Upsilquitch,

Do you have the source for this? I would like to forward it to several people.

Also, do you have any expectations that this can be confirmed? If so, how long
do you think that might take.

I will appreciate any more information you have about this, and will be sending
anything you send on to some of my Palestinian contacts.

Best,
Hajja Romi

--- In du-watch@yahoogroups.com, "upsilquitch" <upsilquitch@...> wrote:
>
> Note: same ordnance in Afghanistna dn Iraq had radioactive signatures and left
DU, NDU and in one case EU residues.
>
>
> IAF Pursue Subterranean Targets with Earth Penetrators, Bunker Busters
>
> New information emerging from the ongoing conflict along the Gaza strip
indicate about new weapons being employed by the Israel Air Force. Among the
systems reviewed below are several types of earth and bunker penetrating
weapons, that could have been used in the recent attacks, designed to target
underground facilities, including tunnels, weapons caches and rocket launching
sites.
>
> Foreign reports indicated yesterday that a new type of earth penetrating
aerial delivered weapon was used by the Israel Air Force (IAF) to destroy
Palestinian tunnels along the Gaza-Rafah border.
> This should not come as a surprise, since Israel pioneered the earth
penetrating weapon technology back in the 1960s, when IMI developed the Runway
Penetrating Bomb (PPM), successfully used to neutralize the Egyptian and Syrian
airfields on Operation Moked, the dramatic and highly successful opening air
strike, on first day of the 1967 Six Day War.
>
> IMI's latest version of the PPM is the Runway Attack Munitions (RAM) designed
to destroy airfield runways by exploding underneath the runway's concrete
surface. This weapon has become a popular export product in recent years. While
the RAM is not guided, its submunitions could be effectively used for earth
penetrations.
> For more precise attacks, such as those employed against known tunnels, a much
larger weapon known as PB500A1 could be used.
>
> Developed by IMI, this bunker-buster is significantly smaller than the massive
US GBU-28 two-ton massive penetrating ordnance acquired by Israel. The 1000
pounds class weapon (425 kg) PB500A1 weapon is comparable in performance to
warheads weighing twice that weight, enabling aircraft to carry more weapons on
every sortie, facilitating multiple and simultaneous attacks as demonstrated
during the current operation. Both weapons can be guided by laser for precision
attack. IMI is also producing a special version of the 500 pound (227 kg) Mk82
bomb, designed for 'reduced effect', causing less collateral damage, when
employed on targets in dense urban area.
>
> While Israel does not confirm the exact type of weapon used for this purpose,
the experience gathered by employing JDAM weapons against tunnels in the past
undoubtedly played an instrumental role in their preparation for Sunday's
massive attack on the Palestinian tunnels, and is considered a major element in
Israel's preparedness to face subterranean threats, leading into it's territory.
>
> The Jerusalem Post indicated Tuesday that the Israel Air Force has used the
new lightweight GBU-39 Small Diameter Bomb acquired from the USA, in the recent
attacks in Gaza. The Post mentioned the new weapons ordered last September
having arrived last month, and already put to action with the IAF fighters.
These weapons could have been deployed by the Boeing/IAF F-15Is, since sofar SDB
is cleared for use only with this type of aircraft. However, sources in Boeing
denied such shipment has been delivered.
>
> GBU-39 uses geo-location for guidance, and, therefore, has the precision
typical with J-weapons (various JDAM weapons). The main difference from the JDAM
is the cruciform wing apparatus developed by MBDA, significantly extending the
range of the weapon. The IAF is also interested in extending the range of
standard JDAM weapons, for which JDAM-ER is one option. Similar EO guided
weapons developed by Rafael in Israel have already implemented range extension
utilizing gliding wings.
>
>
> "6 day war" ... hum, ... what do think of those forensics, eh, Jack
>