Mr. Rands is no longer a member of this group but, of course, the general public
is able to read the posts, as they are public.
As they say, all is fair in love and war. And yes, this issue of liberal use
of Uranium aerosol in Eurasia, Africa, Australia, and the Americas is anything
*but* love.
If anyone disagrees with something posted here, they are certainly welcome to
counter it with a good and valid argument showing an opposing viewpoint.
Personally, I did find it quite curious indeed to read how the UK was suddenly
so interested in crossing the Atlantic to dig up hot dirt in a small NY city in
order to study one of numerous US-Uranium-contaminated communities here. The
moment I read about the UK coming to Colonie, NY, I said, what's up?
Then lo and behold, we find this same researcher talking in his very next
breath about 800 soldiers who'd been in combat around Uranium oxide - only to
discover that - miraculously - there wasn't a single hot vet in the bunch to be
found! How miraculous is that?!
Now, as if on cue? There are reports coming out inside the US to try to prove
the exact same thing about US veterans. I'm fully expecting the loyal and
obedient-to-Empire professional Spin Masters at the Associated Press to tell us,
Oh, by the way? All those 1.6 million vets with illnesses and disabilities like
cancers and neuro-muscular diseases you read about in our VA report?
http://www.rense.com/general79/since.htm
Well, those sick vets are that way due to the natural radiation from the
sunshine! Yes, the natural sun! The 1.6 million sick and dying veterans simply
forgot to use protective sun parasols and sunscreen our troops were issued for
use in Afghanistan and Iraq. Yeah, that's the ticket!
Yes, any of us paying any attention to this whole game predicted this was
coming. It was just a matter of time.
So now the American USA-Today and Washington Post-reading public will say,
Whew, what a relief! I guess now that our military says so, Uranium weapons
really present no threat for our troops at all!
On top of this, we've got a quite famous humanitarian lawyer telling us to get
the US to stop using Uranium munitions by writing letters to France... and we've
got the liberal rah-rah groups telling us not to oppose federally-owned DU sites
but rather, only the DU corporations who manufacture the bullets and bombs for
the feds... and we've got UK researchers flying across the Atlantic, not
bothering to test around US and UK federally owned and run DU-contaminated
sites, but rather only the dirt around a closed-down corporation.
It now occurs to many of us watching this dirty game unfolding with eyes wide
open that never before in US history has grassroots activism ever been quite
this important.
Cathy Garger
upsilquitch <upsilquitch@...> wrote:
... if you can't stand the heat.
Your problem is you're a whiner, a crybaby who's playing in a
battlefield you don't understand. Uranium contamination is life and
death. Not some topic of entertainment for your spare time. These
folks you like to defend are enemies of creation because they spin
lies to rewrite science, to obfuscate medical research and to
misdirect the sincere but unknowing inquiry. Their loyalties are
obvious to anyone who looks beyond the surface.
You never took a serious look into one objection posed against these
traitors to humanity. You never explored a single scientific
question raised on DU Watch. Your willful ignorance always prevented
you from going to a science/medicine library to research. You made no
valuable contribution to this issue. You're a time waster and member
of the club.
Those who are acclaimed by the establishment are hardly a challenge
to its (lack of) integrity.
Go home to mummy.
Help the US become Radiation Free by 2033!
www.radiation.org
Cathy Garger
www.mytown.ca/garger
---------------------------------
Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your homepage.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]