is limited to diagnostic technology not matched
by high
>rates of treatment, whereas in the US, high use of diagnostic
technology may
>be linked to more treatment. Supporting this possibility are data
showing
>that the number of employees per bed (full-time equivalents) in the
United
>States is highest among the countries ranked, whereas they are very
low in
>Japan, far lower than can be accounted for by the common practice of
having
>family members rather than hospital staff provide the amenities of
hospital
>care.
>
>Journal American Medical Association Vol 284 July 26, 2000
>
>COMMENT: Folks, this is what they call a "Landmark Article". Only
several
>ones like this are published every year. One of the major reasons it
is so
>huge as that it is published in JAMA which is the largest and one of
the
>most respected medical journals in the entire world. I did find it
most
>curious that the best wire service in the world, Reuter's, did not
pick up
>this article. I have no idea why they let it slip by.
>
>I would encourage you to bookmark this article and review it several
times
>so you can use the statistics to counter the arguments of your
friends and
>relatives who are so enthralled with the traditional medical
paradigm. These
>statistics prove very clearly that the system is just not working.
It is
>broken and is in desperate need of repair.
>
>I was previously fond of saying that drugs are the fourth leading
cause of
>death in this country. However, this article makes it quite clear
that the
>more powerful number is that doctors are the third leading cause of
death in
>this country killing nearly a quarter million people a year. The
only more
>common causes are cancer and heart disease. This statistic is likely
to be
>seriously underestimated as much of the coding only describes the
cause of
>organ failure and does not address iatrogenic causes at all.
>
>Japan seems to have benefited from recognizing that technology is
wonderful,
>but just because you diagnose something with it, one should not be
committed
>to undergoing treatment in the traditional paradigm. Their health
statistics
>reflect this aspect of their philosophy as much of their treatment
is not
>treatment at all, but loving care rendered in the home.
>
>Care, not treatment, is the answer. Drugs, surgery and hospitals are
rarely
>the answer to chronic health problems. Facilitating the God-given
healing
>capacity that all of us have is the key. Improving the diet,
exercise, and
>lifestyle are basic. Effective interventions for the underlying
emotional
>and spiritual wounding behind most chronic illness are also
important clues
>to maximizing health and reducing disease.
>
>Related Articles:
>
>Medical Mistakes Kill 100,000 per year
>
>US Health Care System Most Expensive in the World
>
>Drug Induced Disorders
>
>Author/Article Information
>
>Author Affiliation: Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns
>Hopkins School of Hygiene and Public Health, Baltimore, Md.
Corresponding
>Author and Reprints: Barbara Starfield, MD, MPH, Department of
Health Policy
>and Management, Johns Hopkins School of Hygiene and Public Health,
624 N
>Broadway, Room 452, Baltimore, MD 21205-1996 (e-mail:
bstarfie@...).
>
>REFERENCES
>
>1. Schuster M, McGlynn E, Brook R. How good is the quality of health
care in
>the United States? Milbank Q. 1998;76:517-563.
>
>2. Kohn L, ed, Corrigan J, ed, Donaldson M, ed. To Err Is Human:
Building a
>Safer Health System. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1999.
>
>3. Starfield B. Primary Care: Balancing Health Needs, Services, and
>Technology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1998.
>
>4. World Health Report 2000. Available at:
>http://www.who.int/whr/2000/en/report.htm. Accessed June 28, 2000.
>
>5. Kunst A. Cross-national Comparisons of Socioeconomic Differences
in
>Mortality. Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Erasmus University; 1997.
>
>6. Law M, Wald N. Why heart disease mortality is low in France: the
time lag
>explanation. BMJ. 1999;313:1471-1480.
>
>7. Starfield B. Evaluating the State Children's Health Insurance
Program:
>critical considerations.
>Annu Rev Public Health. 2000;21:569-585.
>
>8. Leape L.Unecessarsary surgery. Annu Rev Public Health.
1992;13:363-383.
>
>9. Phillips D, Christenfeld N, Glynn L. Increase in US medication-
error
>deaths between 1983 and 1993. Lancet. 1998;351:643-644.
>
>10. Lazarou J, Pomeranz B, Corey P. Incidence of adverse drug
reactions in
>hospitalized patients. JAMA. 1998;279:1200-1205.
>
>11. Weingart SN, Wilson RM, Gibberd RW, Harrison B. Epidemiology and
medical
>error. BMJ. 2000;320:774-777.
>
>12. Wilkinson R. Unhealthy Societies: The Afflictions of Inequality.
London,
>England: Routledge; 1996.
>
>13. Evans R, Roos N. What is right about the Canadian health system?
Milbank
>Q. 1999;77:393-399.
>
>14. Guyer B, Hoyert D, Martin J, Ventura S, MacDorman M, Strobino D.
Annual
>summary of vital statistics1998. Pediatrics. 1999;104:1229- 1246.
>
>15. Harrold LR, Field TS, Gurwitz JH. Knowledge, patterns of care,
and
>outcomes of care for generalists and specialists. J Gen Intern Med.
>1999;14:499-511.
>
>16. Donahoe MT. Comparing generalist and specialty care:
discrepancies,
>deficiencies, and excesses. Arch Intern Med. 1998;158:1596- 1607.
>
>17. Anderson G, Poullier J-P. Health Spending, Access, and Outcomes:
Trends
>in Industrialized Countries. New York, NY: The Commonwealth Fund;
1999.
>
>18. Mold J, Stein H. The cascade effect in the clinical care of
patients. N
>Engl J Med. 1986;314:512-514.
>
>19. Shi L, Starfield B. Income inequality, primary care, and health
>indicators. J Fam Pract.
>1999;48:275-284.
>
>Other Newsletters
>http://www.mercola.com/2002/index.htm
>
>©Copyright 1997-2002 Dr. Joseph Mercola. All Rights Reserved. This
content
>may be copied in full, with copyright; contact; creation; and
information
>intact, without specific permission, when used only in a not-for-
profit
>format. If any other use is desired, permission in writing from Dr.
Mercola
>is required.
>Disclaimer - Newsletters are based upon the opinions of Dr. Mercola.
They
>are not intended to replace a one-on-one relationship with a
qualified
>health care professional and they are not intended as medical
advice. They
>are intended as a sharing of knowledge and information from the
research
>experience of Dr. Mercola and his community. Dr. Mercola encourages
you to
>make your own health care decisions based upon your research and in
>partnership with a qualified health care professional.