· Insurgents Kill Two U.S. Soldiers in Iraq
· Afghan Government Official Assassinated
· Taiwan Ballot Boxes Sealed After Election
· Philadelphia Veterans Stadium Reduced to Rubble
· PowerBar Founder Maxwell Dies at 51




Search for
Top News:

Updated: 08:54 AM EST
Bush's Ex-Terror Adviser Says Bush Ignored Threats

NEW YORK (March 21) - A former White House anti-terrorism adviser
has accused U.S. President George W. Bush of ignoring terrorism
threats before the Sept. 11 attacks and of making America less safe.



AP
Clarke's comments will air Sunday on "60 Minutes."

Richard Clarke, Bush's top official on counter-terrorism who headed
a cybersecurity board, told CBS "60 minutes" in an interview to be
aired on Sunday he thought Bush had "done a terrible job on the war
against terrorism."

"I find it outrageous that the president is running for re-election
on the grounds that he's done such great things about terrorism. He
ignored it. He ignored terrorism for months, when maybe we could
have done something to stop 9/11," Clarke told CBS.

Clarke, who was an adviser to four presidents, says in a book to be
published next week that the Bush administration should have taken
out al Qaeda and its training camps in Afghanistan long before the
attacks of Sept. 11, for which the militant network was blamed.

"I think the way he has responded to al Qaeda, both before 9/11 by
doing nothing, and by what he's done after 9/11, has made us less
safe," Clarke told CBS.

National security adviser Condoleezza Rice said the Bush
administration followed former President Bill Clinton's policy on al
Qaeda until it had developed its own terrorism strategy.


Talk About It


· Post a Message | Chat

In a transcript of a NBC News interview, made available by the White
House on Saturday, Rice said terrorism was a high priority for Bush
from the outset of his term.

"We did pursue the Clinton administration policy and pursued it
actively, until we could get in a place a more comprehensive policy -
- not to roll back al Qaeda -- but to eliminate al Qaeda," Rice said.

She said Bush had only been in office 230 days when the Sept. 11
attacks happened.

"Even if we had been able to do it in 190 days, or 150 days, it was
a policy that our counterterrorism people told us was going to
eliminate al Qaeda over three to five years," she said. "This was
not something that was going to stop September 11th."

Asked why the government did not retaliate after intelligence in
Spring 2001 showed al Qaeda was behind the bombing of the USS Cole
warship in Yemen, Rice said:

"We were concerned that we didn't have good military options, that
really all we had were options like using cruise missiles to go
after training camps that had long been abandoned and that it might
have just the opposite effect, it might, in fact embolden the
terrorists, not frighten them, or not think that they were being
taken seriously."

CBS said Clarke asserts in his book, "Against All Enemies," that
Bush ignored ominous intelligence "chatter" in 2001 about possible
terror attacks, but Bush's National Security counsel, Stephen
Hadley, said Bush did hear those warnings and was impatient for
intelligence chiefs to develop a new strategy to eliminate al Qaeda.

"All the chatter was of an attack, a potential al Qaeda attack
overseas. But interestingly enough, the president got concerned
about whether there was the possibility of an attack on the
homeland," Hadley told CBS.

He said "the president put us on battle stations. He asked the
intelligence community: 'Look hard. See if we're missing something
about a threat to the homeland."'

Clarke, who left his position in February 2003 after 30 years in
government service when the White House transferred functions of the
cybersecurity board to Homeland Security, said Bush's decision to
invade Iraq had strengthened terror groups.


03/21/04 01:01 ET

Copyright 2004 Reuters Limited. All rights reserved. Republication
or redistribution of Reuters content, including by framing or
similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written
consent of Reuters. Reuters shall not be liable for any errors or
delays in content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon. All
active hyperlinks have been inserted by AOL.