Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
du-watch · DEPLETED URANIUM WATCH - Information and analysis about US/NATO use of Depleted Uranium
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Hear how Yahoo! Groups has changed the lives of others. Take me there.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Too much DU oxide, what to do but spread it all around?   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #9395 of 9444 |
Too much DU, not enough soldiers and nations to (get away with genociding) we
may only suppose?
 
Now it's anyone's guess as to which industries will "bite" at this attractive
offer!
 
IG: Energy should reevaluate plans to bury depleted uranium oxide
 
By Katherine McIntire Peters kpeters@... January 14, 2009


In 2010, the Energy Department plans to begin converting uranium hexafluoride, a
byproduct of the uranium enrichment process, into depleted uranium oxide, a
stable material classified as low-level waste. The department then plans to
spend about $428 million to bury it -- all 550,000 metric tons of it -- during
the next 25 years.
 
But Gregory Friedman, Energy's inspector general, said there are promising
potential uses for the material and the department could avoid millions of
dollars in disposal costs if it pursued them. In a report released on Wednesday,
the IG found that Energy had cut funding to a number of viable research programs
aimed at reusing the depleted uranium oxide.
 
Senior managers told the IG they discontinued the research because the
technology budget for the Office of Environmental Management had been severely
cut during the Bush administration. Another factor in the decision was that no
single reuse alternative would consume the entire inventory of depleted uranium
oxide and officials wanted to avoid a piecemeal solution.
 
"We did not find these reasons to be compelling in light of the potential to
avoid significant disposal costs," Friedman wrote in a memorandum to Energy
Secretary Samuel Bodman. The research programs cost a small fraction of the $428
million the department plans to spend burying the waste. For example, one
promising application for using the material for radiation-shielding products
was slated to receive $420,000 in 2004, but the department invested only
$125,000 before canceling the project altogether.
 
Between 2002 and 2007, Environmental Management's technology development budget
was cut from about $200 million to $21 million, the IG found.
 
"Modest investments sufficient to continue the research for alternative use for
depleted uranium oxide have the potential to avoid significant disposal costs,"
the IG found. There could be other benefits as well. For example, Oak Ridge
National Laboratory discovered in 2006 that depleted uranium aggregate could be
combined with concrete to provide shielding for radiation from spent nuclear
fuel -- a finding with broad commercial and government applications.
 
The Oak Ridge study showed that using the material in radiation shielding had
the potential to consume the entire inventory of depleted uranium, thus negating
the department's concerns about a piecemeal approach to reusing the material,
the IG noted. Other applications could consume half or more of the inventory.
 
In response to the IG's findings, Inés Triay, acting assistant secretary for
Environmental Management, said the office would issue an "expression of
interest" to gauge industry's desire to use depleted uranium oxide.
 
www.govexec.com/story_page.cfm?articleid=41801&dcn=todaysnews


Help the US become Radiation Free!
www.radiation.org
 
Cathy Garger
www.mytown.ca/garger




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




Wed Jan 14, 2009 11:26 pm

savorsuccess...
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #9395 of 9444 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

Too much DU, not enough soldiers and nations to (get away with genociding) we may only suppose?   Now it's anyone's guess as to which industries will "bite"...
Cathy Garger
savorsuccess...
Offline Send Email
Jan 14, 2009
11:26 pm
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help